The Ultimate Investing Cheat Sheet: A Checklist For Picking Great Stocks
The Ultimate Investing Cheat Sheet: A Checklist For Picking Great Stocks
“The investor’s chief problem - and even their worst enemy is likely to be
themself” - Ben Graham
SERIOUSLY…
UC Davis professor Brad Barber studied the buy and sell
recommendations of Wall Street analysts.
It can provide higher returns, lower risk, reduced stress, and greatly decrease the time it takes to
build a portfolio.
It is the modern way to construct a portfolio.
Here’s some example strategies
Dividend, Size strategy
Dividend
THE GROWTH CHECKLIST
🮮 Earnings Yield > 12%
🮮 EBIT Yield > 12%
🮮 # Of Years Where Earnings Growth <2X Federal Bond Yield < 2
🮮 FCF Yield > 10%
🮮 Forward P/E / Trailing P/E > 1.1
🮮 Operating Cash Flow > EPS
🮮 # Of Years With Declining EPS < 2
🮮 Current EPS / EPS 10yrs ago > 3.0
🮮 Earnings Misses in the Last 24 Months = 0
Growth
THE RATINGS CHECKLIST
🮮 Altman Z-score >= 3.5
🮮 Piotroski F-score >= 7.0
🮮 Beneish M-score < -3.0
Ratings
THE TECHNICALS CHECKLIST
🮮 Positive 1-month price momentum
🮮 Positive 3-month price momentum
🮮 Positive 6-month price momentum
🮮 SMA 50 > SMA 200
🮮 EMA 12 > EMA 26
🮮 RSI < 30
🮮 Positive HMA
Technicals
THE MANAGEMENT CHECKLIST
🮮 Management shareholding > 10%
🮮 Management have bought more shares than were sold in last 3 months
🮮 Management Compensation growth rate < Revenue Growth Rate
Management
THE IMPACT CHECKLIST
🮮 CDP Climate Score = A
🮮 Total ESG Risk Score > BB
🮮 Beneish M-score < -3.0
Impact
THE PERFORMANCE CHECKLIST
Look at the last 10 years of data, year over year and make sure there is low volatility and high growth for:
🮮 Sales
🮮 Earnings
🮮 Book value
🮮 Free cash flow
🮮 dividends
🮮 Return on equity
🮮 Current ratio
🮮 Debt / equity (declining)
🮮 Net margin (declining)
🮮 Inventory turnover Impact
QUESTIONS
Stay away from qualitative judgement as much as you can. But if you must:
eg. $10,000
Step 2
Choose Your
Market(s)
● Countries
● Industries
eg. Micro-cap
Step 4
Value Efficiency Health
Filter Based On
The Checklists
Dividend Growth Technical
Step 5
Value
Rank The Filtered Efficiency Health
Companies
Dividend Growth Technical
*S&P500 returned $1M @ 8.79% per annum during this same period.
Backtested returns. Past performance is not indicative of future results
REBALANCING
In order to keep your portfolio up to date, you will need to buy and sell
some stocks each month (this can alternatively be done each year).
Value
NOTES ON VALUE
Value is the most famous investing factor. It has long been known about, since the ground-breaking
work by Benjamin Graham showing that undervalued companies perform better in the long-run. It
was truly made famous as a factor by legendary investor Warren Buffett.
Value is an excellent factor.
Fig 1. The performance of P/E (Value) since 1965. The universe of stocks is split into deciles by
Price-to-earnings. The lowest P/E ratio to the highest P/E ratio. The portfolio was rebalanced each year
to keep it up to date. We can see that the decile with the lowest P/E returned an average of ~16% per
year, whilst the highest P/E returned an average of ~5% per year.
Efficiency
NOTES ON QUALITY
Warren Buffett also looks for high quality and efficient companies. Companies with high margins
and efficiency are outperforming their competitors and more likely to have a well-established moat.
Efficiency is a good factor.
Fig 2. The performance of ROE (Efficiency) since 1965. The universe of stocks is split into deciles
by Return on Equity. The highest ROE to the lowest ROE. The portfolio was rebalanced each year
to keep it up to date. We can see that the decile with the highest ROE returned an average of ~12%
per year, whilst the lowest ROE returned an average of ~6% per year.
Health
NOTES ON HEALTH
Notes on Health:
Healthy companies are less likely to go bankrupt. While there are some correlations between
return and health, it should be used in conjunction with other factors. We can see that companies
who take on either too much debt or too little debt suffer. It is important to take on debt to grow, but
not too much or the company will go bankrupt.
Health is a poor factor when used on its own.
Fig 3. The performance of D/E (Health) since 1965. The universe of stocks is split into deciles by
Debt-to-equity. The highest D/E ratio to the lowest D/E ratio. The portfolio was rebalanced each
year to keep it up to date. We can see that the decile with the highest D/E returned an average of
~11% per year, whilst the lowest D/E returned an average of ~10.5% per year.
Dividend
NOTES ON DIVIDEND
Dividend investing is one of the most popular forms of investing amongst fundamental investors.
When dividend investing, it is important to reinvest your dividend payouts to maximise the
compound effect.
Dividend is a good factor.
Fig 4. The performance of Dividend since 1965. The universe of stocks is split into deciles by
Dividend Yield. The highest dividend yield to the lowest dividend yield . The portfolio was
rebalanced each year to keep it up to date. We can see that the decile with the highest dividend
yields returned an average of ~11.5% per year, whilst the lowest dividend yields returned an
average of ~9.5% per year.
Technical
NOTES ON MOMENTUM
Momentum (Relative Strength) is the most well-known and simplest of the technical metrics.
It simply looks at the price increase between two points in time. It plays on investor psychology and
can be summarised as “a security that has gone up in the recent past is likely to keep going up, and
visa versa”
Momentum is an excellent factor.
Fig 5. The performance of Momentum since 1965. The universe of stocks is split into deciles by
Momentum. The highest 6-month momentum to the lowest. The portfolio was rebalanced each year
to keep it up to date. We can see that the decile with the highest momentum returned an average of
~14% per year, whilst the lowest momentum (negative) returned an average of ~4% per year.
Size
NOTES ON SIZE
It is well-known that small-cap companies perform better than large-cap companies in the
long-term. The size factor is very powerful, though it should be noted that the lion’s share of returns
came from those stocks with a market cap less than $25M.
Size is a good factor.
Fig 5. The performance of Size since 1965. The universe of stocks is split into deciles by Size. The
largest companies to the smallest. The portfolio was rebalanced each year to keep it up to date. We
can see that the decile with the largest companies returned an average of ~8.5% per year, whilst
the smallest companies returned an average of ~11% per year.