Lesson 6 - Conducting A Meaningful Flight Review
Lesson 6 - Conducting A Meaningful Flight Review
In this module we’ll offer tips on how to conduct a meaningful flight review and instrument proficiency check (IPC).
Conducting a flight review or IPC is arguably the most important lesson you conduct as a flight instructor.
You are essentially recertifying a pilot to
Exercise their privileges for the next 24 calendar months, or
Operate safely in all aspects of instrument flying
You will want to be aware that you may find the pilot has some potentially catastrophic weaknesses or habits
This article by John King addresses three ways to approach lowering the GA accident rate: “Three counter-intuitive
solutions to general aviation problems”. These solutions may cause you to think differently about how you can
make an impact on the accident rate. Please take a few minutes to review the article now.
You may have noticed that the FAA no longer uses the term “Biennial Flight Review”.
“Biennial” implies that pilots only need currency training once every 24 calendar months
Encourage your customers to seek currency training as often as they need it to stay proficient in the different
Aircraft categories, classes, and types they fly
Operations they conduct
You will want to give some thought about what to cover during a flight review/IPC.
You’re in the best position to determine what will be most valuable to your customer
There’s also lots of information available from the FAA on this subject including AC 61-98D, Currency
Requirements and Guidance for the Flight Review and Instrument Proficiency Check
This AC has a wealth of helpful information such as
Helping pilots develop personal currency plans, including a sample outline pilots can use to make their
proficiency practice plans
Ways to help reduce general aviation accidents
Sample flight review and IPC checklists and regulatory review guides
If you are not familiar with this AC, please click on the link above and spend time familiarizing yourself with
how it is organized and the types of guidance that are provided
You can also find this AC in the CFI Resource Materials
You can use all the modules in this FIRC as resources for topics.
You will also want to give some thought to how to conduct a flight review or IPC, including
Managing expectations
Honest evaluation
Offering additional training, and
Turning an unsatisfactory performance into success
You can use the CFI Resource Materials from this course as a good reference when creating your plan.
The pilot is a successful local businessman in his early forties who regularly flies his Bonanza around
the state on business. He calls a local flight school to schedule a flight review and is told it will consist
of 1 hour of ground and 1 hour of flight. The school schedules him for 0900 the next morning.
When he arrives at the school he’s greeted by one of the schools newest instructors. The instructor does an
excellent job of determining the type of flying the pilot does, how often he flies, etc, and puts together a well thought
out plan for the morning. He tells the customer they will go out of the area and do slow flight and stalls, and then
return for pattern work. The businessman glances at his watch, then back to the CFI, and says, “Son, we’re going
to do a few landings and be done with it.” The instructor pauses and then says, “OK”.
Before conducting a flight review or IPC, you should review the following references where applicable, and have your
customer review them as well:
The applicable Airman Certification Standards (ACS)
Aeronautical Information Manual (AIM)
Airplane Flying Handbook
Instrument Flying Handbook
Instrument Procedures Handbook
Information for Operators (InFO) 15012, Logging Instrument Approach Procedures (IAP)
AC 60-28B, FAA English Language Standard for an FAA Certificate Issued Under 14 CFR Parts 61, 63, 65, and
107
AC 61-65H, Certification: Pilots and Flight and Ground Instructors
AC 61-89E, Pilot Certificates: Aircraft Type Ratings
AC 61-136B, FAA Approval of Aviation Training Devices and Their Use for Training and Experience
AC 91-73B, Part 91 and 135 Single Pilot, Flight School Procedures During Taxi Operations
The Airplane Flying Handbook has been updated (2021), and some of the changes to note include
An introduction to and the benefits of the WINGS program, how to access it, and how to create an
account
An entire new chapter on Energy Management
Which is about managing the airplane’s altitude and airspeed using an energy-
centered approach, and covers
Basic energy management concepts
The energy role of the controls for managing the airplane’s energy
state
How to identify, assess, and mitigate risks associated with
mismanaging the airplane’s energy state
The addition of information on lazy eights
Revisions about night flying to align with information from the Civil Aerospace Medical Institute
(CAMI)
Added information about turning back to an airport after engine failure after takeoff (the impossible
turn)
An added section about emergency response systems, specifically ballistic parachutes and
Emergency Autoland (EAL) systems
As a flight instructor you should know that the General Aviation Joint Steering Committee (GAJSC) is the primary
vehicle for government-aviation community cooperation, communication and coordination on GA accident reduction.
GAJSC findings
Reveal common pilot errors
Result in recommended mitigation strategies
As an instructor you are encouraged to
Stay abreast of these findings and recommendations
Incorporate them into your flight reviews and IPCs
GA pilots are using more and more advanced technology in the cockpit including
A tablet or other handheld device often utilizing a program frequently referred to as an electronic flight bag that
among other things can display aviation charts
Examples of programs include
ForeFlight
WingX
Garmin Pilot
The panel-mount equipment found in a Technically Advanced Airplane (TAA) which by definition (61.129(j)) must
be equipped with an electronically advanced avionics system that includes at least
An electronic Primary Flight Display (PFD), which must be continuously visible, that includes at a minimum
An airspeed indicator
A turn coordinator
An attitude indicator
A heading indicator
An altimeter, and
A vertical speed indicator
An electronic Multifunction Display (MFD), which must be continuously visible, that includes at a minimum a
moving map using GPS navigation displaying the aircraft position
A two-axis autopilot integrated with the navigation and heading guidance system
An important part of the flight review or IPC should be evaluating your customer’s
Proficiency in whatever systems they use
Knowledge of system limitations
Proficiency in using automated systems and what to do if they fail
Over-confidence, complacency, or automation-bias (trusting the automated system more than their own skills)
Ability to actively manage these systems and cross-reference information from the different systems in the
aircraft
Ability to control the aircraft manually
This will help mitigate the risk of them losing control of the aircraft
Simulating an autopilot failure during approach is one way you could accomplish this
During a flight review you will of course review Part 91 with your customer.
You’ll want to tailor this review to each pilot’s particular needs
The objective is to ensure your customer can comply with all regulatory requirements and operate safely in
Various types of airspace
An appropriate range of weather conditions
You’ll want to have a broad enough review to meet the objective while providing a more comprehensive review in
those areas your customer is weaker in
Although you will ultimately decide what to cover in a flight review, the following are topics that you’ll want to include in
every review in an effort to address and reduce accident and incident trends.
Pilot deviations
Spend time on pilot deviation avoidance awareness and best practices in avoiding deviations
Automation competency
Defined as the pilot’s ability to understand and operate a given aircraft’s automated systems
Consider what automated systems your customer uses and come up with a plan to evaluate their proficiency
using these systems
Angle of Attack (AOA) systems
Heavily promoted by the FAA and the General Aviation Joint Steering Committee (GAJSC) to reduce loss of
control accidents
Loss of control is
Often the end result of a failure in risk management
The number one immediate cause of fatalities
If the airplane used in the review
Has an AOA indicator
Evaluate how your customer interprets and uses its cues
Ensure that they know how to use the AOA correctly
Does not have an AOA indicator
Emphasize the importance of angle of attack
Evaluate your customer’s general knowledge of aerodynamic principles relating to AOA
Abnormal and emergency procedures applicable to the aircraft
During the oral review evaluate your customer’s practical knowledge of recommended procedures and regulatory
requirements in the areas of (but not limited to)
Aircraft systems
Speeds
Performance
Meteorological and other hazards
Operations in controlled airspace
Abnormal and emergency procedures
During the flight portion, regardless of your customer’s experience or background, at a minimum evaluate those
maneuvers that are critical to flight safety, such as
Takeoffs
Stabilized approaches and landings
Slow flight
Stall recognition, stalls, and stall recovery
Spin recognition and avoidance
Recovery from unusual attitudes
Operating the aircraft solely by reference to instruments under actual or simulated conditions
Managing Expectations
You may find it beneficial to interview your flight review/IPC customers first to find out
The type of aircraft they fly
The type of flying they do
Their recency of experience
Something very important to consider is that a pilot who has multiple ratings only needs to take ONE flight review in
ANY of the aircraft they are rated for (61.56).
This review would count towards ALL of the aircraft they are rated for
For instance, a pilot who has a private pilot certificate with both an airplane single-engine land rating and a
rotorcraft-helicopter rating could take their flight review in either one and it would make them current for both
The exception is SFAR 73 regarding Robinson R22 and R44 helicopters, which requires that a flight review
must have been done in them specifically
As a flight instructor you may want to recommend your customers take their flight review in
The type of aircraft they fly the most
The most complex aircraft they fly
More than one category/class of aircraft, even though the regulations do not require it
Again, encourage them to get as much currency training as they need, above and beyond the minimum
requirements
Another thing to ask your customers about is the type of flying they do.
This way you can decide what maneuvers to cover during the flight review or IPC as you determine whether they
are capable to act as PIC
Recency of experience is also an important factor in developing a plan for the review and will help you manage their
expectations about how long the review will take.
Most pilots know they must complete 1 hour of ground training and 1 hour of flight training for a flight review
This can create an unrealistic expectation of spending only about 2 hours with you
We know from experience the time will be more like 4 hours
As a rule of thumb, add an additional hour for each year the pilot has not been actively flying
Be sure you let your customer know the real time involved
This way your customer will clear the allotted time and be prepared to spend that time
Flight reviews are based on meeting proficiency, not on a time requirement
Preparation:
Have your customer review Part 91
There is an excellent course provided by the FAASTeam that you can recommend your customers take to
prepare for the flight review, ALC-25: Flight Review Prep Guide
This course breaks the regulations down according to the 4 parts of PAVE – Pilot, Aircraft, enVironment,
External pressures
We don’t recommend you have your customer prepare a cross country in advance
Preparations done in advance may not give you an accurate picture of the process they use to plan a flight
The process itself is as important as the results
Have a written plan that details all the topics and maneuvers you will cover on the flight review
Let them know you will use the appropriate Airman Certification Standards (ACS) (e.g., private standards for private
pilots, commercial standards for commercial or ATP pilots) as the standard of performance, because
They’re objective
They’re industry accepted
The pilot had to meet these standards at one time
We recommend you emphasize to the pilot that the purpose of this flight review is safety
Not only their own, but also
The safety of those who fly with them
Also let them know they will need to understand how to correctly apply all relevant regulations to prevent
A mishap, and/or
FAA action against their certificate
The rapid development and use of various flight apps and online aviation marketplaces have made
interpreting the regulations regarding private pilot limitations and sharing flight expenses versus for-hire
operations (14 CFR 61.113) even more challenging.
In light of this the FAA has published additional guidance in AC 61-142, “Sharing Aircraft Operating
Expenses in Accordance with 14 CFR 61.113(c)," which your customers will find to be very helpful and
useful
One other responsibility you have as a CFI is to make sure you are current in and knowledgeable about the aircraft
you will be giving the review in.
Consider your personal qualifications for any given flight review or IPC
Get up to speed on your own recency of experience and familiarity with an aircraft’s make, model, type, and
systems (e.g. glass cockpit, autopilot) before giving the flight review
If you are not or cannot get proficient in the aircraft
Be honest about it
Decline to perform the flight review or IPC
Assist the customer in finding an experienced instructor who is well qualified to give the evaluation
For flight instructors, transition training has many similar considerations as a flight review as far as how important
this training is and what to take into account in conducting the training. You can find out more in this FAA Safety
Briefing article, “Shifting Gears: Tips for Tackling Transition Training”.
Honest Evaluation
Use Scenario-Based Training (SBT) by giving them various scenarios on the ground and in flight, which
Will give you a good idea of the depth of the pilot’s knowledge
Is the only way you will know if they truly understand the information and how to apply it
Ask them to plan a short cross-country flight and explain what they’re doing.
This gives you an opportunity to see how they plan
Remember, they may use a different system than you do
Evaluate the one they use for
Accuracy
Completeness
You should not penalize them for using automated flight planning programs
Your job is to evaluate the thoroughness of their planning, regardless of the tools they use
During the ground segment of the flight review you notice the pilot’s cross-country planning is
incomplete. He doesn’t know how to compute a magnetic heading for the flight, the weather planning
was incomplete, he didn’t have any substantial knowledge of airspace or special use airspace, and he did not check
NOTAMs or TFRs.
Some factors that may influence your evaluation during a flight review or IPC include
Are they receptive to your evaluation?
Do they acknowledge their deficiencies?
Are they receptive to your training plan?
If they don’t know some of the subject matter, do they know where to look it up?
One other thing you will need to consider is whether the customer meets the FAA Aviation English Language
Standard (AELS).
These standards
Replace what was formerly known as English Language Proficiency
Are addressed in AC 60-28B
Issued in June 2017
Flight reviews and IPCs are both evaluations of a pilot’s ability to conduct a safe flight
A lack of meeting AELS directly affects flight safety
The regulations require pilots to meet and maintain English language standards
It is not uncommon for a pilot to meet these standards when first certificated, but lose that proficiency over
time
This may particularly occur if the pilot resides in a non-English-speaking country and has not been
speaking English regularly since their initial certification
As a flight instructor you are considered to be an FAA AELS evaluator
An FAA AELS evaluator, by definition, is anyone who is authorized to conduct certification, training, testing,
or checking, or to issue an endorsement required by the regulations
During the ground segment it should become evident whether the customer meets the AELS
A pilot cannot use the privileges of their certificate if they are not proficient in the English language
As an instructor you share the responsibility to ensure the customer is proficient in the English language
If your customer does not demonstrate proficiency to the FAA standards you should
Not continue the flight review/IPC
Not sign off their flight review/IPC
Make a logbook endorsement for the training received
Let the customer know about your AELS evaluation
By doing so you may be doing them and other pilots a big favor
You may prevent a deviation or an accident
Notify their local FSDO for further action
Your job is to evaluate and notify the local FSDO if you determine a customer does not meet the AELS.
The FSDO is responsible to make the final determination and act accordingly.
As mentioned above, you can find out more about the FAA AELS in AC 60-28B, which provides you with eligibility
standards and guidance on evaluating the AELS.
If in doubt, ask yourself if you would want one of your loved ones flying with this pilot.
If not, do not endorse the flight review
Have the customer review the flight and offer self-evaluation of how they performed.
You will learn far more than if you debrief the flight
Chapter 6 of the Aviation Instructor’s Handbook provides specific suggestions for conducting the post-
flight evaluation discussion as a “collaborative critique”
If you are a CFII you also have the privilege of conducting an instrument proficiency check (IPC).
You have a great responsibility in determining if an IPC customer can operate safely in all aspects of instrument
flying
You must determine if they have the necessary
Knowledge
Skill
Ability to manage risks
This can be challenging because
You have a relatively short amount of time to evaluate the customer
As compared to preparing an applicant for an instrument rating
You may be unfamiliar with the
Customer
Aircraft and/or avionics
As discussed earlier, you will want to either get up to speed on these, or help your customer find a
more qualified CFII
The IPC probably won’t be conducted in realistic (IMC) conditions
However, you do have the option to conduct the IPC under
VFR
IFR in simulated instrument conditions, or
IFR in actual conditions
You will need to evaluate whether your customer has adequate knowledge and understanding of
Part 91, paying special attention to subparts
B, Flight Rules
C, Equipment, Instrument, and Certificate Requirements
E, Maintenance, Preventive Maintenance, and Alterations
Enroute and approach chart interpretation, including
Standard Instrument Departures (SIDs) and Standard Terminal Arrival Routes (STARs)
Climb via/descend via procedures
Pilot misunderstanding regarding altitudes, particularly on “climb via” clearances, are a significant
cause of deviations
Obstacle Departure Procedures (ODP)
Area Navigation (RNAV), GPS and WAAS procedures
Getting and interpreting weather information
Especially hazardous weather such as icing and convective activity
Aerodynamic principles relating to angle of attack (AOA) and the purpose, operation, and limitations of an AOA
indicator if installed
The following as they pertain to IFR operations
Preflight planning
Aircraft performance
NOTAM information (including TFRs)
Fuel requirements
Alternate requirements
Use of appropriate FAA publications (such as the Chart Supplement)
Aircraft systems and emergency procedures for equipment failure
Aircraft flight instruments and navigation equipment and emergency procedures for malfunction or failure
Determining the airworthiness of the aircraft, including required inspections and documents
Particularly the customer’s understanding of the additional requirements for instrument flight versus
VFR flight
ATC procedures with emphasis on ATC clearances and pilot/controller responsibilities
There are specific flight maneuvers you must evaluate during an IPC.
You can find these in the Instrument Airman Certification Standards
At the end of the Appendix titled “Practical Test Roles, Responsibilities, and Outcomes”
You’ll find a table listing the minimum tasks you must perform
You should use a scenario that incorporates as many of these tasks as possible
This helps you evaluate the customer’s risk management skills
Another thing you should emphasize is proper adherence to ATC clearances
You can also evaluate any other maneuvers at your discretion
To help you ensure that the customer can safely operate in IMC
Again, tailoring the IPC to the airspace and aircraft the customer will fly in
Regardless of the maneuvers you select, ensure that your customer has satisfactory basic attitude
instrument flying skills
You may conduct part or all of the IPC in an approved simulator, flight training device (FTD), or aviation training
device (ATD).
The Instrument ACS provides guidance on the applicability of specific devices to particular tasks
In general, advanced aviation training devices (AATDs) may be used for an IPC, but basic aviation training
devices (BATDs) may not
You should review the ATD letter of authorization (LOA) for the specific approval of that device
Just as with a flight review, have your customer offer self-evaluation at the conclusion of the IPC.
Again, Chapter 6 of the Aviation Instructor’s Handbook provides specific suggestions for conducting the post-
flight evaluation discussion as a “collaborative critique”
As with the flight review, there is an excellent course provided by the FAASTeam that you can recommend your
customers take to prepare for the IPC, ALC-38: Instrument Proficiency Check Review Guide.
Click on this article by John King to gain some useful tips you can pass on to your customers about special
considerations when making the decision whether to go on an IFR flight: “What weather conditions would cause
you to stay on the ground as an IFR-rated pilot?”
As a CFII you should also be aware of InFO15012, which clarifies when an instrument approach procedure (IAP) can
be logged for currency and training requirements.
In summary, the pilot must fly all segments of the IAP (unless they receive vectors to the final approach course)
solely by reference to instruments when flying in
Simulated instrument conditions
All the way to the minimum descent altitude (MDA) or decision altitude/decision height (DA/DH)
Actual IMC
Until transitioning from IMC to visual conditions for landing
In actual IMC they do not need to fly solely by reference to instruments all the way to the MDA or
DA/DH for the approach to count
If the flight review or IPC was successful, you need to make the endorsement required by 61.56, but don’t stop there
This is the perfect opportunity to discuss any weak areas the pilot may have
And offer a training plan to help them
It’s also an ideal opportunity to offer added ratings if applicable
You should make the endorsement for a satisfactory flight review or IPC in accordance with AC 61-65H, Certification:
Pilots and Flight and Ground Instructors.
Form 8710-1 now has fields for a flight review and IPC.
When a review is successful the FAA strongly encourages your customer to fill out an 8710-1 and you to submit it
This is not a requirement but it helps make sure the pilot’s FAA records are up-to-date
Point out that they took this flight review/IPC to see if they had any weak areas, and they were successful in finding a
few.
Now they can fix these issues and move on
Those who acknowledge their weak areas are usually very receptive to a training plan.
Those who get hostile and won’t accept your evaluation just confirmed that their ability to safely exercise their
privileges is suspect.
Offer them a training plan and offer to help
You can satisfy the requirements for your own flight review by
Completing a flight review with another instructor and receiving the endorsement
Completing a phase in the Wings program
Passing the practical test for a pilot certificate, category or class rating, or operating privilege
As of Nov. 15, 2013, passing the practical test for
A Flight Instructor certificate
An additional rating on an instructor certificate
Renewal or reinstatement of a CFI certificate
Until November 15, 2013, passing a Flight Instructor practical test did not constitute a flight review.
The FAA had previously issued a legal opinion (included in the CFI Resource Materials) in 2008 to
clarify 61.56(d), stating that the Flight Instructor Certificate is a teaching certificate, not
a pilot certificate
The FAA has now changed the rule so that an Instructor practical test does count as a flight review
If you are a flight instructor, renewing your flight instructor certificate (as you are doing by taking this
course) counts towards the one hour of ground training for your flight review.
What went wrong in the scenario we presented at the beginning of this module?
The customer was given an unrealistic expectation of how much time the flight review would take, and time was
an issue for them
The CFI didn’t have the maturity to deal with a more experienced pilot
The CFI was not experienced in conducting a flight review
The CFI wasn’t given any guidance from the school
The CFI had a momentary lapse of judgment
As you have seen, the flight review and IPC are the most important lessons you conduct as a flight instructor because
you are
Recertifying pilots to use the privileges of the their pilot certificate for the next 24 calendar months
Determining that instrument-rated pilots can operate safely in all aspects of instrument flying
While you are ultimately responsible for determining what to cover in a flight review or IPC, the FAA provides good
guidance in ACs and handbooks that you will find very useful.
You also have the responsibility to evaluate whether your customers meet the FAA Aviation English Language
Standard (AELS).
If they cannot sufficiently meet the AELS, you should not sign off on the review or IPC
When a customer
Does not successfully complete the review/IPC
Log the time as instruction
Offer additional training they may need
Successfully completes the review/IPC
Submit an 8710-1 form to the FAA
Although this is not a requirement it is highly recommended by the FAA for record keeping
Provide the appropriate logbook endorsement
Still offer additional training they may need
AC 61-98D: Currency Requirements and Guidance for the Flight Review and Instrument Proficiency Check
AC 60-28B: FAA English Language Standard for an FAA Certificate Issued Under 14 CFR Parts 61, 63, 65, and 107
AC 61-136B: FAA Approval of Aviation Training Devices and Their Use for Training and Experience
AC 91-73B: Part 91 and 135 Single Pilot, Flight School Procedures During Taxi Operations
SFAR 73
FAA Safety Briefing article: Shifting Gears: Tips for Tackling Transition Training
Instrument ACS
Article by John King: What weather conditions would cause you to stay on the ground as an IFR-rated pilot?