Pyrolysis, Gasification and Mass Burn Incineration

A Comparison of Pyrolysis, Gasification and Mass Burn Incineration
There are several different processes for thermal degradation of waste materials, and each
has its own set of pros and cons. Incineration is one of the oldest and most widely used
methods for processing organic waste, but it has many drawbacks. A recent report from
the World Bank argues that incineration should no longer be considered a first-best
solution to managing municipal solid waste. Instead, the authors recommend that nations
move towards more sustainable waste management practices such as recycling,
composting, or bio-gas production from waste. However, there are situations where
incineration is still the most cost-effective option available. In this article we discuss in
detail the three main thermal degradation processes—Pyrolysis, Gasification and Mass
Burn Incineration—and their applicability to different types of organic waste streams.
Pyrolysis: What is it?
Pyrolysis is a thermochemical decomposition of organic materials (often biomass) by
treating them at high temperatures in the absence of oxygen. This process of controlled
thermal degradation converts the feedstock into a mix of gases, liquids and solids. In
other words, it is the decomposition of organic material by subjecting it to the heat source
with no additional oxygen. Pyrolysis is a chemical reaction in which carbon-containing
materials break down into smaller molecules. This is achieved by applying high
temperatures in the absence of oxygen (normally above 350 °C). Pyrolysis is a
convenient way to generate energy while reducing waste volume, cleaning the material
and extracting useful by-products. The main challenge of this technique is to control the
exothermic reactions so that the reactions proceed at a reasonable rate without self-
ignition or the formation of tar.
Gasification: What is it?

Gasification is a process in which organic material is decomposed at high temperatures in
the presence of steam and oxygen. Gasification technology can be used to convert
biomass (organic waste), coal, municipal solid waste and other materials into syngas
(carbon monoxide and hydrogen). The syngas can be used to generate electricity, heat or
be converted into other chemical compounds such as methanol or synthetic natural gas
(SNG). The advantage of this process is that it can be used to convert any type of organic
waste into syngas, whereas pyrolysis is more specific and only works well with a certain
subset of feedstock.
Mass Burn Incineration: What is it?

Mass burn incineration is the most traditional method of thermal waste treatment. It is a
closed system in which a large amount of waste is fed into a furnace at high temperatures
(800-1100 °C). The waste is burned and the heat is used to generate steam which is then
used to drive a turbine. The turbine produces electricity and the ash remains after burning
is collected and treated as residual waste. Mass burn incineration is a complex process
which requires high-temperature furnaces and special design to ensure that the process is
safe and efficient. It is particularly suited to the disposal of municipal solid waste, but can
also be used for other organic waste streams such as agriculture, forestry and industrial
residues.
Which Process to use?

Each of these three processes has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. Pyrolysis
works well with agricultural residues, but it has a low energy yield. Gasification is a very
versatile process that can handle a wide range of feedstock and produce syngas (which
can be used to produce electricity and heat). Mass burn incineration is best suited to
municipal solid waste and other high-temperature feedstocks. When choosing a method
of thermal waste treatment, it is important to consider issues such as the feedstock, the
availability of renewable energy sources, the composition of the end-product and the cost
of the process. It is almost impossible to choose the best process for all types of streams.
Rather, it is important to first identify the best process for your specific waste stream and
then find the most suitable plant for your application.
The Cons of Mass Burn Incineration
One of the biggest drawbacks of industrial-scale mass burn incinerators is the amount of
air pollution that they emit into the environment. The high temperatures inside the
incinerator generate toxic gasses such as dioxins and furans, heavy metals and carbon
monoxide. Mass burn incinerators also produce ash with low levels of heavy metals. This
ash is often contaminated with toxic elements such as lead and cadmium. Air pollution
control technologies are available that can greatly reduce the amount of pollution coming
out of a mass burn incinerator. Unfortunately, these technologies are costly and can add a
significant amount of money to the overall cost of the incinerator.
Why is Mass Burn Incineration so Controversial?

In most parts of the world, the amount of trash being generated is increasing. This has led
to a rise in the number of mass burn incinerators being built as a way to reduce the
amount of waste that needs to be hauled away. However, many people are concerned
about the amount of pollution that a large incinerator can generate. There have also been
concerns about the amount of harmful substances present in the ash left over from the
incinerator process. These concerns have led to the development of new technologies
designed to reduce the impact of mass burn incinerators. These technologies include the
use of low-pollution burners and advanced filters that can trap contaminants before they
enter the atmosphere.
Final Words: What’s the Bottom Line?

Mass burn incinerators are able to generate significant amounts of power. However, they
can only do this efficiently when the incinerator is running at maximum capacity. This
means that power companies will likely want to build new mass burn incinerators near
large cities. Ideally, they will want to be located near areas where large numbers of
people live and work. This will help maximize the amount of energy that they are able to
generate. However, there is a growing concern that some communities will fear the
impact of a new mass burn incinerator. These concerns are reflected in proposed
legislation in some parts of the world that would ban the construction of new mass burn
incinerators.
Summing up
Thermal degradation is the process by which organic waste is decomposed by applying
high temperatures. Pyrolysis, gasification and mass burn incineration are the most
common thermal processes. All three processes have their own advantages and
disadvantages. When choosing a method of thermal waste treatment, it is important to
consider issues such as the feedstock, the availability of renewable energy sources and
the composition of the end-product.

Pyrolysis, Gasification and Mass Burn Incineration

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pyrolysis, Gasification and Mass Burn Incineration

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pyrolysis, Gasification and Mass Burn Incineration

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

A Comparison of Pyrolysis, Gasification and Mass Burn Incineration

Gasification: What is it?

Mass Burn Incineration: What is it?

Which Process to use?

Why is Mass Burn Incineration so Controversial?

Final Words: What’s the Bottom Line?

You might also like