FitSM Guide Specifying Services v1.0
FitSM Guide Specifying Services v1.0
Guide:
Specifying
Services
for
Portfolios
and
Catalogues
This
document
is
a
guide
for
specifying
services
for
Service
Portfolios
and
Service
Catalogues.
Version
0.8
(2014-‐02-‐21])
1. Context
This
is
a
guide
for
specifying
services
as
part
of
a
Service
Portfolio
or
service
catalogue.
Service
Portfolios
let
organisations
understand
what
services
they
provide
and
have
a
consistent
set
of
data
about
them
to
support
service
management.
Service
Catalogues
contain
similar
information
but
are
a
customer-‐facing
view
showing
them
what
services
they
can
receive
and
under
what
conditions.
This
guide
may
be
used
in
the
context
of
the
following
various
FitSM
components
(found
at
www.fitsm.eu).
This
guide
related
to
the
following
components:
The Services to be specified can be identified with the following FitSM component:
Applying
this
guide
may
support
compliance
against
the
requirements
listed
in
FitSM-‐1.
More
specifically,
this
guide
refers
to
the
following
requirements:
• FitSM-‐1:2013
PR1.1:
A
Service
Portfolio
shall
be
maintained.
All
services
shall
be
specified
as
part
of
the
service
portfolio.
• FitSM-‐1:2013
PR2.2:
A
service
catalogue
shall
be
maintained.
This file is part of the FitSM series of standards for lightweight service
management in federated IT infrastructures. It is intended to support the
implementation (IT) service management following the FitSM approach or
related frameworks. This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-
For
more
information
see
www.fitsm.eu.
NoDerivs International License
1
This
work
was
co-‐funded
by
the
European
Commission
under
the
EC-‐FP7
project
FedSM
(contract
number
312851).
FitSM-‐5
Guide:
Specifying
Services
2. Identifying
Services
The
purpose
of
a
Service
Portfolio
is
to
understand,
both
internally
and
externally,
what
services
an
organisation
provides.
This
is
necessary
for
effective
service
management
as
much
of
it
is
arranged
and
managed
by
service.
A
Service
Portfolio
also
helps
create
an
internal
awareness
within
the
organisation
of
the
concept
of
a
‘Service’
from
an
ITSM
point
of
view,
rather
than
a
more
technology-‐
orientated
point
of
view
(which
tends
to
refer
to
Service
Components
as
Services).
Services
can
be
identified
using
the
FitSM
component
Guide:
Identifying
Services.
The
Service
Catalogue
is
a
customer-‐view
of
the
same
set
of
information,
showing
potential
customers
what
services
are
available.
This
aligns
the
internal
and
external
view
on
what
customers
are
offered,
which
eases
customer
relationship
management.
3. Basic
Information
Specifying
services
should
begin
with
basic
information
about
the
service:
Name,
Service
Description
and
User
of
the
Service.
Service
names
should
be
descriptive
from
a
customer
point
of
view,
and
should
be
quite
simple,
such
that
someone
non-‐technical
has
a
chance
of
understanding
what
the
service
is.
Service
descriptions
should
be
similar,
and
consider
the
value
provided
by
the
service,
in
fairly
non-‐technical
terms.
These
descriptions
may
seem
obvious
but
help
everyone
within
the
organisation
understand
the
service,
and
also
will
be
needed
for
the
Service
Catalogue,
which
will
be
shown
to
users
and
customers.
User
of
the
Service
should
consider
the
direct
beneficiary
of
the
value
provided
by
the
service,
not
downstream
beneficiaries
or
those
perhaps
paying
for
it.
This
information
will
be
required
for
both
the
Service
Portfolio
and
Service
Catalogue,
though
the
information
may
be
phrased
differently
for
the
internal
(Portfolio)
and
external
(Catalogue)
audiences.
4.1.Service
Owner
For
each
service,
an
owner
should
be
assigned.
This
is
the
individual
who
has
accountability
for
the
whole
service,
from
a
management
point
of
view.
They
will
have
an
understanding
of
the
service
from
technology
through
to
user,
and
maintain
an
overview
of
the
effectiveness
and
success
of
the
service.
They
should
sufficiently
senior
to
fulfil
this
role,
so
have
management
experience
of
some
sort,
not
just
operational
experience.
This
information
is
only
available
in
the
Service
Portfolio,
as
customers
do
not
need
to
know
which
manager
is
responsible
for
each
service.
2
FitSM-‐5
Guide:
Specifying
Services
4.2. Contact
Information
(Internal)
This
is
the
agreed
contact
within
an
organization
for
communications,
questions
and
issues
relating
to
the
service.
At
first
it
may
be
the
personal
contact
information
of
the
Service
Owner,
and
this
may
be
sufficient
in
small
organizations,
but
it
is
preferable
to
move
toward
a
more
generic
email
contact
such
as
[email protected].
Having
a
generic
or
role
based
contact
makes
it
easier
to
cope
when
staff
are
absent,
or
when
a
role
such
as
Service
Owner
is
moved
from
one
individual
to
another.
This information is provided in Service Portfolios but not in Service Catalogues.
This
information
is
intended
to
be
in
the
Service
Catalogue,
and
while
it
can
also
be
held
in
the
Service
Portfolio,
it
should
be
clearly
marked
as
for
external
rather
than
internal
use.
The
Service
Status
is
only
displayed
in
the
Service
Portfolio,
as
the
Service
Catalogue
is
essentially
a
filtered
subset
of
only
those
services
that
are
categorised
as
‘present’
services
currently
offered
to
customers.
Service
Areas
or
Categories
are
not
obligatory
(for
instance
for
a
single
service
organisation)
and
may
be
in
both
the
Service
Portfolio
and
Service
Catalogue,
though
they
may
be
different
categorisations,
or
at
least
phrased
in
different
ways.
3
FitSM-‐5
Guide:
Specifying
Services
4.6. Service
Agreements
All
services
come
with
some
form
of
agreement
on
how
they
are
provided,
even
if
they
are
‘there
is
no
agreement,
you
use
it
as
it
is”.
More
traditionally
there
will
be
a
Service
Level
Agreement
(SLA)
attached
to
the
service.
It
is
very
important
that
this
is
listed
for
all
services,
though
it
may
change
over
time,
especially
as
service
management
is
initially
introduced
when
the
agreement
will
evolve
from
‘nothing’
to
quite
a
comprehensive
agreement
in
a
short
period
of
time.
However,
whatever
the
current
agreement
is,
it
should
be
made
explicit.
This
is
needed
internally,
as
many
other
aspects
of
service
management
are
aligned
to
the
agreement
–
for
instance
service
reporting
will
generate
reports
based
on
what
is
agreed
with
customers
in
service
agreements.
If
the
agreement
is
‘use
it
as
you
find
it’
then
no
reports
are
promised
and
service
reporting
is
very
simple.
If
you
have
a
complex
SLA
promising
weekly
custom
reports,
the
work
of
service
reporting
is
much
more
complicated.
Service
Agreements
should
be
included
in
both
the
Service
Portfolio
and
Service
Catalogue,
though
they
may
be
shown
in
different
ways.
5. Detailed
Makeup
This
section
looks
at
how
the
service
is
delivered
in
more
detail.
For
many
organisations
what
they
may
previously
have
considered
‘Services’
are
now
considered
‘Service
Components’
from
an
IT
Service
Management
point
of
view.
This
will
include
generic
components
that
may
be
attached
to
every
service,
such
as
network
or
helpdesk.
Others
may
be
more
service-‐specific
such
as
a
particular
web
service
needed
for
a
single
service.
This
list
tends
to
map
well
to
lists
of
activities
or
technical
services
that
many
organisations
hold
before
they
begin
with
formal
IT
Service
Management.
The
core
service
building
blocks
are
those
that
must
be
available
for
the
service
to
be
provided,
and
are
at
used
or
at
least
available
to
all
customers.
The core service building blocks are available in the Service Portfolio but not the Service Catalogue.
These
are
listed
separately
to
core
building
blocks
because,
for
instance,
failure
of
additional
blocks
is
of
a
lesser
urgency
than
failure
of
core
blocks,
as
additional
blocks
are
used
by
a
subset
of
customers.
Hence
they
are
considered
differently
in
a
service
management
context.
4
FitSM-‐5
Guide:
Specifying
Services
Additional
building
blocks
are
listed
in
the
Service
Portfolio
but
not
the
catalogue,
as
the
same
information
is
captured
in
a
different
way
in
the
Service
Catalogue,
as
Service
Packages.
These
Service
Packages
should
be
created
and
named
with
the
customer
point
of
view
in
mind,
so
be
clearly
labelled
and
offer
clear
value.
Should
a
provider
require
different
descriptions
internally
these
should
be
listed
as
additional
components
not
as
service
packages.
Service
Packages
will
be
primarily
created
for
the
Service
Catalogue,
but
will
also
be
listed
in
the
Service
Portfolio
such
that
the
provider
understands
which
additional
components
map
to
each
service
package.
5.4. Dependencies
In
some
cases
a
service
may
be
built
up
not
only
from
components,
but
also
from
whole
other
services
combined
with
additional
components.
In
this
case
there
is
a
dependency
between
one
service
and
another,
and
it
makes
more
sense
to
list
the
dependency
on
the
other
service
as
a
whole
rather
than
simply
the
components
within
it.
However,
if
there
is
a
service
listed
as
a
dependency
it
must
also
be
listed
in
its
own
entry
in
the
Service
Portfolio.
Dependencies are listed only in the Service Portfolio and not the Service Catalogue.
6. Business
Case
This
section
sets
out
factors
connected
to
the
service
in
a
business
sense,
considering
issues
of
finance,
risk
management
and
value
delivery.
These
may
seem
quite
different
to
the
more
technical
or
IT
Service
Management
aspects
considered
above,
but
are
important
to
consider
and
must
be
considered
per-‐service.
This
section
may
be
hard
to
fill
out
when
first
describing
a
service
in
terms
of
service
management,
but
should
be
nonetheless
attempted.
Cost
should
be
provided
in
a
unit
that
makes
sense
for
the
service,
such
as
€/terabyte
for
storage,
or
€/CPU
hour
for
processing.
For
subscription-‐based
services
it
may
be
cost
per
month
for
access.
At
first
this
cost
may
be
a
rough
estimate,
but
this
should
be
refined
over
time,
which
will
often
be
made
easier
by
implementing
other
aspects
of
service
management.
This information is provided only in the Service Portfolio and not the Service Catalogue.
5
FitSM-‐5
Guide:
Specifying
Services
6.2. Funding
source
Having
determined
the
cost
to
provide
the
service,
it
is
then
important
to
establish
where
these
funds
will
come
from.
This
can
be
based
on
payment
from
customers,
payment
from
donors
or
funding
bodies
or
perhaps
from
internal
resources.
This
is
important
as
to
ensure
sustainability;
costs
and
funding
sources
must
be
aligned
and
understood.
Options
include
pay
per
use,
subscription,
pay
per
unit,
indirect
via
a
funding
body,
or
based
on
income
from
other
organizational
sources.
This information is provided only in the Service Portfolio and not the Service Catalogue.
6.3. Pricing
This
is
the
price
charged
to
customers,
if
one
applies.
If
offered
through
a
model
such
as
pay
per
use
where
price
applies,
then
it
is
likely
to
be
the
cost
to
provide
plus
some
overhead
or
profit.
For
instance
“cost
plus
10%”
would
be
a
standard
pricing
approach.
If
there
is
no
price
(if,
for
instance,
the
service
is
indirectly
funded)
then
this
should
be
indicated.
This
information
is
in
both
the
Service
Portfolio
(where
it
may
include
a
breakdown
of
the
constituent
elements)
and
in
the
Service
Catalogue
(where
it
will
be
a
plain
price).
Value
to
Customer
should
be
included
in
both
the
Service
Portfolio
and
Service
Catalogue,
though
they
may
be
shown
in
different
ways
(one
internal,
one
external).
6.5. Risks
What
risks
are
presented
to
the
supplier
in
delivering
the
service?
While
many
risks
can
be
thought
of,
here
you
should
list
the
major
ones.
For
a
paid
service,
this
may
be
lack
of
customers
willing
to
pay.
For
an
indirectly
funded
service,
not
being
able
to
meet
the
promises
made
to
the
funding
body.
Here
it
is
important
to
consider
the
bigger
picture
with
regards
to
the
service
and
the
service
provider.
Understanding
the
risks
allows
them
to
be
balanced
against
benefits,
and
lets
the
service
provider
understand
which
services
it
is
beneficial
to
offer.
Risks are listed in the Service Portfolio, not in the Service Catalogue.
6.6. Competitors
While
it
is
important
to
define
yourself
based
on
your
value
proposition,
it
is
always
necessary
to
consider
competing
services.
Even
if
your
solution
is
better
and
cheaper,
perhaps
the
cost
for
customers
to
switch
from
the
market
leader
to
you
is
too
high
to
make
your
service
viable.
In
this
section
you
should
mention
the
major
competitors
to
your
service.
This
supports
decision
making
regarding
whether
the
service
is
strategically
appropriate
to
offer.
Competitors are listed in the Service Portfolio, not in the Service Catalogue.
6