1.1 Lesson
1.1 Lesson
1.1 Lesson
To understand each Environmental Value System and how they would approach any
environmental issue.
Introduction: Development
of the Modern
Environmental Movement
Contrasting EVS’s
Plenary
The environmental movement began to take shape in the latter part of the 20th
century, advocating sustainable development through changes in public policy and
individual behaviour.
Environmental DISASTERS Page 224 ESS Essentials
1956 - Minamata disease (Japan)
● linked to the release of methyl mercury into the wastewater
● produced by the Chisso Corporation’s chemical factory
● mercury contaminated fish/shellfish along the coast and was then eaten by the
local populations, whose diet consisted heavily of locally caught seafood.
● Caused neurological damage: to hearing, speech, and vision, and muscle
weakness, as well as death and birth defects.
1987 - The Montreal Protocol was adopted to control ozone depleting substances (ODS’s).
1997 - The Kyoto Protocol controls CO2 emissions.
The Treaty on Persistent Organic Pollutants or POPs was introduced, and so the list continues.
International agreements Chegg, Environmental Science
14th Edition page 7-10
● Education
● Cultural ● Perspectives
influences ● Decisions on
● Economic factors how to act
EVS
● Socio-political regarding
factors (Ex. environmental
communism, issues
capitalism) ● Action.
● Religious
texts/doctrine
Nature centred: integrates social, spiritual, and
Range of EVS’s
environmental dimensions into a holistic ideal. It puts
ecology and nature as central to humanity and
emphasises a less materialistic approach to life with
greater self-sufficiency
ECOCENTRISM
ENVIRONMENTAL VALUE
-believe small-scale, local and individual actions, such as recycling, can make a
difference
Environmental managers
Guinness and Walpole,
Environmental Systems and
Societies 2nd Edition
1. Belief that economic growth and resource exploitation can continue assuming.
a. Suitable economic adjustments to taxes, fees, etc.
b. Improvements in the legal rights to a minimum level of environmental quality
c. Compensation arrangements satisfactory to those who experience adverse environmental and/or
social effects.
2. Acceptance of new project appraisal techniques and decision review arrangements
to allow for wider discussion or genuine search for consensus among representative
groups of interested parties.
Ex. see the world in terms analogous to a garden which needs care and attention or
‘stewardship’. They hold that legislation is needed to protect the environment and that if
an environment is damaged, those who suffer should receive compensation. They
believe that if humans take care of the Earth, it will take care of them.
Deep ecologists
Guinness and Walpole, Environmental Systems and
Societies 2nd Edition
-value nature over humanity and believe that all species and
ecosystems have values and rights that humans should not interfere
with.
-They believe that the human population should decrease so that
humans consume less of the Earth’s resources.
The Kalahari Bushmen
The Kalahari Bushmen are a nomadic people living in the Kalahari
Desert in Botswana and Namibia. Characteristics that make them
ecocentric include the following:
1. Belief that man can always find a way out of any difficulties, either political,
scientific or technological
2. Acceptance than pro-growth goals define the rationality of project appraisal and
policy formation
3. Optimism about the ability of man to improve the lot of the world’s people.
4. Faith that scientific and technological expertise provides the basic foundation for
advice on matters pertaining to economic growth, public health and safety.
5. Suspicion of attempts to widen basis for participation and lengthy discussion in
project appraisal and policy review.
DECISION MAKING
and ecocentric solutions to the
following problems: