0% found this document useful (0 votes)
173 views7 pages

Carcar City College: Republic of The Philippines Luan-Luan, Poblacion 1, Carcar City, Cebu 032-5643052

This document appears to be a performance evaluation form for instructors at Carcar City College in the Philippines. It contains several key result areas that are rated on a scale of 0 to 5, including quality of instruction, professional exposure, research and creative work, pursuit of further education, and support for students. The form collects information on an instructor's adherence to course syllabi, development of instructional materials, participation in professional organizations, completion of action research, and enrollment in graduate programs to evaluate their performance.

Uploaded by

Nova katipunan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
173 views7 pages

Carcar City College: Republic of The Philippines Luan-Luan, Poblacion 1, Carcar City, Cebu 032-5643052

This document appears to be a performance evaluation form for instructors at Carcar City College in the Philippines. It contains several key result areas that are rated on a scale of 0 to 5, including quality of instruction, professional exposure, research and creative work, pursuit of further education, and support for students. The form collects information on an instructor's adherence to course syllabi, development of instructional materials, participation in professional organizations, completion of action research, and enrollment in graduate programs to evaluate their performance.

Uploaded by

Nova katipunan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Republic of the Philippines

CARCAR CITY COLLEGE


Luan-luan, Poblacion 1, Carcar City, Cebu
032-5643052

Name of Instructor:________________________________________ Status : ( ) Full Time ( ) Part Time


Position/Designation _______________________________________ Rater:_______________________________________________
Subjects/Courses Handled :___________________________________
Class/Block Advisory Assignment :_____________________________ Date of Review:_________________________________________
Rating Period: ____________Semester, AY 20______,20__________ Conforme: (Ratee’s Signature:______________________________

KEY Objectives Performance Indicators Actual Result /Performance KRA Rating Score
RESULT Weight
Classroom
AREA I
Instruction 5 All or 100% of the contact hours(54 hrs/subject) of classes within the
A. Quality conforms semester followed the flow of lessons and presentations in the IMD-
with Course approved Course Syllabus. 15%
of
Syllabus
Instruction basing on 4 90% to 99% of the contact hours (at least 45 hours) of classes within the
1.Preparati CHED – semester followed the flow of lessons and presentations in the IMD-
on/Enhanc OBE/QA approved Course Syllabus.
ement of program
Course outcomes, 3- 80% to 89% of the contact hours( at least 40 hours ) of classes within the
Syllabus as competenci semester followed the flow of lessons and presentations in the IMD-
es, lesson approved Course Syllabus.
authoritati
deliveries
ve basis for ,among 2- 70% to 79% of the contact hours (at least 35 hours ) of classes within the
outcomes- others. semester followed the flow of lessons and presentations in the IMD-
based approved Course Syllabus
education
quality of 1-below 69% of the contact hours (at most 30 hours )of classes within the
instruction semester followed the flow of lessons and presentations in the IMD-
approved Course Syllabus
0- Topics, lessons and activities as indicated in the certified Course
Syllabus are never followed.

2.Produc Develops, 5- 90 to 99 % of the subjects handled are provided with SILMs/learning


tion of constructs, packs, modules, etc. with Ratee as main author
Instruction 15%
al produces, 4- 80-89% of the subjects handled are provided with SILMs/learning packs,
materials/ and utilizes
modules as co-author
SILM/Sessi IMD –
on Guide approved 3- 70-79% of the subjects handled are provided with SILMs/learning packs,
quality
modules in collaboration with two or three other Instructors handling same
instructiona
l materials course/subject

2-one of the subjects handled is totally adopted from other Instructors’


SILMs/learning packs, etc

1-all instructional materials are adopted from other instructors.

3. Student 5 – Accomplishment & submission within the 14 working days timeframe.


Punctuality
in the Manual 4- Accomplishment & submission 1-3 working days after deadline.
Submission ,Section
of 3- Accomplishment & submission 4-6 working days after deadline.
65,letters
Academic
Require- 2- Accomplishment & submission 7-9 working days after deadline .
D&H
ments
1- Accomplishment & submission 10-15 working days after deadline

0- Accomplishment & submission done the semester following the time of


mandatory submission.

(Note: Exemption applies to Thesis Writing ,counting is reckoned from the


period of extension as indicated in the letter for extension, as approved by
the BOT Chair.
3. Planning Rating Scale adopts the Performance Rating Sheet based on the rated observation of 20%
and classes ,with rate conformed by Instructor. (The Classroom Observation Checklist is
Delivery of adopted as the basis for the rating of the Instructor in this area).
Instruc
tion
KEY Takes 5- Is an officer of at least one recognized professional association and served
RESULT active as trainor in at least one training on any field of specialization for
AREA II participatio professional advancement
n in
1. Quality recognized 4-Is a member of at least one recognized association and served as 5%
of professiona facilitator/moderator in at least one training on any field of specialization for
Profession l
professional advancement
al organizatio
Exposure n/s ; 3-Is a member of at least one recognized association and actively
trainer/facil
participated attended at least one training/seminar –workshop equivalent
itator of a
seminar; to eight hours within the rating period
attends
seminar- 2-Not a member of any recognized association and attended
workshop training/seminar-workshop equivalent to four hours, within the rating
in field of period
specializa-
tion. 1 Not a member of any recognized association and has not attended any
training within the rating period.

0-By own volition, deliberately expressing unfavorable/negative perception


about any membership on duly constituted organization/s.

2. Conducts 5- Has presented a terminated Action Research, with recommendations


Research, Action implemented by concerned offices/personnel leading to positive changes,
& Research and/or authored and published one research/creative work within the 15%
Creative that leads
past two academic years
Work to the
solution of 4-Is on the process of data-gathering to complete Action Research approved
challenges,
by the College Research Council, within the rating period
issues and
concern in 3-Has presented Action Research proposal, approved by the Action Research
instruction,
Council
classroom
manageme
nt, student 2-Is on the process of proofreading proposed Action Research scheduled
performanc for proposal presentation , within the rating period
e and
achieveme 1- Is yet on the planning and initial phase of writing an Action Research
nt and proposal, within the rating period
other
academic- 0-No action research conducted within the rating period.
related
matters.

3. Pursues Continues 5- Has Completed post graduate studies, obviously competent and well-
relevant professiona informed with latest developments in line with field of specialization
graduate/p l education 10%
ostgraduat to be 4-Has completed graduate studies and is currently enrolled in a post-
e program aligned graduate program
with recent
developme 3- Has completed masteral degree in area of specialization
nts in the
field of 2-Is enrolled in masteral program and currently on thesis writing ,within the
specializa rating period
tion 1-Is currently enrolled in masteral degree program and has earned 9 nine
units ,at the time of the rating period.

0-Not enrolled in graduate/post graduate studies within the rating period.


KEY 5- Not incurred any absence within the rating period; maintained
RESULT communication and respected exercise of academic freedom of students
AREA III (e.g. students’ queries of grades, inclusivity of students in the transactions of 10%
flexibility provisions in course guidelines); initiates activities intended to
1.Support advance students’ competence and chance of passing licensure
for
examinations/civil service eligibility examinations
Students
4-Incurred one to two valid absences within the rating period, provides
a.Attendan opportunities for students to improve academic performance; and allows
ce students to practice their learned competencies purposely for job placement
and for possibility of passing licensure and other civil service eligibility
examinations

3-Incurred three to five absences within the rating period, shows genuine
concern about students’ performance in his/her classes

2- Incurred more than five absences, five times of tardiness in reporting to


his/her classes ,and does not show genuine concern for students’
performance in his/her classes

1-Incurred more than five absences and tardiness and shows uncaring
attitude about students’ performance.

0-Incurred more than ten unexcused absences as well as frequent tardiness


within the rating period.
b.Values 5-Models deeds of patriotism and nationalism. No absence made during flag
of raising and flag lowering ceremonies.
Patriotism
& 4-Models deeds of patriotism and nationalism, but committed 1 to 2
Nationalis absences in the flag raising and flag lowering ceremonies.
m 3-Preaches patriotism and nationalism but committed 3 to 4 absences
during flag raising and flag lowering ceremonies.

2-Preaches patriotism and nationalism but committed 5 to 6 absences


during flag raising and flag lowering ceremonies.

1-Speaks about patriotism and nationalism but committed 7 to 8 absences


during the flag raising and flag lowering ceremonies.

KEY 5 – Initiated and led a team in conducting at least five (5) instances of
RESULT community extension activities to an adopted barangay, resulting to positive
AREA IV outcome of targeted results, as indicated in the Action Plan submitted and
approved by the BOT. 10%
1.
Communit 4- Led a team in conducting at least three instances of community extension
y activities to an adopted barangay, with result under monitoring and
Extension evaluation.
Activities
3-Served as a member of a team in the conduct of at least three community
extension activities to an adopted barangay, with MOA but result under
monitoring and evaluation

2- Served as a member of a team in the conduct of at least two community


extension activities to an adopted barangay, with MOA but result under
monitoring and evaluation

1 Served as a member of a team in the conduct of at least one instance of


community extension to an adopted barangay.

0-No participation of any community extension program within the rating


period.
Overall Rating: ______________________________________
Adjectival Rating: ____________________________________
Rating Continuum
5.0 - 4.20- Outstanding (All criteria in the Key Result Areas are met, and elements are achieved at a level of excellence that provides a MODEL FOR OTHERS
4.19 - 3.40 Very Satisfactory (Most of the criteria in the Key Result Areas are met, with most elements demonstrating GOOD PRACTICE
3.39- 2.60 Satisfactory (The criteria are met in most respects, but improvement is needed to overcome weakness in some elements
2.59 - 1.80 Unsatisfactory (The criteria are met in some respects, but much improvement is needed to overcome weaknesses.
1.79- - 1.0 Poor (The criteria re not met)

For the Rating Period First Semester AY 2022-2023

Conforme:
_________________________________________ ____________________________________________
Instructor/Ratee Department Head/Rater
Date: ________________________ Date: ______________________________
Noted:

LEONARDO E. LACOSTALES, PhD REVILINA S. LOPINA, PhD


Dean, Academic Affairs College President/Administrator
Recommending Approval: Approved:

ELOISA R. CABALUNA HON. MAYOR MARIO PATRICIO P. BARCENAS


BOT Sec/HR Director BOT Chair/City Mayor

You might also like