JJJ
JJJ
ABSTRACT
One of a series of educational packages designed for
implementation either in a workshop atmosphere or through individual
study, this Hot Topic guide presents a variety of materials to assist
educators in designing and implementing classroom projects and
activities centering on the topic of research about teaching reading.
The Hot Topic guide contains guidelines for workshop use; an overview
of research-based guidelines for teachers and parents about teaching
reading (parent involvement, emergent literacy, phonics,
comprehension strategies,and the teacher's belief that all children
can learn); and 7 articles (from scholarly and professional journals)
and ERIC documents on the topic. A 68-item annotated bibliography of
items in the ERIC database on the topic is attached. (RS)
***********************************************************************
Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made
from the original document.
***********************************************************************
HOT TOPIC
GUIDE 26
What Works? Summary of Research about Teaching Reading
REVISED EDITION
4,;`,;(1j.;;;«,,..,
Va .
^4
ZT47771:::;"*"
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
OVERVIEW/LECTURE
What Works? Summary of Research about Teaching Reading
by Carl B. Smith, Ph.D.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
A collection of selected references and abstracts obtained directly from the ERIC
database.
School of Education
Compilers: Carl B. Smith and Christopher Essex
Series Editors: Carl Smith, Eleanor Macfarlane, and Christopher Essex
aa5
This document has been reproduced as
received from the person or organization
originating it. VV...-4
Minor changes have been made to
improve reproduction quality.
2
In-Service Workshops and Seminars:
Suggestions for Using this Hot Topic Guide as a
Professional Development Tool
Before the Workshop:
Carefully review the materials presented in this Hot Topic Guide.
Think about how these
concepts and projects might be applied to your particular
school or district.
As particular concepts begin to stand out in your mind
as being important, use the
Bibliography section (found at the end of the packet)
to seek out additional resources
dealing specifically with those concepts.
Look over the names of the teachers and researchers
who wrote the packet articles
and/or are listed in the Bibliography. Are any of the
names
them work in your geographical area? Do you have colleagues
familiar to you? Do any of
are engaged in similar research and/or teaching? Perhaps or acquaintances who
you could enlist their help and
expertise as you plan your workshop or seminar.
As you begin to plan your activities, develop a mental "movie"
of what you'd like to see
happening in the classroom as a result of this in- service workshop
vision in mind as a guide to your planning. or seminar. Keep this
3
After the Workshop:
Follow up on the work you have done. Have your workshop
attendees fill out an End-
of-Session Evaluation (a sample is included
on the next page). Emphasize that their
responses are anonymous. The participants' answers to these
helpful in planning your next workshop. After questions can be very
a reasonable
months or a semester), contact your workshop attendees amount of time (say a few
have used, or haven't used, the workshop and inquire about how they
concepts in their teaching. Have any
surprising results come up? Are there any unforeseen
problems?
When teachers are trying the new techniques,
suggest that they invite you to observe
their classes. As you discover success stories
among teachers from your workshop,
share them with the other attendees, partiCularly those who seem reluctant to give the
ideas a try.
Find out what other topics your participants
would like to see covered in future
workshops and seminars. There are nearly sixty Hot
Topic Guides, and more are always
being developed. Whatever your focus, there is probably
help. An order form follows the table of a Hot Topic Guide that can
contents in this packet.
1)
2)
3)
Are there additional resources mentioned in the Bibliography that would be worth
locating? Which ones? How could you get them most easily?
Are there resource people available in your area whom you might consult about this
topic and/or invite to participate? Who are they?
What would you like to see happen in participants' classrooms as a result of this
workshop? Be as specific as possible.
5
Agenda for Workshop
Planning Sheet
Introduction/Overview:
[What would be the most effective way to present the major concepts
that you wish to convey?]
Activities that involve participants and incorporate the main concepts of this workshop:
1)
2)
Applications:
Encourage participants to plan a mini-lesson for their educational setting that
draws on these concepts. [One possibility is to work in small groups, during
the workshop, to make a plan and then share it with other participants.]
Your plan to make this happen:
Evaluation:
[Use the form on the next page, or one you design, to get feedback from
participants about your presentation.]
6
' ,
END-OF-SESSION EVALUFITION
Now that today's meeting is over, we would like to know how you feel and what you think about
the things we did so that we can make them better. Your opinion is important to us. Please
answer all questions honestly. Your answers are confidential.
9. Please write one thing that could have been improved today:
What works? Every parent and teacher wants to find the ideas and
techniques that help their children succeed in reading and writing. But as is true in
any complex human endeavor it is not always clear what works to bring success.
One thing seems fairly clear: the role and the beliefs of the teacher are
important to a student's success. If the teacher believes that all her students can
be successful, they usually will. If the teacher has a wide repertoire of knowledge
and skills, she will employ them in helping all children, no matter what her main
instructional method may be. Even so, we ought to be able to guide teachers and
parents as a result of the thousands of studies that have been aimed at
determining what works in learning to read and to write.
Synthesis of Research
In this unit you will find other attempts to arrive at a synthesis, at least of
certain aspects of learning to read. Though there is much on which we may never
agree, it seems to me that the research summaries offer us a number of guidelines
about teaching and learning.
9
We will try here to imitate the tone of the documents from the US
Department of Education and provide guidelines that enable teachers and schools
to take practical steps to help children. At the same time, we realize that we
cannot reduce the teaching of reading to a limited set of steps and procedures.
The learning environment at home and in school contribute their own powerful
influence. The guidelines that we will state here, however, enable a teacher or a
parent to examine what they do: "Am I acting in an appropriate manner?" "Does
it make sense for me to change the way that I interact with children?"
We know that one of the best ways for children to improve their reading
ability is to read a lot. Extensive reading is as likely to be fostered in the home as
it is in the school. By working together, school and home can have a significant
effect on the fluency of children's reading. That means that books have to be
available in both places, and significant time has to be devoted to reading those
books. Unfortunately, the average elementary school child spends only eleven
minutes a day in extended text reading, but he or she spends more than 130
minutes a day watching television.
These types of activities help children become more confident and more
competent in the use of their language. Parents and teachers of young children
need to be especially attentive to the child's desire to communicate. Grammatical
accuracy and correct spelling will come with time. First, children need to feel that
0
they have ideas that they can communicate to others. Gradually they will learn
the standard conventions of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Teachers may refer to the child's emerging awareness of print and its real-
world functions as "emergent literacy." The word "literacy" often replaces the
words "reading" and "writing" in today's journals as researchers try to make us
aware of the integrated relationship among listening, speaking, reading, and
writing in the complex environment of printed messages. The use of the word
"literacy" reminds us, then, that our involvement in printed communications leads
us into interactions with others and with ourselves as we construct meaning.
Phonics should be taught early and taught as a tool to better reading, not as
a series of isolated drills in the pronunciation of sounds. It should never interfere
with the excitement of building meaning; rather, phonics intervention should act as
a means of building meaning. Once the sound-symbol link has been established
and the major sound-symbol patterns are learned, reading instruction can continue
to expand through vocabulary building, comprehension strategies, and thinking
skills.
Following their reading, a discussion helps learners pull together the ideas
they have experienced. Alternatively, a reader may respond to a selection in
writing, perhaps even just for himself or herself. The evidence of today's studies,
however, convinces us that the public exchange of ideas about a shared reading is
one of the best ways of helping a variety of individuals decide what they now
know and understand. Comprehending the message remains the goal of reading
throughout the learner's engagement with it.
This commitment to helping the learner in a direct way means that the
effective teacher of reading establishes goals and objectives in which all students
can participate. Those are the community goals of the school and the class. After
that, there are many opportunities for individual interests and personal learning to
take place. However, how some teachers are able to maintain high levels of
individual interest, while at the same time keeping a variety of students on target,
is still one of the mysteries of teaching. Research has no simple prescription for
how that is accomplished. Some of the central ingredients in a dynamic and
effective classroom can be mixed together only by the artistry of the teacher.
12
Combining research evidence with the artistry of the teacher is what leads
eventually to effectiveness in schools.
Conclusions
What works in learning to read and write involves complex issues, and they
need to be discussed again and again to increase our understanding of them.
Informal discussions and planned staff development time needs to offer teachers
the opportunities for these discussions.
From the material contained in this learning unit, we can draw a number of
conclusions that lead to action steps by teacher and parent:
2. Teachers and parents need to show children that reading is a joy and that
it also takes work to become skilled, proficient readers and writers. Parents
and teachers need to work together to promote this attitude of joy and to
spend the time it takes to become skilled.
13
What,Dges Research Say About Reading? http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areasislW esysisir read .111111
.
In 1985, David Pearson referred to "the comprehension revolution." In essence he was talking about the
movement from traditional views of reading based on behaviorism to visions of reading and readers based
on cognitive psychology.
What follows in this section are major findings from cognitive psychology regarding:
These findings were developed by NCREL in collaboration with our Content Partner, the Center for the
Study of Reading, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, and the participants in Program 1, "Children
as Strategic Readers."
The traditional view of the learner as an "empty" vessel to be filled with knowledge from external
sources is exemplified by this statue at the University of Leuven (Belgium).
1 of 114
What Does Research Say About Reading? http://www.ncrel.org/sdrstareas/stw_esys/str ;ead.htm
Reader
Reprinted from the Guide to Curriculum Planning in Reading with permission from the Wisconsin
Department of Public Instruction
Comprehension results from an interaction among the reader, the strategies the reader employs,
the material being read, and the context in which reading takes place.
1. Meaning is not in the words on the page. The reader constructs meaning by making inferences and
interpretations.
2. Reading researchers believe that information is stored in long-term memory in organized "knowledge
structures." The essence of learning is linking new information to prior knowledge about the topic, the
text structure or genre, and strategies for learning.
3. How well a reader constructs meaning depends in part on metacognition, the reader's ability to think
about and control the learning process (i.e., to plan, monitor comprehension, and revise the use of
strategies and comprehension); and attribution, beliefs about the relationship among performance, effort,
15
2 of 14
WhatDoes Research Say About Reading? http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areasistw_esys,str read .11 t
and responsibility.
4. Reading and writing are integrally related. That is, reading and writing have many characteristics in
common. Also, readers increase their comprehension by writing, and reading about the topic improves
writing performance.
5. Collaborative learning is a powerful approach for teaching and learning. The goal of collaborative
learning is to establish a community of learners in which students are able to generate questions and
discuss ideas freely with the teacher and each other. Students often engage in teaching roles to help other
students learn and to take responsibility for learning. This approach involves new roles for teachers.
Think understanding occurs from Understand that they mus t take respo
"getting the words right", re-reading for constructing meaning using their
knowledge
Have relatively low self esteem Have self confidence that they are e
learners; see self as agent, able to
their potential
See success and failure as the result of See success as the result of
luck or teacher bias hard work and efficient thinking
2. Movement from traditional skills instruction to cognitive strategy instruction, whole language
approaches, and teaching strategies within the content areas
3. More emphasis on integrating reading, writing, and critical thinking with content instruction, wherever
possible
4. More organization of reading instruction in phases with iterative cycles of strategies: Preparing for
reading-activates prior knowledge by brainstorming or summarizing previous learnings, surveys headings
and graphics, predicts topics and organizational patterns, sets goals/purpose for reading, chooses
appropriate strategies
Reflecting on the information-reviews/summarizes the main ideas from the text as a whole,
considers/verifies how these ideas are related, changes prior knowledge according to new !earnings,
assesses achievement or purpose for learning, identifies gaps in learning, generates questions and next
steps
2. Documentation that instruction in the vast majority of classrooms is text driven and that most teachers
do not provide comprehension instruction
3. Documentation that textbooks were very poorly written, making information in them difficult to learn;
subsequent response of the textbook industry to include real literature, longer selections, more
open-ended questions, less fragmented skills, and "more considerate" text
4. Changes in reading research designs from narrowly conceived and well-controlled laboratory
experiments with college students to (1) broadly conceived training studies using experimenters and real
teachers in real classrooms and (2) studies involving teachers as researchers and colleagues in pre-service
and in-service contexts
5. Publication of A Nation. of Readers reaching out to parents, policymakers, and community members as
legitimate audiences for direct dissemination of research information
6. Involvement of state education agencies in textbook selection, promoting "the new definition of
reading," and developing statewide assessment programs that are research based; especially important are
programs in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Illinois which have longer passages, more focus on
comprehension, more than one right answer, strategy use, and assessment of prior knowledge.
7. Increasing dissatisfaction with standardized methods of assessing reading (Consequently, there has
been a movement to develop alternative assessment strategies including miscue analysis, portfolios, and
projects in the classroom.)
2. Although pullout programs and tracking may be well intended, reading researchers increasingly argue
17
4 of 14
What Does Research Say About Reading? http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/stw_esys/str_read.him
that such programs may actually create or extend inequities by segregating students at risk in poor quality
programs. Indeed, some researchers contend that the learned helplessness that may characterize students
at risk is a functional response to the demands of a dysfunctional situation.
3. An increasing amount of research indicates that student access to functional adult role models is vital
for the development of self-esteem and metacognitive abilities. This can come from adult tutors or
opportunities for students to participate in the world of work through work/study, shadowing, and
apprenticeship programs.
2. Reading performance is enhanced when schools have semipermeable boundaries. That is, when:
*Parents and other community members are involved in the life of the school as tutors, local experts, role
models, and aides in schools
*******************************************************
1. Use the checklist found at the end of this section to evaluate your school and teaching approaches.
*What outcomes do the teachers in this program accomplish that I want my students to achieve?
18
5 of 14
What Does Research Say About Reading? http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areasistw_esys/str:read.htm
3. Form a team and initiate a research project. A research project can be designed to generate working
solutions to a problem. The issues for your research group to address are:
4. Investigate community needs and integrate solutions within your class activities. Relevant questions
include:
*What needs does the community have in terms of reading and writing?
*What can be done (for example, training) by my class to meet community needs?
*What skills and resources does the community have that could benefit my students?
5. Establish "Community of Learners" support groups consisting of school personnel and community
members. The goals of these groups are to:
19
6 of 14
What Dues Research Say About Reading? http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/stw_esysistr read.htin
1. Visit your school informally for discussions using the checklist on page 23.
*Chamber of Commerce groups could sponsor field trips or opportunities for storytelling.
*Local fraternal organizations could help tutor students and provide a place for them to read.
3. Consider ways that schools and community members can work together to provide:
*Materials for a rich learning environment (e.g., real literature in print and audio form, computers)
*Opportunities for students to access adults as role models, tutors, aides, and local experts
*Opportunities for students to provide community services such as surveys, newsletters, plays, and
tutoring
*Opportunities for administrators, teachers, or students to visit managers and company executives
*Involve your local television and radio stations to host school and community forums.
*Have "revolving school/community breakfasts" (community members visit schools for breakfast once or
twice a month, changing the staff and community members each time).
Some of the important questions and issues to discuss in your forums are:
*Review the national goals documents to arrive at a common understanding of each goal.
*What will students be like who learn in schools that achieve the goals?
7 of 14 20
What Does Research Say About Reading? hnp://www.ncrel.orgisdrs/areas/stw_esys/str_read.htm
What are the consequences for our community if we don't achieve them?
*What assumptions are we making about the future in terms of Knowledge, Technology and Science,
Humanities, Family, Change, Population, Minority Groups, Ecology, Jobs, Global Society, Social
Responsibility? Discuss in terms of each of the goal areas.
5. Consider ways to use "Children as Strategic Readers" to promote understanding and commitment from
school staff, parents, and community members for strategic reading.
Vision of Learning
*Curriculum that calls for a diversity of real literature and genre, a repertoire of learning strategies and
organizational patterns for text passages
21
8 of 14
What Doss Research Say About Reading? http://www.ncrel.orgisdrs/areas/stw_esys/str_read.htni
*Collaborative teaching and learning involving student-generated questioning and sustained dialogue
among students and between students and teachers
*Authentic tasks in the classroom such as writing letters, keeping journals, generating plays, author
conferences, genre studies, research groups, sharing expertise, and so on
*Opportunities for students to engage in learning out of school with community members
*Homework that is challenging enough to be interesting but not so difficult as to cause failure
*Rich learning environment with places for children to read and think on their own
Staff Development
*Opportunities for teachers to attend conferences and meetings for reading instruction
*Community members' and parents' participation in reading instruction as experts, aides, guides, tutors
*Active involvement of community members on task forces for curriculum, staff development,
assessment and other areas vital to learning
What Does Research Say About Reading? http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/stw_esys/sts_read.htm
*Opportunities for teachers and other school staff to visit informally with community members to discuss
the life of the school, resources, and greater involvement of the community
*Students at risk integrated into the social and academic life of the school
Teaching Reading: Strategies from Successful Classrooms is a set of six videotapes and
accompanying viewer's guides developed.by the Center for the Study of Reading. Each tape presents
in-depth analyses of successful classrooms. The programs focus on exemplary teachers and students in
order to provide viewers with real access to knowledge about effective reading practices. The aim of the
program is to provide simulated field experiences for use in college-level education courses for preservice
teachers and inservice workshops for practicing teachers. The classrooms featured are:
*The Reading/Writing Connection, Dawn Harris Martine (second), Mahalia Jackson Elementary, Harlem,
NY
*Literacy in Content Area Instruction, Laura Pardo (third), Allen Street Elementary, Lansing, MI
*Fostering a Literate Culture, Kathy Johnson (third), East Park Elementary, Danville, IL
*Teaching Reading Comprehension: Experience and Text, Joyce Ahuna-Ka'ai'ai (third), Kamehameha
Elementary, Honolulu, HI
Center for the Study of Reading, 51 Gerty Drive, Champaign, EL 61820 (217/333-2552)
23
10 of 14
What Dobs Research Say About Reading? http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/stw esysisir read.litm
Rural Wisconsin Reading Project (RWRP) was a three-year project developed by NCREL, the
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, and the Wisconsin Educational Communications Board that
provided technology-supported staff development on strategic reading and teaching for 17 rural districts
in central and west-central Wisconsin. The project's approach to develop strategic reading instruction was
to treat human and organizational change as a long-term, evolutionary process rather than as a process of
implementing an innovation. Two programs have arisen out of RWRP: (1) The Rural Schools Reading
Project which applies what was learned from RWRP to address the access, time, and cost challenges of
sustained, effective staff development for a network of rural schools (this project is on the list of
programs that work from the National Diffusion Network of the U.S. Department of Education), and (2)
The Strategic Reading project which is a single school application of the RWRP principles. NCREL,
1900 Spring Road, Oak Brook, IL 60521 (708/571-4700)
Reciprocal Teaching is an instructional strategy for teaching strategic reading developed by Annemarie
Sullivan Palincsar that takes place in the form of a dialogue between teachers and students. In this
dialogue the teacher and students take turns assuming the role of teacher in leading the dialogue about a
passage of text. Four strategies are used by the group members in the dialogue: summarizing, question
generating, clarifying, and predicting. At the start the adult teacher is principally responsible for initiating
and sustaining the dialogue through modelling and thinking out loud. As students acquire more practice
with the dialogue, the teacher consciously imparts responsibility for the dialogue to the students, while
becoming a coach to provide evaluative information and to prompt for more and higher levels of
participation. Annemarie Palincsar, 1360 FEB, University of Michigan, 610 East University, Ann Arbor.
MI 48109.
*******************************************************
GLOSSARY
Coaching Providing support in studying new skills, polishing old ones, and encouraging change.
Collaborative Groups A temporary grouping structure used primarily for developing attitude outcomes.
Students of varying abilities work together to solve a problem or to complete a project.
Comprehension Monitoring Good comprehenders self-evaluate how well they understand while they
read. If comprehension is not proceeding well, they have strategies for going back and improving their
comprehension.
Constructing Meaning from Text A process in which the reader integrates what is read with his or her
prior knowledge.
Cooperative Learning Students working together in small heterogeneous groups to achieve a common
goal.
Heterogeneous Groups Groups composed of students who vary in several ways (for example, different
reading levels).
Homogeneous Groups Groups composed of students who are alike in one or more ways.
24
11 of 14
What Does Research Say About Reading? http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/stw_esys/stf_read.htm
Interactive Phase Sometimes called "guided practice" in this phase, the teacher attempts gradually to
move students to a point where they can independently use strategies. It is a major part of a lesson.
Metacognition The process of thinking about and regulating one's own learning. Examples of
metacognitive activities include assessing what one already knows about a given topic before reading,
assessing the nature of the learning task, planning specific reading/thinking strategies, determining what
needs to be learned, assessing what is comprehended or not comprehended during reading, thinking about
what is important and unimportant, evaluating the effectiveness of the reading/thinking strategy, revising
what is known, and revising the strategy.
Modeling Showing a student how to do a task with the expectation that the student will then emulate the
model. In reading, modeling often involves talking about how one thinks through a task.
Prior Knowledge The sum total of what the individual knows at any given point. Prior knowledge
includes knowledge of content as well as knowledge of specific strategies and metacognitive knowledge.
Scaffolding Instruction Providing teacher support to students by modeling the thought processes in a
learning episode and gradually shifting the responsibility for formulating questions and thinking aloud to
the students.
Strategic Learner A learner who analyzes the reading task, establishes a purpose for reading, and then
selects strategies for this purpose.
Strategies Any mental operations that the individual uses, either consciously or unconsciously, to help
him- or herself learn. Strategies are goal oriented; that is, the individual initiates them to learn something,
to solve a problem, to comprehend something. Strategies include, but are not limited to, what have
traditionally been referred to as study skills such as underlining, note taking, and summarizing as well as
predicting, reviewing prior knowledge, and generating questions.
Text Any segment of organized information. Text could be a few sentence or an entire section of a
chapter. Typically, text refers to a few paragraphs.
******.***************************************************
References
Allington, R.L. (1991). How policy and regulation influence instruction for at-risk learners:. Why poor
readers rarely comprehend well and probably never will. In L. Idol, & B.F. Jones (Eds.), Educational
Values and Cognitive Instruction: Implications for Reform (pp. 273-296). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Anderson, R.C., Osborn, J., & Tierney, R.J. (Eds.). (1984). Learning to read in American schools: Basal
readers and content texts. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Anderson, R.C., Spiro, R.J., & Montague, W.E. (Eds.). (1977). Schooling and the acquisition of
knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25
12 of 14
What Does Research Say About Reading? http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/stw_esys/str_read.htill
Anderson, R.C., Hiebert, E.H., Scott, J.A., & Wilkinson, I.A.G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers:
The report of the Commission on Reading. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
Banathy, B.H. (1990). Systems design of education: A journey to create the future. Englewood Cliffs,
NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Borkowski, J.G., Can, M., Rellinger, E., & Pressley, M. (1990). Self-regulated cognition:
Interdependence of metacognition, attributions, and self-esteem. In B.F. Jones (Ed.), Dimensions of
thinking: Review of research (pp.53-92). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brown, A.L., Palincsar, A.S., & Purcell, L. (1986). Poor readers: Teach, don't label. In U. Neisser (Ed.),
The academic performance.of minority children: New perspectives (pp. 105-143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching students the craft of
reading, writing, and mathematics. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in
honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Durkin, D. (1984). Do basal manuals teach reading comprehension? In R.C. Anderson, J. Osborn, & J.
Tierney (Eds.), Learning to read in American schools: Basal readers and content texts (pp. 39-38).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Durkin, D. (1978-79). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction.
Reading Research Quarterly,15, 481-533.
Herber, H.L. (1985). Developing reading and thinking skills in content areas. In J.W. Segal, S.F.
Chipman, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Vol. I. Relating instruction to research (pp.
297-316). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jones, B.F., Palincsar, A.S., Ogle, D.S., & Can-, E.G. (1987). Strategic teaching and learning: Cognitive
instruction in the content areas. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum
Development.
Jones, B.F. & Pierce, J. (in press). Students at risk vs the Board of Education. In A. Costa & J. Bell
(Eds.), Mind Matters: Vol. I. Educating for the 21st century. Palatine, IL: Skylight Publishing.
Palincsar, A. (1987, April). Collaborating for collaborative learning of text comprehension. Paper
presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
Paris, S.G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction.
In B.F. Jones, & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15-52). Hillsdale,
NJ: Erlbaum.
26
13 of 14
What Does Research Say About Reading? http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/stw_esys/stf_read.htm
Pressley, M., Borkowski, J.G., & Schneider, W. (1987). Good strategy users coordinate metacognition,
strategy use and knowledge. In R. Basta & G. Whitehurst (Eds.), Annals of Child Development, 4,
89-129.
Resnick, L.B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13-20.
Strickland, D.S. (1987). Using computers in the teaching of reading. New York: Teachers College Press.
Tierney, R.J., & Cunningham, J.W. (1984). Research on teaching reading comprehension. In P.D.
Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 609-656). New York: Longman.
Weinstein, C.E., Goetz, E., & Alexander, P. (1988). Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment,
instruction, and evaluation. New York: Academic Press.
Wiggins, G. (1989).'A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 70,
703-714.
27
14 of 14
1 A
Principle 1: Learning is the process of making personal sense of the Teaching and
world. (R. Sinatra, D.Ogle) Learning
K-12
Discussion: Four principles derived from the constructivist philosophy
explain how learners make sense of the world: (1) knowledge is made Constructivism
up of past constructions as learners interact with the environment;
(2) construction of meaning occurs through assimilation and
accommodation; (3) learning is an organic process of inventing instead
of accumulating information; and (4) meaningful learning occurs through
(4.t
0 reflection and resolution of cognitive conflict (Fosnot 1989). AZ=1
Learning begins when we have questions, experience ambiguity, and 611-84340
have a need to know. The desire to make sense of the world is inherent in 611-93148
0 humans from birth. Infants take in sensory data and try to give it meaning. 511-04192
They test their hypotheses and from the feedback they receive either 611-91112
0 confirm or modify their growing understanding. Because children do not
E have the same field of knowledge or experiences adults have, their
meanings are different. Studies of early language acquisition make clear
that children do not memorize and copy adult language but construct their
own. For example, no matter how carefully parents model the sentence,
"0 "Mommy's going to school," children begin with the one-word
co
"Mommygo" phrase to communicate. This innate drive to order and AZ=I
0 construct a meaningful system for language has been studied in children
around the world. These studies have proven that children do not simply 2-94145
612-92020
a mimic adult language models, they construct their own and then modify
612-92120
U) them as they discover variances from adult speech (R. Brown 1973,
0 C. Chomsky 1969).
0 Reading and writing are the basic processes of literacy by which Comprehension
ca learners actively construct meaning to establish relevant connections in
0
0 text. Reading involves a transaction between the reader and a text during
MC°
which the reader creates purposeful meanings (McNeil 1987, Irwin 1991).
0 Comprehension may be regarded as the process of integrating a reader's
0 prior experience with a writer's cues to construct meaning useful to the
CI)
reader in that specific context (Irwin 1991).
Reading ability develops through extensive reading for a variety of Ability
individual purposes (R. Anderson et al. 1985 ). Children who read for
meaning monitor their achievement and gain control over the process over
time. At all levels, children build interpretations of what they read. It is
important to encourage and support students' own personal responses and
interpretations of their reading so they can increase the sophistication of
their literary responses (Applebee, Lanzer, and Mullis 1986).
When learners write, they integrate ideas with their prior experiences to Writing/Thinking
construct and communicate messages for readers. Writing is an active
process of creating meaning, a way of elaborating ideas so that they can be
better retained and comprehended, and a way of learning and clarifying
thought (McNeil 1987). Because reading and writing are so deeply
connected, learners need appropriate writing tasks to increase their
References
Anderson, R.C., E. Heibert, J. Scott, and I. Wilerson. (1985). Becoming a Nation of Readers: The
Report of the Commission on Reading. Newark, Del.: International Reading Association.
Applebee, A., J.A. Lanzer, and I.V. Mullis. (1986). The Writing Report Card. Princeton, NJ.: The
National Assessment of Educational Progress at Educational Testing Service.
Boyer, E.L. (1985). "Art as Language: Its Place in the Schools." In Beyond Creating: The Place for
Art in America's Schools, edited by the Getty Center for Education in the Arts. Los Angeles,
Calif.: The J. Paul Getty Trust.
Boyer, E.L. (1991). "Introduction: Giving Dignity to the Teaching Profession." In What Teachers Need
to Know, edited by D.D. Dill and Associate. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass.
Broudy, H.D. (1987). 'The Role of Imagery in Learning." Occasional Paper 1, The Getty Center for
Education in the Arts. Los Angeles, Calif.: The J. Paul Getty Trust.
Brown, R. (1973). A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Calkins, L.M. (1983). Lessons from a Child: On the Teaching and Learning of Writing. Exeter,
N.H.,: Heniemann.
Chomsky, C. (1969). The Acquisition of Syntax in Children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT
Press.
Fosnot, C.T. (1989). Enquiring Teachers, Enquiring Learners: A Constructivist Approach to
Teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
Graves, D. (1983). Writing: Teachers and Children at Work Exeter, N.H. Heinemann.
Henderson, E.H., and J. Beers, eds. (1980). Developmental and Cognitive Aspects of Learning to
Spell. Newark, Del.: International Reading Association.
Irwin, J.I. (1991). Teaching Reading Comprehension Processes 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.:
Prentice Hall.
Lloyd-Jones, R. (1991). "What Teachers Need to Know About English." In What Teachers Need to
Know, edited by D.D. Dill and Associate. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass.
McNeil, J.D. (1987). Reading Comprehension: New Directions for Classroom Practice, 2nd ed.
Glenview, Scott, Foresman, and Co.
30
II
Social Context The social context for writing is also influenced by what parents do in
the home setting. Children are often not only encouraged to write but the
forms and functions of writing are modeled (Heller 1991). Literacy events
such as making lists and writing home messages emerge from daily
encounters with print and often involve the four literacy processes of
listening, speaking, reading, and writing. The use of print for play and
practical purposes has been described as "natural, pleasurable, and highly
practical" (Piazza and Tomlinson 1985). Such interaction and social literacy
events are necessary ingredients of successful reading and writing growth
for children (Teale 1982).
Social and situational contexts, therefore, have been regarded as the
most influential for successful learning. Au and Mason (1983) found that
comprehension difficulties for children of Polynesian-Hawaiian ancestry
were not due to the text but due to the situational and cultural contexts.
While reading researchers tend to define reading comprehension in terms of
task, text, and subject contexts, the single most important context for
classroom reading comprehension may be the interaction between students
and teachers (Mosenthal 1984).
References
Anderson, R.C., E.H. Hiebert, J.A. Scott, and I.A.G. Wilkinson. (1984). Becoming a Nation of
Readers: The Report of the Commission on Reading. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of
Education.
Au, K.H., and J.M. Mason. (1983). "Cultural Congruence in Classroom Participation Structures:
Achieving a Balance of Rights." Discourse Processes 6, 2: 145-167.
Bloome, D. (1985). "Reading as a Social Process." Language Arts 62, 2: 134-142.
Durkin, D. (1966). Children Who Read Early: Two Longitudinal Studies. New York: Teachers
College Press.
Elley, W.B. (1989). "Vocabulary Acquisition from Listening to Stories.Reading Research Quarterly
24: 174-187.
Heath, S.B. (1982). "What No Bedtime Story Means: Narrative Skills at Home and School. Language
in Society 11, 1:49 -76.
Heller, M.F. (1991). Reading-Writing Connections: From Theory to Practice. New York: Longman.
Irwin, J.I. (1991). Teaching Reading Comprehension Processes. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:
Prentice Hall.
Mason, J.M., and K.H. Au. (1990). Reading instruction for Today, 2nd edition. Harper Collins.
McNeil, J.D. (1987). Reading Comprehension: New Direction for Classroom Practice 2nd ed.
Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman, and Co.
Morrow, L.M. (1988). "Young Children's Responses to One-to-One Story Readings in School Settings."
Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 1: 89-107.
Mosenthal, P. (1984). "Reading Comprehension Research from a Classroom Perspective." In Promoting
Reading Comprehension, edited by J. Flood. Newark, Del.: International Reading Association.
Piazza, C.L., and C.M. Tomlinson. (1985). "A Concert of Writers." Language Arts 62, 2: 150-158.
Pontecorvo, C., and C. Zucchermaglio. (1990). "A Passage to Literacy: Learning in a Social Context. In
How Children Construct Literacy: Piagetian Perspectives, edited by Y.M. Goodman. Newark,
Del.: International Reading Association.
Smith, S.L., R. Carey, and J.C. Harste. (1982). "The Contexts of Reading." In Secondary School
Reading: What Research Reveals for Classroom Practice, edited by A. Berger and H.A.
Robinson. Urbana, 111.: National Conference on Research in English and ERIC Clearinghouse on
Reading and Communication Skills.
Taylor, D. (1983). Family Literacy: Young Children Learning to Read and Write. Portsmouth, N.H.:
Heinemann.
Teale, W.H. (1982). "Toward a Theory of How Children Learn to Read and Write Naturally." Language
Arts 59, 6: 555-570.
Teale, W.H. (1984). "Reading to Young Children: Its Significance for Literacy Development." In
Awakening to Literacy, edited by H. Goelman, A. Oberg, and F. Smith. Portsmouth, N.H.:
Heinemann.
ASCD 1994
33 3.39
References
Barron, M. (1990). "Whole Language: Learning the Natural Way." Holistic Education Review 3, 4:
3-11.
Bishop, W. (1990). Released into Language. Urbana, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English.
Creber. (1990). Sense and Sensitivity. Exeter, U.K.: University Curriculum Center.
Donaldson, M. (1978). Children's Minds. New York: Norton.
Gardner, H. (1982). Art, Mind, and Brain. New York: Basic Books.
Goodman, Y. and S. Wilde (1992). Literacy Events in a Community of Young Writers. Portsmouth,
NH: Heinemann.
Hampden-Turner, C. (1981). Maps of the Mind. New York: Collier-Macmillan.
Kirby, D., and C. Kuykendall. (1991). Mind Matters: Teaching for Thinking. Exeter, N.H.:
Heinemann/Boynton -Cook.
Kohl, H. (1982). Basic Skills. Boston: Little, Brown.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and Practices in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford, U.K.:
Pergamon.
Nelms, B.F. (1991). "Editorial: The Whole Language." English Journal 80, 2: 98-99.
Piper, T. (1993). And Then There Were Thvo: Children and Second Language Learning. Portsmouth,
NH: Heinemann.
Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Strickland, K. (1991). "Toward a New Philosophy of Language Teaching." English Leadership
Quarterly 13, 1: 2-4.
Summary: Specific language skills are best learned when they are
integrated into the elaboration or understanding of content-based units so
that students perceive that specific skill instruction would increase their
ability to communicate.
References
Baumann, J.F. (1991). "Editorial Comments: Of Rats and Pigeons: Skills and WholeLanguage."
Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 12, 1: iii-xii.
Irwin, J.F. (1991). Teaching Reading Comprehension Processes, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:
Prentice Hall.
Rosenshine, B. (1980). "Skill Hierarchies in Reading Comprehension." In Theoretical Issues in
Reading Comprehension, edited by R.J. Spiro, B.C. Bruce, and W. F. Brewer. Hillsdale, N.J.:
Lawrence Erlbaum.
Walmsley, S., and T. Walp. (January 1990). "Integrating Literature and Composing into the Language
Arts Curriculum: Philosophy and Proctice." Elementary School Journal 90, 3: 251-274.
Weaver, C. (1994). Reading Process and Practice. 2nd ed. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
36
3.42 © ASCD 1994
Language Arts Principles
Resources
Applebee, A. (1978). The Child's Concept of Story. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bissex, G.L. (1980). NYS AT WORK: A Child Learns to Write and Read Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard
University Press.
Clay, M.M. (1972). Reading: The Patterning of Complex Behaviour. Auckland: Heinemann.
Dyson, A.H. (1985). "Individual Differences in Emerging Writing." In Advances in Writing Research:
Volume 1. Children's Early literacy Development, edited by M. Fair. Norwood, NJ.: Ablex.
Langer, J. (1984). "The Effects of Available Information on Responses to School Writing Tasks.
Research in the Teaching of English 18, 1: 27-44.
Piaget, J. (1969). The Mechanisms of Perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Sulzby, E. (1985). "Kindergartners as Writers and Readers." In Advances in Writing Research: Volume
1, edited by M. Fart Norwood, NJ.: Ablex.
38
Principle 6: Language proficiency occurs through frequent and diverse Teaching and
practice in purposeful, functional settings. (L. Sande!) Learning
Discussion: Implicit in the practice principle is a provision for multiple
K-12
ways through which the learner applies learnings in interpreting and Authentic
communicating meaning through impressive (listening and reading) and Practice
expressive (speaking and writing) language. The learner constructs meaning
to communicate through speaking and writing, aware of the purpose of the
message and the receptive characteristics and needs of the audience. The
learner constructs meaning as a receiver to derive the sender's meaning in
listening and reading. The processes of reading and writing unfold in
similar ways and tend to be used together. For example, a person receives a
lettervia postal service or electronic mailreads it, then answers it in Authentic Assessment
writing, perhaps rereading portions of the letter while constructing the (808) 533-6000
response. When reading and writing are taught together, the benefits are
greater than when they are taught separately (Tierney and Shannahan,
1991). Because purpose, prior knowledge, and experience are integral to a
reading or listening experience, learners need diverse opportunities to use AI=
language in many contexts. 1-94049
Through the actualization of language, the learner uses language in 611-93018
such various activities as using computers, reading content area texts,
preparing or following directions, interpreting dialogue in print, and using
symbolic language in reading or creating graphics. Reading informational
text is different from reading literature such as fiction or poetry. Teachers AZCD
honor the difference between informational text (factual, serving a specific 2-94151
purpose) and literature (aesthetic, intriguing plot, emotion-evoking 612-93067
description) when students read a selection of fiction or poetry without
searching for facts (De Groff and Golda 1992). Non-verbal language (body
movement; nature signs of weather, seasons, and plants) as a means of
communicating meaning is worthy of attention in building a conceptual
framework for symbolic language in print (math, science).
To stimulate productive thinking, speaking, and writing as well as
reflective listening, Goodman et al. (1989) suggest an "open inquiry"
method. Because students go through stages in understanding a happening
or event, teaching strategies should encourage the expansion of a learner's
language and thinking. This construction of phases of student experience,
identified as perceiving, ideating, and presenting, and appropriate teaching
strategies of confronting, dialoguing, and rehearsing are, in essence, the
framework for creating multiple ways of providing practice in learning.
Oral language activities in communication and learning should involve Interpretation
the student in interpreting the information in some way, not merely
remembering and recalling it (Fisher 1990). Students' discussion in
classroom is important to their learning. Research shows that students'
verbal exchanges about content improve learning and increase their level of
thinking (Marzano 1991). Scrutiny of children's talk reveals their natural
ability to think about difficult ideas through metaphoric and analogic
language: long narratives that use a story to explicate a difficult idea, or
40
3.46 © ASCD 1994
Language Arts Principles
References
Cintorino. M.A. (1993). "Getting Together, Getting Along, Getting to the Business of Teaching and
Learning." English Journal 82, 1: 23-32.
De Groff, L. and L. Golda. (1992). "Responding to Literature: Activities for Exploring Books." In B.E.
Cullinan (ed.) Invitations to Read: More Children Literature in the Reading Program.
Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Dyson, A.H. (1993). "From Prop to Mediator. The Changing Role of Written Language in Children's
Symbolic Repertoires." In Language and Literacy in Early Childhood Education. New York:
Teachers College Press.
Fisher, CJ., and C.A. Terry. (1990). Children's Language and the Language Arts (3rd ed.) Needham
Heights, Mass.: Allyn & Bacon.
Fulwiler, T. (1987). The. Journal Book. Portsmouth, N.H.: Boynton/Cook, Heinemann Educational
Books.
Gallas, K. (1994). The Languages of Learning: How Children Talk, Write, Dance, Draw, and Sing
Their Understanding of the World. New York: Teachers College Press.
Goodman, K., E.B. Smith, E. Merideth, and Y.M. Goodman. (1989). Language and Thinking in School
(3rd ed.). New York: Richard C. Owen Publishers, Inc.
McCaslin, N. (1990). Creative Drama in the Classroom (5th ed). New York: Longman.
Martinez, M.G. and N.L. Rosen (1991). "Children's Responses to Literature." In J. Flood, J.M. Jensen,
D. Lapp, J. Squire (eds.), Handbook of Research in the English Language Arts: 643-663. New
York: MacMillan.
Marzano, RJ. (1991). "The Language Arts and Thinking." In J. Flood, J.M. Jensen, D. Lapp, J. Squire
(eds.), Handbook of Research in the English Language Arts: 559-586. New York: MacMillan.
Morrow, 0.M., O'Connor, E.M. and J. Smith. (1990). "Effects of a Story Reading Program on the
Literacy Development of At-Risk Kindergarten Children." Journal of Reading Behavior; 20, 2:
104-141.
Sheppard, R. (1985). Enhancing Learning Through Oral and Written Expression: Strategies for
Subject Area Teachers. Columbus, Ohio: The National Middle School Association.
Routman, R. (1993). "The Uses and Abuses of Invented Spelling." instructor; 102, 9: 36-39.
Spodek, B. and O.N. Saracho. (1993). Language and Literacy in Early Childhood Education. New
York: Teachers College Press.
Stice, C.F. and N.P. Bertrand. (1990). Whole Language and the Emergent Literacy of At-Risk
Children: A Tivo-Year Comparative Study. Tennessee State University.
Thais, C. (1986). Language Across the Curriculum in the Elementary Grades. Urbana, Ill.: National
Council of Teachers of English.
Tierney, RJ. and T. Channahan. (1991). "Research on the Reading-Writing Relationship: Interactions,
Transactions and Outcomes." In R. Barr, M.I. ICamil, P. Mosenthal, and P.D. Pearson (eds.)
Handbook of Reading Research 2: 246-280. New York: Longman.
Winn, M. (1977). The Plug-in Drug. New York: Viking.
3.48
42 © ASCD 1994
Language Arts Principles
3.49
0 ASCD 1994
43
Language Arts Principles
References
Dixon, J. (1976). Growth Through English. Urbana, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English and
London, UK: National Association for the Teaching of English.
Elbow, P. (1990). What is English? New York: Modem Language Association.
Goodman, K. (1986). What's Whole in Whole Language? Toronto and New York: Scholastic.
Lloyd-Jones, R., and A. Lunsford, eds. (1989). The English Coalition Conference: Democracy
Through Language. Urbana, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English.
Moffett, J. (1983). Teaching the Universe of Discourse. Exeter, N.H.: Heinemann/Boynton -Cook.
Monson, R.J., and M.M. Pahl. (1991). "Charting a New Course with Whole Language." Educational
Leadership 48, 6: 51-54.
Purves, A., T. Rogers, and A. Soter. (1990). How Porcupines Make Love ii: Noteson a Response
Centered Curriculum. White Plains, N.Y.: Longman.
Somerfield, M., M. Torbe, and C. Ward. (1986). A Framework for Reading. Exeter, N.H.: Heinemann.
Tchudi, S., (1991). The English Teacher's Handbook 2nd ed. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton Cook.
Weaver, C. (1990). Understanding Whole Language. Exeter, N.H.: Heinemann.
44
3.50 © ASCD 1994
Language Arts Principles
Principle 8: The most effective way to increase learning, particularly Teaching and
language learning, is to integrate concepts and disciplines. (D. Ogle) Learning
K-12
Discussion: Children are constantly trying to make sense of their
environments and to communicate. For them to do this successfully they Curriculum
need to be in rich contexts where language is in abundance and where they Integration
can experiment and receive helpful feedback. Interdisciplinarity
Studies of how children acquire language have confirmed the active,
constructive nature of language learning. Children do not mimic adult
language patterns as they begin to talk but rather try to make sense of the
oral patterns they hear by constructing their own systems of language AZ=
(Klima and Bellugi-Klima 1966). Recent research on how children learn to
612-91065
write and spell reveal similar constructive processesrather than memorize 612-91090
the standard spellings they see in their environment, children engage in 612-93157
active experimentation with orthography as they "invent" spellings. With 612-93158
increasing practice and learning, children's spellings move from primitive 612-93160
to early phonemic to letter naming and finally to transitional and then 612-93162
standard spelling (Temple, Nathan, and Burris 1982; Henderson and Beers
1980). Studies of grammar teaching and learning with older students reveal
similar patterns; direct instruction in rules and isolated aspects of language
is not nearly as likely to lead to students' understanding and correct usage
as are regular meaningful writing experiences (Hillocks 1986).
Research studies have confirmed not only the importance of language Interdisciplinary
exploration but also the way in which the language modes interact as Curriculum
children learn. Early literacy develops as children explore both writing and (717) 948-6404
reading. Eckhoff (1984) showed that the patterns children encounter in
what they read shape their writing. Many studies have shown that children
who listen to parents read to them become interested in written language
and discover the patterns independently (Ferreiro and Teberosky 1982,
Sulzby 1985, Tea le 1982). Children who read widely are most likely to
AZ=
develop good vocabularies (Wilson et al. 1986). Shanahan (1984) also 611-89156
found that in the early grades reading and writing skills were highly 511-04192
correlated. Studies of more mature writers have demonstrated that they 611-93018
need to constantly reread what they have written to make sense of it; this 611-91117
611-92151
has been termed "becoming one's own reader" (Tierney and Pearson 1983).
Older children profit as writers when they read widelyand expert writers
are useful guides for novices (Stewig 1980). O);
Research in language development, both oral and written, makes a
strong case for integrated instruction. Children need to be immersed in AM=
meaningful experiences so that they want to use language to communicate 614-248
and they must be given regular opportunities to experiment with a variety
of forms of language expression. They need to be allowed to take risks and
explore; and they need to be given guidance and feedback. Situations that
stimulate children to want to engage in communication are generally those
that are rich in meaning and purpose. Therefore, teachers need to be
encouraged to create larger, meaningful experiences and units of instruction
45
. . a
46
3.52 © ASCD 1994
Language Arts Principles
References
Camboume, B. (1988). The Whole Story: Natural Learning and the Acquisition of Literacy in the
Classroom. New York: Ashton Scholastic.
Eckhoff, B. (1984). "How Reading Affects Children's Writing." In Composing and Comprehending,
edited by J.M. Jensen. Urbana, Ill.: ERIC/RCS.
Ferreiro, E., and A. Teberosky. (1982). Literacy Before Schooling. Exeter, N.H.: Heinemann.
Henderson, E.H., and J. Beers. (1980) Developmental and Cognitive Aspects of Learning to Spell.
Newark, Del.: International Reading Association.
Hillocks, G., Jr. (1986). Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching. Urbana,
Ill.: NCTFJNCRE
Klima, E.S., and U. Bellugi-Klima. (1966). "Syntactic Regularities in the Speech of Children." In
Psycholinguistics Papers, edited by J. Lyons and R. J. Wales. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University
Press.
Lytle, S., and M. Botel. (1989). PCRP II: Reading, Writing and Talking Across the Curriculum.
Harrisburg, Pa.: Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Noyce, R. M., and J. Christie. (1989). Integrating Reading and Writing Instruction in Grades K-8.
Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Shanahan, T. (1984). "The Nature of the Reading/Writing Relation: An Exploratory Multivariate
Analysis." Journal of Educational Psychology 76, 466-477.
Stewig, J. (1980). Read to Write: Using Children's Literature as a Springboard to Writing. New
York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Sulzby, E. (1985). "Kindergartners as Writers and Readers." In Advances in Writing Research: Volume
1, edited by M. Fan. Norwood, NJ.: Ablex.
Teale, W. H. (1982) "Toward A Theory of How Children Learn to Read and Write Naturally." Language
Arts 59, 6: 555-570.
Temple, C., R.G. Nathan, and N.A. Burris. (1982). The Beginnings of Writing. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Tierney, R.J., and P.D. Pearson. (1983). "Toward a Composing Model of Reading." Language Arts 60,
5: 568-580.
Wilson, P., R. Anderson, and L. Fielding. (1986). Children's Book Reading Habits: A New Criterion
for Literacy. Cambridge, Mass.: Bolt, Beranek, Newman.
47
©ASCD 1994 3.53
Language Arts Principles
Other Resources
Duffy, G.G., L.R. Roehler, and J. Mason. (1984). Comprehension Instruction: Perspectives and
Suggestions. New York: Longman.
Flood, J., and D. Lapp. (1991). "Reading Comprehension Instruction." In Handbook of Research on
Teaching the English Language Arts, edited by J. Flood, J. Jensen, D. Lapp, and J. Squire.
New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Nelson-Herber, J. (1985). "Anticipation and Prediction in Reading Comprehension". In Reading,
Thinking, and Concept Development, edited by T.L. Harris and E. Cooper. New York:
College Entrance Examination Board.
Siegler, R.S., ed. (1978). Children 's Thinking: What Develops? Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Tuma, D.T., and F. Reif, eds. (1980). Problem Solving and Education: Issues in Teaching and
Research. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum
0 ASCD 1994
4. 3.55
Language Arts Principles
Principle 10: From the time a child is born, learning is dependent on Teaching and
feedback. (R. Farr) Learning
K-12
Discussion: Children are constantly shaping their language development
based on the feedback they receive from others. Parents reinforce some Diagnostic
language patterns and attempt to extinguish others. Assessment
Feedback for and about students can be gathered in a variety of ways
including, but not limited to, norm-referenced tests, performance
assessments, student-work samples collected in portfolios, interviews,
self-report analyses, and classroom observations. In addition to providing
feedback to students, educators also need feedback about students' progress 4.41S=
and development if they are to plan effective and timely instruction. It is 611-87012
vital that the feedback about students' language learning that educators 611-93018
receive is congruent with the feedback provided to the students. If the 611-89010
information provided to teachers and administrators is different from that
provided to learners, it is unlikely that effective instruction will take place.
Therefore, feedback to students, teachers, and administrators must be
based on both formal and informal assessment that is valid, reliable, AZ=
efficient, and authentic. Such assessment must be based on the following 614-106
criteria: 614-225
Assessment should provide students, teachers, and administrators
with congruent information about students' language development,
even though the information may be summarized in different ways
for each group.
Assessment should be based on multiple samples of language 612-92026
behaviors, gathered over a period of time, and performed under a 612-92086
variety of conditions. Single sample assessments are not valid for
planning language instruction.
Assessment should include opportunities for students to self-reflect,
should encourage student/teacher conferences, and should be based,
at least in part, on student selection of what is to be assessed.
Other Resources
Farr, R., and M. Beck. "Formal Methods of Evaluation." (1991). In Handbook of Research on
Teaching the English Language Arts, edited by J. Flood, J. Jensen, D. Lapp, and J. Squire. New
York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Gagne, R.M. (1974). Essentials of Learning for Instruction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Goodman, Y.M. (1991). "Informal Methods of Evaluation." In Handbook of Research on Teaching the
English Language Arts, edited by J. Flood, J. Jensen, D. Lapp, and J. Squire. New York:
Macmillan Publishing Company.
O'Flahavan, J.F., D.K. Hartman, and P.D. Pearson. (1988). "Teacher Questioning and Feedback
Practices: A Twenty Year Retrospective." In Dialogues in Literacy Research, edited by J.E.
Readence and R. S. Baldwin. Chicago, Ill.: National Reading Conference, Inc.
50
The more elements of good parenting, good teaching, and good schooling that children
experience, the greater the likelihood that they will achieve their potential as readers. The
following recommendations encapsulate the information presented in this report about the
conditions likely to produce citizens who read with high levels of skill and do so frequently
with evident satisfaction.
Parents should read to preschool children and informally teach them about reading and
writing. Reading to children, discussing stories and experiences with them, and with a light
touch - helping them learn letters and words are practices that are consistently associated with
eventual success in reading.
Preschool and kindergarten reading readiness programs should focus on reading, writing,
and oral language. Knowledge of letters and their sounds, words, stories, and question
asking and answering are related to learning to read, but there is little evidence that such
activities as coloring, cutting with a scissors, or discriminating shapes (except the shapes of
letters) promote reading development.
Teachers should maintain classrooms that are both stimulating and disciplined. Effective
teachers of reading create a literate classroom environment. They allocate an adequate amount
of time to reading and writing, sustain children's attention, maintain a brisk pace, and keep
rates of success high.
Children should spend less time completing work. books and skill sheets. Workbook and
skill sheet activities consume a large proportion of the time allocated to reading instruction in
most American classrooms, despite the fact that there is little evidence that these activities are
related to reading achievement. Workbook and skill sheet activities should be pared to the
minimum that actually provide worthwhile practice in aspects of reading.
Children should spend more time in independent reading. Independent reading, whether in
school or out of school, is associated with gains in reading achievement. By the time they are
in the third or fourth grade, children should read independently a minimum of two hours per
week. Children's reading should include classic and modern works of fiction and nonfiction
that represent the core of our cultural heritage.
Children should spend more time writing. Opportunities to write more than a sentence or
two are infrequent in most American elementary school classrooms. As well as being valuable
in its own right, writing promotes ability in reading.
Schools should cultivate an ethos that supports reading. Schools that are effective in
teaching reading are characterized by vigorous leadership, high expectations, an emphasis on
academic learning, order and discipline, uninterrupted time for learning, and staffs that work
together.
Schools should maintain well-stocked and managed libraries. Access to interesting and
informative books is one of the keys to a successful reading program. As important as an
52
Becoming a Nation of Readers: Recommendations 2
adequate collection of books is a librarian who encourages wide reading and helps match books
to children.
Schools should attract and hold more able teachers. The number of able people who
choose teaching as a profession has declined in recent years. Reversing this trend requires
higher admissions standards for teacher education programs, stronger standards for teacher
certification, improved working conditions, and higher teachers' salaries.
Schools should provide for the continuing professional development of teachers. Schools
should have programs to ease the transition of novice teachers into the profession and
programs to keep veteran teachers abreast of advancing knowledge.
America will become a nation of readers when verified practices of the best teachers in
the best schools can be introduced throughout the country.
Fulfilling a need for careful and thorough synthesis of an extensive body of findings on reading, this
report presents leading experts' interpretations of both current knowledge of reading and the state of the
art and practice of teaching reading. The introduction contains two claims:
(1) the knowledge is now available to make worthwhile improvements in reading throughout
the United States
(2) if the practices seen in the classrooms of the best teachers in the best schools could be
introduced everywhere, improvement in reading would be dramatic.
The first chapter of the report stresses reading as the process of constructing meaning from written texts,
a complex skill requiring the coordination of a number of interrelated sources of information. The second
chapter, on emerging literacy, argues that reading must be seen as part of a child's general language
development and not as a discrete skill isolated from listening, speaking, and writing. The third chapter,
on extending literacy, stresses that as proficiency develops, reading should not be thought of as a separate
subject, but as integral to learning in all content areas.
The fourth chapter concerns the teacher and the classroom and notes that an indisputable conclusion of
research is that the quality of teaching makes a considerable difference in children's learning. The next
two chapters note that standardized reading tests do not measure everything, and that teaching is a
complex profession. The last chapter contains seventeen recommendations for conditions likely to
produce citizens who would read with high levels of skill and do so frequently with evident satisfaction.
In the afterword, Jeanne Chall comments on the history of the report, and three appendixes contain 260
references and notes plus lists of project consultants and the members of the National Academy of
Education.
1 of 4
ED25:18p5 http://eric-web.tc.columbia.edtilabstracts/ed253865.htm
55
2 of 2
Unlocking the Mysteries, or toward 2001
Interview with Scott G. Paris
Dr. Scott Paris leads the way in the major research developments over the past four years on
strategic reading. His research findings have appeared in Contemporary Educational Psychology,
Child Development and Journal of Educational Psychology. His research findings suggest that
strategies play a significant role in reading comprehension. The Wisconsin State Reading
Association is fortunate to have Dr. Scott Paris add insights to the Fall Journal's theme: The
Strategic Reader.
Recent research has made two important contributions to the instruction of reading and writing
for beginning readers. First, we know that the old notions of readiness are probably incorrect.
Children are ready to read, or at lest engage in literacy, as soon as they can talk. Research studies
have shown that joint book reading between parents and children provides a foundation for
listening and print awareness.
The rich social interaction between parent and child provides an understanding about text as well
as satisfying social experiences revolving around oral language, print, and enjoyable stories.
When parents share literacy with their children, it provides an unshakable foundation for
children's early appreciation of the interest and value of text. By four or five years of age, most
preschoolers are able to identify letters, sounds, words and to produce a combination of writing,
scribbles and drawing that communicates a message.
These early accomplishments indicate cognitive and social awareness about literacy activities and
the nature and convention of print. It helps children to provide these experiences before formal
schooling and to begin reading and writing activities according to the child's interest and
abilities.
The second primary finding from research on beginning reading has shown that early reading
instruction does not have to focus on decoding and phonics alone. Language experience and
whole language approaches that focus on the social and communicative aspects of reading and
writing have had dramatic effects on young children's educational progress.
Research by Don Graves and Jane Hanson, for example, has shown that early writing experiences
increase children's understanding of authorship and promote children's early literacy skills by
combining reading and writing in meaningful activities. Comprehension and production of
meaningful and personally significant text is as much a key to beginning reading as unlocking the
mysteries of letter-sound combinations.
.6
How then, do the research suggestions for teachers in the intermediate grades differ and
yet complement the suggestions for teachers of beginning readers?
Research on reading and writing of older children also emphasizes the value of comprehension
activities for children's development and appreciation of literacy. Instead of workbook exercises
that provide skill and drill practice there is a growing emphasis on promoting children's
understanding of the value of strategic reading. This involved awareness about strategies that
facilitate understanding as well as practice in using these skills n meaningful text.
Durkin's research that illustrated the paucity of comprehension instruction provided in teachers'
lessons or basal materials revealed a glaring weakness in reading instruction for the intermediate
grades. Silent sustained reading and workbook exercises are simply not sufficient activities to
teach all children about the richness of printed language and the strategies that can be used for
composing and comprehending text.
Although the strategies are more sophisticated and are applied to more complex reading
materials, the basic emphasis from beginning to intermediate reading focuses on (a)
understanding the constructive and strategic aspects of reading, (b) engaging in meaningful and
personally relevant tasks of reading and writing, and © working cooperatively with teachers and
peers to construct and comprehend text so that the thinking strategies modeled by others can be
incorporated into self-regulated and independent learning.
Research in the upper grades has focused on more complicated skills such as understanding the
structure of text, composing essays and narratives, and using effective study skills. These aspects
of reading and writing are developmental extensions of the skills and strategies that research has
emphasized at earlier ages. In particular current research is investigating how comprehension of
content area reading can be promoted by making secondary students more analytic and reflective
readers.
The developmental sequence of understanding and strategy use that I have mentioned in these
three questions reflects advances in research on cognitive development that has shown how
children become better able to control their own thinking and reasoning from four to sixteen
years of age. The acquisition of skilled reading and writing during this time period mirrors these
cognitive developmental accomplishments. Indeed, research on topics such as math, science, and
problem solving has shown that some of the same fundamental aspects of planful, thoughtful,
self-regulated learning are important in all of these domains.
If you had the opportunity to teach young children each day for a year, what ideas about
teaching would you engage your students with daily?
If I thought a classroom of students on a regular basis, I would try to instill in them some
fundamental ideas about learning everyday. First, I would tell my students that I am proud of who
they are and what they know, but that I expect them to learn much more everyday. I believe that
57
it is important for students to realize that teachers respect them, yet hold high expectations for
their development.
Second, I would share with my students the reasons for learning particular information and the
goals that I am trying to accomplish. I believe that it is important that teachers and students
develop a cooperative attitude so that they are aware of the same objectives and try to reach them
together.
Third, each day I would tell my students as much as I could about thinking, learning, and
development so they understand the process of education and schooling that occupies so much of
their lives. Children are curious to know how the mind works and how people develop.
Explaining these phenomena to children is not easy, but it helps make the activities of the
classroom more understandable.
Do you feel there is more to building positive motivation and attitudes among readers than
just developing rapport?
Yes. I believe that motivating students involves more than developing rapport with them.
Friendship is not nearly as important as mutual respect for encouraging and motivating students
to learn. Two concepts--enablement and empowerment--capture what I feel is important about
motivation.
As children learn new skills and strategies for solving the problems we give them in the
classroom, they become enabled to achieve and to excel. They can learn independently and gain
rewards for their accomplishments as they acquire these skills. The skills that enable their
achievement provide a sense of empowerment, because students feel a growing sense of
competence and confidence in themselves. Researchers have referred to this as self-efficacy, and
it is an important component of self-esteem.
I believe that students develop the motivation to persist in the face of frustration when they feel
that they are capable of overcoming difficulties. They develop positive attitudes and high
expectations if people around them communicate an honest and positive set of expectations for
their performance. Students who feel enabled and empowered do not feel threatened or anxious
in the classroom. They take risks and seek challenges so they can learn even more.
On the topic of research and its practical application, do you feel there's more useful
information today about what constitutes effective teaching than ever before?
There is undoubtedly more information on effective teaching today than there ever has been.
Research during the past ten years has been particularly productive in the area of teaching and
learning. There is even a growing field called "instructional psychology" that combines research
in cognitive, developmental, and educational psychology into principles of effective instruction.
I think we are beginning to understand personal dilemmas and frustrations of teachers as well as
the strength and power of effective instruction. Research has analyzed ways in which students
58
and teachers interact in the classroom to determine effective styles of teaching and the particular
qualities of the students and teachers that contribute to effective interaction. Researchers at the
institute for Research on Teaching at Michigan State University, for example, have made great
strides in describing the dynamics of classroom teaching. This body of research is being
translated into preservice and inservice programs of education for teachers that is valuable
immediately.
Yes. I would agree that we have better research today on learning than ever before. Historically,
research on learning followed paradigms from experimental psychology. We stopped using
animal research as our model of learning a long time ago, but we are still moving away from
research on esoteric or non-meaningful tasks.
During the past ten years, researchers have investigated academic learning in classroom settings,
and I believe we have made grate strides in our knowledge about children's learning as a
consequence.
The rise of information proceeding theories have given us new technology and information about
thinking, and the cadre of researchers interested in academic learning has improved dramatically
in numbers and quality. My guess is that some of the great advances in applied psychology
during the next 20 years will be made in our understanding of effective teaching, learning,
instructional technology, and student motivation.
If we believe that reading and writing are fundamental abilities young people should
possess, have we as educators done all we can to bring reading and writing together into
successful classroom lessons?
No. I think educators have been unsuccessful in designing curricula that teach students the
similarities between reading and writing. Some language arts programs and while-language
instruction for beginning readers have combined oral language, listening, reading, and writing in
creative ways: but these seem to fall apart in subsequent grades. Reading and writing become
divorced as the curriculum becomes compartmentalized. By the time students reach secondary
school, they receive little specific instruction on reading and writing but instead use these as tools
of application for learning in other subjects. Students who do not read or write very well by that
time have little hope of gaining the skills that thy have not developed.
There are two ways to solve this problem. First, reading and writing can be combined in every
subject area so that whether students are learning mathematics, biology, or social studies, they
also receive instruction about effective strategies for reading and writing about the content areas.
59
they have ample opportunities to develop reading and writing skills throughout grades K-12.
Some recent reports on public education in America conclude that the institution of public
education in America is in need of a major overhaul. How would you address the needs of
public education in America?
During the past several years, we have seen numerous reports decrying and indicting the state of
education in America. Every level of education from preschool programs to post-secondary
colleges and universities has been reviewed and criticized. Obviously, there is a great deal of
discontent with American education.
But I believe that one of the strengths of American education is cont constant evaluation by the
public and researchers and an enduring dissatisfaction with the quality of instruction and
materials available. As opposed to education in many countries around the world, American
education is constantly scrutinized to revise and improve curricula and instructional approaches. I
believe that such self-examination and revision inevitably leads to improvement and avoids
stagnation. Yet, there are always areas in which progress is slower than we would like to see and
trade-offs are made among recommendations.
I think it is a mistake to jump on the bandwagon of educational criticism. This has become a
political fashion that has created divisive debate. Only in some instances have we used the
national reviews to initiate effective reforms in the curriculum or teacher education. I think
researchers and professional education organizations can combine their energies to focus on
substantive issues that can be addressed concretely. For example, I think we can increase the
effectiveness of the following issues in public education in America:
We can provide students with better educational materials that are based on sound
research rather than marketing techniques.
We can restructure how teachers spend their time so that they engage students
more often in meaningful instruction rather than administrative management and
student counseling.
We can design more effective programs of educational assessment so that the tests
are useful for students, parents, and educators.
I realize that these problems are not small and will not be readily solved. Yet, they each focus on
the dynamics of classroom interactions between teachers and students. I find these problems to
be more easily addressed than far-reaching social issues such as teacher salaries, length of the
school year, and teacher qualifications.
The term metacognition is a buzz word today among educators aware of some of the
60
research being done at our major research institutions. How significant is the concept of
metacognition to the classroom teachers who will be teaching in the year 2000?
Metacognition became a popular term about ten years ago and routinely elicits raised eyebrows
or groans when introduced to parents and teachers. The terminology may sound awkward, but
this focus on understanding our own mental processes is an extremely important topic that will
have far-reaching implications for teaching and learning.
During the past ten years, the benefit of metacognition has been to direct researchers to address
different types of questions involving learning and cognitive development. Researchers have
asked, "How do children become planful, thoughtful, and strategic? How do they learn more
about their own cognitive systems? How do children learn from others the kind of standards to
internalize when they monitor their own behavior? And, how does self-awareness or reflection
get translated into action?"
The basic issue is to understand how children appreciate the way their minds work and how they
use this knowledge to enhance their own academic learning. Research studies have identified a
wide variety of cognitive and instructional principles that depend on metacognition. These will
be incorporated into theories of learning and development in the future and will become part of
the knowledge that teachers acquire.
The more we understand about metacognition, the more we understand the ways students learn.
So, I think it is a very important term for both researchers and educators. The terminology may
change during the next 20 years, but the focus on how people understand and monitor their own
mental processes will be an important issue for years to come.
Dr. Paris was a keynote speaker at the WR\SRA Fall Conference in Green Bay, Wisconsin.
61
Literature and Literacy:
A Review of Research
Wayne Sawyer
In very recent years there has been a great development of interest in the
contribution of literature to reading development. In this paper I would like
to review the major theoretical statements on this connection and the empir-
ical evidence which has been put forward to support the notion of literature's
having an important role in learning to read.
In The Cool Web, Aidan War low (1976) argued that "children will over-
come all sorts of linguistic obstacles . . . if the alternative world of the story
is one that is desirable and comprehensive" (p. 102). Warlow, then, saw the
importance of literature to literacy in what Genette (1980) or Chatman (1978)
would call "Story." The interest of "what happens next" contained in the im-
aginary world of literature provides the drive to read and hence encourages
literacyboth its acquisition and development. On the other hand, Gordon
Wells (1982) has since argued that "hearing stories aloud familiarises [chil-
dren] with the language of books and with the characteristic narrative struc-
tures that they will meet in story books at school" (p. 11). Thus Wells is
describing the learning of "literary literacy," as it were, the acquisition of the
structures of literature itself as a branch of reading. He effectively suggests
that this is gained to an important extent through the learning of what Chat-
man (1978) would call "discourse" or Genette (1980) "narrative."
These are two distinct, but interwoven strands in the research of the con-
nection between literature and literacythe notions of learning to read
through literature and learning to read literature. They are interwoven be-
cause increasingly researchers have been unable to study how and why chil-
dren learn to read through literature without at the same time addressing the
question of how they acquire a competence in dealing with literary structures.
Theoretical Positions
Overwhelmingly, the question of literature's connection to literacy has been
addressed as a question of the role of narrative in reading development, i.e.,
prose literature has been viewed and accepted as a vehicle of narrative. This
seems such an obvious thing to accept and to state, but its implications are to
62 see prose literature as a kind of subbranch of a larger genre (and thus to
BEST COPY AVAILABLE stress its continuity in many respects with oral traditions). Thus the "key-
63
Literature and Literacy: A Review of Research 35
4 Language Arts
and their connections are "story" researchers into the reading process do not dowhat even the psycholinguists
words" in a study of literature and literacy
in the sense espoused by Genette or lack is deep consideration of the quality of the text itself, an answer to the
and "narrative," though not necessarily
Chatman. work in this tradition is The question, "What difference does the kind of story and form of discourse
Probably the most famous, and pioneering, make?" Can basal readers ever possibly teach the same reading lessons as
central theme to be the child's experi- "real" literature, or what the child considers "significant text"?
Cool Web (1977), which declares its
being gained by stories read. The
ence of reading, access to this experience famous definition of narrative as "a pri-
Cool Web highlights Barbara Hardy's Empirical Studies
from art to life" (p. 12). In arguing that we go
mary act of mind transferred she stresses the continuum of narrative
to novels to find out about narrative, Increasingly, such theoretical positions are either being generated from, or
theme in the collection. An-
from artistic fictions to the everyday, a recurrent finding support in, case studies of children learning to read.
is Luria and Chukovsky's notion that Butler's (1979) Cushla was "taught" to read by "the provision of language
other key statement in The Cool Web of the way secondary worlds operate
through stories the child becomes aware and story" (p. 105). In Meek's terms, Cushla could be said to have become a
stories become a vehicle for learning reader by learning "first how a story works," compelled by the drive to an-
according to rules. In other words,
experience, as well as about lan- swer the question "What happens next?"
about the way in which language structures reading lessons.
guage structures themselvesboth very important Scollon and Scollon's (1981) study of their daughter Rachel, though not
the connection between narrative
Possibly the most influential theorist of centrally a study of learning to read, does provide some important relevant
Meek, whose theory is partly implications. Their study of Rachel's orientation to literacy shows her own
and reading development has been Margaret to read. Her theorizing has
generated from empirical observation of learning to read narrative and learn- writing revealing understandings of conventions peculiar to narrative fiction
concerned itself both with the aspects of learning that were derived from hearing stories read: distance between author and
shown the connections between stories text, between author and character, aspects of point of view. Their early read-
ing to read through narrative. She has thus for the notion
heard and stories told in early childhood (1976), arguing ing of stories to her thus provided a general orientation to literary conventions.
structures. She has advocated the teaching of This theme is echoed in the later well-known work of Heath (1982), who
of children's absorbing story let them learn
stories because "it is most natural to stories" again was not centrally concerned with reading development, but who also
reading through reading
drive to cognitive functionby reading suggests ideas about children learning the nature of literary texts from bed-
by means of the imaginative connecting literacy to
(1980, p. 33). The strength of Meek's whole argument literature as an act of trans- time stories.
literature rests precisely
hereif we view reading The Bristol Language Research Programme has included a study of how
experience of the world, of lan-
acting meaning which brings into play our a far differences in early language development account for differences in chil-
and of literature, then reading itself is an organizing of language, sense. dren's success in early schooling. On the three language measuresknowl-
guage rather than Harding's (1937)
spectator role activity in Britton's (1970) form as it were, "function- edge about literacy, oral language, and reading comprehensiononly early
We create meaning through interpreting, imposing experience of listening to stories was significantly associated with later lan-
like
ing cognitively." guage ability and it was associated with all three measures. Wells (1982),
that successful early readers are Heath and the Scollons, speculates on the particular relationship between
In Learning to Read, Meek (1982) argues of the
successful because they discover that stories are like play, not the least language and experience found in stories, arguing that in "listening to stories
rules. Stories are at "the heart of
connections being that both operate with narrative read aloud . . . the child is . . . beginning to gain experience of the sustained
teach the rules of
learning to read" (p. 37) because they themselves meaning-building organization of written language" (p. 5). Thus Wells is de-
increasingly to favor the use of narrative dis- scribing learning to read not only literature but learning to read generally
organization. Meek has come structuralism as one kind of framework for evi-
course theory with its roots in through exposure to Story, as a genre of written language.
mean. Structuralism should It is the drive of Chatman's "Story," Meek's "What happens next?" that
dence on how children learn to make prose
provide such a framework precisely
because it argues that "a theory of liter- enables this to happen. But as I argued in my opening paragraph, Wells has
Children learn to read,
ature is a theory of reading" (Culler 1983, p. 140). find to be significant also effectively described the learning of literary narrative structures (as a
Meek's argument runs, by interaction with "what
they subbranch of written language) through exposure to Story. His is an impor-
D
contribution of structuralist theory could be in consider- tant research study that suggests the interconnection of learning to read lit-
texts" (p. 141). The Importantly, I believe, this is what the
ing what constitutes "significant text." erature and learning to read through literatute.
36 Language Arts 37
Literature and Literacy: A Review of Research
Meek's (1983) own case studies of adolescent readers continually empha-
One next step, of course, would be to use this knowledge in our evaluation
size that a most important reading lesson is the discovery of the relationship
of children's literature. The research shows that the learning of reading com-
between one's own "storying" and the story of the book. What teachers of petencies depends on the kinds of texts to which children are exposed. Meek
these adolescents found to be most valuable was to draw connections between
(1982) has urged in a seminal article that "literature for children may be seen
the student's knowledge of narrative shown in telling stories and their read-
ing. What became significant was not .a book's "readability" in the traditional as the significant model, the cultural paradigm of subsequent literature in the
word-length sense, but its narrative structures in a wider sense: points of experience of the reader. Children's literature is undeniably the first literary
view, secondary worlds, gaps in the text. Meek's team of teachers came to see
experience, where the reader's expectations of what literature is are laid
the whole basis of literacy in "learning literature," in learning the convention down. Books in childhood initiate children into literature; they inaugurate
of written structures. In "learning reading" from basal readersand failing certain kinds of literary competences. . . . They offer a view of what it is to
their students had not learned "how to 'tune' the voice on the page, how to be literate" (p. 19). An approach to children's literature through a study of
narrative structure could at least identify what reading lessons, what lessons
follow the fortunes of the hero, how to tolerate the unexpected, to link epi-
sodes" (p. 214).
about literature and what "competencies" are being taught by the book.
It would seem also that the question of "What happens next?" and its rel-
All of these findings and arguments have recently been echoed by Doch-
erty (1984), May (1984), and Graham (1984), among others.
evance to the drive to read needs to be studied more closely as an issue. In
Recently, another source of evidence has become available in the form of some respects the question "What happens next?" could be seen as the lit-
erary-narrative equivalent of the "getting our predictions answered" of the
studies of young children's own oral stories. Fox (1983, 1985) and Dombey
(1983) have shown their case study children to be using quite complex rules psycholinguists. A narrative-theory approach to children's reading material
could perhaps answer such questions as whether certain structures work more
of narrative production, many echoing structures from stories heard. Both
Fox and Dombey conclude that at school their children will see little connec- on a pattern of generating questions than other structures do.
The final underlying point, of course, is that we cannot any longer separate
tion between reading-scheme stories and their knowledge of more complex
"learning to read" and "reading to learn," as if one necessarily had to pre-
narrative conventions gained from "real" stories. The implications are that
teachers need not choose simple texts nor simplify language for early readers cede the other. In English classrooms in the past this separation manifested
if the story itself is one that the child wants to hear or read. Again, "learning itself as reading lessons (with "exercises") and literature lessons (with literary
criticism); and probably the literature lessons came late in one's schooling ca-
to read must be inextricably tied to what is read" (Fox 1985, p. 380).
Williams and Jack (n.d.) have worked with children regarded as learning reer anyway because one couldn't "do" them until one could "read." We are
disabled on a program of extensive experience in story reading and writing, learning now that important lessons about reading are being taught by the
consciously operating on Hardy's assumption that narrative is a primary way material read so that basal reading schemes are being increasingly questioned
by which people learn to mean. Of most immediate relevance has been the not just for their often misplaced emphasis on phonics but for the paucity of
their narrative structures and story interest. Janet and John's (or Dick and
children's changed views of themselves as readers, and their learning to op-
Jane's or Spot's) adventures are not likely to encourage an interest in reading,
erate more sophisticated conventions of reading. Williams and Jack argue
strongly that a necessary condition of these changes has been the complexity only to allow practice in the most basic mechanical processeswhich could
of the narratives being read. also be done with genuine stories at the same time as these are teaching chil-
dren about written language structures. We can no longer afford to underes-
timate the importance of the role of narrative in reading. Narrative is a
Issues fundamental mode of meaning making through language for humans, and
probably the main mode for children. We cannot present them with reading
All of the research quoted stresses to varying degrees the interactive conti-
nuity between sense-of-narrative-form and the ability to read narrative. One material that is too simplistic in its narrative organization when we know the
complexity of narrative understanding of which children can be capable.
ought to stress that this interaction is complex. There is no suggestion that it
"Reading" ought not to be a school activity while "reading stories" re-
is other than a kind of circularity that includes children's own story making
as well as stories-heard and stories-read interacting in such a way that each mains a home one"reading" cannot be "real work" while reading stories is
element works to produce another. The real importance of the research is in "just fun." Another lesson to learn is to bring into our classrooms those very
66 reminding us that children may bring to their reading a more complex sense activities that the best practices in literature teaching have encouraged (but
of narrative structures than basal reading schemes allow. now as part of simply "reading") and "new model comprehension" activities 67
rich as text senuencine. doze procedure, text prediction, etc. (e.g., Moy and
38 Language Arts
Literature and Literacy: A Review of Research 39
Raleigh 1984). All of these activities are at base a way of teaching children
about their reading processes. "Prolegomena for a Study of Children's Literature." In M. Benton (Ed.),
The war between "top down" and "bottom up" theories of readingbe- Approaches to Research in Children's Literature. Southampton: University of
tween advocates of a psycholinguistic or subskills approach respectively Southampton, 1980.
continues to be waged at the leiel of mechanical process. The important re- Learning to Read. London: The Bodley Head, 1982.
cent research into narrative which I have outlined above promises to open a "What Counts as Evidence in Theories of Children's Literature?" Theory
into Practice. 21:4(1983).
new level of debate and pedagogy in readinga debate about the material M. Meek et al. (Eds.), The Cool Web: The Pattern of Children's Reading. London:
being read as well as the processes being used. Such research is already on The Bodley Head, 1977.
the way to confirming solidly the connections between literature and literacy. M. Meek et al. Achieving Literacy: Longitudinal Case Studies of Adolescents Learning
to Read. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1983.
References Scollon, R., and S. B. Scollon. "The Literate ilvo Year Old: The Fictionalization of
Self." In R. and S. B. Scollon (Eds.), Narrative, Literacy, and Face in Intereth-
Britton, J. Language and Learning. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1979. nic Communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1981.
Butler, D. Cush la and Her Books. London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1979. Warlow, A. "Alternative Worlds Available." In M. Meek et al. (Eds.), The Cool Web.
Chatrnan, S. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca, London: The Bodley Head, 1977.
NY: Cornell University Press, 1978. Wells, G. "Story Reading and the Development of Symbolic Skills." Paper presented
Culler, J. Quoted in M. Meek. "How Do They Know It's Worth It? The Untaught at the Reading '82 conference, York University, Tbronto, Feb. 18, 1982.
Reading Lessons." In R. Arnold (Ed.), Timely Voices: English Teaching In the Williams, G., and D. Jack. "The Role of Story: Learning to Read in a Special Edu-
Eighties. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1983. cation Class." In Revaluing 7J- oubled Readers, Occasional Paper Number 15,
Docherty, M., "That's Not Right. Lookl There's No Daddy in This Book." In J. Program in Language and Literacy, College of Education, University of Ari-
Miller (Ed.), Eccentric Propositions: Essays on Literature and the Curriculum. zona, n.d.
London: Rout ledge and Kegan Paul, 1984.
Dombey, H. "Learning the Language of Books." In M. Meek (Ed.), Opening Moves: Wayne Sawyer teaches in the School of Thaching and Curriculum at the
Work in Progress in the Study of Children's Language Development. London: University of Sydney, Australia.
University of London Institute of Education, 1983.
Fox, C. 'Talking Like a Book: Young Children's Oral Monologues," In M. Meek
(Ed.), Opening Moves: Work in Progress in the Study of Children's Language
Development. London: University of London Institute of Education, 1983.
"The Book That Talks." Language Arts, 62(1985): 374-384.
Genette, G. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University
Press, 1980.
Graham, J. "Reading Literature with a Slow Learner." In J. Miller (Ed.), Eccentric
Propositions: Essays on Literature and the Curriculum. London: Routledge and
Kegan Paul, 1984.
Harding, D. W. "The Role of the Onlooker." Scrutiny, 6:3(1937).
Hardy, B. "Tbwards a Poetics of Fiction: An Approach Through Narrative." In M.
Meek et al. (Eds.), The Cool Web. London: The Bodley Head, 1977.
Heath, S. B., "What No Bedtime Story Means: Narrative Skills at Home and at
School." Language in Society, 11:1(1982).
May, S. "Story in its Writeful Place." In J. Miller (Ed.), Eccentric Propositions: Es-
says on Literature and the Curriculum. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul,
1984.
Moy, B., and M. Raleigh. "Comprehension. Bringing It Back Alive." In J. Miller
(Ed.), Eccentric Propositions: Essays on Literature and the Curriculum. Lon-
don:.Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1984.
69
Meek, M. "StAries Are for Telling." English in Education, 10:1(1976).
6 ao
Reprinted by permission from the Wisconsin State Reading Association Journal, 31 (1986):
3-9.
111xstegic Reading
Strategic reading seems to involve several elements. btriteoc
readers. obviously. use strategies. `systematic.
goal-dr..-vcted
behaviorls) that can be generalized beyond the Immediate tcsk.-
Strategic readers are flexible in their use of those reading sldils and
strategies Menges (1981) describes this flexibility when he says.
'nom experience with a large number of problems. learners
discover strategies that apply across the whole class of problems.
Or they may develop strategies for dealing with the
learning itself" process of
This type of flexibility Is considered to be characteristic of
experts. Strategic readers also act consciously and intent:wally. As
Paris. Upson. & Wixson (1983) suggest. 'Strategic actions
simplified sense. skills that are. In a
are made deliberate.' In addition.
strategic readers me aware of the reasons for reading. the
charact eristics of the text, and their relative success with reading.
By contrast. readers who are not strategic may not know about
strategies. may not realize the need to stop periodically to check
their own comprehension. and may not understand the benefits of
atrategt use. In short. these students may not have well developed
Metacognitive skills.
Studies of strategic reading have largely centered in three
overlapping areas: (a) mauninhig differences In strategic reading
among different groups. (b) identifying characteristics of strategic
readers. and (c) attempting to teach readers to rad strategically.
Many of the early studies Identified the characteristics of the
strategic readers. Later studies have tended to focus more on
attempts to develop strategic readers.
BEST COPY
71 AVAILABLE
readers 'had a restricted range of strategies for learning from text
and an even more naive concept of how to plan tasks or evaluate
acco-elish:nents.° farces mu=ted that 'One difference between
CectIve and ineffective learners is that effective learners generate
their own strztes for coding. retrieving. and . manipulating
knowledg-- they are in control of their learning process.'
...
TsaddogetudentstolleIffeothre litsategleltsadera .
IsitkrialMiltAtieweanitosisioliereosperon.
75
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
094
TURNING CONTEMPORARY READING RESEARCH
INTO INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICE
ALAN FRAGER
Miami University, Oxford, Ohio
and
AMOS HAHN
University of Texas, Arlington, Texas
If the 1960s and 1970s were the years that reading edu-
cators discovered that comprehension was really being tested,
not taught, and that the "Great Debate" between phonics
and whole-word instruction didn't matter much anyway,
then what have we learned in the 1980s? Many things, of
course, thanks to a quantum increase in the amount and
sophistication of reading research. The past era of reading
research, which focused on more global aspects of instruction
such as the effectiveness of the general approach the teacher
used or the books the children read, might be likened to
viewing reading instruction with a low-powered objective of
a microscope. While this perspective might have been helpful
for teachers choosing between instructional approaches
which were markedly different from each other (e.g., i/t/a,
synthetic phonics, and the linguistic approach), such benefit
is now limited because, as noted by Pearson (1985) and
Goodlad (1983), both instruction and instructional materials
have become homogeneous and eclectic to a high degree.
Contemporary reading research, as through the micro-
scope's more high-power objective, sheds light on finer
aspects of reading instruction, providing viewpoints on reading
and teaching which teachers can use in making smaller but
still significant modifications in their instructional practices.
Two of these "finer" aspects, modelling and direct teacher
explanation, seem to be the key mediators of research and
practice. This article highlights four promising areas of
contemporary reading research as well as the instructional
practices implied by recent findings.
7f
READING HORIZONS, Summer, 1988 page 264
77
READING HORIZONS, Summer, 1988 page 265
8
.
79
READING HORIZONS, Summer, 1988 page 267
fable on the board modeling the necessary writing processes.
This explanation and modeling should make explicit the
critical components needed for this type of writing. The
fables previously read should be examined in the light of
these critical components to .point out the room for devia-
tion from as well as conformity to the pattern. This model-
ing and analysis can help students view a genre as a set
of possibilities for writing instead of a set of limits.
Top-level Text Structure
Recent research has demonstrated that students who
display a sensitivity to a text's top-level structure (e.g.,
sequence, description), tend to (a) recall more important
detail information (Elliot, 1980; McGee, 1982; Taylor &
Samuels, 1982), (b) organize their recalls (either oral or
written) according to the text's overall structure (Hiebert,
Englert and Brennan, 1983; Meyer, Brandt and Bluth, 1980;
Taylor, 1980), and (c) show a transfer from text-structure
training to their own writing of expository prose (Taylor
and Beach, 1984). Since expository prose assumes increased
importance as students progress through their school years,
instruction regarding these top-level structures should be
considered: Description, sequence, enumeration, compare-
contrast, and problem/solution.
Text structure training should begin by using "pure"
examples of each text structure. If examples cannot be
located in texts, then examples will need to be generated
by the teacher. Each text structure should be explained by
the teacher. The teacher would stress how certain key
words in a text (e.g., first, second, same, different, etc.)
signal a specific structure, enumeration. Once a text struc-
ture has been identified, .the teacher would model how she
uses this structure to identify the most important informa-
tion in a text. S/he would then model how s/he rehearses
this important information to prepare for class discussions
of texts as well as writing research reports. Following
teacher explanation and modeling, students would be given
another text (same text structure) to practice identifying
and rehearsing the most important information.
Once students are familiar with this text structure
strategy, they should be expected to apply the strategy
independently when reading content-area texts. The teacher
should continually reinforce the use of this text structure
mcaWILN_1 rivrciz.viNal Jill ID met, 1.Y015 page 268
strategy by helping students to organize their writing
(papers, essay questions) as well as class discussion and/or
questions according to this strategy.
Main Idea Identification
A text strategy taught throughout all grade levels is
identifying the main idea of expository text. Baumann
(1982a) suggests that many students find this to be a diffi-
cult task. A possible reason for this difficulty is that com-
mercial materials used by teachers seem to vary in how
main idea is defined (Winograd & Brennan, 1983).
Hare and Milligan (1984) analyzed four well known
basal reading series to evaluate instructional explanations
for main idea identification. Although all the series agreed
on what main ideas are, where they are found and how
they are useful, all the series seemed to avoid the issue
of how one determines the main idea of a text. Overall,
main idea instruction was characterized by mentioning
rather than by true explanation.
Baumann and Serra (1984) analyzed various social
studies texts to determine how often main ideas are direct -.
ly stated in these texts and if most main idea statements
are found at the beginnings of paragraphs. They found
that for all texts surveyed, 44% of the passages contained
simple main ideas, 30% contained delayed completion main
ideas, and 26% contained inferred main ideas. Concerning
main idea placement, 63% of the simple main ideas were
found in the first sentence, 21% appeared in the middle of
the paragraph, and 12% appeared in the last sentence. But
when all passages were analyzed, only 29% had main ideas
stated in the first sentence position.
Because of the many problems inherent in commercial
programs and texts, direct explanation of this skill by
teachers is crucial. Using natural text (paragraph or pas-
sage), the teacher needs to explain how s/he determines if
a paragraph has an explicitly stated main idea sentence.
Instruction should begin with texts that do have directly
stated main idea sentences. Following sufficient teacher
explanation and modeling as well as student practice ses-
sions, implicit main idea instruction should be given. Using
natural texts also will sensitize students to the fact that
main ideas are not always found in the first sentence
READING HORIZONS, Summer, 1988 page 269
position and many times students will need to generate
their own main idea statements.
When students are competent at this strategy, they
could then be shown how their strategy assists in writing
a text summary, developing a chapter outline and in taking
notes for future study.
Conclusion
The four areas of contemporary research
reading
which have been the focus of this article--using direct ex-
planation to enhance the reading/writing connection as
well as to teach top-level text' structure and main idea
identification--are not the only promising or interesting
ideas under scrutiny by reading professionals. Nor do they
offer to reading teachers the guarantee that, if taught, all
comprehension problems would be resolved. Rather, the
implication is that teaachers do not need to substitute one
whole approach to teaching reading for another, like phonics
for linguistics, as was done so often in the past to improve
reading instruction. Improvement will more likely be the
result of teachers modeling and giving direct explanations
of specific reading strategies which have been demonstrated
to be effective for improving comprehension.
REFERENCES
Baumann, J.F. (1982). Research on children's main idea
comprehension: A problem of ecological validity. Read-
ing Psychology, 3, 167-177.
Baumann,J.F. & J.K.Serra. (1984). The frequency and place-
ment of main ideas in children's social studies text-
books. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 27-40.
Belloni,L.F. & E.A.Jongsma. (1978). The Effects of Interest
on Reading Comprehension of Low Achieving Students.
Journal of Reading, 22, 106-109.
Bergquist, L. & M. Kensock. (1981). Reluctant Readers are
Formed--Not Born. Ohio Reading Teacher, 16, 1981,9-13
Edelsky, C. & K. Smith. (1984). Is that writing--or are
those marks just a figment of your curriculum? Lan-
guage Arts, 61, 24-32.
Eliot, S. (1980). Children's knowledge and use of organiza-
tional patterns of prose in recalling what they read.
82
READING HORIZONS, Summer, 1988 page 270
83
READING HORIZONS, Summer, 1988 page 271
ERIC Clearinghouse on
Reading, English, and Communication
Indiana University
Bloomington, Indiana
How to Read an ERIC Abstract
and Find Related Articles on this Subject
The ERIC educational resource database includes more than 800,000 bibliographic records.
Educational resources listed in the ERIC database are of two types: EJ, journal (magazine)
articles, which are easily found in most Education libraries, or through interlibrary loan; and
ED, documents such as Master's theses, which are available at any library that has an ERIC
microfiche collection. ED documents can also be ordered directly from ERIC Document
Reproduction Service by using the form at the end of this bibliography section.
You may also wish to perform your own ERIC database search, to retrieve the most current
information on your topic. This is easily done at any Education library; it may also be
available to you online through your university computing system.
In the following bibliography, we have selected some recent relevant articles that you may
wish to read for your further knowledge, or to use in a Distance Education
Application/Research Project. ERIC abstracts are easy to read, once you are used to the
system, which is detailed below.
AN: ED379626
AU: Ruddell,-Robert-B., Ed.; And-Others 90
Hot Topic Guide 26: Updated Bibliography 4
AN: EJ497017 a discussion of five areas for future research: (1) the
AU: Peat,-David-W. nature of reading; (2) learning to read and write; (3) the
TI: Towards Minimizing Social, Cultural, and acquisition of knowledge; (4) critical reading and
Intellectual Disruptions Embedded In Literacy thinking; and (5) the education of reading teachers.
Instruction. (RS)
PY: 1994
JN: Interchange; v25 n3 p261-79 Sep 1994 AN: EJ485211
AV: UMI AU: Kiefer,-Barbara
AB: To explain the concept of literacy, the Integrative TI: The Literature-Based Movement: Yesterday,
Systems Model of Literacy is developed, illustrating Today and Tomorrow.
how understanding literacy has direct applications to PY: 1994
both instruction and research. The model's utility in JN: Emergency-Librarian; v21 n5 p8-13 May-Jun 1994
reconciling opposing concepts of literacy is shown, AV: UMI
presenting practical suggestions for literacy instruction AB: Discusses literature-based classrooms and
which minimize social, cultural, and intellectual influences on students' reading habits. Highlights
disruption. (Author/SM) include beliefs about learning and teaching, including a
comparison of the transmission model and the
AN: EJ496027 transactional model of education; the importance of
AU: Dimino,-Joseph-A.; And-Others literary experiences for language development and
TI: Synthesis of the Research on Story Grammar as literacy learning, including phonological development;
a Means to Increase Comprehension. and efferent reading and aesthetic reading. (Contains
PY: 1995 48 references.) (LRW)
JN: Reading- and - Writing - Quarterly: - Overcoming-
Learning- Difficulties; v11 n1 p53-72 Jan-Mar 1995 AN: EJ480984
NT: Mini-Theme: Direct Instruction Reading. AU: Rekrut,- Martha -D.
AB: Reviews research on the effectiveness of story TI: Peer and Cross-Age Tutoring: The Lessons of
grammar in promoting the comprehension of narrative Research.
text in students with learning disabilities and at-risk PY: 1994
students. Offers Instructional recommendations for JN: Journal-of-Reading; v37 n5 p356-62 Feb 1994
successful Implementation of this strategy. (RS) AV: UMI
AB: Offers an overview of research findings on peer
AN: EJ494576 and cross-age tutoring, including what elements of
AU: Dowhower,-Sarah-L. reading are amenable to tutoring, the effects of the age
TI: Repeated Reading Revisited: Research Into and ability of tutors, gender pairing, and tutor training.
Practice. (SR)
PY: 1994
JN: Reading- and - Writing - Quarterly: - Overcoming- AN: EJ468599
Learning- Difficulties; v10 n4 p343-58 Oct-Dec 1994 AU: Pearson,-P.-David
NT: Mini-Theme: Individual Differences in Reading and TI: Teaching and Learning Reading: A Research
Writing. Perspective (Focus on Research).
AB: Summarizes findings about repeated reading since PY: 1993
the 1970s and details the most recent findings. Argues JN: Language-Arts; v70 n6 p502-11 Oct 1993
that, because of strong evidence of the effectiveness of AV: UMI
repeated reading, the many facets of this procedure NT: Themed Issue: Reading Instruction Today.
should be Integrated into the fabric of daily literacy AB: Synthesizes research on the basic processes and
Instruction. Offers specific suggestions for applications instructional factors that influence literacy development.
Including applications geared to children with reading Points out patterns of agreement and disagreement
problems. (SR) among literacy scholars and practitioners. Presents an
agenda for reading research of the future. (RS)
AN: ED376443
AU: Anderson,-Richard-C. AN: EJ459558
TI: The Future of Reading Research. Technical AU: Nicholson,-Tom
Report No. 600. TI: Reading Wars: A Brief History and an Update.
CS: Center for the Study of Reading, Urbana, IL. PY: 1992
PY: 1994 JN: Intemational-Joumal-of-Disability,-Development-
NT: 18 p. and-Education; v39 n3 p173-84 1992
PR: EDRS Price - MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. NT: Theme Issue: Reading Difficulties.
AB: Providing a context for discussion rather than an AB: The debate among major theorists of the whole-
insider's point of view, this report discusses the current language approach (Kenneth Goodman and Frank
state of reading research. The report reviews differing Smith) and their critics (e.g., Philip Gough) is
visions of educational reform of reading instruction summarized. It concludes that the Goodman/Smith
espoused by supporters of phonics and by supporters theoretical position has not stood the test of time,
of the whole language approach. The report then though some of their Instructional recommendations
proposes four criteria for use in selecting future may be valid for other reasons. (Author/DB)
research projects--attack the most important problems,
attack problems whose solutions will lead to the
greatest advance in knowledge, attack problems the
field can solve, and attack problems whose solutions
can be implemented readily. The report concludes with
91
AN: ED373319 NT: 14 p.
AU: Flowers,-Pearl; Roos,-Marie-C. PR: EDRS Price - MF01/PC01 Plus Postage.
TI: Literature-Based Reading Programs: Elements AB: Various lines of research demonstrate that children
for Success. do not need intensive phonics instruction to develop the
PY: 1994 functional command of letter/sound patterns that they
NT: 49 p. need as readers. The fact that children normally learn
PR: EDRS Price - MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. highly complex processes and systems by merely
AB: This paper reviews the literature and research on interacting with the external world is perhaps the most
literature-based reading programs (as an alternative to important reason why children do not need systematic
basal reading instruction) that have proven successful and intensive phonics Instruction. Other reasons
and identifies key elements of such programs. The first (based on research) are: (1) English is an alphabetic
part of the paper contains an Introduction, a statement language, but by no means a phonetic one; (2)
of the problem, the significance of the problem, a spelling/sound relationships are extremely complex, so
description of the procedures to be used, and complex that commonly taught phonics generalizations
definitions of terms. The second part of the paper are not reliable; (3) patterns of letters are much more
presents a review of the literature and research related consistent than the relationships between single
to literature-based reading programs. The last part of sounds and syllables; (4) it Is much easier for young
the paper Includes a summary, conclusion, and children to hear and grasp syllables and syllable-like
recommendations. The paper concludes that the units in written language than to hear separate letter
success of literature-based reading programs is well- sounds; (5) proficient reading involves using everything
documented and that such programs serve as a viable readers know to get words and construct meaning from
approach to teaching reading at the elementary level. text; (6) too much emphasis on phonics encourages
Recommendations offered in the paper Include: (1) children to use 'sound it out" as their first and possibly
literature-based reading instruction should be only independent strategy for dealing with problem
introduced at the earliest grades; (2) librarians, words; (7) many emergent readers are not good at
teachers, and parents need to cooperate in carrying out leaming analytically, abstractly, or auditorily; (8)
effective literature-based programs in their schools; (3) research purporting to demonstrate the superiority of
longitudinal studies should be conducted to determine intensive systematic phonics over incidental phonics
the long range effect of literature-based reading (most of which is pre-1967) is not very impressive; and
programs on academic achievement; and (4) teachers (9) more recent research comparing whole language
should provide an environment in which students view classrooms with traditional skills-based classrooms
themselves as good readers who can enjoy and profit (including those that emphasize phonics) has found
from various kinds of materials. Contains 58 that children develop phonics skills as well or better in
references. (RS) whole language classrooms as measured on
standardized tests. (Contains 41 references.) (RS)
AN: ED371291
AU: Abromitis,-Barbara AN: ED370082
TI: The Role of Metacognition in Reading AU: Shearer,-Arleen-P.; Homan,-Susan-P.
Comprehension: Implications for Instruction. TI: Linking Reading Assessment to Instruction: An
Literacy Research Report No. 19. Application Worktext for Elementary Classroom
CS: Northern Illinois Univ., De Kalb. Curriculum and Teachers.
Instruction Reading Clinic. PY: 1994
PY: 1994 AV: St. Martin's Press, Inc., 175 Fifth Avenue, New
AV: NIU Reading Clinic, Graham 119-Northern Illinois York, NY 10010 ($18.66).
University, Deka lb, IL 60115. NT: 271 p.
NT: 31 p. PR: Document Not Available from EDRS.
PR: EDRS Price - MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. AB: A field-tested 'worktext," this book applies current
AB: Metacognition has received recent attention by theory to classroom practice by providing, in each
researchers and teachers alike because of the chapter, a brief explanation of major concepts followed
possibilities for successful instruction and intervention by guided practical experience in administering,
for readers at all levels. This paper explores the area of scoring, and interpreting reading assessment
metacognition as it relates specifically to reading techniques. The book emphasizes the use of
comprehension. The paper addresses six areas: (1) the assessment and diagnosis for instructional decision-
definitions of metacognition, metacomprehension and making; stresses the use of informal assessment
metalinguistic awareness; (2) the significance of techniques but also includes coverage of standardized
metacognition In the cognitive processing of written text test scores; provides both classroom tested results in
by good and poor readers; (3) the teacher's role in interpretations of data; and includes numerous "hands-
developing metacognitive abilities; (4) specific on" activity worksheets. Chapters in the book are: (1)
strategies that have successfully increased Assessment and Diagnosis Defined; (2) Self-
metacognitive skills; (5) ideas for assessing Evaluation; (3) Structured Observations and the
metacognitive abilities both for research and instruction Interview; (4) Using Standardized Test Scores; (5)
purposes; and (6) recommendations for future study of Identifying Problem Readers; (6) Informal Reading
the role metacognition plays within the reading process. Inventory; (7) Evaluating Comprehension Strategies;
Contains 87 references. (RS) (8) Assessment of Word-Recognition Knowledge and
Spelling Stages; and (9) Grouping and Instructional
AN: ED370090 Decision Making. Directions for the Directed Listening-
AU: Weaver,-Constance Thinking Activity, directions for the Language
TI: Phonics Revisited. Experience Approach, and extra forms are attached.
PY: [1994] (RS)
92
Hot Topic Guide 26: Updated Bibliography 6
94
Hot Topic Guide 26: Updated Bibliography 8
AN: ED377523 comprehension at the elementary school level.
TI: Portfolios and Your Child: Some Questions and Subjects, 30 fifth-grade boys and girls in a low
Answers for Parents and Families. socioeconomic area of Brooklyn, New York, were
CS: Vermont State Dept. of Education, Montpelier. divided into experimental and control groups. Subjects
PY: 1994 in the experimental group used a computer 1 day a
NT: 9 p. week for 9 weeks to read and answer questions on
PR: EDRS Price - MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. reading passages. Subjects in the control group read
AB: Noting that portfolios contain the students' best and answered questions on reading passages using
efforts at writing and mathematics problem-solving handouts. Results indicated that both groups increased
skills, this pamphlet discusses issues surrounding their reading comprehension scores, and that no
Vermont's portfolio assessment program from the statistically significant differences in reading
parent's point of view. The pamphlet discusses comprehension between the groups existed. Results
reasons to use portfolios, how portfolios differ from also indicated that even though both groups had an
traditional ways of looking at students' writing and math overall positive attitude toward reading and
skills, what goes into a portfolio, how portfolios are computers, the experimental group's positive attitude
evaluated, how the results of portfolio assessment are seemed more definite. The implication for instruction is
used by various entities, special needs students, and that if a group of students is given access to computer
what parents and family members can do to help. assisted reading instruction, reading scores and
(RS) reading comprehension will increase. (Contains 37
references, 8 appendixes of data, and 4 survey
Computer Assisted Instruction In Reading instruments.) (RS)
98
Hot Topic Guide 26: Updated Bibliography 12
BEST COPY AVAILABLE,
AN: EJ297934 the book deal with the following areas: (1) reading
AU: Wiesendanger,-Katherine-D.; Birlem,-Ellen-D. programs, (2) effective schools and effective teaching
TI: The Effectiveness of SSR: An Overview of the research, (3) developing lifetime readers, (4) learning
Research. from text, (5) comprehension and thinking skills, (6)
PY: 1984 vocabulary, (7) readability, (8) objectives and materials,
JN: Reading-Horizons; v24 n3 p197-201 Spr 1984 (9) integrating oral and written language, (10) grouping,
AV: UMI (11) teacher decision making, (12) metacognition, and
AB: Reviews research concerning sustained silent (13) staff development. A 27-page bibliography
reading and lists factors that are important in concludes the document. (FL)
determining whether such a reading program is
successful. (FL) AN: ED273924
AU: Mason,-Jana-M.; Allen,-JoBeth
AN: ED279997 TI: A Review of Emergent Literacy with Implications
AU: Miller,-Becky-Iden for Research and Practice in Reading. Technical
TI: Parental Involvement Effects Reading Report No. 379.
Achievement of First, Second, and Third Graders. CS: Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Inc., Cambridge,
PY: 1986 Mass.; Illinois Univ., Urbana. Center for the Study of
NT: 43 p.; Exit Project, Indiana University at South Reading.
Bend. PY: 1986
PR: EDRS Price - MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. NT: 99 p.
AB: A review of research data focused on the effects of PR: EDRS Price - MF01/PC04 Plus Postage.
parental involvement on children's reading achievement AB: Defining emergent as the process of becoming and
and ways in which parents can help promote children's literacy as the interrelatedness of reading and writing in
reading achievement. The review included 35 studies young children's development, this paper reviews
(which are briefly summarized) of (1) parents' attitudes emergent literacy research and relates it to beginning
about their involvement in their child's education, (2) reading and writing instruction. The first section of the
the positive effects of parent/teacher interaction on paper describes the social and linguistic contexts for
children's reading achievement, (3) parental practices literacy, reviewing research that shows communication
at home that influence children's reading achievement, patterns and practices and parent-scaffolding of literacy
(4) the effects of parental involvement in the classroom for preschool children to be critically important events
on children's reading achievement, and (5) ways to for literacy development. The second section deals with
educate parents about guiding their children in effective oral and written language distinctions and describes
reading activities. Results of the review indicated that why literacy is not a simple extension of oral language.
children's achievement can be increased through The third section reviews research on the acquisition of
parental involvement and parent/teacher interaction. emergent reading and writing skills and knowledge,
Parent attitude surveys revealed that most parents while the fourth presents examples of landmark
want to be involved in their children's education. instructional studies that adopt an emergent literacy
Reading to children and listening to them read for 10 perspective. (Author/FL)
minutes daily were found to be the most significant
ways parents could increase their children's reading AN: ED272842
achievement. Findings also indicated that parents can AU: Faman,-Nancy-J.
also affect children's achievement by playing TI: A Look at Reading and Writing as Similar
educational games, going to the library, and viewing Language Skills: A Review.
educational television programs with them. Results PY: [1985]
showed that educating parents to guide their children's NT: 24 p.
reading at home often increases children's reading PR: EDRS Price - MF01/PC01 Plus Postage.
achievement. (Lists of recommendations for parents AB: Four similarities between reading and writing and
and teachers are included, as well as a four-page their corresponding instructional significance are
bibliography.) (JD) examined in this literature review. Each of the four
reviewed topics is prefaced by general instructional
AN: ED273928 suggestions based on research cited in the review.
AU: Alvermann,-Donna, Ed.; And-Others Topics and suggestions are as follows: (1) linguistic- -
TI: Research within Reach: Secondary School whenever possible, the processes of reading and
Reading. A Research-Guided Response to the writing should be integrated within the framework of
Concerns of Educators. classroom instruction; (2) cognitive--by virtue of the
CS: Appalachia Educational Lab., Charleston, W. Va. interrelationship between thought and language,
PY: 1986 reading and writing should be integrated across all
NT: 283 p.; For a related document on mathematics, content areas to enhance students' skills in thinking
see ED 225 842. and learning; (3) affective--strategies that take into
PR: EDRS Price - MF01/PC12 Plus Postage. account students' interest, attention, and motivation are
AB: Intended for secondary school teachers in all necessary for effective language skill development,
subject areas, this book synthesizes and translates since each of these variables influences students'
reading-related research on a variety of specific topics. ability to use their language skills to maximum
Each chapter in the book opens with a question or potential; and (4) instructional -- instruction should
questions posed by teachers, then proceeds to a emphasize the complementary nature of reading and
discussion of the research and practice pertaining to writing as mutually facilitative, not mutually exclusive,
the issues raised. Each chapter ends with a summary language skills. The review ends by presenting a model
and a list of references. Each chapter can be read of reading and writing as similar language skills. A
independently. Questions raised in the 13 chapters of three-page reference list is appended. (HOD)
AN: ED227093
AU: Emans,-Robert
TI: Teaching Behaviors In Reading instruction: A
Review of the Research and Critique.
PY: 1983
NT: 49 p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of
the American Association of Colleges for Teacher
Education (Detroit, MI, February 24, 1983).
PR: EDRS Price - MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage.
AB: This paper summarizes research findings on
teacher behavior and its relationship to student reading
achievement. Research studies included in the review
identified actual teaching behaviors, included
observations of teacher-learner interactions, were
limited to elementary school, and were conducted
between 1966 and 1972. Subjects covered in the
studies include: (1) instructional time and student
achievement; (2) direct instruction; (3) classroom
climate and teacher management; (4) teacher praise
and criticism; (5) teacher expectations; (6) teachers'
use of questions; (7) specialized subject matter
teaching behaviors; and (8) changing teacher behavior
through interactive inservice programs. A discussion is
presented on the research methodology used in these
studies, the general reliability of research findings, and
significant and recurring findings brought forward by
this review. A list of 126 references is included. (JD) 100
AN: ED281140
AU: Tiemey,-Robert-J.; Pearson,-P.-David
TI: Schema Theory and implications for Teaching
Reading: A Conversation. Reading Education
Report No. 67.
PY: 1986
NT: 19 p.
.101
116
ORDERING INSTRUCTIONS
- Enter 6-Digit ED Number - Enter Quantity. Specifying Microfiche (MF) or Paper Copy (PC)
- Enter Number of Pages in Document Enter Total Price per Document
- Enter Document Price from Price Schedule Below Enter Shipping Charges - Sec Instructions on Reverse
Quantity
No. of Document Total ERIC DOCUMENT PRICE SCHEDULE"
ED Number Pages Price MF PC Price Based on Number of Pages in Original Document
Paper Copy (PC) Microfiche (MF)
Price No. of Price No. of
Code Pages Price Code Pages Price
PCO1 1 - 25 S 3.30 MF01 1 -480 S1.18
PCO2 26 - 50 S 6.60 MF02 481 - 576 $1.43
PC03 51 - 75 S 9.90 MF03 577 - 672 $1.68
PC04 76 - 100 S13.20 MF04 673 - 768 S1.93
PC05 101 - 125 $16.50 MFO5 769 - 864 $218
PC06 126 - 150 $19.80 MFO6 865 - 960 S2.43
PC07 151 175 $23.10 MAW 961 - 1056 52.68
Subtotal Each Additional 25 Pages Each Additional 96 Pages
or Fraction = S3.30 (1 Microfiche) or Fraction = 5.2.5
Shinto*
Tax PRICES ARE PER DOCUMENT
TOTAL COST 'EDRS prices are good through December 31, 1993.
All residents of AL. AZ. CA. CO, DC. FL. GA. IL. KY. LA. MA, MD, MO. NJ. NY. Prices will change January 1 of each year.
OH, PA. TX, UT, VA, and WA mast add state and local axes (subject to change).
GST will be collected on orders shipped to Canada.
t
UPS RATE CHART USPS FIRST CLASS RATE CHART
Shipping Charges should not exceed the following:
(
1-7 3-19 2040 31:42 43-54 55-67 68430
1 b. 211x. 3 lbs. 4 lbs. 5 lbs. Microfiche hficrofiehe Microfiche Microfiche Microfiche Microfiche Microfiche
111.160 MF 161-330 MF 331-503 MF 301470 MF 671440 M17 832 8.75 5.98 S121 S144 $1.67 $1.90
ex a a a a
.
DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS
Customers who have a continuing need for ERIC Documents may open a Deposit Account by depositing a minimum of $300.00. Once
an account is opened, ERIC Documents will be sent upon request, and the account charged for the actual cost and postage. A statement
of the account will be furnished with each order.
BACK COLLECTIONS
Back collections of documents in all issues of RIE since 1966 are available on microfiche at a unit price of $0.141 per microfiche. The
collections are furnished on diazo film without envelopes. Prices are good through December 31,1993, and do not include shipping charges
and applicable taxes. For pricing information, write or call toll-free 1-800-443-ERIC.
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. PAPER COPY (PC)
A Paper Copy is a xerographic reproduction, on paper, from microfiche of the original document. Each paper copy has a Vellum Bristol
cover to identify and protect the document.
2. PAYMENT
The prices set forth herein do not include any sales, use, excise, or similar taxes that may apply to the sale of microfiche or paper copy
to the customer. The cost of such taxes, if any, shall be borne by the customer.
For all orders that are not prepaid and require an invoice, payment shall be made net thirty (30) days from the date of the invoice.
Please make checks or money orders payable to CBIS (must be in U.S. funds and payable on a U.S. bank).
3. REPRODUCTION
'Permission to further reproduce a copyrighted document provided hereunder must be obtained from the copyright holder, usually noted
on the front or back of the title page of the copyrighted document.
BEST COPY AvA, 4 ..,... ,,,
4. QUALITY 103 ,........_,
CBIS Federal will only replace products returned because of reproduction defects or incompleteness caused by EDRS.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OEM)
Educational Resources information Center (ERIC) ERIC
NOTICE
REPRODUCTION BASIS
(9/92)