0% found this document useful (0 votes)
57 views1 page

HMK 6

The document contains proofs of four mathematical statements: 1) A set S is bounded if and only if it is contained within a closed bounded interval. 2) The intersection of intervals [0,1/n] for n from 1 to infinity equals {0}. 3) The intersection of intervals (0,1/n) for n from 1 to infinity is empty. 4) The intersection of intervals (n,infinity) for n from 1 to infinity is empty. It also explains how to find the rational numbers represented by two periodic decimals.

Uploaded by

Hana Kholifatul
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
57 views1 page

HMK 6

The document contains proofs of four mathematical statements: 1) A set S is bounded if and only if it is contained within a closed bounded interval. 2) The intersection of intervals [0,1/n] for n from 1 to infinity equals {0}. 3) The intersection of intervals (0,1/n) for n from 1 to infinity is empty. 4) The intersection of intervals (n,infinity) for n from 1 to infinity is empty. It also explains how to find the rational numbers represented by two periodic decimals.

Uploaded by

Hana Kholifatul
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

1 Section 2.

5 - 2, 7, 8, 9, 17
1. 2. If S ⊆ < is nonempty, show that S is bounded if and only if
there exists a closed bounded interval I such that S ⊆ I.

Proof. (⇒) If S is bounded, then there exists u = sup(S) and v = inf(S).


Define the interval I := [v, u] and S is contained in I.
(⇐) If there exists an interval I such that S ⊆ I = [a, b] then a ≤ s for
all s ∈ S and likewise, b ≥ s for all s ∈ S. Since S is bounded above and
below, S, by definition, is bounded.
T∞
2. 7. Let In := [0, 1/n] for n ∈ N . Prove that n=1 In = {0}.

Proof. It’s clear that 0 is in the intersection. The question that comes up
is: Is there another number in the set? To prove this, we use contradiction.
Suppose x is in the intersection, then by 2.4.5 there exists some k ∈ N so
that 1/k < x. This then means that for all n ≥ k we have 1/n < x. We
conclude that x is NOT in any interval In for n ≥ k or that x ∈ / In for
n ≥ k contradicting x was in the infinite intersection.
T∞
3. 8. Let Jn := (0, 1/n) for n ∈ N . Prove that n=1 Jn = ∅.

Proof. Since 0 is not in ANY set, it cannot be in the intersection. Again,


we use contradiction to assume there is an element in the infinite inter-
section and just as in Exercise 7, we show that it cannot happen.
T∞
4. 9. Let Kn := (n, ∞) for n ∈ N . Prove that n=1 Kn = ∅.
A little different than the previous proofs, but similar none-the-
less.

Proof. Assume there is an element, x, in the infinite intersection. Then


by the Archimedean Property (2.4.3), there exists k ∈ N such that x < k.
This means that x ∈
/ Ik for any n ≥ k. Hence, x couldn’t be in the infinite
intersection.

5. 17. What rationals are represented by the periodic decimals


1.25137 · · · 137 · · · and 35.14653 · · · 653 · · · ?
Using the process outlined in the book (and in algebra classes),
set x = 1.2513 · · · 137 · · · and then multiply by the appropriate
power of 10 to line up the repeating part (1000 in this case),
1000x = 1251.37 · · · 137 · · · . Subtrace the two equations and solve
for x. Make sure you multiply by the appropriate number to RE-
MOVE the decimal in the numerator. Solution is x = 125012/99900
and x = 3511139/99900.

You might also like