Architecture
Architecture
01
General Data
01317 association & professional organization
01319 reference books & publications
01346 computer software / hardware
01542 construction cranes, elevators & hoists
01544 construction scaffolding & platforms
01548 construction tools
GENERAL DATA
01
01
PALA
PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
DATE FOUNDED
Groundwork for the organization of the Philippine Association of
EFREN A. AURELIO Landscape Architects was laid sometime in 1964 by the four LA's,
President namely Dolly Q. Perez, Ildefonso P. Santos, Jesse M. Sison and
Anselmo Alquinto. Due to lack of membership, it remained
dormant until 1968 when the same group made an effort to expand
ELIZABETH H. ESPINO
01317 association & professional organization
PRESIDENT DIRECTORS
JUSTO E. MANALO
J.E. Manalo & Co., Inc. RAMON F. ALLADO IBARRA B. ORTIZ
Bernal St. cor. C. Raymundo Ave. Davao Constructors Association Macortiz Engineering, Inc.
Rosario, Pasig City Center, Inc. 1407 Quezon Ave., Quezon City
Tel. No. 641-2796 to 98 733 Lapu-lapu St., Davao City Tel. Nos.: 373-3280/373-7377
Fax No. 641-4850 Tel. Nos.: (082) 222-5859/234-1625 Faz Nos.: 373-7375/373-3276
Email: [email protected] Fax No.: (082) 222-5859
(Manila Office)
IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT
2ND VICE-PRESIDENT
Tel. Nos.: 820-7571/820-7594/7576 DANNY F. PAYUYO
Fax No.: 820-7562 Svendala Philippines Inc.
EMILIO J. TUMBOCON PCPD Cmpd. Pasong Tamo Ext.
Makati Development Corporation Taguig, Metro Manila
10-11th Flrs., Ayala Life-FGU Center PERICLES P. DAKAY Tel. Nos.: 840-1168/843-7061 to 72
Madrigal Bus. Park, Acacia Avenue Cebu Contractors Association loc. 204 & 206
Alabang, Muntinlupa City c/o Dakay Construction Fax No.: 843-8992
Tel. Nos.: 807-8555 to 97 Woolbride Drive, Sudlon, Lahug, Email: [email protected]
Fax Nos.: 807-7936 / 807-6206 Cebu City
Email: Tel. No. (032) 255-7114
[email protected] Fax No. (032) 254-0655 CORPORATE SECRETARY/
LEGAL COUNSEL
SECRETARY ATTY. MA. ELENA GO FRANCISCO
ROSARIO R. EVANGELISTA ERIC DELA ROSA FRANCISCO MANLAPAZ &
Kanlaon Construction Inc. Equitable Machines Inc. QUISUMBING LAW OFFICES
3/F, 304-305 Prestige Tower 146 Shaw Blvd. Ext. Pasig City W2404-A, 24/F WEST TOWER
Emerald Ave., Ortigas Center, Tel Nos.: 671-0817/671-0815 PSE Centre, Exchange Rd.
Pasig City Fax No.: 671-0783 Ortigas Center, Pasig City
Tel. Nos.: 636-5200 Email: [email protected] Tel. Nos.: 636-8128/636-8129
Fax No.: 638-5281
DIRECTORS:
The PIA Center, 65 East Capitol Drive, Brgy. Kapitolyo, Pasig City, Philippines
PO Box 13890 Ortigas Center Post Office
Tel. Nos.: (0632)634-1762/63 Telefax : (0632)634-2512
E-mail: [email protected] Website: piaarchitects.com
THE PHILIPPINE INSTITUTE OF INTERIOR DESIGNERS
01
THE ACCREDITED PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR INTERIOR DESIGNERS
Member: APSDA and IFI
Ruben A. SY
Secretary
Ex-Officio Director
Eustaquio T. Coronel, Jr. Efren H. Sison, IPP
Treasurer
Council of Advisers
Rogelio R. Hamak (Past Presidents)
Business Manager Bashir D. Rasuman
Mariano E. Raner III Felipe F. Cruz
P.R.O. Vicente B. Lopez
Nelson Q. Irasga
Peter L. Dy Antonio A. Manbueto
Auditor Romulo M. Del Rosario
David M. Consunji
Primitivo C. Cal, Ph.D. Juanito N. Ferrer
National Consultant and Legal Council Aber P. Canlas
Angel L. Lazaro III, Ph.D.
Nannette C. Villanueva Jesus R. Hipolito
National Administrative Officer Ramon G. Hechanova
Affiliate Societies:
01
Folk Arts Theater, CCP Complex, Roxas Blvd. Manila
Manuel A. Guanzon, FUAP In the 1960's the need for an official voice for architects in this
VP for Area C country brought together the PIA, LPA and APGA in various
experimentation of organizational format towards a unified
Leopoldo Sandoval, UAP organization. So that, in 1973, when the PD 223 was passed
VP for Area D which created a Professional Regulation Commission (PRC)
mandated to accredit for each profession only one
Manuel L. Fernando, UAP representative professional association, these three
Secretary General
architectural professional organizations were already
pre-disposed to unification.
Ana M. Ling, FUAP
Treasurer
A Resolution of the joint boards of the PIA, the LPA and the
Omar Maxwell Espina, UAP APGA, on December 10, 1973 to implement the common desire
Auditor to integrate the three organizations into one body was ratified in
a joint general meeting of the three organizations on December
16, 1973 at the Architectural Center at Ayala Avenue, Makati.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS
By June 30, 1974, the task of the 15-man ad hoc commision
Josefina M. Ramos, FUAP
CommissiononProfessionalPractice
that laid the groundwork for the final integration of the three
organizations was completed.
Christopher P. Espina, FUAP
CommissiononEducation On December 12, 1974, the constitution and by-laws of the
Edilberto F. Florentino, FUAP United Architects of the Philippines was approved by the joint
CommissiononGovernmentandExternalAffairs boards of PIA, the LPA and APGA. An interim board was thereby
created to perform transitory activities for the integration until the
Ma. Lisa V. Santos, FUAP
CommissiononInernalAffairs
formal election of the first Board of Directors of the new union.
Ma. Christina V. Turalba, FUAP On May 12, 1975, Certificate of Accreditation Number 001 was
CenterforFilipinoArchitecture issued by the Professional Regulation Commission to the United
Honrado R. Fernandez, FUAP Architects of the Philippines for having satisfactorily complied
ProfessionalDevelopmentCenter with all the requirements for accreditation making it the first
professional organization to be granted the certificate by the PRC.
Fernando L. Santos, FUAP
CommissiononConventions&Conferences
December 12, 1975 marked the election of the first Board of
Directors of the UAP. The LPA and the APGA, following the true
spirit of integration ceased all their activities hence.
DISTRICT DIRECTORS Finally, on October 19, 1978, 26 past presidents and fellows of
the PIA formulated and signed a resolution expressing full
Rossano G. Baradi, UAP Benjamin T. Jimenez, UAP Nestor I. Liston, UAP support to the UAP.
District Director, A-1 District Director, B-1 RD, C-1
Robert Benedicto C. Hormoso, UAP Eric P. Salimbagat, UAP Margarita B. Maestro, UAP
District Director, A-2 District Director, B-2 RD, C-2
Today, year 2000, with 10,636 registered members, the UAP
Armand Dave A. Commandante, UAP Miguel C. Guerrero III, UAP Michael T. Ang, UAP continues to grow and to promote the highest standards of
District Director, A-3 District Director, B-3 RD, D-1 ethical conduct and excellence in the practice and service of the
Virgilio D. Andres Jr., UAP Francisco A. Coll, UAP Wilfredo D. Sagusay, UAP
District Director, A-4 District Director, B-4 RD, D-3 profession by uplifting the quality of architectural education,
Noralita C. Dumlao, UAP Oscar P. Fernandez, UAP research and development to live up to its status of the truly
District Director, A-5 District Director, B-5 integrated organization of registered architects in the philippines.
Adopting CAD Standards
01
Are there any CAD managers out there who can honestly AutoCAD session to utilize standard templates that you cleverly store on a network
drive. The main selling point for template files (besides standardization) is that they save
say they really control CAD standards to perfection? labor because starting a drawing session is as easy as picking the right template. Your
users won’t have to wrestle with setting up drawing parameters, which they should very
The fact seems to be that every time we try to implement CAD standards, there is always much appreciate.
some psychological or political glitch that keeps us from finding Nirvana. A frequent
comment is that CAD standards are easy enough to come up with but hard to enforce. Design Procedures. Of course AutoCAD has a substantial amount of customization
Sometimes we have to deal with users who won’t follow the plan, and we are frustrated power such as AutoLISP, VBA or VB applications that can be used to perform design
with our upper management for not enforcing the rules or helping set a tone of tasks or calculations. The use of these types of custom utilities should also be
compliance. standardized and verified by some testing. So rather than having some users using
customized programs and others doing it the old manual way, standardize to reduce labor
Let’s examine CAD standards from the perspective of what you can standardize, and costs and increase the standardization.
why it makes financial sense to do so. Let’s face it, the upper management really doesn’t
understand what CAD standards entail, so you shouldn’t be surprised that they don’t
grasp the inherent value of them. You’ll be amazed that when you present CAD
standards as a key financial contributor to your company’s bottom line, upper Why All This?
management’s ears will perk up.
Now that you’ve defined what you want to standardize, your upper management may ask
questions such as “What’s the payoff?” or “Why should we invest time?” with respect
to CAD standards. Remember that upper management is looking for a return-on-investment
What to Standardize? potential before they undertake any effort that redefines work practices. If you can’t
demonstrate why CAD standards will pay back, you can bet you’ll have no real support
Before we talk about how and why you hope to standardize your environments, you need from upper, project or engineering management.
to show what should be standardized. This may seem obvious to CAD managers, but to
upper management, it can be confusing. So as part of your mission to communicate your The reason I go out of my way to outline how you gain upper management’s buy-in is to
CAD needs to upper management, take extra care to explain what you’re trying to be sure that you’ll have the political support required if users decide not to follow the
accomplish. Following are some of the areas to focus on. standards. You’ll need an enforcement mechanism to bring the renegades in line. There is
nothing as powerful as upper management supporting your CAD standards because they
Layering/Plotting. A layering system can be as easy as just a few layers for simple see a clear financial benefit in doing so. Be sure to line up your support with upper
machine parts to a complex system for massive building projects. The point isn’t how management by highlighting the financial advantages associated with CAD standards.
many layers you have but that the layers you do have are standardized. Setting layer The key will be to show how CAD standards can reduce errors and rework. Try a few of
standards is as easy as saying that machined parts shall be placed on the OBJECT layer or the following examples to flesh out your argument.
that non-load bearing walls shall be placed on the AR-WALLS layer, for example. The list
of layers you standardize should encompass all the design elements needed for your - Plotting Fiascos. Bring up an example of how plotting various sets of drawings
project, and they should also include parameters for default colors, linetypes, plot styles took hours rather than minutes because layering and/or plotting standards weren’t in
and lineweights to achieve maximum standardization. Always remember that layering place during the creation of drawing sets. Project managers are especially sensitive to this
controls colors (usually) and therefore plotting. In a very real way your plotting argument because they’ve been burned by it before. Placing a dollar value on plotting
standards are controlled based on how well you control layers, so be specific! problems is easy; just take a conservative estimate of wasted hours and multiply by your
average hourly labor cost to get a valid cost number. Reducing this cost can be a key
Text. Text styles in AutoCAD (which include the font) should be standardized to driver in the move to CAD standards, so be sure to use it.
achieve a consistent look and feel across all drawings in an organization. You may need
several text styles/fonts for plain text, titles and so on. Specifying a text style should - Temporary Labor Problems. How long does it take you to get a new temporary
include all required parameters such as “the default text style shall be called STANDARD
CAD technician up to speed on your drawing practices? How much does it cost in lost
and shall use a text font of arial.ttf with a default height of 0, width of 1 and all special productivity for your company? Wouldn’t a firm set of CAD standards cut through all this
effects such as upside down, backwards and so forth set to off.” Note how everything is uncertainty? By the way, you’ll hire better temporary labor if you let them perform a
specified to achieve maximum standardization and therefore minimum surprises. drawing test working to your standard because you’ll verify their knowledge of layers,
text and dimensioning. Right? You can demonstrate costs in this area by taking the
Dimension Styles. Along with text styles, dimension styles control the appearance number of training hours it takes to orient a new employee times the labor rate times the
of CAD drawings and adherence to industry standards such as ANSI, ISO, DIN or JIS number of new employees in a given year. If you make use of temporary labor, you may be
format dimensions. Dimension styles also present a lot of room for play and inconsistency able to justify CAD standardization on this cost savings alone. Automation Possibili-
on the user’s part. With no dimension-style standards, you can easily have a dimension- ties. What manual processes in your company (such as plotting) could you automate if
ing mess on your hands. your CAD standards made all your drawings perfectly consistent? This is a powerful
argument with upper management because automating mundane processes allows their
Dimension Scaling Standards. Depending on your design environment, you employees to do higher quality work (and more of it.) If you frame CAD standards as the
might dimension in Model Space using DIMSCALE settings to achieve proper scaling, or doorway to productivity gains, you’ll get upper management’s undivided attention.
you might use Paper Space to generate non-associative dimensions. The key is to control
the process and gain consistency. For DIMSCALE environments, publish standards such
- Inconsistent Look and Feel. Most CAD managers can produce several different
as, “for drawings with scale 1=8 the DIMSCALE shall be set to 8” or “for drawings with
sets of drawings done by different vendors, engineers and drafters that don’t look
scale ?”=1' the DIMSCALE shall be set to 48" to avoid any uncertainty. AutoCAD
anything at all alike. If you throw three drawings on a conference table in front of project/
DIMSCALE errors can be disastrous, as can DIMVARS. Don’t get stuck fixing drawings
engineering management confronting them with this reality, they’ll see that standardiza-
because these procedures weren’t specified.
tion would produce a more uniform look for the company’s drawing product. Placing a
dollar value on the look and feel issue is tough, but the psychology of it is a powerful
Title Blocks. Also known as the good old drawing border, Title Blocks are the motivator.
digital equivalent of your company’s drafting letterhead. A proper title block will be
constructed to plot properly based on your plotting device’s margin values, and it
should ideally be annotated using attributes to allow for automated data extraction to
external databases. Of course your title blocks should use your standard text styles (see Vendor Management
previous section) and present any standard notes or disclaimers your company normally
uses. You can also use AutoCAD’s hyperlinking capability to put a hook to your
If your company outsources any design tasks to vendors, you probably receive electronic
drawings from them at some time. The problem typically is that different vendors’
company’s Web site in the title block for extra credit points!
drawings look nothing at all like your drawings. CAD standards can be a great work
saver if you require your vendors to follow your standards. After all, why rework vendor
Paper Space/Layouts. Assuming you use AutoCAD, you can make standards for
drawings to conform to your standards after the fact?
the new AutoCAD 2000 layout tabs and control which objects are drawn in Model Space
versus which objects are placed in Paper Space. Pay special attention when specifying
where dimensions are created. Otherwise you can have tremendous inconsistency in
Summing Up
CAD
associative dimensioning practices, which can cost a substantial amount of time to correct
later.
It is my hope that these ideas about how to implement CAD standards resonate with you
Template Files. The template file is simply a drawing file saved to a template format and provide some insights into how to make a strong case for standardization. By using
that contains all the layers, text styles, dimension styles, layouts, title blocks and default the language presented in this column when talking to your upper management, you
drawing elements already defined. You can use the template control when starting a new should find them much more responsive to your ideas.
01
01346 computer software / hardware
HP DesignJet 5000/5000PS printers
Production speed delivering ultimate photo and line quality with
high unattendedness and output that is up to 60 inches (152 cm) wide.
With our highly trained Technical Support Engineers, we now offer the most compre-
hensive service and support programs providing you unprecedented confidence unmatched in
the industry.
notes:
01
Can’t find your company?
Contact us and let us
know more about your
01 email us @
product.
01317 association & professional organization 01319 reference books & publications
Architectural Center Club, Inc. Makati 890-9227 Archikonst Magazine QC 922-0414
Association of Construction Equipment Lessors, Inc. Pasig 631-3136 BluPrint Magazine Pasig 633-0651
Association of Wire Corp. of The Phils. Pasig 645-0957 Design and Architecture Magazine Mand. 531-4831
Center for International Trade Expo Manila 831-2382 Home Ideas QC 924-7510
Ceramic Industrial Manufacturers of The Phils. KC 361-6128 Hinge Phils., Inc. Makati 813-6935
01 email us @
product.
Bormaheco Inc. Makati 897-0932 Ridge Tool Company (Ridgid) Makati 816-0206
CBBE Incorporated Manila 564-0229 Robert Bosch Inc. Makati 817-3231
Equipment Engineers, Inc. QC 635-0851 - 56 Sandvik Philippines, Inc. Munt. 807-6372
Guzent Inc. QC 363-7541 Solanda Ventures Inc. (LG) Manila 527-8261
Maxwell Heavy Equipment Corp. QC 714-2012 Spirax Ent. (ITW Ramset/Red Head) Manila 711-1556
mhe Dematic Inc. Pque 822-2536 Transpo Sales Inc. (Dynabrade) QC 740-7904
MOF Company (Subic) Inc. PC 832-3018 Universal Sales Corp. (Universal IKS Klingelnberg) Makati 816-7574
Pacific Orient Wind Corp. Makati 843-6351 Vic’s Construction Supply Manila 241-3571
Pan Oriental Industries Corp. Makati 751-8255 Vicson Multi-Industrial Product Co. Manila 243-0382
Ravago Equipment Rentals, Inc. KC 287-5190
SCAFF Systems Manufacturer Inc. QC 911-1808 St. Patrick commercial, Inc. QC 911-0033
Scaffold Tech. Services Corporation Mand. 535-2461/65 Upshaw Industrial Corp. (Radiodetection) SJ 721-5451
Scaff Works Inc. QC 711-4644
Stage Master Resources Inc. QC 928-3226