Memo Submitted by Avinash
Memo Submitted by Avinash
Memo Submitted by Avinash
The author Janet L. Abu-Lughod starts the discussion with origin of the two port
cities, the one is Venice and the other is Genoa.
Genoa is a harbor town with mountain base which was settled in 5th century BCE.
The crusade commenced in this city at tenth century, where Genoa indulges in
war against Muslims state. They received independence at the end of eleventh
century and formed an association of citizens 10 consuls.
Venice was established in 568, that time it was attached to Byzantium and due to
this Venice was protected from Lombard's. Venice trade salt, fish, timber and
slaves to their neighboring countries or states. They broke the blockade of
Norman Kingdom and also they rescue the Byzantine fleet from enemies.
Areas Covered by Genoa and Venice before Eleventh Century
Genoa lies on the west coast of Italy; from there they commanded the western
basin of the Mediterranean Sea. Genoa was gained significant trading from the
Spain of Muslims community and North Africa. Whereas, the venetians of Venice
strengthen their skills of communication in eastern basin of Mediterranean Sea.
They also gain the access to ports of Aegean island as well as Constantinople and
black sea.
After this, Author discuss about the impacts of crusades on the two port cities.
The Crusades leads the European region on the path of world economy. Genoese
and Pisan ships came to rescue of French, Flemish and other European knights.
Who had eagerly answered pope urban the second’s call for the “recon quest of
holy land from Muslims. According to the relative level of civilization in Europe
and the Levant, the crusaders are more akin to barbarians, who periodically
preyed on the settled wealth of high cultures than to carriers of the Mission
Civilisatrice. Moreover, crusaders helped the European economy by crushing their
enemies in their own land; venetians also joined the hands with crusaders and
help them in eliminating Jerusalem and Muslims population.
As per the promise after the crusades both cities got some rewards, like, Genoa
got one-third of city and suburbs of acre, one-fourth part of Jerusalem and of
Jaffa. And Venice got one-third of town’s land, special trading concessions and
allowed to form their own quarters.
Now, author discusses the alliance between the state and private capitalism.
In Venice, the arrangements were closer to state capitalism with a strong sub
component of individual enterprise. In Genoa, individual citizens were more
involved than the state in direct investment. This variation is possibly derived
from the difference in the origin of the two cities. Venice's elite class was less
fractured by interfamily feuds and competitive struggles that plagued other city-
states like Genoa. The nobility was derived from a landowning class that came
from the hinterlands. This resulted in a perpetuation of old rural military conflicts
into modern urban competition. In Venice, a municipal facility for shipbuilding
The Venice Arsenal was set up, with most of the ships being built by the
assistance of the wealthy families. In Genoa, shipbuilding was financed by
privately pooled capital while the state played a regulatory and facilitating role.
Another crucial institution to observe the variation is that of public debt. In
Venice, forced loans emerged to finance large campaigns and debt was levied as a
percentage of family wealth. In Genoa, the loans were subscribed voluntarily in
the form of purchases of shares.