Pt/Ga-SBA-15 Composites Synthesis and Characterization
Pt/Ga-SBA-15 Composites Synthesis and Characterization
J. Escobar Aguilar#
Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo
G. A. Madero, Cd. de México, 07730, México
M.C. Barrera
Facultad de Ciencias Químicas-Centro de Investigación en Recursos Energéticos y Sustentables, Universidad Veracruzana
Coatzacoalcos, Veracruz, 96538, México
(Received: September 23rd, 2019; Accepted: March 16th, 2020)
Pt (0.5, 1 and 1.5 wt%) was impregnated by incipient wetness on SBA-15 and corresponding Ga-modified (3, 5, 10 and 20
wt%) composites. Gallium nitrate was incorporated directly during the mesoporous siliceous network synthesis. Materials
were characterized by N2 physisorption, X-ray diffraction, Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron
microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. SBA-15 had surface area greater than 800 m²/g that decreased by Ga
incorporation in binary materials. It seemed that tetrahedral gallium was well-incorporated into mesoporous silica walls. Pt
dispersion slightly diminished (as to that on SBA-15) by augmenting Ga concentration in composites. Corresponding pore
size maxima shifted to lower diameters (as to that of non-impregnated supports) after platinum loading suggesting Pt
crystals inside pores of SBA-15 and Ga-modified carriers. Large cubic platinum crystals were observed over all prepared
materials probably due to sintering (during calcining at 500 °C) of metallic particles weakly interacting with the carriers
surface. After materials annealing (500 °C under static air) metallic platinum was evidenced (by XRD) pointing out to
noble metal reduction that could be facilitated by decomposition of organic remains from Si alkoxide used during supports
synthesis which presence was ascertained by FTIR.
1
Superficies y Vacío 33 (2020) 1-8. © Sociedad Mexicana de Ciencia y Tecnología de Superficies y Materiales
2
Superficies y Vacío 33 (2020) 1-8. © Sociedad Mexicana de Ciencia y Tecnología de Superficies y Materiales
Figure 1. N2 adsorption isotherms (at -198 °C) and pore size distribution (BJH profiles), corresponding to (a) and (b) pristine SBA-15 and Ga-modified
supports at various gallium contents; (c) and (d) Pt(1.0 and 1.5 wt%)/SBA-15; (e) and (f) SBA-15 modified with 20 wt% Ga and corresponding Pt impregnated
(1.0 and 1.5 wt%) solids.
Ga(3)-SBA-15 was intermediate between H1 and H2-type Conversely, samples with Ga at 10 and 20 wt% had SBET
probably by influence of some Ga2O3 segregated domains. completely similar to corresponding bSBET ones strongly
Textural characteristics of various prepared solids (mixed suggesting abscence of clogged pores due to well-dispersed
supports and corresponding Pt-impregnated materials) are Ga phases integrated to mesoporous siliceous matrix.
shown in Tables 1 and 2. Pristine mesoporous SBA-15 had Unaffected shape of adsorption isotherms in those cases
typical texture with 819 m2/g surface area (SBET), pore supported that assumption (Figure 1a). In this line, gallium
volume (Vp) of 1.05 cm3/g and average pore diameter (from inclusion (in tetrahedral coordination) into siliceous SBA-15
corresponding PSD, Figure 1b) of 5.55 nm. Those properties well-ordered mesoporous structure has been identified (by
71
nicely corresponded to expected values for SBA-15 matrices Ga NMR spectroscopy) by others [19] when studying
(500 < SBET < 1300 m2/g, 0.82 < Vp < 1.69 cm3/g) commonly modified SAB-15 materials at various Ga contents and
reported in the literature for such type of mesostructured prepared through different synthesis methodologies. Launay
SiO2 [18]. et al. [19], also reported better incorporation of gallium at
However, all Ga-modified solids at various contents had higher content in SBA-matrices where in samples at Si/Ga of
decreased surface area as to that of pristine SBA-15. Fifth
Table 2. Textural properties of Pt supported on SBA-15 and various
column of Table 1 shows theoretical surface area of Ga-SBA-15 materials prepared.
composites considering incorporation of essentially non-
porous Ga2O3 component in SBA-15 matrix (bSBET), pointing Sample
SBET Vp a
Dp bSBET
S /bS
out to that in samples of the lowest Ga content gallium oxide (m2/g) (cm3/g) (nm) (m2/g) BET BET
domains could be partially plugging well-ordered 3.89,
mesoporous siliceous network. Pt(0.5)/SBA-15 684 0.86 815 0.84
5.60
Table 1. Textural properties of SBA-15 and various Ga-SBA-15 materials 3.89,
Pt(1)/SBA-15 609 0.68 811 0.75
prepared. 4.80
SBET Vp a
Dp b
SBET 3.89,
Sample SBET/bSBET Pt(1.5)/SBA-15 642 0.84 807 0.80
(m2/g) (cm3/g) (nm) (m2/g) 5.40
SBA-15 819 1.05 5.55 - - 3.89,
Pt(1.5)/Ga(3)-SBA-15 633 0.53 581 1.00
Ga(3)-SBA-15 590 0.57 3.89, 5.5 786 0.75 4.00
Ga(5)-SBA-15 676 0.92 5.80 764 0.88 Pt(1)/Ga(20)-SBA-15 562 0.62 4.7 580 0.97
Ga(10)-SBA-15 681 0.89 5.79 709 0.96
Ga(20)-SBA-15 586 0.79 5.42 599 0.98 3.9,
Pt(1.5)/Ga(20)-SBA-15 518 0.54 577 0.90
a
From BJH plot, desorption branch data. 5.2
b a
Theoretical value considering well-dispersed non-porous Ga2O3 phase From BJH plot, desorption branch data.
b
component. Theoretical value considering well-dispersed non-porous Pt deposition.
3
Superficies y Vacío 33 (2020) 1-8. © Sociedad Mexicana de Ciencia y Tecnología de Superficies y Materiales
X-ray diffraction
A wide signal identified in the 15-35° 2θ range observed in
diffractograms of all studied samples corresponded to
amorphous silica constituting SBA-15 walls [22], Figure 2a.
No reflexions related to Ga2O3 defined domains were
identified on any binary support (Figure 2a) pointing out to
abscence of defined gallium oxide crystals. Although
existence of well-dispersed oxidic gallium domains
(undetectable by XRD) could not be ruled out that fact
suggested good integration of Ga3+ species into the walls of
Figure 2. Wide-angle X-ray diffraction patterns of SBA-15, Ga-modified mesoporous tetrahedral silicon oxide network [23].
SBA-15 at various gallium contents and corresponding Pt-impregnated Conversely, reflections due to Ga2O3 crystals has been
solids. (a) SBA-15 and Ga-modified binary supports; (b) Pt-impregnated on reported [23] in the case of samples where gallium was
pristine SBA-15; (c) Pt-impregnated on Ga(20)-SBA-15.
deposited at 10 wt% (through corresponding nitrate as salt
5 and 10 (very similar composition to our materials with 5 precursor) by post-synthesis impregnation on SBA-15
and 10 Ga wt%) the latter solid had higher Ga proportion matrix.
incorporated in the mesoporous tetrahedral matrix. Probably Pt impregnated solids showed three main reflections at 2θ
at enhanced Ga3+ concentration there could be better values of 39.8, 46.1 and 67.8° assigned to interplanar
adjustment of the hydrolysis rates of the Si and Ga starting distances of (111), (200) and (220) face-centered cubic
materials [19]. metallic platinum facets (PDF 01-087-0640), Figures 2b and
With the sole exception of binary solid at the lowest 2c. Unexpectedly, no supported PtOx species were found. In
gallium content PSD profiles of Ga-modified solids (Figure the opposite, metallic Pt0 was evidenced.
1b) showed maxima at around 5.8 nm (Table 1) similar to Finding reduced platinum in calcined samples (see sub-
that of parent SBA-15 pointing out to efficient integration of section Pt impregnation) supported on SBA-15 has been
Ga3+ into walls of siliceous mesoporous network. reported (as determined by XPS analysis) in the past by
others [24], although no explanation was advanced in that
4
Superficies y Vacío 33 (2020) 1-8. © Sociedad Mexicana de Ciencia y Tecnología de Superficies y Materiales
Crystallite size
Sample
(nm)
Pt(0.5)/SBA-15 7.78
Pt(1)/SBA-15 8.58
Pt(1.5)/SBA-15 18.85
Pt(1)/Ga(3)-SBA-15 16.39
Pt(1.5)/Ga(3)-SBA-15 23.33
Pt(1)/Ga(5)-SBA-15 20.64
Pt(1.5)/Ga(5)-SBA-15 24.04
Pt(1)/Ga(10)-SBA-15 18.77
Pt(1.5)/Ga(10)-SBA-15 26.69
Pt(1)/Ga(20)-SBA-15 21.77
Pt(1.5)/Ga(20)-SBA-15 23.93
case. Organic remains that could be present in our mixed Figure 3. FTIR spectra of pristine SBA-15 and Ga-modified supports at
materials could play a determining role on that fact. Indeed, various gallium contents.
organic residua from Si alkoxides used during SBA-15 and
corresponding Ga-modified solids synthesis usually could role on noble metal dispersion. Further work is needed on
remain occluded in calcined materials [25]. Those organic this point to elucidate the reason behind observed behavior.
species could contribute to Pt reduction during high- Finally, it seemed that due to the presence of organic remains
temperature annealing. Indeed, organic compounds had been (that could contribute to impregnated platinum reduction
sucessfully applied by others as noble metals reductants [26]. during annealing conditions under air) the reduction step
According to Scherrer formula and by using the most under H2 flow (at 300-400 °C) [27,28] could be avoided
intense Pt (111) reflection corresponding crystal size for simplifying then the catalyst activation procedure.
solids with SBA-15 and Ga-modified ones as carrier were
estimated, Table 3. Platinum crystal size on pristine siliceous FTIR spectroscopy
support increased from 7.78 to 18.85 nm with Pt loading Broad bands centered around 3453 and 1633 cm-1 were
from 0.5 to 1.5 wt%. Others have reported [20] similar values attributed to stretching vibrations of surface hydroxyl groups
to the last one when studying samples with 4 wt% platinum and water [29] and to deformation vibration of adsorbed un-
attributing that to low interaction of deposited species with dissociated H2O molecules coordinated to surface centers
silanol groups on silica surface. Due to that, in addition to [30], Figure 3. Shoulder at 3685 cm-1 in all spectra could be
low Pt dispersion after impregnation significant metallic related to surface silanol groups [31]. Absorptions at 2970
particles sintering during high-temperature annealing could and 2857 cm-1 related to -CH3 degenerated stretching mode
take place. Also, low noble metal dispersion could justifiy and -CH2 stretching symmetrical vibrations, respectively,
significant SBET loss of SBA-15-supported samples, much indicated organic remans from Si alkoxides used during
larger to those expected considering noble metal loading (see support synthesis [25]. As mentioned in previous section,
column 6 of Table 2). In these cases, Pt crystals dimensions those organic remains could contribute in reducing deposited
were clearly big enough to plug some pores (Dp ~ 5.8 nm, platinum species supported on the prepared composites.
Table 1) of the pristine siliceous carrier. Peak at around 10814 cm-1 corresponded to Si-O-Si
Ga addition in SBA-15 matrix was detrimental on Pt asymmetric stretching vibration meanwhile bands at ~803
dispersion as to that on SBA-15 carrier, Table 3. For and 458 cm-1 were originated by symmetric stretching and
materials at 1 wt% Pt loading crystal size increased from deformation modes of aforementioned bonds.
8.58 (on pristine siliceous support) to 21.77 nm in the solid Band at 967 cm-1 was related to Si-OH stretching vibrations
of the highest Ga content. Although that could be ascribed to [29]. No infrared absorptions corresponding to Ga 2O3
much lower SBET of binary supports as to that of pristine defined domains could be stablished (Figure 3), in agreement
SBA-15 (for instance, 586 versus 819 m2/g for material with with that found by XRD (Figure 2a). Band at 458 cm-1 in
20 wt% Ga and pristine mesoporous solid, respectively, studied spectra could be related to Si-O-Si bending
Table 1) it was clear that gallium modification did not vibrations [32].
favorably altered surface properties of mixed oxides
obtained. In the opposite to that found, incorporation of Scannig electron microscopy
gallium in tetrahedral network in SBA-15 matrix resulted in SBA-15 morphology exhibited particles of around 3-4 μm
improved vanadium species dispersion, being that attributed in diameter formed by numerous agglomerated hexagonal
to better anchorage of those species on a more acidic support platelets of 800-1000 nm (not shown), completely similar to
(as compared to pristine silica-based one) [23]. It is worth that previously reported [33]. Smooth platelets of very short
noting that Ga incorporation method used in mentioned length in axial direction were evidenced. In full agreement,
investigation (gallium impregnation at various loadings on a others [34] identified alike morphology for SBA-15 prepared
pre-formed siliceous matrix) probably could play a decisive under similar conditions as to those used in the present
5
Superficies y Vacío 33 (2020) 1-8. © Sociedad Mexicana de Ciencia y Tecnología de Superficies y Materiales
6
Superficies y Vacío 33 (2020) 1-8. © Sociedad Mexicana de Ciencia y Tecnología de Superficies y Materiales
Conclusions
Figure 6. HR-TEM micrographs of platinum-impregnated materials.
(a) Pt(1.5)/SBA-15; (b) Pt(1.5)/Ga(20)-SBA-15. Arrows: Platinum crystals. Pt (0.5, 1 and 1.5 wt%) was impregnated by incipient
wetness on SBA-15 and corresponding Ga-modified (3, 5,
High-resolution TEM 10 and 20 wt%) composites. Gallium nitrate was used to
The highly ordered honeycomb-shaped mesoporous incorporate Ga directly during the mesoporous siliceous
structure of siliceous pristine SBA-15 containing hexagonal network synthesis. SBA-15 had surface area greater than 800
cross sections with pores of around 6 nm (Table 1) was m²/g that decreased by Ga incorporation in binary materials.
evidenced in Figure 5a. That characteristic 2-D hexagonal It seemed that in most samples (but in the one of the lowest
symmetry (p6mm) was in full agreement with corresponding gallium content) a good proportion of tetrahedral Ga was
structural characterization of SBA-15 materials as presented well-incorporated into mesoporous silica walls. Pt dispersion
in previous works [32, 39]. Although our materials were not diminished (as to that on SBA-15) by augmenting Ga
characterized by low-angle XRD we considered that shape concentration in composites. Corresponding pore size
of corresponding N2 adsorption isotherms (Figure 1a) and maxima shifted to lower diameters (as to that of non-
studies by high resolution HR-TEM (Figure 5) clearly impregnated supports) after platinum loading suggesting Pt
evidenced the mesoporous ordered structure corresponding crystals inside pores of SBA-15 and Ga-modified carriers,
to SBA-15-type materials. That array was well- preserved in that effect being more evident in the latter. Large cubic
the composite of the highest Ga content (Figure 5b) in full platinum crystals (25-50 nm) were observed over all
agreement with the unaltered shape of corresponding N2 prepared materials probably due to sintering (during
physisorption isotherm, Figure 1a, as to that of pristine SiO2 calcining at 500 °C) of metallic particles weakly interacting
matrix pointing out to good incoporation of tetrahedral Ga3+ with the carriers surface. After materials annealing (500 °C
in silica framework. No defined segregated Ga2O3 domains under static air) metallic platinum was evidenced (by XRD)
7
Superficies y Vacío 33 (2020) 1-8. © Sociedad Mexicana de Ciencia y Tecnología de Superficies y Materiales
pointing out to noble metal reduction during decomposition Today 41, 207 (1998).
of organic remains from Si alkoxide used during carriers [18]. A.J. Schwanke, C. Favero, R. Balzer, K. Bernardo-Gusmão,
synthesis which presence was ascertained by FTIR. No S.B.C. Pergher, J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 29, 328 (2018).
positive effect of Ga addition in SBA-15 matrices on [19]. F. Launay, B. Jarry, J.L. Bonardet, Appl. Catal. A-Gen 368,
132 (2009).
platinum dispersion was observed. [20]. Y. Yin, Z.F. Yang, Z.H. Wen, A.H. Yuan, X.Q. Liu, Z.Z.
Zhang, H. Zhou, Sci. Rep. 7, 4509 (2017).
Acknowledgements [21]. M.S. Kumar, D. Chen, J.C. Walmsley, A. Holmen, Catal.
R. Hernández Morales acknowledges UJAT-DACB and Commun. 9, 747 (2008).
IMP for their support on carrying out the present [22]. R. Palcheva, L. Kaluža, L. Dimitrov, G. Tyuliev, G. Avdeev,
investigation. He is also is grateful to CONACYT (Mexico) K. Jirátová, A. Spojakina, Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 520, 24 (2016).
by Master in Science scholarship provided (639499). [23]. L.P. Rivoira, J. Cussa, M.L. Martínez, A.R. Beltramone,
Catal. Today, in press, available (2018).
References [24]. D. Ballesteros-Plata, A. Infantes-Molina, E. Rodríguez-
[1]. K. Flodström, V. Alfredsson, Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 59, 167 Castellón, Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 580, 93 (2019).
[25]. J. Escobar, J.A. De los Reyes, T. Viveros, Ind. Eng. Chem.
(2003).
Res. 39, 666 (2000).
[2]. E.M. Björk, J. Chem. Educ. 94, 91 (2017).
[26]. Y. Shiraishi, H. Tanaka, H. Sakamoto, S. Ichikawa, T. Hirai,
[3]. S. Singh, R. Kumar, R., H.D. Setiabudi, S. Nanda, Appl. Catal.
RSC Adv. 7, 6187 (2017).
A-Gen. 559, 57 (2018).
[27]. M.Y. Kim, S.B. Jung, M.G. Kim, Y.S. You, J.-H. Park, C.-H.
[4]. V. Meynen, P. Cool, E.F. Vansant, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater.
Shin, G. Seo, Catal. Lett. 129, 194 (2009).
125, 170 (2009).
[28]. B. Li, Z. Xu, W. Chu, S. Luo, F. Jing, Chinese J. Catal. 38,
[5]. A. Arumugam, V. Ponnusami, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Techn. 67, 244
726 (2017).
(2013).
[29]. Z. Wang, F. Zhang, Y. Yang, B. Xue, J. Cui, N. Guan, Chem.
[6]. J.J. Kim, G.D. Stucky, Chem. Commun. 13, 1159 (2000).
Mater. 19, 3286 (2007).
[7]. P.F. Wang, H.X. Jin, M. Chen, D.F. Jin, B. Hong, H.L. Ge, J.
[30]. C. Morterra, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1 84, 1617 (1988).
Gong, X.L. Peng, H. Yang, Z.Y. Liu, X.Q. Wang, J. Nanomater.
[31]. G.W.Griffith, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 23, 590 (1984).
2012, 269861 (2012).
[32]. F. Azimov, I. Markova, V. Stefanova, Kh. Sharipov, J. Univ.
[8]. R. Huirache-Acuña, R. Nava, C.L. Peza-Ledesma, J. Lara-
Chem. Technol. Metallurgy 47, 333 (2012).
Romero, G. Alonso-Núñez, B. Pawelec, E.M. Rivera-Muñoz,
[33]. G. Morales Hernández, J.G. Pacheco Sosa, J. Escobar Aguilar,
Materials 6, 4139 (2013).
J.G. Torres Torres, H. Pérez Vidal, M.A. Lunagómez Rocha, D. De
[9]. Z. El Berrichi, L. Cherif, O. Orsen, J. Fraissard, J.P. Tessonnier,
la Cruz Romero, P. del Ángel Vicente, Rev. Mex. Ing. Chem. 19,
E. Vanhaecke, B. Louis, M.J. Ledoux, C. Pham-Huu, Appl. Catal.
997 (2019).
A-Gen. 298, 194 (2006).
[34]. Y. Qin, Y. Wang, H. Wang, J. Gao, Z. Qu, Procedia Environ.
[10]. M.J. Gracia, E. Losada, R. Luque, J.M. Campelo, D. Luna,
Sci. 18, 366 (2013).
J.M. Marinas, A.A. Romero, Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 349, 148 (2008).
[35]. M. Janicke, D. Kumar, G.D. Stucky, B.F. Chmelka, Stud. Surf.
[11]. Z. El Berrichi, B. Louis, J.P. Tessonnier, O. Ersen, L. Cherif,
Sci. Cat. 84, 243 (1994).
M.J. Ledoux, C. Pham-Huu, Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 316, 219 (2007).
[36]. A. Hernández, J. Escobar, J.G. Pacheco, J.A. de los Reyes,
[12]. L. Rivoira, M.L. Martínez, O. Anunziata, A. Beltramone,
M.C. Barrera, Rev. Soc. Quím. Méx. 48, 260 (2004).
Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 254, 96 (2017).
[37]. C.A. Deshmane, J.B. Jasinski, M.A. Carreon, Eur. J. Inorg.
[13]. C.-F. Cheng, C.-H. Cheng, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 156, 133
Chem. 2009, 3275 (2009).
(2005).
[38]. C.A. Deshmane, J.B. Jasinski, M.A. Carreon, Micropor.
[14]. A.S. Al-Fatesh, A.A. Ibrahim, J.K. Abu-Dahrieh, A.S. Al-
Mesopor. Mat. 130, 97 (2010).
Awadi, A.M. El-Toni, A.H. Fakeeha, A.E. Abasaeed, Catalysts 8,
[39]. J. Zhu, T. Wang, X. Xu, Appl. Catal. B- Environ. 130-131,
229 (2018).
[15]. S. Kaneko, M. Izuka, A. Takahashi, M. Ohshima, H. 197 (2013).
[40]. J. Liu, Q. Ji, T. Imai, K. Ariga, H. Abeb, Sci. Rep. 7, 41773
Kurokawa, H. Miura, Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 427-428, 85 (2012).
(2017).
[16]. K.S.W. Sing, D.H. Everett, R.A.W. Haul, L. Moscou, R.A.
Pierotti, J. Rouquérol, T. Siemieniewska, Pure Appl. Chem. 57, 603 [41]. A. Olivas, P.A. Luque, C.M.Gómez-Gutiérrez, D.L. Flores, R.
(1985). Valdez, L. Escalante, P. Schach, R.Silva-Rodrigo, Catal. Commun.
[17]. S.G. Leofanti, M. Padovan, G. Tozzola, B. Venturelli, Catal. 91, 67 (2017).
© 2020 by the authors; licensee SMCTSM, Mexico. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).