Micro Project
Micro Project
MICRO PROJECT
Academic year: 2022-23
Study and analyze Analysis tools for trading System and draw
UML diagram and test cases
Seal of
Institution
INDEX
Academic year: 2022-23 Name of the faculty: Mrs. Sangita Bhoyar
Program code: CO-4I Course & Course code: Software Engineering (SEN)
4
1 Brief Introduction
4
2 Aim of the Micro-Project
5
3 Action Plan and Resources Required
5
4 Brief Description
11
5 Implementation & Result
18
6 Skill Developed / learning out of this Micro-Project
19
7 Teacher Evaluation Sheet
Annexure-1
3 Printer Hp Laserjet 1
Group Details:
Sr. No. Roll No Name of Student
1 45 Leonhard Dsouza
2 46 Aaditi Inamdar
3 47 Soham Jagtap
Annexure-II
Study and analyze Analysis tools for trading System and draw UML
diagram and test cases
1.0 Rationale:
Trading analysis software is a powerful tool that traders and investors use to analyze
market data and make informed trading decisions. In this software test case refers to the
actions required to verify a specific feature or functionality in software testing. The test
case details the steps, data, prerequisites, and post conditions necessary to verify a
feature and UML diagrams can be used as a way to visualize a project before it takes
place or as documentation for a project afterward..
State Diagram:-
A state diagram is a type of diagram used in computer science and related fields to describe the
behaviour of systems. State diagrams require that the system described is composed of a finite
number of states; sometimes, this is indeed the case, while at other times this is a reasonable
abstraction.
Test Cases:-
The test case is defined as a group of conditions under which a tester determines whether a
software application is working as per the customer's requirements or not. Test case
designing includes preconditions, case name, input conditions, and expected result. A test
case is a first level action and derived from test scenarios.
The primary purpose of writing a test case is to achieve the efficiency of the application.
Sr. Name of
Specifications Qty Remarks
No. Resource/material
Free open learning
1 Chrome source
2
Microsoft word
2 Laptop document 1
With internet facility
3 Printer Hp Laserjet 1
7.0 Outputs of micro-projects
ER DIAGRAM FOR TRADING ANALYSIS SOFTWARE
8.0 Skill Developed / learning out of this Micro-Project
The following skills were developed-
1 Designing: Designing of micro project with minimum required resources and
at low cost.
2 Teamwork: Learned to work in a team and boost individual confidence.
3 Time Management: Timely completion of micro project as scheduled.
4 Data Analysis: Interpretation of data: drawing and analysis of graphs,
laboratory calculations, etc.
5 Problem-solving: Develop good problem-solving habits.
6 Technical writing: Preparing a report of the proposed plan and final report.
7 Presentation: Giving working model presentation of the micro project.
References:
https://youtu.be/9mSFYWMjZuo
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/active-trading/121014/best-technical-
analysis-trading-software.asp
Annexure-III
Suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro-Project
S. Characteristic to be Poor ( Marks Average Good ( Marks Excellent
No. assessed 1-3) ( Marks 4 - 5 ) 6-8) ( Marks 9- 10 )
Relevance to the course Relate to very few Related to some LOs Take care of at-least one Take care of more than
1
LOs CO one CO
Not more than two
sources At-least 5 relevant
Literature Survey (primary and At –least 7 relevant About 10 relevant
2 sources, at least 2
/information collection secondary), very old latest sources, most latest sources, most latest
reference
Completion of the
Completed less than Completed more than 80
3 Target as per project Completed 50 to 60% Completed 60 to 80%
50% %
proposal
Enough data collected
Sufficient and
Sufficient and appropriate by sufficient and
appropriate
Sample Size small, sample, enough data appropriate sample size.
sample, enough
data neither Proper
Analysis of Data and data generated but generated
4 organized inferences drawn by
representation not organized and which is organized and
nor presented well organising and
not presented well. presented well but poor presenting data
No or poor inferences drawn through tables, charts
inferences drawn
and graphs.
Just Well
assembled/fabricated Well assembled/fabricated
and parts are not assembled/fabricated
with proper
functioning with proper functioning
parts. In proper shape, functioning parts. In
Quality of Incomplete well. Not in proper proper shape, within
5 Prototype/Model shape, dimensions within tolerance
tolerance dimensions
fabrication/assembly. beyond tolerance dimensions and good
and good
limit. finish/appearance. But
finish/appearance.
Appearance/finish is no creativity in design and
Creativity in design
shabby. use of material
and use of material
Nearly sufficient
Very short, poor and correct details
quality sketches, about methods, Very detailed, correct,
Detailed, correct and clear
Details about material, clear description of
description of methods, materials,
methods, precautions and methods, materials,
6 Report Preparation material, conclusion. but precautions and
precautions and
precaution and clarity is not there in conclusions. Enough
Conclusions. Sufficient
conclusions presentation. tables, charts and
omitted, some details But not enough Graphic Description.
sketches
are wrong graphic description.
Annexure – IV
Micro-Project Evaluation Sheet
Academic year: 2021-22 Name of the faculty: Mrs. Sangita Bhoyar
Program code: CO-4I (B) Course & Course code: Software Engineering (SEN)
Leonhard Dsouza
45
Aaditi Inamdar
46
Soham jagtap
47
……………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………..
Name and designation of the Faculty Member: Mrs SANGITA BHOYAR (Lecturer)
Signature________________