Ethics Assignment: Submitted by
Ethics Assignment: Submitted by
Ethics Assignment: Submitted by
SUBMITTED BY :
SARAH ZAHID FO6- 13 KOMAL BABAR FO6-15 ALINA RUBAB FO6-26 SAMYA SHABBIR FO6-30 YAMNA ALVI FO6-34
SUBMITTED TO :
Mr. KHURRAM AFZAL
ETHICS OF INDIVIDUAL
CONTENTS:
Introduction Individual codes of ethics Individual ethics versus professional ethics Values and ethics
ETHICS OF INDIVIDUAL
INTRODUCTION
Individual ethics is a category of philosophy that determines what an individual believes about morality and right and wrong. This is usually distinguished from business ethics or legal ethics. These branches of ethics come from outside organizations or governments, not the individual's conscience. These branches of ethics occasionally overlap. Personal ethics can affect all areas of life, including family, finances and relationships. There is some disagreement on where personal ethics originate from. Some philosophers use man's sense of morality to support the existence of God. These philosophers typically agree that a divine power instilled personal morality in humankind, creating a basic universal system of right and wrong. Evolutionists might explain humanity's personal ethics through survival of the fittest. They might teach that a species that did not place value on life could have kill itself off gradually, while a species with an ethical system that frowns upon violence and murder would be a given a greater chance to reproduce and evolve, thus passing their peaceful ethics onto new generations. Evolutionists might conclude that modern humanity now genetically inherits the ability to discern between rights and wrongs that benefit the community. Other philosophers argue that ethics are not inherent at all and that children learn right and wrong solely from social conditioning. This could be the cause of the differing personal ethics found throughout the world. These philosophers typically suggest that personal ethics are learned from families, friends and teachers. Some ethics might also be adapted from individual experiences. The purpose of personal ethics is often debated. Ideas can range from pleasing a personal god to creating a thriving community to learning the best way to please oneself. Religion inspires a large portion of personal ethics. Many devoted followers are willing to adhere to a specific morality system on faith alone Others are motivated by humanitarian interests. These personal ethics can breed lofty goals. Some people shape their actions and priorities around ending world hunger, slowing global warming or encouraging world peace. Humanitarian efforts can also be more subtle, such as random acts of kindness for a neighbor or volunteering as a tutor. Sometimes different motivations can blend together. A religious person might make personal ethical choices that simultaneously please her god while also helping her community.
Significance
o
A personal code of ethics is a necessary ingredient to achieve success or overcome adversity. In the absence of rules, it's difficult to hold oneself accountable for poor decision-making or bad behavior
Integrity
o
Integrity is a major part of a personal code of ethics. It refers to character and decision-making in various situations. Integrity, as it relates to a personal code of ethics, means not compromising one's beliefs under any circumstances.
Commitment
o
Successful implementation of a personal code of ethics requires commitment to a specific purpose and internal discipline.
Purpose
o
A personal code of ethics must have a definite purpose. In most cases, it is used to correct or eliminate an unwanted behavior. In other instances, it is used to help achieve goals, such as creating a successful marriage.
Benefits
o
Having a personal code of ethics makes it easier to focus on goals. A written code of ethics can be modified as a person grows closer to becoming who she's striving to be. It can be referred to regularly to evaluate successes and identify areas where improvement is needed.
operating values, it may be difficult to determine what is "right." An example might be a company that has among its stated values to treat everyone with dignity and respect, but whose norms have permitted and perhaps even encouraged a pattern of sexual harassment over a number of years. Do those in the organization know that the behavior is wrong, but condone it nevertheless? Is it clear to the Bosnian Serbs that ethnic cleansing is unethical and wrong, or would it fall under the mantle of behavior that is considered to be acceptable in that society? Listen to the arguments in support of ethnic cleansing that have been made, and you will find that many of the perpetrators argued that they did nothing wrong, and were only righting previous wrongs done to them.