0% found this document useful (0 votes)
83 views9 pages

Mat127b HW 0129

This document contains solutions to homework problems from a calculus class. Problem 1 involves analyzing the pointwise and uniform convergence of two sequences of functions on the interval [0,∞). It is shown that one sequence converges pointwise but not uniformly, while the other converges uniformly on restricted intervals. Problem 2 proves a theorem about uniform convergence of functions using the Cauchy criterion for sequences. Problem 3 discusses how the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem does not directly apply to sequences of functions but convergence can be achieved by assuming the domain is countable.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
83 views9 pages

Mat127b HW 0129

This document contains solutions to homework problems from a calculus class. Problem 1 involves analyzing the pointwise and uniform convergence of two sequences of functions on the interval [0,∞). It is shown that one sequence converges pointwise but not uniformly, while the other converges uniformly on restricted intervals. Problem 2 proves a theorem about uniform convergence of functions using the Cauchy criterion for sequences. Problem 3 discusses how the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem does not directly apply to sequences of functions but convergence can be achieved by assuming the domain is countable.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

MAT 127B

HW 10 Solutions(6.2.3/6.2.5/6.2.13)

Exercise 1 (6.2.3)
For each n ∈ N and x ∈ [0, ∞), let
(
x 1, if x ≥ n1
gn (x) = and hn (x) = 1
1 + xn nx, if 0 ≤ x < n

Answer the following questions for the sequences (gn ) and (hn ):
a) Find the pointwise limit on [0, ∞).

b) Explain how we know that the convergence cannot be uniform on [0, ∞).

c) Choose a smaller set over which the convergence is uniform and supply an argument
to show that this is indeed the case.
Proof.

a) Pointwise limit of gn .

• If 0 ≤ x < 1,
x
lim xn = 0 =⇒ lim gn (x) = lim = x.
n→∞ n→∞ n→∞ 1 + xn

• If x = 1

1 1
lim 1n = 1 =⇒ lim gn (x) = lim n
= .
n→∞ n→∞ n→∞ 1 + 1 2
• If x > 1
x
lim xn = ∞ =⇒ lim gn (x) = lim = 0.
n→∞ n→∞ n→∞ 1 + xn

1
Hence let g(x) be the pointwise limit of gn (x)

x, if 0 ≤ x < 1

g(x) = 12 , if x = 1

0, if x > 1

Pointwise Convergence of hn (x)

• If x=0

lim hn (x) = lim 0 = 0.


n→∞ n→∞

• If x > 1,
Since n1 −→ 0 as n −→ ∞.
Hence for x > 1, there exists N ∈ N(depends on x) such that for all n ≥ N,
1
≤ x.
n
Hence
lim hn (x) = lim hn (x) = lim 1=1
n→∞ n→∞;n≥N n→∞;n≥N

Hence let h(x) be the pointwise limit of hn (x)


(
0, if x = 0
h(x) =
1, if x > 0

2
b) We know by a Theorem that if fn (x) be a sequence of continuous functions defined on
A ⊂ R which converges uniformly to a function f (x), then f (x) is continuous in A.

We see that A = [0, ∞), and gn are continuous functions in A. If the sequence gn
converges uniformly to g, then the function g(x) should be continuous in [0∞).

Since that is not the case, hence the convergence is not uniform.

Similarly for hn (x).


We see that A = [0, ∞), and hn are continuous functions in A.
This is because

lim+ hn (x) = lim+ 1 = 1


1 1
x→ n x→ n

1
lim− hn (x) = lim+ nx = n = 1.
1
x→ n 1
x→ n n

If the sequence hn converges uniformly to h, then the function h(x) should be contin-
uous in [0, ∞).

Since that is not the case, hence the convergence is not uniform.

c) Let us choose the interval,  


1
A = 0, .
2
Given  > 0, choose N ∈ N such that
 
− ln()
N > max ,1 .
ln 2

Let n ≥ N.
For any x ∈ [0, 12 ]
n+1
x x
|gn (x) − g(x)| = − x =
1 + xn .

1 + xn
Since x ≥ 0,

3
Hence

1 1
1 + xn ≥ 1 =⇒ ≤1 and xn+1 ≤
1 + xn 2n+1
n+1
x
≤ 1 .

=⇒
1 + xn 2n+1

Now, for the choice of n,

− ln()
n≥N >
ln 2
1
=⇒ 2n+1 > 2n >

1
=⇒ < .
2n+1
Hence we have,
|gn (x) − g(x)| < .

for any n ≥ N and for any x ∈ 0, 21 .


 

Hence in A = [0, 12 ], gn (x) converges uniformly to g(x).

For hn (x) choose


A = [2, 3].

Since n ≥ 1, hence for x ∈ [2, 3], hn (x) = 1 for every x ∈ [0, 1].

Given  > 0, choose N = 1 ∈ N, such that for any n ≥ N,

|hn (x) − h(x)| = 0 < 


for any x ∈ [2, 3]
Hence in A = [2, 3], hn (x) converges uniformly to h(x).

4
Exercise 2 (6.2.5)
Using the Cauchy Criterion for convergent sequences of real numbers, supply a proof for
Theorem 6.2,5 (First, define a candidate for f(x), and then argue that fn −→ f uniformly.)
Proof.

Theorem 6.2.5

A sequence of functions (fn ) defined on a set A ⊂ R converges uniformly on A if and only


if for every  > 0 there exists an N ∈ N such that |fn (x) − fm (x)| <  whenever m, n ≥ N
and x ∈ A.

=>
Let (fn ) be a sequence of functions which converge uniformly on A to f (say).

Given  > 0,
there exists N 0 ∈ N such that

|fn (x) − f (x)| <
2
for n ≥ N and for all x ∈ A.

Choose N = N 0 ∈ N.
For n, m ≥ N, and for all x ∈ A we have
 
|fn (x) − fm (x)| ≤ |fn (x) − f (x)| + |f (x) − fm (x)| < + = .
2 2

<=
Let for every  > 0, there exists N ∈ N such that |fn (x) − fm (x)| <  whenever m, n ≥ N
and x ∈ A.

Given  > 0,
there exists N ∈ N such that for every x ∈ A and for any m, n ≥ N, |fn (x) − fm (x)| < .
Let x ∈ A be any element.
Consider the sequence {fn (x)} ⊂ R.

5
Since we know that the sequence {fn (x)} is a Cauchy sequence for every x ∈ A in R, hence
we know that this sequence converges to a real number. We define,

f (x) = lim fn (x).


n→∞

for every x ∈ A.

We will show that fn converges uniformly to f .

Given  > 0,
choose the N ∈ N such that |fn (x) − fm (x)| < 2
for every n, m ≥ N and for every x ∈ A. [From the assumption]

We will show,
|fn (x) − f (x)| < 
for all n ≥ N and for every x ∈ A.

Let x ∈ A be any element.


Since the sequence fn (x) converges to f (x), hence given the  > 0, choose Nx ∈ N(may
depend on x) such that |fm (x) − f (x)| < 2 . for all m ≥ Nx .

Let n ≥ N.
Choose m > max{N, Nx }.
Then
 
|fn (x) − f (x)| < |fn (x) − fm (x)| + |fm (x) − f (x)| < + = .
2 2

Given  > 0, there exists an N ∈ N such that for any n ≥ N and for any x ∈ A, we have

|fn (x) − f (x)| < .

This proves that fn converges uniformly to f on A.

Exercise 3 (6.2.13)
Recall that the Bolzano–Weierstrass Theorem (Theorem 2.5.5) states that every bounded
sequence of real numbers has a convergent subsequence. An analogous statement for bounded
sequences of functions is not true in general, but under stronger hypotheses several different

6
conclusions are possible. One avenue is to assume the common domain for all of the functions
in the sequence is countable. (Another is explored in the next two exercises.)
Let A = x1 , x2 , x3 , . . . be a countable set. For each n ∈ N , let fn be defined on A and assume
there exists an M > 0 such that |fn (x)| ≤ M for all n ∈ N and x ∈ A. Follow these steps
to show that there exists a subsequence of (fn ) that converges pointwise on A.

a) Why does the sequence of real numbers fn (x1 ) necessarily contain a convergent sub-
sequence (fnk )? To indicate that the subsequence of functions (fnk ) is generated by
considering the values of the functions at x1 , we will use the notation fnk = f1,k .

b) Now, explain why the sequence f1,k (x2 ) contains a convergent subsequence.

c) Carefully construct a nested family of subsequences (fm,k ), and show how this can be
used to produce a single subsequence of (fn ) that converges at every point of A.

Proof.

a) Consider the sequence


{fn (x1 )}n∈N .

We know by Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem states that every bounded sequence of real


numbers has a convergent subsequence.
|fn (x1 )| ≤ M for every n ∈ N implies that there is a convergent subsequence in
{fn (x1 )}.
Let {fnk (x1 )}k∈N be the subsequence which converges. We call fnk = f1,k .

{f1,k }k∈N such that f1,k (x1 ) is a convergent sequence.

b) Consider the sequence in R,


{f1,k (x2 )}.

Since |f1,k (x2 )| ≤ M is a bounded sequence implies there is a convergent subsequence


in R, call it f2,k (x2 ).

We have

{fn } ⊃ {f1,k } ⊃ {f2,k } such that {f2,k (x2 )}, {f1,k (x1 )} converges in R.

c) We will continue the process. After we obtain {fi,k } such that fi,k (xi ) converges, we
consider the sequence {fi,k (xi+1 )}.
Since |fi,k (xi+1 )| ≤ M is a bounded sequence in R, hence there exists a convergent
subsequence {fi+1,k (xi+1 )}.
Hence we obtain

7
{fn } ⊃ {f1,k } ⊃ {f2,k } ⊃ · · · ⊃ {fi,k } ⊃ {fi+1,k } ⊃ . . . such that {fj,k (xj )} converges.

Consider the subsequence

{gn } = {f1,1 , f2,1 , f2,2 , f3,1 , f3,2 , f3,3 , f4,1 . . . }.

OR

{gn } = {fi,j |i ≥ j}

with dictionary order.


If,
fi,j = gk and fi0 .j 0 = gk0 then
k < k 0 if (i, j) < (i0 , j 0 ) in dictionary order.

Need to show that the sequence {gn } converges pointwise on A.


Let xi be any point on A.
Consider the sequence {fi,k(xi ) }.
We know that this sequence {fi (xi )} converges hence every subsequence of it.

{gn } = {f1,1 , f2,1 . . . fi−1,i−1 , fi,1 , fi,2 , . . . fi,i , fi+1,1 . . . }

Since we have the nested family of subsequence, hence {fj,k } ⊂ {fi,k } for every j ≥ i,
hence the sequence

{fi,1 , fi,2 , . . . fi,i , fi+1,1 . . . fj,t . . . } ⊂ {gn }; i ≤ j; t ≤ j

is a subsequence {fi,k }, and we know fi,k (xi ) converges


hence

{fi,1 (xi ), fi,2 (xi ), . . . fi,i (xi ), fi+1,1 (xi ) . . . fj,t (xi )} . . . } ⊂ {fi,k (xi ); i ≤ j; t ≤ j

converges.

8
Hence
lim gn (xi ) = lim fl,k (xi ) = lim fl,k (xi )
n→∞ l→∞;k≤l l→∞;k≤l;l≥i

which is exactly the limit of the sequence

{fi,1 (xi ), fi,2 (xi ), . . . fi,i (xi ), fi+1,1 (xi ) . . . fj,t (xi )} . . . } ⊂ {fi,k (xi ); i ≤ j; t ≤ j

which converges.
This implies
{gn (xi )} converges and since xi was an arbitrary element of A, hence the subsequence
{gn } ⊂ {fn } converges pointwise on A.

You might also like