Form 6 LIE Analyzing Prose
Form 6 LIE Analyzing Prose
Form 6 LIE Analyzing Prose
Plot
Point of View
Character
Setting
Theme
Language
Author’s style/technique
PLOT
Plot is different from Story. The story is a chronological sequence (arranged in time) of events/episodes.
The plot of a story need not be chronologically sequenced. The plot can rearrange the elements of the story such that (for instance) the
end is narrated before the beginning. In such an instance, the plot uses the device of flashback. To give another example, in a detective
tale, the initial action in the story is not disclosed to the reader until nearly the end, thereby producing the element of suspense.
The plot explores the causal connection (the link of cause to effect) between the episodes of a story.Irony, Suspense, Coincidence, are
some features of Plot.
E.M. Forster illustrated the difference between Plot and Story thus:
Story: The King died, and then the Queen died. (The question that propels the story forward is what happened next?)
Plot: The King died, and then the Queen died of grief.(The question addressed by the plot is why/how is the second event caused by
the first?)
What are the constituents of Plot?
Exposition/Introduction is the information needed to understand what will happen during the time frame of a story. It usually consists
of background information.
Climax or crisis is the turning point in the story that occurs when characters try to resolve the complication.
Resolutionis the tying up of the loose ends of the story, the ending or outcome.
Epiphany: a moment of startling, sudden insight gained by the main character as a result of the unfolding of events in the story
Questions to ask:
1) Why did the author arrange the story elements the way she did? What effect did she wish the story to produce?
2) How does the plot control our emotional response and prepare us for reversals or surprises?
POINT OF VIEW
Who tells the story? The teller of a story is the narrator, who is not to be confused with the author.
In fiction, who tells the story and how s/he tells it are critical issues that determine the interpretation of the story. The tone and feel of
the story, and even its meaning, can change depending on who the narrator is.
The narrator can either show or tell. In the former case, s/he has the characters speak in their own voices, without any narrative
mediation. In the latter, the narrator reports the events to the reader and thereby possesses greater control over the interpretation of the
story.
Is the narrator trustworthy? The credibility of the story will depend on the (perceived) reliability of the narrator. The narrator could be
either objective (detached) or subjective (biased). An objective narrator’s tale is more readily believed than that of a subjective
narrator.
Third Person Point of View - Here the narrator does not participate in the action of the story as one of the characters, but lets us
know about the events and characters. This is an outside voice.
First Person Point of View - Here the narrator does participate in the action of the story. S/he is one of the characters in the story, an
inside voice. When reading stories in the first person, we need to realise that what the narrator is recounting might not be the objective
truth. For instance, a first person narrator might try to justify her action as she wishes to present herself in a favourable light to the
reader. The trustworthiness of the recounting is thus an issue.
Omniscient and Limited Omniscient Points of View - A narrator who knows everything about all the characters is all-knowing, or
omniscient. A narrator whose knowledge is limited to one character, either major or minor, has a limited omniscient point of view.
Questions to ask:
1) How does the point of view affect your response to the story, to the characters and the theme?
3) Are the plot and the point-of-view of the story linked? If so, how?
CHARACTER
Characters are either major or minor, and either static (unchanging) or dynamic (changing).
Protagonist - the leading character; the main character. Antagonist - the force acting against the main character.
Flat character - a one-dimensional representation, a stereotype
Round character - a multi-dimensional representation, someone who can convince in a surprising manner
Dynamic character - one that changes or grows from beginning to end
Static character - one that never changes or grows from beginning to end
Readers can learn about characters in many ways, including:
Physical traits, Dialogue, Actions, Attire, Opinions, Point of view
Since a short story aims for brevity, a round character is usually revealed/disclosed rather than developed in the course of the plot.
SETTING
The location of a story's action, along with the time in which it occurs, is the setting. Setting can add an important dimension of
meaning, reflecting character and embodying theme. Setting could even be symbolic, in the use, for instance, of pathetic fallacy.
THEME
The theme of a fable is its moral. The theme of a parable is its teaching. The theme of a piece of fiction is its view about life and how
people behave, the narrator’s vision.The writer's task is to communicate on a common ground with the reader.
Questions to ask:
2) Are there repeating patterns and symbols in the story? Sometimes these lead you to the theme.
An author’s writing style is not incidental, superficial, or supplementary: style identifies how ideas are embodied in language. In other
words, the effect of how an author uses words and literary elements is important for understanding the meaning of a text.
An author’s writing style includes all of the items on the list below, including specific word choice (diction), kind of tone, use of
formal or informal language, etc.
The author adopts a variety of style elements depending on his or her purpose, audience, and genre. Analyzing an author's style
involves understanding the particular way a text is written. Style in writing is not what is said but how it is said. Analyzing an author's
style involves analyzing the writer's unique way of communicating ideas. Styles in writing are created deliberately by the author to
convey a specific mood or effect.
Style is often aligned with pathos, since its figures of speech are often employed to persuade through emotional appeals. However,
style has just as much to do with ethos, for an author’s style often establishes or mitigates one's authority and credibility. But it should
not be assumed, either, that style simply adds on a pathetic or ethical appeal to the core, logical content. Style is very much part of the
appeal through logos (appeal to logic and reason), especially considering the fact that schemes of repetition (e.g. outlines) serve to
produce coherence and clarity, which are attributes of the appeal to reason. In other words, most pieces of writing have all three
appeals (pathos, ethos, logos), but one or the other may be more dominate depending on the purpose of the piece of writing.
WHAT DO I DO NOW?
In order to analyze a piece of writing, go through this list to evaluate how an author is using these styles elements. Then, choose which
ones are most dominate in a particular piece that will help you to interpret the meaning of the piece, which is ultimately the entire
point of doing a close evaluation of a piece of writing.
1. Vocabulary/word choice: Are the words simple or fancy? Long/short, simple/complex, many modifiers/few modifiers? Are
they technical, flowery, colloquial, formal, cerebral, lively, exciting, vivid, etc? Use of dialect, standard, non-standard English?
Does the text or this passage make use of shocking, taboo language? Does the author pile on the details? Does author use slang
or jargon specific to the topic? For example, does the writer utilize sports jargon to describe non-sports things, people, events,
or places? Or military jargon to describe non-military things, people and/or places? How does the author’s word choice
contribute to the message?
2. Point of view: Who is telling the story? Is the novel or this passage written in first person (I, we, us) or second person (you,
your), or third person point of view? If it’s third person point of view, is it limited or omniscient? Is the narrator reliable? Does
the point of view alternate to impact the way the text is read?
3. Is there dialogue, monologue, or reported speech? Dialogue is a conversation between two or more people. It is essential to
fiction writing, and some types of nonfiction.
4. Sentence Structure: What is distinctive about the sentences in this passage of writing? Are the sentences long or short? Do
they contain many subordinate clauses or are they often fragments? Are there any digressions or interruptions? Is the word-
order straightforward or unusual? Are the sentences short and punchy?
5. Figures of speech: Are there any metaphors, similes, analogies, hyperbole, understatement, personification and/or symbols?
Any other use of figurative language? Use of sensory details through imagery?
6. Flashbacks: Does the author use flashbacks? A flashback is an interruption to the narrative that presents an earlier episode.
Flashbacks move a story back in time giving readers insights about characters they don’t know well. Used effectively,
flashbacks enhance the emotional movement of a story, deepen the story’s imagery, and organize a story by weaving
information into the narrative at critical times.
7. Structure: What’s interesting about how the author constructs the literary work? Are there flashbacks (see above), flash
forwards, literary montage, vignettes, journals? Is the work chronological? What specific form is used in structuring the
narrative? How does this form impact the way one reads the work? Does it contribute to the overall meaning or message of the
work? Definition for montage: “a literary, musical, or artistic composite of juxtaposed more or less heterogeneous elements.”
8. Characters: A character is what he does. How does the author characterize the people in his novel? Characterization is the
presentation of character, whether by direct description, by showing the character in action, or by the presentation of other
characters that help define each other.
9. Allusions: How often and how does the author refer to other texts, myths, symbols, famous figures, historical events,
quotations, and so on?
10. Sound devices: Use of alliteration, onomatopoeia, rhythm, rhyme, and/or repetition?
11. Does the writer use any of the following: Puns, euphemisms, archaic language, affixation, ambiguity, idiom, clichés, stream
of consciousness, phonological features, foreign words, nonsense words, anecdotes, didactic, satire, vernacular, sarcasm,
disclaimers, footnotes...?
12. Paragraph structure: Are the paragraphs very short, or are there enormous blocks running across many pages? Are the
paragraphs indented or flush left?
13. Irony: Is there a use of irony? In situational irony, expectations aroused by a situation are reversed; in cosmic irony or the
irony of fate, misfortune is the result of fate, chance, or God; in dramatic irony, the audience knows more than the characters
in the play/film, so that words and action have additional meaning for the audience.
14. Rhetorical strategies: Has the rhetor appealed to pathos and/or logos? In what way has the rhetor established his or her ethos?
Is there a rhetorical use of humor? An appeal to an authority? The use of a logical fallacy?
15. Tone (the writer’s implied relationship to the reader and the subject matter): What is the author’s attitude? Does the
author seem sarcastic? Remorseful? Fearful? Condescending? Praising? Critical/satirical? Wistful? Pessimistic? Academic?
Philosophically detached? Hopeful? Bitter? Sad? Intimate/distant? Angry/calm? Informative/entertaining? Humorous/serious?
Ironic/literal? Passionately involved/aloof? Is the tone consistent or does it shift? What feeling is evoked in the reader by the
language used by the author? What type of tone shifts exist that impact meaning?
16. Most importantly, how do all of these elements create meaning? What does the passage mean and how does it
contribute to the meaning of the piece of writing?
Always clarify with adjectives—for example, do not write “the author uses diction,” write “the author uses understated
diction,” or “industrial imagery,” or “chronological organization,” etc. If you write that the author uses diction, this is just
stating the obvious. If diction is word choice, then everything ever written--ever!--uses diction. No piece of writing can exist
without choosing words to use. You must clarify WHAT KIND of word choice the author has used, which is the whole point of
analyzing the piece of writing. The word choice often determines a clue to the meaning of the piece.
Always, always explain with specific examples from the text.
Do not use specific examples until your have made a general assertion, usually in a topic sentence of a body paragraph. For
example, write: The author establishes the unsettling tone of this passage with detailed description. Then, provide the
examples.
Do not praise the author or personally comment on the quality or validity of the content of the piece. In other words, never use
these kinds of words: great, excellent, etc.
Do not use first or second person. Stay in the formal third person point of view. (At least in academic writing for this course as
you are learning to write in an objective, academic way at the college level).
Try to avoid stale or inaccurate verbs. Do not use “this shows,” or “this tells the reader…” Use active verbs, such as
“connotes,” “emphasizes,” and “relates.”
Avoid using "the reader" as a crutch (unless specifically addressing audience as a style element).
Do not be overly general in any part of the essay. The more specific, the better is a great rule of thumb for all writing.
No overly general "funnel" introductions (always be as specific as possible in an introduction--get straight to the point or you
are just using filler), or preachy conclusions (always use facts and appeal to logos in academic writing).
Do not use truisms (Down through history, there have always been the poor), quotes as openers, or “hooks.” Simply state your
point in a straightforward way. When in doubt, start with the thesis statement. Or, you can start with introducing the author and
the context of the work, but do not waste more than a paragraph on summary or background--and do this only if needed. In
most cases, you should assume that the person reading your analysis has actually read the piece you are analyzing. (At least for
now as you are learning to write college-level, academic analysis.)
Do not merely paraphrase or summarize passages; you must analyze the use of stylistic devices in a passage. You may need to
include enough details so that what you are writing makes sense, but assume that the person reading your analysis did read the
piece of writing that you are analyzing. (Again, at least in the context of this course as you are learning college-level, academic
writing.)
Narrative Techniques:
They were three yards from the main road. A man appeared out of the dark and stood in front of them. It was the same man
Donna had seen earlier. He was blocking the path. Joel started to go around. The man took his hand from behind his back. He had a
gun.
“Hol’ on bwoy, wehyutinkyugwine?” The man looked at her. He pointed to the black canvas bag slung over her shoulder.
“Drop de bag!” he said. She dropped the bag. “De two of yu turn rounan walk back de same way yu come. Don’t run me
right behin’ yuan de gun ‘ave bullet in it.”
“Wait a min,” Joel said.
“Yu no hear wha mi say!” the man shouted, waving the gun. Donna stood rigid. Joel turned her around and piloted her back
in the direction they had come.
Halfway down the path the man ordered them to stop. He carried the bag Donna had dropped previously. He opened it and
dashed the contents on the ground. A dog-eared book, make-up and a brush.
“Weh de money?”
“Boy de dawta only have whayu see ina de bag an all I have is a two dolla but de man welcome to it still.” Donna heard Joel’s
voice. She was standing right behind him and all she heard was a voice, the words made no impression on her brain at all. The man
was speaking now. She watched the gun.
“How yu mean yu don’ ave no money, a nice, clear skin gal like dat? Wha she a do wid a black bwoy like yu anyway. Gimme
de money, man!”
“Mi not lying to de man, star. Mi don’ have no money, yu can search mi if yu want.”
Donna was afraid. Her lungs were aching. She kept seeing the picture hanging on the wall above the bed in her room. She
was shaking. Why didn’t Joel shut up? The man was going to shoot them, couldn’t he see that? She wanted to pray but she couldn’t
think straight.
“Oh so yu don’ ‘avenottin’. Well we mus get something. Come yah gal!”
Her legs shook violently. She was sweating. She stood still, eyes on the gun.
“Whayu name gal? Speak!” The man shouted at her. She opened her mouth. Her throat was clamped tight. She moved her
lips. There was no sound.
Extract from Walking Home
Taken from Facing The Sea.
Plot Development:
The author uses the device of suspense to move the plot forward. The antagonist’s threatening words and gestures tell us that he has no
good intention for the two characters. The complication in the plot occurs when the antagonist produces the gun and threatens Donna
and Joel. His sinister claim that, ‘…we mus get something’, tells us that he means to harm Donna. The suspense continues to build
when the villain leads the characters to an isolated place and aggressively demands money. His determination to get ‘something’
suggests that he will go to further lengths to be satisfied.
The plot is probable as criminal activities have escalated in the Caribbean setting. The reader can empathize with the characters, and in
this way the author can control his emotional response. The reader feels Donna’s fear and even the criminal’s antagonism. The
feelings grow stronger as the plot unfolds and the threat to both Donna and Joel increases.
Point of View:
The story is told from the perspective of the third person narrator. The narrator is not involved in the action of the plot, however he is
able to give us a clear picture of the characters’ feelings and motives. The narrator ‘shows’ the story as the charactersspeak in their
own voice through the use of direct speech. There is very little narrative mediation, so the characters’ words move the plot along.
The third person narrative perspective makes the story more credible. It also provides enough distance from the incident that the
reader is not totally overwhelmed by the action. The reader does feel Donna’s terror though because the narrator is able to describe her
inner turmoil through her thoughts.
Character: The extract shows interaction among three characters – Donna, Joel and the antagonist. Donna is seen as the terrified
victim. She says the least in the extract, however the narrator does reveal her inner thoughts and turmoil. Her actions reveal her terror
and her inability to cope with the situation. She is paralyzed with fear and her confused thoughts clearly reflect this.
Joel however demonstrates a more balanced response to the situation. He engages the antagonist in dialogue in an attempt to keep the
situation neutral. This shows that he is street smart and more experienced than Donna. His ability to converse with the antagonist on
his level [the use of the creole] also shows this. He makes constant attempts to keep the antagonist calm.
The antagonist fits the stereotype of the villain. He is aggressive and his speech helps to characterize him. It suggests that he is
uneducated and his desperate attempt to attain money could suggest he is poor. He is a sinister character who threatens Donna and
Joel. The extract ends on a note which suggests his intentions for Donna. His racist, discriminatory comment also tells us about him.
He is a man who is governed by race and class distinction, so that it is not clear to him why ‘a clear skin gyul’ would like a ‘black
bwoy’. His statement, ‘Well we must get something’, shows his sense of entitlement.
Setting:
The action of the plot unfolds in a public forum. The story begins with the characters heading to a public street; however when the
antagonist is introduced he moves them to a more secluded area. This provides the right setting for the robbery attempt and ultimate
physical abuse of the character. The deserted setting suits a crime scene. The setting also helps to create the tense mood of the extract.
The reader senses that something sinister will occur and the setting heightens that awareness.
Theme:
The extract deals with the issues of violence and fear and race/discrimination. The writer depicts the violence of crime and the effect it
has on the victim. He shows how individuals behave as victim or criminal. Donna is paralyzed with fear, Joel’s focus is on surviving
and the antagonist is determined to take whatever he can. The reader can identify with this theme as criminal activity continues to
escalate. The writer also looks at race/discrimination. The antagonist introduces this theme when he suggests that Donna and Joel are a
mismatch because of their race. The reader can identify with this theme as this view of life is still seen in the society.
A.
Your first concern should be the ‘world’ of the work. Seek answers to the following questions:
1. In what kind of community does the action occur?
2. What are the customs, beliefs, and values of the community?
3. What is sacred in this society and what is held in scorn?
4. What forms of behaviour and response are expected from those who live within its boundaries?
B.
You need to analyze the personalities of the characters. You need to examine their relationships with each other and their actions and
thoughts in response to the demands of these relationships and to the demands of the community. You should seek to determine the
motives of their actions. Bt analyzing your characters closely you should try if possible, to arrive at a conception of the author’s
purpose in writing the story and view of the world he has created.
C.
Every work of fiction has a narrator. When a story is told in the first person, it is clear that the narrator is not the author and may or
may not be presenting the author’s view. But when the story is told in the third person, it becomes a problem to learn who is telling the
story. The narrator maybe the author but often is not and there is danger of misinterpretation in ascribing to the author the views and
attitudes of the narrator. You will need to study carefully the manner in which he moves into the minds of the characters, the kinds of
comments he makes about their thoughts and action. You will need also to ascertain whether the narrator is a character in the story or
an external observer and recorder.
Things to look at when characterizing: (i) physical appearance; (ii) movements; (iii) speech; (iv) actions; (v) occupations; (vi)
facial expressions; (vii) mimicry.
1. The first and most familiar world is that of everyday experience. The stories you will read will concern themselves with family
life, birth, growth, love, marriage, age, death, school, moments of excitement, heroism and cowardice.
2. A second world is the world of economic extremes, the kind of world most of us look at from the outside, the world of great
power and wealth, the world of soul starving poverty. The people who live in these worlds face many of the everyday
problems of the everyday world. They too are concerned with family loyalties, but with a difference. They live with greater
tensions and the climaxes of their lives tend to be more dramatic. The values that motivate the rich and powerful and the ones
that rule the lives of the poor and exploited are similar to those that operate in the everyday world, but arrogance of the rich an
necessity among the poor will lead them more readily to flaunt these values and produce more dramatic outcomes. In addition
among the rich there are the problems of snobbery and boredom and among the poor the devastating problems of hunger,
work, misery and anguish.
3. A third world is the dramatic one in which the malignant forces of nature or innate evil in human beings turns the universe into
a battle ground for survival.
4. A fourth world is the ‘sick’ world. The stories deal with people and places gone awry. The atmosphere and the action are ugly,
weird, strange, supernatural, shocking. The people are maladjusted, perverted, insane, suicidal, retarded. It is the world of
idiots, drug addicts, pimps, prostitutes, sexual perverts, criminals and lunatics.
5. The fifth world is the world of fantasy. It is an unreal world in which dreams unattainable in the real world are often fulfilled.
Everything is possible in a world of fantasy. Strange and wonderful, strange and terrible things can happen in a world of
fantasy.
In the shamba he felt hollow. There were no crops on the land and what with the dried-up weeds , gakaraku, micege,
mikengeria, bangi – the sun, the country appeared sick and dull. The jembe seemed heavier than usual; the unfinished part of the
shamba looked too big for his unwilling muscles. He dug a little, and feeling the desire to pass water, walked to a hedge near the path;
why had Warui, Githua and the women behaved that way towards him? He found his bladder had pressed him into false urgency. A
few drops trickled down and he watched them as if each drop fascinated him. Two young women dressed for church, passed near, saw
a big man playing with his thing and giggled. Mugo felt foolish and dragged himself back to his work.
He raised the jembe, let it fall into the soil; lifted it and again brought it down. The ground felt soft as if there were mole-
tunnels immediately below the surface. He could hear the soil, dry and hollow, tumble down. Dust flew into the sky, enveloped him,
then settled into his hair and clothes. Once a grain of dust went into his left eye. He quickly dropped the jembe in anger and rubbed
his eye which smarted with pain as water tossed out from both eyes. He sat down: where was the fascination he used to find in the soil
before the Emergency?
Mugo’s father and mother had died poor, leaving him an only child in the hands of a distant aunt. Waitherero was a widow
with six married daughters. When drunk, she would come home and remind Mugo of this fact.
‘Female slime,’ she would say, exposing her toothless gums; she would fix Mugo with a fierce glance, as if he and God had
conspired against her. ‘They don’t even come to see me – Do you laugh, you – what’s your penis worth? Oh God, see what an
ungrateful wretch is left on my hands. You would have followed your father to the grave, but for me. Remember that and stop
laughing.’
Another day she would complain that her money was missing.
‘I didn’t steal it,’ Mugo retorted, withdrawing.
‘There is only you and me in this house. I could not have stolen it. So who could have taken it?’
‘I am not a thief!’
‘Are you saying that I am telling lies? The money was here, you saw me bury it under this post. See the way he looks, he creeps
behind the goats.’
The more feeble she became, the more she hated him. Whatever he did or made, she would deride his efforts. So Mugo was
haunted by the image of his own inadequacy.
His one desire was to kill his aunt.
Mugo went home earlier than usual. He had not done much work, yet he was weary. He walked like a man who knows he is
followed or watched, yet does not want to reveal this awareness by his gait or behaviour. In the evening he heard footsteps outside.
Who could his visitor be? He opened the door. Suddenly the all-day mixture of feelings distilled into fear and animosity. Warui, the
elder led the group. Standing beside him was Wambui, one of the women from the river. She now smiled, exposing a missing line of
teeth in her lower jaw. The third man was Gikonyo, who had married Kihika’s sister.
Analyze the above extract using the key points given above.