TSO C112e PDF
TSO C112e PDF
TSO C112e PDF
Department of Transportation
Federal Aviation Administration
Effective
Aircraft Certification Service
Date: 09/16/13
Washington, D.C.
2. APPLICABILITY. TSO-C112e is applicable for new applications after the effective date of
this TSO.
a. TSO-C112d will remain effective until March 13, 2015, after this date we will no longer
accept applications for TSO-C112d.
b. ATCRBS / Mode Select (Mode S) airborne equipment approved under a previous TSOA
may still be manufactured under the provisions of its original approval.
(2) Loss of the function defined in paragraph 3.a is a minor failure condition.
Page 2
TSO-C112e 09/16/13
equipment maintains an equivalent level of safety. Apply for a deviation under the provision
of 14 CFR § 21.618.
4. MARKING.
a. Mark at least one major component permanently and legibly with all the information in
14 CFR § 45.15(b). The marking must include the serial number. The marking must also
include the transponder’s functional level, minimum peak output power, and optional additional
features in accordance with RTCA/DO-181E, Section 1.4.6 (Transponder Labeling). As a
courtesy to operators and repair stations, and with the permission of RTCA, Inc., we have
included a copy of Sections 1.4.3 through 1.4.6 in Appendix 1. In addition, because the
transponder labeling scheme has been revised in RTCA DO-181E, Appendix 1 also contains a
cross-reference to the equipment marking currently in 14 CFR Part 43 appendix F.
b. Also, mark the following permanently and legibly, with at least the manufacturer’s
name, subassembly part number, and the TSO number:
(1) Each component that is easily removable (without hand tools); and,
(2) Each subassembly of the article that you determined may be interchangeable.
c. If the article includes software and/or airborne electronic hardware, then the article part
numbering scheme must identify the software and airborne electronic hardware configuration.
The part numbering scheme can use separate, unique part numbers for software, hardware, and
airborne electronic hardware.
d. You may use electronic part marking to identify software or airborne electronic
hardware components by embedding the identification within the hardware component itself
(using software) rather than marking it on the equipment nameplate. If electronic marking is
used, it must be readily accessible without the use of special tools or equipment.
(3) Installation procedures and limitations sufficient to ensure that the ATCRBS / Mode
Select (Mode S) airborne equipment, when installed according to the installation or operational
Page 3
TSO-C112e 09/16/13
procedures, still meets this TSO’s requirements. Limitations must identify any unique aspects of
the installation. The limitations must include a note with the following statement:
(4) For each unique configuration of software and airborne electronic hardware,
reference the following:
(a) Software part number including revision and design assurance level,
(b) Airborne electronic hardware part number including revision and design
assurance level,
(c) Functional description, and
(d) Failure condition classification.
(5) A summary of the test conditions used for environmental qualifications for each
component of the article. For example, a form as described in RTCA/DO-160G, Environmental
Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment, Appendix A.
(6) Schematic drawings, wiring diagrams, and any other documentation necessary for
installation of the ATCRBS / Mode Select (Mode S) airborne equipment.
b. Instructions covering periodic maintenance, calibration, and repair, for the continued
airworthiness of ATCRBS / Mode Select (Mode S) airborne equipment. Include recommended
inspection intervals and service life, as appropriate.
c. If the article includes software: a plan for software aspects of certification (PSAC),
software configuration index, and software accomplishment summary.
d. If the article includes simple or complex custom electronic hardware: a plan for
hardware aspects of certification (PHAC), hardware verification plan, top-level drawing, and
hardware accomplishment summary (or similar document, as applicable).
e. A drawing depicting how the article will be marked with the information required by
paragraph 4 of this TSO.
Page 4
TSO-C112e 09/16/13
(2) Installation procedures and limitations sufficient to ensure that the non-TSO
function(s) meets the declared functions and performance specification(s) described in paragraph
5.f.(1).
(5) Test plans, analysis and results, as appropriate, to verify that performance of the
hosting TSO article is not affected by the non-TSO function(s).
(6) Test plans, analysis and results, as appropriate, to verify the function and
performance of the non-TSO function(s) as described in paragraph 5.f.(1).
g. The quality system description required by 14 CFR § 21.608, including functional test
specifications. The quality system should ensure that you will detect any change to the approved
design that could adversely affect compliance with the TSO MPS, and reject the article
accordingly. (Not required for LODA applicants.)
i. List of all drawings and processes (including revision level) that define the article’s
design.
b. Schematic drawings.
c. Wiring diagrams.
Page 5
TSO-C112e 09/16/13
g. If the article includes complex custom airborne electronic hardware, the appropriate
hardware life cycle data in combination with design assurance level, as defined in
RTCA/DO-254, Appendix A, Table A-l. For simple custom airborne electronic hardware, the
following data: test cases or procedures, test results, test coverage analysis, tool assessment and
qualification data, and configuration management records, including problem reports.
h. If the article contains non-TSO function(s), you must also make available items 6.a
through 6.h as they pertain to the non-TSO function(s).
a. If furnishing one or more articles manufactured under this TSO to one entity (such as an
operator or repair station), provide one copy or on-line access to the data in paragraphs 5.a and
5.b of this TSO. Add any other data needed for the proper installation, certification, use, or for
continued compliance with the TSO, of the ATCRBS / Mode Select (Mode S) airborne
equipment.
b. If the article contains declared non-TSO function(s), include one copy of the data in
paragraphs 5.f.(1) through 5.f.(4).
a. Order RTCA documents from RTCA Inc., 1150 18th Street NW, Suite 910, Washington,
D.C. 20036. Telephone (202) 833-9339, fax (202) 833-9434. You can also order copies online
at www.rtca.org.
b. Order copies of 14 CFR parts 21, 43 and 45, from the Superintendent of Documents,
Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 979050, St. Louis, MO 63197. Telephone (202) 512-
1800, fax (202) 512-2250. You can also order copies online at www.gpo.gov. Select “Access,”
then “Online Bookstore.” Select “Aviation,” then “Code of Federal Regulations.”
c. You can find a current list of technical standard orders and advisory circulars on the
FAA Internet website Regulatory and Guidance Library at http://rgl.faa.gov/. You will also find
the TSO Index of Articles at the same site.
Susan J. M. Cabler
Assistant Manager, Aircraft Engineering Division
Page 6
TSO-C112e 09/16/13
1.1. Purpose. This appendix describes the cross-reference for ATCRBS / Mode Select
(Mode S) equipment markings into the classes referenced in 14 CFR Part 43 Appendix F as of
the date of this TSO.
1.2. Detailed Cross-Reference. The TSO-C112e marking scheme does not match the classes
called out in Appendix F of 14 CFR Part 43. The new TSO marking is based on RTCA
Document DO-181E, Section 1.4.6 (Transponder Labeling), rather than the marking that had
been defined previously in TSO-C112.
To assist operators in complying with 14 CFR Part 43, the following table shows the relationship
between the TSO-C112e marking scheme and the Part 43 Appendix F requirement. Equipment
approved under TSO versions previous to TSO-C112c are not affected, and may continue to use
the marking from the equipment directly. Manufacturers of TSO-C112e equipment are
encouraged to include this cross-reference information in their operating guide and maintenance
instructions until such time that 14 CFR Part 43 Appendix F is revised. In addition, the relevant
portions of DO-181E regarding labeling scheme (Sections 1.4.3 through 1.4.6) is repeated below
in Table 2 as a courtesy to operators and repair stations.
Page 7
TSO-C112e 09/16/13
The data link function of Mode S transponders provides for information transfer in both
directions between ground and air and between airborne units. Data link
implementation varies and depends on the amount of information to be exchanged.
The Level 1 Transponder supports the surveillance functions of both ATCRBS and
Mode S ground sensors and the surveillance functions of airborne interrogators. This
transponder can also reply to an airborne interrogator thereby making its presence
Page 8
TSO-C112e 09/16/13
d. Lockout protocols,
Note: Level 1 permits SSR surveillance based on pressure-altitude reporting and the
Mode A identity code. In an SSR Mode S environment, technical performance
relative to a Mode A/C transponder is improved because of Mode S selective
aircraft interrogation.
Level 2 Transponders shall have the capabilities of §1.4.3.1 and additionally support
the receipt of long interrogations and the generation of long replies. The Level 2
Transponder supports all of the surveillance functions and also supports:
The ground-air-ground data link capability comprises a multitude of services and can
be implemented according to the number and kind of services available, depending on
the mission requirements of the aircraft. Protocols provide a means of reporting to the
ground the specifics of each individual installation.
Page 9
TSO-C112e 09/16/13
Specific capabilities of a Level 2 or higher transponder have been defined for operation
in European airspace. Requirements for Elementary Surveillance (ELS) and Enhanced
Surveillance (EHS) compliant transponders are included in this document (§2.2.24 and
§2.2.25). Specific data registers and content appropriate for these capabilities are
provided.
In addition to the capabilities of the Level 1 and Level 2 Transponders, the Level 3
transponder is able to receive ELMs from the ground. ELMs are received in the
Comm-C format and consist of a burst of uplink transmissions that need not be replied
to individually but are acknowledged in a reply containing a summary of the received
interrogations.
Level 3 Transponders shall have the capabilities of §1.4.3.2 and also those prescribed
for ground-to-air Extended Length Message (ELM) communications.
Note: Level 3 permits extended length data link communications from ground-to-air
and thus may provide retrieval from ground-based data banks and receipt of
other air traffic services which are not available with Level 2 transponders.
In addition to all the capabilities of a Level 3 Transponder, the Level 4 Transponder can
generate ELMs for transmittal to the ground by using the Comm-D format.
Level 4 transponders shall have the capabilities of §1.4.3.3 and also those prescribed
for air-to-ground extended length message (ELM) communications.
Note: Level 4 permits extended length data link communications from air to ground
and thus may provide access from the ground to airborne data sources and the
transmission of other data required by air traffic services which are not
available with Level 2 transponders.
In addition to the full ELM capability, the Level 5 Transponder can support the
enhanced data link protocols. The protocols provide for increased data link capacity by
permitting data link transactions with more than one Mode S interrogator at a time
without the need for multisite coordination. These protocols are fully conformant to the
data link transponder protocols description of §2.2.19.1 to §2.2.20.2.1 (the standard
protocols) and are therefore compatible with interrogators that are not equipped for the
enhanced protocol.
Level 5 transponders shall have the capabilities of §1.4.3.4 and also those prescribed
for enhanced Comm-B and extended length message (ELM) communications.
Note: Level 5 permits Comm-B and extended length data link communications with
Page 10
TSO-C112e 09/16/13
Page 11
TSO-C112e 09/16/13
Two minimum peak output power levels are supported by this version of these MOPS,
125 watts (21.0 dBW), which is designated as Class 1 equipment, and 70 watts (18.5
dBW), which is designated as Class 2 equipment. For more information on output
power levels, see §2.2.3.2.
Class 1 equipment is intended for use in aircraft that operate at altitudes above 15000 ft,
or have a maximum cruising true airspeed in excess of 175 kt (324 km/h).
Class 2 equipment may be used in aircraft that operate at altitudes not exceeding 15000
ft, and have a maximum cruising true airspeed not exceeding 175 kt (324 km/h).
Each transponder shall be clearly labeled with its actual functional level, minimum
peak output power, and its optional additional features. The label shall contain the word
“Level” followed by one digit between 1 and 5. (see §1.4.3.1 through § 1.4.3.5),
followed by the ID Codes for the incorporated optional additional features as shown in
Table 1-1, followed by the transponders’ minimum peak output power designation as
“Class 1” or Class 2” (see §1.4.5).
Page 12
TSO-C112e 09/16/13
minimum peak output power of 125 watts (21.0 dBW), the transponder would be
labeled “Level 4adens, Class 1.”
The label should be clearly visible when the transponder is mounted on the aircraft. In
the case of a change of transponder level or capability, the label must be changed
appropriately.
Page 13
TSO-C112e 09/16/13
1.1. Text added to modify RTCA DO-181E is underlined. Text to be removed is lined
through.
2.1. RTCA DO-181E, page 87, section 2.2.19.1.12.5 is modified here to ensure multiple
Comm-B message changes are processed properly.
Page 14
TSO-C112e 09/16/13
Waiting Comm-B broadcasts shall be retained for transmission once the current
Comm-B broadcast is finished. If the contents of a waiting Comm-B broadcast
changes, only the most recent value shall be broadcast. This prevents multiple
changes from generating a sequence of broadcasts. Currently only BDS registers
1,0, Downlink Capability Report and, 2,0, Flight ID, make use of the Comm-B
Broadcast protocol.
2.2. A test procedure is added here to ensure the modified requirements in section 3.1 of this
appendix are met. This test is intended to follow RTCA DO-181E, section 2.5.4.21A, on page
284.
* * * * *
Page 15