Resolution 4T, 4E, 4S & 4D User Guide
Resolution 4T, 4E, 4S & 4D User Guide
Resolution 4T, 4E, 4S & 4D User Guide
2
5.2 Calculating array coverage ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 66
5.2.1 Horizontal coverage ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 67
5.2.2 Vertical coverage .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 69
5.2.3 Vertical coverage to suit venue profiles ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 72
5.3 Typical bass systems and alignment.................................................................................................................................................................................................. 77
5.3.1 Directional bass arrays and why you may not need to use them ........................................................................................................................................................ 84
5.3.2 Types of cardioid/end-fired systems & their pros and cons ................................................................................................................................................................ 85
5.3.3 Compensating for positional offsets .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 87
6 Connector pin-outs and cables ....................................................................................................................................................................................88
6.1 EP-6 connector pin-outs .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 88
6.2 Recommended cables ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 89
6.3 Loudspeaker polarity ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 90
7 Amplification and control ............................................................................................................................................................................................93
7.1 Electrical and fire safety .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 93
7.2 Choosing a power amplifier .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 95
7.3 Recommended Funktion One power amplifiers ................................................................................................................................................................................ 97
7.3.1 Amplifier output pin-outs..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 98
7.4 Rack patch examples with Funktion One XO2 or XO4/4A control ................................................................................................................................................... 100
7.5 Crossover settings ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 105
7.6 Limiter settings - including on-line calculator .................................................................................................................................................................................. 106
7.7 Final limiter adjustments for spectral balance ................................................................................................................................................................................ 109
3
1 Thank you
Thank you for purchasing a Funktion One Resolution 4 system. All Funktion One loudspeaker systems are designed and built in England. Our design philosophy is
to achieve outstanding sonic accuracy and efficiency through innovative acoustical design rather than relying on headroom-robbing equalisation. This approach
provides an audible sense of immediacy and involvement reminiscent of the finest musical instruments.
4
Resolution 4E - basic version for installations and medium scale events
Each Resolution 4E system comprises:
1 x Resolution 4E complete with:
Integral M10 fixing points
EP6 in & link
Driver options
Choice of ceramic or neodymium drivers
5
Resolution 4D downfill system
Each Resolution 4D comprises:
1 x Resolution 4D complete with:
Integral flying system
Captive inter-cabinet/input cable
We suggest that you keep some of the original packaging in case you have to return a unit for repair or replacement.
Funktion One Research Limited and its distributors cannot be held liable for product damaged through the use of non-approved packaging, shipping or handling
methods.
6
2.3 Handling
Please handle your Resolution 4 system safely to avoid injury.
Palletised, wrapped and strapped shipments should only be moved using a fork-lift truck driven by a qualified forklift truck driver
Resolution 4T systems are supplied with wheelboards making them very easy to move around and stack safely. Wheelboards are optional for Resolution
4E systems
We recommend providing staff with suitable manual handling training before they manoeuvre a Resolution 4 system. Helpful hints are available free of charge
from the UK Health and Safety Executive. See (www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg143.pdf).
If your Resolution 4 system is destined for an installation, ensure that it remains protected by its packaging until the installation site is ready for its installation.
This is a powerful and efficient mid-high enclosure which is designed to be operated as part of a four way system with
F218, F121 or F221 bass. The sonic quality of the Resolution 4 is exceptional.
Dimensionally identical to the Resolution 5 and 18, this enclosure also shares the same patented point-source flying system
making for fast and easily adjustable set up. All inter-cabinet flying hardware is built into each enclosure leaving no chains,
pins or tools to lose. And the WB5 stackable wheelboard system makes Resolution 4T and 4E systems easy to truck pack
and easy to move around – see www.funktion-one.com/dl/files/Wheelboard-and-Scrim_web.pdf.
The Resolution 4T system is easy to stack on top of Funktion One subwoofers using the GSS-ResT ground stack tilt strap
with the GSM-Anchor. See www.funktion-one.com/products/ground-stack-systems/.
Fig 3.1-1 Resolution 4T
7
Resolution 4T features
Fully horn loaded for high efficiency
Funktion One designed Neodymium drivers
Integrated inter-cabinet flying system
Captive inter-cabinet/input cable in recessed cable pocket
Identical size to Resolution 5 and 18
Supplied with protective wheelboard
Optional scrim for discrete appearance
Resolution 18 bass system available (has matching profile)
Resolution 4D downfill also available for Resolution 4T/Resolution 18 combinations flown from FG53 or FG55 flying grids
With equal sound quality to the Resolution 4T, the Resolution 4E is supplied in a simplified 'trapezoid' enclosure without the
built in flying hardware provided on the full touring version. A dedicated flying system specific to the Resolution 4E will
make this product a highly attractive choice in applications where occasional rigging and de-rigging.
Like the Resolution 4T the 4E is typically used two wide for 80-90 degree overall dispersion. Dedicated accessories also
enable the R4E to be flown and arrayed in fixed installations.
A single row of Resolution 4E cabinets may also be mounted on top of Funktion One subwoofers using the GSS-ResE ground
stack tilt strap with the GSM-Anchor E. See www.funktion-one.com/products/ground-stack-systems/.
8
Resolution 4E features
Choice of Ceramic or Neodymium drivers
Simplified enclosure ideal for permanent installations
Same sonic performance as full touring version
Dedicated installation flying hardware available if required
Optional Wheelboard (as supplied with the Resolution 4T)
Single-row Ground Stack Securing system available
Optional scrim for discrete appearance
Optional flying system for occasional rigging/ de-rigging operations
The Resolution 4S is suited to a wide range of applications including demanding club and theatre venues. Also available
with a passive high frequency crossover, the R4S can be bi-amplified to minimise overall system cost.
The mid-high horn section can be supplied rotated through 90° to facilitate horizontal use where ceiling height is
restricted.
For weight critical applications the system can be specified with lightweight Neodymium magnets.
9
Resolution 4S features
Lightweight minimalist design approach
Minimal processing and no EQ required
Equal sound quality to enclosed versions
Funktion One designed drivers
Optional lightweight Neodymium drivers
Optional passive HF crossover
Suspension points provided (May be attached vertically or horizontally depending on the required enclosure orientation)
Its unique tapered shape allows the rest of the cluster to be coupled closely together generating a coherent wave-front and adding a finishing touch to the
spherical cluster's aesthetics.
As with other Resolution Touring enclosures, all inter-cabinet flying hardware is included.
Resolution 4D features
Unique shape for close arraying
Large vertical coverage
Two-way active
Horn loaded for high efficiency
Funktion One designed Neodymium drivers
Built-in flying hardware
Captive inter-cabinet/input cable in recessed cable pocket
Optional scrim for discrete appearance
10
3.2 Specifications
Resolution 4T, 4E & 4S systems
11
Recommended amplifier power using suitable limiters:
Section Power into 16 ohms Power into 8 ohms Power into 4 ohms
12” Low-mid - 300 - 1,200W 600 - 2,400W
8” High-mid 200 - 800W 400 - 1,600W 800 - 3,200W
1” High 50 - 200W 100 - 400W 200 - 800W
Drivers & connectors: Resolution 4T: Neodymium Drivers, EP6 connector panel & captive link lead in cable recess
Resolution 4E-CP: Ceramic drivers, passive HF crossover, NL4 panel sockets
Resolution 4E-C: Ceramic drivers, active, EP6 panel sockets
Resolution 4E-NP: Neodymium drivers, passive HF crossover, NL4 panel sockets
Resolution 4E-N: Neodymium drivers, active, EP6 panel sockets
Resolution 4S: Ceramic drivers, active, industrial sprung terminals
(Optional neodymium drivers, optional passive HF crossover)
12
Resolution 4D downfill system
Power ratings: 8” 200W AES, 800W peak (16 ohms), 1” 50W AES, 200W peak (16 ohms)
Voltage ratings: 8” 56vrms, 112v peak (16 ohms), 1” 28vrms, 56v peak (16 ohms)
13
3.3 Dimensions
14
Fig 3.3-2 Resolution 4E dimensions – mm (ft & inches)
15
Fig 3.3-3 Resolution 4S dimensions – mm (ft & inches)
The lifting points are shown for vertical orientation (main drawing) and horizontal orientation (inset)
16
Fig 3.3-4 Resolution 4D dimensions – mm (ft & inches)
17
4 Flying and stacking
4.1 Mechanical safety
Use only Funktion One manufactured or approved flying and stacking accessories.
A three wide, two deep Resolution 4 array – plus downfills - weighs less than ½ton and flies from a single point.
The intuitive simplicity with which the cluster clips together combined with the enclosures' extreme lightness and
small size makes working with the system a liberating experience from handling and rigging perspectives, as endorsed
by enthusiastic users worldwide.
Resolution 4 point source arrays are built as multiple columns hung on the spokes of purpose-built grids. The grid
spokes are set for 40 - 45° horizontal splay angles and are spaced to allow room for vertically curved arrays.
The integral cabinet fittings are also useful for ground-stacking. Enclosures can easily be secured, linked and aimed.
18
Quick deployment
An arena cluster can usually be assembled and flown by just two people in
about 20 minutes.
Each spring-hinged flying tab forms an inter-cabinet pivot making any re-
aiming very easy. Two people can re-set the vertical angles without
lowering the cluster to the ground.
Note
The Resolution 4D downfill cabinet has narrower horizontal coverage than
the Resolution 4T but may be used beneath Resolution 4T/Resolution 18
combinations flown from FG53 or FG55 flying grids. Its width and spring-
hinged flying tabs are fully compatible for easy integration.
19
4.3 Flying facilities vs loudspeaker type
20
Resolution 4E - basic version for installations and medium scale events
Integral rigging
Integral M10 fixing points
Funktion One approved flying parts.
Optional flying system available for infrequent (e.g. seasonal) rigging/de-rigging
21
Resolution 4S skeletal loudspeaker system
Integral rigging
Integral lifting points (May be attached vertically or horizontally depending on the required enclosure orientation)
22
Resolution 4D downfill system
Integral rigging
Quick deployment integral flying system
23
4.4 Main touring system flying components and typical grid layouts
Column hanger - for Resolution 4T touring system
Fig 4.4-1 Column hanger details (left) - fitted to Resolution 4T enclosure (right)
24
FG42 (2-way) and FG43 (3-way) flying grids (FG43 shown)
FG series flying grids cater for a variety of Resolution 4 array widths, typically 1, 2 or 3 columns wide, set to horizontal splay angles of 40° (FG43, FG53 & FG55)
or 45° (FG42). See plan views later.
Fig 4.4-2 FG43 3-wide flying grid with BR53 bridle and H505 chain hoist attached via SH325 shackles – not to scale
(Note tilt strap fits behind tilt strap restraining point - see central radial view)
Resolution 4 grids
FG42 2-way flying grid for 2-wide Resolution 4 arrays FG43 3-way flying grid for 2 or 3-wide Resolution 4 arrays
FG42 with integral chain bridle -19Kg FG43 -35Kg, 5 shackles - 3.25Kg, chain bridle (complete with chain hoist) - 11Kg
2 column hangers & tilt-straps - 10Kg 3 column hangers & tilt-straps - 15Kg
Total flying weight without Loudspeakers - 29Kg Total flying weight without Loudspeakers - 64.2Kg
25
FG53 and FG55 flying grids may also be used for Resolution 4 arrays (FG55 shown)
Resolution 4 systems may be flown with 40° horizontal splay angles using FG53 or FG55 grids (with 20° spoke splay) either by leaving the intermediate spokes
unused - or by using the intermediate spokes to fly Resolution 18 bass cabinets. See plan views later.
Fig 4.4-3 FG55 5-wide grid scheme with BR5 bridle, and H505 chain hoist attached via SH325 shackles – not to scale
(Note tilt strap fits behind tilt strap restraining point - see central radial view)
FG53 3-way flying grid for a 2-wide Resolution 4 arrays plus FG55 5-way flying grid for a 3-wide Resolution 4 arrays plus
an optional central Resolution 18 bass column if required 2 optional interspersed Res 18 bass columns if required
FG53 Grid and 5 shackles - 31.25kg FG55 Grid and 5 shackles - 54.25kg
Chain bridle + rear chain hoist - 11kg Chan bridle (c/w rear leg hoist) - 11kg
3 column hangers & tilt straps - 10kg 5 column hangers & tilt straps - 25kg
Total flying weight for a 3-way array without loudspeakers - 57.25kg Total flying weight for a 5-way array without loudspeakers - 90.25k
26
Do not overload the flying system!
A maximum of four Resolution 4 cabinets - plus an additional downfill - may be flown from each column hanger
Fig 4.4-4 FG43 grid with column hangers on outer points - for 2 or 3 cabinets per column (+ downfill if required) - or if more down-tilt is required
(Bridles, safeties etc not shown)
Fig 4.4-5 FG43 grid with column hangers on middle points - for just 1 or 2 cabinets per column - or if more up-tilt is required
(Bridles, safeties etc not shown)
27
Fig 4.4-6 FG43 grid with top row in place - on outer hanger points for 2 or 3 cabinets per column or when more down-tilt is required
(Bridles, safeties etc not shown)
Resolution 4T cabinets with their column hangers on the outer hanger points in preparation for a 2 or 3-deep cluster or if an overall down-tilt is required.
Placing column hangers in this forward (outer) position helps counteract the tendency for deep, curved columns to tilt upwards about their centre of gravity.
28
Fig 4.4-7 FG43 grid with top row in place - on inner hanger points for just 1 or 2 cabinets per column or when more up-tilt is required
(Bridles, safeties etc not shown)
Resolution 4T cabinets with their column hangers on the middle hanger points in preparation for a 1 or 2-deep cluster or if an overall up-tilt is required. Placing
column hangers in position further back helps counteract the tendency for shallow columns to tilt downwards about their centre of gravity.
29
2-wide Resolution 4 array using FG42 grid and the outer hanger points
Fig 4.4-8 FG42 grid showing main bridle points for a 2-wide array. (Outer hanger positions for 3 cabinets per column - or for more down-tilt)
Use steel wire rope slings (with PVC protective tubing) near the main bridle points as safety back-ups
Note that the FG42 grid has a 45° inter-cabinet angle (to cater for high tilt operations) and it is supplied complete with an integral 3-legged bridle.
30
2-wide Resolution 4 array using FG42 grid and the middle hanger points
Fig 4.4-9 FG42 grid showing main bridle points for a 2-wide array. (Middle hanger positions for just 1 or 2 cabinets per column - or for more up-tilt)
Use steel wire rope slings (with PVC protective tubing) near the main bridle points as safety back-ups
Again, note that the FG42 grid has a 45° inter-cabinet angle and it is supplied complete with an integral 3-legged bridle.
31
2-wide Resolution 4 array using FG43 grid
On outer hanger points
Fig 4.4-10 FG43 grid showing main bridle points and safety points for a 2-wide array
Outer hanger positions for 2 or 3 cabinets per column (+ downfill if required) - or for more down-tilt
32
2-wide Resolution 4 array using FG43 grid
On middle hanger points
Fig 4.4-11 FG43 grid showing main bridle points and safety points for a 2-wide array
Middle hanger positions for 1 or 2 cabinets per column - or for more up-tilt
33
3-wide Resolution 4 array using FG43 grid
On outer hanger points
Fig 4.4-12 FG43 grid showing main bridle points and safety points for a 3-wide array
Outer hanger positions for 2 or 3 cabinets per column - or for more down-tilt
34
3-wide Resolution 4 array using FG43 grid
On middle hanger points
Fig 4.4-13 FG43 grid showing main bridle points and safety points for a 3-wide array
Middle hanger positions for 1 or 2 cabinets per column - or for more up-tilt
35
Typical Resolution 4 layout using an FG53 grid
2 x Resolution 4 (plus an optional central Resolution 18)
Fig 4.4-14 FG53 grid with column hanger, tilt strap, bridle & safety points Fig 4.4-15 FG53 grid with column hanger, tilt strap, bridle & safety points
Outer positions for columns of 2 or 3 or more cabinets - or for more down-tilt Inner positions for columns of just 1 or 2 cabinets - or for more up-tilt
36
Typical Resolution 4 layout using an FG55 grid
3 x Resolution 4 (plus optional 2 x Resolution 18) on outer hanger points
Fig 4.4-16 FG55 grid showing main bridle points for a 3 x Resolution 4 columns (plus optional 2 x Resolution 18 columns as shown)
Outer hanger positions for 2 or 3 cabinets per column - or for more down-tilt
Unused bridle points (indicated with orange dots) may be used for safeties
37
Typical Resolution 4 layout using an FG55 grid
3 x Resolution 4 (plus optional 2 x Resolution 18) on inner hanger points
Fig 4.4-17 FG55 grid showing main bridle points for a 3 x Resolution 4 columns (plus optional 2 x Resolution 18 columns if required)
(Inner hanger positions for just 1 or 2 cabinets per column - or for more up-tilt)
Unused bridle points (indicated with orange dots) may be used for safeties
38
Typical FG55 house left grid layout – 2 x Resolution 4 (plus optional 2 x Resolution 18) on outer hanger points
(Note the CW55 counterweight position to offset the weight of the unused grid spoke. The final CW55 position is best determined on site)
Fig 4.4-18 FG55 grid showing main bridle points for a 2 x Resolution 4 columns (plus optional 2 x Resolution 18 columns as shown)
(Outer hanger positions for 3 cabinets per column - or for more down-tilt)
Unused bridle points (indicated with orange dots) may be used for safeties
39
Typical FG55 house right grid layout – 2 x Resolution 4 (plus optional 2 x Resolution 18) on outer hanger points
(Note the CW55 counterweight position to offset the weight of the unused grid spoke. The final CW55 position is best determined on site)
Fig 4.4-19 FG55 grid showing main bridle points for a 2 x Resolution 4 columns (plus optional 2 x Resolution 18 columns as shown)
(Outer hanger positions for 3 cabinets per column - or for more down-tilt)
Unused bridle points (indicated with orange dots) may be used for safeties
40
Typical FG55 house left grid layout – 2 x Resolution 4 (plus optional 2 x Resolution 18) on inner hanger points
(Note the CW55 counterweight position to offset the weight of the unused grid spoke. The final CW55 position is best determined on site)
Fig 4.4-20 FG55 grid showing main bridle points for a 2 x Resolution 4 columns (plus optional 2 x Resolution 18 columns as shown)
(Inner hanger positions for just 1 or 2 cabinets per column - or for more up-tilt)
Unused bridle points (indicated with orange dots) may be used for safeties
41
Typical FG55 house right grid layout – 2 x Resolution 4 (plus optional 2 x Resolution 18) on inner hanger points
(Note the CW55 counterweight position to offset the weight of the unused grid spoke. The final CW55 position is best determined on site)
Fig 4.4-21 FG55 grid showing main bridle points for a 2 x Resolution 4 columns (plus optional 2 x Resolution 18 columns as shown)
(Inner hanger positions for just 1 or 2 cabinets per column - or for more up-tilt)
Unused bridle points (indicated with orange dots) may be used for safeties
42
4.5 Resolution 4/5 touring system rigging procedure
Grid
The grid is lifted via a BR5 3-leg bridle and three Funktion One SG325 bow shackles
When the system is picked up by a motorised chain hoist (out of shot), the bridle
height allows room for the chain bag.
Fig 4.5-1 Grid spokes give the optimum horizontal splay angle
(20 degrees for Resolution 5, 40 degrees for Resolution 4)
Hand chain hoist
A hand operated 0.5T hand chain hoist (blue mechanism) forms the back leg of the bridle to enable simple grid
levelling.
The hand chain hoist’s drive chain should be tucked behind the guide bar provided.
Use the drive chain to ensure the grid is horizontal from the outset. This will make the array assembly easier.
Re-level as necessary during array assembly.
< Fig 4.5-2 Rear view of the grid with hand chain hoist attached via an SH325 bow shackle
43
The 5-way grid can also be used to fly three and four wide clusters – i.e. 5 x Resolution 5, or 3 x Resolution 4 with Resolution 18 in between
If a four wide cluster is required then the three bridle legs are moved to additional shackle points on the grid to retain balance. A CW55 16.5kg counter-weight is
available to offset the weight of the opposite unused spoke.
See plan views earlier…
The front bridle leg is attached to the appropriate grid point via a bow
shackle – see grid layouts (Figs 4.4-8 to 4.4-21) earlier.
For deep clusters (3-4 cabinets plus a downfill), hang the columns from the
front point on the spoke to counteract a deep cluster's tendency to develop
an upwards tilt.
For shallower clusters (1-2 cabinets plus a downfill), the top boxes can be
brought closer together by using the point further back on the spoke.
44
CH5 column hangers
CH5 column hangers are attached to the appropriate spoke of the grid by spring-loaded drop-
nose sword pins that are captive to the column hanger.
Tip!
Keep the sword pin’s drop-nose pivot point vertical to prevent the nose from
dropping inside the grid box section.
Pass the safety steel over the grid and secure in to the other side of the column
hanger place with a carbine (snap) hook.
45
Fig 4.5-6 Enclosures aligned near the grid Fig 4.5-7 Antiluce toggle pins on the enclosures ready to go...
Forward planning always makes rigging operations run more smoothly - especially if local crew are unfamiliar with the system.
Move your Resolution cabinets close to their final positions and float the grid (plus column hangers) at just the right height to align the cabinet toggle pins with
the column hangers.
Note
The dimensionally identical Res 4 and Res 18 enclosures can also be flown from this FG55 grid. Should the wider dispersion Resolution 4s be used they should only
be located on every other column - interspersed with Res 18s. We make several variants of this grid with increased horizontal angle between spokes specifically
designed for Resolution 4s on their own.
46
Fig 4.5-8 The integral antiluce toggle pins pass through holes in the CH5 column hangers.
47
Fig 4.5-9 Hanger attachment and locking procedure
48
The toggle pins should then be latched in place to secure the cabinet.
Fig 4.5-10 The toggle pin mated with CH5 column hanger - and repeated with each enclosure on the top row.
49
Fig 4.5-11 Attach tilting straps to the grid using the smaller sword pin Fig 4.5-12 Strap positions are marked with discs
(On a special fitting that forms part of the strap assembly)
These strap positions may be used for different vertical cabinet-to-cabinet splay angles – but should be left hanging freely from the grid at this point.
50
Fig 4.5-13 Raise the grid & move the next row of enclosures in place Fig 4.5-14 Wheelboards are removed by unfastening the flip catches
Note
Five Resolution 5 per row are shown
Three Resolution 4 plus two intermediate Resolution 18 per row will be the same width
51
Fig 4.5-15 Deploy the sprung flying tabs (from the cabinets above), place Fig 4.5-16 This is repeated for each enclosure in the second row
each one over the lower cabinet's toggle pins & securely latch each pin.
52
Fig 4.5-17 Enclosure-to-enclosure attachment and locking procedure
53
Fig 4.5-18 The 'Biscomatic' auto spacer must be set to achieve the required Fig 4.5-19 'Biscomatic' adjustment in 2.5° steps
vertical splay angle between enclosures
These inter-cabinet angles can easily be adjusted later without having to ground the cluster.
54
Fig 4.5-20 The array can then raised again ready for the Fig 4.5-21 The straps can be hooked into the
next row of Resolution enclosures bottom of the cluster and ratcheted to ensure
a neat array with aligned bottom corners
Note again
Five Resolution 5 per row are shown.
Three Resolution 4 plus two intermediate Resolution 18 per row will be the same width.
55
Adding Resolution 4D downfills
If downfills are required they can easily be added to the completed array.
Note that the Resolution 4D downfill cabinet has narrower horizontal coverage than the Resolution 4T but may be used beneath Resolution 4T/Resolution 18
combinations flown from FG53 or FG55 flying grids.
Fig 4.5-22 Again, sprung flying tabs are hinged out from the bottom of the cabinets above and mated with the downfills’ toggle pins
56
TS5 Tilt strap details
Fig 4.5-23 The TS5 lower strap hook is used to set the Resolution 4D downfill angle (Resolution 5 array shown).
Again, note that the Resolution 4D downfill cabinet has narrower horizontal coverage than the Resolution 4T but may be used beneath Resolution
4T/Resolution 18 combinations flown from FG53 or FG55 flying grids.
57
4.6 Stacking
Features:
Ingenious design facilitates safe, secure and accurate R4/5 ground stacking
Fast and Easy to set up
Fixed and optimised horizontal array angles
Vertical angle adjustment for controlled coverage
The variety of available boards provide
different stacking configurations for different environments
Interchangeable parts can be used on different boards
Overview:
Funktion One's Ground Stack board system provides a safe, secure and accurate method for ground stacking Resolution 4 and 5, E and Touring enclosures on a
variety of Funktion One bass. The System consists of a board which is clamped to the bass stack by mating brackets and secured by a strap that runs from the
lowest bass handle on one side, up and over the board and down to the lowest handle on the other side.
With the board attached to the bass (and the bass stack secure), various metal brackets are slotted into the board which provide quick to use attachment points
for the Resolution enclosures. The boards themselves have no permanent attachments making them easy to transport without snagging.
Resolution 4 boards provide the optimal 40° horizontal array angles between enclosures. Several different boards are available which provide for all of the most
commonly used stacking configurations. The metal mating parts and straps are common to all boards and can therefore be inter-changed.
Ground Stack Boards are usually supplied as complete kits but can be purchased on their own for users that want the flexibility of multiple stack configurations
with a common set of mating parts. Touring Resolution 4 enclosures can be safely stacked two high on top of the bass cabinets (assuming solid and flat ground)
using the board system combined with the integral flying linking hardware provided on the enclosures themselves.
Resolution 4E enclosures can be stacked one row high. All parts are common with the exception of the rear anchor and strap which are either dedicated to the
touring or E enclosures.
58
Stacking at a glance
Fig 4.6-1 Resolution 4/5T illustrated - Res 4 series and Res 5 series use similar techniques and many common parts
59
Resolution 4/5T stacking - rear view
(The Resolution 4T & 5T details are the same)
Overview
Straight, ratchet-adjustable GSS-ResT tilt strap
system available
Choice of GSB ground stack boards
GSM-Anchor and GSM-Clamp available
GSS-Bass ratchet strap available
Note
The Resolution 4/4T cabinets may also be used with:
The GSM-Anchor E tilt system which provides
greater declination than the touring anchor
The GSS-Res E strap system
60
Resolution 4/5E stacking - rear view
(The Resolution 4E & 5E details are the same)
GSM-Anchor E
Originally designed for use with the Resolution E enclosures,
which do not have the built in "Biscomatic", the E-Anchor
facilitates external downward tilt angle adjustment for both
Res 4/4E and Res 4/4T cabinets
GSS-ResE
This Y-strap is required for each anchor position.
Please note
Only one row of E enclosures can be deployed in this way
61
Resolution 4/5 series rear anchor options
62
Resolution 4T & 4E ground stacking board options
Fig 4.6-5 Loudspeaker-to-board clasps (front - in green) and anchors (rear- in orange)
See next page for a 2-way example showing how a GSB-A ground stack board is attached to various bass cabinet combinations…
63
GSB-A 2-wide ground stack board deployment with F221, F221 and F218
Fig 4.6-6 Ground stacking board-to-bass cabinet clasps (front – in green) and clamps (rear – in blue)
64
5 System design
5.1 Hearing safety
Design your system for good projection and coverage without overexposing specific audience areas to damaging levels. Individual audience members
should not be exposed to levels significantly greater than levels at the mix position.
Don’t place your ears too close to high power loudspeaker systems during system set-ups. Erroneous patching or un-muting by others could generate
unexpected and damaging sound pressure levels during set-up.
Wearing ear plugs may be a sensible precaution during system set-ups but remember that you have a duty of care towards the venue staff and the
audience. Mix engineers, DJs, subcontractors and venue management should not make system level and equalisation decisions whilst wearing ear plugs
as this could overexpose venue staff or the public in the vicinity
Hearing loss is cumulative and can result from long-term exposure to sound pressure levels as low as 85dBA. Installers and get-in crew should consider
long-term staff exposure when making high power loudspeaker placement and aiming decisions and managers should rotate staff - especially security
staff at the front of the audience - to minimise the exposure of any one group.
Check the relevant noise exposure/noise at work regulations and comply with them. If in doubt, seek expert advice.
65
If no noise exposure/noise at work regulation is available, we suggest the following LAeq* (A-weighted Equivalent Continuous spl) and peak spl limits for
staff:
*LAeq is referred to as dBA Leq on some meters
85dB LAeq - 8hrs
88dB LAeq - 4hrs
91dB LAeq - 2hrs
94dB LAeq - 1hr
97dB LAeq - 30mins
100dB LAeq - 15mins
Instantaneous/peak sound pressure levels must never exceed 137dB(C-weighted)
Leq is the average spl over a defined time period. We would suggest averaging and logging LAeq, and logging peak spl, over consecutive 10 minute
periods. LAeq may be logged with an integrating spl meter or by using a calibrated microphone and IO with the appropriate sound measurement
software.
Note!
We're not being party poopers here! Unweighted instantaneous sound pressure levels (especially where there's a solid bass presence) will be considerably
higher than the dBA LEQ figure which has significantly reduced LF and HF sensitivity and is averaged over a considerable time period.
The rules of thumb governing horizontal and vertical coverage are pretty simple. You can do the sums in your head.
Furthermore, with a bit of patch planning, you don't have to be stuck with fixed full-venue coverage when the venue is empty during a sound check. Once
you've aligned your coverage in all areas, it may be possible to reduce coverage to, for instance, the arena side seating for some periods of the sound check, to
enable the sound operator to concentrate on his mix without having to listen through empty room acoustics.
66
5.2.1 Horizontal coverage
Horizontal coverage is easy to calculate where Resolution 4 systems are flown from FG42, FG42, FG53 or FG55 grids with fixed horizontal splay angles.
The calculation for Resolution 4 array coverage is . . . 50° (Res 4 coverage) + the sum of the inter-cabinet angles provided by the flying grid.
Horizontal coverage examples:
1 x Res 4 = 50°
2 x Res 4 on FG42 is 50° (Res 4 coverage) + 45° (FG42 inter-cab angle) = 95°
2 x Res 4 on FG43, FG53 or FG55 is 50° (Res 4 coverage) + 40° (inter-cab angle) = 90°
3 x Res 4 on FG43 or FG55 is 50° (Res 4 coverage) + 2 x 40° (inter-cab angles) = 130°
Fig 5.2.1-1 2-wide 95° example on FG42 grid (Bridles & safeties not shown)
Note that the FG42 has a 45° inter-cabinet angle to cater for typical 2-wide high-tilt applications.
67
Fig 5.2.1-2 3-wide 130° example on FG43 grid (Bridles & safeties not shown)
68
5.2.2 Vertical coverage
69
Resolution 4T/Resolution 18 combinations (from FG53 or FG55 grids) with downfills
When calculating the full vertical coverage, including the downfill, we need to
take the following into account:
For the tight-packed downfill example shown here, the vertical coverage is:
62.5° + (10° + 12.5° + 0°*) = 85° Fig 5.2.2-2 3-deep + tight-packed downfill, 85° example
(*0° = tight-packed) (Bridles, safeties & tilting straps not shown)
Q. Why 62.5°? Why not 25° (Res 4) + 50° (Res 4D) = 75°?
A. Because of the 12.5° degree overlap when the downfill is at 0° (i.e. tight-packed to the lower Res 4).
70
Resolution 4T/Resolution 18 combinations (from FG53 or FG55 grids) with tilted downfills
For the example shown here, with a 5° splay angle between the downfill's
sloping top and the bottom of the lowest Resolution 4, the vertical coverage is:
62.5° + (10° + 12.5° + 5°) = 90°
71
5.2.3 Vertical coverage to suit venue profiles
Whether you're designing a large flown system for an arena or stadium or a smaller ground stacked system for a small festival stage or club, it's worth spending
a few minutes looking at the venue's sectional profile and working out column heights and angles in order to optimise audience coverage and minimise slap-
back.
Note that the following illustrations do not show full flying, stacking or bass clamping details. Refer to Section 4 for flying and stacking information.
Fig 5.2.3-1 1-high Resolution 4E in a small-medium club or music venue. Aimed between 2/3rds & full audience distance using E-Anchor.
Aiming just short of the furthest audience distance will provide smooth coverage whilst reducing slap-back from far walls. Systems may be aimed all the way
back, however, if the rear of the venue is acoustically absorbent or fitted with diffusers - or if the venue is outdoors, of course.
Resolution 4E cabinets must never be stacked more than one high as there are no vertical link facilities. Use Resolution 4T units if 2-high stacks are required.
72
Ground stacks - two high
Two-high Resolution 4T arrays can be ground stacked for large indoor clubs or music venues (again, clasped and strapped on a double height bass system, for
instance).
These are best mounted on a stage wing or riser to enable the bottom row to be placed just above audience head height and aimed approximately 1/3-1/2 way
into the audience whilst the top row is aimed between 2/3rds the full distance and the furthest audience area - depending on the acoustical characteristics of
the room.
Fig 5.2.3-2 2-high Resolution 4T in a larger club or music venue. The bottom section is aimed between 1/3 & 1/2 way back using an E-Anchor.
The top section is aimed between 2/3 & full audience distance using the inter-cabinet Biscomatic adjuster.
Aiming the top cabinets just short of the furthest audience distance will provide smooth coverage whilst reducing slap-back from far walls. Systems may, of
course, be aimed all the way back if the rear of the venue is acoustically absorbent or fitted with diffusers - or if the venue is outdoors.
For normal use, the inter-cabinet angle is best set between 10 and 15° using the Resolution 4T's Biscomatic adjuster. 10° gives very smooth cabinet-to-cabinet
transition over a wide audio bandwidth. Inter-cabinet angles less than 10° will give a slight inter-cabinet spl boost.
73
Flown arrays
Flown arrays must be designed by referring to a sectional view of the venue and adjusting vertical tilt and splay angles for smooth coverage.
Arrays for small flat-floor venues with no bleachers may be tilted to concentrate most of the sound coverage onto the audience areas and to avoid wall
reflections.
Fig 5.2.3-3 Two rows of Resolution 4T + Resolution 4D downfill for a flat-floor venue - tilted to avoid rear wall reflection (Exaggerated for clarity!)
(Note that the outer column hanger points are used to facilitate the tilt)
As with the stacked examples mentioned earlier, aiming the top cabinets just short of the furthest audience distance will provide smooth coverage whilst
reducing slap-back from far walls.
Systems may, of course, be aimed all the way back if the rear of the venue is acoustically absorbent or fitted with diffusers - or if the venue is outdoors.
Inter-cabinet angles between Resolution 4Ts are best set between 7.5 and 15° using the integral Biscomatic adjuster. 12.5° gives very smooth cabinet-to-cabinet
transition over a wide audio bandwidth. Inter-cabinet angles less than 12.5° will give a slight inter-cabinet spl boost.
74
Larger venues with bleachers or balconies may require more cabinets - and with smaller inter-cabinet angles - to cater for the increased vertical coverage and
longer throws required. Note that a smaller inter-cabinet angle is also used to cover the difficult floor-bleacher transition.
Fig 5.2.3-4 Three rows of Resolution 4T + Resolution 4D downfill for a venue with bleacher seating
As long as the rear seats aren't too high, arrays are often flown at the same height as the uppermost seats. This allows for easy height adjustment by eye.
Inter-cabinet splay angles are set for a smooth inter-cabinet coverage transition to avoid mid-bleacher hot-spots or floor-bleacher transition weak areas.
Note that one row's aim is designated "floor/mix position". When given a choice, most sound engineers tend to prefer their mix position to be on axis of one
row of cabinets. Although this is not strictly necessary with correctly splayed Funktion One systems, a designated on-axis position saves unnecessary on-site
discussions.
75
3-wide, 2-deep Resolution 4T array
Typical Resolution 4T array used in combination with a Resolution 5T main systems
to cover arena side seating.
Horizontal
For this 3-wide example, the horizontal coverage is:
50° + (40° + 40°) = 130°
Vertical
And the 3-deep + 5° tilted downfill columns give a vertical coverage of:
25° + (12.5°) = 37.5°
Overall coverage
Overall coverage for this 3-wide, 3-deep array with tilted downfills is:
130° wide x 37.5° deep
Fig 5.2.3-5 3-wide, 2-deep example
(Bridles, safeties & tilting straps not shown)
76
5.3 Typical bass systems and alignment
Resolution 4 systems are often used with Funktion One F218, F218 + IB218, F121 and F221 bass
systems. It is also possible to fly Resolution 18 bass systems with Resolution 4 systems as Resolution
18 systems are dimensionally identical and incorporate the same integral flying system.
Resolution 18 features:
Identical size to Resolution 4 and 5 for use in arrays
Funktion One designed Neodymium driver
Built-in flying hardware
Supplied with protective wheelboard
Optional scrim for discrete appearance
18" driver
40Hz-250Hz Frequency response
103dB - 1W at 1m
450W AES power
8Ω
NL4 connector & captive lead in cable recess. Driver on 1+/-
F218 features:
Proven loading design with latest Andrews’ tuning Fig 5.3-1 Resolution 18
Funktion One designed drivers
Integral handles
Optional throat grilles
Optional wheels nest inside flare of adjacent enclosure
Optional lightweight Neodymium magnets
2 x 18" drivers
45Hz-280Hz Frequency response
105dB - 1W at 1m
900W AES power
2 x 8Ω in parallel = 4Ω
2 x NL4 connectors in parallel. One driver on 1+/-, the other on 2+/-
Fig 5.3-2 F218
77
Infrabass 218 features:
Dual Funktion One designed 18” drivers with 5” voice-coils
Dimensionally identical to F218
Includes a curved stainless steel grill
Integral handles
Optional wheels
x 18" drivers
20Hz-80Hz Frequency response
103dB - 1W at 1m
1200W AES power Fig 5.3-3 Infrabass 218
x 8Ω in parallel (4Ω)
2 x NL4 connectors in parallel. One driver on 1+/-, the other on 2+/2-
Infrahorn features:
Increases efficiency, directivity and projection of a pair of Infrabass
(Extra 10dB at 33Hz)
Optional wheels available
78
F121 features:
Advanced Andrews' loading
High output from moderately sized enclosure
Funktion One designed driver with Neodymium magnet
Integral handles
Optional throat grille, wheels and pole mount
21" driver
40Hz-250Hz Frequency response
105dB - 1W at 1m
750W AES power
4Ω or 8Ω
2 x NL4 connectors in parallel. Driver on 1+/- Fig 5.3-5 F121
F221 features:
Advanced Andrews' tuning
Funktion One designed drivers with Neodymium magnets
Integral handles
Optional throat grilles
Optional wheels nest inside flare of adjacent enclosure
2 x 21" drivers
40Hz-250Hz Frequency response
107dB - 1W at 1m
1500W AES power
2 x 8Ω in parallel = 4Ω or 2 x 4Ω in parallel = 2Ω
2 x NL4 connectors in parallel. One driver on 1+/-, the other on 2+/-
79
How many?
It's quite usual to use Funktion One bass cabinets and top cabinets on a 1:1 basis, i.e. one dual bass cabinet (F218 or F221) for each Resolution 4 main cabinet.
But it really depends on the audience area to be covered and the type of bass response and headroom required.
A 1:1 ratio keeps your F218 or F221 bass system within a dB or two of your Resolution 4's low-mid section sensitivity so the recommended crossover settings in
Section 7.5 will be optimum.
Place your bass systems as close as possible to your main arrays - directly beneath the main flown arrays whenever possible
Make your bass stack width similar to your main array width. Similar widths will provide similar dispersion patterns through crossover. For example 2 x
F218 or 2 x F221 wide for a 3 x Resolution 4 width - see below…
If safety considerations (for example, uneven ground) don't allow bass arrays to be stacked high, you need to spread them considerably wider than the
main array. Where your bass system has to be significantly wider that the main array, arrange the bass cabinets in an arc so that they follow the arc of
the main array on a common rear point to avoid beaming. They can then be delayed, if necessary, to time and phase align them with the Resolution 4s
and will provide a similar dispersion through the crossover region. Also see Compensating for positional offsets later…
Fig 5.3-7 3 x Resolution 4 array (on FG43 spacing) over 2 x F218 wide bass stack
80
Smoothing bass coverage
It is always worth allowing for some extra bass cabinets between left and right systems to smooth coverage and avoid a "bass alley" effect up the centre of the
venue.
There isn't often a budget for a multitude of closely spaced bass cabinets right along the stage apron – so one solution for smaller stages is to retain some of the
bass cabinets from each side and space these inner 2-wide bass arrays equidistant along the stage apron as shown below…
81
Point destination alignment
Fig 5.3-9 Mix position alignment provides maximum mix position impact
For larger stages you should probably think about adding a 2-wide splayed block every 6-10m or so. These also provide a handy support for front fills.
82
Planar alignment
Fig 5.3-10 Off-centre alignment provides smooth bass coverage and reduces the central bass peak
83
5.3.1 Directional bass arrays and why you may not need to use them
Directional bass arrays should be used with caution. They are rarely required with Funktion One bass systems because Funktion One bass systems are designed
for maximum broadband efficiency.
Q. Why is broadband efficiency important?
A. Unfortunately, the answer is a bit drawn out – but please bear with us. We experience the most realistic impact from a sound system when a
sound wave effects our whole body, not just our ears. The most effective way of doing this is to design systems to convert as much amplifier
power into sound intensity (sound power per unit area) as possible – and over as wide a bandwidth as possible.
Although sound engineers and manufacturers tend to specify loudspeaker performance in terms of the resulting sound pressure, sound power is
actually made up of two components; particle velocity and sound pressure. It’s analogous to electrical power being the product of current and
voltage and time-averaged intensity appears to be important whether you’re trying to excite your audience with a larger than life kick drum
sound or you’re trying to convey plucked strings without running your orchestral reinforcement system into low frequency feedback.
To get maximum power, the two components (velocity and pressure or current and voltage) need to be in phase over as wide a bandwidth as
possible, so resonances must be avoided. And, to achieve maximum power transfer, the source impedance needs to match the load impedance.
There is usually a significant mismatch between the acoustic impedances (pressure ÷ velocity) of direct radiating loudspeakers and the all-
important air that conveys the loudspeaker signal to the audience but the match can be improved with careful loudspeaker design, especially if
horn-loading is used, as the horn will act like a matching transformer.
The increasing availability of high power amplifiers and the improvement in loudspeaker materials has led many manufacturers to abandon their
quest for efficiency. Unfortunately, these inefficiencies can’t simply be overcome by applying more power so the current trend isn’t very clever.
We hear sound pressure, but that sound pressure is caused by the sound power that’s transferred to us. If the power transfer is inefficient, that
important pressure-velocity relationship is compromised and the resultant sound pressure will lack impact. This can often be seen as excessive
phase vs frequency changes over the system bandwidth – over and above the usual boundary and distance effects. It’s why horn loaded mid-bass
systems tend to have more impact than direct radiating systems – even if both systems are tweaked for identical amplitude responses.
Most sound engineers will attempt to get the impact they want by driving an inefficient (and already heavily powered) bass system even harder
– either by turning it up, tweaking the eq., or a combination of both. This causes more leakage behind the system and has led to the current
popularity of cardioid bass configurations.
Cardioid bass configurations are obviously going to be popular with a lot of loudspeaker manufacturers as they can generate extra profits by
selling you more speakers to deal with the adverse effects of having to drive their systems so hard in the first place. And power amplifier
manufacturers probably can’t believe their luck!
However, if you still feel you must use a directional bass array to deal with local anomalies, please be aware of the following pros and cons…
84
5.3.2 Types of cardioid/end-fired systems & their pros and cons
There are two main types of popular directional systems but very few users seem to understand their pros and cons.
Important note!
Although this polarity-reversed cardioid configuration gives the best rear cancellation - the front-to-back ratio is usually 15-20dB over a broad frequency range -
it compromises audience impact due to its inferior attack and its inferior forward summation at the upper and lower cut-off frequencies.
A better in-phase, end-fired cardioid arrangement will give reasonable rear bass suppression can be achieved without compromising audience impact.
Read on…
85
In-phase end-fired cardioids
This alternative cardioid/end-fired set-up provides better, broad-band audience impact.
This in-phase deployment gives the best forward impact and bandwidth – but at the expense of rear cancellation.
Front-to-back ratio is usually around 15dB at the spacing/delay frequency but tends to be more frequency dependent than a classic, polarity-reversed cardioid –
reducing to 5-6dB or less towards the lower and upper cut-off frequencies. But note the improved forward characteristic!
86
5.3.3 Compensating for positional offsets
There are two distinct stages to delay-aligning bass and main systems successfully.
1) Physical offset/time alignment
Measure the relative distances to the bass and main systems from a representative position in the room - usually the mix position, but, if there is no
auditorium mix position, 2/3rd across the audience or dance floor area - and delay the required section by 2.91ms for every metre of physical offset.
2) Phase alignment - at the representative listening position (usually the mix position)
This fine adjusts for phase shifts and their resultant group delays. This can be caused by bass enclosure physics, crossover topologies and/or sound
reflecting off nearby boundaries, arriving late and vector summing with the direct sound to create an overall phase lag.
Note that the above time alignment must be done first.
If you jump straight in with phase alignment, before you've compensated for physical offsets, you could end up a whole cycle out at crossover!
It's also worth checking your signal paths (amplifier, controller settings etc) to make sure everything is in-phase before you start.
a) Set up a pink noise or musical signal through a graphic equaliser with all its bands fully attenuated except the bass-main crossover frequency -
set the crossover frequency slider to full boost. Make sure you use this 1/3 octave signal and not a sine wave oscillator…
b) Using this crossover-tuned signal, switch between your main and bass systems and balance their levels.
c) Now temporarily switch the bass system out of phase and, with both main and bass systems on, fine adjust the delay for a null in level.
(Note that you are unlikely to hear a complete cancellation in a real room)
d) Now - and this is most important - switch the bass system back to the correct polarity!!!
87
6 Connector pin-outs and cables
6.1 EP-6 connector pin-outs
Resolution 4T, 4E and 4D
The Resolution 4T and 4E systems employ Amphenol EP series connectors.
The captive inter-cabinet/input lead connector is an EP-6-12 6-pole nickel finish male line plug
The chassis link out connector is an EP-6-13P 6-pole nickel finish female chassis socket
Resolution 4T and 4E
Pin Function Driver terminal
1 Low-mid 12" -ve
2 Low-mid 12" +ve
3 High-mid 8" -ve
4 High-mid 8" +ve
5 High 1" -ve
6 High 1" +ve
Fig 6.1-2 Resolution 4T/4E pin-out
88
Resolution 4D
Pin Function Driver terminal
1 Link through Link through
2 Link through Link through
3 High-mid 8" -ve
4 High-mid 8" +ve
5 High 1" -ve
6 High 1" +ve
Fig 6.1-3 Resolution 4D pin-out
(For bass system NL4 pin-outs, see features lists in previous section)
89
Low loss cable runs
The following table gives the maximum cable lengths allowable to keep level losses below 0.6dB.
90
Loudspeakers with the same polarity will give:
Good bass extension
Good bass impact
Good “between the speakers” stereo imaging with a smooth central transition
Solid centre-panned vocal imaging
Loudspeakers with opposing polarities will give the following, depending on which section (bass, low-mid, high-mid or high) is incorrectly set up:
Poor bass extension
No bass impact
Poor “between the speakers” imaging. Just hard left or hard right “distant” effects
No solid central vocal image. Centre-panned vocals will sound indistinct or thin and, again, the “distant” effect will be evident.
91
It is usually fairly easy to ensure that your loudspeakers are wired to the same polarity if all your loudspeakers are being driven via identical signal paths and
equipment. Simply check that the same loudspeaker cable core colours are wired to the same + or – pins at the amplifier end and at the loudspeaker connector
end.
If you cannot be certain that your signal paths are identical – you may be using a mix of old and new equipment or equipment from different manufacturers, for
instance – it makes sense to check out the system using a polarity checker.
A good polarity checker, such as the Funktion One ASPC1, will allow you to check not only your amplifier-loudspeaker combinations but also the entire signal
path including mixers and crossover connections.
Pulse generator
XLR pulse generator output
LED pulse indicator
Detector
Built in microphone
LED polarity indicators
General
Belt pouch included
Batteries included
User Instruction Card
Fig 6.3-3 Funktion One polarity checker
The ASPC1 is a two-part system comprising a pulse generator and a detector. The pulse generator allows you to inject a special test signal anywhere in the signal
path whilst the detector microphone lets you check the resulting loudspeaker polarity acoustically. See the ASPC1 user guide for more information.
92
Absolute polarity and live sound
Maintaining absolute polarity through a sound system means not only making sure all your loudspeakers are “in phase” but also ensuring that your
microphones give a positive-going output voltage for a positive-going pressure, that there are no polarity reversals anywhere in the signal path and that your
loudspeaker systems provide a positive pressure in response to that positive-going signal.
Many natural sound sources, especially percussion and vocals, produce asymmetrical waveforms. It makes sense to ensure that a positive-going percussive
impact creates a positive-going pressure for the audience to maintain that all-important bodily impact. Some recording engineers are also adamant that vocals
overlay the band more clearly if absolute polarity is maintained.
Common sense, then, suggests that, as long as we’re using polarity-matched microphones and well-documented signal paths, why not maintain absolute
polarity – if only for consistency?
93
Cabling
Use only Funktion One recommended loudspeaker connectors wired so that the cables have adequate strain relief for their intended purpose and so
that conductors are fully shrouded
Use the appropriate cable conductor gauge. See section 6.2
Ensure that your cables are in good condition and free from damage
Ensure that there are no loose conductor strands to short out and create a fire hazard
If you re-use older cables, strip them back a little, wherever possible, to expose clean conductor ends that are free from corrosion
Use fire retardant or low emission cables where these have been specified by the contract or by local safety regulations
Keep connectors away from flammable furnishings as connectors can get hot under fault conditions
Amplification
We suggest electronically limiting maximum long-term and peak amplifier power to comply with the system's maximum power ratings. See section 3.2
Remember that heavily clipped signals can double a power amplifier’s output. See appendix A
If heavily clipped signals are expected due to equipment with inadequate headroom in the signal path, inexperienced operators etc., set rms and peak
output limiter thresholds 3dB below the loudspeaker’s AES ratings. See sections 7.6 & 7.7
Keep amplifier racks properly ventilated and well away from flammable furnishings
General
There are no user-serviceable parts inside your Resolution 4 system. Refer servicing to Funktion One approved service facilities only. Contact Funktion
One if in doubt
94
7.2 Choosing a power amplifier
Long-term power ratings
Modern loudspeaker drivers are specified to an AES standard. This specifies their long-term (typically 2 hour) band-limited AES power rating. The band limits are
usually chosen to match the drivers' intended use via a suitable crossover system.
A further enhancement is to use both long-term and peak limiters. The long-term limiter is set to the driver's AES power rating and an additional look-ahead
peak limiter (e.g. the D-Max clip limiter in the Funktion One XO4 or XO4A Audio Management System) is set to the amplifier's peak output, or to 6dB above the
long-term limiter, whichever is the lowest. This will protect the driver from being overdriven on peaks whilst preventing audible clipping.
It is ok to set limiters below the driver's power ratings - to maintain spectral balance at limiting, for instance - but limiters must never be set above the Funktion
One on-line calculations.
See Sections 7.6 and 7.7.
95
Recommended power ranges
Always use Funktion One loudspeaker management systems with correctly set crossovers filters and limiters. See sections 7.5 - 7.7.
The following tables show recommended power ranges. The lower figure in each case is the power required to meet the driver's AES power rating. The upper
figure in each case is the power required to meet the driver's peak power rating.
Always use long-term limiters set to suit the driver's AES power. This will prevent extended periods of over-powering or clipping but still allow peak
signals to be passed unhindered
Choose power amplifiers capable of delivering the upper figure where budgets allow. This will prevent the amplifier running out of headroom before
peak performance is reached
Use look-ahead peak limiters (e.g. the D-Max clip limiters in the Funktion One XO4) if they are available
Note
Unless otherwise stated, power ratings in this section are average power (rms voltage x rms current – sometimes called "rms power").
96
7.3 Recommended Funktion One power amplifiers
Note
The Funktion One XO4 loudspeaker management system (with D-Max peak limiting) is recommended for optimal system control
E-series and F-series amplifiers have opposing airflows. If E-series and F-series amplifiers are mounted in the same rack, always place the F-series at the
top to ensure correct ventilation
Notes
The power amplifier model chosen to drive the Low-mid and High-mid sections may also be used to drive the High section as long as suitable long-term and
peak (D-Max) limiters are set using a Funktion One XO4 loudspeaker management system.
Resolution systems are an easy load for most amplifiers due to their high in-band impedances so up to five cabinets may be linked in parallel.
97
7.3.1 Amplifier output pin-outs
Funktion One Amplifier socket Speakon
amplifier type Function connector pin Recommended cable plug & notes
E15, E45 or E90 Channel A out
2-ch amplifier Ch A 1+ NL2 - Ch A only on 2-pole connector
1-
Channel B out
Ch B 1+ NL2 - Ch B only on 2-pole connector
1-
Bridge/stereo out (Stereo mode) (Make sure amplifier is in stereo mode)
Ch A 1+ NL4 - Chs A & B on same 4-pole connector
1-
Ch B 2+
2-
98
Amplifier socket
Funktion One amplifier type Function Speakon connector pin Recommended cable plug & notes
Channel A parallel
Ch A 1+, 2+ NL2 - Ch A on 2-core cable (+ve on 1+, -ve on 1-) …or…
1-, 2- NL4 - Ch A on 4-core cable
(+ve on 1+ & 2+, -ve on 1- & 2- to reduce cable impedance)
Channel B out
Ch B 1+, 2+ NL2 - Ch A on 2-core cable (+ve on 1+, -ve on 1-) …or…
1-, 2- NL4 - Ch A on 4-core cable
(+ve on 1+ & 2+, -ve on 1- & 2- to reduce cable impedance)
Channel B parallel
Ch B 1+, 2+ NL2 - Ch A on 2-core cable (+ve on 1+, -ve on 1-) …or…
1-, 2- NL4 - Ch A on 4-core cable
(+ve on 1+ & 2+, -ve on 1- & 2- to reduce cable impedance)
99
7.4 Rack patch examples with Funktion One XO2 or XO4/4A control
Fig 7.4-1 Resolution 4 rack schematic using XO2 controller and E-series amplifiers - rear view
(Each amplifier outlet can drive up to five Resolution 4 series cabinets)
All of these rack layout examples follow the loudspeaker topology and left-right deployment. For instance, the first example (above) has the low-mid amplifier
at the bottom, the high-mid in the centre and the high amplifier at the top. It also has the left controls on the front left and the right controls on the front right.
100
Fig 7.4-2 Resolution 4 rack schematic using XO4/4A controller and E-series amplifiers - rear view
(Each amplifier outlet can drive up to five Resolution 4 series cabinets)
The 8-output XO4 or XO4A is set up for 2 x 4-way crossovers. Bass signals on outputs 1 and 5 are made available on IO panel XLRs. See panel example here.
101
Fig 7.4-3 Resolution 4 (+ bass) rack schematic using XO4/4A controller and E-series amplifiers - rear view
(Each amplifier outlet can drive up to five Resolution 4 series cabinets)
This configuration ensures accurate Resolution 4 - to - bass system alignment via the XO4 or XO4A system controller.
102
Fig 7.4-4 Resolution 4 (+ bass) rack schematic using XO4/4A controller and E-series amplifiers - rear view
(Each amplifier outlet can drive up to five Resolution 4 series cabinets)
This configuration allows operators to develop separate bass mixes, allowing some instruments mics prone to LF feedback to be kept out of the bass mix.
Note that the auxiliary bass mix output level must be calibrated for optimum Resolution 4 - to - bass system alignment.
103
Panel kits
104
7.5 Crossover settings
See next section for limiter settings.
The following tables list the recommended crossover filter and relative gain settings for Resolution 4 series system and the Resolution 4D downfill when used
with F118/218, Resolution 18 or F121/221 bass systems.
These settings can also be found on the Funktion One web site.
Check:
www.funktion-one.com/crossover-settings/resolution-5/ for the latest Resolution 4 settings
www.funktion-one.com/crossover-settings/resolution-4/ for the latest Resolution 4 settings
Resolution 4T, 4E and 4S with F218 or Resolution 18 - with or without the optional Infrabass (Infrabass settings in red)
Resolution 4T, 4E & 4S tri-amped Delay (mS) Polarity High Pass High Pass Low Pass Low Pass Relative Gain (dB)
Freq (Hz) Type Freq (Hz) Type
Optional Infrabass 218 6 + 20 24dB But 45 24dB LR +10
F218 or Resolution 18 0 + 20 (no Infrabass) 24dB But 114 24dB LR +8
45 (with Infrabass) 24dB LR
12" 1.500 + 114 24dB LR 445 24dB LR +5
8" 3.390 + 445 24dB LR 5k77 24dB LR 0
1" 3.632 - 5k55 24dB LR 32k 24dB LR -3
(Resolution 4D also uses above 8” & 1”
settings when used with F118/F218)
Resolution 4T, 4E & 4S bi-amped (passive HF) Delay (mS) Polarity High Pass High Pass Low Pass Low Pass Relative Gain (dB)
Freq (Hz) Type Freq (Hz) Type
18" 0 + 20 24dB But 114 24dB LR +8
12" 1.500 + 114 24dB LR 445 24dB LR +5
8" + 1” 3.390 + 445 24dB LR 32k 24dB LR -1
Fig 7.5-1 Resolution 4T, 4E and 4S crossover settings for use with F118, F218, Resolution 18 and Infrabass
105
Resolution 4T, 4E and 4S with F121/221 bass system
Resolution 4T, 4E & 4S tri-amped Delay (mS) Polarity High Pass High Pass Low Pass Low Pass Relative Gain (dB)
Freq (Hz) Type Freq (Hz) Type
21" 0 + 20 24dB But 125 24dB LR +8
12" 2.000 + 125 24dB LR 445 24dB LR +5
8" 3.890 + 445 24dB LR 5k77 24dB LR 0
1" 4.132 - 5k55 24dB LR 32k 24dB LR -3
(Resolution 4D also uses above 8” & 1”
settings when used with F121/F221)
Resolution 4T, 4E & 4S bi-amped (passive HF) Delay (mS) Polarity High Pass High Pass Low Pass Low Pass Relative Gain (dB)
Freq (Hz) Type Freq (Hz) Type
21" 0 + 20 24dB But 114 24dB LR +8
12" 2.000 + 114 24dB LR 445 24dB LR +5
8" + 1” 3.890 + 445 24dB LR 32k 24dB LR -1
Fig 7.5-2 Resolution 4T, 4E and 4S crossover settings for use with F121 and F221
Note!
Always check your power amplifier's specifications and settings before assuming it is 32dB.
106
Limiter setting for amplifiers with 32dB gain
Main long-term limit threshold Attack/ decay D-Max clip limiter for XO series controller
Resolution 4T, 4E & 4S
(dBu) for XO series (dB over)
controller
12" +4dBu Auto +6dB
8" +5dBu Auto +6dB
2 x 1" -1dBu Auto +6dB
Resolution 4D Main long-term limit threshold Attack/ decay D-Max clip limiter for XO series controller
(dBu) for XO series (dB over)
controller
8" +5dBu Auto +6dB
1" -1dBu Auto +6dB
Fig 7.6-1 Resolution 4T, 4E and 4S limiter settings for amplifiers with 32dB gain
Initial limiter settings for amplifiers with other voltage gains - using the Funktion One on-line calculator
Recommended limiter settings for Resolution 4 series systems and Resolution 4D downfills used with power amplifiers with other voltage gain settings can be
obtained using Funktion One's on-line calculator.
If you're on line, simply go to http://www.funktion-one.com/settings/ and then scroll down for the
Limiter Setting Calculator
107
Once you're at the Calculator part of the Funktion One page, enter the relevant figures into the left hand column and click Calculate. The recommended
limiter setting and total load impedance presented to the power amplifier will be indicated in the right hand windows. See following example…
Example
Figures for Resolution 4 Low-mid must be entered on the left. Limiter setting and impedance will appear on right after Calculate is clicked.
Note again!
Always check your power amplifier's specifications and settings to find out what the true voltage gain is.
Although Resolution 4 series loudspeakers are 3-way active systems and less prone to damage than a full-range passive system would be, it is worth reducing
the initial limiter thresholds by 3dB (e.g. +1dB instead of +4dB etc) to prevent premature ageing of components (particularly HF drivers) when renting out your
system for an amateur DJ competition, for a particularly animated preacher or for a particularly raucous comedian, for instance.
* Limiter thresholds may be reduced below the initial settings - to cater for clipped source material or for good spectral balance - but they must never be
increased as this would defeat the system protection and could result in prematurely aged or permanently damaged drivers.
108
For more about clipping, see Appendix A towards the end of this user guide.
Mid and high frequency drivers tend to have lighter, more delicate voice coils and smaller magnetic assemblies than lower frequency elements, heat up much
faster and, therefore, have lower power ratings.
However, these lower power ratings with increasing frequency don't usually restrict the mid and high frequency output spl because:
1) Mid and high frequency horns can be designed for very high efficiency and
2) Natural music and speech signals tend to have quite a "pink" rms spectrum - i.e. signal levels tend to reduce slightly with increasing frequency
Not all amplified material is "natural" - we're a creative species. Most club-goers love sound systems with lots of that classic Funktion One bass impact and this
means that, as levels rise (and despite the mids and highs having lower power ratings), the bass system is often the first to go into limit leaving the mids an
highs to carry on increasing in level.
It is often, therefore, a good idea to reduce the limiter thresholds of some sections (most likely the mids and highs) slightly to maintain the required spectral
balance right into limit and to protect your audience from discomfort.
109
In all these cases the limiters are set for system safety and nothing gets broken, all good but what does the system actually sound like and how loud is it when
the limiters come into play?
Mid and HF horns are usually more efficient than low mid and bass drivers. Of course they handle less power but you can often get a situation where if
everything is just set for safety the system is capable of being driven into a state of imbalance where it sounds bad and can even be way too loud for the venue
and the safety of the people in it.
Bass speakers these days can handle a massive amount of power (as long as it's clean) so large amps are used and limiters set to stop clip from occurring.
Mid and high limiters are set progressively tighter in respect to the drivers lesser power handling.
It's still a good idea to use a large amp though. Transient spikes, totally valid to the music like the hit of the snare or cymbal crashes can get past the limiters and
this is good because the dynamics and excitement of the music are preserved and these transients are not long enough to overpower the driver as long as they're
not clipping.
The thing to do here is to reduce the limiter threshold settings still further so that the mids and highs start to limit at around the same point as the bass. This way
the frequency content of the music will be maintained when the system is being pushed into limit and the mids will stay at a level where they still relate to the
low end.
The settings for this will be different for live and club systems. You will still, of course, want to leave a bit more headroom for the dynamics of live music and in a
night club there may be noise restrictions or the owner may have an idea of how loud he wants the system to go.
The principle is the same. In both cases run the system up to the required maximum level, reduce the limiters so that the limit lights are flashing then open up a
dB or so to account for when the room is warm and full of people, come back later when the venue is running and fine tune if needed. Above all, lock the system
to safeguard against tampering!
Your system will now not only be safe against damage, but will also be safe against being driven out of balance and sounding really bad.
110
Appendix A - Clipping
Caution
Prolonged heavy clipping can subject loudspeaker voice coils and passive crossover components to double their rated power dissipation leading to overheating,
premature ageing or early failure. The high frequency components are particularly vulnerable in systems with passive crossovers.
In extreme cases this could pose a fire hazard.
The blue positive and negative shaded areas represent the power the signal would cause to be dissipated in a load – usually a loudspeaker voice coil.
Here’s the same signal amplified beyond the available “headroom” – i.e. beyond the clip level...
111
Signal amplified beyond clip level
When a signal is clipped, its waveform squares off.
The cross-hatched areas cover a significantly larger area because the signal stays at the maximum positive and negative values for more each cycle. This is easier
to see if we overlay the normal and clipped waveform illustrations. The clipped signal’s extra content can be seen as the extra red shaded areas.
In extreme cases, the waveform is so heavily clipped that it can resemble a square wave. This increases the rms voltage delivered to the loudspeaker to √2
(approx 1.4142) times what would be expected.
112
The power delivered to the loudspeaker is dependent on the rms voltage2.
√2 x √2 = 2 so the power delivered to your loudspeakers is doubled!
Note that, in all cases, the two waveforms have similar peak voltage levels so this extra energy doesn’t always show up on digital audio systems where meters
are usually calibrated with respect to maximum digital level (full scale). This is usually written as dBFS.
Digital level meters don’t usually take the shape of the waveform (and its potential voice coil heating effect!) into account - hence the warning at the beginning
of this Appendix.
To avoid overheating loudspeaker voice coils – particularly HF voice coils in passive loudspeaker systems – try not to clip signals repeatedly or for long
periods.
113
1kHz pure tone just below clip level
(Vertical = level in decibels, horizontal = frequency)
The spectrum (above) is that of an undistorted pure tone. Note the single, pure, frequency point.
Now see what happens when you clip a signal…
The heavily clipped signal on the next page shows clipping distortion as a series of odd harmonics at 3kHz, 5kHz, 7kHz etc., whose levels decrease with frequency
at approximately 6dB per octave. Where clipping occurs before the system crossover, clipping harmonics can crossover into the HF driver and the HF driver can
be called upon to dissipate far more power than normal.
114
1kHz heavily clipped signal
Note that the example shows a single frequency fundamental. Musical signals will be a lot more complex and the distortion content will be denser. Asymmetrical
clipping (from studio or backline valve amplifiers, for instance) would also include even harmonics.
As mentioned earlier, long-term clipping can be avoided – and performance improved - if you choose mixers, effects units, controllers and amplifiers with
adequate headroom and set your limiter thresholds to below clipping levels. You can also avoid clipping your signals at source by setting your console and effects
system “gain structure” carefully. See appendix B...
115
Appendix B – Gain structure
What is gain structure all about and why is it important?
When an audio signal passes through an analogue or digital audio system, it is important to maintain the optimum signal operating level through the various
sections of the signal path. Microphone levels must be boosted to make them compatible with line level and analogue-to-digital converter stages and mix stages
must allow enough headroom for multi-channel summation.
The various gain settings throughout a piece of audio equipment are collectively known the system’s gain structure.
116
To make matters worse, any over-sampling or delay-based processes built into effects units, can stretch these nasty artefacts in the time domain and make them
far more audible than their relatively low levels would suggest. Also remember that aliasing will be compounded as the overloaded signal passes through
successive processes.
117
Understanding level meters
This section spends a lot of time discussing meters because, without an understanding of their typical calibration levels, it’s difficult to get your gain structure
and operating levels properly optimised.
Professional live sound meters calibrated with respect to “Full Scale” (dBFS)
Too low (-28dBFS) Too high (-3dBFS) Just right (-18dBFS) Peak-hold option
Wasting dynamic range Peaks could be clipped Noise-free without clipping May not be true peak
The illustrations above show levels on a typical bar meter with a dedicated peak LED at the top. Some analogue peak LEDs don’t respond to very fast transients
and some digital ones don’t respond until the processor has seen several maximum bits in a row. Peak-hold indicators often hold maximum rms – not true
waveform peaks – so they are not always a good indicator of potential clipping.
If, for live sound, your bar meter is way above the -18dB mark, you’re probably clipping peaks and transients irrespective of what the peak LED or peak-hold
indicator is telling you.
118
Q&A
Q) Surely 18dB below clipping (-18dBFS) won’t drive my loudspeaker system hard enough?
A) Remember that 18dB below clipping represents about +4dBu/0VU output level on most pro-audio consoles.
Effects, eq., mixing and natural performance dynamics will require the 18dB of headroom through your channel, effects and subgroup sections.
Lower-cost digital console calibration and limited converter quality may push you towards an operating level only 12 to 9dB (-12 to -9dBFS) below
clipping as mentioned earlier. -9dBFS is an old DIN standard but it’s the exception rather than the rule – particularly with modern 24-bit systems.
Once you’ve done all this without crashing the mix, you can then use the master faders to push the required level to your main system amplifier racks
where your controller limiters will take care of the odd rogue peak.
Standard EBU alignment level for digital audio is also 18dB below full scale (maximum digital level) - usually written as -18dBFS - so sticking to the 18dB rule will
also make you compatible with broadcasters when working at festivals and VIP DJ events.
Too low (-10VU = 28dB below clip) Too high Just right (0VU = 18dB below clip)
Wasting dynamic range Peaks could be heavily clipped Noise-free without clipping
119
More Qs & As
Q) What’s a dBu?
A) dBu (sometimes written as dBv) refers to so many dB with respect to approximately 0.775vrms. You’ve probably seen the 0.775vrms standard used for
power amplifier sensitivity.
UK “BBC” PPM scale – in 4dB steps EBU PPM scale – also in 4dB steps
“4” is usually set for -18dBFS “Test” is usually set for -18dBFS
There are almost as many PPM scales as there are broadcasting authorities – including a “DIN” standard - where “0” is only -9dBFS!
PPMs move faster than most rms meters in response to tone-bursts and fall back more slowly – making them easier to read. But they still underestimate very
short bursts and often ignore transients altogether so the 18dB below clip rule must still apply.
120
K-meters
K-meters – named after Bob Katz, the well-known
mastering engineer – usually measure rms levels
with a fixed 600ms integration and fall-back time
over a very wide level range.
121
Gain structure basics for live sound console users
1: Ensure that all inserts, gates, compressors or plug-ins are bypassed before initially setting your gain structure! See Outboards effects set-up later...
2: Adjust your input channel mic/line gains for PFL (pre-fade listen) levels around +4dBu/0VU (analogue), -18dBFS (digital) or the top green indicator (DJ)
You may need to trim input gains if the input levels change dramatically during the set. Remember that musicians tend to play louder with an excitable
audience in place so allow at least 6dB of spare gain control
If your signals are too hot, even with the gain control below the 9 o’clock position, use a less sensitive input, perhaps line instead of mic, or the console
pad switch
If your mic signals are too weak, even with the gain control above the 3 o’clock position, recheck your patch and make sure any input pad or insert
points are switched out. It’s also worth checking your mic specifications –in case the mic needs phantom power
3: Once you have a healthy PFL level, adjust the relevant subgroup or fader for AFL (after-fade listen) levels around +4dBu/0VU (analogue), or -18dBFS
(digital) with the channel routed and faded up to the nominal 0dB fader mark
Note that, for professional analogue consoles, this assumes that the nominal 0dB fader mark is 10dB below full fader level and that there is gain make-
up between the sub-group fader output and the AFL point. Non-professional consoles may not have this gain make-up so you may need to run at lower
AFL levels (around -6dBu) to maintain pre- subgroup fader headroom
4: Channel faders will eventually be set to the levels required for artistic balance. Large numbers of channels routed to the same subgroup or output will
raise overall mix bus levels and you may have to drop channel fader levels by 2-3dB every time you double the number of channels routed to the same
mix bus to maintain headroom
5: Adjust your master/output faders for the required sound level
6: Readjust channel gain controls for suitable pfl levels if specific input levels change, or after tweaking any channel strip effects or eqs
Note that short-term transients and peaks in live music - plus mix summing - can easily use up your headroom. Don’t be tempted to drive channel rms levels
much beyond +4dBu/0VU/-18dBFS if you want to minimise peak clipping and signal degradation further down the signal path.
Again, remember that you can always push the system harder using the master fader, once you’ve developed a clean mix.
122
Outboard effects set-up
Assuming you have set the relevant console channel with everything bypassed as above, switch in your inserts. If the outboard gear isn’t too noisy or mushy, use
the 18dB-below-clip rule.
If the outboard gear is too noisy or has poor quality converters, you may have to compromise on headroom by increasing the insert send level by a few dB and
decreasing the insert return level by the same amount.
If the outboard gear is starting to sound distorted at your likely maximum effect, you may need to bring its internal signal level down by reducing your console
insert send level and increasing the insert return sensitivity by the same amount.
123
Appendix C - “Maximum spl” specifications
Funktion One publishes a calculated “maximum spl figure” for guidance only. Potential purchasers should be aware, however, that neither calculated nor
measured maximum spl figures are a reliable figure of merit or comparison as there are no hard and fast rules when it comes to assessing maximum sound
pressure level.
Manufacturers tend to pick ’n’ mix the parameters that make their product look best. Some calculate maximum spl, but ignore factors that might detract from
that all-important magic number. Others measure responses but choose to ignore vital musical parameters such as power-bandwidth and distortion. Some only
quote peak spl using ridiculously short test durations that bear little relationship to musical performance criteria.
And don’t be fooled into thinking that manufacturers with impressive “educational” programmes publish more relevant figures. Sadly, the small print would
suggest otherwise.
In short, it’s a marketing jungle out there and the buyer should beware.
Introduction
Maximum spl figures are often thought of as a key parameter when assessing the suitability of a loudspeaker system. They are the starting point for sound
designers’ spl versus distance predictions when working out which loudspeaker system will provide the required performance for a particular installation or
event.
But are manufacturers’ maximum spl figures reliable – or, indeed, comparable?
Manufacturers’ small print suggests that a wide variety of calculation and measurement methods are in use. This makes it impossible to compare different
manufacturers’ data directly.
Most manufacturers quote calculated maximum spl figures based on their product’s sensitivity and their driver supplier’s power ratings. Calculations are easier
to do than actual measurements and most manufacturers are honest enough to admit this, stating a lack of suitably isolated locations or facilities. One
manufacturer, however, has been known to imply that mics aren’t available to measure beyond 140dB. They’ve obviously never heard of Brüel & Kjær.
Manufacturers who calculate maximum spl figures don’t usually indicate the applicable bandwidth or the likely distortion levels. See the Calculation notes
below.
Manufacturers who measure maximum spl figures quote a variety of test signals, endurance time and boundary conditions – or none at all. As each
measurement criterion can affect the resultant maximum spl figure by between 3 and 6dB, it is virtually impossible to compare different manufacturers’ spl
specifications once all possible criteria are taken into account. See the Measurement notes further down.
124
Calculation
You’d be forgiven for thinking that maximum spl ought to be fairly easy to calculate. After all, we know how to measure loudspeaker sensitivity. We simply apply
one watt of signal and see what spl we measure at one metre on axis. And loudspeakers’ maximum power ratings have been standardised since the Audio
Engineering Society (AES) published the original recommendations, AES2-1984, several decades ago. This was revised in 2003 and is still commonly used.
All we have to do is work out the AES power rating in dB, with reference to one watt, and then add that figure to the sensitivity figure, surely?
Working out the AES power rating in dB, with reference to one watt, and then adding that figure to the sensitivity figure is, indeed, a common way of calculating
maximum spl so most manufacturers have little choice but to follow suit. This industry tradition appears to allow potential purchasers to compare and contrast
different products from different manufacturers. But, unfortunately, the figures can cause unfair and misleading comparisons making the whole exercise
pointless.
125
handling claims.
Funktion One tries to avoid this kind of power war, by concentrating on turning the electrical signal into sound through highly efficient loudspeaker
system designs.
2. AES2-1984 (r2003) states “The rated power of the device shall be that power the device can withstand for two hours without permanent change in
acoustical, mechanical, or electrical characteristics, greater than 10%”. This means that a loudspeaker’s AES power rating only refers to its resistance to
permanent change (or failure), not to its linear operating range. It is quite permissible for a loudspeaker to generate excruciating levels of distortion or
to suffer from several dB of output compression as long as a permanent change doesn’t take place.
AES2-1984 (r2003) recommendations mention distortion measurements being made at 10% of the AES power rating. This is perfectly reasonable for
highly efficient loudspeakers, such as Funktion One systems, as most musical levels will be sitting well below the loudspeaker’s AES rating. But
inefficient, power hungry systems are likely to be running much closer to their AES ratings producing unacceptable levels of distortion and mush.
Current measurements of peak displacement limit maximum driver excursion (Xmax) to 10% deviation from linear displacement but manufacturers can
get around this by choosing their test bandwidths carefully. The recommendations allow manufacturers to choose between quoting input current
distortion or percentage deviation of displacement. The two types of distortion are not the same (and don’t necessarily increase linearly with excursion)
so manufacturers could simply choose whichever result looks better in the calculations. Unfortunately, distortion is rarely quoted so all this work could
be wasted anyway.
There is now a proposal to measure Xmax at 10% total harmonic pressure distortion or at 10% 2nd or 3rd order modulation distortion using a two-tone
signal where the upper frequency component is 8.5 x the frequency and at a 12dB lower level than the lower frequency component.
3. AES2-1984 (r2003) recommends that the test signal is band-limited pink noise and states that “The manufacturer shall state the upper and lower cut-off
frequencies (-3dB) of the noise signal”. Most loudspeaker system manufacturers simply say “band-limited pink noise” without quoting upper and lower
cut-off frequencies so it’s impossible to know if low frequency excursion is going to be a limiting factor in practice.
4. AES2-1984 (r2003) also recommends that the test noise has a 2:1 peak-to-rms voltage ratio – i.e. a 4:1 peak-to-average power ratio. This leads some
manufacturers to quote peak power ratings of four times the long-term AES rating. This is quite permissible as long as the peak power figure is only
used to supplement the normal AES power rating – and, of course, the peak power rating doesn’t cause over-excursion at very low frequencies. Again,
some indication of upper and lower frequency cut-offs would be helpful.
5. Some manufacturers also add a nominal 6dB spl to their calculated maximum spl figure to allow for “half space” or “2∏” (hemispherical) floor or wall
loading. This can make sense at low frequencies, where small loudspeakers exhibit omnidirectional pressure characteristics. It also makes sense for
subwoofers whose response extends low enough for the listener to be regarded as existing in half-space. It doesn’t make sense, however, for directional
horn sections whose coverage doesn’t wrap round to the boundary. Again, an indication of bandwidth would help here.
126
To summarise calculated maximum spl problems:
The quoted sensitivity – which is, after all, the basis of most calculated maximum spl figures - may be optimistic by up to 10dB at the upper and lower
ends of the frequency range.
Likely distortion figures are rarely mentioned.
Most manufacturers’ calculations ignore long-term voice coil heating and the resultant compression.
Manufacturers who state peak spl may have added 6dB to figures calculated using their driver suppliers AES power ratings.
Manufacturers who state “half space” or “2∏” conditions may have added a further 6dB to their figures.
Measurements
As mentioned earlier, manufacturers quote a variety of test signals, measurement parameters, endurance times and boundary conditions:
1. As far as test signals are concerned, some manufacturers quote “IEC 60268 noise” that has bandwidth and peak-to-rms characteristics similar to the AES
recommendations for power ratings (see earlier).
Some simply state “band-limited noise” without specifying upper and lower frequency limits – whilst others don’t specify their test signal at all.
The choice of test signal makes quite a difference. For instance, the rms level difference between sine sweeps and AES or IEC noise can be 3dB. And
regular (non AES or IEC) pink noise differences can be considerably greater.
The combined choice of measurement parameter and test signal can make quite a difference as well. A peak spl reading will look a lot more impressive
than an rms reading – especially with regular pink noise instead of AES or IEC noise. The pink noise’s peak measurement will be at a maximum but its
unmentioned rms value – and, therefore, its tendency to heat the voice coil and cause output compression – is likely to be considerably lower than the
AES or IEC recommendations.
2. Also, the careful choice of spot frequencies or noise bands can exaggerate the maximum spl figures to unrepresentative levels.
3. Most manufacturers agree that loudspeaker systems needs to be run for at least two hours for their magnetic assemblies and chassis to reach maximum
operating temperature. However, very few manufacturers state measurement duration. One manufacturer quotes maximum spl figures based on peak
readings of pink noise and further reading reveals that their product’s “peak power handling capacity” is quoted for 10ms. That’s only one cycle at
100Hz! Try explaining that to a bass or keyboard player who likes to play sustained notes!
4. Manufacturers who mention boundary conditions tend to state “half space” or “2∏” (hemispherical) conditions. Again, this can make sense for small
loudspeakers at low frequencies. And, of course, for subwoofers whose response extends low enough for the listener to be regarded as existing in half-
space.
127
5. Note that there are two types of “half-space” set-up used to minimise the effects of delayed ground reflections where an anechoic chamber isn’t
available:
i) The most common set-up is where the loudspeaker is mounted in half space – typically in a pit facing upwards so that its baffle (not its grille) is
flush with the ground. The measurement microphone is placed above the loudspeaker – usually on the acoustical crossover axis.
This half space loudspeaker set-up will show a level enhancement of up to 6dB at very low frequencies where the loudspeaker response is
almost omnidirectional. Results correlate nicely with the real-world listening experience.
ii) The second set-up is where the loudspeaker is placed on or near the ground and its acoustical crossover axis is tilted towards a “boundary”
microphone. The microphone is a small, but accurate, omnidirectional measurement microphone with its capsule facing the direction of the
loudspeaker – but placed snugly against the ground. This half space microphone set-up will show a level enhancement of up to 6dB over the full
frequency range of the loudspeaker being tested, as long as the surface is hard and smooth.
The method can be problematic, though, depending on the loudspeaker’s off-axis polar response and ground irregularities at high frequencies.
128
The boundary method also tends to enhance the mids and highs when compared with real-world listening conditions - where most listeners'
ears tend to be several wavelengths above the floor at mid and high frequencies. The pit method (i) is preferred.
6. There are still some manufacturers who state “open space” or “4∏” (spherical) conditions. It’s a difficult condition to meet in practice as you need a
measurement chamber that is anechoic down to the lowest frequency to be measured. Unless, of course, you hoist the loudspeaker and measurement
microphone high above the ground...
Powered loudspeakers
Maximum spl figures are often quoted for powered loudspeakers but very few manufacturers quote figures as per the drivers’ AES power ratings.
Before miniature power modules were available, amplifier recommendations were based on the driver’s AES power rating. This was tested using noise with a
6dB peak-to-rms voltage ratio. This implied that a good power amplifier would be capable of supplying the driver’s AES power continuously and that it would be
able to supply four times that power in bursts.
Amplifiers built into loudspeakers tend to be quite small for aesthetic and weight reasons and are often based on designs with large enough voltage swings for
instantaneous peaks, but inadequate power supply capacity for sustained performance. It is not unusual for powered loudspeaker manufacturers and power
module OEM suppliers to quote maximum power for just a few hundred milliseconds (often less) and to quote peak or burst power for only a few tens of
milliseconds. So that impressive maximum spl figure wouldn’t be relevant for sustained bass or keyboard notes.
Such systems tend to sound impressive on opening percussion runs with single or sparse instrumentation, but they rapidly degenerate into a mush once the full
band and vocals strike up.
129
Limiters
Limiters are usually employed to protect the drivers from accidental overload – especially in powered loudspeakers and professional touring systems. But they
can also be used to provide a more acceptable spectral balance when the system is being driven hard.
Go to www.funktion-one.com/settings/ for further information.
Most maximum spl figures are calculated from driver sensitivities and AES power ratings so limiters don’t really feature in the arithmetic. It would be helpful if
manufacturers stated the decrease in maximum spl expected with their recommended limiter settings dialled in. This, of course, should be with AES noise that is
band-limited to the pass-band of the relevant loudspeaker or section.
Note that these figures will depend on limiter attack and decay characteristics, and not simply on limiter thresholds.
Again, when measured figures are quoted, it would be helpful if manufacturers quoted the maximum continuous spl and maximum peak or burst spl using the
recommended or in-built power amplifier and using the recommended or pre-programmed limiter settings.
Conclusion
Neither calculated nor measured maximum spl figures are a reliable figure of merit or comparison as there are no hard and fast rules when it comes to assessing
a loudspeaker’s maximum sound pressure level.
Current methods are not transparent enough for potential purchasers to assess different products from a variety of manufacturers and make sensible
comparisons.
Many years ago loudspeaker driver manufacturers embraced AES2-1984 to provide consistency between driver manufacturers’ power ratings. The professional
audio industry has enjoyed an improvement in driver quality and reliability since then because the competitive focus shifted perceptibly from “smoke and
mirror” sales techniques to genuine technical improvement.
We now need a similar industry shift towards an agreed standard for testing and reporting complete loudspeaker system specifications. These specifications
should include distortion versus frequency – and versus operating levels. The current single-figure maximum spl specification owes more to the alarm industry
that to a serious professional sound industry.
130