Vulnerability of Bridges To Fire - Iabmas2012 - Giuliani
Vulnerability of Bridges To Fire - Iabmas2012 - Giuliani
Vulnerability of Bridges To Fire - Iabmas2012 - Giuliani
Vulnerability
of bridges to fire
and explosions
CHAIRPERSONS
Luisa Giuliani Christos Georgakis
[email protected] [email protected]
Civil Engineering Department,
Technical University of Denmark
SS05: WeA-4
Orchidea Room, 14:00-16:00
Session outline - List of contributions
1. Vulnerability of bridges to fire - Giuliani L., Crosti C., Gentili F.
F 2. Evaluation of structural risk for bridges under fire - Gentili F., Petrini F.
I
3. Adapting OpenSees to simulate brisdge structures in fire - Usmani A., Jiang Y., Jiang J.,
R
E JiangL L., Welch S.
4. Evacuation of mixed population from trains on bridges - Kindler C., Soerensen J.G.,
Dederichs A.S.
B
S 5. Experimental testing of blast resistance FRC and RC bridges - Foglar M., Kovar M.,
L
T
A Kohoutkova A.
6. The real-time alarming technique of ship-collision to long span bridges based on the
I A
M C displacement data of expansion joint - Zhang Y.F., Zhu S.C., Zhang L.T.
P T 7. Repair and dynamic-based condition assessment of impact damage to a freeway overpass
F bridge near Mossel Bay, South Africa - Newmark A.A., Moyo P., Kruger E.J.
U
A 8. Consequence-based robustness assessment of bridge structures - Brando F., Cao L.,
R
I
E Olmati P., Gkoumas K.
L
IABMAS 2012
6th International Conference on
Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management
Stresa, Lake Maggiore, Italy 6-8 July, 2012
4
considerations bridge damages consequences
The slackline case
CONSEQUENCES
MATTER!
bridge damages
Fire- induced
considerations
Conclusive
occupancy
bridge damages
fire
Fire- induced
self-weight
snow explosions
prestressing
temperature impacts
superstructure
wind local failures
considerations
PERMANENT ACCIDENTAL
Conclusive
AVOID
AVOID FAILURE AND DISPROPORTIONATE
MANTAIN SERVICEABILITY RESPONSE
considerations
PERMANENT ACCIDENTAL
Conclusive
INTEGRITY
STIFFNESS (SLS) (ALS)
PERMANENT ACCIDENTAL
Conclusive
PC susceptibility
Y
Consequences
bridge damages
failures
Fire- induced
Vunerability
propagate?
Y N
damage
Exposure Robustness
triggers?
Y
Safety walls
N
structure is
considerations
Structural Integrity
Conclusive
hit?
Collapse Safety
Downtime Demolition
Evacuation and rebuilt
and repair
bridge damages
Fire- induced
PC susceptibility
Vunerability
Exposure
considerations
Conclusive
1 1
0 0
2 2
1 1
0 0
2 2
1 1
bridge damages
0 0
Fire- induced
2 2
1 1
0 0
2 2
1 1
0 0
2 2
considerations
1 1
Conclusive
0 0
2 2
1 1
0 0
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
one of the 368 hangers caught fire on the M1 pylon and collapsed, damaging the
adjacent cable and crushing onto the deck
the fire could be due to by lightning strike or sparked by wires rubbing which run
considerations
Conclusive
Short time resistance (vulnerability) High costs ($90 mil) for repair and
Conclusive
Collapse confined between two piers; rebuilt, loss in toll revenue, and free
no propagation below (robustness) public transp. after the accident).
(photo by Tj Morales, 29 Apr 2007, licensed under Creative Common Attribution)
STATISTICAL (occurrence)
More than 20 bridge fires have been reported since 1995, which
corresponds to a frequency of more than one occurrence per year
in the past 17 years.
bridge damages
Fire- induced
VULNERABILITY
In the majority of cases, bridge structures were severely damaged and
high repair costs had to be sustained.
Structural fire design of single elements against fire is advisable
bridge damages
Fire- induced
ROBUSTENSS
The majority of the bridges damaged by fires did not collapses and only
in few cases in few cases major structural collapse occurred or the
bridge had to be demolished.
considerations
Conclusive
COSTS
Even when limited structural damages had occurred, high costs
deriving from repair and temporary closure (loss of income and of
considerations