Cost Benefit Analysis Project
Cost Benefit Analysis Project
Cost Benefit Analysis Project
by
CHINTA SHRIYA
Register No.41410060
SATHYABAMA
INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
(DEEMED TO BE UNIVERSITY)
Accredited with Grade “A” by NAAC I 12B Status by UGC I Approved by AICTE
JEPPIAAR NAGAR, RAJIV GANDHI SALAI, CHENNAI - 600 119
April 2023
SATHYABAMA
INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
(DEEMED TO BE UNIVERSITY)
Accredited with “A” grade by NAAC I 12B Status by UGC I Approved by AICTE
Jeppiaar Nagar, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Chennai – 600
119
www.sathyabama.ac.in
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that this Project Report is the bonafide work of CHINTA SHRIYA
41410060 who carried out the project entitled “A Study On Cost-Benefit
Analysis At Alloysys Extrusion Pvt Ltd” under my supervision from January
2023 to March 2023.
Dr. BHUVANESWARI .G
Dean – School of Management Studies
I CHINTA SHRIYA (41410060) hereby declare that the Project Report entitled “A
Study On Cost-Benefit Analysis At Alloysys Extrusion Pvt Ltd” done by me
under the guidance of Dr. John Paul .M is submitted in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the award of Master of Business Administration degree.
DATE:
I would like to express my sincere and deep sense of gratitude to my Project Guide Dr.
John Paul .M for her valuable guidance, suggestions and constant encouragement
paved way for the successful completion of my project work.
I wish to express my thanks to all Teaching and Non-teaching staff members of the
School of Management Studies who were helpful in many ways for the completion of
the project.
CHINTA SHRIYA
ABSTRACT
Cost-benefit Analysis is a statement of cost showing cost per unit of any product at
every level of production. It is important to know at what stage of production we are
and what price at the particular production stage. Cost of production includes
various factors from manufacturing to administration expenses. These variables
need to be given special care and attention by the company to bring about efficiency
in cash management. Hence the major objectives of the study undertaken were, to
analyse the cost at different stages of production, to assist in fixing of selling price,
to make a comparison of cost sheet with previous years and provide suitable
suggestions. .
The secondary data is chosen for the study on Cost-benefit Analysis. The data
were collected from various journals, websites and the annual report of Alloysys
Extrusion Pvt Ltd. The analytical research technique was adopted in this project.
The researcher used analytical type of research to analyze the past data based on
which certain future decision can be made. Data extracted from the annual report of
the company was analysed for cost with the help of cost overheads, administration
overheads, selling & distribution overheads in prime cost, direct material, labour and
expenses and inventory turnover ratio.
The factory overhead cost analyzed for the past five years shows an increasing
with normal trend. The prime cost of administration overhead indicates an increase
during the mid-period. The direct labor and expenses constantly stands at same
level of percentage with some differences. The study of the overall components of
cost has revealed that sales cost and profit ratio, the cost of production and cost of
sales is affecting the profit of the Alloysys Extrusion Pvt Ltd. Cost efficiency of the
company could be enhanced by reducing the cost of the production and cost of
sales.
CHAPTER – 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 INTRODUCTION:
Direct labor
Direct materials
Administrative overhead
Factory overhead
Direct expenses
Selling and distribution
The costs that are listed on cost sheet include labor cost and actual material cost
incurred. Anyway it is also possible that those costs are only listed in their standard
cost. The development of cost sheet is very important, typically if it is prepared by
hand.
The format of the cost sheet is typically a standard one that should be either setup
within the computer accounting system or manually rolled from past reports when
the report is printed. Another purpose of the cost sheet is that it can be used as the
support for the quote to a customer, basically to produce a custom product. In this
situation cost sheet includes the best prediction of the company’s prediction for the
requested product, with the details for each of the past indicated expense line items.
Advantage of Cost Sheet
Cost sheet indicates the breakup of the total cost by each elements like labor,
material, overhead etc.
Cost sheet facilitates the comparison of each costs in different years.
Cost sheet helps the management to fix the selling price.
Cost sheet can act as a guide to the management to formulate the production
policy.
It helps the management to have control over the cost of production
Direct Materials
In simple word, it is the material that is used during the production of a product and
it can be directly identified with the product. Other names for the direct material are
productive material, raw stock, store and raw materials. The cost of direct material
can be easily fount with the unit of production.
Step to estimate the Direct material cost
Identify the total amount goods to be produced. This is called as order size.
Estimate the total amount of raw material needed to produce the order size
Multiple that estimated amount by the cost related with the raw material.
If there is scrap or waste its cost should be included in the step three.
If the scrap or waste can be sold at scrap value, then this amount should be
deducted from the cost in the step four.
Direct Labour
Direct labour is the employees or workers who are directly involved in the production
process of goods. The cost which is assigned to a specific cost center or product is
known as direct labor cost. This includes
The cost of the fringes and wages given to the direct worker or employee.
The cost of the temporary helper who work directly on the production or
manufacturing process.
Factory Overhead
Other names for the factory overhead are work overhead and manufacturing
overhead. Factory overhead is the total cost involved in an operation of all
manufacturing facility in a production business that can’t be discovered directly to a
product. Factory overhead is usually applies to direct labour cost and indirect cost.
It include all the cost included in production excluding the cost of raw material.
Example: production supervisor salary, factory rent, depreciation, equipment setup
cost, factory utilities, fringe benefit etc.
Administration Overhead
It is the costs that are not involved in the production or development of goods or
services. Administration overhead is considered as a period cost. It means the
benefit of this kind of cost don’t carry forward into future periods. It is also known as
general overhead.
Example: office supplies, sales travel and entertainment, administration travel
expenses, salary and commission, wages etc.
These are the expenses that are normally incurred to enhance the service and sales
to the customer. So normally the expenses like salesman salary, travel expenses,
advertisement cost, commission, banner and billboard, brochure and catalogue, bad
debt, showroom expenses, free gift etc. are included under this.
Distribution expense is the expenses which are sustained for storage and
warehousing, making goods available to delivering to customer and packing of
goods that are going to send.
So in general sense, distributing expense includes warehousing cost, cost of
preparation of challan, storage cost, packing cost, delivery cost etc.
Prime Cost
Prime cost is the cost which is directly assigned to the production of each goods. It
is direct cost which includes the cost of direct material and direct labour in production
of goods. The companies use the prime cost to price their products.
Prime cost is calculated by adding the cost of labour to the cost of raw material that
are directly related to the manufacturing process. The formula for prime cost only
takes into account those variable expenses are directly associated to the production
of each good. The formula for prime cost is as follows
Work Cost
Work cost is the aggregate cost of the direct resource involved in performing the
work. It can be also said that sum of all expenses incurred by a contractor during
the performance of a contract or work
Inventory control
Labour control
Overhead control
Budgetary control
1.2 INDUSTRY PROFILE
Though India's per capita consumption of aluminum stands too low (under 1
kg) comparing to the per capita consumptions of other countries like US &
Europe (range from 25 to 30 kgs), Japan (15 kgs), Taiwan (10 kgs) and China
(3 kgs), the demand is growing gradually. In India, the industries that require
aluminum most include power (44%), consumer durables, transportation (10-
12%), construction (17%) and packaging etc.
The Background
Though the existence of Aluminum was first established in the year 1808, it
took almost 46 years to make its production commercially viable. The
research work of several years resulted in extracting the aluminum from the
ore. Aluminum is third most available element in the earth constituting almost
7.3% by mass. Currently it is also the second most used metal in the world
after steel. Due to the consistent growth of Indian economy at a rate of 8%,
the demand for metals, used for various sectors, is also on the higher side.
As a result, the Indian aluminum industry is also growing consistently. In
FY09, the aluminum industry in India saw a growth of about 9%.
During the 1970s, the government started regulating and controlling the
Indian aluminum industry. Restrictions in entry and price distribution controls
were quite common in the Indian aluminum sector. Aluminum Control Order
was implemented where the aluminum producers had to sell 50% of their
products for electrical usages. However, in 1989, the order was removed as
the government decontrolling was revoked. With de-licensing of industry in
1991, the liberal import of technologies and capital goods was started. The
liberalization resulted in a growth rate of 12% of the industry, comparing to
the growth rate of 6% during the 1980.
The Production
India lies at the eighth position in the list of leading primary aluminum
producers in the world. India saw a significant growth in aluminum production
in the past five years. In 2006-07, the production target of aluminum in India
laid by the Ministry of Mines, Government of India was 1,153 KT, which was
augmented to 1,237 KT in the next year (2007-08). Due to the growing
demand from the construction, electrical, automobiles and packaging
industry, the production of aluminum also hiked up. In FY 09, the total
aluminium production in India was around 1.35 tonnes.
The Consumption
The most commercially mined aluminum ore is bauxite, as it has the highest
content of the base metal. The primary aluminum production process consists of
three stages. First is mining of bauxite, followed by refining of bauxite to alumina
and finally smelting of alumina to aluminum. India has the fifth largest bauxite
reserves with deposits of about 3 bn tons or 5% of world deposits. India's share
in world aluminum capacity rests at about 3%. Production of 1 ton of aluminum
requires 2 tons of alumina while production of 1 ton of alumina requires 2 to 3
tons of bauxite.
Supply
Supply of aluminum is in excess and any deficit can be imported at low rates of
duty. Currently, the demand is stable while supply is in excess.
Demand
Demand for aluminum is estimated to grow at 6%-8% per annum in view of the
low per capita consumption in India. Also, demand for the metal is expected to
pick up as the scenario improves for user industries, like power, infrastructure
and transportation.
Barriers to entry
Large economies of scale. Consequently, high capital costs.
Bargaining power of suppliers
Most domestic players operate integrated plants. Bargaining power is limited in
case of power purchase, as Government is the only supplier. However,
increasing usage of captive power plants (CPP) will help to rationalize power
costs to a certain extent in the long-term.
Bargaining power of customers
Being a commodity, customers enjoy relatively high bargaining power, as prices
are determined on demand and supply.
Competition
Competition is primarily on quality and price, as being a commodity,
differentiation is difficult. However, the recent spate of consolidation has reduced
the competitive pressure in the industry. Further, increasing value addition to
aluminum products has helped some companies protect themselves from the
high volatilities witnessed in this industry.
The commodity markets, and in particular the aluminum industry, are going
through a challenging phase at present because of the sharp slide in
realizations.
During the last quarter of FY15, heightened risk averseness led to dumping
of commodities across the board. The resultant rise in US$, coupled with
surging Chinese exports following slowing demand growth in China resulted
in a sharp decline in LME, which dropped sharply by almost 10%. This was
also accompanied with significant decline in regional premium, resulting in a
large decline in all-inclusive aluminum realizations putting pressure on
margins.
Aluminum prices on LME have declined quite sharply over the last few months
due to confluence of many factors such as heightened risk averseness,
European region uncertainty related to Greece, slowing demand growth from
China and rising exports from it.
The premiums across the regions have declined over 70%. This was primarily
on account of large inventory de-stocking, which was the result of carry trade
becoming less attractive, which in turn can be attributed to various factors
such as change in LME warehousing rules, flattening of forward curve
resulting into decline in contango, tightened regulatory environment that
discouraged warehousing and impending specter of Fed increasing interest
rates resulting in higher financing costs.
Due to above reasons, Realizations have declined sharply in recent months
due to excess supplies. This scenario may continue for a while and hence
over short term, realizations may remain under pressure.
Global demand for aluminum has historically tended to outperform that for
other metals. The weak price performance in some of the recent years has
been more due to supply side developments than any issues with demand. In
2014, global aluminum consumption rose 5.5% YoY, the fastest pace in three
years, despite the slowdown in Chinese consumption growth to around 8%.
China accounted for 44% of global primary aluminum consumption in 2014,
up from 23% in 2005. As the country continues to develop towards a more
consumer-focused economy, aluminum consumption is expected to become
more consumer-driven. Aluminum consumption in the USA has recovered
well since the financial crisis, rising by over a third in the five years to 2014.
However, consumption still remains 20% below pre-crisis peak levels.
European demand has struggled to grow in recent years, as it has been
affected by the ongoing economic slowdown.
Indian aluminum demand rose by 38% in the five years to 2014. India is
currently the world's fifth-largest consumer of aluminum, behind China, the
USA, Japan and Germany, and it is expected that the strong demand
fundamentals have potential to elevate the country to the No. 3 position by
2024.
PROSPECTS
The Indian recovery is on the mend and the economy is expected to grow at
over 7.5% in FY18 and FY19. This would result in aluminum demand growth
on account of stronger consumption and investment. The government's thrust
on power sector that went through a challenging phase bodes well for
aluminum industry as power sector is a strong demand driver for aluminum
consumption in India.
The US demand is expected to remain strong growing at a CAGR of 4-5%
over next few years, as the housing recovery gains traction, car sales
continue to improve and aluminum demand benefits from new applications,
particularly in the automotive sector. Western Europe is expected to grow
moderately amidst economic uncertainty. The aluminum demand is expected
to grow at around 2.5%
In 2022, Chinese aluminum demand is expected to grow at around 6-7%, a
substantial slowdown from the double-digit increase of the past decade.
Demand growth will be strongest in consumer-related sectors.
In short term, Chinese supply is expected to continue to impact Rest of the
World demand-supply dynamics adversely. However in long term, overall the
demand supply scenario for primary aluminum globally looks encouraging as
demand continues to be robust with expectations of around 6% growth.
On the positive side, the reduction in prices of crude derivatives in the recent
months is expected to help on the cost front. In the recent quarters, coal
availability in India is showing signs of improvement. With the expected
growth in output of public sector coal mining companies and the likely
operationalization of captive coal blocks, coal availability in the country may
improve further, which will ease the cost-side pressures
1.3 COMPANY PROFILE
Alloysys Extrusion [P] Ltd came into existence in 2005. The journey from
manufacturing aluminum extrusion to becoming one of the best makers of Quality
Aluminum Extrusions have been filled with accomplishments and accolades.
Alloysys Extrusion aims to have a global presence as a leading global manufacturer
of high-quality Aluminum extruded products. The endeavors of the organization are
focused towards achieving all-round excellence. The organization seeks to
accomplish a fusion of traditional methods and innovative concepts to supply the
best quality extruded product. Alloysys Extrusion manufactures wide variety
Aluminum extrusions like extruded channel, extruded section or extruded profile that
meet diversified usage.
Alloysys Extrusion has been maintaining its utmost standards of precision and
quality and founded on the philosophy of ensuring uncompromising satisfaction to
our customers. We have excellent time delivery of all the versatile extrusion
products and these products are adding a new dimension to the modern building
construction technology and to our business. Alloysys Extrusion [P] Ltd as the
acknowledged market leaders have set up benchmarks for quality, timely delivery
and client satisfaction. We have a unique combination of being flexible and an ability
to react very quickly to changes in designs and specifications. This has ensured that
our products and services to all our customers have been acclaimed internationally.
From the beginning, we have always had a strong foundation of adaptability and
experience. Always working very closely with customers, we have developed our
products and services in tune with the market developments and requirements.
Meeting with customer's need and satisfaction is the true achievement
Alloysys Extrusion believes and follows this only statement at the time of
manufacturing the products. This idea has helped Alloysys Extrusion to set a clear
picture towards company's goal. Alloysys Extrusion is all set to have a wide range
of all kind extrusions in near future. Alloysys Extrusion have well known in eastern
part of the country.
WHAT WE CAN OFFER YOU
OUR CAPABILITIES
Automated Hydraulic Extrusion Presses
Capacity: 3000 MT per annum
Die Library: 1000
profiles ranging from 10mm - 150 mm CCD
Section weight up to 17 kg per piece
Wall thicknesses minimum 0 .5mm - 20 mm
Cut lengths up to 6-7m
Standard alloy ranges
MISSION:
To become the most preferred aluminium extrusion company, focusing on
manufacturing the high quality extruded products with excellent service consistently.
VISION:
PRODUCTS
1. Architectural
A) ALUMINIUM EXTRUDED DOOR PARTITION SERIES
All
Partitions
Middle Section
Top Bottom
Single Partition
Double Partition
Door Top
Door Middle Single
Door Middle Double
Door Bottom
Door Vertical
Glazing Clip
Curtain Wall Section 1423
Curtain Wall Section 1426
Curtain Wall Section 1431
Rectangular Tube
Square Tube
34 Series Outer Frame
34 Series Shutter Frame
34 Series Mullian
34 Series Clip
40 Series Outer Frame
40 Series Shutter Frame
40 Series Mullian
40 Series Clip
Cleat Angle
Bulb Tee
2. Industrial
A) ALUMINUM EXTRUDED ANGLE SECTION SERIES
Equal Angle
Unequal Angle
Fluted Tube
C Section
Stapazing
Hinge
Water Channel Section 7506
Water Channel Section 7511
Round Tube
L Section
Double Roller Section
CUSTOM EXTRUSION
1. INDUSTRY SPECIALIZATION
The most extensive and biggest use of aluminium is in packing. It used for packing
in various forms such as cans, foils, tubes, and bottle tops. Second biggest use of
extruded aluminium is in transportation. Aluminium extruded sections are widely
used in most transport vehicles. It is particularly suited for aeroplanes. A modern
aeroplane contains about 80% aluminium by weight; A Boeing 747 contains about
75 tons of aluminium.
Electrical transmission is another very big application area for aluminium. It has
about 63% of electrical conductivity of copper but only half the density. That makes
it a very attractive substitute for copper in electric cables and transmission lines.
Particular for bare conductors of transmission lines, aluminium is the only choice.
"Meeting with customer's need and satisfaction is the true achievement", we also
believe and follow this only statement at the time of manufacturing our extruded
products
The process initiates with the necessity or demand of an Extruded profile. Once the
necessity arrives, it demands specific die for that extrusion product which results in
the making of specific die for the product After getting the die, finally the production
phase of that particular extruded product takes place in plant under the process.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT
2. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION
Corrosion-Resistant
Ease of Fabrication
Versatility in Joining
3. USES
The knowledge of the total cost cannot fulfill the entire information needs of
management.
For a complete control and analysis, classification of total cost is necessary.
The cost sheet will give the components/ classification of total cost.
Primary Objective:
A study on Cost-benefit analysis for the Alloysys Extrusion Pvt Ltd at Chennai.
Secondary Objective:
The cost of output can be ascertained from the statement known as Cost-
benefit Analysis.
The study of total cost under different classification of cost.
The classification of cost is done on the basis of elements of total cost,
function and behavior of cost.
The cost of a cost center or cost unit is shown in the cost sheet.
1.7 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
Limited Data:
This project has completed with annual reports and it’s just constitutes one
part of data collection i.e. secondary. There were limitations for primary data
collection because of confidentiality.
Limited Period:
This project is based on five year annual conclusions are based on such
limited data. The trend of last five year may not reflect the real working capital
position of the company.
Limited Area:
Also, it was difficult to collect the data regarding the competitors and their
financial Information industry figures difficult to get.
CHAPTER-2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
REVIEW OF LITERATURE:
Mukesh Chouhan & Mrupee Shivani in May 2013, the management accounting,
Mukesh Chouhan & Mrupee Shivani conducted study on the costing techniques –
life cycle costing need for better asset management. Both the capital and the
ongoing operating maintenance cost must be considered wherever asset
management decision involving cost is made. This is the life cycle cost approach. It
is a process to determine the sum of all cost associated with an asset or part thereof,
including acquisition, installation, operating, maintenance, refurbishment and
disposal cost.
Phill Carroll (How to Control Production Cost, 1953) in his book describing the
importance of reduction and control of cost for generating adequate profit by the
companies. The book points out various wrong techniques of cost accounting that
are used by different companies. He clearly mentioning that managers have to be
aware of different cost and how those cost will affect the company’s performance.
John Christian, Gillin, Amar Pandeya (Christian, Gillin, & Pandeya, 1997) discuss
the difficulties faced by facility managers in any company. He mentioned various
problem and one of the important problem is that estimation of operating cost and
maintenance cost in the upcoming years. It is very difficult to predict those cost even
if they are nearest to the actual reality. The accuracy of those cost can be somehow
managed by collecting previous year’s records and analyzing the different factors
that decide the cost effect. He analyzed eight government offices and 14 university
facility and its operating cost and maintenance cost. And he developed cost
prediction model by 24 using regression analysis and neutral networks. And this can
be used to help the system manager to predict the maintenance cost and operation
cost
Roland T. Rust, Christine Moorman and Peter R. (Roland T. Rust, Oct 2002),
states that cost reduction and revenue expansion can be used to increase the profit
and cash flow of a company. In this literature state that operation and quality will
give good foundation to reduce the cost. And at the same time the satisfaction of
customer and market orientation will give foundation to increase the revenue of the
company.
Compton and Brinker (Compton, J & Brinker, & Thomas M, 2005) stated that all
cost are not of same nature and all can’t be used for evaluation for the purpose of
decision making. Only some cost should be used for this purpose. Compton, Brinker
and Thomson distinguished cost in a different way from others. They distinguished
both marginal cost and sunk cost. Martin in 1992 distinguished direct cost, indirect
cost and distributable cost.
Mikhail Chester and Chris Hendrickson (Chester & Hendrickson, 2005), made a
finding that “construction cost goes up in a project with the seven different
mismanagement scenarios. Those seven scenarios are (i) delay (ii) acceleration (iii)
re sequencing of work (iv) cost cutting (v) change of scope (rework) (vi) defective
work (vii) strike”. So the management should consider these things and they should
try to avoid these scenarios to reduce the construction cost.
Rajiv Bhatt (2006) mentioned that “the cost overrun take place due to (i) late
payment from client or contractor, (ii) late supply of materials and decisions, (iii)
delayed possession of site, (iv) inflationary increase in material rates, (v) Revised
estimate”. 25 These things will create the chance for cost overrun. So we should
ensure that these things are not happening and it will prevent the cost overrun.
R K Uppal and Rimpi Kaur (Uppal & Kaur, 2009) analyzed different aspect of
reducing the cost in banking sector. The challenge faced by banks is that gaining
good profit and reducing the cost. It is also compulsory for them to survive and
compete successfully in the competitive business world. Banks get deposit from the
public and that money will be used for the purpose of investing in different
instruments and gives to the public as loan. From the investment they will get returns
as dividend and interest and interest from the loan. The study states that the cost of
deposit is just double of the cost of borrowing. And the study states that investing
on different instrument is better than lending money to the public in the form of loan.
This is because the interested charged from the public for the loan is lesser than the
interest and dividend received from the investment in different instruments. This
works only for public sector bank. For private sector banks and foreign banks it is
better to lend money to the public. And the study also give suggestion to the bank
to reduce the cost to increase the profit.
Stefania-Eliza and Florin (Stefania, Bana, & Sgardea, 2009) examined that
production cost can be used as a good cost for evaluation of the profit of a company.
He says that cost of production is the best cost to evaluate the performance and
profit. He also mentioned that cost of introducing a new product in to the industry
also an important cost. The entry cost includes research cost, product development
cost, product testing cost and cost that incurred for product marketing, advertising
and distribution. These cost will play an important role to the performance of the
company. 26
Keng, Tan Chin, Mansor Norizzati (An Exploration of Cost Overrun in Building
Construction Projects, 2018) stated that cost overrun in construction projects
happen because of changes in design and delay of project. In order to avoid the
cost overrun they should ensure the design of the project. It should not be changing
often. And they should acquire in depth knowledge about the key project parts. And
there should also a scheduled planning. The planning should be done according to
the important and scope of each work. And it will avoid the chance for pre mature
delivery of material to the project location. By taking care of these thing we can
control the cost overrun in the building construction projects.
Dr. Atul Bansal (Bansal, 2014) studied about determination of efficiency of the
banks. He used cost benefit analysis for this study purpose. He says that banks can
perform well with a good competition strategy. But one of the main problem is that
it is not easy to predict the cost because of uncertainty. He also mentioned that
banks should reduce the cost and increase the income to survive in the market and
to successfully compete against the competitors.
Kim Yong Woo (Implication of New Production Paradigm for Project Cost Control,
2002) in his book state that in the area of overhead cost control, current control uses
resource-based costing and volume-based allocation, techniques based on the
transformation view and manage-by-results (MBR) thinking. The research
introduced a new overhead control method, profit point analysis (PPA), which take
on activity-based costing from manufacturing. The case study is conducted to test
the new method recommended that it belongs to the new production paradigm in
that it conceptualizes production as a flow and adopts manage-by-means (MBM)
thinking.
R Jayaraman (Project Cost Control) has found that cost control which is
restructured achieved a good result. And it worked better than actual expectation.
And the result was , cold rolling mill did rolling of steel sheet completed fast and
effectively.
RESEARCH:
Research is an organized, systematic, database, critical, objective, scientific,
inquiry or investigation into a specific problem, undertaken with the purpose of
finding answer or solutions to it. Emory defines research as, “any organized inquiry
designed and carried out to provide information for solving a problem”.
PRIMARY DATA:
The primary data is that the data which is collected fresh or first hand and for
first time, which is original in nature. Primary data can be collected through personal
interview, Questionnaire and so on to support the secondary data.
SECONDARY DATA:
This data, which have already been collected and presented by any agency, may
be used for the purpose of investigation. Such data may be called secondary data.
Secondary data may earlier be published data or unpublished data. Usually
published data are available in annual report.
3.3 TOOLS USED FOR THE STUDY:
I. PERCENTAGE OF OVERHEADS
Factory Overhead
Administration Overhead
Selling & distribution Overhead
2018-19 2019-20
Chart showing Cost Sheet for the year 2018-19 & 2019-20
2018-19 2019-20
Interpretation:
In the year 2018-19 the total cost was 73,396,177 but in the year 2019-20 it was
increased to 76,531,782 because company increased production capacity. Even
though the company need to take certain measures to increase its profit level by
decreasing its production cost. But the company reach its desired goal as there is
a more sales.
Table No. 4.2
2020-21 2021-22
Chart showing Cost Sheet for the year 2020-21 & 2021-2022
2020-21 2021-22
Interpretation:
In the year 2020-21 & 2021-22 there is a small change in the total cost. But profits
reduced drastically because of the less net sale in 2016-17 that is 78,910,159
compared to 85,677,188 in 2015-16. Because lesser turnover compared to the
previous year. And in this year real estate fall down it affect the house construction
it indirectly affects this industry also.
Table No. 4.3
2020-21 2021-22
Chart showing Cost Sheet for the year 2020-21 & 2021-22
2020-21 2021-22
Interpretation:
In the year 2020-21 & 2021-22 there is a change in the total cost. But profits
increased in 2021- 20 compared to 2020-21 even though the net sale decreased
in 2021-22. The main reason for increasing profit is that company could reduce the
total cost in 2021-22 that is 63,56,1834 compared to 76,398877 in 2020-21. That
was a great positive sign for the company.
Table No. 4.4
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
2021-22
Analysis:
In the year 2018-19 direct material shows 100 %(as basic year) but in the year
2019-20 it is increase to 114.37%. And in the year 2020-21 direct material
increase to 108.83% and in the year 2021-22 it was decrease to 86.51%.
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Interpretation:
From the above graph we can observe that the percentage of direct material in the
year 2018-19 is considered as 100% (as base year) then it has been increased to
114.37% in the year 2019-20. But in 2020-21 and 2021-22 it has been decreased
to 108.83% and 86.51%.
So, we can observe that there is increased in direct material when compared to
the base year 2018-19 in the 2019-20. After that direct material cost decreased
gradually. It’s a good sign to the company.
Table No. 4.5
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
2021-22
Analysis:
From the above table direct labor cost in the base year 2018-19 is 100%. Then it
has been increased to 102.56% in the year 2019-20 and again in the year 2020-21
and 2021-22 it has been increased to 103.84% and 109.15% respectively.
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Interpretation:
From the above graph we can observe that the percentage of Direct Labour in the
base year 2018-19 is 100%. Then it has been increased to 102.56% in the year
2019-20 and again in the year 2020-21 and 2021-22 it has been increased to
103.84% and 109.15% respectively.
So, we can say that there is a gradual increase in Direct Labour when compare to
the base year 2018-19 because in the company fell that workers are the assets of
the company so year by year they added the workers. And a negative impact by
adding workers is that it will increase cost of labour that will not good for company
if they do not extract the work.
Table No. 4.6
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
2021-22
Analysis:
In the above table in the base year 2018-19 is 100%, that has been decreased in
the year 2019-20 is 71.91%. In the year 2020-21 is 54.85% that has been
decreased, but in the year 2021-22 it has been increased in 59.97% respectively.
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Interpretation:
The above Graph shows that manufacturing overhead for 3 years from 2018-19 to
2019-20, there is a continuous decrease in the manufacturing cost as the
company is having good control over its but in the year 2021-22 slightly increased
it is not a good sign to the company. Company need to use more machine power
than the man power as the result the process will be faster and there is a decrease
in the training cost to the workers. This helps the company to invest the saved
amount in implementing some advertisement programmers to increase sales.
Table No. 4.7
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
2021-22
Analysis:
In the above table the year 2018-19 is considered as 100% then administration
expense has been increased to 104.19% and 108.24% in the year 2019-20 and
2020-21 respectively. And in 2021- 22 it has been decreased to 84.34%.
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Interpretation:
So, we can say that there are more fluctuations when compared to the base year
2018-19 but in the year 2021-22 it decreased its cost. It is a good sign; the
company should maintain same thing.
Table No. 4.8
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
2021-22
Analysis:
In the above table in the year 2018-19 is 100%, then it has been increasing to 10,
620,473 i.e., 103.23% in the year 2019-20 and in the year 2020-21 the Selling &
Distribution amount increased to 13,424,753 i.e., 126.40% then in the year 2021-
22 the Selling & Distribution decreased to 8,321,817 i.e., 78.36% respectively.
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Interpretation:
From the above graph we can observe that the percentage of Selling &
Distribution Over head in the year 2018-19 is 100%, than it has been increase
to10, 620,473 i.e., 103.23% in the year 2019-20 and in the year 2020-21 the
Selling & Distribution amount increased to 13,424,753 i.e., 126.40% then in the
year 2021-22 the Selling & Distribution decreased to 8,321,817 i.e., 78.36%
respectively.
So, we can say that there are some fluctuations when compared to the base year
2018-19 but last year well controlled expenses and achieved good sales also it is
good achievement to the company.
Table No. 4.9
2018-2019
2019-2020
2020-2021
2021-2022
Analysis:
In the above table in the year 2014-15 is 100% then it has been increased to
104.27 % in the year 2015-16. In the year 2016-17it has been decreased to
104.09% but again it decreased to 86.60% in the year 2017-18.
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Interpretation:
Form the above graph we can observe that the % of Total Cost from in the year
2018-19 is 100% then it has been increased to 104.27 % in the year 2019-20. But
in the year 2020-21 it has been decreased to 104.09% but again it decreased to
86.60% in the year 2021-22.
So, there is a fluctuation in total cost when compare to the base year 2014-15. But
last two years Total Cost decreasing it is good sign to the company it helps to
increase the company profit in 2021-22.
Table No. 4.10
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
2021-22
Analysis:
In the above table in the year 2018-19 is 100%. In the year 2019-20 it has been
increased to 110.52% and in the year 2020-21 and 2021-22 it has been decreased
to 107.20% and 93.89% respectively.
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Interpretation:
From the above graph, we can see that the Prime Cost in the year 2018-19 is
100% as base year. But during 2019-20 it has been increased to 110.52% and in
the year 2020-21 and 2021-22 it has been decreased to 107.20% and 93.89%
respectively.
So, we can say that decreasing prime cost is good but company should not reduce
this cost by reducing output. Company must increase the production and reduce
the prime cost through optimum utilization of recourses.
Table No. 4.11
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
2021-22
Analysis:
In the above table during the year 2018-19 the Work Cost is 100%. The chart
shows the continues decline in the Work Cost from year 2019-20 to 2021-22 that
is 104.49%, 99.03% and 88.59% respectively.
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Interpretation:
The above graph revels that information about the Work Cost calculated from the
last preceding 4 years. During the year 2018-19 the Work Cost is 100%. The chart
shows the continues decline in the Work Cost from year 2019-20 to 2021-22 that
is 104.49%, 99.03% and 88.59% respectively.
So, we see that there is decreasing trend of work cost after the year 2019-20 it is
good sign for company, maintain this trend for better prosperity
Table No. 4.12
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
2021-22
Analysis:
Interpretation:
The above graph helps us to determine the impact of Cost of Production on Net
Profit of the company. In 2018-19 the company incurred Rs 62,775,704 cost of
production but in the year 2019-20 it has been increased to Rs 65,568,256 but in
the year 2020-21 and 2021-22 it has been decreased to Rs 62,974,124 and Rs
55,240,017 respectively.
So, we can observe that in the year 2020-21 and 2021-22 Company having well
control over the cost of production.
Table No. 4.13
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
2021-22
Analysis:
In the above table in the year 2018-19 is considered as 100% then it has been
increased to 106.88% in the year 2019-20. In 2020-21 and 2021-22 it has been
decreased to 98.44% and 88.72%.
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Interpretation:
From the above graph we can observe that the percentage of sale in the year
2018-19 is considered as 100% then it has been increased to 106.88% in the year
2019-20. In 2020-21 and 2021-22 it has been decreased to 98.44% and 88.72%.
So, we can observe that there is a increased in sales when compared to the base
year 2018-19 in the 2019-20 after that sales decreased gradually because more
competitors entered in the market their fore company need to focus more on their
business to impure the sales.
Table No. 4.14
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
2021-22
Analysis:
In the above table shows in net profit 134.20% in the year 2019-20 compared to
the base year 2018-19 i.e. 100% and 2020-21 suddenly profit decreased to
2,511,282 because the input cost is very high and sales is less and also slowdown
of electrical industry but in the year 2021-22 it has been recovered to the large
extent i.e. 7,574,218
2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Interpretation:
In the above graph we can see that there is a quantum jump in net profit 134.20% in the
year 2019-20 compared to the base year 2018-19 i.e., 100% and 2020-21 suddenly profit
decreased to 2,511,282 because the input cost is very high and sales is less and also
slowdown of electrical industry but in the year 2021-22 it has been recovered to the large
extent i.e., 7,574,218
Ratio Analysis
1. Current Ratio
2019
2020
2021
2022
Analysis:
The table above shows the position of current asset and current liabilities has
been shown from the year 2019 – 2022. Table indicates that the values of current
asset and current liabilities changes every year. As in the current assets the value
is increased from 2019 to 2021 but at the year 2022 the value decreased as
shown in above table. And also the value of current liabilities also increase for the
year 2019 – 2022, but there is a slightly change in last year. At the end of the 2022
there is a decrease in current assets and increase in current liabilities.
2019 2020 2021 2022
Interpretation:
The standard current ratio of the firm should be 2:1. From the above table it is
observed that Current Ratio is instable and fluctuating. In the year 2019 the ratio is
1.165 times. In the year 2020 the ratio is 1.18 times. In the year 2021 the ratio is
1.16 times; 2022 the ratio is 1.078 times. But still, it is not satisfactory.
CHAPTER 5
FINDINGS, SUGGESTIONS AND CONCLUSION
5.1 FINDINGS
In my study of Cost Analysis at Alloysys Extrusion Pvt Ltd, I came to find the
following information.
Profit of Alloysys Extrusion Pvt Ltd was increasing continuously but in 2020-
21 the profit reduced. But in 2021-22 company again increased their profit.
The labour cost of the company is increasing every year because they are
recruiting more and more employees.
The net sale of the company decreased during the periods 2020-21 and
2021-22.
The direct materials has increased in the year 2019-20 compared to 2018-
19. But in 2020-21 and in 2021-22 it decreased due to the fluctuations in
the cost of raw materials.
The cost of manufacturing overhead is decreased continuously till 2020-21.
But in the year 2021-22 it has been increased slightly.
In Selling and distribution overhead there are some fluctuations over years
when compared to the base year 2018-19. But in last year company
controlled expense and it is a good achievement by the company.
There is fluctuation in total cost when compare to the base year 2018-19.
But in last two years we can see that total cost is decreasing and it is good
sign to the company. And it helped the company to increase the profit in
2021-22
Prime cost is decreasing from the year 2020-21. But it is worth to mention
that company should not reduce the prime cost by reducing the output.
Cost of production has increased in the year 2019-20 but the company
could reduce it during last two years.
Net sales of the company increased in 2019-20 when compared to the base
year 2018-19, but after those sales decreased gradually because of good
performance of competitors. Even though in 2021-22 they could increase
the profit because they could reduce the total cost.
5.2 SUGGESTIONS
From Research and Study I submit the following Suggestions.
Alloysys should try to obtain more orders which will help the company to
manufacture bulk products and thereby reduce the cost of production.
Alloysys should always purchase the high-quality raw materials because it
helps to attract more customers and expand its market.
The company should purchase raw materials at reasonable price so that
they can reduce cost.
The company should adopt advance technology to improve their product
quality and efficiency.
It is recommended to Alloysys take steps to reduce the overall costs that
will enable the company to reduce the cost of product and its price.
The Company should utilize all the available resources with it effectively to
achieve its targets.
Since the company’s manufacturing expenses are not under control and not
satisfactory during 2021 & 22, they should work on reduce manufacturing
cost.
Now it very badly needs different Cost reduction methods and Techniques.
The Company also should try to reduce its selling and distribution cost while
considering the current market demand, competitors strategies and
changes in customers.
Company should use more machine power than the man power in order to
make the process faster and there should be a decrease in the training cost
to the workers. This will help the company to invest the saved amount in
doing some promotional and advertisement programmers to increase sales.
Prime cost is decreasing from the year 2020-21. But it is worth to mention
that the company should not reduce the prime cost by reducing the output.
5.3 CONCLUSION