Jemh 106 Kekee
Jemh 106 Kekee
TRIANGLES 6
6.1 Introduction
You are familiar with triangles and many of their properties from your earlier classes.
In Class IX, you have studied congruence of triangles in detail. Recall that two figures
are said to be congruent, if they have the same shape and the same size. In this
chapter, we shall study about those figures which have the same shape but not necessarily
the same size. Two figures having the same shape (and not necessarily the same size)
are called similar figures. In particular, we shall discuss the similarity of triangles and
apply this knowledge in giving a simple proof of Pythagoras Theorem learnt earlier.
Can you guess how heights of mountains (say Mount Everest) or distances of
some long distant objects (say moon) have been found out? Do you think these have
Rationalised 2023-24
74 MATHEMATICS
been measured directly with the help of a measuring tape? In fact, all these heights
and distances have been found out using the idea of indirect measurements, which is
based on the principle of similarity of figures (see Example 7, Q.15 of Exercise 6.3
and also Chapters 8 and 9 of this book).
Rationalised 2023-24
TRIANGLES 75
What can you say about the two quadrilaterals ABCD and PQRS
(see Fig 6.2)?Are they similar? These figures appear to be similar but we cannot be
certain about it.Therefore, we must have some definition of similarity of figures and
based on this definition some rules to decide whether the two given figures are similar
or not. For this, let us look at the photographs given in Fig. 6.3:
Fig. 6.3
You will at once say that they are the photographs of the same monument
(Taj Mahal) but are in different sizes. Would you say that the three photographs are
similar? Yes,they are.
What can you say about the two photographs of the same size of the same
person one at the age of 10 years and the other at the age of 40 years? Are these
photographs similar? These photographs are of the same size but certainly they are
not of the same shape. So, they are not similar.
What does the photographer do when she prints photographs of different sizes
from the same negative? You must have heard about the stamp size, passport size and
postcard size photographs. She generally takes a photograph on a small size film, say
of 35mm size and then enlarges it into a bigger size, say 45mm (or 55mm). Thus, if we
consider any line segment in the smaller photograph (figure), its corresponding line
45 55
segment in the bigger photograph (figure) will be or of that of the line segment.
35 35
This really means that every line segment of the smaller photograph is enlarged
(increased) in the ratio 35:45 (or 35:55). It can also be said that every line segment
of the bigger photograph is reduced (decreased) in the ratio 45:35 (or 55:35). Further,
if you consider inclinations (or angles) between any pair of corresponding line segments
in the two photographs of different sizes, you shall see that these inclinations(or angles)
are always equal. This is the essence of the similarity of two figures and in particular
of two polygons. We say that:
Two polygons of the same number of sides are similar, if (i) their
corresponding angles are equal and (ii) their corresponding sides are in the
same ratio (or proportion).
Rationalised 2023-24
76 MATHEMATICS
Note that the same ratio of the corresponding sides is referred to as the scale
factor (or the Representative Fraction) for the polygons. You must have heard that
world maps (i.e., global maps) and blue prints for the construction of a building are
prepared using a suitable scale factor and observing certain conventions.
In order to understand similarity of figures more clearly, let us perform the following
activity:
Activity 1 : Place a lighted bulb at a
point O on the ceiling and directly below
it a table in your classroom. Let us cut a
polygon, say a quadrilateral ABCD, from
a plane cardboard and place this
cardboard parallel to the ground between
the lighted bulb and the table. Then a
shadow of ABCD is cast on the table.
Mark the outline of this shadow as
ABCD (see Fig.6.4).
Note that the quadrilateral ABCD is
an enlargement (or magnification) of the
quadrilateral ABCD. This is because of
the property of light that light propogates
in a straight line. You may also note that Fig. 6.4
A lies on ray OA, B lies on ray OB, C
lies on OC and D lies on OD. Thus, quadrilaterals ABCD and ABCD are of the
same shape but of different sizes.
So, quadrilateral ABCD is similiar to quadrilateral ABCD. We can also say
that quadrilateral ABCD is similar to the quadrilateral ABCD.
Here, you can also note that vertex A corresponds to vertex A, vertex B
corresponds to vertex B, vertex C corresponds to vertex C and vertex D corresponds
to vertex D. Symbolically, these correspondences are represented as A A, B B,
C C and D D. By actually measuring the angles and the sides of the two
quadrilaterals, you may verify that
(i) A = A, B = B, C = C, D = D and
AB BC CD DA .
(ii)
A B B C C D D A
This again emphasises that two polygons of the same number of sides are
similar, if (i) all the corresponding angles are equal and (ii) all the corresponding
sides are in the same ratio (or proportion).
Rationalised 2023-24
TRIANGLES 77
From the above, you can easily say that quadrilaterals ABCD and PQRS of
Fig. 6.5 are similar.
Fig. 6.5
Remark : You can verify that if one polygon is similar to another polygon and this
second polygon is similar to a third polygon, then the first polygon is similar to the third
polygon.
You may note that in the two quadrilaterals (a square and a rectangle) of
Fig. 6.6, corresponding angles are equal, but their corresponding sides are not in the
same ratio.
Fig. 6.6
So, the two quadrilaterals are not similar. Similarly, you may note that in the two
quadrilaterals (a square and a rhombus) of Fig. 6.7, corresponding sides are in the
same ratio, but their corresponding angles are not equal. Again, the two polygons
(quadrilaterals) are not similar.
Rationalised 2023-24
78 MATHEMATICS
Fig. 6.7
Thus, either of the above two conditions (i) and (ii) of similarity of two
polygons is not sufficient for them to be similar.
EXERCISE 6.1
1. Fill in the blanks using the correct word given in brackets :
(i) All circles are . (congruent, similar)
(ii) All squares are . (similar, congruent)
(iii) All triangles are similar. (isosceles, equilateral)
(iv) Two polygons of the same number of sides are similar, if (a) their corresponding
angles are and (b) their corresponding sides are . (equal,
proportional)
2. Give two different examples of pair of
(i) similar figures. (ii) non-similar figures.
3. State whether the following quadrilaterals are similar or not:
Fig. 6.8
Rationalised 2023-24
TRIANGLES 79
Rationalised 2023-24
80 MATHEMATICS
Theorem 6.1 : If a line is drawn parallel to one side of a triangle to intersect the
other two sides in distinct points, the other two sides are divided in the same
ratio.
Proof : We are given a triangle ABC in which a line
parallel to side BC intersects other two sides AB and
AC at D and E respectively (see Fig. 6.10).
AD AE
We need to prove that .
DB EC
Let us join BE and CD and then draw DM AC and
EN AB. Fig. 6.10
1 1
Now, area of ADE (= base × height) = AD × EN.
2 2
Recall from Class IX, that area of ADE is denoted as ar(ADE).
1
So, ar(ADE) = AD × EN
2
1
Similarly, ar(BDE) = DB × EN,
2
1 1
ar(ADE) = AE × DM and ar(DEC) = EC × DM.
2 2
1
ar(ADE) AD × EN
AD
Therefore, = 2 (1)
ar(BDE) 1
DB × EN DB
2
1
ar(ADE) AE × DM
2 AE
and = (2)
ar(DEC) 1
EC × DM EC
2
Note that BDE and DEC are on the same base DE and between the same parallels
BC and DE.
So, ar(BDE) = ar(DEC) (3)
Rationalised 2023-24
TRIANGLES 81
AD AE
=
DB EC
Is the converse of this theorem also true (For the meaning of converse, see
Appendix 1)? To examine this, let us perform the following activity:
AB2 AC2 2
= and B2C2 || BC (2)
B2 B C2C 3
AB3 AC3 3
= and B3C3 || BC (3)
B3B C3 C 2
AB4 AC4 4
= and B4C4 || BC (4)
B4 B C4C 1
From (1), (2), (3) and (4), it can be observed that if a line divides two sides of a
triangle in the same ratio, then the line is parallel to the third side.
You can repeat this activity by drawing any angle XAY of different measure and
taking any number of equal parts on arms AX and AY . Each time, you will arrive at
the same result. Thus, we obtain the following theorem, which is the converse of
Theorem 6.1:
Rationalised 2023-24
82 MATHEMATICS
AD AE
So, = (Why ?)
DB EC
AE AE
Therefore, = (Why ?)
EC EC
Adding 1 to both sides of above, you can see that E and E must coincide.
(Why ?)
Let us take some examples to illustrate the use of the above theorems.
AD AE
So, = (Theorem 6.1)
DB EC
DB EC
or, =
AD AE
DB EC
or, 1 = 1
AD AE
AB AC
or, =
AD AE
AD AE
So, =
AB AC Fig. 6.13
Rationalised 2023-24
TRIANGLES 83
AE AG
So, = (Theorem 6.1) (1)
ED GC
Similarly, from CAB,
Fig. 6.15
CG CF
=
AG BF
AG BF
i.e., = (2)
GC FC
Therefore, from (1) and (2),
AE BF
=
ED FC
PS PT
Example 3 : In Fig. 6.16, = and PST =
SQ TR
PRQ. Prove that PQR is an isosceles triangle.
PS PT
Solution : It is given that Fig. 6.16
SQ TR
So, ST || QR (Theorem 6.2)
Therefore, PST = PQR (Corresponding angles) (1)
Rationalised 2023-24
84 MATHEMATICS
EXERCISE 6.2
1. In Fig. 6.17, (i) and (ii), DE || BC. Find EC in (i) and AD in (ii).
Fig. 6.17
Rationalised 2023-24
TRIANGLES 85
AB BC CA ,
(ii) then the two triangles are similar (see Fig. 6.22).
DE EF FD
Fig. 6.22
Rationalised 2023-24
86 MATHEMATICS
It must be noted that as done in the case of congruency of two triangles, the
similarity of two triangles should also be expressed symbolically, using correct
correspondence of their vertices. For example, for the triangles ABC and DEF of
Fig. 6.22, we cannot write ABC ~ EDF or ABC ~ FED. However, we
can write BAC ~ EDF.
Now a natural question arises : For checking the similarity of two triangles, say
ABC and DEF, should we always look for all the equality relations of their corresponding
angles ( A = D, B = E, C = F) and all the equality relations of the ratios
AB BC CA
of their corresponding sides ? Let us examine. You may recall that
DE EF FD
in Class IX, you have obtained some criteria for congruency of two triangles involving
only three pairs of corresponding parts (or elements) of the two triangles. Here also,
let us make an attempt to arrive at certain criteria for similarity of two triangles involving
relationship between less number of pairs of corresponding parts of the two triangles,
instead of all the six pairs of corresponding parts. For this, let us perform the following
activity:
Activity 4 : Draw two line segments BC and EF of two different lengths, say 3 cm
and 5 cm respectively. Then, at the points B and C respectively, construct angles PBC
and QCB of some measures, say, 60° and 40°. Also, at the points E and F, construct
angles REF and SFE of 60° and 40° respectively (see Fig. 6.23).
Fig. 6.23
Rationalised 2023-24
TRIANGLES 87
Let rays BP and CQ intersect each other at A and rays ER and FS intersect each
other at D. In the two triangles ABC and DEF, you can see that
B = E, C = F and A = D. That is, corresponding angles of these two
triangles are equal. What can you say about their corresponding sides ? Note that
BC 3 AB CA
0.6. What about and ? On measuring AB, DE, CA and FD, you
EF 5 DE FD
AB CA
will find that and are also equal to 0.6 (or nearly equal to 0.6, if there is some
DE FD
AB BC CA
error in the measurement). Thus, You can repeat this activity by
DE EF FD
constructing several pairs of triangles having their corresponding angles equal. Every
time, you will find that their corresponding sides are in the same ratio (or proportion).
This activity leads us to the following criterion for similarity of two triangles.
Theorem 6.3 : If in two triangles, corresponding angles are equal, then their
corresponding sides are in the same ratio (or proportion) and hence the two
triangles are similar.
This criterion is referred to as the AAA
(Angle–Angle–Angle) criterion of
similarity of two triangles.
This theorem can be proved by taking two
triangles ABC and DEF such that
A = D, B = E and C = F
(see Fig. 6.24)
Fig. 6.24
Cut DP = AB and DQ = AC and join PQ.
So, ABC DPQ (Why ?)
This gives B = P = E and PQ || EF (How?)
DP DQ
Therefore, = (Why?)
PE QF
AB AC
i.e., = (Why?)
DE DF
AB BC AB BC AC
Similarly, = and so .
DE EF DE EF DF
Remark : If two angles of a triangle are respectively equal to two angles of another
triangle, then by the angle sum property of a triangle their third angles will also be
equal. Therefore, AAA similarity criterion can also be stated as follows:
Rationalised 2023-24
88 MATHEMATICS
If two angles of one triangle are respectively equal to two angles of another
triangle, then the two triangles are similar.
This may be referred to as the AA similarity criterion for two triangles.
You have seen above that if the three angles of one triangle are respectively
equal to the three angles of another triangle, then their corresponding sides are
proportional (i.e., in the same ratio). What about the converse of this statement? Is the
converse true? In other words, if the sides of a triangle are respectively proportional to
the sides of another triangle, is it true that their corresponding angles are equal? Let us
examine it through an activity :
Activity 5 : Draw two triangles ABC and DEF such that AB = 3 cm, BC = 6 cm,
CA = 8 cm, DE = 4.5 cm, EF = 9 cm and FD = 12 cm (see Fig. 6.25).
Fig. 6.25
AB BC CA 2
So, you have : (each equal to )
DE EF FD 3
Now measure A, B, C, D, E and F. You will observe that
A = D, B = E and C = F, i.e., the corresponding angles of the two
triangles are equal.
You can repeat this activity by drawing several such triangles (having their sides
in the same ratio). Everytime you shall see that their corresponding angles are equal.
It is due to the following criterion of similarity of two triangles:
Rationalised 2023-24
TRIANGLES 89
Fig. 6.26
Cut DP = AB and DQ = AC and join PQ.
DP DQ
It can be seen that = and PQ || EF (How?)
PE QF
So, P= E and Q = F.
DP DQ PQ
Therefore, = =
DE DF EF
DP DQ BC
So, = = (Why?)
DE DF EF
So, BC = PQ (Why?)
Thus, ABC DPQ (Why ?)
So, A = D, B = E and C=F (How ?)
Remark : You may recall that either of the two conditions namely, (i) corresponding
angles are equal and (ii) corresponding sides are in the same ratio is not sufficient for
two polygons to be similar. However, on the basis of Theorems 6.3 and 6.4, you can
now say that in case of similarity of the two triangles, it is not necessary to check both
the conditions as one condition implies the other.
Let us now recall the various criteria for congruency of two triangles learnt in
Class IX. You may observe that SSS similarity criterion can be compared with the SSS
congruency criterion.This suggests us to look for a similarity criterion comparable to
SAS congruency criterion of triangles. For this, let us perform an activity.
Activity 6 : Draw two triangles ABC and DEF such that AB = 2 cm, A = 50°,
AC = 4 cm, DE = 3 cm, D = 50° and DF = 6 cm (see Fig.6.27).
Rationalised 2023-24
90 MATHEMATICS
Fig. 6.27
AB AC 2
Here, you may observe that = (each equal to ) and A (included
DE DF 3
between the sides AB and AC) = D (included between the sides DE and DF). That
is, one angle of a triangle is equal to one angle of another triangle and sides including
these angles are in the same ratio (i.e., proportion). Now let us measure B, C,
E and F.
You will find that B = E and C = F. That is, A = D, B = E and
C = F. So, by AAA similarity criterion, ABC ~ DEF. You may repeat this
activity by drawing several pairs of such triangles with one angle of a triangle equal to
one angle of another triangle and the sides including these angles are proportional.
Everytime, you will find that the triangles are similar. It is due to the following criterion
of similarity of triangles:
Theorem 6.5 : If one angle of a triangle is equal to one angle of the other
triangle and the sides including these angles are proportional, then the two
triangles are similar.
This criterion is referred to as
the SAS (Side–Angle–Side)
similarity criterion for two
triangles.
As before, this theorem can
be proved by taking two triangles
ABC and DEF such that
AB AC
( 1) and A = D
DE DF
(see Fig. 6.28). Cut DP = AB, DQ Fig. 6.28
= AC and join PQ.
Rationalised 2023-24
TRIANGLES 91
Fig. 6.29
Solution : PQ || RS (Given)
So, P= S (Alternate angles)
and Q= R
Also, POQ = SOR (Vertically opposite angles)
Therefore, POQ ~ SOR (AAA similarity criterion)
Fig. 6.30
Solution : In ABC and PQR,
Rationalised 2023-24
92 MATHEMATICS
AB 3.8 1 , BC 6 1 CA 3 3 1
and
RQ 7.6 2 QP 12 2 PR 6 3 2
AB BC CA
That is,
RQ QP PR
OA OD Fig. 6.31
So, = (1)
OC OB
Also, we have AOD = COB (Vertically opposite angles) (2)
Therefore, from (1) and (2), AOD ~ COB (SAS similarity criterion)
So, A = C and D = B
(Corresponding angles of similar triangles)
Rationalised 2023-24
TRIANGLES 93
BE AB
Therefore, =
DE CD
4.8 + x 3.6 90
i.e., = (90 cm = m = 0.9 m)
x 0.9 100
i.e., 4.8 + x = 4x
i.e., 3x = 4.8
i.e., x = 1.6
So, the shadow of the girl after walking for 4 seconds is 1.6 m long.
CM AB
(ii)
RN PQ
(iii) CMB ~ RNQ
Fig. 6.33
Solution : (i) ABC ~ PQR (Given)
AB BC CA
So, = (1)
PQ QR RP
and A = P, B = Q and C = R (2)
But AB = 2 AM and PQ = 2 PN
(As CM and RN are medians)
2 AM CA
So, from (1), 2PN =
RP
Rationalised 2023-24
94 MATHEMATICS
AM CA
i.e., = (3)
PN RP
Also, MAC = NPR [From (2)] (4)
So, from (3) and (4),
AMC ~ PNR (SAS similarity) (5)
CM CA
(ii) From (5), = (6)
RN RP
CA AB
But = [From (1)] (7)
RP PQ
CM AB
Therefore, = [From (6) and (7)] (8)
RN PQ
AB BC
(iii) Again, = [From (1)]
PQ QR
CM BC
Therefore, = [From (8)] (9)
RN QR
CM AB 2 BM
Also, =
RN PQ 2 QN
CM BM
i.e., = (10)
RN QN
CM BC BM
i.e., = [From (9) and (10)]
RN QR QN
Therefore, CMB ~ RNQ (SSS similarity)
[Note : You can also prove part (iii) by following the same method as used for proving
part (i).]
EXERCISE 6.3
1. State which pairs of triangles in Fig. 6.34 are similar. Write the similarity criterion used by
you for answering the question and also write the pairs of similar triangles in the symbolic
form :
Rationalised 2023-24
TRIANGLES 95
Fig. 6.34
OA OB
triangles, show that
OC OD
Rationalised 2023-24
96 MATHEMATICS
QR QT
4. In Fig. 6.36, and 1 = 2. Show
QS PR
that PQS ~ TQR.
CA BC Fig. 6.38
(ii)
PA MP
10. CD and GH are respectively the bisectors
of ACB and EGF such that D and H lie
on sides AB and FE of ABC and EFG
respectively. If ABC ~ FEG, show that:
CD AC
(i)
GH FG
(ii) DCB ~ HGE
(iii) DCA ~ HGF Fig. 6.39
Rationalised 2023-24
TRIANGLES 97
6.5 Summary
In this chapter you have studied the following points :
1. Two figures having the same shape but not necessarily the same size are called similar
figures.
2. All the congruent figures are similar but the converse is not true.
3. Two polygons of the same number of sides are similar, if (i) their corresponding angles
are equal and (ii) their corresponding sides are in the same ratio (i.e., proportion).
4. If a line is drawn parallel to one side of a triangle to intersect the other two sides in
distinct points, then the other two sides are divided in the same ratio.
5. If a line divides any two sides of a triangle in the same ratio, then the line is parallel to the
third side.
6. If in two triangles, corresponding angles are equal, then their corresponding sides are in
the same ratio and hence the two triangles are similar (AAA similarity criterion).
7. If in two triangles, two angles of one triangle are respectively equal to the two angles of
the other triangle, then the two triangles are similar (AA similarity criterion).
Rationalised 2023-24
98 MATHEMATICS
8. If in two triangles, corresponding sides are in the same ratio, then their corresponding
angles are equal and hence the triangles are similar (SSS similarity criterion).
9. If one angle of a triangle is equal to one angle of another triangle and the sides including
these angles are in the same ratio (proportional), then the triangles are similar
(SAS similarity criterion).
Rationalised 2023-24