Module 2 1
Module 2 1
Module -2
Damage Assessment
1. Structural Components
2. Non-Structural Components
If there are any visual signs of structural and/or non-structural damage, then the building area
needs to be isolated, secured and marked as unsafe.
Typical failures would be found at the connections of the major structural elements, or
elementswill have inadequate vertical support (unsupported roof and decks that are cantilever
now).Indications would include cracking, spalling and complete loss of all or part of
structural element as shown in Fig.2.1.Settlement or shifting of damaged structure.
The rapid nonstructural assessment damage assessment would note the major failures within
the building structure including such items as structural debris, partitions, ceilings, glass,
piping, and electrical/mechanical equipment.Concrete fragments may be barely attached to
exposed reinforcement steel.
Rapid structural safety assessment should focus on those structural elements of greatest
importance to the remaining structure and the safety of rescue/recovery workers.
To perform rapid assessment the following equipment/ safety gear are required for
assessment team,
1. Documentation of damage
2. Visual observation
2.3.1 Observation
The texture of a concrete may suggest the possibility of chemical attack by a general
softening, leaching of the matrix or in the case of sulphate attack, whitening of the concrete.
Rust stain often indicates corrosion of reinforcement. If cracked concrete is broken out, the
state of crack surface gives useful information.
General flaking of an exposed concrete surface suggests frost damage. In fire damaged
structures, the color of concrete gives an indication of the maximum temperature reached.
When concrete surface is cracked, the crack pattern can be informative. A mesh pattern
suggests drying shrinkage. Exudations from cracks may be the result of water passing
through the concrete and washing out calcium salts. Relatively straight cracks indicates
excessive tensile strain.
Cracks formed due to unidirectional bending will be widest in the zone of maximum tensile
stress and will be taper long the length.Cracks caused by direct tension will be of roughly
uniform width.
2.3.1 Questioning
1. Mix proportions
2. Source of materials
3. Cube test results
4. Weather conditions
5. Design data/report
6. It is useful to collect all possible information from the people involved in the project.
1. Visual inspection
4. Diagnosis
Visual Inspection
Gives the information about history of construction, original quality, analysis and design
methods with assumptions made and the type of material used.Relevant details are not
available in many cases. Comparison of adjacent buildings also helps in proper diagnosis.
In majority of the cases, the loads acting on the structure will be different from the loads
assumed in the design.Cracking or any other damage may sometimes be attributed because of
these loads or load combinations were not considered in the analysis and
design.Environmental effects are likely to be different from those assumed or not considered
at the design stage. Effects of temperature changes, or a hostile atmosphere would impose
serviceability or durability problems.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis of the causes of the damage is of prime importance and is difficult too. A proper
and reliable diagnosis can be made only by conducting a systematic investigation using
proven test methods and experienced personnel.
Cracking
Cracking will occur whenever the tensile strain, to which concrete is subjected, exceeds the
tensile strain capacity of the concrete. The tensile strain capacity of concrete varies with age
and with the rate of application of strain.
Classification of cracks
It may be classified in terms of their effects:
1. Those cracks which indicate immediate structural distress
2. Those cracks which may lead in the long run to a reduction of safety, through
corrosion ofsteel
3. Cracks which lead to malfunction of the structure, as evidenced by leakage, sound
transfer,damage to finishes and unsatisfactory operation of windows and doors
4. Cracks which are aesthetically unacceptable
Class I-Cracks leading to Structural Failure
Little difficulty arises in relation to this class. Those cracks that indicate that failure is near
andthat margin of safety are seriously reduced, may have formed in concrete, which was
expected bythe designer, to carry load in its un cracked condition. Such cracks are necessarily
wide, and maylead to the detachment of parts of the structure.
leakage. Flow through a parallel-sided smooth crack, can be calculated in terms of head,
crack
width, crack length and fluid viscosity. The difficulty with concrete is that the cracks are not
smooth or parallel-sided.
Class IV-cracks affecting appearance
For class 4cracks, it has been suggested that crack widths up to 0.3mm in width are
acceptable
aesthetically, but there are no good guidelines. Various attempts have been made to establish
whatconstitutes an acceptable crack on an aesthetic basis, but in the end, there is no rational
basis foraesthetic decisions. The aesthetic objection to cracks may be summarized as:
1. Cracks cause alarm about the safety of the structure
2. Cracks lower the visual acceptance of the structure (a) by modifying surface textures
anddamaging the visual effect intended by the designer and (b) by giving an
appearance ofcheapness or bad building.
Other types of cracks due to:
1. Delayed curing
2. Formwork movement
3. Excess vibration
4. Sub grade settlement
5. Finishing
6. Early frost damage
7. Unsound materials
8. Long-term drying shrinkage
Load test is most commonly used. It is usually used for following reasons,
i. There are still doubts about the satisfactory performance of the structure under load
after survey and local testing
ii. It is difficult or impossible to determine adequate information about the structure and
its materials
iii. Verification of structural analysis in cases where the complexity of the structural form
does not lend itself or rigorous analysis.
iv. To determine the load carrying capacity of cracked beams and compare it with
original design strength before any remedial measures are suggested.
The selection of specific members or portion of a structure to be tested will depend upon the
relative importance of strength and expected load effect at various locations. Selection of
member may often be assisted by non-destructive methods coupled with visual inspection to
locate the weakest zone or elements.
The structure should be subjected to a load equal to full dead load of the structure plus 1.25
times the imposed load for a period of 24hrs. and then the imposed load shall be removed.
The deflection due to imposed load only shall be recorded. If within 24hrs. of removal of the
imposed load the structure does not recover at least 75% of the deflection under
superimposed load, the test may be repeated after a lapse of 72hrs. If the recovery is less than
80%, the structure shall be deemed to be unacceptable.
If the maximum deflection in mm, shown during 24hrs. under load is less than 40l2/D, where
1 is the effective span in m; and D, the overall depth of the section in mm, it is not necessary
for the recovery to be measured.
Non-destructive tests are used to obtain estimation of the properties of concrete in the
structure.Nondestructive tests provide alternatives to core tests for estimating the strength of
concrete in a structure, or can supplement the data obtained from a limited number of
cores.These methods are based on measuring a concrete property that bears some relationship
to strength. The accuracy of these methods, in part, is determined by the degree of correlation
between strength and the physical quality measured by the non-destructive tests.
Non-destructive tests are less time consuming and relatively inexpensive, can be used for the
following purposes,
The surface hardness method consists of impacting the concrete surface in a standard
manner.Activating a mass by a given energy and measuring the indentation or rebound
achieve this.The most commonly and widely used instrument is Rebound Hammer (IS
13311( Part 2 ) : 1992)
There are several hammers having varying impact energy from 0.07kg m to 3kg m.The high
impact energy hammers are used for mass concrete, road pavements and airport runways.The
low impact energy hammers(0.07 to 0.09 kg m) are used for small and low strength materials.
For testing, smooth, clean and dry surface is to be selected. If loosely adhering scale is
present, this should be rubbed off with a grinding wheel or stone. Rough surfaces resulting
from incomplete compaction, loss of grout, spalled or tooled surfaces do not give reliable
results and should be avoided.The point of impact should be at least 20 mm away from any
edge or shape discontinuity.
For taking a measurement, the rebound hammer should be held at right angles to the surface
of the concrete member. The test can-thus be conducted horizontally on vertical surfaces or
vertically upwards or downwards on horizontal surfaces. If the situation demands, the
rebound hammer can be held at intermediate angles also, but in each case, the rebound
number will be different for the same concrete.
Around each point of observation, six readings(10 readings are preffered) of rebound indices
are taken and average of these readings after deleting outliers as per IS 8900 : 1978 becomes
the rebound index for the point of observation.Each reading should not differ by more than 7
units.If more than 2 readings differ from the average by 7 units, than the entire set of readings
are taken afresh.The rebound values reflect the concrete quality up to a depth of 50mm in the
member.Strength prediction can be made to an accuracy of ±25%.
1. Type of cement
2. Type of aggregate
3. Surface condition/texture and moisture content of concrete
4. Curing and age of concrete
5. Stress state and temperature
6. Carbonation of Concrete Surface
The following table indicates the quality of concrete based on rebound number,
Longitudinal waves are faster and provide more useful information than other methods.
E
V = √k
⍴
k =[((1−))/(1+)(1−2) ]
⍴ = mass density
Test Procedure
Calibration chart is influenced by type of cement, cement content, admixtures, type & size of
aggregate, curing conditions and age of concrete.Test consists of transmitting longitudinal
vibrations produced by an electro acoustical transducer from one side of the concrete,
receiving the signal from other side, and measuring the transit time (T).The path length (L) of
the pulse is measured and velocity (V) is calculated as V=L/T
1. Direct transmission
2. Indirect transmission
3. Semi-direct transmission
The direct transmission is preferred since the maximum energy of the pulse is being directed
at the receiving transducer and gives the maximum sensitivity.
The indirect transmission is the least sensitive and for a given path length, produces a signal
which has only about 2% or 3% of that produced by direct transmission.Indirect transmission
is used when only one face of the concrete is accessible, when the depth of the surface crack
is to be determined or when the quality of the surface concrete relative to the overall quality
is of interest.
The semi direct transmission arrangement has a sensitivity intermediate between those of the
other two arrangements.In this method, there is uncertainty regarding path length. It is
generally found to be sufficiently accurate, if the length is measured from center of
transducer faces.
1. Surface condition
2. Moisture content
3. Temperature of concrete
4. Path length
5. Shape and size of specimen
6. Reinforcement
The following table indicates the quality of concrete based on UPV values,
Rebar locator
A rugged field instrument for finding the location depth and size of reinforcement bars in
place. It has following features:
1. Single unit construction no physical strain for the operator and no probe cord to snag
or break
2. Post-mounted sensor with meter mounted separately for convenient viewing by
operator in stand-up position
3. Pin point accuracy for precise Rebar location from direct reading, stable analogue
meter
4. Detection up to 250mm of cover with easy-to-read calibrated meter
5. Light operating weight- less than 1.6kg
6. Up to 8hrs. continuous use between battery charge.
Directions and orientations of rebars: The exact position and orientation of rebars can be
measured quickly and accurately. Rebar-free areas can be identified for taking core samples,
grinding, resurfacing or insertion of new machinery mountings.
Measurement of concrete cover: The amount of concrete cover over the reinforcement bars is
an important parameter on bridge decks, highways, columns and slabs. Concrete covers can
be determined with an accuracy of ±3mm.
The instrument can locate any ferrous base material such as pipe, flues, wire and sheets
embedded in concrete up to a depth of 250mm.