Untitled
Untitled
Untitled
is booming. The Louvre’s web traffic has increased tenfold to four hundred thousand
visits a day, and New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art reports an elevenfold
uptick in visits to #MetKids, its youth education initiative.
This forced quantum leap into virtual visitorship intersects powerfully with young
people’s preferred technologies, enabling them to participate more prolifically and
publicly in museum programming than ever before. As a result, I argue, a new
critical children’s museology is emerging at the forefront of virtual museological
practice. As I define it, children’s museology refers to the production of museum
content and programming not just for or about children, but also by and with
children in ways that engage them as valued social actors and knowledge-bearers.
Similarly, while much has been written about the importance of museums for
children, the reverse is also true: children are important for museums of all
kinds. They are one of the main motivations behind family visits to these safe,
typically spacious sites of learning and wonder, and museums should welcome and
value their youngest visitors if they wish to remain popular destinations. School
groups make up a varying but significant portion of most museums’ annual
visitorship, and, when facilitated well, can lay important groundwork for
cultivating a lifelong love of museums in future adults. Moreover, museums that
successfully cater to children’s needs and interests are often more relevant,
successful, engaging, and accessible to adults as well. As Hindley, Raso, and
McGettigan explain in another post on this blog, “By serving young audiences,
museums also stand to better serve their communities and create more robust
experiences for visitors of all ages.”
A child’s self-curated exhibition for the National Museums of Liverpool’s “My Home
is My Museum” initiative. Photo credit: Courtesy of National Museums of Liverpool
Skip over related stories to continue reading article
Related Stories
While these online materials for children are vast, they largely offer activities
and resources for children, designed by adults. This approach is certainly not
without value, but it reproduces a traditional top-down approach of interacting
with children, a power dynamic in which adults hold most of the authority and set
the terms of engagement. It misses an opportunity to explore content and
programming by and with children, who may have unique contributions to make drawing
from their own expertise, capabilities, and capacity for creativity and innovation.
This is where a new critical children’s museology comes in. Grounded in a child-
centered approach, it stands to offer a more critical component to contemporary
museological practice, in at least two senses of the word: critical as in grounded
in critique of the adult-dominated status quo, but also critical as in crucial to
engaging with children as valued social actors and knowledge-bearers.
A few powerful models that provide more space for children to exert their own
agency are worth noting. Diverging from traditional adult-created coloring pages,
the Museo Universitario de Arte Contemporáneo in Mexico City recently posted an
open call for children’s black-and-white drawings to be compiled in a free, online
coloring book that can be downloaded and printed. Hosted by the Museum of
Contemporary Art Chicago, Wisdom Baty’s “Like Me! A Culturally Relevant
Contemporary Art History Workbook for Children” prompts elementary schoolchildren
to record their own interpretations of art from the collection in ways that reflect
their individual and cultural identities and experiences. Responding to the crisis
of ongoing anti-Black violence and racism in the US and the world, the Sugar Hill
Children’s Museum of Art and Storytelling in Manhattan is hosting a virtual
“Children’s Art Exhibition for Justice” to commemorate one of the earliest civil
rights marches, the Silent Protest Parade of 1917. And the National Museums of
Liverpool’s “My Home is My Museum” initiative invited children between four and
eleven years of age to curate exhibits from their personal collections of objects
and artwork at home that represent their lives, and submit their exhibit title,
curatorial statement, poster, and promotional video online.
Some strong models do exist. For example, the Niagara-on-the-Lake Museum has
launched a guided journaling initiative for kids quarantined at home in the form of
free, printable workbooks. The books are designed to provide an inspiring outlet
for young people to document their feelings and experiences in the form of
illustrations, comics, memes, poems, lists, scrapbooks, and short essays that can
later be submitted to the museum’s archives. Prompts include specific questions
about everyday life, special events, challenges, hopes, fears, family life, school,
friendship, and understandings of the pandemic and its repercussions. The Huron
County Museum is also actively collecting children’s reflections on their
experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic and its effects on the lives of those living
in Huron County. A third model may be found in the Seattle Art Museum’s support of
their Teen Arts Group designed to “cultivate the voice and leadership of diverse
young people who share their passion for the power of art to build community.” The
youth created their own online zine titled “Peering Through the Looking Glass:
Youth Artists Connect and Reflect on COVID-19,” which contains provocative artwork
representing their perspectives on and experiences of recent changes brought about
by the virus. The zine has been showcased on the museum’s website, where it is
available to all in digital form.
Also, we must remember these recent initiatives best serve those with high quality
online access, and real disparities perdure in cyberspace. Though it is beyond the
scope of this post, we need to learn more about who is—and isn’t—able to access
museums’ online content if we care about inclusive participation.