Fundamentals of The Stiffness Method of Structural Analysis: Objectives
Fundamentals of The Stiffness Method of Structural Analysis: Objectives
2
The Stiffness Method
Illustration case 1
Consider the analysis of the statically- and kinematically-indeterminate beam
shown
In the application of the stiffness method, the first step is to alter the original
structure by creating a restrained structure that is kinematically-determinate
(compare this with the first step in flexibility method; creating a released structure
that is statically-determinate).
Analysis of the restrained structure along with those corresponding to unit
displacements yield results that are used in action equations to solve the problem.
3
The Stiffness Method
Illustration case 1
𝑤𝐿2
From Table B-1, 𝑀𝐵 =
12
Fig. 1:
Original Now, determine the action MB caused
structure by the kinematic redundant B, as in
Fig. 3 (using Table B-4)
Fig. 2:
4𝐸𝐼
𝑀𝐵 = 𝜃𝐵
Restrained 𝐿
structure under
original load Superimposing the actions in Fig. 2
and 3 produces the actions on the
original beam. Thus
Fig. 3:
Restrained structure
with action applied
𝑤𝐿2 4𝐸𝐼 𝑤𝐿3
= 𝜃𝐵 ⇒ 𝜃𝐵 =
corresponding to the 12 𝐿 48𝐸𝐼
kinematic redundant 4
The Stiffness Method
Illustration case 1 (Systematic)
Alternatively, we can determine the action
MB caused by a unit kinematic redundant
Fig. 1: B, as in Fig. 4
Original 4𝐸𝐼
structure 𝑚𝐵 =
𝐿
Following the sense of the k. redundant,
Fig. 2: 𝑤𝐿2
Restrained 𝑀𝐵 = −
structure under 12
By superposition,
original load
𝑀 = 𝑀𝐵 + 𝑚𝐵 𝜃𝐵 = 0, or
Fig. 4:
Restrained structure 𝑤𝐿2 4𝐸𝐼 𝑤𝐿3
with action applied − + 𝜃𝐵 ⇒ 𝜃𝐵 =
corresponding to a unit 12 𝐿 48𝐸𝐼
of kinematic redundant 5
The Stiffness Method
Illustration case 1 (Systematic)
Similarly, we can determine the reaction R
by superposition as
Fig. 1:
Original 𝑅 = 𝑅𝐴 + 𝑟𝐴 𝜃𝐵
structure
Using expressions from Tables B-1 and B-4,
The beam has more than one kinematic redundant. The analysis can proceed in the
same manner as before but more elaborately
7
The Stiffness Method
Illustration case 2
Note that all original loads are applied on the restrained
structure except those corresponding to the unknown
displacements (k. redundants)
The equations of action superposition to be solved are:
𝑃𝐿 𝑃 𝑃𝐿
𝐴𝑀𝐿1 = 𝑃; 𝐴𝑀𝐿2 =− ; 𝐴𝑀𝐿3 = ; 𝐴𝑀𝐿4 =
4 2 8
𝐴𝑀𝐿1 8
𝐴𝑀𝐿2 𝑃 −2𝐿
⇒ 𝐀ML = =
𝐴𝑀𝐿3 8 4
𝐴𝑀𝐿4 𝐿
10
The Stiffness Method
Illustration case 2 Stiffness, reaction and end-action coefficients:
6𝐸𝐼
− 2 0
𝐿
4𝐸𝐼 −6 0
0 𝐸𝐼 4𝐿
𝐿 0
𝐴𝑀𝐷 = = 2
6𝐸𝐼 6𝐸𝐼 𝐿 6 6
𝐿2 𝐿2 4𝐿 2𝐿
4𝐸𝐼 2𝐸𝐼
𝐿 𝐿
𝑃𝐿
𝐀𝐷 =
Solve for displacements 0
𝐀𝐷 = 𝐀𝐷𝐿 + 𝐒𝐃 ⇒ 𝐃 = 𝐒 −1 𝐀𝐷 − 𝐀𝐷𝐿
𝐿 1 2 −1 𝑃𝐿 𝑃𝐿 −1 𝑃𝐿2 17
𝐃= − =
2𝐸𝐼 7 −1 4 0 8 −1 112𝐸𝐼 −5
Therefore, the joint rotations at B and C are
17𝑃𝐿2 5𝑃𝐿2
𝐷1 = , 𝐷2 = −
112𝐸𝐼 112𝐸𝐼
13
The Stiffness Method
Illustration case 2
8 −6 0
𝑃 −2𝐿 𝐸𝐼 4𝐿 0
𝐀ML = 𝐀MD = 2
8 4 𝐿 6 6
𝐿 4𝐿 2𝐿
8 −6 0 5
2
𝑃 −2𝐿 𝐸𝐼 4𝐿 0 𝑃𝐿 17 𝑃 20𝐿
𝐀M = + 2 =
8 4 𝐿 6 6 112𝐸𝐼 −5 56 64
𝐿 4𝐿 2𝐿 36𝐿
14
The Stiffness Method
Illustration case 2
4 6 0
𝑃 𝐿 𝐸𝐼 2𝐿 0
𝐀RL = 𝐀RD = 2
4 6 𝐿 0 6
−2 −6 −6
4 6 0 107
2
𝑃 𝐿 𝐸𝐼 2𝐿 0 𝑃𝐿 17 𝑃 31𝐿
𝐀R = + 2 =
4 6 𝐿 0 6 112𝐸𝐼 −5 56 69
−2 −6 −6 −64
15
The Stiffness Method
Application Example 1
Consider the beam shown, having all members with the same flexural rigidity EI.
Carry out the analysis of the beam using the stiffness method. As a part of the
analysis, determine the member end-actions (V and M) at the left end of member
AB and at the left end of member BC. Additionally, determine the reactions at
supports B and C. Take wL = P and M = PL.
16
The Stiffness Method
Application Example 1 2
𝑃𝐿 𝑤 1.5𝐿 𝑃𝐿
𝐴𝐷𝐿1 =− + =
Vector ADL 8 12 16
2
𝑤 1.5𝐿 𝑤𝐿2 5𝑃𝐿
𝐴𝐷𝐿2 =− + =−
12 12 48
𝑃𝐿 3
⇒ 𝐴𝐷𝐿 =
48 −5
17
The Stiffness Method
Application Example 1 Vectors AML and ARL 𝑃
2
𝑃𝐿 8
8 𝑃 2𝐿
𝐀ML = 3𝑤𝐿 =
16 12
4 3𝐿
3𝑤𝐿2
16
3𝑃 3𝑤𝐿
+ 𝑃 9
𝐴𝑅𝐿 = 2 4 =
5𝑤𝐿 4 5
4
18
The Stiffness Method
Application Example 1 Stiffness, reaction and end-action coefficients
10𝐸𝐼 8𝐸𝐼
−
𝐴𝑅𝐷 = 3𝐿2 3𝐿2 = 2𝐸𝐼 −5 4
8𝐸𝐼 10𝐸𝐼 3𝐿2 −4 5
− 2
3𝐿 3𝐿2
19
The Stiffness Method
Application Example 1 Stiffness, reaction and end-action coefficients:
6𝐸𝐼
0
𝐿2
2𝐸𝐼 9 0
0 2𝐸𝐼 3𝐿 0
𝐴𝑀𝐷 = 𝐿 = 2
8𝐸𝐼 8𝐸𝐼 3𝐿 4 4
3𝐿2 3𝐿2 4𝐿 2𝐿
8𝐸𝐼 4𝐸𝐼
3𝐿 3𝐿
20
The Stiffness Method
Application Example 1
4𝐸𝐼 5 1 𝑃𝐿 3
𝐒= 𝐀𝐷𝐿 =
3𝐿 1 5 48 −5
0
𝐀𝐷 =
Solve for displacements −𝑃𝐿
𝐀𝐷 = 𝐀𝐷𝐿 + 𝐒𝐃 ⇒ 𝐃 = 𝐒 −1 𝐀𝐷 − 𝐀𝐷𝐿
3𝐿 1 5 −1 0 𝑃𝐿 3 𝑃𝐿2 7
𝐃= − =
4𝐸𝐼 23 −1 5 −𝑃𝐿 48 −5 384𝐸𝐼 −53
Therefore, the joint rotations at B and C are
7𝑃𝐿2 53𝑃𝐿2
𝐷1 = , 𝐷2 = −
384𝐸𝐼 384𝐸𝐼
21
The Stiffness Method
Application Example 1
8 9 0
𝑃 2𝐿 2𝐸𝐼 3𝐿 0
𝐀ML = 𝐀MD = 2
16 12 3𝐿 4 4
3𝐿 4𝐿 2𝐿
8 9 0 351
2
𝑃 2𝐿 2𝐸𝐼 3𝐿 0 𝑃𝐿 7 𝑃 93𝐿
𝐀M = + 2 =
16 12 3𝐿 4 4 384𝐸𝐼 −53 576 248
3𝐿 4𝐿 2𝐿 30𝐿
22
The Stiffness Method
Application Example 1
𝑃 9 2𝐸𝐼 −5 4
𝐀RL = 𝐀RD = 2
4 5 3𝐿 −4 5
𝑃𝐿2 7
𝐃=
Solve for support reactions 384𝐸𝐼 −53
𝐀R = 𝐀RL + 𝐀RD 𝐃;
2
𝑃 9 2𝐸𝐼 −5 4 𝑃𝐿 7 𝑃 1049
𝐀R = + 2 =
4 5 3𝐿 −4 5 384𝐸𝐼 −53 576 427
23
The Stiffness Method
Application Example 2
Consider the plane truss shown, having each member i inclined at angle γi, with
length Li, self-weight wi, and axial rigidity EAi. Carry out an analysis of the truss
using the stiffness method. As a part of the analysis, determine the member end-
actions at ends A, B, C, and D.
To start with,
𝑃1
𝐀𝐷 =
𝑃2
24
The Stiffness Method
Application Example 2 For each member,
𝑤𝑖 𝐿𝑖
Vector ADL 𝐴𝐷𝐿1 = 0; 𝐴𝐷𝐿2 =
2
0 0
⇒ 𝐴𝐷𝐿 = 𝑤 𝐿 𝑤 𝐿 𝑤 𝐿 𝑤 𝐿 = 𝑊
1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4
+ + +
2 2 2 2 2
End-actions for
restrained truss member
25
The Stiffness Method
Application Example 2 𝑤𝑖 𝐿𝑖
For each member, 𝐴𝑀𝐿𝑖 = sin 𝛾𝑖
2
Vector AML
End-actions for
restrained truss member
26
The Stiffness Method
Application Example 2
Stiffness and end-action coefficients
27
The Stiffness Method
Application Example 2 Stiffness and end-action coefficients
Member stiffnesses
for a plane truss
member
28
The Stiffness Method
Application Example 2 Stiffness and end-action coefficients
29
The Stiffness Method
Application Example 2
Now, let P1 = 0, P2 = −P, wL = P/10; EA, L is constant, and
0
then, 𝐀𝐷 =
−𝑃
𝐀M = 𝐀ML + 𝐀MD 𝐃 =
𝐃 = 𝐒 −1 𝐀𝐷 − 𝐀𝐷𝐿 =
30
Formalization of The Stiffness Method
Formalization Requirements
• As done with the flexibility method, it is important to formalize the
application of the stiffness method for efficient analysis processes.
• Although the formalized approach is not computationally efficient, the
materials offer a good background for the more direct method of assembling
the stiffness matrix, leading to the development of a ‘computer-oriented direct
stiffness method’.
• We start again with the development of stiffness matrix for an individual
member of a framed structural system.
• Additionally, the previous definition of the member-oriented axis (local
coordinates) system (xM, yM, zM) for an individual member, and the structure-
oriented axis (global coordinates) system (x, y, z) for the entire framed
structure, remains the same here.
31
Formalization of The Stiffness Method
Stiffnesses of Prismatic Members (Beam)
Recall …
32
Formalization of The Stiffness Method
Stiffnesses of Prismatic Members (Truss)
Recall …
33
Formalization of The Stiffness Method
Stiffnesses of Prismatic Members (Plane frame)
34
Formalization of The Stiffness Method
Stiffnesses of Prismatic Members (Grid)
35
Formalization of The Stiffness Method
Stiffnesses of Prismatic Members (Space frame)
36
The Formalized Stiffness Method
The main idea of the formalization process is to relate the member stiffnesses in the
local system to the global system along with the global-level joint actions and
displacements. For an individual member,
‘Unassembled’
structural
stiffness
37
The Formalized Stiffness Method
This equation presents the member-oriented action equation, relating the vector
AM, a collection of local (or member-oriented) end actions to the displacement
through the unassembled structural stiffness SM.
There is a need to transform the vector DM to the global system through a
transformation operator CMJ. Thus,
The joint displacement vector DJ, joint stiffness matrix SJ, and action vector AJ
can all be partitioned into components pertaining to free (unknown) joint
displacements DF (or k-redundants) and restrained (known) displacements DR as
⇒
39
The Formalized Stiffness Method
For a complete analysis, it is required to evaluate the member end actions AM
and the support reactions AR.
Note the inclusion of the combined (equivalent and actual) loads ARC applied
directly at supports. It is also important to note the inclusion of the member
fixed end actions AML, a vector of fixed-end actions due to loads applied to the
members.
40
The Formalized Stiffness Method
Application Example 1
The two-span continuous beam shown is subjected to a uniform load w = 4P/L in
span AB and two concentrated forces P in span BC. Both members have the same
length L, but the flexural rigidity of member AB is twice that of member BC. There
is an upward support displacement δ at B. Carry out a complete analysis of the
beam using the formalized stiffness approach.
41
The Formalized Stiffness Method
Application Example 1
(i) Restrained structure, equiv. joint loads & displacements (ii) Unassembled joint stiffness
42
The Formalized Stiffness Method
Application Example 1
43
The Formalized Stiffness Method
Application Example 1
(iv) Assembled joint stiffness; k-redundants
44
The Formalized Stiffness Method
Application Example 1
(v) Support reactions
45
The Formalized Stiffness Method
Application Example 1
(vi) Member end actions
46
The Formalized Stiffness Method
Application Example 2
Using the formalized stiffness approach, analyze the plane truss shown for the
vertical load and the horizontal support displacements. Members 1 through 4 have
equal cross-sectional areas equal to A, while each of members 5 and 6 has cross-
sectional areas equal to 2 𝐴 . For the analysis, selectively determine only the
horizontal reactions at B.
47
The Formalized Stiffness Method
Application Example 2 (ii) Unit values of joint displacements; compatibility matrix
49
The Formalized Stiffness Method
Application Example 2
0
(iv) Support reactions
0
(v) Member end actions
50
The Formalized Stiffness Method
Application Example 3
51
The Formalized Stiffness Method
Application Example 3 (ii) Unit values of joint displacements; compatibility matrix
52
The Formalized Stiffness Method
Application Example 3
(iii) Assembled joint stiffness submatrix SFF; k-redundants
0 0
(iv) Member end actions
53