Project 2 Engineering Management
Project 2 Engineering Management
Project 2 Engineering Management
Engineering
ORGANIZATION
PLANNING,
DESIGN, AND
DEVELOPMENT
By: Campo, Elizabeth C BSCE III
ORGANIZATION PLANNING
TECHNIQUES
1. Organization Analysis:
Process of defining the objectives and activities of a firm in the light Of
an examination Of its external environment and internal circumstances.
2. Organization Design:
The information provided by the organization analysis is used to define
the structure of the organization, the function of each major activity and
the role and responsibilities of each management position in the
structure.
ORGANIZATION PLANNING
METHODS
1. Top down method: Under this method, the
top levels are actively involved in planning
process. They formulate goals, policies,
programs and strategies of the organization
and circulate to the lower levels for their
implementation. The middle and lower levels
do not participated in planning process. The
top down approach assumes that the top
levels only have knowledge, skills and
authorities of planning.
ORGANIZATION PLANNING
METHODS
2. Bottom-up method: This is opposite to the
top down method. Under this method, the
middle and lower levels formulate plans and
lend to the top level for change and
adjustment. The top levels do not give any and
suggestions to the lower levels. This method
assumes that the lower levels have proper
knowledge and capability of planning. This is a
participatory method of planning. It follows
the democratic ways planning. Hence, it is
easier to implement the plans. of directions
ORGANIZATION PLANNING
METHODS
3. Mixed method: This method is the combination of top
down and bottom up methods. Under this method, the
top level provides necessary direction about pl anning to
the lower levels regarding the nature structure of pl an.
However, the lower l evel s have autonomy and fl ex ibil ity
on the planning process. The l ower l evel s, prepare pl ans
present to the top l evel . The pl an is discussed with the
lower levels and and and final ized. Al l the l ev el s of the
organizations activel y participate in pl anning process.
Hence, it is easier to impl ement the pl an. Management by
objective (MBO) is an exampl e of mix ed method of
planning.
ORGANIZATION PLANNING
METHODS
4. Team method: Under this method, a team is
formed for formulating plans. The team consists of
line managers and staff exports who work under the
leadership of chief executive or chairperson. The
team gathers information from external and internal
sources and prepares plans accordingly. The plans
are finally reviewed and approved by the top level or
BOD. This method is also a participatory method of
planning.
TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONAL
STRUCTURES
ERTICAL STRUCTURES (FUNCTIONAL AND DIVISIONAL)
Two main types of vertical structure exist,
functional and divisional. The functional
structure divides work and employees by
specialization. It is a hierarchical, usually
vertically integrated, structure. It emphasizes
standardization in organization and
processes for specialized employees in
relatively narrow jobs.
TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONAL
STRUCTURES
This traditional type of organization forms departments
such as production, sales, research and development,
accounting, HR, and marketing. Each department has a
separate function and specializes in that area. For example,
all HR professionals are part of the same function and
report to a senior leader of HR. The same reporting process
would be true for other functions, such as finance or
operations.
In functional structures, employees report directly to
managers within their functional areas who in turn report to
a chief officer of the organization. Management from above
must centrally coordinate the specialized departments.
TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONAL
STRUCTURES
MATRIX ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES
TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONAL
STRUCTURES
Hollow organizations
TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONAL
STRUCTURES
Modular organizations
Modular structures differ from hollow organizations in that components of a
product are outsourced. Modular structures may keep a core part of the
product in-house and outsource noncore portions of the product. Networks
are added or subtracted as needs change. For a modular structure to be an
option, the product must be able to be broken into chunks. For example,
computer manufacturer Dell buys parts from various suppliers and assembles
them at one central location. Suppliers at one end and customers at the other
become part of the organization; the organization shares information and
innovations with all. Customization of products and services results from
flexibility, creativity, teamwork and responsiveness. Business decisions are
made at corporate, divisional, project and individual team member levels.
TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONAL
STRUCTURES
Virtual organizations
A virtual organization (sometimes called a network structure)
is cooperation among companies, institutions or individuals
delivering a product or service under a common business
understanding. Organizations form partnerships with others
—often competitors—that complement each other. The
collaborating units present themselves as a unified
organization.
ORGANIZATIONAL ARCHETYPES
Functional-oriented:
Organizations optimize
for expertise, division
and reducing cost. These
organizations centralize
expertise and have tall
hierarchical structures.
Ex. Server admins, SREs,
Data admins
ORGANIZATIONAL ARCHETYPES
Matrix-oriented:
Organizations attempt to
combine functional and
market orientation. This
results in complicated
organization structures
like a single person
reporting to multiple
managers etc.
ORGANIZATIONAL ARCHETYPES
Market-oriented:
Organizations optimize for
responding quickly to
customer needs. These
organizations tend to be flat,
composed of multiple cross-
functional disciplines (ex.
marketing, engineering,
machine learning).
Each market-oriented team is
responsible for feature
delivery, operational tracking
and service support.
SYMPTOMS OF AN INADEQUATE
ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE
1. Mismatched hierarchies.
How many layers of management your organization has and how you
structure employees will depend on both the size of your organization and
your strategic objectives.
DESIGN PROCESS
professionals like programmers, printers, or manufacturers)
Revise the solution as technical issues arise or new aspects are
discovered that you had not addressed
Note that often the design needs revision as it is implemented.
While a detailed design process seeks to gather all critical STEPS
information so the designer doesn’t miss anything, sometimes
new details arise during production, and that’s unavoidable
simply because the production effort is often a complex
process in itself (for example, programming work). Because of
that, designers need to partner with the people implementing
their designs and address any new issues that pop up during
production. Bridging the gap between design concerns and
technical concerns creates a better product, so you should
never skip this step.
Measure
The final step is to measure how successful
the design is after it’s put into use. Again,
while good planning allows designers to
make informed decisions, no design is
flawless and sometimes the environment
changes. Because of that, especially in DESIGN PROCESS
digital design, designers are involved with
measuring the design’s performance. STEPS
2. Co-ordination principle. This principle states that activities that are done should be
coordinated in a single unit. This unit can be a business unit, business function,
(horizontally coordinating) overlay unit, sub-business, core resource unit, shared service
unit, project unit, or parent unit. The test here is if there needs to be coordination
between departments which is hard to do. These ‘difficult links’ are links where normal
networking will not provide coordination benefits. In that case, coordination should be
made easier, or responsibility should be put in within a single unit. There are many
different units that can be used in organizational design, as we will show below.
3. Knowledge and competence principle. This principle states that responsibilities should
be allocated to the person or team best fit to do them. This means that tasks are
retained by higher levels based on their knowledge and competitive advantage. If this is
not the case, they should be positioned lower in the organization.
This means that the CEO should not be involved in every decision – especially not
decisions that involve specialists with much more subject-matter knowledge. The CEO is
there for the big picture and to balance complex decisions that impact the organization
and strategy.
4. Control and commitment principle. This principle is about having effective control on
the one hand while maintaining engagement and commitment on the other hand. This is
always a balance. The test here is to have a control process that is aligned with the unit’s
responsibility, cost-efficient to implement, and motivating for the people in the unit.
This means that the CEO is not giving the ‘go’ on the purchase decision for a $30
keyboard – this would be highly demotivating, and control on such small expenditures
should be put lower in the organization to be adaptive anyway.
5. Innovation and adaptation principle. This principle states that organizational
structures should be sufficiently flexible to adapt to an ever-changing world. The
test here is that the organizational design will help the development of new
strategies and adaptation to future changes. Later in this article, we will give a
case study of an organization that was unable to adapt to a rapidly changing
environment, hurting its internal processes and bottom line.
Organization
Planning and
Implementation
Contingency
Contingency plans wait in the wings in case of a crisis or
unforeseen event. Contingency plans cover a range of possible
scenarios and appropriate responses for issues varying from
personnel planning to advanced preparation for outside
occurrences that could negatively impact the business. Companies
may have contingency plans for things like how to respond to a
natural disaster, malfunctioning software, or the sudden departure
of a C-level executive.
1. Develop the strategic plan
Steps in this initial stage include:
goal
Develop processes for reviewing goal achievement to
make sure strategic and tactical goals are being met,
like running a CRM report every quarter and
submitting it to the Chief Revenue Officer to check
that the sales department is hitting its quota
Develop contingency plans, like what to do in case
the sales team’s CRM malfunctions or there’s a data
breach
3. Plan daily operations
Operational plans, or the processes that determine
how individual employees spend their day, are largely
the responsibility of middle managers and the
employees that report to them. For example, the
process that a sales rep follows to find, nurture, and IMPLEMENTATION
convert a lead into a customer is an operational plan.
Work schedules, customer service workflows, or