Failure Report Tower Crane Bolt
Failure Report Tower Crane Bolt
Failure Report Tower Crane Bolt
Prepared by Approved by
Raúl Mora Salatiel Lima
INDEX
Page
INTRODUCTION 3
1. EVALUATION PROCEDURE 5
REFERENCES 12
ANNEX 13
Date : 11/19/2018 Page Number 3 of 16
Quality Control Department
INTRODUCTION
In September of 2018 and after approximately two years of service, a failure was
detected in the form of a fracture of an anchoring bolt belonging to the base of the
crane tower located in the facilities of Jetty, Puerto . According to the information
provided by the operations personnel, a section of approximately 15 cm was
removed from the base of the crane tower accidentally during a tightening
operation, verifying that the section removed and that which still remained inside
the concrete foundation were separated by a fracture. In Figure 1, the concrete
slab and the location of the failed bolt are shown.
The tower crane installation, model MC205 2008 and loading specifications of 10
T with double reeving, was carried out by the Panamanian company CORPINSA
in 2016. As shown in Fig. 1, the tower crane installation consists of fixed bases at
right angles bolted directly onto a concrete foundation of 1.80 M high. However, it
is important to note that this configuration does not correspond to the original
installation design, established in drawing 5285-724-CD-001 supplied by the
engineering company CPC (Fig. 2), where it indicates that the metal frame in the
base of the tower must be embedded in the concrete foundation at a depth of 74
cm and therefore, no section of the bolts should be visible to the surface. At the
time of this report, it was not possible to find records of the sequence used in the
concrete casting and the use of reinforced concrete in the foundations.
Date : 11/19/2018 Page Number 4 of 16
Quality Control Department
a) b)
Figure 1. Installation of the fixed base of the crane tower. a) Bolted to the concrete
foundation, b) location of the fractured bolt
Figure 2. Original design for the base crane installation in the concrete foundation
1. EVALUATION PROCEDURE
For the purpose of characterizing the bolt failure zone, the following procedures
were performed.
The fracture surface shows different characteristics related to the way in which the
rupture process was developed. On the left of Figure 4-a, small crack-arrest marks
are observed that converge radially to the point indicated by the arrow, oriented to
the possible start of the failure. The step type formation of these marks could be
attributed to a progressive advance of the crack front during different load cycles.
Another feature related to a progressive advance in the fracture process is a
greater darkening in specifics regions, due to a longer period of time exposed to
oxidation from the environment. This condition can be seen over the area with
arrest mark in Figure 4-a.
In the upper left corner of Figure 4-b, a region of smooth and flat-appearing can be
seen, which could be indicative of an abrupt fracture. The differences in surface
Date : 11/19/2018 Page Number 6 of 16
Quality Control Department
roughness are related to the manner in which the crack propagates through
different planes of fracture, and the intensity and type of stress involved. In the
regions with greater roughness, the stresses are greater and developed under
overload conditions, because the component retains most of its integrity in the
cross section at the beginning of the failure process. In the other hand, a cone is
evidenced at the center of the fracture surface (enclosed in the circle in Figure 4-b)
that indicates the final tear zone, possibly due to the torsion generated during the
tightening attempt by the maintenance personnel.
It can be seen from the image of Figure 4-c, that the advance of the fracture mode
was carried out through at a plane of approximately 45 degrees with respect to the
horizontal, which could be indicative that in the cross section of the bolt, shear
stresses are present due to load cycles during tower crane operations.
Under the condition of installation of the crane tower, in which the fixed base is
bolted to the concrete foundation, the dynamic loads generated by the lifting
cycles are transmitted from the metal structure to the concrete through the bolts,
converting bolts into load transfer components and consequently the area of the
junction where the shear efforts become greater (weaker element). On the other
hand, the proximity to the sea (coastal environment) turns out to be a favorable
environment for the appearance of environmental corrosion phenomena, where a
high concentration of chlorides and humidity could lead small pitting to appear on
the exposed surface of the bolt, acting as stress riser.
It is important to note that the failure mode was not confirmed by means of a
Scanning Electron Microscopy analysis or calculating the useful life under a range
of stress. However, the original installation design, where the metal frame of the
base is embedded in the concrete foundation, could allow a better distribution of
the dynamic loads, by directly transmitting most of the resulting cyclical stresses to
the concrete. Likewise, under this design the bolts would be provided protection
Date : 11/19/2018 Page Number 7 of 16
Quality Control Department
a) b)
Possible area of
final tear by
Flat surface torsion
Arrest Marks
c) d)
a) b)
c) d)
The hardness property was evaluated in the material on the Rockwell C (HRC)
scale, using the technique of ultrasonic contact impedance and meet the
requirements of ASTM A1038. It was carried out random measurements on the
cross section of the bolt near the failure and on the longitudinal half away of the
failure.
Date : 11/19/2018 Page Number 10 of 16
Quality Control Department
The average values of hardness in the cross section near the failure was 40, 8
HRC, while in the longitudinal section it was 44, 9 HRC. This variation in the
average of the hardness values can be attributed to the fluctuation that usually
occurs in the measurements of this property, when applying portable manual
methods in the obtaining of hardness values, in this case ultrasonic contact
impedance. Likewise, the longitudinal section frequently tends to have higher
values of hardness because it is the main forming axis, where the hardening by
deformation is greater.
According to the obtained results, it is considered that the hardness values are
consistent with the microstructural observations and correspond to the expected
values in quenched and tempered grade 4130 steels, at approximate tempered
temperatures of 900 ◦C.
For the purpose of making an effort to verify the grade of alloy supplied by the
manufacturer, the operations personnel performed a Positive Material
Identification (PMI) analysis on the bolt, obtaining a search match according to the
library of the test device similar to a 4130 grade steel (ANNEX B). However, it is
important to note that due to limitations inherent in the application of the PMI by
portable X-ray fluorescence, some elements of the Non-Metals group such as C,
Si and S, are excluded from the scope of this technique applications, therefore,
any identification procedure in low and medium alloy steels should be considered
as a qualitative approximation to the grade of the alloy.
Arrest marks are evinced on the fracture surface that may correspond to the
possible start point of the failure. The stepped pattern of these marks
suggest a progressive advance of the crack front. The presence of a region
with greater darkening, reveals a longer exposure period of that part to the
oxidant action of the medium and is often associated with progressive
Date : 11/19/2018 Page Number 11 of 16
Quality Control Department
REFERENCE
1. ASTM A-29/A 29M “Standard Specification for Steel Bar, Carbon and
Alloy, Hot Wrought, General Requirement for”, USA, 2014.
2. ASTM E3 “Standard Guide for Preparation of Metallographic
Specimen”, USA, 2011.
3. ASTM A-1038 “Standard Test Method for Portable Hardness Testing
by the Ultrasonic Contact Impedance (UCI) Method
4. ASM METAL HANDBOOK “Metallography and Microstructure” Vol, 9,
USA, 2004
5. ASM METAL HANDBOOK “Fractography” Vol 12, USA, 2004
6. ASM METAL HANDBOOK “Fatigue and Fracture” Vol 19, USA, 2004
7. M. Montero, L. Flores “Bolt Metallography and Hardness Test”
Panama, 2018
Date : 11/19/2018 Page Number 13 of 16
Quality Control Department
ANNEXX A
Date : 11/19/2018 Page Number 14 of 16
Quality Control Department
Date : 11/19/2018 Page Number 15 of 16
Quality Control Department
Date : 11/19/2018 Page Number 16 of 16
Quality Control Department
ANNEX B