Chapter 3
Chapter 3
Chapter 3
DIVERSITY
- Canada was the first country in the world to adopt multiculturalism as an offcial policy, thereby
affirming the value and dignity of all citizens regardless of their ethinic origins, language, or
religious beliefs.
- Valuing differences helps to minimize discrimination, which occurs when job candidates or
employees experience differential treatment based on charateritics unrelated to work performance
such as gender, ethnicity, or religious beliefs.
Increases an organization’s access to the widest possible pool of skills, abilities, and ideas.
Help companies innovate more effectively, address diverse customer needs more appropriately,
and have other positive benefits.
Differences among people can lead to miscommunication, misunderstanding and conflict.
I/ DIVERSITY IN THE CANADIAN CONTEXT: MULTICULTURALISM AS A GUIDING
PRINCIPLE AND FORMAL POLICY
- Multiculturalism Act include:
1. Formal statements of support for the maintenance of languages other than Canada’s two official
languages.
2. Mandating programs and practices that enhance community participation for all citizens.
3. Mandating programs and practices that enhance understanding and respect for diversity
4. Requiring the collection of statistical data measuring the outcomes of these initiatives.
- Multiculturalism as a policy ensures that all citizens can maintain their identities, acknowledge
and celebrate their ancestry, and still have a sense of belonging in Canada.
It encourages harmony and cross-cultural understanding and supports efforts to integrate all
citizens and enable them to take an active part in Canada’s social, cultural, economic, and
political affairs
Multiculturalism has led to a higher percentage of newcomers eventually becoming Canadian
citizens.
- Some critics claim that it encourages people to focus on their differences rather than their
similarities
- The latter critics state that in practice multiculturalism has focused on things like festivals while
failing to address underlying systemic barriers to true cross-cultural acceptance and inclusion.
II/ DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE WORKFORCE
- Today, that changes is well under way and progress continues, although things are certainly not
FULLY EQUAL YET.
- The substantial progress so far is increasingly reflected in the makeup of managerial and
professional jobs; women in particular have made progress moving into many (but not all) of
these prestigious roles.
Labour market participation is also EQUALIZING OVER TIME.
- Gender-based employment discrimination has not been COMPLETELY ELIMINATED.
o The degree to which women are UNDERPAID and UNDERREPRESENTED in certain
types of occupations and how much progress they have made over the years.
o Women today are more likely to be employed full time, have an advanced education,
occupy positions of authority, and earn wages closer to those of men.
- While other groups continue to experience labour market DISADVANTAGES, their employment
rates indicate ongoing improvement to diversity levels in the workplace.
This shift toward a diverse workforce means Canadian organizations need to make diversity
management a central component of their policies and practices.
- The aging of the workforces is consistently one of the most significant concerns of HR managers,
along with the loss of skills resulting from the retirement of many baby boomers, increased
medical costs, and the need to enhance cross-cultural understanding.
- Other issues include increased global competition for talent and the complexity of meeting legal
HR requirements.
III/ LEVELS OF DIVERSITY
- Demographics mostly reflect SURFACE-LEVEL DIVERSITY, not thoughts and feelings, and
can lead employees to perceive one another through stereotypes and assumptions.
- Evidence has shown that as people get to know one another, they become less concerned about
demographic differences if they see themselves in terms of more important characteristics, such
as personality and values, the represent DEEP-LEVEL DIVERSITY.
- Since these types of differences tend to go unrecognized, deep-level diversity can be responsible
for persistent conflicts and misunderstandings
o But it can also lead to profoundly different modes of thought that can heighten creativity
and innovation in team settings.
- EX:
o Luis and Carol are managers in one company
o Luis is a young Mexican who emigrated to Canada three years ago
o Carol is an older and raised in rural Manitoba
These coworkers may notice their surface-level differences in education, ethnicity, regional
background, and gender.
As they get to know one another, they may find they are both deeply committed to their families,
have a common way of thinking about important work problems, like to work collaboratively,
and are interested in international assignments in the future.
o Steve is highly introverted, prefers to avoid risks, solicits the opinions of others before
making decisions, and likes the office quite.
o Dave is extroverted, risk-seeking, and assertive, and likes an active, energetic work
environment.
Their surface-level similarity will not necessarily lead to positive interactions, because they have
fundamental, deep-level differences.
It will be a challenge for them to collaborate regularly at work, and they’ll have to make some
compromises to get things done together.
V/ CULTURE IDENTITY
- Cultural norms influence the workplace, sometimes resulting in clashes. Organizations must
ADAPT.
- Some cultures have a formalized attitude to hierarchy and power such that questioning one’s
leaders is seen as HIGHLY DISRESPECTFUL
o Organizational change initiatives that reply on collecting constructive criticism about
managerial practices from employees may pose a challenge in this environment.
A company seeking to be sensitive to the culture identities of its employees should look beyond
accommodating its majority groups and instead create as much as an individualized approach to
practices and norms as possible.
VI/ DISABILITY
- Employer provided accommodations can assist those individuals in their efforts to MAXIMIZE
their participation.
This change in perceptions of disability was part of a larger rights-based movement that included
calls for greater government oversight and enforcement of basic human rights.
- As perspectives on disability have evolved, numerous political resources have been devoted to
MAXIMIZING rates of labour force participation and the provision of employer sponsored
accommodations among workers with disabilities as one component of reaching equity goals.
The Charter PROHIBITS discrimination based on disability; the latter two both prohibit
discrimination and mandate reasonable accommodation.
- Exceptions to the “duty to accommodate” under human rights and equity legislation include
situations in which doing so creates undue hardship or when BONA FIDE OCCUPATIONAL
REQUIREMENTS (BFOR) are unable to be fulfilled which means that the position cannot be
modified without creating genuine safety risk
- The case Alberta Dairy Pool vs the Alberta Human Rights Commission established the following
criteria for undue hardship used to determine if an employer is required to provide a specific
accommodation, which have since been used more broadly in courts across the country:
o Excessive expenses will incurred.
o It will disrupt existing collective agreements
o It will create morale problems with other employees
o The employer has highly interchangeable workforce/facilities
o The employer has a very small operation
o The employer has legitimate safety concerns.
- Common accommodations for mental, sensory, and psychiatric disabilities include being able to
work in a quiet, private workspace without distractions (for people with attention deficit
disorder), scheduling flexibility, social accommodation (creating understanding among coworkers
about communication-style differences associated with autism), and darkened rooms (as
sensitivity to florescent lighting is a common side effect of medications taken for mood disorders
and schizophrenia)
- Another review suggested workers with disabilities receive higher performance evaluations;
however, it also found that individuals with disabilities ten to encounter lower performance
expectations and are less likely to be hired.
Workers with psychiatric disabilities in particular experience very high levels of discrimination
and are often stereotyped as unpredictable and violent
This occurs despite the fact that violence is not typical of psychiatric conditions such as
depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia-contrary to the media-driven stereotype
reinforced on crime shows
Psychiatric conditions are treatable and people who have them can be fully engaged, productive
workers.
VII/ RELIGION
- The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Act PROHIBIT employers
from discriminating against employees on the basis of their religion
- Experiences range from having skills discounted and being denied interviews to social exclusion
and spurious safety complaints as a result of wearing HIJABS.
o Although all religious attire was included, the widespread public opinion was that this
represented an attack on the HIJABS and MUSLIM women in particular.
o This incident highlights the need for ongoing protection of religious freedoms in our
multicultural society.
- Religious individuals may also feel they have an obligation to express their beliefs in the
workplace.
VIII/ ABILITY
- Everyone has strengths and weaknesses that make him or her relatively superior or inferior to
others in performing certain tasks or activities.
- From management’s standpoint, the issue is NOT whether people differ in term of their abilities.
- They clearly do => The issue is using the acknowledge that people differ to increase the
likelihood an employee will perform her job well.
- ABILITY: An individual’s current capacity to perform the various tasks in a job. Overall abilities
are essentially made up of two sets of factors: intellectual and physical