Hedge Funds Discussion
Hedge Funds Discussion
Hedge Funds Discussion
Since the early days of the hedge fund industry the critical start-up mass of asset under
management has increased. During the 1970s and 1980s it may have been possible to start a
fund with less than US$10 million, while today the level is at least five to six times that
amount. In addition, the client base has shifted from primarily high-net worth individuals and
overseas funds of funds to include institutional investors and pension funds.
Over the past 20 years, the focus and character of funds also has changed along with the
markets, hedging against difficult and volatile markets and maintaining the asset base in
addition to maximising profits. In addition, assets under management and management fees
have increased. Regulatory scrutiny also has increased significantly over the period,
particularly in the wake of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act (Dodd-Frank).
The next phase of the evolution of the industry is for large funds to institutionalise,
passing ownership to successor management.
Government authorities are moving cautiously as they consider whether new policies or
regulations are needed to control the activities of hedge funds. Certainly, the record of the
past decade suggests instances of large position taking, either directly by hedge funds, or by
other investors with greater capital at their command who may take their cues from hedge
fund activity. Yet this recent history is far from clear that hedge funds, on balance, do more
harm in precipitating the fall of asset prices than they do good by helping break the free fall
that can afflict oversold markets, including markets for currencies. Thus, new restrictions on
hedge funds may do as much harm as good.