Points de Vue 73 English
Points de Vue 73 English
MYOPIA
73
DE
SP
EN A U T U M N 2016 - O FFE R E D
FR © 2 0 1 6 E SSILO R INTE R NATIO NAL
WWW.POINTSDEVUE.COM
Points de Vue, the International Review of Ophthalmic Optics created
by Essilor in 1979, is committed to providing prescribers (all eye care
professional involved in prescription throughout the world) with
forward-looking and useful information for their practices and effective
patient care.
CARRACEDO Gonzalo
CHRIEN Sebastian
FRANCHI Christian
LONGO Adèle
MASSE Alain
MESLIN Dominique
PAILLE Damien
CAVANAGH Maureen PEREIRA Léonel
HERZBERG Cary POUSSIN Stanislas
LEUNG Dennis REMIASOVA Monika
WILLIAMS J. Bruce MISKOVIC Jan
JONG Monica
NAIDOO Kovin
READ A. Scott
SANKARIDURG Padmaja
F O R A N Y CO MMEN TS O R Q UESTI O N S,
C O N TA C T U S AT: P O IN TSD EVUE@ ESSILO R.CO M
We strive to answer within 24 hours. We are at GMT+01
EDITO
Eva Lazuka-Nicoulaud
Director of the Publication
MYOPIA
TACKLING A PANDEMIC
Surprisingly enough for a non-infectious condition, myopia is reaching pandemic proportions
across the world.
Record-breaking figures. In the US and Europe, the prevalence of myopia has doubled over
the last century, reaching 40-50% of young people (aged < 35) today. East Asia has been hit
particularly badly. In countries such as Singapore, China and Korea, myopia affects around
80-90% of urban teenagers, compared to 10-20% sixty years ago. Recent work from the Brien
Holden Vision Institute (BHVI) estimates that by 2050, five billion people, or half the world’s
population, will be myopic and one billion, or 10%, highly myopic.1 A record-high myopia of
-108 diopters has recently been compensated in Slovakia, Europe, representing new
challenges for eye care practitioners and the ophthalmic industry.2 While the direct global
socio-economic impact of myopia has not yet been determined,
the economic burden of uncorrected refractive error (URE),
which is largely caused by myopia, is estimated to be more than “Sur p r is ing ly eno u g h f o r a
US$269 billion (per annum) – and this number is growing as the
no n- infectio us co n d i t i o n ,
pandemic spreads.3
my o p ia is r eaching p a n d e m i c
The good news. Over the past few months there has been a
p r o p o r tio ns acr o s s t h e w o r l d ”
notable increase in alarming publications in scientific journals
and the media on the myopia crisis. However, leading research
centers and medical universities have been vigorously focused for some time on furthering
understanding of the condition and developing new treatments for it.4 Etiology investigations
have uncovered that myopia onset and its progression in children are correlations of both
hereditary (nature) and environmental factors (nurture). The latter can be modified by
encouraging greater exposure to natural light through outdoor activities5 and adopting good
reading posture. We take the opportunity in this issue to share some perspectives from
25 experts – scientists and eye care practitioners – taking a look at their approach to
understanding, correcting6 and treating myopia, plus preventing its progression in children.7
Hope in sight. Biochemical research for the myopia pathogenic mechanism will continue to
be a hot topic. Luckily, the progress made over the past decade gives us reason for hope. At
present, the overwhelming majority of myopia cases can be corrected with regular prescription
eyeglasses, contact lenses or refractive surgery. There are also the solutions that correct and
control myopia progression in children. Specific multifocal contact lenses, Myopilux®
ophthalmic lenses8 and orthokeratology (Ortho-K) are all recognized as safe and effective
procedures in the long term.9 While pharmacological interventions such as atropine eye drops
at low concentration do not correct myopia, they effectively control its progression. There is
no doubt tailor-made solutions help patients live their life to the fullest. One need look no
further than Mr. Miskovic, the man with the world’s highest degree of myopia at -108D – as
a successful photographer, he is pursuing his dream !10
1. Jong M, Sankaridurg P, Naidoo K, Myopia: A public health crisis in waiting, 6. Franchi Ch, Longo A, Meslin D, High Myopia: The specificities of refraction
- Page 44 and optical equipment - Page 34
2. Chrien S, Masse A, Pereira L, Poussin S, Remiasova, Record-high myopia 7. Garcia S, Herzberg CM, Leung D, Prada J, Williams BT, Orthokeratology
solved by an alliance of experts: -108.00 D - Page 66 in clinical practice across the world - Page 28
3. Cavanagh M, Myopia rise and vision health issues left in its wake - Page 49 8. Yeo A, Koh P, Paille D, Drobe B, Myopia and Effective Management Solutions
4. Lu F, A look at myopia research in China - Page 12 - Page 56
5. Read AS, Light exposure and childhood myopia - Page 20 9. Herzberg CM, Carracedo G, A look at progress in orthokeratology - Page 06
10. Miskovic J, Practicing the art of photography with -108 D myopia - Page 72
VERBATIM
“1 I N 1 0 P E O P L E
WO R L D W I D E WI LL
BE A T RI SK F O R
P E RM AN E N T BL I N D N E S S
BY T H E YE A R 2 0 5 0 .”
PROF. KOVIN NAIDOO
quotation used in M. Cavanagh’s article page 49
03 EDITORIAL
06 EXPERTS’ VOICE 43 MARKET WATCH
44. MYOPIA: A PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS IN WAITING
06. A LOOK AT PROGRESS IN
Dr. Monica Jong, Prof. Padmaja Sankaridurg,
ORTHOKERATOLOGY OVER THE LAST DECADE
Prof. Kovin Naidoo
Dr. Cary M Herzberg, Dr. Gonzalo Carracedo
49. MYOPIA RISE AND VISION HEALTH ISSUES LEFT
12. A LOOK AT MYOPIA RESEARCH IN CHINA
IN ITS WAKE
Prof. Fan Lu
Maureen Cavanagh
19 SCIENCE 55 PRODUCT
20. LIGHT EXPOSURE AND CHILDHOOD MYOPIA
56. MYOPIA AND EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT
Prof. Scott Read
SOLUTIONS
Dr. Anna Yeo, Patricia Koh, Dr. Damien Paillé,
Dr. Björn Drobe
66. RECORD-HIGH MYOPIA SOLVED BY
AN ALLIANCE OF EXPERTS: -108.00 D
27 CLINIC Sebastian Chrien, Alain Massé, Léonel Pereira,
28. ORTHOKERATOLOGY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE Stanislas Poussin, Monika Remiašová
ACROSS THE WORLD
Bruce T. Williams, Sergio Garcia, Javier Prada,
Dennis Leung, Dr. Cary M Herzberg
34. HIGH MYOPIA: THE SPECIFICITIES
OF REFRACTION AND OPTICAL EQUIPMENT 71 ART AND VISION
Christian Franchi, Adèle Longo, Dominique Meslin
72. PRACTICING THE ART OF PHOTOGRAPHY
WITH -108 D MYOPIA
Jan Miskovic
WE THANK ALL AUTHORS AND CO-AUTHORS FOR THEIR VALUABLE AND VOLUNTARY
(UNPAID) CONTRIBUTION TO POINTS DE VUE. TO ENSURE BOTH CREDIBILITY AND IMPARTIALITY
OF THE CONTENT, WE DO NOT FUND SIGNED ARTICLES, AND IN THE SAME WAY WE OFFER THE MAGAZINE
FOR FREE TO READERS, BOTH THROUGH PRINT AND ONLINE.
Dr. Herzberg has been practicing Orthokeratology and myopia Dr. Gonzalo Carracedo joined the University Complutense of
control for over thirty-five years. He has lectured extensively Madrid as an assistant professor of optometry and contact lenses
on the topic, written numerous articles and holds a patent in 2006. He is also currently a lecturer at the European University
on the first scleral Orthokeratology design. He is co-founder, of Madrid, where he teaches about specialty contact lenses.
President, board member and fellow of the International Academy He obtained his PhD (European mention) with a thesis entitled
of Orthokeratology & Myopia Control (IAOMC) and the founder, “Adenine dinucleotides as molecular biomarkers of dry eye”.
President and a board member American Academy of He belongs to the Ocupharm Diagnostics research group,
Orthokeratology and Myopia Control(AAOMC) formerly The which focuses on the ocular surface, contact lenses and dry
Orthokeratology Academy of America(OAA). He is an advisory eye research and development. He is also a member of the GICO
board member of the Gas Permeable Lens Institute (GPLI) and research group, which is specialized in myopia control, corneal
a former contact lens design consultant to C&H Contact Lens. aberrations and vision. His PhD thesis dealt with nucleotides as a
He has visiting Professor status at Tianjin Medical University, marker of dry eye in different conditions, including when wearing
Shandong Medical University and He Eye Hospital/University. contact lenses or in the context of refractive surgery and systemic
disease related to dry eye. He is the author of 38 papers (some
related to myopia control and orthokeratology) in peer-review
journals such as IOVS, Current Eye Research and Experimental
Eye Research. He has also been a reviewer for these journals,
plus the Journal of Optometry and the Journal of Ocular
Pharmacology and Therapeutics. He has been involved in 16
research projects (four as the main researcher) regarding the
ocular surface (i.e. keratoconus, dry eye myopia and contact
lenses) and glaucoma.
KEYWORDS
Orthokeratology, Ortho-K, myopia control, corneal reshaping,
peripheral defocus
T
he orthokeratology (Ortho-K) effect was first observed as a side Ten years of progress
effect of contact lenses made of Poly methyl methacrylate
(PMMA), which flattened in their radius of curvature over time. Three overriding themes stand out in the past
“What started as a method to reduce temporarily the refractive error decade of progress in orthokeratology. They are
of nearsighted individuals evolved, with the help of innovative design the technologies, safety/efficacy and myopia
choices, to advanced engineering of the corneal surface of the eye,” control. “The progress in these three areas has
explains Dr. Cary M. Herzberg, OD FIAO, president of the International been nothing short of astounding and has
Academy of Orthokeratology and Myopia Control (IAOMC). cleared the path forward to an exciting new era
for the non-surgical treatment of refractive states
With the optics and resulting aberrations of an oblate corneal surface of the human visual system,” says Dr. Herzberg.
including spherical aberration, advanced design choices could pro-
vide solutions for progressive myopia and presbyopia. Ortho-K also The last decade has seen phenomenal growth in
attracted maverick practitioners, who brought a spirit of imaginative the technologies that impact orthokeratology
innovation to the world. “It has been my honor to have led several design. It’s difficult to comprehend how much
of these organizations and to have helped found the international progress has been made in such a short period
academy, which now spans the globe,” continued Dr. Herzberg. of time. Little more than a decade ago the
“Our mission is in part to help find solutions to the myopia epidemic FDA approved Bausch&Lomb’s Vision Shaping
which threatens the eye health of present and future generations”. Treatment (VST) for applications of low to
moderate myopia and astigmatism. This came
just a couple of years on the heels of the
certification of Paragon Vision Sciences’ CRT® designs, which pointed to potential ways these new appli-
contact lenses. What would prove even more cations would be possible.
significant was the approval of topographical
mapping, combined with CAD/CAM (computer- Hard as it is to believe, less than a decade ago Ortho-K was
aided design and computer-aided manufacturing) illegal in China. This was because of a laissez-faire attitude
technology for state-of-the-art Ortho-K lens and risks present in the care of lenses that existed at the
designing. This meant the imagination became time. Dozens of cases of corneal scarring with sight loss led
the limit for exciting new breakthroughs in ortho- to the government ban as the new century dawned. “Today, a
keratology. much different picture exists due to the regulation of the
industry and the elimination of questionable and dangerous
Having FDA approval of corneal reshaping was a behavior in the care of Ortho-K lenses,” Dr. Herzberg explains.
major advance, but what took place after was “The numbers coming out of China speak for themselves –
inspired by an industry poised to develop the over 1.5 million lenses have been fit with zero incidences of
vast potential promise that had been lying sight-threatening outcomes.” The Ortho-K environment in
dormant for decades. Almost ten years prior to the US has always been focused on safety first, and the expe-
the FDA’s decision new lens fabrication techno- riences there with corneal molding reflect that. In addition,
logies experienced a new era of accuracy in numerous studies have shown that risks inherent in wearing
producing products that had better process tole- Ortho-K lenses only at night are no more significant than with
rance than the equipment utilized to measure any soft lens worn overnight.
the human visual system for them. Along with
this was the use of computer-assisted lathing Most practitioners who perform corneal reshaping do so for
systems to make a reality of even the most com- myopia control. Surprisingly, the first landmark study
plex designs, themselves the product of powerful demonstrating this procedure was the one on Longitudinal
new technologies. The FDA approval allowed Orthokeratology Research In Children (LORIC) by Pauline
research and development to focus on more Cho a little more than a decade ago. Since its publication
accurate and faster procedures for the Ortho-K many more have been done providing an unequivocal answer
effect. At the same time, research and develop- to the growing myopia epidemic that affects young people,
ment of non-FDA approved areas – specifically damaging their visual system as they age. Along with low
high myopia and astigmatism – brought new dose atropine, bifocal soft contacts and a change in life-
investment and products. Lastly, developments style, Ortho-K is set to play a huge role going forward in
in hyperopia and presbyopia seemed more likely slowing down myopic progression and its sight-threatening
in light of recent success in more conventional complications.
“The International Academy of Orthokeratology (IAO) was founded The academy will place more emphasis on
five years ago in Orlando, Florida, at the fifth annual meeting of the research in the field of myopia control and
Orthokeratology Academy of America(OAA), which has since become Ortho-K in the next decade. Indeed, the
the American Academy of Orthokeratology & Myopia Control change in our name was only one small part in
(AAOMC),” says Herzberg. This year at the annual meeting of the IAO this process, as structurally the organization
in Gold Coast, Australia, the name will officially be changed to changed as well, opening up vast new funding
include the words myopia control. The organization is open to all resources for further research. “The future looks
disciplines that promise answers to the growing myopia epidemic especially bright – we will continue in our world-
afflicting present and future generations. Including myopia control wide efforts to help contain the disease of
was brought about by an over ninety percent approval rating in each myopia, which threatens the health and well-
of our five sections: Europe (EurOK), Latin America (ALOCM), being of our chil-dren,” concludes Dr. Herzberg.
Oceania (OSO), Asia (IAOA) and North America (AAOMC). Emphasis
on myopia control as well as Ortho-K has been a reality in the IAO The evidence-based effectiveness and safety
for the last five years, making the name change a mere formality. of orthokeratology
The academy over the years has remained in relative terms a group The role of peripheral refraction in myopia pro-
that is small in numbers but very influential and effective in achie- gression control and how the peripheral defocus
ving results. As an example, the concept of an international body to image influences eye growth has been studied
set standards of practice and oversee development worldwide for for the past decade (Smith EL, 2013).1 “The
Ortho-K was first proposed in 2002 at the first Global Orthokeratology development of animal models of refractive
Symposium (GOS) in Toronto, Canada. Over the next almost ten years errors has made a huge contribution to our
there were many efforts to launch such a group which ended in fai- understanding of the regulation of eye growth,”
lure. The first substantial talks, which related to bringing a worldwide explains Gonzalo Carracedo, OD, MsC, PhD,
organization into existence within our academy, took place in 2009 University Complutense of Madrid, Spain.
at an education meeting in Phoenix, Arizona. Despite many chal-
lenges, which caused previous efforts to fail, the group was launched This field has also generated a huge body of lite-
two years later. We expect exponential growth in the future, but we rature linking retinal defocus and eye growth.
will strive to retain the feel of a small and flexible organization, which The first evidence that visual experience has an
has served us so well in the past. influence on eye growth was discovered by
Wiesel and Raviola in 1977.2 They demonstrated (Smith EL, 2009).4 In humans, the role of the peripheral
that the sutured eyes of monkeys developed retina in relation to refractive error and eye growth has largely
myopia associated with expansion of the poste- been evaluated, with numerous studies examining the rela-
rior segment both equatorially and axially, tionship between foveal refraction and off-axis or peripheral
postulating that this was due to lack of a clear refraction (Flitcroft DI., 2012).5 Current research interest is
retinal image. The evidence that the peripheral centered heavily around the influence of peripheral refraction
retinal image can influence eye growth has on myopic progression. Based on this theory different optical
recently been provided by experiments in rhesus treatment strategies have been proposed and tested, and as
monkeys (Smith EL, 2005).3 These experiments with orthokeratology (Ortho-K), used to reshape the cornea of
demonstrated that deprivation of the peripheral a myopic eye.
retina can stimulate axial eye growth despite
normal central vision and indicates that There are several studies performed since 2004 linking ortho-
influences on the peripheral retina can outweigh keratology and myopia control. Walline et al. in the CRANYON
signals from the central retina. study found that children who wore orthokeratology for two
years showed less axial length growth and therefore less myo-
More recently lens-induced peripheral hyperopia pia progression (57%) than children who wore monofocal soft
has also been shown to produce central myopia contact lenses (Walline et al., 2009).6 However, the MICOS
well as light power could be participating in the com- 2. Wiesel T.N., Raviola E., Myopia and eye enlargement after neonatal lid fusion in monkeys, Nature 1977; 266,
66e68.
plex task to control eye growth. Moreover, these are just 3. Smith E.L., Kee C.S., Ramamirtham R., Qiao-Grider,Y., Hung L.F., Peripheral vision can influence eye growth
and refractive development in infant monkeys, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005; 46, 3965e3972.
the physical mechanisms, which trigger a biochemistry 4. Smith E.L., Hung L.F., Huang J., Relative peripheral hyperopic defocus alters central refractive development
signal pathway (Young et al., 2009).9 “In the coming in infant monkeys, Vision Res. 2009; 49, 2386e2392.
5. Flitcroft DI. The complex interactions of retinal, optical and environmental factors in myopia aetiology.
years, research should be focused on understanding the Prog Retin Eye Res. 2012;31:622-60.
whole mechanism (physical or optic and biochemical) 6. Walline J.J., Jones L.A., Sinnott L.T., Corneal reshaping and myopia progression, Br. J. Ophthalmol, 2009; 93,
1181e1185.
to develop better, more efficient solutions, to comple- 7. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Villa-Collar C, Gilmartin B, Gutierrez-Ortega R., Myopia control with orthokeratology
contact lenses in Spain: refractive and biometric changes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:5060-5.
tely halt the progression of myopia,” suggests Dr. 8. Solomon R, Donnenfeld ED, Azar DT, et al. Infectious keratitis after laser in situ keratomileusis:
Carracedo. In terms of the clinical challenges, the results of an ASCRS survey. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29(10):2001-2006.
9. Young T.L. Molecular genetics of human myopia: an update. Optom Vis Sci. 2009; 86:E8-E22
current question to answer is not if orthokeratology
controls myopia progression but when this treatment
must be applied. How much growth of myopia every
year is necessary to make orthokeratology treatment
mandatory? In this matter, clinicians should develop an
international protocol suggesting the best way to use
myopia control devices such as Ortho-K. •
A LOOK AT MYOPIA
RESEARCH IN CHINA
Wenzhou Medical University (WMU) is one of the leading educational and research medical
universities in China. Beyond its academic excellence and high-end medical services,
WMU is a leader in advanced research in ophthalmology and optometry.
Against the backdrop of an unprecedented rise in myopia in East Asia,
several research programs at WMU have been vigorously dedicated to furthering
understanding of the condition and developing new treatments for it.
This interview with Professor Lu Fan, the president of Wenzhou Medical University,
explores in depth the scope of the latest scientific and clinical efforts to slow down
the myopia pandemic.
KEYWORDS
Myopia, high myopia, myopia control, myopia management, dopamine
(DA), peripheral refraction errors, orthokeratology (Ortho-K), atropine,
outdoor activities, eyeglasses, contact lenses, myopia prevention, genetic
therapy, refractive surgery, keratoconus, posterior scleral reinforcement
(PSR), etiology, ocular bio-imaging.
The entire project of myopia research at WMU combines resources Progress is made step by step in the field of
from the eye hospital with those of the school of optometry and biochemical mechanisms for human myopia.
ophthalmology. The research fields cover clinical practices, genetic However, there is much still to be done. For
studies, biology, innovation in medicine, ocular imaging developments, example, the results of the animal model need to
etc. The top three research areas are: 1) fundamental research, be studied further when applied to human
including establishing animal models, dopamine effects and genetic beings. Myopia is not the outcome of a single
therapy, which are supported by the National Basic Research Program gene and pathway, and the potential target of
of China (973 Program); 2) clinical studies on the correlation of child pharmacological approach may need more
behavior and myopia, epidemiological investigations, myopic function detection. Therefore, a lot of work still has to be
changes and visual acuity after refractive surgery; 3) optometric done to develop an effective treatment for
interventions, such as optical corrections, rigid gas permeable (RGP) myopia.
lenses and orthokeratology, which are always the areas most beneficial
to the public. What are WMU’s key areas of research on
refractive surgery in myopia treatment?
What can be learned from research on biochemical mechanisms How would you define the key clinical
regarding myopia onset and its progression? challenges and post-operative concerns in
What are the perspectives for eye care professionals for a patients, especially those with high myopia?
potential pharmacological approach in myopia treatment?
The refractive surgery center at WMU’s eye
Although myopia is the most common human eye disorder in the hospital is one of the biggest and most important
world, the exact cause is still unclear. Myopia usually results from refractive surgery affiliations in China today.
inherited genes interacting with environmental factors. Multiple About five thousand patients undergo refractive
genetic myopic loci and pathways have been identified. The onset of surgery annually in our center. A full 98% are
myopia and its progression interact as an entity and a complex myopia patients. Among the myopia patients,
disorder. 88% are aged 20 to 30.
As to the key clinical challenges and post- also try surgery of posterior scleral reinforcement (PSR) for
operative concerns when it comes to refractive very high myopia control. The PSR aims to reduce the posterior
surgery, safety is the most important and segment structure changes induced by high myopia. We do
persistent issue. Although the techniques and find the PSR is helpful for delaying axial length elongation
surgical skills at the facility are mature and and improving visual acuity after surgery. Above all, high
advanced, there is still a small group of patients myopia and its complications are more likely to cause
that suffer from severe complications. One of the blindness. More efforts are being made with respect to
worst complications is keratoconus. The most refractive surgery to ensure visual health.
possible reason is that these patients are not
suitable candidates and they might already have There are many optical methods to correct and control
sub-clinical keratoconus before the refractive myopia progression in clinical settings. What is the current
surgery. Therefore, strict candidate screening is research focus with regard to optical solutions at WMU?
critical. Given this, we did research focusing on How will the latest findings in this area influence future
sub-clinical keratoconus filtering. Using the clinical practice?
study results, we built the diagnostic indices for
sub-clinical keratoconus detection. In addition, At WMU’s eye hospital, eyeglasses, soft contact lenses,
longitudinal parts are still ongoing to prove our daytime RGP lenses and orthokeratology (Ortho-K) are all
custom-designed indices can discriminate used for the correction of myopia in patients. One of the
effectively. We do hope the results will be helpful influential research areas is orthokeratology. The mechanism
when selecting candidates and improving safety. of how orthokeratology slows myopia progression is a hot
topic. According to our studies, wearing Ortho-K lenses over
In terms of the patients with high myopia, the long term can improve accommodation amplitude, change
intraocular refractive surgery is preferable to wavefront aberration and correct peripheral refractive errors.
surgery on the cornea. The anterior/posterior All factors combined together slow the axial length elongation,
chamber implantation of intraocular lenses which delays myopia progression.
(IOLs) might cause severe endothelial cell loss.
As a consequence, cataract surgery is more
recommended for the older patients with high
myopia. Moreover, monitoring the fundus
changes is quite important as well. Currently, we
In terms of the etiology, it is very complicated. Myopia is not only posture. Video games produce the shortest
caused by a hereditary factor, but it is also affected by environment working distance and the highest head tilt.
factors. A lot of different theories, such as genetic loci changes, RNA Illuminance and contrast significantly influence
alterations during the process of transcription and translation and near posture. The worst posture comes when
various pathways, have been constructed to interpret the occurrence there is low illumination and contrast. Thus,
of myopia. The most myopigenic condition is always the hereditary recommendations for parents should be: 1) work
one. A child with two myopic parents has a greater likelihood of being in a bright environment (≥ 300lux); 2) ensure a
myopic than a child with only one myopic parent. However, at present high contrast for the text when reading; 3) make
this cannot be controlled when the baby is born. Luckily, there are sure there is an adequate working distance,
some environmental factors that can be modified to postpone the especially for video games. In addition, the lens
onset of myopia and its progression, such as good reading habits, type, such as single vision lenses or progressive
enough outdoor activities and a healthy diet. addition lenses (PALs), and the near-phoria
status affected near vision posture. During
What are the key vision functions that have been studied in myopic reading, myopic esophoric children used a lower
children, and what specificities have already been uncovered portion of their PALs compared with exophoric
through WMU’s research? What do we know about the relationship children, resulting in greater addition power,
between visual and behavioral functions – such as posture – which might partially explain why myopic
in children with regard to myopia progression? children with near esophoria exhibited superior
treatment effects in myopia control clinical trials
The key vision function that we have studied is lag of accommodation. using PALs. Therefore, I think the near-work
Near vision posture is indirectly linked to myopia through lag of posture plays an important role in the
accommodation, peripheral defocus, light and contrast. Based on our development of myopia progression in children.
previous studies, tasks done at short distances significantly influence
FIG.1 The ocular OCT images and accommodation response curve. A represents the OCT
image of the anterior segment and lens; B is the OCT image of the ciliary body; and C is the
accommodation stimulus response curve. AS: accommodation stimulus; Latency: the time
accommodation starts from the point ACC (accommodation) stimulus is given; Peak velocity:
the speed required to reach the peak; Amplitude: the maximum amount of accommodation;
Bars = 500μm.
How can the research in ocular bio-imaging What are the key collaborative projects and partnerships
help better understand accommodation that WMU has initiated to accelerate research on myopia?
mechanisms in myopia onset, its progression
and its control in human eyes? Myopia research is a big project, including the mechanism,
What are the latest findings in this area? image recording, visual functions and corrections. We
collaborate with Prof. Xiongli Yang from the Chinese Academy
Ocular bio-imaging is helpful evidence in of Sciences on the myopic mechanism and pathway study and
researching accommodation mechanisms for Zeng Changqin from the Chinese Science Academy for
myopia. Using the custom-built optical studying the genetics of high myopia. Also, we work together
coherence tomography (OCT) system, the lens, with ESSILOR to study the visual function in myopic students.
ciliary body and anterior segment can be imaged
(Fig. 1-A, B). Combined with the open-filed Beyond research, how would you define the key educational
autorefractor and wavefront aberration system, challenges in optometry and ophthalmology with regard to
the accommodation function parameters and all myopia? How can education be helpful in growing eye care
the ocular aberration variations can be captured services and preventing the pandemic of myopia?
simultaneously. With this system, we keep
records of the accommodation response curves The way optometry and ophthalmology for myopia correction
for Ortho-K lens wearers (Fig 1-C). As a result, and treatment are studied needs to be rethought. Talented
the accommodation response speed and individuals with a medical background are the optimal
amplitude improves after three and five months. backups for specialized training. Both the clinical skills and
The long-term effects need to be studied further. human concerns are required for professional proficiency.
However, with the increasing demand of public eye care, system What, in your opinion, is the key role ophthalmic
training at present is still insufficient. Training for optometrists and clinicians (i.e. ophthalmologists, optometrists
ophthalmologists is desperately needed at different angles and levels. and optical dispensers) should be playing in
The standardized clinical flow, including the doctors, sales assistants, preventing the complications of high myopia?
dispensers and after-service staff, should be established as a team
work. A personalized and accurate prescription is the basic guarantee Ophthalmic clinicians working as a team is key to
of the entire process. Therefore, only when prevention, control and ensuring a high medical quality. Medical con-
treatment are based on high qualifications will myopia management sultation and specialized guidance at the hospital
reach a high standard. are the basis for managing high myopia. Patients
will then learn to step up their vigilance for the
What other initiatives do you believe are required to improve the complications of high myopia. It is a beneficial
level of public awareness and that of the public health services to way to guarantee timely awareness and treatment
reduce the rates of high myopia? for high myopia complications.
A commitment to public health by all of society will positively promote Where to next?
high myopia management. Enhancing the level of public education is What are the key areas in scientific research,
an essential step, and the participation of different media should be clinical practice and medical education with
encouraged. Combining the basic awareness of myopia with the regard to myopia in next decade?
elementary education of children is a critical step. Next, a basic
medical insurance system will bring the public a brand-new concept. We have already made big steps forward in myopic
The most significant way is to ensure primary eye care is covered by research and clinical work in the past decade. In
the basic medical insurance system. Once there is awareness of the coming future, medical education for
myopia, the appropriate medical advice and diagnosis can be ophthalmic clinicians must be a priority. China’s
provided. Lastly, establishing a triple-level patient transferring system rapid economic development means the need for
will support prompt treatment for high myopic patients when the primary eye care is growing fast. Strict and
complications and emergencies occur. standard training of myopia management is
critical. On the other hand, biochemical research
for the myopia pathogenic mechanism will
continue to be a hot topic. Transforming achie-
vements in the lab into clinical practice is the
ultimate goal of all researchers and physicians. •
There is evidence in many countries globally that the prevalence of myopia is on the rise.
Advances in measurement technology now allow many environmental factors potentially
associated with the development and progression of myopia to be quantified reliably and
sampled densely. Our recent prospective longitudinal study of Australian schoolchildren,
utilising wearable sensor technology has provided the first direct evidence of a significant
relationship between personal ambient light exposure and eye growth in childhood;
demonstrating that greater daily light exposure is associated with slower eye growth.
These findings support the potential for interventions aimed at increasing daily outdoor
light exposure, to reduce the development and progression of myopia in childhood.
R
ecent decades have seen a rapid rise in the
prevalence of myopia in many developed nations
around the world, with myopia prevalence levels
greater than 90% reported in young populations in some
developed Asian cities.1 Using modelling based upon the
current trends in myopia development and progression, a
Associate Professor Scott A. Read recent study predicted that around half of the world’s
Director of Research, population will be myopic, and that approximately 1 billion
Contact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory people worldwide will have high myopia (5.00 D or more)
Queensland University of Technology,
by the year 2050.2 The potential public health costs of
School of Optometry and Vision Science,
these rising levels of myopia (and associated increase in
Australia
high levels of myopia) are dramatic, given the known
Scott Read is an Associate Professor in the School association between myopia and many sight threatening
of Optometry and Vision Science at the Queensland eye diseases, such as retinal detachment, glaucoma and
University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. retinal degenerations that have all been linked to myopia
Since receiving his PhD in 2006, Scott has held a severity.3
variety of research and academic positions and has
published over 60 peer-reviewed research papers, This “myopia boom”4 therefore provides a strong catalyst
with the majority of this work focusing upon human for the development of reliable methods to reduce both
myopia. He recently received the “Zeiss Young the development and progression of myopia in the
Investigator Award in Myopia Research” for his population in order to limit the detrimental visual and
distinguished contributions to the myopia research public health effects of increasing levels of myopia. The
field. He has also been an Associate Editor for rapid increase in myopia prevalence in recent decades
Clinical and Experimental Optometry and acts as a points firmly towards a role for environmental influences
Topical Associate Editor for Optometry and Vision upon the development of myopia.5 However, the exact
Science. environmental factors involved in the regulation of eye
growth and the development and progression of myopia
are still not fully understood. A more comprehensive
understanding of the various factors impacting upon the
KEYWORDS
Myopia, light exposure, eye growth, outdoor activity, refractive error.
normal growth of the eye and hence the development and primates.10 In humans, evidence of a potential role of light
progression of myopia in childhood is likely to be critical exposure in myopia has arisen from a number of
for the development of effective myopia control epidemiological studies that have shown that children who
interventions. report spending greater time outdoors also exhibit a
significantly lower prevalence and incidence of myopia
A move to outdoors compared to children reporting less daily outdoor time
Over the years, a range of different environmental factors (see Sherwin et al11 for a review of recent studies examining
have been proposed as potentially playing a role in human the association between myopia and outdoor activities).
myopia development, with factors related to near-work, Childhood eye growth and myopia progression is also
education and academic achievement being a major focus known to vary according to the time of the year, with
of many studies.6 More recently, perhaps spurred on by the slower eye growth documented in summer months (where
sometimes equivocal findings of studies examining the more environmental light and thus opportunities to spend
association between myopia and near work, a shift in the time outdoors is available), and faster eye growth is
focus of refractive error research has occurred, with a documented in winter months (where less environmental
move away from traditional near work measures and a light is available).12
broader focus on additional potential environmental
factors (e.g. outdoor activities).7 Evidence has been Since spending time outdoors also typically involves
emerging from both human epidemiological studies, and exposure to high intensity outdoor light (often more than
research with animals, that ambient light exposure may be 100 times brighter than the typical indoor light levels), it
an important additional environmental factor that plays a has been hypothesised that the associations found
role in myopia. Animal studies demonstrate that normal between more outdoor activity and less myopia, support a
eye growth appears to be influenced by environmental potential role for light exposure in myopia development.13
light levels, since rearing young chickens in dim ambient However, it is important to note that the majority of the
light environments has been shown to result in more rapid previous studies examining outdoor activity and childhood
eye growth and the development of more myopic refractive myopia (and studies of seasonal variations in childhood
errors compared to rearing animals in bright ambient eye growth) have not objectively assessed the habitual
light conditions.8 Similarly, exposure to bright ambient ambient light levels experienced by the children in their
light conditions appears to block the development of studies. Instead, this previous work has relied upon
experimental (form deprivation) myopia in chickens9 and questionnaires to quantify children’s activities and make
FIG.1 Example of light exposure and physical activity recordings from a representative ROAM study participant over a single 24-hour
period (yellow line shows light exposure, black bars show physical activity and blue shading indicates sleep period overnight), derived from
the Actiwatch-2 devices worn on the non-dominant wrist and programmed to record data every 30 seconds. Each child in the study wore
the device continuously for two 14-day periods (separated by approximately 6 months) over the first 12 months of the ROAM study.
estimates of their daily outdoor time, which does not emmetropia (mean spherical equivalent refraction of
provide an objective assessment of light exposure. Based +0.35 ± 0.31 D). Each participant in the study had a
on this research it is difficult to know conclusively whether series of ocular measurements, including measures of
the mechanism underlying the protective effects of axial eye length collected every six months over the 18
outdoor activities is due to light exposure or another factor month study period. Additionally, objective measurements
related to being outdoors (e.g. more physical activity or of each child’s individual ambient light exposure and
less near focussing). physical activity were also collected twice in the first 12
months of the study (approximately six months apart).
Seeing the light These measures were collected using Actiwatch-2 devices
Our recent research, taking advantage of wearable light (Philips Respironics, USA), a wrist watch sized device that
sensor technology, has therefore aimed to improve our contains a light sensor and an accelerometer, programmed
understanding of the factors underlying eye growth and to collect simultaneous measures of ambient light
myopia in childhood by examining for the first time the exposure and physical activity every 30-seconds of the day
relationship between objectively measured ambient light over each of the two 14-day periods of sensor wear (Fig.
exposure and children’s eye growth. The Role of Outdoor 1). This represents over 80,000 individual measures of
Activity in Myopia study (ROAM study) was an 18-month light exposure and physical activity from each child over
prospective longitudinal study of eye growth in myopic and the course of the study. These measures allowed us to
non-myopic children. The experimental procedures and examine the potential association between longitudinal
outcomes from the ROAM study have been reported in changes in eye growth and children’s habitual ambient
detail in a number of recent publications.14-16 One hundred light exposure and physical activity.
and one children, aged between 10 and 15 years of age, Analysis of these densely sampled light exposure and
were enrolled in the study, including 41 myopic children physical activity data revealed differences in the typical
(mean spherical equivalent refraction -2.39 ± 1.51 D) and daily pattern of activities of the myopic and non-myopic
60 non-myopic children with refractive errors close to children in the study.14,15 Although the daily variations in
environmental light exposure and physical activity were slightly faster eye growth than girls). Additionally, axial eye
observed to closely follow the pattern of children’s typical growth was also significantly associated with the children’s
school day (with peaks in activity and light exposure found average daily light exposure, with lower daily light exposure
before and after school and during lunch breaks in the being associated with faster axial eye growth. To examine
school day), myopic children were found to exhibit the relationship between light exposure and eye growth in
significantly lower average daily light exposure compared more detail, the children in the study were further
to the non-myopic children, with the largest differences categorised (based upon a tertile split of their individual
being found at times immediately before and after school average daily light exposure levels, regardless of their
and at lunchtime (Fig. 2). This is indicative of less outdoor refractive status) as being habitually exposed to low,
activities for the myopic children over these times. moderate or high daily ambient light levels (Fig. 4).
Although there were trends observed for the myopic Children habitually exposed to low daily ambient light
children to also have slightly lower daily physical activity levels (who on average were exposed to only 56 minutes of
levels, differences associated with physical activity were bright outdoor light per day) were found to exhibit
not statistically significant. significantly faster axial eye growth. These analyses
included adjustments for refractive status, which suggests
The average axial eye growth observed in the myopic and that these effects of light exposure on eye growth are
non-myopic children in the study is illustrated in Figure 3. occurring independent of refractive error. Over the 18
Analysis of these data revealed a number of statistically months of the study, children exposed to low daily
significant predictors of eye growth in this population of light levels, exhibited approximately 0.1 mm greater eye
children, including the presence of myopia (where, as growth than children habitually exposed to moderate and
expected myopic children showed faster eye growth, high ambient light levels, which equates to a clinically
indicative of myopia progression in this group), younger significant ~0.3 D more myopic progression in refraction.
age (where younger children showed more rapid eye growth
than older children) and gender (where boys showed
FIG.3 Average axial eye growth observed over the 18 month study in the myopic and non-myopic children. Error bars represent standard
error of the mean. Linear mixed models analyses revealed that the presence of myopia, younger age, male gender and lower daily light
exposure were all significantly associated with the rate of axial eye growth.15
FIG.4 Average axial eye growth over the 18 month study after categorising children based upon their average daily light exposure as
being habitually exposed to high, moderate or low ambient light levels (regardless of their refractive status). Children exposed to low
daily light levels exhibited significantly faster eye growth. Error bars represent standard error of the mean.15
Conclusions
The work summarised in this article helps to improve our
understanding of the role of light exposure in the regulation
of human eye growth and refractive error development and
progression and supports the potential for future myopia KEY TAKEAWAYS
control interventions aiming to increase daily bright light
exposure. However, more research is still needed to further
• There is evidence of a rapid increase in myopia
our understanding of a range of aspects regarding light
exposure and myopia. These factors include the relative prevalence in recent decades in many developed
importance of the spectral composition of light, the countries.
optimum timing of light exposure and the specific intensity
of light that is most important in the regulation of human • An improved understanding of the environmental
eye growth. Additional knowledge from further research in factors underlying eye growth and myopia in
this field may allow more targeted myopia control
childhood is crucial for developing effective myopia
interventions to be developed in the future, which from the
perspective of myopia control, looks to be bright. • control interventions.
Acknowledgements: This work was supported by an • Recent work utilising wearable sensors
Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career demonstrates the first direct evidence of a
Research Award (DE120101434). I gratefully acknowledge relationship between lower daily light exposure
my co-investigators Michael Collins and Stephen Vincent
and faster axial eye growth.
for their contributions to the work presented in this paper.
REFERENCES 11. Sherwin JC, Reacher MH, Keogh RH, Khawaja AP, Mackey DA, Foster PJ. The association between time
spent outdoors and myopia in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology.
1. Jung S-K, Lee JH, Kakizaki H, Jee D. Prevalence of myopia and its association with body stature and 2012;119:2141-2151.
educational level in 19-year-old male conscripts in Seoul, South Korea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.
2012;53:5579-5583. 12. Donovan L, Sankaridurg P, Ho A, Chen X, Lin Z, Thomas V, Smith EL, Ge J, Holden B. Myopia progression
in Chinese children is slower in summer than in winter. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89:1196–1202.
2. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, Jong M, Naidoo KS, Sankaridurg P, Wong TY, Naduvilath TJ, Resnikoff S.
Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 13. Rose KA, Morgan IG, Ip J, Kifley A, Huynh S, Smith W, Mitchell P. Outdoor activity reduces the prevalence
2016;123:1036-1042. of myopia in children. Ophthalmology. 2008;115: 1279–1285.
3. Flitcroft DI. The complex interactions of retinal, optical and environmental factors in myopia aetiology. 14. Read SA, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ. Light exposure and physical activity in myopic and emmetropic children.
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2012;31:622-660. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91:330-341.
4. Dolgin E. The myopia boom. Nature. 2015;519: 276–278. 15. Read SA, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ. Light exposure and eye growth in childhood. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.
2015;56:3103-3112.
5. Morgan IG, Rose K. How genetic is school myopia? Prog Retin Eye Res. 2005; 24:1-38.
16. Read SA. Ocular and environmental factors associated with eye growth in childhood. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;
6. Morgan IG, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw S-M. Myopia. The Lancet. 2012;379:1739-1748. 93: 1031–1041.
7. Mutti DO, Zadnik K. Has near work’s star fallen? Optom Vis Sci. 2009; 86:76-78. 17. Wu P-C, Tsai C-L, Wu H-L, Yang Y-H, Kuo H-K. Outdoor activity during class recess reduces myopia onset
8. Cohen Y, Belkin M, Yehezkel O, Solomon AS, Polat U. Dependency between light intensity and refractive and progression in schoolchildren. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:1080-1085.
development under light-dark cycles. Exp Eye Res. 2011;92:40–46. 18. He M, Xiang F, Zeng Y, Mai J, Chen Q, Zhang J, Smith W, Rose K, Morgan IG. Effect of time spent outdoors
9. Ashby R, Ohlendorf A, Schaeffel F. The effect of ambient illuminance on the development of deprivation at school on the development of myopia among children in China: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA.
myopia in chicks. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:5348–5354. 2015;15:1142-1148.
10. Smith EL, Hung L-F, Huang J. Protective effects of high ambient lighting on the development of form
deprivation myopia in rhesus monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:421–428.
Many factors must be taken into account when controlling myopia progression.
There is no doubt genetics plays a role in the development of myopia in children.
But lifestyle is also an important factor to consider. In terms of safe and effective treatment,
orthokeratology is now known to be successful in controlling myopia and has even been
shown to slow down progression in individuals with high myopia. While it has developed
substantially in Latin America, it is effectively mainstream in the US and a common
treatment in China, where there are numerous orthokeratology clinics in city hospitals.
Currently, orthokeratology is also on the rise in Europe.
T
here has been a tremendous increase over the past
few decades in the prevalence of myopia worldwide.
Dr. Bruce T. Williams,
Practitioners are more and more concerned with
OD, FIAO, Seattle, USA
regard to the increased incidence of patients moving
into the category of high myopia. The ocular health
consequences of sequelae related to high myopia can be
Dr. Sergio Garcia, devastating in later life. Many clinicians are implementing
O.D., optometrist Mscv and a systematic approach to establish a control protocol for
Faculty, Universidad de La Salle their patients with rapidly progressing myopia.
Bogotá, Colombia
A comparative survey of methods for controlling
Dr. Javier Prada, progressive myopia
O.D., optometrist director of the “Looking at ways to manage progressive myopia first
ophthalmology program at the requires identifying those who are at highest risk,” explains
University of Costa Rica and vice- Dr. Bruce T. Williams, OD, FIAO. Some of the risk factors
president of ALOCM, Costa-Rica include whether or not one or both parents are myopic,
especially if one or both are highly myopic. Other factors
to consider are myopic siblings or a family history of ocular
Dr. Dennis Leung, disease associated with myopia. Ethnicity is important, as
O.D., FIAO, California, USA the literature shows us that Asians are at a much higher
risk.
Most children should reach emmetropia by the age of Soft multifocal lenses have recently shown promise but
eight-years-old. A six-to-eight-year-old child at approxi- have some disadvantages, such as blurred distance vision
mately -1.00 diopter will typically add a half diopter per and dryness, not to mention they limit some of the
year and end up at -5.00 to -6.00 by the mid-teens. It is activities in which children can participate.
important to initiate a protocol to limit the progression of
myopia. By reducing the rate of progression by 1/3, you Orthokeratology has consistently been shown to reduce the
reduce the likelihood of the individual developing high progression by approximately 45%.12 Orthokeratology has
myopia by 70%. If you can reduce the rate by 50%, the the advantage of only being worn overnight while sleeping.
likelihood is reduced by 90%. Parents are usually there to supervise insertion and
removal, and the child wears no lenses while at school
When designing a strategy to develop a protocol for myopia during the day. Orthokeratology sets up a unique
prevention, encouraging the patient and parents to topographical shape on the anterior cornea. The central
incorporate beneficial lifestyle changes should be the first cornea is flattened to focus on the fovea, and the mid-
priority. The practitioner can then look at the available peripheral cornea is steepened to create a myopic defocus
options for implementing a plan for the individual. We on the peripheral retina, reducing the stimulus of the
know that correcting the refractive error with traditional normal hyperopic defocus for axial elongation and
single vision spectacle lenses or regular soft/rigid contact subsequent increases in myopia (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2).
lenses will inherently cause more peripheral hyperopic
defocus, encouraging axial elongation and an increase in By designing lenses with specific optic zone diameters,
myopia. radii and reverse curve radii and widths, effective treatment
can be accomplished for most minus refractive errors and
Progressive addition lenses have been shown to reduce astigmatic components. Fortunately, the positive effect of
progression by 14% (and up to 37.2% in esophoric myopia control is even greater for patients that have
children, with high lags of accommodation when compared already progressed to higher states of myopia. This
to the regular single vision lens group).9 This is certainly procedure can literally stop further progression of those
an alternative, but it is not as effective as we would like. already in the category of high myopia.
The industry is working on developing executive-style
bifocals that contain a prismatic component, which makes The following pictures show the axial (Fig. 3) and
them a more effective spectacle lens alternative (they tangential (Fig. 4) topographical plots of a high myope.
show three-year results of myopia progression reduction of Note the area under the reverse curve is much steeper and
51% when compared to regular single visions lenses).10 rises above the original reference sphere, producing a
peripheral add power of well over the recommended
Pharmacological intervention has had a profound effect. It minimum of +4.00 diopters. This produces a substantial
is as much as 90% effective in reduction rates.11 There myopic peripheral defocus to eliminate the stimulus for
are certainly concerns, especially in children, when axial elongation and progressive myopia.
starting with pharmaceutical agents. A six-year-old child
on anti-muscarinic drug therapy for the next 12 years The advantages of orthokeratology over other forms of
could face serious unknown consequences. Proper dosage myopia prevention are clear and numerous. It has proven
for safe and effective treatment has not been firmly to be safe and effective when compared to all forms of
established, and there are reports of a significant rebound contact lens wear. Even in cases where full myopic
effect after discontinuation. correction could not be achieved, the rate of progression
has been slowed by greater than 50%, as in a study vision impairment worldwide.14 He also noted that it was
published by Pauline Cho at Hong Kong Polytechnic the second most common cause of blindness. This is
University.13 The child has parental supervision; the lenses estimated to cost US$202 billion per annum. That said,
are only worn in a closed eye environment, reducing the what are rank-and-file eye care professionals doing to
chance for loss or foreign body involvement. The child is address the problem? “If any one of us had a patient
free to participate in swimming and all kinds of activities sitting in the chair with a known sight-threatening
that might be limited by the use of other solutions. condition, which was in anyway treatable, would we tell
them that we were going to cover the symptoms and just
Orthokeratology should be presented to all young patients watch the condition progress until it reached the end
with progressive myopia as the safest and most effective point? Of course not. Yet this is what many of us are doing
strategy to reduce the progression of myopia to proven today,” explains Dr. Williams.
“safe” levels. If that turns out not to be accepted, then
other forms should be presented as well. Some form of The worldwide epidemic of progressive myopia is gaining
progressive myopia reduction should become the standard strength every day. In the article “Global Prevalence of
of care for these patients to reduce the possibility of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000
eventual sight-threatening complications. through 2050,”15 authors stated: “Myopia and high
myopia estimates from 2000 to 2050 suggest significant
Latest achievements in orthokeratology increases in prevalence globally, with implications for
In 2010, Bourne et.al estimated that 108 million people planning services, including managing and preventing
were affected by myopia, making it the leading cause of myopia-related ocular complications and vision loss among
FIG. 3 Axial difference topography map of post Ortho-K cornea showing -7.25D refractive FIG. 4 Tangential difference topography map of post Ortho-K cornea showing -7.25D
change. refractive change.
address nearly every scenario that is presented. Designs Medellin in 2015) reported on 50 patients, with an
that correct low myopia and high myopia, astigmatism and average of 20/20 for both eye and without infections.
mixed astigmatism, hyperopia and ectasia. We can
produce lenses that have toric base curves, toric alignment The academy is working on statistics and screening in the
curves, oval treatment zones and varied return zone different countries to develop a Latin American sample
depths. The reverse geometry lenses have moved from the census of the percentage of the prevalence of myopia.
original 3 curve designs to 4, 5 and 6 curves. There are This will help prevention and treatment with different
computer-assisted programs that import topographies and methods to avoid a rise in high myopia in the future.
design lenses to align up to 8 semi-meridians of the
cornea to optimize the fluid forces behind the lens for Ortho-K in the US & China
maximum treatment. There is work going on to decenter In the United States, the FDA approved nightwear Ortho-K
the treatment zone to align better with the line of sight by Paragon CRT in June 2002. Since then, Ortho-K has
instead of the geometric center of the cornea so as to become a mainstream practice in optometry. Today, there
reduce induced astigmatism and higher order aberrations. are thousands of Ortho-K fitters that use CRT lenses and
also other innovative Ortho-K designs such as GOV, Ortho-
As the technology advances so will our ability to design tools and Wave, to name a few. Many experienced Ortho-K
lenses that do the best job possible to retard the specialists find that by the off-label use of these other
progression of myopia, increasing the odds of sparing the designs, they can correct the degree of myopia at a much
vision of so many. higher range than that approved for CRT lenses. It is not
unusual for a patient with myopia of 8 diopters or even
Ortho-K in Latin America higher to see 20/20 after just one week of treatment
In Latin America, orthokeratology (Ortho K) formally began using these custom designed lenses.
to be practiced after the first global Ortho-K meeting held
in Toronto, Canada in 2002. A small group of innovators The American Academy of Ortho-K and Myopia Control
from different countries, including Mexico, Guatemala, also fuels the enthusiasm for use of Ortho-K in the US,
Costa Rica, Colombia, Venezuela, Uruguay, Chile and and there are more than 500 members. Each year, the
Brazil, went and participated in the first meetings, academy hosts the Vision By Design (VBD) conference in
although only few of them decided in the coming years to different locations around the country. The next VBD will
offer the treatment to patients. This was mostly due to the be held in April 2017 in Dallas, Texas; the event is
lack of digital or CNC (Computer Numerical Control) lathes expected to attract hundreds of old and new Ortho-K
in Latin America needed to produce the lenses, which fitters. They will learn and share knowledge about fitting
have a reversed curve (they cannot be manufactured with techniques and concepts regarding myopia control and
common lathes). prevention. Custom soft lenses and diluted Atropine
treatment have been introduced in recent years at VBD,
Today, there are have fitters in Mexico, Guatemala, Costa which adds more tools to address the growing trends in
Rica, Colombia, Peru, Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay and myopia.
Chile, although recent studies from the one-year-old
Academia Latino Americana de Ortho K y Control de On the opposite side of the globe in Asia and the Pacific
Miopia (ALOCM), showed that the most cases fitted and Rim, due to the large percentage and high degree of
currently in use are in Costa Rica and Colombia, with myopia among Asians, Ortho-K is most often promoted as
around one thousand patients using the treatment with a means of myopia control. In China, a large number of
success. hospitals in all of the major cities have specialized
Ortho-K clinics. The number of patients successfully
Evidence has been provided for both countries that the treated by Ortho-K is greater than that in the rest of the
orthokeratology is a safe treatment, with an about 55% world. However, due to government restrictions, many
rate of myopia progression control (three- year study by new design innovations available in US are not available
Javier Prada et al. in Costa Rica, presented at WCO in in China. Other countries in the Pacific Rim where
REFERENCES 10. Cheng D, Woo GC, Drobe B, Schmid KL. Effect of bifocal and prismatic bifocal spectacles on myopia
progression in children: three-year results of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014
1. Sherwin JC, Reacher MH, Keogh RH, Khawaja AP, Mackey DA, Foster PJ. The association between time Mar;132(3):258-64.
spent outdoors and myopia in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology.
2012;119:2141-2151. 11. W. Chua; V. Balakrishnan; D. Tan; Y. Chan; ATOM Study Group, Efficacy Results from the Atropine in the
Treatment of Myopia (ATOM) Study, nvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003, Vol.44, 3119.
2. Rose KA, Morgan IG, Ip J, Kifley A, Huynh S, Smith W, Mitchell P. Outdoor activity reduces the prevalence
of myopia in children. Ophthalmology. 2008;115: 1279–1285. 12. Sun Y, Xu F, Zhang T, Liu M, Wang D, Chen Y, Liu Q. Correction: Orthokeratology to Control Myopia
Progression: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 11;10(6):e0130646.
3. Read SA, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ. Light exposure and physical activity in myopic and emmetropic children.
Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91:330-341. 13. Cho P, Cheung SW. Retardation of myopia in Orthokeratology (ROMIO) study: a 2-year randomized clinical
trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53: 7077-85
4. Read SA, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ. Light exposure and eye growth in childhood. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.
2015;56:3103-3112. 14. Bourne RR, Stevens GA, White RA, et al., Causes of vision loss worldwide, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis.
The Lancet Global Health 2013; 1(6):e339–49..
5. Read SA. Ocular and environmental factors associated with eye growth in childhood. Optom Vis Sci.
2016; 93: 1031–1041. 15. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al. Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends
from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology 2016.
6. Wu P-C, Tsai C-L, Wu H-L, Yang Y-H, Kuo H-K. Outdoor activity during class recess reduces myopia onset
and progression in schoolchildren. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:1080-1085. 16. Sun J, Zhou J, Zhao P, Lian J, et al., High Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia in 5060 Chinese University
Students in Shanghai, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53(12):7504-9.
7. He M, Xiang F, Zeng Y, Mai J, Chen Q, Zhang J, Smith W, Rose K, Morgan IG. Effect of time spent outdoors
at school on the development of myopia among children in China: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 17. Jeffrey J. Walline, Myopia Control with Corneal Reshaping Contact Lenses, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012,
2015;15:1142-1148. Vol.53, 7086.
8. Jin JX, Hua WJ, et al., Effect of outdoor activity on myopia onset and progression in school-aged children 16. Sun J, Zhou J, Zhao P, Lian J, et al., High Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia in 5060 Chinese University
in northeast china: the sujiatun eye care study, BMC Ophthalmology. 2015 Students in Shanghai, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53(12):7504-9.
9. Gwiazda JE, Hyman L, Norton TT, et al.; COMET Group. Accommodation and related risk factors associated 17. Jeffrey J. Walline, Myopia Control with Corneal Reshaping Contact Lenses, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012,
with myopia progression and their interaction with treatment in COMET children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Vol.53, 7086.
Jul;45(7):2143-51.
KEYWORDS
High myopia, pathological myopia, retinopathy, maculopathy, vision loss, visual
acuity, contrast sensitivity, night vision, glare, recovery time from glare, quality
of life, refraction, special lenses, lenticular lens, myopic rings, accommodation,
minification effect.
I
n recent years, the prevalence of myopia has been 1 Visual concerns of high myopia
increasing in all regions of the world. As reported in
many studies, myopia’s pandemic trends are putting 1.1. Reduced visual acuity
researchers, clinicians and the industry of ophthalmic One of the difficulties frequently encountered by highly
optics on the alert. Two aspects are emphasized in the myopic people is the difficulty to read small print, despite
mid-term projections: the number of people affected by wearing optimal correction. Karen Rose2 measured the
myopia worldwide will increase steadily and, among them, maximum acuity attained by 120 subjects with various
the proportion of cases with high myopia is also going to degrees of myopia, which was offset by their usual
increase. Thus, the prevalence of myopia (individuals with correction (contact lenses, eyeglasses, etc.). The results
mild to high myopia) in the world’s population could reach showed an average loss of two acuity lines on a logarithmic
25% by 2020 and nearly 50% by 2050, and the average scale (0.2 on the Minimum Angle of Resolution [MAR]
prevalence of high myopia (over -5.00 D) would increase log) between medium myopia (-1.50 to -3.75) and high
from 2.7% to almost 10% by 2050.1 In other words, myopia (beyond -10.00 D), objectifying the subjects’
myopic individuals would account for five billion people in problems.
2050 and highly myopic individuals would account for
one billion people (Fig. 1). These figures show the 1.2. Reduced contrast sensitivity
significance of the phenomenon that is now considered a The Melbourne Department of Optometry and Vision
major public health problem, and compel us to better Sciences3 has measured the contrast sensitivity of various
understand the day-to-day discomfort felt by slightly and myopic subjects. Even after adjusting for the lenses’
highly myopic people so as to improve their eye care minification effect, the contrast sensitivity determined for
management. the 10 most myopic subjects (greater than -4.00 D)
appears worse than for the others (Fig. 2). This explains
the difficulty of deciphering low contrast characters, which
is necessary in everyday life – when reading certain forms
or newspapers, for example. This shows us the importance
of measuring contrast sensitivity during a patient’s visual
management in order to offer the proper solutions:
for example, adding additional lighting can be useful,
since it allows for an increase in the apparent contrast of
objects viewed.
threshold level authorizing vision), he decreased ambient 1.5. Decline in the quality of life and social impact
lighting until the subjects indicated that they could The VF-14 (result between 0-100) and the VQOL (0-5) are
no longer see the target. The procedure to measure two questionnaires on quality of life that have been
the thresholds of vision under glare was identical by completed by subjects with different degrees of myopia.2
simply adding a glare source. Results showed The results showed that the highest myopia levels are
more significant vision thresholds for myopic than for directly associated with lower general satisfaction in the
hyperopic subjects (Fig. 3), which shows a relative achievement of all day-to-day living activities due to visual
weakness in the adaptability of myopic subjects at difficulties, particularly when driving. The study of these
different light levels. questionnaires reveals that the difficulties are not only
visual, but also concern aesthetics, practical and financial
Mean Night Vision and Glare Vision thresholds (cd/m )
Defocalization
FIG. 6 V
ariation in the correction of myopia with the vertex distance (d). The lens movement from L0 to L1 causes defocusing. The focal length of the corrective
lens becomes ƒ´L1 > ƒ´L0. To compensate myopia, the power should be decreased if the lens is closer to the eye.
CLINIC
atient. Enfin, pour confirmer la
re-œil sera systématiquement
uée.
iaux » pour
Facet
Edge
Optical zone
Concave
Concaveglass lenswith
glass lens with
concave edge facet and
Concave glass lens with convex Sharp edge Smoothed edge
concave edge facet and
smoothed edge
edge facet smoothed edge
FIG. 8 Concave lenticular lens
The goal of using lenticular lenses is to reduce the thickness of the lenses without limiting the visual comfort of the
wearer. Indeed, optical apertures that are too small hinder visual comfort. Conversely, optical apertures that are too
big unnecessarily increase thickness. To manage this compromise, it is useful to determine the optimum diameter for
the optical zone.
The visual comfort is linked to the angular object field available behind the lens, which typically needs to be +- 30°
for the central optical field. Depending on the wearer’s individual habits, it is necessary to consider a certain margin
when defining this central optical field.
Once determined, the target object half-field, the diameter of the useful optical zone, can be calculated. It is
a function of the distance of the lens to the eye’s center of rotation to the lens (LQ’) and the power of the lens P.
The results are summarized in Table I.
The temporal field is the most compelling: in case of astigmatism, the P power to be used for the calculation is the
power of the 0°-180° meridian.
C.Franchi nov.2015
Table I. Diameter that has to be given to the optical zone (ZO) depending on the lens power (P) to get an object
half-field of ω.
6. Vision of a person with high myopia that has been -20.00 D myopia, who would apparently accommodate to
corrected with ophthalmic lenses 5.00 D to focus at an object 20 cm from his or her glasses,
actually accommodates to approximately 3.10 D if the
During the optical correction of high myopia, several lens is placed at 12 mm from the eye. Similarly, although
specific optical phenomena occur.15, 16 They can be it seems as though such patients converge substantially to
summarized as follows: look 20 cm away, their convergence effort is actually
much less due to the basic internal prismatic effects
6.1. Lesser accommodation and lesser convergence provided by their lenses at near vision.
Through his or her ophthalmic lenses, a highly myopic
person will accommodate and converge less than would an 6.2. Reduced visual acuity
emmetropic or hyperopic person and less than if fitted With high myopia, the vertex distance causes a minification
with contact lenses. Indeed, the vertex distance plays effect (reduction in size) in both the images seen by
a significant role, and its effects are all the more significant wearers through their lenses and the wearer’s eyes as seen
when the power is strong. For example, a person with by other people. Due to this reduction in size, wearers with
FIG. 9 Calculation of the lens’ minification effect (left) and perceived reduction of eyes’ size in highly myopic wearers (right).
high myopia usually have significantly lower visual acuity 6.3. Peripheral image duplication
with ophthalmic lenses than with contact lenses. The Image duplication occurs at the edge of lenses with strong
minification effect, mainly caused by the vertex distance, negative power. Indeed, the last beam of light passing
is given by the following formula: through the lens is refracted towards the outside and the
first external beam of light on the outside of the lens is not
M = 1 / (1 – d x P) refracted. The same object is thus seen twice, once sharply
within the lens and once blurred on the outside of the
where d = vertex distance and P = power of the lens (Fig. lens. For the wearer, this means that the peripheral image,
9). or its perception, is doubled at the edge of the lens (or the
edge of the central optical zone), especially if the edge of
For example, for a -20.00 D lens placed at 12 mm, the the frame is thin or missing (rimless frames or those with
minification effect is about 20%. Accordingly, if a a nylon thread).
patient’s maximum acuity was 20/20 with contact lenses,
it may only be 20/25 with eyeglasses simply due to this 6.4. Phenomenon of the myopic rings
optical effect. That is one reason why opticians should One of the particularities of the correction of high myopia
always seek a frame that is positioned closer to the with ophthalmic lenses is the emergence of unsightly
patient’s eyes to minimize this effect as much as possible. rings on the periphery of the lens, which are more visible
As it has already been reminded, it is imperative to validate when looking at the wearer sideways. These rings are
refraction specifically for that particular vertex distance. the images at the edge of the lens reflected multiple times
on the front and back of the lens. Polishing the lens
edge and/or reducing the optical aperture considerably
To remember: decreases them.
• The magnification/minification effect changes with 7. The convenience of special lenses for high myopia
the vertex distance.
• The closer the lens is to the eye, the weaker the Surgical treatment or contact lenses cannot be used for all
effect is. highly myopic patients, and ophthalmic lenses are still
• Effect on visual acuity: VA is lower with eyeglasses relevant for high myopia. A wide range of lenses with
than with contact lenses for someone with high powers commonly reaching -40.00 D in single vision
myopia. lenses and -25.00 D in progressive lenses are available,
and the technical know-how of the lens manufacturer
can go even further. Recently, a record -108.00 D myopia
Minification Vertex distance Minification was corrected with ophthalmic lenses by an alliance of
effect for a lens (mm) effect for a lens French-Slovak experts.17 With careful, precise imple-
power -10.00 D power -20.00 D mentation by the optician, the wearer benefits from a
comfortable visual experience. These special lenses,
0.909/-9.3% 10 mm 0.833/-16.7% meant for extreme prescriptions, remain insufficiently
known of and used by eye care professionals, and would
0.893/-10.7% 12 mm 0.806/-19.4% be of great service to the highly myopic population, which
continues to grow in numbers.
0.877/-12.3% 14 mm 0.781/-21.9%
0.762/-13.8% 16 mm 0.757/-24.3%
8. Conclusion
The number of young and old people with high myopia will
increase in the future. Their care requires precise
measurement of several visual functions and under various KEY TAKEAWAYS
conditions in order to understand the origin of their
discomfort. It is also necessary to carefully study all the
parameters affecting the final refraction, from the visual • The specific needs of highly myopic people require
exam to the adaptation of the optical equipment. Moreover, special attention from visual health specialists.
it seems imperative to study the difficulties patients
encounter in their entirety in order to offer comprehensive, • The main discomforts of those with high
multidisciplinary care. • myopia include:
- Reduced visual acuity
- Reduced sensitivity to contrast
- Deteriorated vision thresholds under low
REFERENCES
1. Holden B, Fricke T, Wilson D, et al. Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000
and bright lights
through 2050; Ophthalmology, 2016. - Elongation of recovery time after glare
2. Rose K, Harper R, Tromans C. Quality of life in myopia, Br. J. Ophthalmol, 2000.
3. Jaworski A, Gentle A, Zele AJ, Vingrys AJ, McBrien NA, Altered Visual Sensitivity in Axial High Myopia: A Local
- Decline in quality of life and social impact.
Postreceptoral Phenomenon?, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2006.
4. Mashige K, Night vision and glare vision thresholds and recovery time in myopic and hyperopic eyes; African Vision
and Eye Health 2010, S Afr Optom. • High myopia is often associated with risks
5. Verkicharla PL, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM. Current and predicted demographics of high myopia and an update of its
associated pathological changes, Ophtalmologic & physiological optics. 2015
of high visual impairment and eye diseases such
6. Wong TY et al. Epidemiology and disease burden of pathologic myopia and myopic choroidal neovascularization: as retinopathy and maculopathy (staphylomas,
an evidence-based systematic review. Am J Ophthalmol, 2014.
7. Ohno-Matsui K, Kawasaki R, Jonas JB et al. International photographic classification and grading system for myopic
atrophic lesions, chorioretinal cracks, choroidal
maculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol, 2015.
neovascularization, macular degeneration,
8. Morgan IG1, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM. Myopia. Lancet. 2012 May 5; 379 (9827): 1739-48.
9. Pan CW, Cheng CY, Saw SM, Wang JJ, Wong TY. Myopia and age-related cataracts: a systematic review and meta-
glaucoma, etc.).
analysis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov; 156(5): 1021-1033.
Doctor Monica Jong is a senior research Prof. Padmaja Sankaridurg is Program An academic, researcher, educator and
fellow at the Brien Holden Vision Institute Leader, Myopia Program at the Brien internationally celebrated public health
and her clinical research is focussed on Holden Vision Institute. She was awarded leader, Prof. Kovin Naidoo has been
myopia control and high myopia. her B.Opt degree from the Elite School of revolutionising access and delivery to eye
She received her optometry degree and Optometry, Chennai, India in 1989, Ph.D care for the disadvantaged throughout the
PhD from the University of Melbourne, in 1999 from the University of New South world. A powerful public health advocate,
and her thesis examined the relationship Wales, Australia and MIP in 2012 from he has devoted his working life to reducing
between retinal structure and retinal University of Technology, Australia. After avoidable blindness and vision impairment,
function in retinitis pigmentosa using OCT. working for a number of years at the L.V. with specific emphasis on refractive error.
She was also the recipient of the David and Prasad Eye Institute, India as the Chief
Sandra Smith Fellowship which allowed her of Contact Lens Services, she took up a Professor Naidoo is the CEO of the Brien
to pursue her postdoctoral studies in ocular position at the Brien Holden Vision Institute Holden Vision Institute and Chairperson of
blood flow imaging in Type 2 diabetes (formerly the Institute for Eye Research) the International Agency for the Prevention
at the Department of Ophthalmology, and the Vision Cooperative Research of Blindness (Africa), Associate Professor
University Health Network, University of Centre. of Optometry at the University of KwaZulu-
Toronto. Some of Monica’s activities at the She is also a Conjoint Professor at the Natal (UKZN), and Adjunct Faculty at Salus
Brien Holden Vision Institute include School of Optometry and Vision Science, University in Philadelphia. He is also a
managing the analysis of the Zhongshan University of New South Wales, Australia. Vision Impact Institute advisory board
Opthalmic Center (ZOC) and BHVI high She has been actively researching myopia member.
myopia database in China, advocating for for approximately 12 years. In addition, she He has published extensively in
the recognition of high myopia as a cause is also involved in post graduate supervision epidemiology and public health.
of blindness through her role in the and manages the Intellectual Property
International Agency for the Prevention of portfolio of the Institute. She has over
Blindness (IAPB). 50 articles in peer reviewed journals.
KEYWORDS
myopia, high myopia, vision impairment, myopic macular degeneration,
myopia control, myopia management, public health issue
I
n recent times, the issue of myopia has featured heavily High myopia (≤ - 7.90 D) in the USA has already increased
in mainstream media with headlines such as “the 8-fold over 30 years from 0.2% to 1.6%.4 In 18-year-old
myopia boom”1 and “night time contact lenses stop Taiwanese students, 21.0% had high myopia (≤ -6.00 D)
children becoming short-sighted”.2 The growing concern in 2000 compared with 10.9% in 1983.6 Globally in
surrounding myopia has already led to governments in 2000, most people with myopia were below age 40, and
some parts of the world taking measures to ameliorate this little myopia was seen in those over 40. By 2030, the
problem. In Taiwan, a law was passed “banning too much prevalence of myopia is projected to be approximately
screen time,” and public health campaigns in Singapore 50% for all age groups above 20 years, and by 2050 to
encouraged children to spend more time outdoors. Given 68%7 (Fig. 2). Regions with traditionally little myopia,
these messages, we may be left wondering about the size such as Eastern Europe and Southern Africa will also see
of the burden of myopia, and the strategies and/or a large shift towards myopia in the near future, approaching
solutions required to reduce it. prevalences of 50% and 30% by 2050. This is likely due
to lifestyle changes as a result of urbanisation and
development (Fig. 3).3
The size of the problem
Recent work from the Brien Holden Vision Institute What are the consequences?
estimates that the prevalence of myopia (≤ -0.50 D) will Uncorrected refractive error is the leading cause of
increase worldwide, from 28% (2 billion) of the global distance vision impairment globally, affecting 108 million
population in 2010, to nearly 50% (5 billion) of the world people, and is the second most common cause of global
population by 2050. As a consequence, the prevalence of blindness.8 The economic burden of uncorrected distance
high myopia (≤ -5.00D) is also likely to increase from 4% refractive error was estimated to be US$202 billion per
(277 million) in 2010, to nearly 10% (1 billion) by the annum, of which myopia is the main cause.9 With the
year 2050.3 Figure 1 illustrates the prevalence of myopia rising prevalence of myopia, the economic burden of
and high myopia from 2000 through to 2050. uncorrected refractive error associated with myopia will
rise. In addition, myopia is associated with ocular
The shift towards myopia complications such as myopic macular degeneration,
The shift towards myopia has been rapid in some parts of retinal detachment, cataract and glaucoma, which impose
the world, such as the USA, where the prevalence of a significant health and economic burden. Myopic macular
myopia increased from 26% to 42% from 1972 to 2004.4 degeneration is already a frequent cause of vision
In Singapore, the prevalence of myopia was 47% in adults impairment in Japan,10 China,11 Netherlands12 and
in their 20s, and 26% in adults in their 50s.5 Denmark13. It is important to note that any level of myopia
3 000
34.0%
2 500
28.3%
2 000
22.9%
1 500
9.8%
1 000 7.7%
6.1%
5.2%
500 4.0%
2.7%
0
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Year
FIG. 1 T
he estimated global prevalence of myopia and high myopia per decade from 2000 to 2050 based on
current trends. The number of people in millions is listed on the y-axes. Adapted from Holden et al.3
70,0
65,5 65,7 65,3
63,6
62,2
60,7 59,8 59,8
60,0
50,0
40,0
Prevalence (%)
30,8
30,0
20,0
10,0
0,0
10 to 19 20 to 29 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 59 60 to 69 70 to 79 80 to 89 90+
Age groups
FIG. 2 T
he global generational shift in myopia indicates that in the earlier decades of 2000 up to 2030, the majority of myopia is occurring in
those under forty years with little myopia seen in those over forty. After 2030, the prevalence of myopia will be affecting all age groups.
Adapted from Holden et al.3
70
66,4
65,3 2000 2030 2050
62
60 58,4
56,2
55,1
54,1 53,4
52,2 53
51,7
50,7 50,4 50,7
50 47,4
40
Prevalence %
30,2
30 27,9
26,8
23,8
22,7
20
10
FIG. 3 The increasing prevalence of myopia estimated across the world from the year 2000 to 2050. Modified from Holden et al. 2016.3
REFERENCES
1. Dolgin E. The myopia boom. Nature 2015;519:276-8.
2. Knapton S. Night time contact lenses stop children becoming short-sighted. In: Telegraph T, ed.2015.
3. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al. Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends
from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology 2016.
4. Vitale S, Sperduto RD, Ferris FL, 3rd. Increased prevalence of myopia in the United States between 1971-
1972 and 1999-2004. Archives of ophthalmology 2009;127:1632-9.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
5. Pan CW, Dirani M, Cheng CY, Wong TY, Saw SM. The age-specific prevalence of myopia in Asia: a meta-
analysis. Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry
2015;92:258-66.
6. Lin LL, Shih YF, Hsiao CK, Chen CJ. Prevalence of myopia in Taiwanese schoolchildren: 1983 to 2000.
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2004;33:27-33. • The prevalence of myopia and high myopia is on the
7. Wilson DA, Jong M, Sankaridurg P, Fricke TR, Resnikoff S, Naidoo K. A global generational shift in myopia.
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology. Seattle, USA2016. rise across the world.
8. Bourne RR, Stevens GA, White RA, et al. Causes of vision loss worldwide, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis.
The Lancet Global health 2013;1:e339-49.
9. Fricke TR, Holden BA, Wilson DA, et al. Global cost of correcting vision impairment from uncorrected refractive
error. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2012;90:728-38. • Estimates suggest that by 2050, five billion (50%)
10. Iwase A, Araie M, Tomidokoro A, et al. Prevalence and causes of low vision and blindness in a Japanese
adult population: the Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1354-62.
11. Wu L, Sun X, Zhou X, Weng C. Causes and 3-year-incidence of blindness in Jing-An District, Shanghai,
people will be myopic, one billion (10%) highly myopic.
China 2001-2009. BMC ophthalmology 2011;11:10.
12. Verhoeven VJ, Wong KT, Buitendijk GH, Hofman A, Vingerling JR, Klaver CC. Visual consequences of
refractive errors in the general population. Ophthalmology 2015;122:101-9.
13. Buch H, Vinding T, La Cour M, Appleyard M, Jensen GB, Nielsen NV. Prevalence and causes of visual
• Increasing myopia is associated with increased risk
of sight threatening complications such as myopic
impairment and blindness among 9980 Scandinavian adults: the Copenhagen City Eye Study. Ophthalmology
2004;111:53-61.
14. Flitcroft DI. The complex interactions of retinal, optical and environmental factors in myopia aetiology.
Progress in retinal and eye research 2012;31:622-60. macular degeneration, glaucoma and cataracts.
15. Holden BA, Jong M, Davis S, Wilson D, Fricke T, Resnikoff S. Nearly 1 billion myopes at risk of myopia-
related sight-threatening conditions by 2050 - time to act now. Clinical & experimental optometry :
journal of the Australian Optometrical Association 2015;98:491-3.
16. Morgan IG, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM. Myopia. Lancet 2012;379:1739-48.
17. Lim LT, Gong Y, Ah-Kee EY, Xiao G, Zhang X, Yu S. Impact of parental history of myopia on the development
• There is evidence that optical and environmental
of myopia in mainland china school-aged children. Ophthalmology and eye diseases 2014;6:31-5.
18. Jones LA, Sinnott LT, Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Moeschberger ML, Zadnik K. Parental history of myopia, sports
interventions can slow the progress of myopia and
reduce the burden of myopia.
and outdoor activities, and future myopia. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 2007;48:3524-32.
19. Si JK, Tang K, Bi HS, Guo DD, Guo JG, Wang XR. Orthokeratology for Myopia Control: A Meta-analysis.
Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry 2015;92:252-7.
20. Huang J, Wen D, Wang Q, et al. Efficacy Comparison of 16 Interventions for Myopia Control in Children:
A Network Meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2016;123:697-708.
21. Cheng D, Woo GC, Drobe B, Schmid KL. Effect of bifocal and prismatic bifocal spectacles on myopia
progression in children: three-year results of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA ophthalmology 2014;132:258-64.
22. Wu PC, Tsai CL, Wu HL, Yang YH, Kuo HK. Outdoor activity during class recess reduces myopia onset and
progression in school children. Ophthalmology 2013;120:1080-5.
23. He M, Xiang F, Zeng Y, et al. Effect of Time Spent Outdoors at School on the Development of Myopia Among
Children in China: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association
2015;314:1142-8.
24. Chia A, Lu QS, Tan D. Five-Year Clinical Trial on Atropine for the Treatment of Myopia 2: Myopia Control
with Atropine 0.01% Eyedrops. Ophthalmology 2015.
A
s our world grows and develops, our vision is getting
worse. That’s the takeaway from an important body
of research data about the world’s vision, with a
laser focus on myopia and its impact.
KEYWORDS
Myopia, myopic, blindness, vision impairment, eye disease,
digital eye strain, digital screen(s), public health, Asia
He said that 1 in 10 people worldwide will be at risk for A comparative study of six- and seven-year-old students of
permanent blindness by the year 2050, as high myopia Chinese ethnicity in Singapore and Sydney had interesting
especially increases the risk of cataracts, glaucoma, results when it explored the prevalence of myopia among
retinal detachment and myopic macular degeneration – all the focus population and possible risk factor.4 The major
of which can cause irreversible vision loss. finding was that myopia was more prevalent in Singapore
Research shows similar results in the United States. One The Holden study points to the under-40 age group,
study compared myopia rates from 1971-72 to the period especially in Asia, as being extremely susceptible to
of 1999-2004, with the later period showing substantially myopia because of reliance on smartphones, personal
higher myopia rates than 30 years earlier.6 computers and related technology for communications,
entertainment, news and education.1
Some regions and ethnicities report very low rates of
myopia, such as among Australian Aborigines and Solomon The competitive education systems in Singapore, Korea,
Islanders, where occurrence was in the 2-5 percent range. Taiwan and China are another factor, according to the
And a comparative study of urbanites in the United States study, causing students to spend more time studying at
computers. The comparative study of young students in impairment in 2007 at an estimated cost of more than
Sydney and Singapore also referred to this, noting the $269 billion per year.8
competitive academic environment of the island city-
state.4 Research from 2006 showed that more than 3.6 million
Americans suffered from visual impairment, blindness or
Socio-economic impact of myopia other eye diseases in 2004 – creating a financial burden
totaling $35.4 billion. And $8 billion of that total was loss
While the direct socio-economic impact of myopia has not of productivity. The annual impact to the U.S. government
been determined yet, the effect of poor vision on the budget was $13.7 billion.9
global economy is well documented. This myopia epidemic
creates a significant public health problem around the The National Medical Research Council of Singapore
world. The economic burden of uncorrected refractive commissioned a study of the economic cost of myopia. In
error (URE), largely caused by myopia, is estimated to be 2009, the mean annual direct cost of myopia for school-
more than $269 billion per year8, and that number will aged children in Singapore was $148 (U.S. dollars)
grow as the epidemic spreads. It is affecting developing annually, with the median cost at $125 (U.S. dollars) per
nations as well as the developed world. Actually, the Brien student.10
Holden study mentions that developed nations are seeing
a faster rise in myopia because of increased urbanization Public health consequences
and development, which usually means more digital
device use and higher education levels. This spreading myopia scourge will have a long-term
impact on public health and productivity around the world
The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that URE in the decades ahead. While the number of myopia cases
for distance is the main cause of low vision and the second may be rising faster in developed nations, the impact
leading cause of blindness after cataracts. WHO estimates could be greater in less-developed countries, where
point to URE as a bigger cause of productivity loss globally corrected vision could be the key to getting an education
than any other preventable vision disorders, with 0.8-4.0 for a child or an escape from poverty for an adult.
percent of the world’s population affected by visual
REFERENCES
1. Holden B, Fricke T, Wilson D, et al. Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from
2000 through 2050; Ophthalmology, 2016.
2. Pan CW, Dirani M, Cheng CY, Wong TY, Saw SM. The age-specific prevalence of myopia in Asia: a meta-
analysis. Optometry and Vision Science: official publication of the American Academy of Optometry 2015;
92:258-66.
3. Dolgin E. The myopia boom. Nature March 2015;519:276-8. KEY TAKEAWAYS
4. Rose K, Morgan I, Smith W, Burlutsky G, Mitchell P, Saw SM, Myopia, Lifestyle and Schooling in Students of
Chinese Ethnicity in Singapore and Sydney. JAMA Ophthalmology, April 1, 2008.
5. Dayan YB, Levin A, Morad Y, Grotto I, Ben-David R, Goldberg A, Onn E, Avin I, Levi Y, Benyamini O, The
Changing Prevalence of Myopia in Young Adults: A 13-Year Series of Population-Based Prevalence Surveys.
IOVS (Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science), August 2005. • Myopia is projected to affect half of the world’s
6. Vitale S, Sperduto RD, Ferris III FL, Increased Prevalence of Myopia in the United States Between 1971-1972
and 1999-2004. JAMA Ophthalmology, Dec. 14, 2009. population by 2050.
7. Boren ZD, There Are Officially More Mobile Devices than People in the World. The Independent, Oct. 7, 2014.
8. Smith TST, Fricke KD, Holden BA, Fricke TD, Naidoo KS, Potential Lost Productivity Resulting from the Global
Burden of URE. Bulletin World Health Organization, 2009.
9. Rein DB, Zhang P, Wirth K, Lee PP, Hoerger TJ, McCall N, Klein R, Tielsch JM, Vijan S, Saaddine J, The
Economic Burden of Major Adult Visual Disorders in the United States. JAMA Ophthalmology, Dec. 1, 2006.
• Young people in Asia are especially susceptible
10. Lim MCC, Gazzard G, Sim EL, Tong L, Saw SM, Direct Costs of Myopia in Singapore. National Medical
Research Council, 2009.
to myopia.
11. He M, Xiang F, Zeng Y, Mei J, Chen Q, Zheng J, Smith W, Rose K, Morgan IG, Effect of Time Spent Outdoors
at School on the Development of Myopia in Children in China: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of the
American Medical Association, Sept. 15, 2015.
12. Eyes Overexposed: The Digital Device Dilemma, 2016 Digital Eye Strain Report. The Vision Council. • There are links between myopia and the increasing
use of digital devices, such as smartphones and
13. De Larrard B, The new range of Eyezen™ lenses: what are the benefits perceived by wearers during screen
use? Points de Vue, International Review of Ophthalmic Optics, N72, Autumn 2015.
personal computers.
Dr. Anna Yeo Chwee Hong joined Essilor R&D Asia in May 2013
Dr. Damien Paillé is a member of Essilor International’s optical
as a Senior Vision Scientist after teaching optometry for 23 years
at the Singapore Polytechnic. Her current research interest is adult research and development team, based in Paris, France. Damien
myopia, on which she has conducted research internally at CI&T holds a degree in optometry and practiced as an optician before
Asia and in collaboration with other teaching institutions such as completing and defending a doctoral thesis in 2005 in cognitive
Zhongshan University and Singapore and Ngee Ann Polytechnics. sciences at the University of Paris VIII in collaboration with the College
She is also a member of the Scientific Committee in Wenzhou-Essilor de France and the Renault company. He then pursued post-doctoral
International Research Centre (WEIRC) for which she helps to review studies at the Laboratory for Perception and Motion Control in Virtual
research protocols and scientific publication. Dr. Anna Yeo has been Environments (a joint Renault-CNRS laboratory), before joining Essilor
a member of the Optometry and Opticianry Board (OOB) in Singapore International’s research and development team in 2007. He currently
and the Chairperson for the Credentials Committee, OOB since 2008.
works in the Vision Sciences department.
Born and raised in Singapore, Patricia is an Optometrist with a Dr. Björn Drobe obtained a B.Sc. in Optometry, a M.Sc. in Cognitive
background in Biomedical Science and a Master’s in Public Health. Sciences and a Ph.D. in Vision Sciences in Paris, France. He joined
She joined Essilor R&D Singapore in 2005, focusing on progressive the French Essilor Int. research team in 1998, working mainly on the
myopia in children and ethnic differences such as postural behavior. interaction between ophthalmic lenses and the human visual system,
In 2014, Patricia moved to Essilor Mission Division as Technical as well as on progressive myopia in children. From 2007 to 2013,
Manager to support the group’s social initiatives on training and Dr. Drobe relocated to Essilor R&D Singapore for a higher involvement
exploring base of the pyramid innovation. in myopia research. Since June 2013, he is the associate director of
WEIRC (Wenzhou Medical University – Essilor International Research
Center), managing an international research team on myopia in
children.
KEYWORDS
Myopia, myopia control, myopia correction, high myopia risks, hyperopic
defocus, accommodative lag, heredity, lifestyle, blue light, dopamine, atropine,
Ortho-K, orthokeratology, prismatic bifocal lenses, multifocal contact lenses,
progressive addition lenses, refractive surgery, outdoor light exposure, Myopilux
Although myopia may not have any eye health impact, Regarding lifestyle, near-vision-demanding tasks and
being highly myopic may have a great impact on ocular limited time spent outdoors are known to influence
health. It has been shown that a -8.00 D myope has 10 myopia development.
times more risk for the development of retinal pathologies
than a -4.00 D myope (Fig. 2).12,13 High myopia Intense near vision activities performed by children
has also been reported to be a risk factor for other have been associated with myopia development in
ocular pathologies, including glaucoma, choroidal neo- many studies.20-24 When looking at a near object, the
vascularization, and myopic macular degeneration.14 accommodative response of a myopic child is lower
Regarding cataract, there are divergent studies on its link than the proximity of the object, resulting in a slightly
with high myopia.15 Overall, high myopia is a leading defocused image (Fig. 3); light rays from near objects are
cause of visual impairment worldwide.16,17 focused behind the retina. This phenomenon is called the
accommodative lag. It has been found to be higher in
Therefore, it is of great importance to understand myopia myopes than in emmetropes.25-27
development and to find ways to slow the progression of
myopia during childhood. The accommodative lag increases with proximity (Fig. 4)
and creates a stimulus for the eye to elongate, leading to
1.4. Myopia, a multi-factorial refractive error myopia progression.26,28 The risk of developing myopia
Myopia development during childhood (onset and increases as the working distance is shorter and the
progression) is due to multiple factors, which are amount of near work is greater.
commonly split into two groups: heredity and lifestyle,
often referred to as nature and nurture. A large amount of near work combined with a lack of
outdoor activities are also highly associated with higher
Regarding heredity, it has been shown that children with myopia prevalence in children.29-31 It is still unclear how
two myopic parents are on average two to three times more outdoor activities impact myopia, and several hypotheses
likely to be myopic than children with non-myopic have been raised. Recent studies have suggested the
parents.18 More specifically, genetic studies have identified existence of interactions between light conditions and
numerous candidate genes and loci that may contribute to myopia development. As light intensities are much higher
myopia development.19 outdoors than indoors32, pupils are more constricted
outdoors. This would result in a greater depth of field and
less image blur, resulting in less myopia progression.31
80
Ref. 13
60
Accommodative
lag
Ref. 12
40
20 E
0
-10.00 -6.00 -2.00 0.00
-8.00 -4.00
FIG. 2 Risks of developing retinopathy as a function of myopia degree FIG. 3 The accommodative lag in near vision tasks
Figure 2: Risks
Myopia control
efficacy
Time spent
outdoors Peripheral addition lenses(4)
FIG. 5 Solutions for myopia management, classified according to their ability to correct myopia progression
Contact lenses have long been used to correct myopia. The lowest dosage (0.01%) showed a moderate myopia
However, the clinical efficacy of wearing standard soft slowing effect that was more sustained after cessation of
contact lenses in myopia control has not been the treatment. Unfortunately, this study did not include a
demonstrated.39 control group to be able to quantify the effects. Moreover,
in addition to its short-term side effects (photophobia due
As an alternative, refractive surgery, such as LASIK, offers to pupil dilatation, and reduced accommodation power),
a proven solution for correcting myopia in adulthood. atropine’s long-term side effects have not been
However, the method is invasive and does not control documented in children to date.
myopia or limit the risks of developing ocular pathologies
linked to high myopia. Indeed, refractive surgery modifies 2.3. Solutions that correct myopia and control myopia
the shape of the cornea at the front part of the eye, but it progression
does not change the axial length of the eyeball. Ophthalmic lenses with near vision addition have been
shown to be efficient in both correcting and slowing
2.2. Solutions that control myopia progression myopia progression and will be detailed in part 3. These
but do not correct it lenses have dedicated additional optical power in the
The least invasive method for myopia control is near vision zone that compensates for accommodative lag
undoubtedly to increase the time spent outdoors. A meta- in the myopic eye while the upper part of the lens allows
analysis performed on the association between time spent full myopia correction for far vision (Fig. 6). These lenses
outdoors and the risk of developing myopia in children has can either be prismatic bifocal lenses or progressive
indicated that spending one hour outdoors per week during addition lenses with an addition value and a design
childhood reduces the risk of developing myopia by 2%: adapted to children’s physiology. As of today, an addition
in other words, a child spending 10 hours more per week value of 2.00 D has been shown to be the most efficient
outdoors than another child has 20% less chance to compared to lower addition values for myopia control,43
become a myope later on.40 with up to 62% reduction in myopia evolution for
prismatic bifocal lenses.44
Atropine eye drops are also used in some countries in
clinical practice to slow down myopia progression. Initially Other ophthalmic lens designs, such as peripheral
it had been suggested that paralyzing accommodation addition lenses, have also been studied. The elongated
would result in less myopization, but later studies showed shape of myopic eyes results in a defocused image in the
alternative mechanisms and sites of action for atropine at periphery even with a perfect central focus (Fig. 7).45
either the retina or the sclera.41 Atropine has thus been It has been shown that this can cause elongation of the
studied in several clinical trials. One of them compared eyeball.46 Peripheral addition lenses are thus intended to
several dosages of atropine.42 The high dosages (above compensate for the peripheral hyperopic defocus and
0.1%) were efficient during treatment but were associated include two visual zones: the central zone of the lens
with a myopic rebound after the cessation of treatment. allows full myopia correction and the peripheral zone of
E
Near vision addition
For esophoric profiles, near vision addition lenses will be The lens is adapted to children’s posture; its inset is
comfortable because the exophoric shift induced by the higher and its progression length is shorter than those
addition will partially compensate for their natural for adults. This is to fit to children’s closer working
esophoria. distance and preferred usage of head over eye declination
(Fig. 11).
However, for exophoric profiles, near vision addition lenses
lead to discomfort as they add exophoric shift and require Myopilux® Plus:
a higher fusional vergence demand. Nonetheless, it has Myopilux® Plus lenses should be chosen by parents
been shown that near base-in prisms can reduce the looking for an advanced solution for their esophoric
exophoria induced by near vision addition lenses. More children with progressive myopia. In addition to Myopilux®
precisely, a 3D base-in prism combined with a +2.00 D Lite lenses, it is tailored to each child’s specific visual
near addition on each lens brings visual comfort to the ergonomics and benefits from Wave Technology point-
child, with a phoria at its initial state.58 It results in an by-point calculation. It ensures tailored lateral positioning
efficient usage of these near vision addition eyeglasses. of the whole visual zones for enhanced visual comfort
and it provides the child with better visual resolution (Fig.
3.2. An innovative range of ophthalmic lenses 10).
Based on the above long-term exploration, as well as on
sophisticated lens surface calculation methods, high Myopilux® Max:
performance production means and efficient methods for Myopilux® Max lenses are highly recommended for
controlling lens manufacturing processes, the Myopilux® children whose myopia progression is more than -1.00 D
range of lenses is protected by six Essilor patents and is per year. Its design includes a prismatic bifocal made of
available in three product versions: Myopilux® Lite, two wide and aberration-free optical zones separated by a
Myopilux® Plus, and Myopilux® Max. segment line (Fig. 10):
- The upper part of the lens offers the visual correction
Myopilux® Lite: adapted to the prescription.
Myopilux® Lite lenses are recommended for esophoric - The lower part is dedicated to near vision with an
children with progressive myopia. Its design includes addition of +2.00 D and 3D base-in prism.
a progressive optical design, with a recommended - The wide visual zones as well as the short segment
addition of +2.00 D for better efficacy in myopia control height have been designed specifically for children.
(Fig. 10).
FIG. 10 N
ear vision zone for Myopilux® Lite (left), Myopilux® Plus (center) and
FIG. 9 Near phoria. Myopilux® Max (right)
Figure 10: Myopilux Lite, Plus & Max
Adult Shorter
-2.00 Standard Single Vision
working
distance
Child Higher head vs. eye
declination -1.50
Higher inset
-1.00
Shorter
progression
length -0.50
Prismatic Bifocal
0.00
Baseline 6 12 18 24 30 36
FIG. 11 Child posture Duration (months)
FIG. 12 M
yopia progression of children wearing bifocal prismatic addition lenses
vs. single vision lenses over three years.
Conclusion
Based on the current scientific state of the art and the
scope of clinician’s practice, a number of options for
myopia correction and myopia control are worthy of
KEY TAKEAWAYS
consideration. As far as non-invasive solutions are
concerned, ophthalmic lenses such as Myopilux®* can be • Myopia is a progressive phenomenon in which onset
prescribed for effective myopia correction and control.
In terms of protocol, the ideal recommendation would be: and strongest progression are mainly reported during
1/ Practice eye examinations at least annually childhood.
2/ Update child corrections when needed • Myopia development during childhood (onset and
3/ In case of ophthalmic lens prescription, choose near
vision addition lenses with a design adapted to children progression) is due to multiple factors, which are
needs (see chapter 3.2 for Myopilux® designs) commonly split into two groups: heredity and lifestyle,
4/ Encourage outdoor activities. • often referred to as nature and nurture.
• Regarding heredity, it has been shown that children
with two myopic parents are on average two to three
*Myopilux®: a non-invasive range of near vision addition times more likely to be myopic than children with non-
ophthalmic lenses designed by Essilor for both myopia
correction and myopia control. The availability of Myopilux myopic parents.
lenses can vary depending on country and should be • Regarding lifestyle, near-vision-demanding tasks
checked locally by contacting an Essilor representative. and limited time spent outdoors are known to influence
myo-pia development.
• There are currently several options available to
manage myopia and they can be classified according
to their ability to correct and slow myopia progression
during childhood:
- Solutions that correct myopia but do not control
its progression are: single vision ophthalmic lenses,
regular contact lenses, refractive surgery
- Solutions that control myopia progression but
do not correct it are: time spent outdoors, atropine
eye drops
- Solutions that correct myopia and control myopia
progression are: ophthalmic lenses with near vision
addition (such as Myopilux® offer), various
multifocal contact lenses and Orthokeratology
(Ortho-K).
• Myopilux® is an all-in-one non-invasive range of
near vision addition ophthalmic lenses (prismatic
bifocal and progressive designs) for both myopia
correction and myopia control throughout childhood,
• Resulting from more than 10 years of exploratory
research by Essilor International myopia experts,
Myopilux® lenses are based on a deep understanding
of myopic children’s natural posture and physiology
to ensure good ergonomics and comfortable vision.
3 You QS, Wu LJ, Duan JL, Luo YX, Liu LJ, Li X, Gao Q, Wang W, Xu L, Jonas JB, Guo XH. Prevalence 37 Goss DA. Overcorrection as a means of slowing myopic progression. A.Am J Optom Physiol Opt.
of myopia in school children in greater Beijing: the Beijing Childhood Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014 1984 Feb;61(2):85-93.
Aug;92(5):e398-406. 38 Kushner BJ. Does overcorrecting minus lens therapy for intermittent exotropia cause myopia?
4 Li Z, Xu K, Wu S, Lv J, Jin D, Song Z, Wang Z, Liu P. Population-based survey of refractive error among Arch Ophthalmol. 1999 May;117(5):638-42.
school-aged children in rural northern China: the Heilongjiang eye study. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 39 Walline JJ, Jones LA, Sinnott L, Manny RE, Gaume A, Rah MJ, Chitkara M, Lyons S; ACHIEVE Study Group.
2014 May-Jun;42(4):379-84. A randomized trial of the effect of soft contact lenses on myopia progression in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis
5 Murthy GV, Gupta SK, Ellwein LB, Muñoz SR, Pokharel GP, Sanga L, Bachani D. Refractive error in children Sci. 2008 Nov;49(11):4702-6.
in an urban population in New Delhi. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 Mar;43(3):623-31. 40 Sherwin JC, Reacher MH, Keogh RH, Khawaja AP, Mackey DA, Foster PJ. The association between time
6 Vitale S, Sperduto RD, Ferris FL 3rd. Increased prevalence of myopia in the United States between spent outdoors and myopia in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology.
1971-1972 and 1999-2004. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Dec;127(12):1632-9. 2012 Oct;119(10):2141-51.
7 Williams KM, Bertelsen G, Cumberland P, et al.; European Eye Epidemiology (E3) Consortium. Increasing 41 McBrien NA, Moghaddam HO, Reeder AP. Atropine reduces experimental myopia and eye enlargement
Prevalence of Myopia in Europe and the Impact of Education. Ophthalmology. 2015 Jul;122(7):1489-97. via a nonaccommodative mechanism. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:205–15.
8 Goss DA, Rainey BB. Relation of childhood myopia progression rates to time of year. J Am Optom Assoc. 42 Chia A, Chua WH, Wen L, Fong A, Goon YY, Tan D. Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia:
1998 Apr;69(4):262-6. changes after stopping atropine 0.01%, 0.1% and 0.5%. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb;157(2):451-457.
9 Donovan L, Sankaridurg P, Ho A, Naduvilath T, Smith EL 3rd, Holden BA. Myopia progression rates in urban 43 Leung JT, Brown B. Progression of myopia in Hong Kong Chinese schoolchildren is slowed by wearing
children wearing single-vision spectacles. Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Jan;89(1):27-32 progressive lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 1999 Jun;76(6):346-54.
10 Lin LL, Shih YF, Hsiao CK, Chen CJ. Prevalence of myopia in Taiwanese schoolchildren: 1983 to 2000. 44 Cheng D, Schmid KL, Woo GC, Drobe B. Randomized trial of effect of bifocal and prismatic bifocal
Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2004 Jan;33(1):27-33. spectacles on myopic progression: two-year results. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Jan;128(1):12-9.
11 Koh V, Yang A, Saw SM, Chan YH, Lin ST, Tan MM, Tey F, Nah G, Ikram MK. Differences in prevalence of 45 Mutti DO, Sholtz RI, Friedman NE, Zadnik K. Peripheral refraction and ocular shape in children.
refractive errors in young Asian males in Singapore between 1996-1997 and 2009-2010. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Apr;41(5):1022-30.
2014 Aug;21(4):247-55. 46 Smith EL 3rd, Hung LF, Huang J. Relative peripheral hyperopic defocus alters central refractive development
12 Vongphanit J, Mitchell P, Wang JJ. Prevalence and progression of myopic retinopathy in an older population. in infant monkeys. Vision Res. 2009 Sep;49(19):2386-92
Ophthalmology. 2002 Apr;109(4):704-11. 47 Sankaridurg P, Donovan L, Varnas S, Ho A, Chen X, Martinez A, Fisher S, Lin Z, Smith EL 3rd, Ge J,
13 Liu HH, Xu L, Wang YX, Wang S, You QS, Jonas JB. Prevalence and progression of myopic retinopathy Holden B. Spectacle lenses designed to reduce progression of myopia: 12-month results.Optom Vis Sci. 2010
in Chinese adults: the Beijing Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2010 Sep;117(9):1763-8. Sep;87(9):631-41.
14 Morgan IG1, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM. Myopia. Lancet. 2012 May 5;379(9827):1739-48. 48 Hasebe S, Jun J, Varnas SR. Myopia control with positively aspherized progressive addition lenses: a 2-year,
multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Sep 30;55(11):7177-88.
15 Pan CW1, Cheng CY, Saw SM, Wang JJ, Wong TY. Myopia and age-related cataract: a systematic review
and meta-analysis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov;156(5):1021-1033. 49 Sankaridurg P, Holden B, Smith E 3rd, Naduvilath T, Chen X, de la Jara PL, Martinez A, Kwan J, Ho A,
Frick K, Ge J. Decrease in rate of myopia progression with a contact lens designed to reduce relative peripheral
16 Iwase A, Araie M, Tomidokoro A, Yamamoto T, Shimizu H, Kitazawa Y; Tajimi Study Group. Prevalence hyperopia: one-year results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Dec 9;52(13):9362-7.
and causes of low vision & blindness in a Japanese adult population: the Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology.
2006 Aug;113(8):1354-62. 50 Anstice NS, Phillips JR. Effect of dual-focus soft contact lens wear on axial myopia progression in children.
Ophthalmology. 2011 Jun;118(6):1152-61.
17 Wu L, Sun X, Zhou X, Weng C. Causes and 3-year-incidence of blindness in Jing-An District, Shanghai,
China 2001-2009. BMC Ophthalmol. 2011 May 5;11:10. 51 Si JK, Tang K, Bi HS, Guo DD, Guo JG, Wang XR. Orthokeratology for myopia control: a meta-analysis.
Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Mar;92(3):252-7.
18 Zhang X, Qu X, Zhou X. Association between parental myopia and the risk of myopia in a child.
Exp Ther Med. 2015 Jun;9(6):2420-2428. 52 Sun Y, Xu F, Zhang T, Liu M, Wang D, Chen Y, Liu Q. Correction: Orthokeratology to Control Myopia
Progression: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 11;10(6):e0130646.
19 Simpson CL, Wojciechowski R, Oexle K, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis of myopia and hyperopia provides
evidence for replication of 11 loci. PLoS One. 2014 Sep 18;9(9):e107110. 53 Wen D, Huang J, Chen H, Bao F, Savini G, Calossi A, Chen H, Li X, Wang Q. Efficacy and Acceptability of
Orthokeratology for Slowing Myopic Progression in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of
20 Saw SM, Wu HM, Seet B, Wong TY, Yap E, Chia KS, Stone RA, Lee L. Academic achievement, close Ophthalmology, vol. 2015, Article ID 360806, 12 pages, 2015.
up work parameters, and myopia in Singapore military conscripts. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Jul;85(7):855-60.
54 Drobe B, Seow EJ, Bao J, Wang Y, Lu F, Near vision posture in myopic Chinese children. ARVO Poster, 2011.
21 Saw SM, Hong RZ, Zhang MZ, Fu ZF, Ye M, Tan D, Chew SJ. Near-work activity and myopia in rural and
urban schoolchildren in China. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2001 May-Jun;38(3):149-55. 55 Seow EJ, Drobe B, Tang FL, Influence of Language and Task on Working Distance in Singaporean Chinese
Bilinguals. ARVO Poster, 2007.
22 Vera-Díaz FA, Strang NC, Winn B. Nearwork induced transient myopia during myopia progression.
Curr Eye Res. 2002 Apr;24(4):289-95. 56 Millodot M, 2009, Dictionary of Optometry and Visual Science, 7th edition, Butterworth-Heinemann.
23 Yi JH, Li RR. Influence of near-work and outdoor activities on myopia progression in school children. 57 Jiang BC, Tea YC, O’Donnell D. Changes in accommodative and vergence responses when viewing through
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Jan;13(1):32-5. Chinese. near addition lenses. Optometry. 2007 Mar;78(3):129-34.
24 Saw SM, Chua WH, Hong CY, Wu HM, Chan WY, Chia KS, Stone RA, Tan D. Nearwork in early-onset myopia. 58 Cheng D, Schmid KL, Woo GC. The effect of positive-lens addition and base-in prism on accommodation
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 Feb;43(2):332-9. accuracy and near horizontal phoria in Chinese myopic children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008 May;28(3):225-
37.
25 Abbott ML, Schmid KL, Strang NC. Differences in the accommodation stimulus response curves of adult
myopes and emmetropes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1998 Jan;18(1):13-20. 59 Gwiazda JE, Hyman L, Hussein M, Everett D, Norton TT, Kurtz D, Leske MC, Manny R, Marsh-Tootle W,
Scheiman M. A randomized clinical trial of progressive addition lenses versus single vision lenses on the
26 Gwiazda JE, Thorn F, Bauer J, Held R. Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur. progression of myopia in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Apr;44(4):1492-500.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993 Mar;34(3):690-4.
60 Gwiazda JE, Hyman L, Norton TT, et al.; COMET Group. Accommodation and related risk factors associated
27 Yeo AC, Kang KK, Tang W. Accommodative stimulus response curve of emmetropes and myopes. with myopia progression and their interaction with treatment in COMET children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.
Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2006 Dec;35(12):868-74. 2004 Jul;45(7):2143-51.
28 Harb E, Thorn F, Troilo D. Characteristics of accommodative behavior during sustained reading 61 Cheng D, Woo GC, Drobe B, Schmid KL. Effect of bifocal and prismatic bifocal spectacles on myopia
in emmetropes and myopes. Vision Res. 2006 Aug;46(16):2581-92. progression in children: three-year results of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014
29 Lu B, Congdon N, Liu X, Choi K, Lam DS, Zhang M, Zheng M, Zhou Z, Li L, Liu X, Sharma A, Song Y. Mar;132(3):258-64.
Associations between near work, outdoor activity, and myopia among adolescent students in rural China: the
Xichang Pediatric Refractive Error Study report no. 2. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Jun;127(6):769-75.
30 Hepsen IF, Evereklioglu C, Bayramlar H. The effect of reading and near-work on the development of myopia in
emmetropic boys: a prospective, controlled, three-year follow-up study. Vision Res. 2001 Sep;41(19):2511-20.
31 Rose KA, Morgan IG, Ip J, Kifley A, Huynh S, Smith W, Mitchell P. Outdoor activity reduces the prevalence
of myopia in children. Ophthalmology. 2008 Aug;115(8):1279-85.
32 Dharani R, Lee CF, Theng ZX, Drury VB, Ngo C, Sandar M, Wong TY, Finkelstein EA, Saw SM. Comparison
of measurements of time outdoors and light levels as risk factors for myopia in young Singapore children.
Eye (Lond). 2012 Jul;26(7):911-8.
33 McCarthy CS, Megaw P, Devadas M, Morgan IG. Dopaminergic agents affect the ability of brief periods
of normal vision to prevent formdeprivation myopia. Exp Eye Res. 2007 Jan;84(1):100-7.
RECORD-HIGH MYOPIA
S O LV E D B Y A N A L L I A N C E
OF EXPERTS: -108.00 D
A
n exceptional prescription for out-of-the-ordinary
Sebastian Chrien needs: RE: -106.00 (+6.00) 0°; LE: -108.00
Optometrist, Banská Bystrica, (+6.00) 25°. Collaboration between Franco-Slovak
Slovakia experts enabled the need evaluation, design, manufacture
and fitting of -108 diopter lenses to correct what is
probably the world’s highest degree of myopia. This
record, set in February 2016, topped the previous
achievement of -104 diopters set by the same team in
Alain Massée
January 2015. The story goes back nearly two years ago,
Head of Special lens surfacing
when a veritable chain of vision expertise was set up
projects, Essilor SL Lab (Special
between professionals in Slovakia and France with the
Lenses Laboratory), France
aim of pooling skills to push back the boundaries of what
is possible in optometry and optics. The team has already
proved their skill twice, and their work is intimately linked
Léonel Pereira to the unique case of Jan Miskovic, a 59-year-old Slovak
Workshop Manager, Surfacing who has suffered since childhood with severe myopia,
and Special Lenses, Essilor amblyopia in two eyes, astigmatism, strabismus and
SL Lab (Special Lenses keratoconus. This combination of conditions made
Laboratory), France treatment highly complex, particularly since his myopia is
still progressing, with an average loss in recent years of 4
to 5 diopters per year.
KEYWORDS
High myopia, keratoconus, amblyopia, astigmatism, strabismus, Essilor Mr
Blue edger, special lenses, biconcave double facet lens, World Sight Day,
Special lenses Laboratory (SL Lab), Essilor.
However, these requirements are not easy to evaluate. His contact with Essilor’s SL Lab (Special Lenses Laboratory)
correction went from -45 diopters in 2001 to -53 diopters in France, which draws on Essilor’s latest technological
in 2008 and -80 diopters in 2012, which at the time advances to provide solutions for patients suffering from
required the bonding of two lenses together, one on top of severe ametropia (refractive error),” explains Monika
the other, via polymerization. At the time, the limits of Remiasova, marketing specialist of the Group’s Slovak
technology seemed to have been reached, but the patient’s subsidiary. Remiasova contacted Benoit Herpeux, her
vision nevertheless continued to deteriorate creating new dedicated customer service representative at SL Lab, who
challenges for the eye care professionals. “We are beyond in turn forwarded the request to Alain Massée, head of
standards in optics and optometry; therefore we inevitably special lens projects at SL Lab. This new demand
choose non-standard means of measurement,” explains represented no small challenge for this first collaboration:
Sebastian Chrien, optometrist in Banská Bystrica in -104 D sphere, 6.00 D cylinder (and -103 D for the right
Slovakia, who is currently taking care of Jan Miskovic. eye)! Even so, the response was not long coming back. “I
“There are no instruments capable of measuring his sent an e-mail on 9 October in the morning and received
myopia level, so we place trial lenses in front of his glasses an enthusiastic “yes” the same day. In the meantime, the
and ask for his subjective reaction to estimate the required SL team had to adapt its calculation software to three-
correction as closely as possible. Nevertheless, we are digit figure correction (it only went up to -99 diopters),
guided by a single golden rule; the subjective improvement check that it had the right glass raw materials and begin
of any aspect of his sight,” pursues Mr Chrien. They met to think about the design of new surfacing tools,” explains
each other thanks to photography five years ago. Mr Chrien Remiasova.
is convinced that photography and optometry combined
together, can help in greater understanding of visual needs
and explain the ability of functional seeing despite such a
considerable visual impairment: “As a professional
photographer, Jan Miskovic is perfectly able to perceive
little nuances and changes. This definitively helps in The SL Lab, an expert in exceptional requirements
subjective optometric evaluation. He is knowledgeable In fact, the Slovak request fostered a spirit of competition
about image and its different forms. He understands the in the workshop of Essilor’s French laboratory at Les
mechanism of optical aperture, which may help him in Battants, in Ligny-en-Barrois, which made it possible to
enhancing depth of field. When he works, he can find a set a first record (of -104 diopters) in 2015. The new
compromise between visual aspects such as sharpness, target in 2016 was clear: meet the various technical and
contrast, luminosity, and movement. His photographic industrial challenges to reach -108 diopters with 6.00
perception of the world enables him to analyse elements diopters cylinder to prove that the Group can provide
such as perspective, while differentiating subjects with customized solutions for all eyeglass wearers, with no
unequal size and clarity and thus estimating distances. exceptions. “The lens design stage was the most
Usually, we do not perceive all of that; we unconsciously complex,” reveals Léonel Pereira, Workshop Manager,
take all elements for granted, so we do not even notice Surfacing and Special Lenses, SL LAB. “A lens of this
them. Jan’s vision is different. It is as if he was trained to power has to be biconcave. The main constraint concerns
watch with his mind,” Mr Chrien concludes. the rear surface and its short radius, which supports most
of the power in its spherical curve. A toric surface was
The Essilor network in action created on the front side, with a substantial but less
In 2014, Jan Miskovic participated in an event organized pronounced curve.” These specifics spurred the team to
by Essilor Slovakia for World Sight Day and the new optical opt for a high-index (1.807) mineral material, a biconcave
solution presented itself almost by chance. He questioned Superdiafal (=antireflective coating) with an asymmetrical
Essilor’s team there about the possibility of making special facet, which provides optimal optical performance for
lenses for high prescriptions, and his outlook immediately this correction level. The design calculations were made
brightened. “Of course, we had never before received a possible using the Special Lens Calculator (SLC),
request like this. But at the time we were starting to specifically developed to meet the requirements of special
develop our special lenses offer so we made preliminary lenses.
The inner surface (eye side) of the lens was designed with
a power of -77 diopters and an optical aperture 18 mm in
diameter, combined with a base curve of +2.50 diopters,
unpolished to absorb unwanted reflection. The remainder
of the correction was produced on the external surface by
a -31 diopter curve (to obtain the total power of -108 D)
with a cylinder correction of 6.00 diopters, associated
again here with a base curve of +6.00 diopters and an
inverted torus to create a perfectly round optical aperture
of 24 mm diameter. “This optical aperture gives the
wearer a field of view of about +/- 30°, which is satisfactory
given the power of the lens. The curvature of the front
facet was selected to make a thinner lens possible, but
also to facilitate the mounting of the lens at an ideal eye-
lens distance,” Pereira concludes.
FIG. 1 L
ens -108.00 (+6.00) 25 produced in Essilor SL Lab (Special Lens
Laboratory), France Creative know-how in lens manufacturing
and quality assurance
The manufacturing expertise called upon to produce
Miskovic’s lenses can be seen primarily in the creation of
the inner surface. A manual ramp-up process was used
with a tool specially designed by the SL Lab team to
rough out, smooth and polish a radius of about 10 mm,
using very precise manual technical moves. This initial
optical surface was then measured by reflection with a
radiuscope to one-hundredth of a millimeter, and this
radius measure was used to calculate the base curve of
the outer surface. “This stage is highly sensitive, since
achieving a toric surface over a very short distance
requires a high level of expertise and perfect technical
mastery. The process is adapted for pressure, cycle speed,
tooling. Each curve achieved is measured with the
radiuscope, which is how we obtain such a high degree of
FIG. 2 L
ens ready for optical quality control with a radiuscope in Essilor SL Lab
precision,” comments Pereira.
(Special Lens Laboratory), France
Once the lenses were finalized, they then had to go
through quality assurance to verify that power deviation
from precision is less than 2%. Since no frontofocometer
is capable of measuring such a high level of optical power,
a radiuscope was once again used to validate the radii of
the base curves of the inner and outer surfaces to enable
calculation of the total refractive power of the lens (taking
into account the material index) with less than 0.2%
margin of error. Verdict: the challenge was successfully
met! Moreover, the Slovak subsidiary was able to follow
each step in real time and in pictures. “We communicated
throughout the process, sending photos to enable our
Slovak colleagues to better understand the development
of these lenses. It was also a good way to forge closer ties
between the teams, which will have more and more
FIG. 3 Lens reception in Slovakia
opportunities to work together,” Massée concludes.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
A
t first contact, this jovial Slovak almost comes
across as a cartoon character or some kind of
prankster, with good reason: Jan Miskovic’s
impressive -108 diopter facet lenses transform his eyes
into intriguing black dots. After exchanging a few words
and anecdotes, though, it only takes a few minutes to
realize that appearances can be deceiving, and that, in
reality, his gaze is extremely sensitive and sharp. And
that’s exactly what you would expect from a passionate
professional photographer, who proves by example that the
practice of his art and impaired vision are perfectly
compatible thanks to modern technology.
Jan likes to immortalize memorable moments, so it’s not surprising that a large share of his collection
of portraits is devoted to music, singers and instruments. “I like to calmly listen to jazz, in good com-
pany, but I can’t resist picking up my camera from time to time.”
Of course, Jan has other strings to his photographic bow, participate in the Cesta světla (Way of Light), an annual
some of which are more intimate. Attracted to “faces with charitable event organized by the Slovak Union for the
character,” he admits to a special fondness for portraits Blind, which is set to celebrate its 13th event. “Both the
and boasts a fine collection of photographs of Slovak and sighted and visually impaired can participate in this big
international celebrities, nearly 900 of which are annual photo competition, which generates some
autographed. absolutely superb, highly original photos,” Jan explains,
pointing out that the event is followed by a travelling
Focusing on the future exhibition that he hopes, one day, will travel beyond
Slovakia’s borders.
He has collaborated with numerous national magazines
and has had exhibitions throughout the world, including in These are just a few examples, among many, of the
Lake Alfred (Florida), Monte Carlo, Budapest and philanthropic endeavours of a man in a day-to-day struggle
Bratislava. Recognition and a promising future in to improve his own condition via the practice of visual
photography are likely in the cards for this artist who, in yoga. “I spent six months mastering the technique, and I
any case, does not like to look back. “I have some have now been practicing these exercises for over three
wonderful memories, but I am not a fan of nostalgia. years to train my eyes and prevent excessive fatigue.
Living in the past and regretting ‘the golden age of The results are palpable, and I feel like my vision is
analogue photography,’ for instance, is counter-productive, deteriorating less rapidly than before. I would advise all
especially for someone like me who owes so much to visually impaired people to try these exercises.”
modern technology. And I’m not the only one who feels
this way! The new cameras and the array of possibilities With his big heart, enormous energy and overflowing
opened up by digital technology have made a huge enthusiasm, Jan Miskovic is a real phenomenon, which in
contribution to the development of sports photography,” his eyes is perfectly normal. He likes to recharge his
insists this inveterate Nikon fan, who works extensively batteries near the water, listen to jazz, and spend quality
with the D4S, an SLR perfect for motion photos, and who time with friends and family. He’s a man like any other,
has been greedily eyeing the brand-new D5. but also a consummate artist whose record of achievements
includes a singular summit: undoubtedly the world’s
Visions of hope highest degree of myopia! •
Always looking for the best possible angle of view, Jan took advantage of the abundant snow to dig a hole and
position himself at ground level. “It was only when I saw the photo on my computer that I realized the dogs were
literally flying above the snow!”
Hydroplane races are the only passion that Jan no longer indulges in since his accident.
“I miss the adrenaline, but I content myself with taking photos. I am especially attracted
to water and try to get as close to it as possible whenever I can.”
From a painful attack in Muay-Taï combat to a high jumper’s flop technique and the disturbing choreography of a rodeo,
Jan strives to capture movement, the essence of sports. “You need to look for an original angle, a unique point of view,
as close as possible to the action, but without disrupting it.”
Myopia in the year 2000 and beyond A perspective on the evolution and management
Dr Franck J. Weinstock of myopia
[Points de Vue 30 - spring 1994] Kovin S. Naidoo, Diane B. Wallace
[Points de Vue 63 - Autumn 2010]
Ethnic variations in myopia
Noel A. Brennan Lenses to slow the progression of myopia
[Points de Vue 30 - spring 1994] Elodie Camaret, Björn Drobe
[Points de Vue 63 - Autumn 2010]
The correction of myopia in sportsmen
and women using contact lenses Experience with correcting myopia with different types
Philippe David of contact lenses
[Points de Vue 30 - spring 1994] Edward S. Bennett
[Points de Vue 63 - Autumn 2010]
Famous myopes
Pierre Amalric Sclera reinforcement treatment and prevention
[Points de Vue 30 - spring 1994] of complications of progressive myopia in children
Elena P. Tarutta, Elena N. Iomdina, Elena V. Viadro
The advantages of high-index lenses [Points de Vue 63 - Autumn 2010]
in the correction of myopia
Roger Coulibaly Myopia surgery
[Points de Vue 30 - spring 1994] Jean-Jacques Saragoussi
[Points de Vue 63 - Autumn 2010]
Myopia in Asia : a growing problem
Carly Sy Lam, Maurice Yap The latest advances in controlling myopia :
[Points de Vue 50 - Spring 2004] a clinical perspective
Amanda Alvarez, Christine Wildsoet
Drug treatments for Control of myopia Progression [Points de Vue 64 - Spring 2011]
Options for Now and the Future
Christine Wildsoet Accommodation stability and the progression
[Points de Vue 51 - Autumn 2004] of myopia in children
Trine Langaas, Norway, Patricia Riddell, United Kingdom
Children’ s Myopia in China [Points de Vue 66 - Spring 2012]
Lu Fan, Bao Jinhua, Qu Jia
[Points de Vue 55 - Autumn 2006] Myopia in young adulthood
Katrina Schmid, Australia
Myopia: what makes the eye grow longer? [Points de Vue 66 - Spring 2012]
Frank Schaeffel
[Points de Vue 63 - Autumn 2010] Prevalence and risk factors of myopia among schoolchildren
in Chimi, Taiwan
Pathological and risk factors of myopia Pei-Chang Wu, Taïwan
in Chinese Population [Points de Vue 66 - Spring 2012]
Zhao Kanxing, Zhang Lin, Wang Yan
[Points de Vue 63 - Autumn 2010]
Dr. John Ang Maralen Busche Laura De Yñigo William Harris Andy Hepworth Pedro Janowitzer
President, The International Vision Head of Product Marketing, Varilux Institute Director, Project Manager, Global Key BSc (hons), FBDO, Head of Marketing Vice President,
Academy, Vice-President, Essilor Germany Essilor Spain Opinion Leaders and Professional Relations, Essilor Latin America
Education & Professional Services, Professional Relations, Essilor UK
ESSILOR AMERA Essilor International
Eva Lazuka-Nicoulaud Dominique Meslin Charles-Éric Poussin Dr. Howard B. Purcell Alain Riveline Annie Rodriguez
Head of Publication Points de Director of Professional Consumer Innovation Manager OD, FAAO, Senior Corporate Senior Vice Director of Vision Health
Vue, Global Key Opinion Relations and Technical Next Generation Consumers, Vice President, Customer President, Global Marketing, Essilor France
Leaders and Professional Affairs, Essilor Europe Essilor International Development Group, Essilor International
Relations, Essilor International Essilor of America
Dr. Rod Tahran Louise Tanguay Tim Thurn Roberto Tripodi Lily Peng Zhang
OD, FAAO, Vice President, Special Projects, Optical Director of Professional Professional Relations and Technical Standard Manager,
Professional Relations, Schools and Events Services, Essilor Australia Professional Affairs, Shanghai Essilor Optical Co.,
Essilor of America Professional Relations, and New Zealand Essilor Italy LTD
Essilor Canada
SCIENTIFIC BOARD
The Scientific Board is represented by international peer-recognized experts. The members of Scientific Board are not funded
by Essilor for their work or for any contribution they may make to Points de Vue. The Scientific Board’s role is to ensure both
the integrity and credibility of the magazine. In fulfilling this role, the Scientific Board is able to amend and reject articles.
Prof. Clifford Brooks, Prof. Julián García Sánchez, Dr. Daniel Malacara,
Indiana University School of Optometry, United States Medical Faculty UCM, Spain M.Sc, PhD Optical engineering, Optic Research Centre,
Mexico
Prof. Christian Corbé, Prof. Mo Jalie,
Invalides Institute, France Founder President of the University of Ulster, UK Prof. Yves Pouliquen,
Representative Association for low vision Initiatives Member of the Académie de Médecine
(ARIBa), FranceCourt Expert Farhad Hafezi, and of the Académie Française, France
Professor and Chief Medical Officer, Ophthalmology
Dr. Colin Fowler, Clinic, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Geneva Dr. Marcus Safady,
Director of Undergraduate Clinical, Studies Optometry University Hospitals, Switzerland Ophthalmologist, chairman of the Sociedade Brasileira
& Vision Sciences, Aston University, UK de Oftalmologia (S.B.O.), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Bernard Maitenaz,
Inventor of Varilux, Essilor France
International Review Design, layout Front cover illustration © Luminescence, France / Shutterstock
of Ophthalmic Optics Essilor International - William Harris
Any reproduction, in full or in part, of the articles included
Circulation: 15 000 copies in 40 Textuel La Mine in this magazine without the consent of the authors concerned
countries - English, French, German, 146, rue du Faubourg-Poissonnière – 75010 Paris – France is illegal (art. 40 para 1 of the French Law of March 11, 1957).
Spanish and Chinese Tel: (+33) 1 5321 2100
Myopilux® is a trademark of Essilor International.
ISSN 1290-9661 Printing
ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL - R.C CRETEIL B 712 049 618 ALTAVIA PARIS
147, rue de Paris – 94227 Charenton Cedex – France 10, rue Blanqui - 93406 Saint-Ouen Cedex - France
Tel: (+33) 1 4977 4224 - Fax: (+33) 1 4977 4485 Tel: +33 (0)1 49 48 00 00
www.pointsdevue.com
STAY UPDATED
SUBSCRIBE TO
W W W. POINTSDEVUE. CO M