100% found this document useful (1 vote)
236 views3 pages

Marking Scheme Agri

The document outlines the structure and scoring criteria for a student project report on a technology-related production or post-production project. It provides details on the sections to be included such as introduction, methodology, results, discussion, conclusion and recommendations, as well as the marking scheme for each section based on the level of information and analysis provided. The marking scheme allocates a total of 40 marks for the technical report and 10 additional marks for a cost analysis comparing projected and actual income, expenditure, and surplus/shortfall.

Uploaded by

Da bert
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
236 views3 pages

Marking Scheme Agri

The document outlines the structure and scoring criteria for a student project report on a technology-related production or post-production project. It provides details on the sections to be included such as introduction, methodology, results, discussion, conclusion and recommendations, as well as the marking scheme for each section based on the level of information and analysis provided. The marking scheme allocates a total of 40 marks for the technical report and 10 additional marks for a cost analysis comparing projected and actual income, expenditure, and surplus/shortfall.

Uploaded by

Da bert
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

ITEM DESCRIPTOR MARKS

TOTAL AWARDE
D
Name of Student - -
Student Registration Number - -
Name of School - -
INTRODUCTION (6) Title of project - -
Start Date - -
Termination Date - -
Table of Contents - -
Provided a clear and accurate
Literature summary of literature reviewed 2
Review (3)
At least three reference cited in the 1
summary
Problem statement clearly written 1
Technical /technology related 1
objective addressing the production
Aim (2) and post-production levels
Income related 1
METHODOLOGY (11) Experimental Experimental design clearly 1
Design (2) described
Comparison of production 1
technology/ management practice/
value-addition technology
Materials 1
Materials and
Equipment (2) Tools and Equipment 1

Activities (production and processing) (4) 4

Data Collection- Data (at least 2 sets) and how it was 3


collected (3)
RESULTS (9) Presented and described data including performance 3
-PRODUCTION AND of value added products / comparison of value added
POST PRODUCTION and non-value added product where applicable (3)
VALUE ADDITION Interpreted results accurately (3) 3
(WHERE Presented results properly (2) 2
APPLICABLE) Labelled tables, charts (1) 1
DISCUSSION (8) How technical Provided a full discussion of results 1
results relate to
the issue (2) Relating results to literature 1
accurately with reference.
Effect of Discussed the effect of technology 2
technology used during production/post-
used during production as it relates to value
production /
after Addition as it relates to supporting
production/ for evidence and cited relevant
value addition literature
(2)
Effect of Fully discussed the effect of 2
technical / technical / technology on
technology on profitability and referring to
profitability (2) relevant data with supporting
evidence and cited relevant
literature
Overall findings Fully discussed the findings as it 2
as it relates to relates to the issue with supporting
the issue (2) evidence and cited relevant
literature
Conclusion, Based on outcomes with respect to 1
limitation & Conclusion (2) technical / technological aspects
Recommendations Based on outcomes and incomes 1
(4) aspect
Limitations (1) 1
Recommendations (1) 1
Presentation (2) Less than 5 spelling and grammatical errors contained 1
in the report (1)
At least 3 references properly cited (1) 1
TOTAL (Technical Report) 40 ÷ 2
= 20
Projected Income- 1
output, price, total
Complete Budget Projected Expenditure- 1
input, price, total

COST ANALYSIS Surplus/Shortfall 1


(10) correctly calculated
(Please tick which is
applicable) Income/sale of 1
produce- quantity,
price, total
1
(Production, post- Actual Income & Expenditure- quantity, 1
production) Expenditure price, total

Or Surplus/Shortfall 1
correctly calculated
2
(Production, Post-
production and value Provides a full and 4
Addition accurate comparison of
Comparison of all three parameters
Partially compares all 3 3
projected and actual parameters

-Income Correctly compares ant 2


two parameters
-Expenditure
Correctly compares 1
- Surplus/Shortfall only one parameter
Did not attempt to 0
compare any
parameter
TOTAL COST ANALYSIS 10

You might also like