Untitled
Untitled
MBHP increased non-organizational religiosity, although the effect was not sustained
6 months later. To our knowledge, this is the first mindfulness-based intervention
RCT to empirically demonstrate these effects among police officers. Self-compassion,
mindfulness trait, and spirituality mechanisms of change are examined.
Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov. identifier: NCT03114605.
Keywords: mindfulness, police officer, quality of life, depression, anxiety, religiosity, well-being, self-compassion
inner-city teachers (65). Published in 2016, a single-arm pilot Participants and Settings
study pioneered the field of MT within law enforcement officers Police officers working at two major Brazilian cities were
(LEOs), suggesting positive effects following mindfulness-based recruited from 2016 to 2018.
resilience training (MBRT)—an 8-week mindfulness-based stress (1) Civil Police. The study center in Porto Alegre was located
reduction (MBSR) adaptation designed to enhance resilience at the Police Hall of the State of Rio Grande do Sul. Civil
for LEOs in the context of stressors inherent to policing— Police main duties are to oversee public order and security,
on outcomes such as perceived stress, burnout, emotional adopt measures necessary to avoid danger or injury to persons
intelligence, and mental and physical health (66). Since and public or private property, and ensure the administration
then, three other trials have replicated and extended those of criminal offenses, including execution of arrest warrants and
benefits (67–69). requisitions requested by the judicial branch.
With the development of positive psychiatry, specialty scope (2) Civil Guard. The study center in São Paulo was
incorporates—along with the treatment of mental illness— located at the headquarters of Unifesp Santo Amaro. Civil
psychosocial interventions targeting those at high risk of Guard fundamental duties include the protection of goods,
developing mental or physical illness, and goals encompass services, and municipal facilities, as well as patrolling areas and
increased well-being and positive psychosocial characteristics preventive policing.
(e.g., resilience, spirituality, religiosity) (70). Two reviews Participants meeting the following inclusion criteria were
concluded that randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed enrolled: (1) active police officers; (2) 21–65 years old; (3)
to clarify the role of psychosocial interventions for stress availability to attend eight sessions; (4) willingness to participate
management and mental health/well-being promotion among voluntarily. Exclusion criteria included (1) previous involvement
police officers (71, 72). In light of these findings, the in any MBI or regular mindfulness practice over the last 3
burden of high-stress levels and mental health problems months, or one of the following diagnosis, assessed by the
epidemic in the police, plus aforementioned MBIs’ salutary Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): (2) major
effects, further empirical evaluation of MBIs’ impact on that depressive episode (current); (3) manic or hypomanic episode
vulnerable population is needed. The POLICE (imPact Of a (current); (4) psychotic syndrome (current or past); (5) substance
mindfuLness-based Intervention on burnout and quality of use disorder (past 12 months, except tobacco); (6) risk of suicide.
life in poliCE officers) study is a multicenter RCT evaluating
the efficacy of mindfulness-based health promotion (MBHP)
to promote police officers’ QoL and mental health at post- Procedures
intervention and after 6 months. As designated at the The POLICE study was advertised within the two Police
research protocol manuscript (73), our hypothesis is that Institutions using the internet, social media, and posters. Officers
officers allocated to MBHP, compared with a waiting list who showed interest contacted the research team by phone or
(WL), will show enhancement on QoL and reduction on email and were initially screened. Potential participants had
burnout symptoms (primary outcomes), besides improvement a face-to-face interview scheduled where they were provided
on several mental health measures (secondary outcomes). We detailed information about the study and inclusion/exclusion
also investigated primary outcomes of potential mechanisms of criteria were assessed. Eligible volunteers filled the informed
change through mediation and moderation analysis. Mediators consent form and were randomly assigned to MBHP or
clarify how/why intervention works, while moderators identify WL by an independent researcher who were unaware of the
whom or under what conditions interventions have effects characteristics of the study and was not involved in the trial
(74). The POLICE study design overcomes previous studies’ or had access to study data. Randomization was implemented
limitations such as absence of control group/follow-up or small using sealed envelopes. Officers allocated to the WL group
sample sizes. did not receive any intervention for 6 months. After the
6-month assessment, MBHP was offered for all participants
randomized to the WL group. Officers received authorization
MATERIALS AND METHODS from the Police Institutions to attend the program which
happened during working hours. Due to the nature of the
A detailed description of POLICE study Materials and Methods intervention, the POLICE study was single-blind—the outcomes
is available at the research protocol manuscript (73). assessment was blind, albeit participants were aware of their
group assignment. While we initially planned to randomize
Design 160 participants (allowing for up to 20% loss to follow-
The POLICE study was a multicentric, parallel, two-armed up) to detect a moderate effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.05)
RCT with three assessment points: baseline, post-intervention, with a power of 0.80 and an alpha of 0.05, from the 194
and 6-month follow-up (73). Participants were randomized participants screened, 170 officers met enrollment criteria and
to MBHP—an 8-week MBI—or a WL control group. The were randomized. We defined participants as external police
clinical trial protocol was prepared in accordance with SPIRIT officers if during the study they were exerting operational
2013 statement (75) and was approved by the centers’ ethical activities and as internal police officers if their contact with
committees. Figure 1 shows the CONSORT flow diagram civilians was done inside police agencies or they were assigned
through the study. to administrative roles.
data were transcribed via single entry to the password-protected relationships, and environment, besides overall QoL and general
software. Primary and secondary outcomes were previously health facets. WHOQOL-BREF Portuguese version exhibits
reported (73). This article will specifically report the findings strong psychometric properties (85). Cronbach’s α in the present
related to QoL, anxiety and depression symptoms, and religiosity. sample was physical health, α = 0.79; psychological, α = 0.84;
We will also address MBHP feasibility and the possible role of social relationships, α = 0.79; and environment, α = 0.76.
mediators (i.e., mindfulness trait, decentering, self-compassion,
and spirituality) and moderators (i.e., sex, age, number of Secondary Outcomes
sessions, mindfulness trait, decentering, self-compassion, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
spirituality) to post-intervention QoL improvement as formerly Fourteen-item scale that quantifies the severity of anxiety
proposed (73). Because the Connor-Davidson-25 Scale of (HADS-A) and depressive symptoms (HADS-D) in community
Resilience (CD-RISC-25) was not applied to all participants, we and hospital settings. HADS Portuguese version shows good
excluded resilience from our mediation and moderation analysis. psychometric properties (86). Cronbach’s α in the present sample
was 0.81 for HADS-A and 0.78 for HADS-D.
Primary Outcome
World Health Organization Quality of Duke University Religion Index (DUREL)
Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) Five-item instrument capturing three dimensions of religiosity:
Twenty-six-item instrument that produces scores for four organizational religiosity (OR), non-organizational religiosity
domains related to QoL: physical health, psychological, social (NOR), and intrinsic religiosity (IR). The NOR subscale measures
private religious activities (e.g., prayer, meditation, Scripture and the 95% CI were calculated for within- and between-group
study), while the OR subscale involves public religious activities. comparisons, based on Botella and Sanchez-Meca, and Cumming
IR subscale assesses the degree of personal religious commitment and Calin-Jageman recommendations (100, 101). Mediation
or motivation, pursuing religion as an ultimate end in itself (43). hypothesis was tested by bootstrap regression analysis using
DUREL Portuguese version presents high internal consistency the Preacher and Hayes approach (PROCESS) (Model 4) (102).
and discriminant validity (87). Cronbach’s α in the present study The pre-to-post changes in mindfulness (MAAS), decentering
was 0.88. (EQ), self-compassion (SCS), and spirituality (WHOQOL-SRPB-
BREF) were included as proposed mediators between group and
Mechanisms of Change QoL outcome. Separate moderation analyses were conducted for
Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) WHOQOL-BREF using the Bootstrapping PROCESS (model 1).
Fifteen-item scale designed to assess a core characteristic Independent moderation models were tested for each proposed
of dispositional mindfulness. MAAS Portuguese version has mediator: sex, age, number of sessions, and pre-to-post changes
adequate reliability and validity (88). Cronbach’s α in the present on mindfulness (MAAS), decentering (EQ), self-compassion
study was 0.96. (SCS), and spirituality (WHOQOL-SRPB-BREF). Significant
moderation was followed up by significant interaction between
Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) the independent variable (X) (group: WL vs. MBHP) and the
Twenty-six-item instrument measuring six components of self- dependent variable (Y) (pre-to-post changes in WHOQOL-
compassion. Portuguese SCS version exhibits good psychometric BREF). Statistical analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS
properties (89). Cronbach’s α in the present study was 0.81. version 23 for Windows.
WHOQOL-SRPB-BREF
Thirty-four-item scale evaluating QoL domains of spirituality, RESULTS
religiosity, and personal beliefs. WHOQOL-SRPB-BREF Baseline Data and Participant
Portuguese version shows strong psychometric properties (90).
Characteristics
Cronbach’s α in the present study was 0.88.
Descriptive statistics and sociodemographic characteristics of
participants are shown in Table 2. No statistically significant
Data Analysis differences between groups were found on any sociodemographic
Group differences at baseline on demographic data and outcome data, or on primary and secondary outcomes at baseline.
variables were evaluated using χ 2 -tests for categorical variables
and Student’s t-test for continuous data. Intention-to-treat
Feasibility
(ITT) mixed-models analyses without any ad hoc imputation
We randomized 87.6% (n = 170 out of 194) of officers assessed
were used to account for missing data with the restricted
for eligibility. Due to reported lack of time, four individuals did
maximum likelihood estimation (REML) (91), rather than
not start the intervention. Participants who were randomized to
repeated measures ANOVA described in the original protocol
the MBHP arm and started the intervention (n = 84) attended a
based on the authors’ recommendation and due to the amount
mean of 6.44 (SD 2.14) of eight weekly sessions, 82.1% (n = 69)
of missing data. The mixed-model approach is appropriate
attended at least four sessions, and 69% (n = 58) at least
for RCTs with multiple time points and pre-only to post-
six sessions. Eight-week assessment was completed by 75.3%
only designs, it does not assume that the last measurement is
(n = 128) and 6-month follow-up was answered by 71.2% (n =
stable, it does not involve any substitution of missing values
121) of the enrolled sample.
with supposed or estimated values, it is conducted using all
available observations (92, 93), and it is robust to violations
of distributional assumptions (94). A linear mixed model for
Change in Primary and Secondary
each primary and secondary outcome measure was implemented Outcomes From Pre- to Post-intervention
with time (pre, post, and follow-up) as within-group factor and 6-Month Follow-Up
and group (WL and MBHP) as between-group factor using Primary Outcome: Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF)
the MIXED procedure with a random intercept for subject. Results for the WHOQOL-BREF showed a significant group
An identity covariance structure was specified to model the × time interaction effect in all QoL domains—physical health
covariance structure of the intercept. Wald statistic (or Z-test) [F (2,252.59) = 13.83; p < 0.001], psychological [F (2,245.89) = 20.36;
was conducted to test the residual error variance estimation p < 0.001], social relationships [F (2,248.25) = 9.02; p < 0.001],
and the null hypothesis of homogeneity of residuals (95, 96). and environment [F (2,250.096) = 15.20; p < 0.001], the overall
Significant effects were followed up with pairwise contrasts QoL facet [F (2,251.98) = 7.51; p < 0.01), and general health
adjusted by Bonferroni correction. These statistical tests have facet [F (2,254.216) = 5.10; p < 0.05]. Within-group comparisons
shown their robustness regardless of violations of the required revealed a significant pre-to-post and pre-to 6-month follow-
assumptions when group sizes are equal (97). Results are reported up changes in MBHP group for physical health [F (2,251.67) =
in line with conventional ANOVA, as mixed-model repeated 18.65; p < 0.001], psychological [F (2,244.84) = 19.12; p < 0.001],
measures, according to studies that used this approach for social relationship [F (2,247.02) = 12.72; p < 0.001], environment
repeated measures designs (98, 99). Effect sizes (Cohen’s d) [F (2,248.77) = 18.67; p < 0.001], overall QoL [F (2,249.20) = 9.13;
Means and SDs are represented for age (years). WL, waiting list control group; MBHP, mindfulness-based health promotion.
p < 0.001], and general health [F (2,252.38) = 15.16; p < 0.001]. group (Table 4). Type of work (i.e., internal vs. external) was not
No significant changes were found in WL group except for a significant covariate for DUREL measure (F-values from 0.023
pre-to-post reductions on the psychological domain (Table 3). to 0.867; all ps > 0.05).
Between-group comparisons showed significant differences
between groups, indicating higher scores in the MBHP group
at post and 6-month follow-up compared with the WL control
Mediators for WHOQOL-BREF Increase
group across all domains and facets (Table 4). After MBHP (Pre-to-post Intervention)
Additional mixed-model analyses showed that the type of Mediation results showed a significant indirect effect of MBHP
work (i.e., internal vs. external) was not a significant covariate on the change of QoL outcome through the change of
for WHOQOL-BREF domains and facets (F-values from 0.019 to self-compassion scores (SCSs) from pre-to-post intervention
1.563; all ps > 0.05). (Figure 2). Specifically, the total score of the SCS remained as
the only significant mediator for pre-to-post changes on physical
health [b = 0.94 (0.33), Ba CI 95% [0.34, 1.70]; R2 = 0.25],
Secondary Outcomes: Depression and Anxiety psychological [b = 1.33 (0.32), Ba CI 95% [0.78, 2.03]; R2 = 0.47],
(HADS), Religiosity (DUREL) social relationships [b = 1.31 (0.37), Ba CI 95% [0.67, 2.16];
A significant group × time interaction effect was found for both R2 = 0.26], environment [b = 0.75 (0.26), Ba CI 95% [0.29, 1.32];
HADS subscales, Depression [F (2,247.44) = 12.52; p < 0.001] R2 = 0.26], overall QoL [b = 1.27 (0.40), Ba CI95% [0.54, 2.18];
and Anxiety [F (2,167.70) = 12.76; p < 0.001], and statistically R2 = 0.22], and general health [b = 1.15 (0.38), Ba CI 95% [0.45,
significant differences between groups were found at post and 1.89]; R2 = 0.18].
6-month follow-up, showing lower scores in the MBHP group
compared with the WL group for both depression and anxiety
subscales (Table 4). At pre-intervention, 32 (18.9%) and 52 Moderators for WHOQOL-BREF Increase
(30.8%) participants scored above HADS-D and HADS-A cut-off After MBHP
(≥8), whereas at post-intervention, 20 (16.2%) and 27 (22.3%) Moderation was demonstrated by a significant interaction effect
officers scored above the cut-off, respectively. When considering for general health facet, indicating that the relationship between
the MBHP group, 16 (18.2%) and 29 (32.9%) valid responses were the group and the pre-to-post change on the general health
above HADS-D and HADS-A cut-off scores at pre-intervention, score was independently moderated by the pre-to-post change
and 3 (4.7%) and 8 (12.7%) at post-intervention, respectively. in MAAS [b = 1.28 (0.61), 95% CI [0.67, 2.49], t = 2.09, p <
Type of work was not a significant covariate for depression 0.05] and spirituality scores (WHOQOL-SRPB-BREF) [b = 0.098
[F (1,163.46) = 0.13; p > 0.05] and anxiety [F (1,162.30) = 0.05; p > (0.04), 95% CI [0.012, 0.18], t = 2.25, p < 0.05]. Specifically,
0.05] subscales. increases on MAAS [b = 3.64 (1.02), 95% CI [1.63, 5.66], t = 3.59,
For DUREL, results showed only a significant p < 0.01] and spirituality (WHOQOL-SRPB-BREF) [b = 0.3.26
interaction effect on non-organizational religiosity subscale (0.86), 95% CI [1.55, 4.96], t = 3.78, p < 0.01] at post significantly
[F (2,241.62) = 3.51; p < 0.05]. Specifically, between-group moderated the group effect for general health. Sex, age, number of
comparison revealed statistically significant differences at post sessions, and changes in self-compassion and decentering scores
where the MBHP reported higher scores compared with the WL were not yielded as significant moderators.
Trombka et al.
TABLE 3 | Means, SDs, and within-group effect sizes for primary and secondary outcomes at pre-, post-intervention, and 6-month follow-up.
Outcome Pre Post FU Pre vs. post Pre vs. FU Pre Post FU Pre vs. post Pre vs. FU
(N = 82) (N = 62) (N = 60) Mean dif.; d (95% CI) Mean dif.; d (95% CI) (N = 88) (N = 66) (N = 61) Mean dif.; d (95% CI) Mean dif.; d (95% CI)
WHOQOL-BREF
Physical health 14.49 (2.51) 14.00 (3.12) 14.32 (2.83) 0.40 0.24 14.70 (2.44) 16.26 (2.20) 16.12 (2.19) 1.52*** 1.28***
d = −0.19 (−0.41, 0.02) d = −0.07 (−0.30, 0.07) d = 0.63 (0.37, 0.89) d = 0.57 (0.33, 0.82)
Psychological 14.60 (2.49) 13.87 (3.18) 14.42 (2.53) 0.80** 0.25 14.83 (2.40) 16.47 (1.79) 16.16 (2.24) 1.42*** 1.09***
d = −0.13 (−0.34, 0.08) d = −0.03 (−0.21, 0.15) d = 0.66 (0.42, 0.91) d = 0.54 (0.29, 0.78)
Social relationships 13.89 (3.20) 13.43 (3.77) 13.84 (2.92) 0.38 0.19 14.12 (3.14) 15.79 (2.26) 15.50 (2.89) 1.58*** 1.25**
d = −0.14 (−0.37, 0.08) d = −0.03 (−0.30, 0.23) d = 0.53 (0.28, 0.77) d = 0.43 (0.20, 0.67)
Environment 13.50 (2.44) 13.14 (2.75) 13.78 (2.34) 0.38 0.35 13.31 (2.10) 14.72 (1.69) 14.68 (1.96) 1.26*** 1.23***
d = −0.15 (−0.36, 0.07) d = 0.11 (−0.12, 0.35) d = 0.66 (0.40, 0.93) d = 0.61 (0.39, 0.90)
Overall quality of life 14.86 (3.42) 14.41 (3.66) 14.40 (4.04) 0.38 0.53 14.95 (3.12) 16.49 (1.80) 16.72 (1.80) 1.40** 1.60**
d = −0.13 (−0.34, 0.09) d = −0.13 (−0.43, 0.16) d = 0.49 (0.16, 0.81) d = 0.56 (0.23, 0.89)
General health 12.74 (3.80) 12.97 (4.51) 13.67 (3.83) 0.11 0.77 13.50 (3.70) 15.69 (3.11) 15.74 (2.72) 2.04*** 1.93***
d = 0.06 (−0.17, 0.29) d = 0.24 (−0.03, 0.52) d = 0.58 (0.34, 0.83) d = 0.60 (0.33, 0.86)
HADS
Anxiety 7.06 (3.43) 7.55 (3.62) 7.68 (3.91) 0.49 0.77 6.80 (3.75) 5.10 (3.01) 5.82 (3.31) 1.63*** 1.61***
d = 0.14 (−0.09, 0.37) d = 0.18 (−0.09, 0.44) d = −0.44 (−0.69, −0.21) d = −0.26 (−0.52, 0.00)
Depression 5.68 (3.48) 6.78 (3.98) 7.14 (3.74) 1.04* 1.52** 5.45 (3.22) 3.56 (2.52) 4.74 (4.14) 1.74* 0.59
8
d = 0.31 (0.09, 0.54) d = 0.41 (0.16, 0.67) d = −0.58 (−0.87, −0.29) d = −0.21 (−0.52, 0.08)
DUREL
Organizational 3.25 (1.51) 3.20 (1.68) 3.26 (1.47) 0.11 0.01 3.40 (1.43) 3.32 (1.37) 3.46 (1.47) 0.09 0.07
religiosity d = −0.03 (−0.18, 0.12) d = 0.01 (−0.19, 0.20) d = −0.06 (−0.19, 0.08) d = 0.04 (−0.15, 0.23)
Non-organizational 3.70 (1.64) 3.50 (1.76) 3.52 (1.63) 0.28 0.17 3.67 (1.63) 4.03 (1.60) 3.75 (1.54) 0.31 0.02
religiosity d = −0.12 (−0.32, 0.08) d = −0.11 (−0.33, 0.11) d = 0.21 (0.04, 0.39) d = 0.05 (−0.17, 0.23)
Intrinsic religiosity 11.16 (3.44) 11.63 (3.50) 11.48 (3.17) 0.24 0.23 11.49 (3.15) 11.88 (3.34) 12.13 (3.29) 0.44 0.39
d = 0.13 (−0.01, 0.28) d = 0.09 (−0.10, 0.27) d = 0.12 (−0.01, 0.23) d = 0.20 (0.05, 0.36)
Overall DUREL 18.11 (5.85) 18.32 (6.15) 18.26 (5.65) 0.19 0.05 18.55 (5.40) 19.23 (5.38) 19.34 (5.35) 0.65 0.24
d = 0.04 (−0.09, 0.16) d = 0.03 (−0.13, 0.18) d = 0.12 (0.01, 0.24) d = 0.14 (0.00, 0.29)
Means and SDs are represented for primary and secondary outcomes. Pre, pre-treatment; Post, post-intervention; FU, 6-month follow-up; d, Cohen’s d; WHOQOL-BREF, World Health Organization Quality of Life–BREF; HADS, Hospital
February 2021 | Volume 12 | Article 624876
Anxiety and Depression Scale; DUREL, Duke University Religion Index. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Means differences are described with absolute values and were calculated using estimated marginal means adjusted by
Outcome Pre (MBHP vs. WL) Post (MBHP vs. WL) FU (MBHP vs. WL)
WHOQOL-BREF
Physical health F (1, 262) = 0.20 F (1, 320) = 23.62*** 0.84 (0.48, 1.20) F (1, 330) = 14.86*** 0.71 (0.34, 1.07)
Psychological F (1, 241) = 0.28 F (1, 298) = 33.72*** 1.01 (0.64, 1.38) F (1, 309) = 13.38*** 0.72 (0.36, 1.09)
Social relationships F (1, 262 ) = 0.25 F (1, 324) = 17.53*** 0.76 (0.40, 1.12) F (1, 334) = 9.81** 0.57 (0.20, 0.93)
Environment F (1, 257) = 0.54 F (1, 317) = 13.95*** 0.69 (0.34, 1.05) F (1, 328) = 12.52*** 0.41 (0.05, 0.77)
Overall quality of life F (1, 312) = 0.05 F (1, 365) = 11.28** 0.72 (0.37, 1.08) F (1, 373) = 15.16*** 0.74 (0.37, 1.11)
General health F (1, 281) = 0.21 F (1, 341) = 17.45*** 0.70 (0.34, 1.06) F (1, 351) = 8.41** 0.62 (0.26, 0.98)
HADS
Anxiety F (1, 253) = 0.21 F (1, 315) = 15.33*** −0.73 (−1.09, −0.38) F (1, 339) = 17.19*** −0.51 (−0.87, −0.15)
Depression F (1, 277) = 0.15 F (1, 336) = 24.46*** −0.97 (−1.33, −0.60) F (1, 356) = 13.43*** −0.60 (−0.97, −0.24)
DUREL
Organizational religiosity F (1, 215) = 0.55 F (1, 263) = 0.58 0.08 (−0.27, 0.42) F (1, 270) = 0.11 0.14 (−0.22, 0.49)
Non-organizational religiosity F (1, 230) = 0.005 F (1, 289) = 4.29* 0.31 (0.04, 0.66) F (1, 297) = 0.26 0.14 (−0.21, 0.50)
Intrinsic religiosity F (1, 199) = 0.40 F (1, 236) = 0.96 0.07 (−0.27, 0.42) F (1, 241) = 0.72 0.14 (−0.04, 0.66)
Overall DUREL F (1, 192) = 0.30 F (1, 223) = 2.06 0.16 (−0.19, 0.50) F (1, 227) = 0.53 0.20 (−0.16, 0.55)
Post, post-intervention; FU, 6-month follow-up; d, Cohen’s d; WHOQOL-BREF, World Health Organization Quality of Life–BREF; HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; DUREL,
Duke University Religion Index. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
FIGURE 2 | Mediation analyses for pre-to-post changes on quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF). SCS, Self-Compassion Scale. All coefficients represent unstandardized
beta coefficients (standard errors in parentheses). Mediators and dependent variables are pre-to-post changes. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
large effect sizes. Notably, at 6-month follow-up, the difference inadequate training, lack of equipment, corruption, hostile
between groups across all QoL domains and facets remained public image, bureaucracy, and rigid hierarchy, in addition to
significant indicating medium effect sizes. As expected, the hazing, discrimination, sexism, and racism within departments,
psychological domain was the one that showed the largest effect may represent Brazilian police work-related stressors that
size magnitude between groups both at post-intervention and possibly explain these findings (6, 23, 118, 119). Inasmuch as
at 6-month follow-up. These findings are consistent with Grupe organizational conditions affect the Police Institution as a whole,
et al.’s (68) single-arm study with 30 LEOs who exhibited it explains why the covariate analysis showed that internal and
increased psychological well-being after 8 weeks of MT and with external police officers equivalently benefit from the intervention.
Christopher et al.’s (66) pioneering single-arm pilot (n = 43) that Brazilian police scientific literature de facto demonstrates that
reported increased LEO global mental health following MBRT. stress levels are similar between officers exerting operational or
Noteworthy, a study by the UK College of Policing suggests that administrative roles (120, 121), in line with international data
online mindfulness resources improve officers’ well-being (103). pointing that organizational stressors may be more challenging
Our results are in accordance with the literature that indicates than operational experiences (122).
MT’s positive impact in QoL and well-being across different The significant interaction effect and difference between
populations (55, 81, 104), including military and war veterans groups on non-organizational (private) religiosity at post-
(58, 62, 105, 106). intervention can be attributed to the possibility that many
MBHP presented efficacy to decrease depression symptoms at participants considered mindfulness meditation a private
post-intervention and at 6-month follow-up, displaying large and religious activity and/or MT led participants to increase private
medium effect sizes, respectively. These results are in line with religious activities such as other types of meditation, prayer,
Grupe et al. (68) pre–post pilot findings that exhibited a trend etc. MBHP, such as MBSR, is a secular behavioral medicine
level decrease on depression symptoms with medium effect size intervention that teaches skills addressed to reduce universal
after MT. Individuals allocated to receive MBHP also showed human suffering where spiritual themes are not explicitly
reduced levels of anxiety when compared with the control explored. That being said, MBIs can enhance transcendence
group both at post-intervention and at 6-month follow-up with and awareness of interconnectedness in which oneself is not
medium effect sizes. While Christopher et al.’s (67) rigorous RCT seen as separate from everyday activities, other people, or the
that enrolled 61 LEOs did not find a significant reduction on world (123); thus, studies consistently have been suggesting
anxiety symptoms, the authors stated that the small sample size that it might lead to increments in spirituality/religiosity
and type II error could explain the findings given that the trial (56, 124–126). MBHP components of values clarification and
main aim was to explore MBRT feasibility and acceptability. Our compassion/loving-kindness practices for oneself and others
results resonate with the aforementioned Grupe et al. pilot (68) potentially contributed to this finding. It is also important to
that showed a salient reduction in anxiety symptoms after MT mention that Brazil is a highly religious country (predominantly
which persisted after 5 months. Furthermore, a growing body of catholic) where 90% of the population identify with a spiritual
evidence denotes MT’s declining effects on depression symptoms or religious group (127), and in our sample, that proportion
among military personnel (107–110). was ∼80%.
Whereas, the scientific literature is still not clear about
how long MBI effects last, its psychological benefits tend to
decrease over time (111, 112). Previous studies with MBIs and Mediation and Moderation
police personnel mental health follow-up have mixed results The hypothesis that self-compassion could mediate QoL
(67, 68). Persistent salutary effects of MHBP after 6 months improvement was confirmed for all QoL domain and facets.
should be highlighted; however, the study design does not Self-compassion has empirically shown to mediate MBI’s
illuminate its longstanding impact as prolonged follow-up was effects on mental health and well-being (128–133). It is
not performed. The WL within-group significant reductions in associated with a wide variety of positive outcomes related
QoL psychological domain after 8 weeks and the increment in to psychological well-being and QoL (e.g., life satisfaction,
depression symptoms after 8 weeks and at 6-month follow-up positive affect, social connectedness, flourishing) (48, 134–137)
(Table 3) could be explained as a consequence of dealing with and inversely associated with psychopathology (i.e., depression,
new stressors intrinsic to the police activity without mindfulness anxiety, stress, suppression of unwanted thoughts, self-criticism,
skills or due to the nocebo effect and frustration, disappointment, shame, anger) (137–141). Emotional regulation deficits and
and anger about not being offered MBHP immediately (113). experiential avoidance are linked to depression, anxiety, and a
Police officers’ QoL and mental health impairment lower QoL (142, 143). Denial, suppression, and avoidance of
represented in the baseline assessment lower scores when negative emotions are emotional regulation strategies commonly
compared with populational national and international samples used by officers and those who are able to identify their
might have contributed to the intervention impact (85, 114–116). feelings and be present to moment-to-moment experience show
For instance, the poor mental health of our non-clinical sample better mental health (144–146). The police toughness culture
is expressed by the average score of 7.06 on HADS-Anxiety combined with exposure to uncontrollable situations, violence,
(Table 3), close to the ≥8 cut-off score that presents sensitivity and potentially traumatic situations results in high levels of
and specificity for anxiety disorders of ∼0.8 (117). Exposure shame, guilt, isolation, self-critical thinking, anger, and trauma-
to extensive criminality, low wages, long and irregular shifts, related disorders (2, 11, 146–148); therefore, self-compassion
emerges as a crucial skill to be learned and cultivated. First- the relevance and potential societal impact of applying MBIs
generation MBIs (i.e., MBSR, MBCT) did not explicitly teach self- within the police environment and its design—a multicenter
compassion skills, but they are interwoven into the mindfulness RCT with follow-up assessment. RCTs are the “gold standard”
instructions (e.g., “whenever you notice that the mind has in evidence-based medicine and the only type of study able
wandered off, bring it back with gentleness and kindness”) to establish causation. Other key strengths are the sample
(149, 150). In addition to implicit teaching, MBHP curriculum size that allowed us to detect differences between groups and
(73, 76) includes didactive teaching on compassion (e.g., fears of the focus on mental health/quality of life promotion and
compassion), formal practices of compassion/loving kindness for prevention of psychological suffering. Given mental illness’
oneself and informal practices (i.e., attention for self-compassion emotional, physical, economic, and social cost, a balanced
in routine activity), providing explicit opportunities for inner approach between early intervention strategies and treatment
compassion cultivation. is needed, consonant with preventive medicine and positive
Mindfulness trait and spirituality group effect moderation psychiatry (70, 164).
for WHOQOL-BREF general health facet pre–post changes are
consistent with the literature that associates both characteristics
with self-regulated behavior (151–153) and better health (154– CONCLUSION AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
157) in a variety of settings, including policing (69, 146, 158).
Alsubaie et al.’s systematic review of MBCT and MBSR (159) The POLICE study makes an important contribution to the
concluded that global change in mindfulness are linked to emerging field of MT for police mental health and QoL.
better health outcomes. Historically, it should be remembered Although on its infancy, results from the first trials are
that MBSR—the first MBI—was developed in 1979 for people promising. Qualitative studies are needed to understand
with chronic health conditions with the intention to create a officers’ attitudes, feelings, and behaviors toward MT in
vehicle for the effective training of medical patients in relatively greater depth (e.g., language attunement; potential obstacles
intensive mindfulness meditation and its immediate applications and resistances related to police norms and customs; impact
to stress, pain, and illness (77). The fact that the number on family life). Occupational health literature suggests that
of sessions attended did not moderate the effect on QoL is physical exercise, MBIs, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and
aligned with Carmody and Baer’s review (160) demonstrating change in organizational practices promote mental health
no significant correlation between number of in-class MBSR and well-being with no particular superiority, although
hours and mean effect size. Moreover, our research group had more rigorous evaluations are needed (165). Future police
previously suggested that an abbreviated MBI (four sessions) may RCTs should use active control interventions. Long-term
have a similar efficacy to a standard MBI (eight sessions) in a follow-up, cost-effectiveness data, cross-cultural research, and
non-clinical population (161). replication on male samples will play a pivotal role for the
field expansion. Complementary neurobiological, cognitive,
Feasibility behavioral, and psychometric measures addressing mechanisms
The findings indicate that MBHP is feasible among Brazilian (e.g., attentional/cognitive control, emotional regulation,
police officers. Randomization process was successful interoceptive awareness, rumination) and a wide scope of
considering that baseline characteristics were similar in both outcomes, encompassing health and well-being; workplace (e.g.,
groups. Initial dropout rate was low, and most of the participants interpersonal relationships, absenteeism, safety, leadership,
accepted the randomization and completed the assessments. return on investment); societal (e.g., mental capital, ethics,
MBI’s “completion” has been defined as attending four or more impact on civilians); and effective policing (e.g., impulse control,
sessions (112). In view of these criteria, our completion rate was working memory, task performance) perspectives should be on
high and comparable with previous MBI studies (162), including the research agenda. Importantly, if mindfulness and loving-
within the police (67, 68). kindness meditation could reduce implicit racial bias (166, 167),
its impact in decreasing officers’ stereotype-biased judgments
Strengths and Limitations and behaviors would warrant further investigation. “Stepped-
The empirical results reported herein should be considered care” and “low intensity–high volume” approaches (168) can
in the light of some limitations. Our sample was composed increase accessibility and facilitate the nurturing of “Mindful
predominantly of female officers (Table 2) working at two of Police Departments.” Evidence-based programs designed for
the most violent cities in the world (119). We used a waitlist cultivation and embodiment of self-compassion skills such
control design rather than an active control intervention. While as mindful self-compassion (169) and compassion cultivation
there are ethical advantages to a waitlist design because it training (170) or the interweaving of self-compassion practices
allows for the provision of care to research participants who in MT are auspicious. Rigorous research will inform and guide
are seeking help while permitting a non-intervention evaluation, procedures, public policy decision-making, and systematic real-
such design may overestimate intervention effects (163). Finally, world implementation of MT for Police Institutions around the
single data entry may be associated with errors within the globe, nourishing the conditions for officers’ physical, emotional,
registry and a MIXED procedure with a random intercept and mental fitness, and contributing to the judicious and mindful
for subject was conducted but test for random slope was not use of police power and authority, which could benefit society as
considered. The POLICE study has several strengths including a whole.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT writing. MD, SA, and KC coordinated the study at São Paulo
center. SA was particularly involved in the implementation and
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be conduction of the project at this site. MT and NR coordinated
made available by the authors, without undue reservation. the study implementation and conduction at Porto Alegre center.
KC and AW were responsible for data curation. JG-C and
ETHICS STATEMENT ZS-O commented and critically reviewed the manuscript for
important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the
The study was approved by HCPA and UNIFESP Research final manuscript.
Ethics Committees under number 60406416.9.1001.5327. The
patients/participants provided their written informed consent to FUNDING
participate in this study.
This work was supported by CAPES Brasil - Coordenação
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior under
Grant 88882.346691 – Finance Code 001; by Hospital de
MT, MD, and NR were responsible for manuscript writing, Clínicas de Porto Alegre Research Incentive Fund and
co-conceptualized, designed the study, and obtained funding. by Mente Aberta - Brazilian Center for Mindfulness and
DC were responsible for statistical analysis and manuscript Health Promotion.
REFERENCES 16. Sareen J, Cox BJ, Afifi TO, De Graaf R, Asmundson GJG, Ten Have M, et
al. Anxiety disorders and risk for suicidal ideation and suicide attempts:
1. Anderson GS, Litzenberger R, Plecas D. Physical evidence of police officer a population-based longitudinal study of adults. Arch General Psychiatry.
stress. Policing. (2002) 25:399–420. doi: 10.1108/13639510210429437 (2005) 62:1249–57. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.11.1249
2. Violanti JM, Charles LE, Virginia W, Mccanlies E, Hartley TA, Baughman P. 17. Bolton JM, Cox BJ, Afifi TO, Enns MW, Bienvenu OJ, Sareen J. Anxiety
Police stressors and health: a state-of-the-art review. Policing. (2017) 40:642– disorders and risk for suicide attempts: findings from the Baltimore
56. doi: 10.1108/PIJPSM-06-2016-0097 epidemiologic catchment area follow-up study. Depression Anxiety. (2008)
3. Axel BM, Valle J. South Florida’s approach to police stress management. 25:477–81. doi: 10.1002/da.20314
Police Stress. (1979) 1:13–4. 18. Heyman M, Dill J, Robert Douglas N. The Ruderman White Paper on Mental
4. Collins PA, Gibbs ACC. Stress in police officers: a study of the origins, Health and Suicide of First Responders (2018). Available online at: https://
prevalence and severity of stress-related symptoms within a county police rudermanfoundation.org/white_papers/police-officers-and-firefighters-
force. Occup Med. (2003) 53:256–64. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqg061 aremore-likely-to-die-by-suicide-than-in-line-of-duty (accessed April 29,
5. Kop N, Euwema M. Burnout, job stress and violent behaviour 2020).
among Dutch police officers. Work Stress. (2010) 13:37–41. 19. Joseph PN, Violanti JM, Donahue R, Andrew ME, Trevisan M, Burchfiel
doi: 10.1080/02678379950019789 CM, et al. Police work and subclinical atherosclerosis. J Occup Environ Med.
6. Lipp M, Costa KR, Nunes V. Estresse, qualidade de vida e (2009) 51:700–7. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181a02252
estressores ocupacionais de policiais [Police stress, quality of life 20. Ramey SL, Downing NR, Franke WD. Milwaukee police department retirees.
and occupational stressors]. Psicol Org Trabalho. (2017) 17:46–53. AAOHN J. (2009) 57:448–53. doi: 10.3928/08910162-20091019-02
doi: 10.17652/rpot/2017.1.12490 21. Mccraty R, Atkinson M. Resilience training program reduces physiological
7. Wang Z, Inslicht SS, Metzler TJ, Henn-Haase C, McCaslin SE, Tong H, and psychological stress in police officers. Glob Adv Health Med. (2012)
et al. A prospective study of predictors of depression symptoms in police. 1:44–66. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2012.1.5.013
Psychiatry Res. (2010) 175:211–6. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.11.010 22. Correia, AR; Dunningham W. Estimativa da ocorrência de transtorno do
8. Violanti J, Mnatskanova A, Michael A, Tara H, Desta F, Penelope B, et al. estresse pós- traumático em policiais militares da Bahia [Estimate of the
Associations of stress, anxiety, and resiliency in police work. Occup Environ occurrence of post-traumatic stress disorder in military police from Bahia].
Med. (2014) 71(Suppl. 1):A3. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2014-102362.8 Rev Brasil Neurol Psiquiatria. (2016) 20:187–216.
9. McCarty WP, Skogan WG. Job-related burnout among civilian and sworn 23. Lipp M. Stress and quality of life of senior Brazilian police officers. Spanish J
police personnel. Police Q. (2013) 16:66–84. doi: 10.1177/1098611112457357 Psychol. (2009) 12:593–603. doi: 10.1017/S1138741600001967
10. Gershon RRM, Lin S, Li X. Work stress in aging police officers. J Occup 24. Gonçalves T, Silva B. Estresse, depressão e ansiedade: um enfoque sobre a
Environ Med. (2002) 44:160–7. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200202000-00011 saúde mental do policial militar [Stress, depression and anxiety: a focus on
11. Hartley TA, Violanti JM, Sarkisian K, Andrew ME, Burchfiel CM. PTSD mental health of military police] (Graduation thesis). Academia da Polícia
symptoms among police officers: associations with frequency, recency, and Militar de Goiás. Goiânia (2018).
types of traumatic events. Int J Emerg Mental Health. (2013) 15:241–53. 25. Coleta A. Fatores de estresse ocupacional e coping entre policiais civis
12. O’Hara AF, Violanti JM, Levenson RL, Clark RG. National police [Occupational stress factors and coing among civil police]. Psico USF. (2008)
suicide estimates: web surveillance study III. Int J Emerg Mental Health. 13:59–68. doi: 10.1590/S1413-82712008000100008
(2013) 15:31–8. 26. Coelho Alves JS, Bendassolli PF, Guedes Gondim SM. Emotional labor and
13. Berg AM, Hem E, Lau B, Ekeberg Ø. An exploration of job stress and health burnout: a study with the military police. Avances Psicol Lationamericana.
in the Norwegian police service: a cross sectional study. J Occup Med Toxicol. (2017) 35:459–72. doi: 10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/
(2006) 1:1–9. doi: 10.1186/1745-6673-1-26 a.4505
14. Hartley TA, Burchfiel CM, Fekedulegn D, Andrew ME, Violanti JM. Health 27. Mariano BD, Brambilla BB. Uma análise crítica sobre suicídio policial [A
disparities in police officers: comparisons to the U.S. general population. Int Critical Analysis on Police Suicide]. São Paulo: Ouvidoria da Polícia do Estado
J Emerg Mental Health. (2011) 13:211–20. de São Paulo (2019).
15. Bachmann S. Epidemiology of suicide and the psychiatric perspective. 28. Numbeo. Crime Index by Country 2020. (2020). Available online at: https://
Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2018) 15:1425. doi: 10.3390/ijerph150 www.numbeo.com/crime/rankings_by_country.jsp (accessed December 21,
71425 2020)
29. Bueno S, Lima RS. Brazillian 13th Public Security Annual Report. São Paulo 52. Khoury B, Lecomte T, Fortin G, Masse M, Therien P, Bouchard V, et al.
Observatório de Segurança Pública - OSP (2019). Mindfulness-based therapy: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Clin Psychol
30. Kurtz DL. Controlled burn. Feminist Criminol. (2008) 3:216–38. Rev. (2013) 33:763–71. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.05.005
doi: 10.1177/1557085108321672 53. Hofmann SG, Sawyer AT, Witt AA, Oh D. The effect of mindfulness-based
31. Covey TJ, Shucard JL, Violanti JM, Lee J, Shucard DW. The effects of therapy on anxiety and depression: a meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin
exposure to traumatic stressors on inhibitory control in police officers: a Psychol. (2010) 78:169–83. doi: 10.1037/a0018555
dense electrode array study using a Go/NoGo continuous performance task. 54. Luken M, Sammons A. Systematic review of mindfulness practice for
Int J Psychophysiol. (2013) 87:363–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.03.009 reducing job burnout. Am J Occup Ther. (2016) 70:7002250020p1–10.
32. Rajaratnam SMW, Barger LK, Lockley SW, Shea SA, Wang W, Landrigan doi: 10.5014/ajot.2016.016956
CP, et al. Sleep disorders, health, and safety in police officers. JAMA. (2011) 55. Demarzo MMP, Cuijpers P, Zabaleta-del-olmo E, Mahtani KR, Vellinga
306:2567–78. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1851 A, Vicens C. The efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions in
33. James L. The stability of implicit racial bias in police officers. Police Q. (2017) primary care: a meta-analytic review. Ann Fam Med. (2015) 13:573–82.
21:1–23. doi: 10.1177/1098611117732974 doi: 10.1370/afm.1863
34. Ma DS, Correll J, Wittenbrink B, Bar-anan Y, Sriram N, Nosek BA, et al. 56. Chiesa A, Serretti A. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for stress
When fatigue turns deadly : the association between fatigue and racial bias in management in healthy people: a review and meta-analysis. J Alternative
the decision to shoot. (2013) 35:515–24. doi: 10.1080/01973533.2013.840630 Complement Med. (2009) 15:593–600. doi: 10.1089/acm.2008.0495
35. Waggoner LB, Grant DA, Van Dongen HPA, Belenky G, Vila B. A 57. Vonderlin R, Biermann M, Bohus M, Lyssenko L. Mindfulness-based
combined field and laboratory design for assessing the impact of night shift programs in the workplace: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
work on police officer operational performance. Sleep. (2012) 35:1575–7. Mindfulness. (2020) 11:1579–98. doi: 10.1007/s12671-020-01328-3
doi: 10.5665/sleep.2214 58. Bijlsma T, Muis S, van Tilborg A. Mindfulness in the Dutch military train
36. Euwema MC. Occupational stress and the use of force by your brain. In: Rocha Á, Guarda T, editors. Developments and Advances in
Dutch police officers. Crim Justice Behav. (2015) 28:631–52. Defense and Security. Singapore: Springer (2018). p. 155–79.
doi: 10.1177/009385480102800505 59. Jha AP, Morrison AB, Parker SC, Stanley EA. Practice is protective:
37. Martinussen M, Richardsen AM, Burke RJ. Job demands, job resources, mindfulness training promotes cognitive resilience in high-stress cohorts.
and burnout among police officers. J Crim Justice. (2007) 35:239–49. Mindfulness. (2017) 8:46–58. doi: 10.1007/s12671-015-0465-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2007.03.001 60. Jha AP, Stanley EA, Kiyonaga A, Wong L, Gelfand L. Examining the
38. Alexander DA, Walker LG. A study of methods used by Scottish police protective effects of mindfulness training on working memory capacity and
officers to cope with work-induced stress. Stress Med. (1994) 10:131–8. affective experience. Emotion. (2010) 10:54–64. doi: 10.1037/a0018438
doi: 10.1002/smi.2460100210 61. Johnson DC, Thom NJ, Stanley EA, Haase L, Simmons AN, Shih PAB, et al.
39. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Modifying resilience mechanisms in atrisk individuals: a controlled study of
position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. (1995) mindfulness training in marines preparing for deployment. Am J Psychiatry.
41:1403–9. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00112-K (2014) 171:844–53. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.13040502
40. Alexopoulos EC, Palatsidi V, Tigani X, Darviri C. Exploring stress levels, job 62. Zimmermann F. Mindfulness-based practices as a resource for health and
satisfaction, and quality of life in a sample of police officers in Greece. Safety well-being. Med Acupuncture. (2015) 27:349–59. doi: 10.1089/acu.2014.1080
Health Work. (2014) 5:210–5. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2014.07.004 63. Irving JA, Dobkin PL, Park J. Cultivating mindfulness in health
41. Moreira-Almeida A, Neto FL, Koenig HG. Religiousness and care professionals: a review of empirical studies of mindfulness-based
mental health: a review. Rev Brasil Psiquiatria. (2006) 28:242–50. stress reduction (MBSR). Complement Ther Clin Prac. (2009) 15:61–6.
doi: 10.1590/S1516-44462006005000006 doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2009.01.002
42. Abdala GA, Kimura M, Koenig HG, Reinert KG, Horton K. Religiosity and 64. Kaplan JB, Bergman AL, Christopher M, Bowen S, Hunsinger M. Role of
quality of life in older adults: literature review. J Aging Phys Activity. (2014) resilience in mindfulness training for first responders. Mindfulness. (2017)
2:25–51. doi: 10.19141/2237-3756/lifestyle.v2.n2.p25-51 8:1373–80. doi: 10.1007/s12671-017-0713-2
43. Koenig HG, Büssing A. The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): 65. Meiklejohn J, Phillips C, Freedman ML, Griffin ML, Biegel G, Roach
a five-item measure for use in epidemological studies. Religions. (2010) A, et al. Integrating mindfulness training into K-12 education: fostering
1:78–85. doi: 10.3390/rel1010078 the resilience of teachers and students. Mindfulness. (2012) 3:291–307.
44. Sigler RT, Thweatt DR. Religiosity and stress for police officers. J Police Crim doi: 10.1007/s12671-012-0094-5
Psychol. (1997) 12:13–24. doi: 10.1007/BF02813807 66. Christopher MS, Goerling RJ, Rogers BS, Hunsinger M, Baron G, Bergman
45. Benefiel M, Fry LW, Geigle D. Advances in Workplace Spirituality: AL, et al. A pilot study evaluating the effectiveness of a mindfulness-
Theory, Research and Application. Charlotte, NC: IAP Information Age based intervention on cortisol awakening response and health outcomes
Publishing (2012). among law enforcement officers. J Police Crim Psychol. (2016) 31:15–28.
46. Segal Z V, Williams JMG, Teasdale JD. Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy doi: 10.1007/s11896-015-9161-x
for Depression: A New Approach to Preventing Relapse. New York, NY: 67. Christopher MS, Hunsinger M, Goerling LRJ, Bowen S, Rogers BS,
Guilford Press (2002). Gross CR, et al. Mindfulness-based resilience training to reduce health
47. Crane RS, Brewer J, Feldman C, Kabat-Zinn J, Santorelli S, Williams JMG, risk, stress reactivity, and aggression among law enforcement officers: a
et al. What defines mindfulness-based programs? The warp and the weft. feasibility and preliminary efficacy trial. Psychiatry Res. (2018) 264:104–15.
Psychol Med. (2016) 47:990–9. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716003317 doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.059
48. Neff KD. Development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. 68. Grupe DW, McGehee C, Smith C, Francis AD, Mumford JA, Davidson
Self Identity. (2003) 2:223–50. doi: 10.1080/15298860309027 RJ. Mindfulness training reduces PTSD symptoms and improves stress-
49. Hölzel BK, Lazar SW, Gard T, Schuman-Olivier Z, Vago DR, Ott U. How related health outcomes in police officers. J Police Crim Psychol. (2019) 1–14.
does mindfulness meditation work? Proposing mechanisms of action from doi: 10.31231/osf.io/jk4e6
a conceptual and neural perspective. Perspect Psychol Sci. (2011) 6:537–59. 69. Krick A, Felfe J. Who benefits from mindfulness? The moderating role
doi: 10.1177/1745691611419671 of personality and social norms for the effectiveness on psychological and
50. Schuman-Olivier Z, Trombka M, Lovas DA, Brewer JA, Vago DR, Gawande physiological outcomes among police officers. J Occup Health Psychol. (2020)
R, et al. Mindfulness and behavior change. Harvard Rev Psychiatry. (2020) 25:99–112. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000159
28:371–94. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000277 70. Jeste D V., Palmer BW, Rettew DC, Boardman S. Positive psychiatry: its time
51. Khoury B, Sharma M, Rush SE, Fournier C. Mindfulness-based stress has come. J Clin Psychiatry. (2015) 76:675–83. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14nr09599
reduction for healthy individuals: a meta-analysis. J Psychosomatic Res. 71. Peñalba V, McGuire H, Leite JR. Psychosocial interventions for prevention
(2015) 78:519–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.03.009 of psychological disorders in law enforcement officers. Cochrane
Database System Rev. (2008) 16:CD005601. doi: 10.1002/14651858. 91. Chakraborty H, Gu H. A Mixed Model Approach for Intent-to-Treat Analysis
CD005601.pub2 in Longitudinal Clinical Trials With Missing Values. Research Triangle Park:
72. Patterson GT, Chung IW, Swan PW. Stress management interventions for RTI Press (2009).
police officers and recruits: a meta-analysis. J Exp Criminol. (2014) 10:487– 92. Gueorguieva R, Krystal JH. Move over ANOVA: progress in analyzing
513. doi: 10.1007/s11292-014-9214-7 repeated-measures data and its reflection in papers published in the
73. Trombka M, Demarzo M, Bacas DC, Antonio SB, Cicuto K, Salvo V, archives of general psychiatry. Arch General Psychiatry. (2004) 61:310–7.
et al. Study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.3.310
mindfulness training to reduce burnout and promote quality of life 93. Salim A, Mackinnon A, Christensen H, Griffiths K. Comparison of
in police officers: the POLICE study. BMC Psychiatry. (2018) 18:1–9. data analysis strategies for intent-to-treat analysis in pre-test-post-test
doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1726-7 designs with substantial dropout rates. Psychiatry Res. (2008) 160:335–45.
74. Kraemer HC, Wilson GT, Fairburn CG, Agras WS. Mediators and doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.08.005
moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Arch General 94. Schielzeth H, Dingemanse NJ, Nakagawa S, Westneat DF, Allegue H,
Psychiatry. (2002) 59:877–83. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.59.10.877 Teplitsky C, et al. Robustness of linear mixed-effects models to violations
75. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining of distributional assumptions. Methods Ecol Evolut. (2020) 11:1141–52.
standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Internal Med. (2013) 158:200– doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13434
7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583 95. Liu X. Methods and Applications of Longitudinal Data Analysis. London:
76. Demarzo M, Garcia-Campayo J. Manual Prático de Mindfulness: Curiosidade Academic Press (2016).
e Aceitação [Mindfulness Practical Manual: Curiosity and Acceptance]. São 96. Schmolck B. Omitted Variable Tests and Dynamic Specification. Berlin:
Paulo: Pallas Athena (2015). Springer (2000).
77. Kabat-Zinn J. Full Catastrophe Living: Using the Wisdom of Your Body and 97. Schmider E, Ziegler M, Danay E, Beyer L, Bühner M. Is it really
Mind to Face Stress, Pain and Illness. New York, NY: Delacorte Press (1990). robust? Reinvestigating the robustness of ANOVA against violations
78. Dimeff L, Linehan MM. Dialectical behavior therapy in a nutshell. California of the normal distribution assumption. Methodology. (2010) 6:147–51.
Psychol. (2001) 34:10–3. doi: 10.1027/1614-2241/a000016
79. Luciano JV, Guallar JA, Aguado J, López-Del-Hoyo Y, Olivan B, Magallón 98. Mahoney AEJ, Mackenzie A, Williams AD, Smith J, Andrews G.
R, et al. Effectiveness of group acceptance and commitment therapy for Internet cognitive behavioural treatment for obsessive compulsive disorder:
fibromyalgia: a 6-month randomized controlled trial (EFFIGACT study). a randomised controlled trial. Behav Res Ther. (2014) 66:99–106.
Pain. (2014) 155:693–702. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.12.029 doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.09.012
80. Ciarrochi J, Kashdan TB. Mindfulness, Acceptance, and Positive Psychology. 99. Newby JM, Mewton L, Andrews G. Transdiagnostic versus disorder-
The Seven Foundations of Well-Being. Oakland, CA: The Context specific internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy for anxiety
Press (2013). and depression in primary care. J Anxiety Disord. (2017) 16:25–34.
81. Kuyken W, Hayes R, Barrett B, Byng R, Dalgleish T, Kessler D, et al. The doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.06.002
effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy 100. Botella J, Sanchez-Meca J. Meta-análisis en Ciencias Sociales y de la Salud.
compared with maintenance antidepressant treatment in the prevention Madrid: Síntesis (2015).
of depressive relapse/recurrence: results of a randomised controlled trial 101. Cumming G, Calin-Jageman. R. Introduction to the New Estatistics:
(The PREVENT study). Health Technol Assessment. (2015) 19:1–123. Estimation, Open Science, and Beyond. New York, NY: Routledge (2017).
doi: 10.3310/hta19730 102. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirekt
82. Cusens B, Duggan GB, Thorne K, Burch V. Evaluation of the breathworks effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Instruments Comput.
mindfulness-based pain management programme: effects on well-being and (2004) 36:717–31. doi: 10.3758/BF03206553
multiple measures of mindfulness. Clin Psychol Psychother. (2009) 17:1. 103. Fitzhugh H, Michaelides G, Anglia E, Connolly S, Anglia E, Daniels K, et
doi: 10.1002/cpp.653 al. Mindfulness in Policing. A Randomised Controlled Trial of Two Online
83. British Association for Mindfulness-Based Approaches. Good Practice Mindfulness Resources Across Five Forces in England and Wales. Coventry:
Guidance for Teachers. (2015). Available online at: https://bamba.org.uk/ UK College of Policing Report (2019).
(accessed April 26, 2020). 104. Vibe M, Bjørndal A, Tipton E, Hammerstrøm K. Mindfulness based
84. Brazilian Center for Mindfulness and Health Promotion. (2015). Available stress reduction (MBSR) for improving health, quality of life, and
online at: https://mindfulnessbrasil.com/formacao/formacao-modular/ social functioning in adults. Campbell Syst Rev. (2017) 13:1–264.
boas-praticas (accessed April 26, 2020). doi: 10.4073/csr.2017.11
85. Fleck MP, Louzada S, Xavier M, Chachamovich E, Vieira G, Santos L, et 105. Azad E. The effectiveness of mindfulness training in improving the quality
al. Application of the Portuguese version of the abbreviated instrument of life of the war victims with post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Iran J
of quality life WHOQOL-bref. Rev Saude Publica. (2000) 34:178–83. Psychiatry. (2014) 9:228–36.
doi: 10.1590/S0034-89102000000200012 106. Polusny MA, Erbes CR, Thuras P, Moran A, Lamberty GJ, Collins RC,
86. Botega NJ, Bio MR, Zomignani MA, Garcia C, Pereira WA. Mood et al. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for posttraumatic stress disorder
disorders among inpatients in ambulatory and validation of the anxiety among veterans: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. (2015) 314:456–65.
and depression scale HAD. Rev Saúde Pública. (1995) 29:355–63. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8361
doi: 10.1590/S0034-89101995000500004 107. Serpa JG, Taylor SL, Tillisch K. Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR)
87. Lucchetti G, Lucchetti ALG, Peres MF, Leão FC, Moreira-Almeida A, Koenig reduces anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation in veterans. Med Care.
HG. Validation of the Duke Religion Index: DUREL (Portuguese Version). J (2014) 52(12 Suppl. 5):S19–24. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000202
Religion Health. (2012) 51:579–86. doi: 10.1007/s10943-010-9429-5 108. Jasbi M, Sadeghi Bahmani D, Karami G, Omidbeygi M, Peyravi M, Panahi
88. Barros VV de, Kozasa EH, Souza ICW de, Ronzani TM. Validity evidence A, et al. Influence of adjuvant mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT)
of the Brazilian version of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). on symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in veterans-results
Psicologia. (2015) 28:87–95. doi: 10.1590/1678-7153.201528110 from a randomized control study. Cogn Behav Ther. (2018) 47:431–46.
89. Souza LK, Hutz CS. Adaptation of the Self-Compassion Scale for use in doi: 10.1080/16506073.2018.1445773
Brazil: evidences of construct validity. Temas Psicol. (2016) 24:159–72. 109. Kluepfel L, Ward T, Yehuda R, Dimoulas E, Smith A, Daly K.
doi: 10.9788/TP2016.1-11 The evaluation of mindfulness-based stress reduction for veterans
90. Zimpel RR, Panzini RG, Bandeira DR, Fleck MP, da Rocha NS. with mental health conditions. J Holistic Nurs. (2013) 31:248–55.
Psychometric properties of the whoqol-srpb bref, Brazilian Portuguese doi: 10.1177/0898010113495975
version. Brazil J Psychiatry. (2019) 41:411–8. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446- 110. Meland A, Ishimatsu K, Pensgaard AM, Wagstaff A, Fonne V, Garde AH, et
2018-0083 al. Impact of mindfulness training on physiological measures of stress and
objective measures of attention control in a military helicopter unit. Int J therapy in the treatment of recurrent major depressive disorder. Clin Psychol
Aviation Psychol. (2015) 25:191–208. doi: 10.1080/10508414.2015.1162639 Rev. (2015) 37:26–39. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.02.001
111. Solhaug I, de Vibe M, Friborg O, Sørlie T, Tyssen R, Bjørndal A, et al. Long- 130. Sevel LS, Finn MTM, Smith RM, Ryden AM, McKernan LC. Self-
term mental health effects of mindfulness training: a 4-year follow-up study. compassion in mindfulness-based stress reduction: an examination of
Mindfulness. (2019) 10:1661–72. doi: 10.1007/s12671-019-01100-2 prediction and mediation of intervention effects. Stress Health. (2020) 36:88–
112. Lo F, Arendt M, Ørnbøl E, Fink P, Mindfulness- WH. Mindfulness-based 96. doi: 10.1002/smi.2917
stress reduction and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy - a systematic 131. Campos D, Cebolla A, Quero S, Bretón-López J, Botella C, Soler J, et al.
review of randomized controlled trials. Acta Psychiatr Scand. (2011) 124:102– Meditation and happiness: mindfulness and self-compassion may mediate
19. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01704.x the meditation-happiness relationship. Personal Individual Differ. (2016)
113. Furukawa TA, Noma H, Caldwell DM, Honyashiki M, Shinohara K, Imai 93:80–5. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.08.040
H, et al. Waiting list may be a nocebo condition in psychotherapy trials: a 132. Sünbül ZA, Malkoç A. A mindful pathway to flourishing: mediating effects
contribution from network meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatrica Scand. (2014) of self-compassion and valued living in college students. Eur J Educ Stud.
130:181–92. doi: 10.1111/acps.12275 (2018) 5:174–85. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.140708
114. Demarzo MM, Andreoni S, Sanches N, Perez S, Fortes S G-CJ. Mindfulness- 133. Keng SL, Smoski MJ, Robins CJ, Ekblad AG, Brantley JG. Mechanisms
Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) in perceived stress and quality of life: an of change in mindfulness-based stress reduction: self-compassion and
open, uncontrolled study in a Brazilian healthy sample. Explore. (2014) mindfulness as mediators of intervention outcomes. J Cogn Psychother.
10:118–20. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2013.12.005 (2012) 26:270–80. doi: 10.1891/0889-8391.26.3.270
115. Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA. The World Health 134. Baer RA, Lykins ELB, Peters JR. Mindfulness and self-compassion
Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators
properties and results of the international field trial a Report and matched nonmeditators. J Positive Psychol. (2012) 7:230–8.
from the WHOQOL Group. Qual Life Res. (2004) 13:299–310. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2012.674548
doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00 135. Satici SA, Uysal R, Akin A. Investigating the relationship between flourishing
116. Hawthorne G, Herrman H, Murphy B. Interpreting the WHOQOL-Bref: and self-compassion:A structural equation modeling approach. Psychol
preliminary population norms and effect sizes. Social Indicat Res. (2006) Belgica. (2013) 53:85–99. doi: 10.5334/pb-53-4-85
77:37–59. doi: 10.1007/s11205-005-5552-1 136. Yang Y, Zhang M, Kou Y. Self-compassion and life satisfaction: the
117. Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital mediating role of hope. Personal Individual Differ. (2016) 98:91–5.
Anxiety and Depression Scale: an updated literature review. J Psychosomatic doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.086
Res. (2002) 52:69–77. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00296-3 137. Neff K, Kirkpatrick K, Rude S. Self-compassion and adaptive psychological
118. Couto G, Brito EDAG, Vasconcelos-Silva A, Lucchese R. Saúde mental functioning. J Res Personal. (2007) 41:139–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.03.004
do policial militar: Relações interpessoais e estresse no exercício 138. Arimitsu K, Hofmann SG. Cognitions as mediators in the relationship
profissional [Military police mental health: interpersonal relationships between self-compassion and affect. Personal Individual Differ. (2015) 74:41–
and stress in professional practice]. Psicol Argumento. (2017) 30:185–94. 8. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.008
doi: 10.7213/psicol.argum.5896 139. Krieger T, Holtforth MG. Self-compassion in depression : associations
119. Numbeo. Crime Index by City 2020. (2020). Available online at: https://www. with depressive symptoms, Rumination, and Avoidance in Depressed
numbeo.com/crime/rankings.jsp (accessed April 15, 2020). Outpatients. Behav Ther. (2013) 44:501–13. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.04.004
120. Carvalho AL, Cury AA, Garcia RC. Prevalence of bruxism and emotional 140. Leary MR, Tate EB, Adams CE, Allen AB, Hancock J. Self-compassion
stress and the association between them in Brazilian police officers. Brazilian and reactions to unpleasant self-relevant events : the implications
Oral Res. (2008) 22:31–5. doi: 10.1590/S1806-83242008000100006 of treating oneself kindly. J Pers Soc Psychol. (2007) 92:887–904.
121. Anchieta VCC, Galinkin AL. Policiais civis: representando a violência [civil doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.887
police officers: representing violence]. Psicol Sociedade. (2005) 17:29–37. 141. Neff K. Self-compassion: an alternative conceptualization of a
doi: 10.1590/S0102-71822005000100005 healthy attitude toward oneself. Self Identity. (2003) 2:85–101.
122. Garbarino S, Magnavita N, Elovainio M, Heponiemi T, Ciprani F, Cuomo G, doi: 10.1080/15298860309032
et al. Police job strain during routine activities and a major event. Occup Med. 142. Berking M, Meier C. Enhancing emotion-regulation skills in police officers
(2011) 61:395. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqr058 : results of a pilot controlled study. Behav Ther. (2010) 41:329–39.
123. Wallace BA, Shapiro SL. Mental balance and well-being: building bridges doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2009.08.001
between Buddhism and Western psychology. Am Psychol. (2006) 61:690– 143. Hayes SC, Strosahl K, Wilson KG, Bissett RT, Pistorello J, Toarmino D, et
701. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.690 al. Measuring experiential avoidance: a preliminary test of a working model.
124. Garland SN, Carlson LE, Cook S, Lansdell L, Speca M. A non-randomized Psychol Record. (2004) 54:553–78. doi: 10.1007/BF03395492
comparison of mindfulness-based stress reduction and healing arts programs 144. Amaranto E, Steinberg J, Castellano C, Mitchell R. Police
for facilitating post-traumatic growth and spirituality in cancer outpatients. stress interventions. Brief Treat Crisis Intervent. (2003) 3:47–53.
Support Care Cancer. (2007) 15:949–61. doi: 10.1007/s00520-007- doi: 10.1093/brief-treatment/mhg001
0280-5 145. Pogrebin MR, Poole ED. Emotion management: a study of police response to
125. Henderson VP, Clemow L, Massion AO, Hurley TG. The effects of tragic events. In: Flaherty MG, Ellis C, editors. Social Perspectives on Emotion.
mindfulness-based stress reduction on psychosocial outcomes and quality Greenwich, CT: Elsevier Science/JAI Press (1995). p. 149–68.
of life in early-stage breast cancer patients : a randomized trial. 146. Williams V, Ciarrochi J, Deane FP. On being mindful, emotionally aware,
Breast Cancer Res Treat. (2012) 131:99–109. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011- and more resilient: longitudinal pilot study of police recruits. Austral Psychol.
1738-1 (2010) 45:274–82. doi: 10.1080/00050060903573197
126. Crescentini C, Urgesi C, Campanella F, Eleopra R, Fabbro F. Effects of an 147. Chopko BA, Palmieri PA, Adams RE. Associations between police stress
8-week meditation program on the implicit and explicit attitudes toward and alcohol use: implications for practice. J Loss Trauma Int Perspect Stress
religious/spiritual self-representations. Conscious Cogn. (2014) 30:266–80. Coping. (2013) 18:482–97. doi: 10.1080/15325024.2012.719340
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.09.013 148. Komarovskaya I, Maguen S, Mccaslin SE, Metzler TJ, Madan A, Brown
127. IBGE Demographic Census (2010). Available online at: https://censo2010. AD, et al. The impact of killing and injuring others on mental health
ibge.gov.br/ (accessed April 24, 2020). symptoms among police officers. J Psychiatric Res. (2011) 45:1332–6.
128. Kuyken W, Watkins E, Holden E, White K, Taylor RS, Byford S, et al. How doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.05.004
does mindfulness-based cognitive therapy work? Behav Res Ther. (2010) 149. Kirschner H, Kuyken W, Wright K, Roberts H, Brejcha C, Karl A.
48:1105–12. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.08.003 Soothing your heart and feeling connected: a new experimental paradigm
129. Velden AM, Kuyken W, Wattar U, Crane C, Pallesen KJ, Dahlgaard J, et al. A to study the benefits of self-compassion. Clin Psychol Sci. (2019) 7:545–65.
systematic review of mechanisms of change in mindfulness-based cognitive doi: 10.1177/2167702618812438
150. Brito-Pons G, Campos D, Cebolla A. Implicit or explicit compassion? 162. Morone NE, Greco CM, Weiner DK. Mindfulness meditation for the
Effects of compassion cultivation training and comparison with treatment of chronic low back pain in older adults: a randomized controlled
mindfulness-based stress reduction. Mindfulness. (2018) 9:1494–508. pilot study. Pain. (2008) 134:310–9. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.04.038
doi: 10.1007/s12671-018-0898-z 163. Cunningham JA, Kypri K, McCambridge J. Exploratory randomized
151. Brown KW, Ryan RM. The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its controlled trial evaluating the impact of a waiting list control design. BMC
role in psychological well-being. J Personal Social Psychol. (2003) 84:822–48. Med Res Methodol. (2013) 13:150. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-150
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822 164. Verweij M. What is preventive medicine? Can Family Phys. (2000) 20:13–23.
152. Brownson C. Self-regulation: an “active ingredient” in the spirituality- doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-9365-6_2
health relationship (Indianapolis, IN: Undergraduate Honors Thesis 165. Hesketh R, Strang L, Pollitt A, Wilkinson B. What Do We Know About the
Collection) (2012). Effectiveness of Workplace Mental Health Interventions? London: The Policy
153. Aldwin CM, Park CL, Jeong YJ, Nath R. Differing pathways between Institute; King’s College London (2020).
religiousness, spirituality, and health: a self-regulation perspective. Psychol 166. Lueke A, Gibson B. Mindfulness meditation reduces implicit age and race
Religion Spiritual. (2014) 6:9–21. doi: 10.1037/a0034416 bias: the role of reduced automaticity of responding. Soc Psychol Personal
154. Prazak M, Critelli J, Martin L, Miranda V, Purdum M, Powers C. Mindfulness Sci. (2014) 6:1–8. doi: 10.1177/1948550614559651
and its role in physical and psychological health. Appl Psychol Health Well 167. Stell AJ, Farsides T. Brief loving-kindness meditation reduces racial bias,
Being. (2012) 4:91–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2011.01063.x mediated by positive other-regarding emotions. Motivation Emotion. (2015)
155. Musick MA, Traphagan JW, Koenig HG, Larson DB. Spirituality in physical 40:140–7. doi: 10.1007/s11031-015-9514-x
health and aging. J Adult Dev. (2000) 7:73–86. doi: 10.1023/A:1009523722920 168. Demarzo M, Cebolla A, Garcia-Campayo J. The implementation of
156. Lawler-Row KA, Elliott J. The role of religious activity and spirituality in mindfulness in healthcare systems: a theoretical analysis. General Hospital
the health and well-being of older adults. J Health Psychol. (2009) 14:43–52. Psychiatry. (2015) 37:166–71. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.11.013
doi: 10.1177/1359105308097944 169. Neff K, Germer C. The Mindful Self-Compassion Workbook: A Proven Way
157. Charles GL, Travis F, Smith J. Policing and spirituality: their impact on to Accept Yourself, Build Inner Strength, and Thrive. New York, NY: Guilford
brain integration and consciousness. J Manage Spiritual Religion. (2014) Publications (2018).
11:230–44. doi: 10.1080/14766086.2014.887479 170. Goldin PR, Jazaieri H. The Compassion Cultivation Training (CCT) Program.
158. Bergman AL, Christopher MS, Bowen S. Changes in facets of mindfulness The Oxford Handbook of Compassion Science New York, NY (2017).
predict stress and anger outcomes for police officers. Mindfulness. (2016)
7:851–8. doi: 10.1007/s12671-016-0522-z Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not
159. Alsubaie M, Abbott R, Dunn B, Dickens C, Keil TF, Henley W, et al. necessarily reflect the position or policy of the funders.
Mechanisms of action in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) and
mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) in people with physical and/or Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the
psychological conditions: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. (2017) absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a
55:74–91. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.04.008 potential conflict of interest.
160. Carmody J, Baer RA. How long does a mindfulness-based stress
reduction program need to be? A review of class contact hours and Copyright © 2021 Trombka, Demarzo, Campos, Antonio, Cicuto, Walcher, García-
effect sizes for psychological distress. J Clin Psychol. (2009) 65:627–38. Campayo, Schuman-Olivier and Rocha. This is an open-access article distributed
doi: 10.1002/jclp.20555 under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use,
161. Demarzo M, Montero-Marin J, Puebla-Guedea M, Navarro-Gil M, Herrera- distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original
Mercadal P, Moreno-González S, et al. Efficacy of 8- and 4-session author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication
mindfulness-based interventions in a non-clinical population: a controlled in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use,
study. Front Psychol. (2017) 8:1343. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01343 distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.