The University of Chicago Press
The University of Chicago Press
The University of Chicago Press
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Critical
Inquiry.
http://www.jstor.org
SanderL. Gilman
204
These myths are often so powerful, and the associations of their conventions
so overpowering, that they are able to move from class to class without
substantial alteration. In linking otherwise marginally or totally unrelated
classes of individuals, the use of these conventions reveals perceptual
patterns which themselves illuminate the inherent ideology at work.
While the discussion of the function of conventions has helped reveal
the essential iconographic nature of all visual representation, it has mainly
been limited to a specific sphere-aesthetics. And although the definition
of the aesthetic has expanded greatly in the past decade to include every-
thing from decoration to advertising, it continues to dominate discussions
of visual conventions. Patterns of conventions are established within the
world of art or between that world and parallel ones, such as the world
of literature, but they go no farther. We maintain a special sanctity about
the aesthetic object which we deny to the conventions of representation
in other areas.
This essay is an attempt to plumb the conventions (and thus the
ideologies) which exist at a specific historical moment in both the aesthetic
and scientific ppheres. I will assume the existence of a web of conventions
within the world of the aesthetic-conventions which have elsewhere
been admirably illustrated-but will depart from the norm by examining
the synchronic existence of another series of conventions, those of medicine.
I do not mean in any way to accord special status to medical conventions.
Indeed, the world is full of overlapping and intertwined systems of con-
ventions, of which the medical and the aesthetic are but two. Medicine
offers an especially interesting source of conventions since we do tend
to give medical conventions special "scientific" status as opposed to the
"subjective" status of the aesthetic conventions. But medical icons are no
more "real"than "aesthetic" ones. Like aesthetic icons, medical icons may
(or may not) be rooted in some observed reality. Like them, they are
iconographic in that they represent these realities in a manner determined
by the historical position of the observers, their relationship to their own
time, and to the history of the conventions which they employ. Medicine
uses its categories to structure an image of the diversity of mankind; it
is as much at the mercy of the needs of any age to comprehend this
infinite diversity as any other system which organizes our perception of
the world. The power of medicine, at least in the nineteenth century,
at Seba on the river Pishon ... is a people ... who, like animals,
eat of the herbs that grow on the banks of the Nile and in the fields.
They go about naked and have not the intelligence of ordinary
men. They cohabit with their sisters and anyone they can find....
And these are the Black slaves, the sons of Ham.10
By the eighteenth century, the sexuality of the black, both male and
female, becomes an icon for deviant sexuality in general; as we have
seen, the black figure appears almost always paired with a white figure
of the opposite sex. By the nineteenth century, as in the Olympia,or more
crudely in one of a series of Viennese erotic prints entitled "The Servant"
(fig. 4), the central female figure is associated with a black female in such
a way as to imply their sexual similarity. The association of figures of
the same sex stresses the special status of female sexuality. In "The Servant"
the overt sexuality of the black child indicates the covert sexuality of the
white woman, a sexuality quite manifest in the other plates in the series.
The relationship between the sexuality of the black woman and that of
the sexualized white woman enters a new dimension when contemporary
scientific discourse concerning the nature of black female sexuality is
examined.
Buffon commented on the lascivious, apelike sexual appetite of the
black, introducing a commonplace of early travel literature into a "scientific"
context." He stated that this animallike sexual appetite went so far as to
lead black women to copulate with apes. The black female thus comes
to serve as an icon for black sexuality in general. Buffon's view was based
on a confusion of two applications of the great chain of being to the
nature of the black. Such a scale was employed to indicate the innate
difference between the races: in this view of mankind, the black occupied
the antithetical position to the white on the scale of humanity. This
polygenetic view was applied to all aspects of mankind, including sexuality
and beauty. The antithesis of European sexual mores and beauty is em-
bodied in the black, and the essential black, the lowest rung on the great
chain of being, is the Hottentot. The physical appearance of the Hottentot
is, indeed, the central nineteenth-century icon for sexual difference between
the European and the black-a perceived difference in sexual physiology
which puzzled even early monogenetic theoreticians such as Johann
Friedrich Blumenbach.
Such labeling of the black female as more primitive, and therefore
more sexually intensive, by writers like the Abbe Raynal would have been
dismissed as unscientific by the radical empiricists of late eighteenth- and
early nineteenth-century Europe." To meet their scientific standards, a
paradigm was needed which would technically place both the sexuality
and the beauty of the black in an antithetical position to that of the white.
This paradigm would have to be rooted in some type of unique and
observable physical difference; they found that difference in the distinction
they drew between the pathological and the normal in the medical model.
William Bynum has contended that nineteenth-century biology constantly
needed to deal with the polygenetic argument. We see the validity of his
contention demonstrated here, for the medical model assumes the poly-
genetic difference between the races.'"
It was in the work of J. J. Virey that this alteration of the mode of
discourse-though not of the underlying ideology concerning the black
female-took place. He was the author of the study of race standard in
the early nineteenth century and also contributed a major essay (the only
one on a specific racial group) to the widely cited Dictionnairedes sciences
midicales [Dictionaryof medicalsciences] (1819). 4 In this essay, Virey sum-
marized his (and his contemporaries') views on the sexual nature of black
females in terms of acceptable medical discourse. According to him, their
"voluptuousness" is "developed to a degree of lascivity unknown in our
climate, for their sexual organs are much more developed than those of
whites." Elsewhere, Virey cites the Hottentot woman as the epitome of
this sexual lasciviousness and stresses the relationship between her physi-
ology and her physiognomy (her "hideous form" and her "horriblyflattened
nose"). His central proof is a discussion of the unique structure of the
Hottentot female's sexual parts, the description of which he takes from
the anatomical studies published by his contemporary, Georges Cuvier.'5
According to Cuvier, the black female looks different. Her physiognomy,
her skin color, the form of her genitalia label her as inherently different.
In the nineteenth century, the black female was widely perceived as
possessing not only a "primitive" sexual appetite but also the external
signs of this temperament-"primitive" genitalia. Eighteenth-century
travelers to southern Africa, such as Frangois Le Vaillant and John
Barrow, had described the so-called Hottentot apron, a hypertrophy of
the labia and nymphae caused by the manipulation of the genitalia and
serving as a sign of beauty among certain tribes, including the Hottentots
and Bushmen as well as tribes in Basutoland and Dahomey.'6
The exhibition in 1810 of Saartjie Baartman, also called Sarah Bart-
mann or Saat-Jee and known as the "Hottentot Venus," caused a public
scandal in a London inflamed by the issue of the abolition of slavery,
since she was exhibited "to the public in a manner offensive to decency.
She ... does exhibit all the shape and frame of her body as if naked"
(fig. 5). The state's objection was as much to her lewdness as to her status
as an indentured black. In France her presentation was similar. Sarah
Bartmann was not the only African to be so displayed: in 1829 a nude
Hottentot woman, also called "the Hottentot Venus," was the prize at-
traction at a ball given by the Duchess Du Barry in Paris. A contemporary
print emphasized her physical difference from the observers portrayed
(fig. 6)."7 After more than five years of exhibition in Europe, Sarah
Bartmann died in Paris in 1815 at the age of twenty-five. An autopsy
was performed on her which was first written up by Henri de Blainville
in 1816 and then, in its most famous version, by Cuvier in 1817.18 Reprinted
at least twice during the next decade, Cuvier's description reflected de
Blainville's two intentions: the comparison of a female of the "lowest"
human species with the highest ape (the orangutan) and the description
of the anomalies of the Hottentot's "organ of generation." It is important
to note that Sarah Bartmann was exhibited not to show her genitalia but
rather to present another anomaly which the European audience (and
pathologists such as de Blainville and Cuvier) found riveting. This was
the steatopygia, or protruding buttocks, the other physical characteristic
of the Hottentot female which captured the eye of early European travelers.
Thus the figure of Sarah Bartmann was reduced to her sexual parts. The
audience which had paid to see her buttocks and had fantasized about
the uniqueness of her genitalia when she was alive could, after her death
and dissection, examine both, for Cuvier presented to "the Academy the
*LA
J•.•..!?
.,
--L.Yi 'I,•'
3,1 .
'
i.
She would have had a good figure, only that her bottom was out
of all proportion. It was too big, but nevertheless it was fairly well
shaped, with well-rounded cheeks meeting each other closely, her
thighs were large, and she had a sturdy pair of legs, her skin was
smooth and of a clear yellow tint.so
.L~t
IP . F Atw
j.
: " •. ?
• . .• . .
?
. " •
•i• .!. :.. o•..i. , . ,
,
I ? ; • "
?• • •
? ''.. .,O , , ., . ,' . . :, . ? ,••
, ? , .• : ,
j , . ..; ? •
"
•. .•
:•;•• i.• •, ,,o ,•. .. .• :. .:
C. '•... .::•."
,,ii...
" ;:.. ,••::.....",.•,' •• "..*•
.,
• . : •*•'
,: •J,.o-
,..,,-,. •,. . .., •- , • .
FIG.I1.-"The RussianHelen."Tarnowsky,
"Fisionomie
di FIG.12.-"The
prostituterusse,"pl. 25, 1893. omie di prostituter
scale "might pass on the street for beauties." But hidden even within
these seeming beauties are the stigmata of criminal degeneration: black,
thick hair; a strong jaw; a hard, spent glance. Some show the "wild eyes
and perturbed countenance along with facial asymmetry" of the insane
(fig. 12).38Only the scientific observer can see the hidden faults, and thus
identify the true prostitute, for prostitutes use superficial beauty as the
bait for their clients. But when they age, their
strong jaws and cheek-bones, and their masculine aspect ... [once]
hidden by adipose tissue, emerge, salient angles stand out, and the
face grows virile, uglier than a man's; wrinkles deepen into the
likeness of scars, and the countenance, once attractive, exhibits the
full degenerate type which early grace had concealed.39
,,4
?,
.t
i"
i•.
t
l?
Aigi
female presented to the viewer unclothed but with her genitalia demurely
covered. The association is between these hidden genitalia and the signifier
of the black. Both point to potential corruption of the male viewer by
the female. This is made even more evident in that work which art
historians have stressed as being heavily influenced by Manet's Olympia,
his portrait Nana. Here the associations would have been quite clear to
the contemporary viewer. First, the model for the painting was Henriette
Hauser, called Citron, the mistress of the prince of Orange. Second,
Manet places in the background of the painting a Japanese crane, for
which the French word (grue) was a slang term for prostitute. He thus
labels the figure as a sexualized female. Unlike the classical pose of the
Olympia,Nana is presented being admired by a well-dressed man-about-
town (aflineur). She is not naked but partially clothed. What Manet can
further draw upon is the entire vocabulary of signs which, by the late
nineteenth century, were associated with the sexualized female. Nana is
fulsome rather than thin. Here Manet employs the stigmata of fatness
to characterize the prostitute. This convention becomes part of the vis-
ualization of the sexualized female even while the reality of the idealized
sexualized female is that of a thin female. Constantin Guys presents a
fat, reclining prostitute in 1860, while Edgar Degas' Madam's Birthday
(1879) presents an entire brothel of fat prostitutes. At the same time,
Napoleon III's mistress, Marguerite Bellanger, set a vogue for slenderness.
She was described as "below average in size, slight, thin, almost skinny."47
This is certainly not Nana. Manet places her in a position vis-a-vis the
viewer (but not the male observer in the painting) which emphasizes the
line of her buttocks, the steatopygia of the prostitute. Second, Nana is
placed in such a way that the viewer (but again not thefldneur) can observe
her ear. It is, to no one's surprise, Darwin's ear, a sign of the atavistic
female. Thus we know where the black servant is hidden in Nana-within
Nana. Even Nana's seeming beauty is but a sign of the black hidden
within. All her external stigmata point to the pathology within the sexualized
female.
Manet's Nana thus provides a further reading of his Olympia,a reading
which stresses Manet's debt to the pathological model of sexuality present
during the late nineteenth century. The black hidden within Olympia
bursts forth in Pablo Picasso's 1901 version of the painting: Olympia is
presented as a sexualized black, with broad hips, revealed genitalia, gazing
at the nudefldneur bearing her a gift of fruit, much as Laura bears a gift
of flowers in Manet's original (fig. 16). But, unlike Manet, the artist is
himself present in this work, as a sexualized observer of the sexualized
female. Picasso owes part of his reading of the Olympiato the polar image
of the primitive female as sexual object, as found in the lower-class
prostitutes painted by Vincent van Gogh or the Tahitian maidens t la
Diderot painted by Paul Gauguin. Picasso saw the sexualized female as
the visual analogue of the black. Indeed, in his most radical break with
Nana was in the nude: naked with a quiet audacity, certain of the
omnipotence of her flesh. She was wrapped in a simple piece of
gauze: her rounded shoulders, her Amazon's breasts of which the
pink tips stood up rigidly like lances, her broad buttocks which
rolled in a voluptuous swaying motion, and her fair, fat hips: her
whole body was in evidence, and could be seen under the light
tissue with its foamy whiteness.49
What Zola describes are the characteristics of the sexualized woman, the
"primitive" hidden beneath the surface: "all of a sudden in the comely
child the woman arose, disturbing, bringing the mad surge of her sex,
inviting the unknown element of desire. Nana was still smiling: but it
was the smile of a man-eater." Nana's atavistic sexuality, the sexuality of
the Amazon, is destructive. The sign of this is her fleshliness. And it is
this sign which reappears when she is observed by Muffat in her dressing
room, the scene which Zola found in Manet's painting:
Nana's childlike face is but a mask which conceals the hidden disease
buried within, the corruption of sexuality. Thus Zola concludes the novel
by revealing the horror beneath the mask: Nana dies of the pox. (Zola's
pun works in French as well as in English and is needed because of the
rapidity of decay demanded by the moral implication of Zola's portrait.
It would not do to have Nana die slowly over thirty years of tertiary
syphilis. Smallpox, with its play on "the pox," works quickly and gives
the same visual icon of decay.) Nana's death reveals her true nature:
Nana remained alone, her face looking up in the light from the
candle. It was a charnel-house scene, a mass of tissue-fluids and
blood, a shovelful of putrid flesh thrown there on a cushion. The
pustules had invaded the entire face with the pocks touching each
other; and, dissolving and subsiding with the greyish look of mud,
there seemed to be already an earthy mouldiness on the shapeless
muscosity, in which the features were no longer discernible. An
eye, the left one, had completely subsided in a soft mass of purulence;
the other, half-open, was sinking like a collapsing hole. The nose
was still suppurating. A whole reddish crust was peeling off one
cheek and invaded the mouth, distorting it into a loathsome grimace.
And on that horrible and grotesque mask, the hair, that beautiful
head of hair still preserving its blaze of sunlight, flowed down in a
golden trickle. Venus was decomposing. It seems as though the
virus she had absorbed from the gutters and from the tacitly permitted
carrion of humanity, that baneful ferment with which she had poi-
soned a people, had now risen to her face and putrefied it. [N, pp.
464-65]
The decaying visage is the visible sign of the diseased genitalia through
which the sexualized female corrupts an entire nation of warriors and
leads them to the collapse of the French Army and the resultant German
victory at Sedan. The image is an old one, it is Frau Welt, Madam World,
who masks her corruption, the disease of being a woman, through her
beauty. It reappears in the vignette on the title page of the French
translation (1840) of the Renaissance poem Syphilis (fig. 17).50 But it is
yet more, for in death Nana begins to revert to the blackness of the earth,
to assume the horrible grotesque countenance perceived as belonging to
the world of the black, the world of the "primitive,"the world of disease.
Nana is, like Olympia, in the words of Paul Valery, "pre-eminently un-
clean." 1
It is this uncleanliness, this disease, which forms the final link between
two images of woman, the black and the prostitute. Just as the genitalia
of the Hottentot were perceived as parallel to the diseased genitalia of
the prostitute, so too the power of the idea of corruption links both
images. Thus part of Nana's fall into corruption comes through her
seduction by a lesbian, yet a further sign of her innate, physical degeneracy.
She is corrupted and corrupts through sexuality. Miscegenation was a
fear (and a word) from the late nineteenth-century vocabulary of sexuality.
It was a fear not merely of interracial sexuality but of its results, the
decline of the population. Interracial marriages were seen as exactly
parallel to the barrenness of the prostitute; if they produced children at
all, these children were weak and doomed. Thus Ellis, drawing on his
view of the objective nature of the beauty of mankind, states that "it is
difficult to be sexually attracted to persons who are fundamentally unlike
ourselves in racial constitution" (SPS, p. 176). He cites Abel Hermant to
substantiate his views:
It is thus the inherent fear of the difference in the anatomy of the Other
which lies behind the synthesis of images. The Other's pathology is revealed
in anatomy. It is the similarity between the black and the prostitute-as
bearers of the stigmata of sexual difference and, thus, pathology-which
captured the late nineteenth century. Zola sees in the sexual corruption
of the male the source of political impotence and projects what is basically
an internal fear, the fear of loss of power, onto the world.5"
The "white man's burden" thus becomes his sexuality and its control,
and it is this which is transferred into the need to control the sexuality
of the Other, the Other as sexualized female. The colonial mentality
which sees "natives"as needing control is easily transferred to "woman"-
but woman as exemplified by the caste of the prostitute. This need for
control was a projection of inner fears; thus, its articulation in visual
images was in terms which described the polar opposite of the European
male.
The roots of this image of the sexualized female are to be found in
male observers, the progenitors of the vocabulary of images through
which they believed themselves able to capture the essence of the Other.
Thus when Freud, in his Essayon LayAnalysis(1926), discusses the ignorance
1. The debate between E. H. Gombrich, The Image and the Eye (Ithaca, N.Y., 1982)
and Nelson Goodman, Waysof Worldmaking(Hassocks, 1978) has revolved mainly around
the manner by which conventions of representation create the work of art. Implicit in their
debate is the broader question of the function of systems of conventions as icons within
the work of art itself. On the limitation of the discussion of systems of conventions to
aesthetic objects, see the extensive bibliography compiled in Ulrich Weisstein, "Bibliography
of Literature and the Visual Arts, 1945-1980," ComparativeCriticism4 (1982): 324-34, in
which the special position of the work of art as separate from other aspects of society can
be seen. This is a holdover from the era of Geistesgeschichtein which special status was given
to the interaction between aesthetic objects.
This can be seen in the alternative case of works of aesthetic provenance which are,
however, part of medical discourse. One thinks immediately of the anatomical works of
Leonardo or George Stubbs or of paintings with any medical reference such as Rembrandt's
Dr. Tulp or Theodore G6ricault's paintings of the insane. When the literature on these
works is examined, it is striking how most analysis remains embedded in the discourse of
aesthetic objects, i.e., the anatomical drawing as a "subjective" manner of studying human
form or, within medical discourse, as part of a "scientific"history of anatomical illustration.
The evident fact that both of these modes of discourse exist simultaneously in the context
of social history is lost on most critics. An exception is William Schupbach, The Paradox of
Rembrandt's"Anatomyof Dr. Tulp," Medical History, supp. 2 (London, 1982).
2. George Heard Hamilton, Manet and His Critics (New Haven, Conn., 1954), p. 68.
I am ignoring here George Mauner's peculiar position that "we may conclude that Manet
makes no comment at all with this painting, if by comment we understand judgment or
criticism" (Manet: Peintre-Philosophe:A Study of the Painter's Themes [University Park, Pa.,
1975], p. 99).
3. For my discussion of Manet's works, I draw especially on Theodore Reff, Manet:
"Olympia"(London, 1976), and Werner Hofmann, Nana: Mythosund Wirklichkeit(Cologne,
1973); neither of these studies examines the medical analogies. See also Eunice Lipton,
"Manet: A Radicalized Female Imagery," Artforum 13 (Mar. 1975): 48-53.
4. See George Needham, "Manet, Olympia,and Pornographic Photography," in Woman
as Sex Object,ed. Thomas Hess and Linda Nochlin (New York, 1972), pp. 81-89.
5. See Philippe Rebeyrol, "Baudelaire et Manet," Les Temps modernes5 (Oct. 1949):
707-25.
6. Georges Bataille, Manet, trans. A. Wainhouse andJames Emmons (New York, 1956),
p. 113. And see Hofmann, Nana.
7. See Edmund Bazire, quoted in Anne Coffin Hanson, Manet and the Modern Tradition
(New Haven, Conn., 1977), p. 130.
8. See my On BlacknesswithoutBlacks:Essayson theImage of theBlack in Germany(Boston,
1982). On the image of the black, see Ladislas Bugner, ed., L'Image du noir dans l'art
occidental, 3 vols. (Paris, 1976-); the fourth volume, not yet published, will cover the post-
Renaissance period.
9. See the various works on Hogarth by Ronald Paulson, such as Hogarth: His Life,
Art, and Times, 2 vols. (New Haven, Conn., 1971) and Hogarth's GraphicWorks,2 vols. (New
Haven, Conn., 1970); and see Ross E. Taggert, "A Tavern Scene: An Evening at the Rose,"
Art Quarterly 19 (Autumn 1956): 320-23.
10. M. N. Adler, trans., The Itineraryof Benjamin of Tudela (London, 1907), p. 68.
11. See John Herbert Eddy, Jr., "Buffon, Organic Change, and the Races of Man"
(Ph.D. diss., University of Oklahoma, 1977), p. 109. See also Paul Alfred Erickson, "The
Origins of Physical Anthropology" (Ph.D. diss., University of Connecticut, 1974) and Werner
Krauss, Zur Anthropologiedes achtzehntenJahrhunderts:Die Friihgeschichteder Menschheit im
Blickpunktder Aujklirung, ed. Hans Kortum and Christa Gohrisch (Munich, 1979).
12. See Guillaum-Thomas Raynal, Histoire philosophiqueet politique des itablissemenset
du commercedes Europdensdans les deux Indes, 10 vols. (Geneva, 1775), 2:406-7.
13. See William F. Bynum, "The Great Chain of Being after Forty Years: An Appraisal,"
History of Science 13 (1975): 1-28, and "Time's Noblest Offspring: The Problem of Man in
British Natural Historical Sciences" (Ph.D. diss., Cambridge, 1974).
14. See J. J. Virey, "Negre," Dictionnaire des sciences midicales, 41 vols. (Paris, 1819),
35:398-403.
15. See Virey, Histoire naturelle du genre humaine, 2 vols. (Paris, 1824), 2:151.
16. See George M. Gould and Walter L. Pyle, Anomalies and Curiosities of Medicine
(Philadelphia, 1901), p. 307, and Eugen Hollinder, Aeskulap und Venus: Eine Kultur- und
Sittengeschichteim Spiegel des Arztes (Berlin, 1928). Much material on the indebtedness of
the early pathologists to the reports of travelers to Africa can be found in the accounts of
the autopsies I will discuss below.
One indication of the power which the image of the Hottentot still possessed in the
late nineteenth century can be found in George Eliot, Daniel Deronda, ed. Barbara Hardy
(1876; Harmondsworth, 1967). On its surface the novel is a hymn to racial harmony and
an attack on British middle-class bigotry. Eliot's liberal agenda is nowhere better articulated
than in the ironic debate concerning the nature of the black in which the eponymous hero
of the novel defends black sexuality (see p. 376). This position is attributed to the hero
not a half-dozen pages after the authorial voice of the narrator introduced the description
of this very figure with the comparison: "And one man differs from another, as we all
differ from the Bosjesman" (p. 370). Eliot's comment is quite in keeping with the underlying
understanding of race in the novel. For just as Deronda is fated to marry a Jewess and
thus avoid the taint of race mixing, so too is the Bushman, a Hottentot surrogate in the
nineteenth century, isolated from the rest of mankind. The ability of Europeans to hold
simultaneously a polygenetic view of race and a liberal ideology is evident as far back as
Voltaire. But in Eliot's novel the Jew is contrasted to the Hottentot, and, as we have seen,
it is the Hottentot who serves as the icon of pathologically corrupted sexuality. Can Eliot
be drawing a line between outsiders such as the Jew or the sexualized female in Western
society and the Hottentot? The Hottentot comes to serve as the sexualized Other onto
whom Eliot projects the opprobrium with which she herself was labeled. For Eliot, the
Hottentot remains beyond the pale; even in the most whiggish text, the Hottentot remains
the essential Other.
17. Paul Edwards and James Walvin, Black Personalities in the Era of the Slave Trade
(Baton Rouge, La., 1983), pp. 173, 175. A print of the 1829 ball in Paris with the nude
"Hottentot Venus" is reproduced in IllustrierteGeschichteder Medizin, ed. Richard Toellner,
9 vols. (Salzburg, 1980), 4:1319; this is a German reworking of Jacques Vie et al., Histoire
de la mddecine,8 vols. (Paris, 1977).
18. See Henri de Blainville, "Sur une femme de la race hottentote," Bulletin des sciences
par la sociiti philomatiquede Paris (1816): 183-90. This early version of the autopsy seems
to be unknown to William B. Cohen, The French Encounter with Africans: WhiteResponseto
Blacks, 1530-1880 (Bloomington, 1980), esp. pp. 239-45. See also Stephen Jay Gould,
"The Hottentot Venus," Natural History 91 (1982): 20-27.
19. Georges Cuvier, "Extraits d'observations faites sur le cadavre d'une femme connue
a Paris et a Londres sous le nom de Venus Hottentote," Memoires du Museum d'histoire
naturelle 3 (1817): 259-74; rpt. with plates in Geoffrey Saint-fHilaire and Frederic Cuvier,
Histoire naturelle des mammiferesavec desfigures originales, 2 vols. (Paris, 1824), 1:1-23. The
substance of the autopsy is reprinted again by Flourens in the Journal complhmentairedu
dictionnairedes sciencesmidicales 4 (1819): 145-49, and by Jules Cloquet, Manuel d'anatomie
de l'hommedescriptivedu corps humaine (Paris, 1825), pl. 278. Cuvier's presentation of the
"Hottentot Venus" forms the major signifier for the image of the Hottentot as sexual
primitive in the nineteenth century.
20. See, e.g., Walker D. Greer, "John Hunter: Order out of Variety," Annals of the
Royal College of Surgeons of England 28 (1961): 238-51. See also Barbara J. Babiger, "The
Kunst- und Wunderkammern:A catalogue raisonne of Collecting in Germany, France and
England, 1565-1750" (Ph.D. diss., University of Pittsburgh, 1970).
21. See Adolf Wilhelm Otto, SelteneBeobachtungenzur Anatomie,Physiologie,und Pathologie
gehorig (Breslau, 1816), p. 135; Johannes Miiller, "Ueber die iusseren Geschlechtstheile
der Buschminninnen," Archivfiir Anatomie,Physiologie,und wissenschaftlicheMedizin (1834),
pp. 319-45; W. H. Flower and James Murie, "Account of the Dissection of a Bushwoman,"
Journal of Anatomyand Physiology 1 (1867): 189-208; and Hubert von Luschka, A. Koch,
and E. G6rtz, "Die iusseren Geschlechtstheile eines Buschweibes,"MonatsschriftfiirGeburtskunde
32 (1868): 343-50. The popularity of these accounts can be seen by their republication
in extract for a lay audience. These extracts also stress the sexual anomalies described. See
AnthropologicalReview 5 (July, 1867): 319-24, and AnthropologicalReview 8 (Jan., 1870):
89-318.
22. Edward Turnipseed, "Some Facts in Regard to the Anatomical Differences between
the Negro and White Races," AmericanJournal of Obstetrics10 (1877): 32, 33.
23. See C. H. Fort, "Some Corroborative Facts in Regard to the Anatomical Difference
between the Negro and White Races,"AmericanJournal of Obstetrics10 (1877): 258-59. Paul
Broca was influenced by similar American material (which he cites from the New YorkCity
Medical Record, 15 Sept. 1868) concerning the position of the hymen; see his untitled note
in the Bulletins de la sociitd d'anthropologiede Paris 4 (1869): 443-44. Broca, like Cuvier
before him, supported a polygenetic view of the human races.
24. See William Turner, "Notes on the Dissection of a Negro,"Journal of Anatomyand
Physiology 13 (1878): 382-86; "Notes on the Dissection of a Second Negro," Journal of
Anatomyand Physiology14 (1879): 244-48; and "Notes on the Dissection of a Third Negro,"
Journal of Anatomyand Physiology31 (1896): 624-26. This was not merely a British anomaly.
Jefferies Wyman reports the dissection of a black suicide (originally published in Proceed-
ings of the Boston Society of Natural History, 2 Apr. 1862 and 16 Dec. 1863) and does not
refer to the genitalia of the male Hottentot at all; see AnthropologicalReview 3 (1865): 330-
35.
25. H. Hildebrandt, Die Krankheitender diusserenweiblichenGenitalien, in Handbuch der
Frauenkrankheiten3, ed. Theodor Billroth, 3 vols. (Stuttgart, 1885-86), pp. 11-12. See also
Thomas Power Lowry, ed., The Classic Clitoris: Historic Contributionsto Scientific Sexuality
(Chicago, 1978).
26. Havelock Ellis, Studies in the Psychologyof Sex, vol. 4, Sexual Selectionin Man (Phil-
adelphia, 1920), p. 158; all further references to this work, abbreviated SPS, will be included
in the text.
27. See Willem Vrolik, Considerationssur la diversiti du bassindes diffirentesraceshumaines
(Amsterdam, 1826) and R. Verneau, Le bassin dans les sexes et dans les races (Paris, 1875),
pp. 126-29.
28. Charles Darwin, The Descentof Man and Selectionin Relation to Sex (Princeton, N.J.,
1981), 2:317, and see 2:345-46.
29. See John Grand-Carteret, Die Erotik in derfranz6sischenKarikatur,trans. Cary von
Karwarth and Adolf Neumann (Vienna, 1909), p. 195.
30. [Hugues Rebell?], The Memoriesof Dolly Morton: The Story of a Woman'sPart in the
Struggle to Free the Slaves: An Account of the Whippings,Rapes, and ViolencesThat Precededthe
Civil War in Americawith Curious AnthropologicalObservationson the Radical Diversities in the
Conformationof the Female Bottom and the Way Different WomenEndure Chastisement(Paris,
1899), p. 207.
31. See Sigmund Freud, The Standard Edition of the CompletePsychological Works of
Sigmund Freud, ed. and trans. James Strachey, 24 vols. (London, 1953-74), 7:186-87, esp.
n. 1; all further references to this work, abbreviated SE and with volume and page numbers,
will be included in the text.
32. The best study of the image of the prostitute is Alain Corbin, Lesfilles de noce:
Misere sexuelle et prostitution (dix-neuviime et vingtiime siecles) (Paris, 1978). On the black
prostitute, see Khalid Kishtainy, The Prostitutein ProgressiveLiterature(London, 1982), pp.
74-84. On the iconography associated with the pictorial iepresentation of the prostitute
in nineteenth-century art, see Hess and Nochlin, Womanas Sex Object;Nochlin, "Lost and
Found: Once More the Fallen Woman," Art Bulletin 60 (Mar. 1978): 139-53; and Lynda
Nead, "Seduction, Prostitution, Suicide: On theBrink by Alfred Elmore," Art History 5 (Sept.
1982): 310-22. On the special status of medical representations of female sexuality, see
the eighteenth-century wax models of female anatomy in the Museo della Specola, Florence,
and reproduced in Mario Bucci, Anatomia comearte (Florence, 1969), esp. pl. 8.
33. See A. J. B. Parent-Duchatelet, De la prostitutiondans la ville de Paris, 2 vols. (Paris,
1836), 1:193-244.
34. Parent-Duchatelet, On Prostitution in the City of Paris, (London, 1840), p. 38; all
further references to this work, abbreviated P, will be included in the text. It is exactly the
passages on the physiognomy and appearance of the prostitute which this anonymous
translator presents to his English audience as the essence of Parent-Duchatelet's work.
35. See my "Freud and the Prostitute: Male Stereotypes of Female Sexuality infin de
siecle Vienna,"Journal of the AmericanAcademyof Psychoanalysis9 (1981): 337-60.
36. See V. M. Tarnowsky, Prostitutsijai abolitsioniszm(Petersburg, 1888) and Prostitution
und Abolitionismus(Hamburg, 1890).
37. See Pauline Tarnowsky, Etude anthropometrique sur lesprostitueeset les voleuses(Paris,
1889).
38. Tarnowsky, "Fisiomie di prostitute russe," Archivio di psichiatria, scienze penali e
antropologiacriminale 14 (1893): 141-42; my translation.
39. Ibid., p. 141; my translation.
40. See Cesare Lombroso and Guillaume Ferrero, La donna deliquente:La prostitutae
la donna normale (Turin, 1893), esp. pp. 349-50, 361-62, and 38.
41. See Adrien Charpy, "Des organes genitaux externes chez les prostitutes," Annales
des dermatologie3 (1870-71): 271-79.
a
42. See L. Jullien, "Contribution l'atude de la morphologie des prostitutes," in
Congris international d'anthropologiecriminelle, 1896 (Geneva, 1897), pp. 348-49.
Quatrinme
43. See Ferrero, "L'atavisme de la prostitution," Revue scientifique(1892): 136-41.
44. See A. de Blasio, "Staetopigia in prostitute," Archivio di psichiatria 26 (1905):
257-64.
45. See Winthrop D. Jordan, WhiteoverBlack:AmericanAttitudestowardtheNegro, 1550-
1812 (New York, 1977), pp. 3-43.
46. See Iwan Bloch, Der Ursprung der Syphilis;Eine medizinischeund kulturgeschichtliche
Untersuchung, 2 vols. (Jena, 1901-11).
47. Reff, Manet: "Olympia,"p. 58; see also p. 118.
48. See Theodore Lascaris [Auriant], La vdritablehistoirede "Nana"(Paris, 1942). See
also Demetra Palamari, "The Shark Who Swallowed His Epoch: Family, Nature, and Society
in the Novels of Emile Zola," in Changing Images of the Family, ed. Virginia Tufte and
Barbara Myerhoff (New Haven, Conn., 1979), pp. 155-72.
49. Emile Zola, Nana, trans. Charles Duff (London, 1953), p. 27; all further references
to this work, abbreviated N, will be included in the text.
50. See August Barthelemy, trans., Syphilis:Poeme en deux chants (Paris, 1840). This is
a translation of a section of Fracastorius' Latin poem on the nature and origin of syphilis.
The French edition was in print well past mid-century.
51. Paul Valery, quoted in Bataille, Manet, p. 65.
52. Abel Hermant, quoted in Ellis, Studies in the Psychologyof Sex, 4:176 n. 1.
53. See Joachim Hohmann, ed., Schonauf den erstenBlick: Lesebuchzur Geschichteunserer
Feindbilder(Darmstadt, 1981).
54. See Renate Schlesier, Konstruktionder Weiblichkeitbei Sigmund Freud (Frankfurt,
1981), pp. 35-39.