Bioethics Session 15 SAS
Bioethics Session 15 SAS
Bioethics Session 15 SAS
(Bioethics)
Anthony C. Badili
Name: _________________________________________________________________ Class number: _______
Learning Targets: Pen, paper, index card, book, and class List
At the end of the module, students will be able to:
1. Explain the difference between the “ordinary” and
“extraordinary” care; References:
2. Outline the arguments for personhood criteria and state how
they could be uses in withdrawing care determination; and, Ethics of Health Care: A Guide for Clinical
3. Understand the purpose of advance directives.. Practice Fourth Edition, Raymond S. Edge, J.
Randall Groves
A. LESSON PREVIEW/REVIEW
Brain Teaser: Find the 4 words that describe biological life and 4 words that describe biographical life.
E S E C N E I R E P X E E A E I C X Y
K H F C D O B E B E R P X E F S V N L
G H J K L W M R B C X S P T Q E H G D
F D S A E H E A R T B E A T I I L P P
Q D G H Y A D D F U I P R O L R T A E
F K N V T E U X D E X R G X F O B B R
M E M H A B C H U I P O I U A M Q D S
J E I S X O A D Z Q N W D R P E L I M
Y N M J J K T N X S A G E F L M D H S
G N B O J L I V I N T H K L Y A Q W X
E D U C R T O I O N Q Z X Y W O K G D
F L L I V I N G T H I N G S D G S L V
L E E W S F A V N M K Y Y G F I L O P
O I T E L I M I N A T I O N N M I L E
B. MAIN LESSON
That said, some people and groups believe that some refusals of treatment are acceptable and not others. They argue
that it is morally worse to refuse “ordinary treatment” rather than “extraordinary treatment.” This was based on the idea
that people have a general obligation to act to sustain their own lives. A certain degree of pain and suffering is normal. To
refuse to do the basic minimum to sustain one’s life is morally wrong because it undermines life itself, much like suicide.
Lately, insurance providers have used the ordinary/extraordinary distinction to determine which treatments they need to
cover, and which do not constitute “basic care.”
The key to both arguments is the focus on categorizing types of treatment. The error (on their own terms) comes when it
is not acknowledged that what is ordinary for one patient may be extraordinary for another. Legally no distinction between
treatment in categories is recognized about the right to refuse treatment. However, some see a moral difference and
refusal of ordinary treatment may be a sign that a surrogate is not acting in good faith.
Ordinary and extraordinary treatments are generally categorized as follows:
Ordinary Treatment
1. Low risk of harm.
2. Simple, relatively low tech.
3. Routine.
4. Good chance for benefit to the patient.
5. Relatively inexpensive.
6. Available to most people who need it.
7. Causes little pain or distress.
Extraordinary Treatment
1. High Risk
2. Complex, relatively high tech.
3. Innovative, experimental, unusual.
4. Relatively small chance for benefit to the patient.
5. Relatively expensive.
6. Available to few (may involve distributive justice issues).
7. Usually, a source of pain or distress.
Any treatment is extraordinary if the burdens outweigh the benefits, or it offers no hope of benefit for the patient. (Purtilo,
R. Ethical Dimensions in the Health Professions (Saunders, 1999) p220.) But who defines benefit and burden? And what
meets the criteria of hope?
Personhood
One who could be said to have interests
One who has cognitive awareness
One who is capable of relationships
One who has a sense of futurity
Advanced Directives
Living will is a type of advance directive. It is a written, legal document. It describes the treatments you would want if you
were terminally ill or permanently unconscious. These could be medical treatments or treatments that will help you live
longer. A living won’t let you select someone to make decisions for you.
A durable power of attorney (DPA) for health care is another kind of advance directive. A DPA states that you have
chosen to make health care decisions for you. It becomes active any time you are unconscious or unable to make medical
decisions (and may be called Medical Power of Attorney, or MPOA). A DPA is generally more useful than a living will. But
a DPA may not be a good choice if you don’t have another person you trust to make these decisions for you.
Supreme Court
Upheld concept that competent individuals could refuse life-sustaining treatment
Made no legal distinction between tube feeding and other life-sustaining measures
1. In December 1989, this case became the first right-to-die cases to be heard by the Supreme Court in the United States.
A. Baby doe case
B. Nancy Cruzan case
C. Karen Anne Quinlan case
D. None of the above
B
Answer: ________
In December 1989, Nancy Cruzan case became the first right-to-die cases to be heard by the Supreme Court
Rationale:________________________________________________________________________________________
in the United States
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Philosophers such as Joseph Fletcher and Joel Feinberg have attempted to define characteristics that a being must
possess in order to be considered the bearer of rights. Among the suggested criteria are as follows EXCEPT.
A. One who has cognitive awareness
B. One who could be said to have interests
C. One who has a sense of futurity
D. One who is incapable of relationships
D
Answer: ________
All of the following are suggested criteria except option D
Rationale:________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Procedure, medicine or treatment given to a patient offered no reasonable hope of benefit is an example of _____
care?
A. Extraordinary
B. Advanced
C. Ordinary
D. Exceptional
A
Answer: ________
Procedure, medicine or treatment given to a patient offered no reasonable hope of benefit is an example of
Rationale:________________________________________________________________________________________
extraordinary care
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
4. This is a federal law regarding advance directives that tell patients upon admission their rights under the state of law?
A. Living will statement
B. Patient Self-Determination Act (PSDA)
C. Durable power of attorney
D. None of the above
B
Answer: ________
Rationale:________________________________________________________________________________________
Patient Self-Determination Act (PSDA) is a federal law regarding advance directives that tell patients upon
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
admission their rights under the state of law
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
5. A 50-year-old woman is dying of cancer. She has only a few days to live. She has severe anemia due to the cancer.
Even though blood transfusion is the usual treatment for severe anemia, the decision is made not to give. What care does
this case involve?
A. Advanced care
B. Ordinary care
C. Extraordinary care
D. None of the above
C
Answer: ________
Rationale:________________________________________________________________________________________
This is statement/case involves extraordinary care
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
C. LESSON WRAP-UP