Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 28 views

    PSYC 364 Oral Presentation: Quality (/4)

    Uploaded by

    Kiki19
    The document appears to be a rubric for grading oral presentations. It evaluates presentations on quality of delivery, organization, content, and interpretation. For delivery, it considers articulation, volume, inflection, and eye contact. For organization, it considers preparation and structure. For content, it considers completeness and relevance of information. For interpretation, it considers linking the presentation to related materials. The rubric provides descriptors to guide scoring presentations as excellent, good, satisfactory, or poor in these areas.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    PSYC 364 Oral Presentation: Quality (/4)

    Uploaded by

    Kiki19
    28 views1 page
    The document appears to be a rubric for grading oral presentations. It evaluates presentations on quality of delivery, organization, content, and interpretation. For delivery, it considers articulation, volume, inflection, and eye contact. For organization, it considers preparation and structure. For content, it considers completeness and relevance of information. For interpretation, it considers linking the presentation to related materials. The rubric provides descriptors to guide scoring presentations as excellent, good, satisfactory, or poor in these areas.

    Original Title

    Untitled

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document appears to be a rubric for grading oral presentations. It evaluates presentations on quality of delivery, organization, content, and interpretation. For delivery, it considers articulation, volume, inflection, and eye contact. For organization, it considers preparation and structure. For content, it considers completeness and relevance of information. For interpretation, it considers linking the presentation to related materials. The rubric provides descriptors to guide scoring presentations as excellent, good, satisfactory, or poor in these areas.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    28 views1 page

    PSYC 364 Oral Presentation: Quality (/4)

    Uploaded by

    Kiki19
    The document appears to be a rubric for grading oral presentations. It evaluates presentations on quality of delivery, organization, content, and interpretation. For delivery, it considers articulation, volume, inflection, and eye contact. For organization, it considers preparation and structure. For content, it considers completeness and relevance of information. For interpretation, it considers linking the presentation to related materials. The rubric provides descriptors to guide scoring presentations as excellent, good, satisfactory, or poor in these areas.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    PSYC 364 Oral Presentation Names:

    Satisfactory Comments
    Excellent 85-100 Good 73-84 Poor 53-60
    61-72

    Quality (/4)
    Clear articulation; Fluctuation Articulation is clear Articulation isn’t always Poor articulation; Low
    in volume and inflection help enough; Satisfactory clear; Uneven volume, volume/ monotonous
    to maintain audience interest variation of volume and little or no inflection; Use tone; Improper use of
    and emphasize key points; inflection; Language is of language is language; there is no eye
    Delivery/ Expression Excellent language; Eye good; eye contact with satisfactory; there is little contact with the
    (/2) contact with audience is the audience is visual contact with the audience.
    maintained. established. audience.

    The preparation of the The preparation of the The preparation of the The preparation of the
    presentation reflects presentation reflects presentation reflects presentation reflects
    considerable effort. The good efforts. The sufficient effort. The insufficient effort. The
    Organization (/2) presentation is very well presentation is well information presented information is organized
    organized, understandable, organized, could be better organized loosely, making the
    and easy to follow. understandable, and to be able to understand presentation difficult to
    fairly easy to follow. and follow more easily. understand and follow.
    Material ( /6)

    The information is complete, The information is The information is The information is not
    accurate and relevant. The sufficient; there are some sufficient; there is a lot of complete, accurate or
    Content (/2) content is very appropriate. that are not relevant or information that is not relevant. The content is
    precise. Content is relevant or precise. The not adequate.
    adequate. content is not very
    adequate.
    The entire article is The entire article is The article is sometimes The article is not
    interpreted very well. The interpreted correctly. The interpreted correctly. The interpreted well. The links
    links between the article and links between the article links between the article between the article and
    the laboratory are clearly and the laboratory are and the laboratory are the laboratory are not
    Interpretation (/4) identified and underlined. identified and underlined. either identified or identified or emphasized.
    Demonstrates a good in- Demonstrates a underlined. Demonstrates very little
    depth understanding of the moderately thorough Demonstrates an understanding of the
    material and the article. understanding of the acceptable understanding material and / or the
    material and the article. of the material and / or article.
    the article.

    /10

    You might also like