Mat127b HW 0129
Mat127b HW 0129
HW 10 Solutions(6.2.3/6.2.5/6.2.13)
Exercise 1 (6.2.3)
For each n ∈ N and x ∈ [0, ∞), let
(
x 1, if x ≥ n1
gn (x) = and hn (x) = 1
1 + xn nx, if 0 ≤ x < n
Answer the following questions for the sequences (gn ) and (hn ):
a) Find the pointwise limit on [0, ∞).
b) Explain how we know that the convergence cannot be uniform on [0, ∞).
c) Choose a smaller set over which the convergence is uniform and supply an argument
to show that this is indeed the case.
Proof.
a) Pointwise limit of gn .
• If 0 ≤ x < 1,
x
lim xn = 0 =⇒ lim gn (x) = lim = x.
n→∞ n→∞ n→∞ 1 + xn
• If x = 1
1 1
lim 1n = 1 =⇒ lim gn (x) = lim n
= .
n→∞ n→∞ n→∞ 1 + 1 2
• If x > 1
x
lim xn = ∞ =⇒ lim gn (x) = lim = 0.
n→∞ n→∞ n→∞ 1 + xn
1
Hence let g(x) be the pointwise limit of gn (x)
x, if 0 ≤ x < 1
g(x) = 12 , if x = 1
0, if x > 1
• If x=0
• If x > 1,
Since n1 −→ 0 as n −→ ∞.
Hence for x > 1, there exists N ∈ N(depends on x) such that for all n ≥ N,
1
≤ x.
n
Hence
lim hn (x) = lim hn (x) = lim 1=1
n→∞ n→∞;n≥N n→∞;n≥N
2
b) We know by a Theorem that if fn (x) be a sequence of continuous functions defined on
A ⊂ R which converges uniformly to a function f (x), then f (x) is continuous in A.
We see that A = [0, ∞), and gn are continuous functions in A. If the sequence gn
converges uniformly to g, then the function g(x) should be continuous in [0∞).
Since that is not the case, hence the convergence is not uniform.
1
lim− hn (x) = lim+ nx = n = 1.
1
x→ n 1
x→ n n
If the sequence hn converges uniformly to h, then the function h(x) should be contin-
uous in [0, ∞).
Since that is not the case, hence the convergence is not uniform.
Let n ≥ N.
For any x ∈ [0, 12 ]
n+1
x x
|gn (x) − g(x)| = − x =
1 + xn .
1 + xn
Since x ≥ 0,
3
Hence
1 1
1 + xn ≥ 1 =⇒ ≤1 and xn+1 ≤
1 + xn 2n+1
n+1
x
≤ 1 .
=⇒
1 + xn 2n+1
− ln()
n≥N >
ln 2
1
=⇒ 2n+1 > 2n >
1
=⇒ < .
2n+1
Hence we have,
|gn (x) − g(x)| < .
Since n ≥ 1, hence for x ∈ [2, 3], hn (x) = 1 for every x ∈ [0, 1].
4
Exercise 2 (6.2.5)
Using the Cauchy Criterion for convergent sequences of real numbers, supply a proof for
Theorem 6.2,5 (First, define a candidate for f(x), and then argue that fn −→ f uniformly.)
Proof.
Theorem 6.2.5
=>
Let (fn ) be a sequence of functions which converge uniformly on A to f (say).
Given > 0,
there exists N 0 ∈ N such that
|fn (x) − f (x)| <
2
for n ≥ N and for all x ∈ A.
Choose N = N 0 ∈ N.
For n, m ≥ N, and for all x ∈ A we have
|fn (x) − fm (x)| ≤ |fn (x) − f (x)| + |f (x) − fm (x)| < + = .
2 2
<=
Let for every > 0, there exists N ∈ N such that |fn (x) − fm (x)| < whenever m, n ≥ N
and x ∈ A.
Given > 0,
there exists N ∈ N such that for every x ∈ A and for any m, n ≥ N, |fn (x) − fm (x)| < .
Let x ∈ A be any element.
Consider the sequence {fn (x)} ⊂ R.
5
Since we know that the sequence {fn (x)} is a Cauchy sequence for every x ∈ A in R, hence
we know that this sequence converges to a real number. We define,
for every x ∈ A.
Given > 0,
choose the N ∈ N such that |fn (x) − fm (x)| < 2
for every n, m ≥ N and for every x ∈ A. [From the assumption]
We will show,
|fn (x) − f (x)| <
for all n ≥ N and for every x ∈ A.
Let n ≥ N.
Choose m > max{N, Nx }.
Then
|fn (x) − f (x)| < |fn (x) − fm (x)| + |fm (x) − f (x)| < + = .
2 2
Given > 0, there exists an N ∈ N such that for any n ≥ N and for any x ∈ A, we have
Exercise 3 (6.2.13)
Recall that the Bolzano–Weierstrass Theorem (Theorem 2.5.5) states that every bounded
sequence of real numbers has a convergent subsequence. An analogous statement for bounded
sequences of functions is not true in general, but under stronger hypotheses several different
6
conclusions are possible. One avenue is to assume the common domain for all of the functions
in the sequence is countable. (Another is explored in the next two exercises.)
Let A = x1 , x2 , x3 , . . . be a countable set. For each n ∈ N , let fn be defined on A and assume
there exists an M > 0 such that |fn (x)| ≤ M for all n ∈ N and x ∈ A. Follow these steps
to show that there exists a subsequence of (fn ) that converges pointwise on A.
a) Why does the sequence of real numbers fn (x1 ) necessarily contain a convergent sub-
sequence (fnk )? To indicate that the subsequence of functions (fnk ) is generated by
considering the values of the functions at x1 , we will use the notation fnk = f1,k .
b) Now, explain why the sequence f1,k (x2 ) contains a convergent subsequence.
c) Carefully construct a nested family of subsequences (fm,k ), and show how this can be
used to produce a single subsequence of (fn ) that converges at every point of A.
Proof.
We have
{fn } ⊃ {f1,k } ⊃ {f2,k } such that {f2,k (x2 )}, {f1,k (x1 )} converges in R.
c) We will continue the process. After we obtain {fi,k } such that fi,k (xi ) converges, we
consider the sequence {fi,k (xi+1 )}.
Since |fi,k (xi+1 )| ≤ M is a bounded sequence in R, hence there exists a convergent
subsequence {fi+1,k (xi+1 )}.
Hence we obtain
7
{fn } ⊃ {f1,k } ⊃ {f2,k } ⊃ · · · ⊃ {fi,k } ⊃ {fi+1,k } ⊃ . . . such that {fj,k (xj )} converges.
OR
{gn } = {fi,j |i ≥ j}
Since we have the nested family of subsequence, hence {fj,k } ⊂ {fi,k } for every j ≥ i,
hence the sequence
{fi,1 (xi ), fi,2 (xi ), . . . fi,i (xi ), fi+1,1 (xi ) . . . fj,t (xi )} . . . } ⊂ {fi,k (xi ); i ≤ j; t ≤ j
converges.
8
Hence
lim gn (xi ) = lim fl,k (xi ) = lim fl,k (xi )
n→∞ l→∞;k≤l l→∞;k≤l;l≥i
{fi,1 (xi ), fi,2 (xi ), . . . fi,i (xi ), fi+1,1 (xi ) . . . fj,t (xi )} . . . } ⊂ {fi,k (xi ); i ≤ j; t ≤ j
which converges.
This implies
{gn (xi )} converges and since xi was an arbitrary element of A, hence the subsequence
{gn } ⊂ {fn } converges pointwise on A.