Previewpdf
Previewpdf
Previewpdf
AND APPLICATIONS
PROTECTIVE RELAYING
THEORY AND APPLICATIONS
Second Edition, Revised and Expanded
WALTER A.ELMORE
Consulting Engineer
Blue Ridge, Virginia
Continuous change in protective relaying has been caused by two different influences.
One is the fact that the requirements imposed by power systems are in a constant state of
change, and our understanding of the basic concepts has sharpened considerably over the
years. The other is that the means of implementing the fundamental concepts of fault
location and removal and system restoration are constantly growing more sophisticated.
It is primarily because of these changing constraints that this text has been revised and
expanded. It began with contributions from two giants of the industry, J.Lewis Blackburn
and George D.Rockefeller. From the nucleus of their extensive analyses and writings, and
the desire to cover each new contingency with new relaying concepts, this volume has
evolved. New solutions to age-old problems have become apparent as greater experience
has been gained. No problem is without benefit in the solution found.
This new edition weeds out those relaying concepts that have run their course and
have been replaced by more perceptive methods of implementation using new solid-state
or microprocessor-based devices.
No single technological breakthrough has been more influential in generating change
than the microprocessor. Initially, the methods of translating a collection of instantaneous
samples of sine waves into useful current, direction, and impedance measurements were
not obvious. Diligent analysis and extensive testing allowed these useful functions to be
obtained and to be applied to the desired protective functions. This text attempts to
describe, in the simplest possible terms, the manner in which these digital measurements
are accomplished in present-day devices.
In addition to those already mentioned, huge contributions were made in the
development and refinement of the concepts described in this book by Hung Jen Li,
Walter Hinman, Roger Ray, James Crockett, Herb Lensner, A1 Regotti, Fernando Calero,
Eric Udren, James Greene, Liancheng Wang, Elmo Price, Solveig Ward, John McGowan,
and Cliff Downs. Some of these names may not be immediately recognizable, but all
have made an impact with their thoughtful, accurate, well-reasoned writings, and they all
deserve the gratitude of the industry for the wealth of knowledge they have contributed to
this book. I am keenly aware of the high quality of the technical offerings of these people,
and I am particularly grateful for the warmth and depth of their friendship.
Walter A.Elmore
Contents
Preface iv
Bibliography 690
Index 695
1
Introduction and General Philosophies
1 INTRODUCTION
Relays are compact analog, digital, and numerical devices that are connected throughout
the power system to detect intolerable or unwanted conditions within an assigned area.
They are, in effect, a form of active insurance designed to maintain a high degree of
service continuity and limit equipment damage. They are “silent sentinels.” Although
protective relays will be the main emphasis of this book, other types of relays applied on
a more limited basis or used as part of a total protective relay system will also be covered.
2 CLASSIFICATION OF RELAYS
Many modern relays contain several varieties of these functions. In addition to these
functional categories, relays may be classified by input, operating principle or structure,
and performance characteristic. The following are some of the classifications and
definitions described in ANSI/IEEE Standard C37.90 (see also ANSI/IEEE C37.100
“Definitions for Power Switch-gear”):
Inputs
Current
Voltage
Power
Pressure
Frequency
Temperature
Flow
Vibration
Performance Characteristics
Differential
Distance
Directional overcurrent
Inverse time
Definite time
Undervoltage
Overvoltage
Ground or phase
High or low speed
Pilot
Phase comparison
Directional comparison
Current differential
Introduction and general philosophies 3
A separate volume, Pilot Protective Relaying, covers pilot systems (those relaying
functions that involve a communications channel between stations.
2.1 Analog/Digital/Numerical
Solid-state (and static) relays are further categorized under one of the following
designations.
2.1.1 Analog
Analog relays are those in which the measured quantities are converted into lower
voltage but similar signals, which are then combined or compared directly to reference
values in level detectors to produce the desired output (e.g., SA-1 SOQ, SI-T, LCB,
circuit shield relays).
2.1.2 Digital
Digital relays are those in which the measured ac quantities are manipulated in analog
form and subsequently converted into square-wave (binary) voltages. Logic circuits or
microprocessors compare the phase relationships of the square waves to make a trip
decision (e.g., SKD-T, REZ-1).
2.1.3 Numerical
Numerical relays are those in which the measured ac quantities are sequentially sampled
and converted into numeric data form. A microprocessor performs mathematical and/or
logical operations on the data to make trip decisions (e.g., MDAR, MSOC, DPU, TPU,
REL-356, REL-350, REL-512).
Technically, most relays are small systems within themselves. Throughout this book,
however, the term system will be used to indicate a combination of relays of the same or
different types. Properly speaking, the protective relaying system includes circuit
breakers and current transformers (ct’s) as well as relays. Relays, ct’s, and circuit
breakers must function together. There is little or no value in applying one without the
other.
Protective relays or systems are not required to function during normal power system
operation, but must be immediately available to handle intolerable system conditions and
avoid serious outages and damage. Thus, the true operating life of these relays can be on
the order of a few seconds, even though they are connected in a system for many years.
In practice, the relays operate far more during testing and maintenance than in response
to adverse service conditions.
In theory, a relay system should be able to respond to an infinite number of
abnormalities that can possibly occur within the power system. In practice, the relay
Protective relaying theory and applications 4
engineer must arrive at a compromise based on the four factors that influence any relay
application:
The third and fourth considerations are perhaps better expressed as the “personality of the
system and the relay engineer.”
Since it is simply not feasible to design a protective relaying system capable of
handling any potential problem, compromises must be made. In general, only those
problems that, according to past experience, are likely to occur receive primary
consideration. Naturally, this makes relaying somewhat of an art. Different relay
engineers will, using sound logic, design significantly different protective systems for
essentially the same power system. As a result, there is little standardization in protective
relaying. Not only may the type of relaying system vary, but so will the extent of the
protective coverage. Too much protection is almost as bad as too little.
Nonetheless, protective relaying is a highly specialized technology requiring an in-
depth understanding of the power system as a whole. The relay engineer must know not
only the technology of the abnormal, but have a basic understanding of all the system
components and their operation in the system. Relaying, then, is a “vertical” speciality
requiring a “horizontal” viewpoint. This horizontal, or total system, concept of relaying
includes fault protection and the performance of the protection system during abnormal
system operation such as severe overloads, generation deficiency, out-of-step conditions,
and so forth. Although these areas are vitally important to the relay engineer, his or her
concern has not always been fully appreciated or shared by colleagues. For this reason,
close and continued communication between the planning, relay design, and operation
departments is essential. Frequent reviews of protective systems should be mandatory,
since power systems grow and operating conditions change.
A complex relaying system may result from poor system design or the economic need
to use fewer circuit breakers. Considerable savings may be realized by using fewer circuit
breakers and a more complex relay system. Such systems usually involve design
compromises requiring careful evaluation if acceptable protection is to be maintained. It
should be recognized that the exercise of the very best relaying application principles can
never compensate for the absence of a needed circuit breaker.
Introduction and general philosophies 5
3.1.1 Reliability
System reliability consists of two elements: dependability and security. Dependability is
the degree of certainty of correct operation in response to system trouble, whereas
security is the degree of certainty that a relay will not operate incorrectly. Unfortunately,
these two aspects of reliability tend to counter one another; increasing security tends to
decrease dependability and vice versa. In general, however, modern relaying systems are
highly reliable and provide a practical compromise between security and dependability.
The continuous supervision made possible by numerical techniques affords improvement
in both dependability and security. Protective relay systems must perform correctly under
adverse system and environmental conditions.
Dependability can be checked relatively easily in the laboratory or during installation
by simulated tests or a staged fault. Security, on the other hand, is much more difficult to
check. A true test of system security would have to measure response to an almost
infinite variety of potential transients and counterfeit trouble indications in the power
system and its environment. A secure system is usually the result of a good background
in design, combined with extensive model power system or EMTP (electromagnetic
transient program) testing, and can only be confirmed in the power system itself and its
environment.
3.1.2 Speed
Relays that could anticipate a fault are utopian. But, even if available, they would
doubtlessly raise the question of whether or not the fault or trouble really required a trip-
out. The development of faster relays must always be measured against the increased
probability of more unwanted or unexplained operations. Time is an excellent criterion
for distinguishing between real and counterfeit trouble.
Applied to a relay, high speed indicates that the operating time usually does not
exceed 50 ms (three cycles on a 60-Hz base). The term instantaneous indicates that no
delay is purposely introduced in the operation. In practice, the terms high speed and
instantaneous are frequently used interchangeably.
cost cannot always be justified. Consequently, both low- and high-speed relays are used
to protect power systems. Both types have high reliability records. Records on protective
relay operations consistently show 99.5% and better relay performance.
3.1.4 Simplicity
As in any other engineering discipline, simplicity in a protective relay system is always
the hallmark of good design. The simplest relay system, however, is not always the most
economical. As previously indicated, major economies may be possible with a complex
relay system that uses a minimum number of circuit breakers. Other factors being equal,
simplicity of design improves system reliability—if only because there are fewer
elements that can malfunction.
The first step in applying protective relays is to state the protection problem accurately.
Although developing a clear, accurate statement of the problem can often be the most
difficult part, the time spent will pay dividends—particularly when assistance from others
is
Protective relaying theory and applications 8
System configuration
Existing system protection and any known deficiencies
Existing operating procedures and practices and possible future
expansions
Degree of protection required
Fault study
Maximum load and current transformer locations and ratios
Voltage transformer locations, connections, and ratios
Impedance of lines, transformers, and generators
size of the generation; location, size, and connections of the power transformers and
capacitors; location and ratio of ct’s and vt’s; and system frequency.
Transformer connections are particularly important. For ground relaying, the location
of all ground “sources” must also be known.
Obviously, not all the above data are necessary in every application. It is desirable,
however, to review the system with respect to the above points and, wherever applicable,
compile the necessary data.
In any event, no amount of data can ensure a successful relay application unless the
protection problems are first defined. In fact, the application problem is essentially solved
when the available measures for distinguishing between tolerable and intolerable
conditions can be identified and specified.
Connected to the power system through the current and voltage transformers, protective
relays are wired into the control circuit to trip the proper circuit breakers. In the following
discussion, typical connections for relays mounted on conventional switchboards and for
rack-mounted solid-state relays will be used to illustrate the standard application
practices and techniques.
Phase rotation
Tripping direction
Current and voltage transformer polarities
Protective relaying theory and applications 12
All these designations are required for a directional relay. In other applications, some
may not apply. In accordance with convention, all relay contacts are shown in the
position they assume when the relay is deenergized.
A typical control circuit is shown in Figure 1–6. Three phase relays and one ground
relay are shown protecting this circuit. Any one could trip the associated circuit breaker
to isolate the trouble or fault area. A station battery, either 125 Vdc or 250 Vdc, is
commonly used for tripping. Lower-voltage batteries are not recommended for tripping
service when long trip leads are involved.
Protective relaying theory and applications 14
In small stations where a battery cannot be justified, tripping energy is obtained from a
capacitor trip device. This device is simply a capacitor charged, through a rectifier, by the
ac line voltage. An example of this arrangement is presented in Figure 1–7. When the
relay contacts close, the discharge of the energy in the capacitor through the trip coil is
sufficient to trip
Detailed logic diagrams plus ac and dc schematics are also required for a complete view
of the action to be expected from these relays.
6 CIRCUIT-BREAKER CONTROL
Complete tripping and closing circuits for circuit breakers are complex. A typical circuit
diagram is shown in Figure 1–10. In this diagram, the protective relay circuits, such as
that shown in Figure 1–6, are abbreviated to a single contact marked “prot relays.” While
the trip circuits must be energized from a source available during a fault (usually the
station battery), the closing circuits may be operated on ac. Such breakers have control
circuits similar to those shown in Figure 1–10, except that the 52X, 52Y, and 52CC
circuits are arranged for ac operation.
Protective relaying theory and applications 16
The scheme shown includes red light supervision of the trip coil, 52X/52Y antipump
control, and low-pressure and latch checks that most breakers contain in some form.
7 COMPARISON OF SYMBOLS
Various symbols are used throughout the world to represent elements of the power
system. Table 1–1 compiles a few of the differences.
Table 1–1 Comparison of Symbols
Element U.S. practice European
practice
Normally open contact
Normally closed contact
Form C
Breaker
Fault
Current transformer
Transformer