Untitled
Untitled
Devices
Second Edition
Ferroelectric
Devices
Second Edition
Kenji Uchino
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been
made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the valid-
ity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright
holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this
form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may
rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or uti-
lized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopy-
ing, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the
publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com (http://
www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923,
978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety of users. For
organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for
identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
TK7872.F44U24 2010
537’.244--dc22 2009030733
v
vi Contents
7.7.4
Device Applications .............................................................................207
7.7.4.1 Servo Displacement Transducers ...........................................207
7.7.4.2 Pulse-Drive Motors ................................................................208
7.8 Ultrasonic Motors ............................................................................................ 212
7.8.1 Ultrasonic Motors (USM) .................................................................... 212
7.8.2 Classification and Principles of Ultrasonic Motors ............................. 214
7.8.2.1 Standing-Wave Type .............................................................. 214
7.8.2.2 Propagating-Wave Type ......................................................... 215
7.8.3 Standing Wave–Type Motors ............................................................... 216
7.8.3.1 Rotary Motors........................................................................ 216
7.8.3.2 Linear Motors ........................................................................ 218
7.8.4 Propagating Wave–Type Motors .......................................................... 219
7.8.4.1 Linear Motors ........................................................................ 219
7.8.4.2 Rotary Motors ....................................................................... 220
7.8.4.3 Comparison of the Various Ultrasonic Motors ..................... 223
7.8.5 Smooth Impact Drive Mechanism (SIDM) .........................................224
7.9 Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting .....................................................................224
7.9.1 Piezoelectric Passive Damping to Energy Harvesting .........................224
7.9.2 High-Energy Harvesting (~W) ............................................................. 225
7.9.3 Low-Energy Harvesting (~mW) ........................................................... 227
References ................................................................................................................ 232
xi
xii Preface
Even for traditional devices, such as capacitors, piezoelectric speakers, clocks, and transformers,
old data have been updated with an eye to the future.
This edition is a more complete book; in addition to the chapter summaries, example problems,
and chapter problems,
have been newly inserted in every chapter. Over the years, all of these had accumulated in my
notebook, courtesy of students’ feedback and comments. These three additions will help the
reader correctly understand the essence of this book. Furthermore, due to strong requests by junior
instructors, model solutions have been added for the check point and chapter problems in a separate
solutions manual. I usually use check points for quizzes, example problems for homework, and
chapter problems for mid-term and final exams. I hope this will make it easier for the instructor to
prepare exam and homework problems.
Most errors in mathematical formulas, English expressions, and typos have been completely
revised and fixed in this edition.
This book was written for graduate students, undergraduate junior and senior levels, and industry
engineers studying or working in the fields of electronic materials, optical materials and communi-
cations, precision machinery, and robotics. Although this book is designed as a course with thirty
75-min lectures, readers can learn by themselves aided by the examples and problems.
For those who seek more detailed information on smart piezoelectric actuators and sensors,
Micromechatronics by K. Uchino and the late Jayne R. Giniewicz, published by CRC/Dekker in
2003, is recommended. Further, FEM and Micromechatronics with ATILA Software, published by
CRC Press in 2008, is a perfect manual for practical device designing.
Even though I am the sole author of this book, it includes the contributions of many others.
I express my gratitude to my ICAT center faculty members who have generously given me their
advice and help during the writing, particularly Professor Uma Belegundu at Lock Haven University,
who worked out all the problems. Specific acknowledgment and condolences are also dedicated to
my former student at Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Professor Jayne Giniewicz, who reviewed
and criticized the entire manuscript and made linguistic corrections, but passed away unexpectedly
at a very young age. Finally, my wife Michiko’s constant assistance is greatly appreciated with my
deepest love.
Critical review and corrections to this book will be highly appreciated. Send your feedback
directly to Kenji Uchino at 134 Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA 16802-4800; fax: 814-863-6734; e-mail: [email protected].
Kenji Uchino
Suggested Teaching Schedule
(75 min × 30 times per semester)
xiii
Prerequisite Knowledge
In order to understand ferroelectric devices, some prerequisite knowledge is expected. Try to solve
the following questions without seeing the answers on the next page.
Q1 Describe the definitions of elastic stiffness c and compliance s, using a stress X–strain
x relation.
Q2 Indicate a shear stress X4 on the following square.
Q3 Describe the sound velocity v in a material with mass density ρ and elastic compliance sE.
Q4 Calculate the capacitance C of a capacitor with area S and electrode gap t filled with a material
of relative permittivity ε.
Q5 Calculate the polarization P of a material with dipole density N (m−3) of dipole moment
qu (C m).
Q6 Describe the Curie–Weiss law of relative permittivity ε, using a Curie–Weiss temperature T0
and a Curie–Weiss constant C.
Q7 Describe the light velocity in a material with a refractive index n (c: light velocity in
vacuum).
Q8 Indicate the work function in the following energy band of a metal:
Vacuum level
Energy
Fermi level
Inside
of metal Outside
Q9 There is a voltage supply with an internal impedance Z 0. Indicate the external impedance Z1
to obtain the maximum output power.
Q10 Calculate the induced polarization P under an external stress X in a piezoelectric with a piezo-
electric constant d.
xv
xvi Prerequisite Knowledge
ANSWERS
(Correct rate more than 60% of the full score is expected)
Q1 X = cx, x = sX
Q2 X4 = 2X23 = 2φ (rad)
X4
φ
Vacuum level
Work
function
Energy
Fermi level
Inside
Outside
of metal
Q9 Z1 = Z 0
On Z1, the current and voltage are given as V/(Z 0 + Z1) and [Z1/(Z 0 + Z1)]V, leading to the
power:
Power = V 2 Z1/(Z 0 + Z1)2 = V 2/(Z 0 / Z1 + Z1 )2 ≤ (1/4)V 2/Z 0
The maximum is obtained when Z0 / Z1 = Z1 . Hence, Z1 = Z 0.
Z0
V Z1
xvii
List of Symbols
c Elastic stiffness
C Curie–Weiss constant
D Electric displacement
d, g Piezoelectric coefficients
E Electric field
g Secondary electro-optic coefficient
G1 Gibbs elastic energy
k Electromechanical coupling factor
M, Q Electrostrictive coefficients
n Refractive index
p Pyroelectric coefficient
P Dielectric polarization
Ps Spontaneous polarization
r Primary electro-optic coefficient
s Elastic compliance
T0 Curie–Weiss temperature
TC Curie temperature (phase transition temperature)
v Sound velocity
x Strain
X Stress
xs Spontaneous strain
α Ionic polarizability
γ Lorentz factor
Γ Phase retardation
ε Relative permittivity
ε0 Vacuum permittivity
η Energy transmission coefficient
μ Dipole moment
xix
1 General View of Ferroelectrics
Let us start with the “smartness” of a material. Table 1.1 lists the various effects relating the input
(electric field, magnetic field, stress, heat, and light) with the output (charge/current, magnetiza-
tion, strain, temperature, and light). Conducting and elastic materials, which generate current and
strain outputs, respectively, for the input voltage or stress (well-known phenomena), are sometimes
called “trivial” materials. On the other hand, pyroelectric and piezoelectric materials, which gen-
erate an electric field with the input of heat and stress (unexpected phenomena), respectively, are
called “smart” materials. These off-diagonal couplings have corresponding converse effects, the
electrocaloric and converse piezoelectric effects, and both “sensing” and “actuating” functions can
be realized in the same materials. “Intelligent” materials must possess a “drive/control” or “pro-
cessing” function which is adaptive to changes in environmental conditions, in addition to actuator
and sensing functions. Ferroelectric materials exhibit most of these effects with the exception of the
magnetic phenomena. Thus, ferroelectrics are said to be very “smart” materials.
Ferroelectrics are utilized in various devices such as high-permittivity dielectrics, pyroelectric sen-
sors, piezoelectric devices, electro-optic devices, and positive temperature coefficient (PTC) of resistiv-
ity components. However, ferroelectric devices often fail to be commercialized in areas of application
where competitive materials exist. Light sensors, for example, typically are manufactured from semi-
conductive materials which are superior to ferroelectrics in response speed and sensitivity. Magnetic
devices are much more popular for memory applications, and liquid crystals are typically used for opti-
cal displays. One reason for this is due to the lack of systematic and comprehensive compilation of
knowledge on ferroelectric materials. In this chapter, we will learn the fundamentals of ferroelectricity.
ε = n2 (1.1)
is valid only when the applied electric field has a frequency on the order of THz or higher. Permanent
dipole reorientation can follow only frequencies from megahertz (MHz) to GHz (106 –109 cycle/s).
This is why ferroelectric materials with permanent dipoles cannot be used for microwave dielectric
materials; their permittivity is typically high at low frequencies (kHz), but decreases significantly
with increasing applied electric field frequency. Frequency dependence of the total polarizability (or
permittivity) is depicted in Figure 1.2.
1
2 Ferroelectric Devices
TABLE 1.1
Various Effects in Materials
Photovoltaic Refractive
Light Photostriction ___
effect index
Compared with air-filled capacitors, dielectric capacitors can store more electric charge due to
the dielectric polarization P as shown in Figure 1.3. The physical quantity corresponding to the
stored electric charge per unit area is called the electric displacement D, and is related to the electric
field E by the following expression:
D = ε0 E + P = εε 0 E. (1.2)
Here,
ε0 is the vacuum permittivity (=8.854 × 10 −12 F/m)
ε is the material’s relative permittivity (also simply called permittivity or dielectric constant, and
in general is a tensor property)
E=0 E
Electronic
+ – +
polarization –
Ionic
polarization + – + + – +
– +
– + – + – + – + –+ – +
Dipole + –
reorientation – +
+ – – + – + – + – + – +
+ –
αionic
αelectronic
–
–σf – – – – – –
+ + + + +σb
+
– – – – –
Dielectric
E + + + + +
– – – – –
–σb
+σf + + + + + +
σt = σb + σf
+
Depending on the crystal structure, the centers of the positive and negative charges may not
coincide even without the application of an external electric field. Such crystals are said to possess
a spontaneous polarization. When the spontaneous polarization of the dielectric is reversed by an
electric field, it is called ferroelectric.
Not every dielectric is a ferroelectric. Crystals can be classified into 32 point groups according to
their crystallographic symmetry, and these point groups can be divided into two classes, one with a
center of symmetry and the other without as indicated in Table 1.2. There are 21 point groups which
do not have a center of symmetry. In crystals belonging to 20 of these point groups [point group
(432) being the sole exception], positive and negative charges are generated on the crystal surfaces
when appropriate stresses are applied. These materials are known as piezoelectrics.
Pyroelectricity is the phenomenon in which, due to the temperature dependence of the sponta-
neous polarization, a change in temperature of the crystal produces electric charges on the surface
of the crystal corresponding to the change of spontaneous polarization. Among the pyroelectric
crystals, those whose spontaneous polarization can be reversed by an electric field (not exceeding
the breakdown limit of the crystal) are called ferroelectrics. There is some experimental ambigu-
ity in this definition. In establishing ferroelectricity, it is necessary to apply an electric field to a
pyroelectric material and experimentally ascertain the polarization reversal.
4 Ferroelectric Devices
TABLE 1.2
Crystallographic Classification according to Crystal Centrosymmetry
and Polarity
Crystal System
Centro
(11) m3m m3 6/mmm 6/m 4/mmm 4/m 3m 3 mmm 2/m 1
Nonpolar
(22) 432 622 422
23 6 4 32 222
Noncentro 43m 6m2 42m
(21)
Polar 2
(pyroelectric) 6mm 6 4mm 4 3m 3 mm2 1
(10) m
FIGURE 1.4 Some possible eigen lattice vibration modes in a perovskite crystal. (a) Initial symmetric cubic,
(b) symmetrically elongated, (c) coherently shifted centre cations, and (d) antipolarized shift of the centre
cations.
General View of Ferroelectrics 5
+ + + Equipotential
– – –
E-line
r1
+ pi
ri –
E0
+ + +
– – – Dielectric material
FIGURE 1.5 Concept of the local field. Eloc is given by E loc = E0 + ∑ i [3(pi ⋅ ri )ri − ri2 pi ]/4πε 0 ri5 .
are distorted without generating dipole moments (acoustic mode). On the other hand, when
Figure 1.4c or d is stabilized, dipole moments are generated (optical mode). The final stabilized
states Figure 1.4c and d correspond to ferroelectric and antiferroelectric states, respectively. If
this particular mode becomes stabilized, with decreasing temperature, the vibration mode fre-
quency decreases (soft phonon mode), and finally at a certain phase transition temperature this
frequency becomes zero.
It follows that, at any individual A ion site, there exists a local field from the surrounding polar-
ization P, even if there is no external field. The concept of the local field is shown schematically in
Figure 1.5. It can be shown that
This local field is the driving force for the ion shift. Here γ is called the Lorentz factor. For an
isotropic cubic system, it is known that γ = 1.1 ε0 is the permittivity of vacuum and is equal to 8.854 ×
10 −12 F/m. If the ionic polarizability of ion A is α, then the dipole moment of the unit cell of this
crystal is
Furthermore, when the A ions are displaced from their nonpolar equilibrium positions, the elastic
energy also increases. If the displacement is u, and the force constants are k and k¢, then the increase
of the elastic energy per unit volume can be expressed as
Wdip Welas
P
(a) (b)
Wtot
P
(c)
FIGURE 1.6 Energy explanation of the origin of spontaneous polarization. (a) Dipole interaction:
Wdip = – (Nag2/9e 02 )P2. (b) Elastic energy: Welas = (k ¢/2Nq2 )P2 + (k/4N3 q4 )P4. (c) Total energy: Wtot = Wdip + Welas.
Here, k¢ (>0) is the higher order force constant. It should be noted that in pyroelectrics, k¢ plays
an important role in determining the magnitude of the dipole moment. By rewriting Equation 1.7
using
P = Nqu, (1.8)
where q is the electric charge, and combining with Equation 1.6, the total energy can be expressed
as follows (see Figure 1.6):
Wtot = Wdip + Welas
From this, one can see that if the coefficient of the harmonic term of the elastic energy is equal to or
greater than the coefficient of the dipole–dipole coupling, then P = 0; the A ions are stable and remain at
the nonpolar equilibrium positions. Otherwise, a shift from the equilibrium position (P2 = [(2Nαγ 2/9ε02)
− (k/Nq2)]/[k¢/N 3q4]) is stable. Spontaneous polarization can occur more easily in perovskite type crys-
tal structure (e.g., barium titanate, BT) due to a higher value of Lorenz factor γ (=10)2 than that of other
crystal structures. Note also that the polarizability is sensitive to temperature, leading to the phase tran-
sition. Suppose that the ionic polarizability of ion A, α, increases with decreasing temperature, even if
[(k/2Nq2) − (Nαγ 2/9ε02)] > 0 (paraelectric) at a high temperature, this value may become negative with
decreasing temperature, leading to a ferroelectric phase transition. Considering a first approximation,
a linear relation of the α with temperature, that is, the well-known Curie–Weiss law:
can be derived. This equation will be discussed again in detail in Section 2.2.2.
0.061 å
Ti4+ O2–
Ba2+
Ba2+ 0.036 å
Ti4+ 0.12 å
O2–
Solution
The dipole moment is calculated by taking the product of the charge magnitude and its
displacement. The total dipole moment in a unit cell is calculated by summing the Ba2+, Ti4+,
O2− related dipoles (notice the fractional contribution of each atom, i.e., 1/8 for corner atoms and
1/2 for face-centered atoms)
= 0.674 × 10 −10 e m
_ 29
= 1.08 × 10 C m, (P1.1.1)
The spontaneous polarization is defined as the polarization (total dipole moment) per unit
volume:
= 0.17C/m 2. (P1.1.3)
– + – + – + – +
δ1 δ2 δ1 δ2
(a) (b)
FIGURE 1.8 Microscopic explanation of the (a) piezoelectric strain and (b) electrostriction.
Generally speaking, the word electrostriction is used in a general sense to describe elec-
tric-field-induced strain, and hence frequently also implies the “converse piezoelectric effect.”
However, in solid-state theory, the converse piezoelectric effect is defined as a primary elec-
tromechanical coupling effect, that is, the strain is proportional to the electric field, while elec-
trostriction is a secondary coupling in which the strain is proportional to the square of the electric
field. Thus, strictly speaking, they should be distinguished. However, the piezoelectricity of a
ferroelectric, which has a centrosymmetric prototype (high temperature) phase, is considered to
originate from the electrostrictive interaction, and hence the two effects are related. The above
phenomena hold strictly under the assumptions that the object material is a monodomain single
crystal and that its state does not change under the application of an electric field. In a practi-
cal piezoelectric ceramic, additional strains accompanied by the reorientation of ferroelectric
domains are also important.
Why a strain is induced by an electric field is explained herewith.3 For simplicity, let us consider
an ionic crystal such as NaCl. Figure 1.8a and b shows a one-dimensional (1-D) rigid-ion spring
model of the crystal lattice. The springs represent equivalently the cohesive force resulting from
the electrostatic Coulomb energy and the quantum mechanical repulsive energy. Figure 1.8b shows
the centrosymmetric case, whereas Figure 1.8a shows the more general noncentrosymmetric case.
In Figure 1.8b, the springs joining the ions are all the same, whereas in Figure 1.8a, the springs
joining the ions are different for the longer and shorter ionic distances; in other words, hard
and soft springs existing alternately are important. Next, consider the state of the crystal lattice
Figure 1.8a under an applied electric field. The cations are drawn in the direction of the electric
field and the anions in the opposite direction, leading to the relative change in the interionic
distance. Depending on the direction of the electric field, the soft spring expands or contracts
more than the contraction or expansion of the hard spring, causing a strain x (a unit cell length
change) in proportion to the electric field E. This is the converse piezoelectric effect. When
expressed as
x = dE, (1.11)
the proportionality constant d is called the piezoelectric constant.
On the other hand, in Figure 1.8b, the amounts of extension and contraction of the spring
are nearly the same, and the distance between the two cations (lattice parameter) remains
almost the same, hence, there is no strain. However, more precisely, ions are not connected by
such idealized springs (those are called harmonic springs, in which force (F) = spring constant
General View of Ferroelectrics 9
(k) × displacement (Δ) holds). In most cases, the springs possess anharmonicity (F = k1Δ − k2Δ2),
that is, they are somewhat easy to extend but hard to contract. Such subtle differences in the dis-
placement causes a change in the lattice parameter, producing a strain which is independent of the
direction of the applied electric field (+E or −E), and hence is an even function of the electric field.
This is called the electrostrictive effect and can be expressed as
x = ME 2 , (1.12)
P = dX . (1.13)
Strain ΔI/I
×10–3 ×10–3
4 1
Strain ΔI/I
3 0.75
2 0.5
1 0.25
FIGURE 1.9 Typical strain curves for a piezoelectric PZT-based ceramic (a) and an electrostrictive
PMN-based ceramic (b).
10 Ferroelectric Devices
(a) Calculate the induced strain under an applied electric field of E3 = 10 × 105 V/m. Then,
calculate the generative stress under a completely clamped condition.
(b) Calculate the induced electric field under an applied stress of X3 = 3 × 107 N/m2. The
induced field does not coincide with the above-mentioned 10 × 105 V/m. Explain the rea-
son, taking account of electromechanical coupling factor k.
Hint
We will introduce the tensor quantities in Chapter 2. However, try to solve the problems by
neglecting the subscripts at the moment, in order to make the reader understand the concept of
electromechanical coupling factor k.
x = dE, (P1.2.1)
P = dX , (P1.2.2)
and
Solution
_
(a) x3 = d3 E3 = (590 × 10 12
C/N)(10 × 10 5 V/m)
_
= 5.9 × 10 4. (P1.2.4)
_ _12
X3 = x3 /s33 = 5.9 × 10 4/ 20 × 10 m 2 /N
_
E3 = P3 /ε 0 ε 3 = (1.77 × 10 −2 C/m 2 )/(3400 × 8.854 × 10 12
F/m)
The induced field is only 59% of the field in the case of (a); this is explainable by the electrome-
chanical coupling factor k. When electric energy is supplied to a piezoelectric sample and some
part is transduced into mechanical energy, the electromechanical coupling factor k is defined by
= d 2/sε 0 ε. (P1.2.8)
General View of Ferroelectrics 11
On the other hand, when mechanical energy is supplied to the sample and some part is trans-
duced into electrical energy, k is also defined (notice the same result) by
= d 2 /sε 0 ε. (P1.2.9)
2
k33 = d33
2
/s33ε 0 ε 3
= 0.58. (P1.2.10)
The reason why the induced field in (b) is about k2 of the 10 × 105 V/m of (a) is this transduction
ratio; that is, each energy transduction ratio accompanying the E → M and M → E processes
is k2. Thus (last electrical energy)/(initial electrical energy) = k 4, leading to (last induced field)/
(initial applied field) = k2.
ε = n2 . (1.14)
When an external electric field is applied to the crystal, ion displacement is induced, deforming the
shape of the electron cloud, and consequently the refractive index is changed. This phenomenon is
called the electro-optic effect.
Generally, the refractive index is treated as a symmetrical second-rank tensor quantity and is
represented geometrically by the optical indicatrix which is described by
x 2 y2 z2
2
+ 2 + 2 = 1, (1.15)
n1 n2 n3
where n1, n2, and n3 are the principal refractive indices. With the application of an electric field, the
change in refractive index is given by a Taylor expansion expression in terms of E:
Here n(E) and n(0) are the refractive indices at E and zero field, respectively, and rijk is the pri-
mary electro-optic coefficient (Pockels effect) and Rijkl is the secondary coefficient (Kerr effect).
Remember that the expansion is not based on nij, but on 1/n2ij.
12 Ferroelectric Devices
Considering the paraelectric phase of a perovskite crystal (m3 m) as an example, the Kerr coef-
ficients are represented in the following matrix:
so that the refractive indicatrix under an electric field applied along the z-direction is expressed as
x 2 + y2 z2
2
+ 2
= 1. (1.17)
⎡ ⎛ n2 ⎞ ⎤ ⎡ ⎛ n2 ⎞ ⎤
n ⎢1 − ⎜ 0 ⎟ R12 Ez2 ⎥
2
0 n ⎢1 − ⎜ 0 ⎟ R11Ez2 ⎥
2
0
⎣⎢ ⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎥⎦ ⎣⎢ ⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎥⎦
The refractive index change under an external electric field is explained intuitively as follows. When
an electric field Ez is applied to a cubic perovskite crystal, the crystal is elongated along the z-axis
and contracted along both the x- and y-axes. Consequently, the material’s density or compactness
will be decreased along the z-axis and densified along the x- and y-axes, leading to a decrease in
the refractive index nz and an increase of the indices nx and ny, as shown in Figure 1.10 (sphere
becomes a doughnut-shape). Note that the refractive index is proportional to the electron density
or ion compactness along the polarized light electric field direction which is perpendicular to the
light propagation direction. Taking into account the above description, R11 and R12 in Equation 1.16
should be positive and negative, respectively, in this perovskite structure.
When light is transmitted along the y-direction, the phase retardation Γy between the ordinary
(polarized along the x orientation) and extraordinary waves (polarized along the z orientation) is
given by (refer to Figure 1.11)
z
nz
y
ny
nx
x
FIGURE 1.10 Refractive indicatrix change of a cubit crystal with electric field (Kerr effect) (left). An origi-
nal sphere becomes a doughnut shape. Perovskite unit cell change with electric field (right).
General View of Ferroelectrics 13
Unpolarized light
+ L
45° ne
n0 d
Polarizer
–45°
Electro-optic crystal
Polarizer
FIGURE 1.11 Optical phase retardation through an electro-optic crystal. Notice the crossed polarizer
configuration.
where
d is the electrode gap
L is the optical path length
Placing the crystal between crossed polarizers arranged at an angle of 45° (one +45° and the other
−45°) with respect to the z-axis, the output light intensity is modulated as a function of applied
voltage according to
This is the principle behind the operation of a light shutter/valve, and the voltage required for the
first intensity maximum (i.e., Γy = π) is an important characteristic called the half-wave voltage. The
detailed derivation process is given in Example Problem 1.3.
x 2 + y2 z2
2
+ 2
= 1. (P1.3.1)
⎡ ⎛ n2 ⎞ ⎤ ⎡ ⎛ n2 ⎞ ⎤
n ⎢1 − ⎜ 0 ⎟ R12 E2z ⎥
2
0 n ⎢1 − ⎜ 0 ⎟ R11E2z ⎥
2
0
⎣⎢ ⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎥⎦ ⎣⎢ ⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎥⎦
The output light intensity is reduced twice, once at the inlet and once again at the outlet crystal
surfaces by a factor of (1 − Re)2.
14 Ferroelectric Devices
Also you should notice that the incident light (after passing through the first polarizer) has
ordinary and extraordinary light components of equal magnitudes, because of 45° cant angle of
the polarizer.
Solution
In a cubic structure, the refractive index change under an external electric field along z-axis is
expressed by the following two equations:
λ z = λ 0 /nz , (P1.3.6)
λ x = λ 0 /nx , (P1.3.7)
where λ0 is the vacuum wavelength of the incident light, and the waves existing in the crystal
with an optical pathlength of L are L/λz and L/λx, respectively, the phase difference between
these waves (retardation Γy) is given by
Γ y = 2π(L /λ x − L /λ z ) = (2π /λ 0 )L Δn
⎛ ⎡⎛ 2π ⎞ ⎤⎞
⎜ sin ⎢⎜ ⎟ y − ωt ⎥⎟
⎛ ex ⎞ ⎜ ⎣⎝ λ 0 ⎠ ⎦⎟
⎜⎝ e ⎟⎠ = l0 ⎜ . (P1.3.9)
⎡⎛ 2π ⎞ ⎤⎟
z
⎜ sin ⎢ ⎟
⎜⎝ ⎜ ⎟ y − ωt ⎥ ⎟
⎣⎝ λ 0 ⎠ ⎦⎠
Note here that the 45° arrangement generates the same electric field amplitude along x- and
z-directions, and that the relationship I = e2/2, i.e., the intensity is an average of e2 in terms of
time. Third, the output light from the PLZT can be described as
⎛ ⎡⎛ 2π ⎞ ⎤ ⎞
⎜ sin ⎢⎜ ⎟ y − ωt + φ⎥ ⎟
⎛ ex ⎞ ⎜ ⎣⎝ λ 0 ⎠ ⎦ ⎟
⎜⎝ e ⎟⎠ = (1 − Re ) l0 ⎜
2
. (P1.3.10)
⎡ ⎤⎟
z
⎜ sin ⎢⎛ 2π ⎞ y − ωt + φ − Γ y ⎥⎟
⎜⎝ ⎜ ⎟ ⎟
⎣⎝ λ 0 ⎠ ⎦⎠
General View of Ferroelectrics 15
Remember to consider two reflections on the front and backside of the PLZT sample. Also,
basically the extraordinary ray speed corresponding to output ez is faster than the ordinary ray
speed (ex), leading to the phase delay of Γy in ez when we consider the optical pathlength L.
Fourth, through the polarizer arranged at the −45° orientation, the electric field component in
this direction e−45cant is represented (taking into account the electric field vector projection on this
−45° orientation) by
l0
ex / 2 − ez / 2 = (1 − Re) {sin[(2π /λ 0 )y − ωt + φ] − sin[(2π /λ 0 )y − ωt + φ − Γ y ]}
2
l0
= (1 − Re) [(1 − cos Γ y ) sin[(2π /λ 0 )y − ωt + φ]
2
+ sin Γ y cos[(2π /λ 0 )y − ωt + φ]. (P1.3.11)
Thus, finally, the output intensity through the 2nd polarizer (−45° cant) is obtained from the
2
relation I = e−45cant /2:
⎛ 1 − cos Γ y ⎞
= (1 − Re)2 I 0 ⎜ ⎟⎠ .
(P1.3.12)
⎝ 2
Figure 1.12 shows the output intensity I as a function of applied voltage Vz, which exhibits maxi-
mum and minimum successively. The half-wave voltage, which is defined as the voltage required
to exhibit the first maximum in the transmitted light intensity, is given from the condition, cos Γy
= −1 or Γy = π. When we use a sample with Kerr (secondary) electro-optic effect, Γy is expressed
by Equation P1.3.8, and the half-wave voltage can be obtained as
λ0
Vz,λ /2 = d . (P1.3.13)
Ln03 ( R11 − R12 )
The intensity maxima can be sequentially obtained on increasing the applied voltage. Notice that
these half-wave, one-and-a-half-wave, two-and-a-half-wave voltages are not arranged linearly,
due to the nonlinear electro-optic effect.
This is a demo with two polarizers by changing the angle between two. The reader is expected to
understand the polarized light characteristics (Figure 1.13).
Light
intensity
(1–Re)2 I0
FIGURE 1.12 Variation in the light intensity of a Kerr-effect electro-optic shutter with applied voltage.
16 Ferroelectric Devices
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
FIGURE 1.13 Demo with a pair of optical polarizers by changing the angle. (a) 0°, (b) 30°, (c) 60°, and
(d) 90° angles.
(a) (b)
(c)
FIGURE 1.14 Demo with a pair of optical polarizers by changing the angle, sandwiching a Scotch tape.
(a) 0°, (b) 90°, and (c) 45° angles.
Scotch tape is different from other manufacturers’ products. A Scotch tape is sandwiched by a
pair of polarizers. Dark and bright conditions are reversed in comparison with Lab Demo 1.1,
as demonstrated in Figure 1.14a and b. When the analyzer (second polarizer) is arranged along
the tape extended direction, no interference is observed. This is the basis for understanding the
birefringence and retardation of the inserted optical material between a pair of polarizers.
Comments
Scotch tape is manufactured by stretching the tape, so that the refractive index along the tape is
different from that of the width direction. This birefringence and the optical pathlength (tape thick-
ness) generate accidentally the retardation Γy of π (refer to Equation P1.3.8). This situation exhibits
the above-mentioned “Scotch tape” magic. By inserting an electro-optic PLZT (replacing Scotch
tape) and inducing the birefringence with electric field, a similar dark and bright conversion can
be introduced in a PLZT light valve.
General View of Ferroelectrics 17
ε = C /(T − T0 ), (1.20)
Ti4+
Ba2+
O2–
T > TC T < TC
FIGURE 1.15 Crystal structures of BaTiO3: Higher than TC (left) and lower than TC (right).
18 Ferroelectric Devices
Permittivity ε
Spontaneous PS
(c) Pyrosensor
T0 TC
Temperature
(Curie temp.)
FIGURE 1.16 Temperature dependence of the spontaneous polarization and permittivity in a ferroelectric
material. (a)–(f) indicate the temperature ranges for each application.
where
C is the Curie–Weiss constant
T0 is the Curie–Weiss temperature
xS = QPS2 , (1.21)
and xS decreases almost linearly with increasing temperature. In the case of BaTiO3, it exhibits the
piezoelectric effect in the ferroelectric phase, while in the paraelectric phase, it is nonpiezoelectric
and exhibits only the electrostrictive effect.
If the above consideration is rephrased from the application viewpoints, the Curie temperature
for capacitor materials is designed to set around RT; TC for memory materials around 100°C higher
than RT; TC for pyrosensors just above RT; TC for piezoelectric transducers typically much higher
than RT, higher than 200°C; TC for electro-optic and electrostrictive devices are lower than RT to
use their paraelectric state. In other words, we will design practical materials with their Curie points
suitable for each application.
With decreasing temperature from RT, however, BT undergoes a series of complicated phase
transitions. Figure 1.17 illustrates these successive phase transitions.
1.5.2 PZT
PZT solid solution systems were discovered in 1954 by Japanese researchers, Gen Shirane, Etsuro
Sawaguchi et al. However, the enormous piezoelectric properties were discovered by B. Jaffe, Clevite
Corporation, and Clevite took the most important PZT patent for transducer applications. Because
General View of Ferroelectrics 19
Ps Ps Ps
Dielectric constant
10,000
5,000 εa
εc
0
–150 –100 –50 0 50 100 150
Temperature (°C)
of this strong basic patent, Japanese ceramic companies were encouraged actually to develop ter-
nary systems to overcome the performance, and more importantly, to escape from the Clevite’s
patent; that is, PZT + a complex perovskite such as Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3 (Matsushita Panasonic),
Pb(Ni1/3Nb2/3)O3 (NEC), and Pb(Zn1/3Nb2/3)O3 (Toshiba), which are the basic compositions in recent
years. The performance details are discussed in Chapter 7.
(CH2CF2)n
Carbon
Fluoride
z Hydrogen
Portable communication devices such as cordless, portable, and car telephones have become
popular worldwide. The reader is requested to identify what kind of ferroelectric and dielectric
components are used in a cellular phone. An old design phone is dismantled to see reasonably
large components (Figure 1.19).
Comments
Chip monolithic ceramic capacitors
Microwave oscillators
Microwave filters
Chip monolithic LC filters
Ceramic resonators
High-frequency surface acoustic wave (SAW) filters
Ceramic filters
Piezoelectric receivers
Piezoelectric speakers
Recent designs include ferroelectric memory, piezoactuators for camera autozoom/focus
mechanisms.
General View of Ferroelectrics 21
Chapter Essentials
1. Category:
Dielectrics > Piezoelectrics > Pyroelectrics > Ferroelectrics
2. Ferroelectric materials are very promising for a variety of applications:
High-permittivity capacitors
Ferroelectric memories
Pyroelectric sensors, electrocaloric fridges
Piezoelectric/electrostrictive transducers, piezoelectric energy harvesting
Electro-optic devices
PTC thermistors
3. Origin of spontaneous polarization:
Dipole coupling with the local field—driving force of ionic displacement
Elastic anharmonic term—impeding ionic displacement
4. Field-induced strains:
Piezoelectric strain—x = dE in an asymmetric crystal
Strain associated with polarization reorientations
Electrostriction—x = ME2 in a symmetric crystal
Piezostriction: the difference of the harmonic term of the two equivalent springs
Electrostriction: anharmonicity of the equivalent springs
5. Electro-optic effect: refractive index change with an external electric field. The secondary
Kerr effect is frequently used. Devices making use of this effect require a pair of crossed
polarizers arranged at a 45° angle with respect to the electric field direction.
Half-wave voltage: minimum voltage required for an electro-optic crystal to exhibit the first
maximum light intensity.
Check Point
1. There are three microscopic origins of polarization: electronic polarization, ionic polariza-
tion, and [— (a)]. Fill in the blank.
2. The local field is the driving force for the spontaneous polarization. How is γ called, which
enhances the applied electric field E.
22 Ferroelectric Devices
3. (T/F) Taking into account a famous relation between the relative permittivity ε and the
refractive index n: ε = n2, we can obtain n = 4 for the crystal with ε = 16 (at 1 kHz). Is this
argument true or false?
4. The randomly oriented light passed through a polarizer. When we neglect the light absorp-
tion by the polarizer, what percentage of the light intensity can we obtain from the polar-
izer in comparison with the input intensity?
5. (T/F) The definition of Pockels electro-optic coefficient r1jk is given by an expansion expres-
sion: 1/nij ( E ) − 1/nij (0) = Σrijk Ek . True or False ?
6. (T/F) The Curie temperature of a capacitor ferroelectric material should be around RT.
True or False?
7. (T/F) The Curie temperature of a piezoelectric transducer material should be 100°C lower
than RT. True or False?
8. (T/F) The Curie temperature of a pyroelectric sensor material should be 200°C higher than
RT. True or False?
9. Provide a name of a representative polymer piezoelectric.
10. Provide a full expression of PZT.
Chapter Problems
1.1 Consider a 1-D infinite chain of two kinds of ions +q and −q, arranged alternately over
a distance a. Calculate the Coulombic potential energy at one +q ion, and obtain the
Madelung energy (Figure 1.20).
Hint
+q –q
Integrate-circuit complexity
Transistors
per die
1010 1965 Actual data 4G
1G2G
109 MOS Arrays MOS Logic 1975 actual data 512M
256M
128M ItaniumTM
108 1975 Projection 64M Pentium4â
Memory 16M PentiumIIIâ
107 4M
Microprocessor 1M PentiumIIâ
106 256K Pentiumâ
1486TM
64K
105 1386TM
4K 80286
104 16K 8086
1K
8008
103 4004
102
101
100
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
FIGURE 1.21 Gordon Moore’s Law. (Courtesy of Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, http://www.intel.com/
technology/mooreslaw.)
Questions
(a) In order to realize the above requirements (1) and (2), what sort of ferroelectric
devices should be developed? Consider these “Needs-pull” development strategies.
(b) What other ferroelectric applications can be considered, relating to “integrated-
circuit complexity?”
1.4 Expanding Lab Demo 1.3, collect more detailed information on practical designs of
multilayer capacitors (how small size?), SAW filters (what frequency?), speakers and
microphones (operation frequency range difference among speakers and microphones),
memories (flush or ferroelectric memories?), and piezoactuators in the recent cel-
lular phones. Note that the development of phone camera modules is remarkable in
particular.
REFERENCES
1. C. Kittel: Introduction to Solid State Physics, 6th edn., Chap. 13, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1986).
2. W. Kinase, Y. Uemura and M. Kikuchi: J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 30, 441 (1969).
3. K. Uchino and S. Nomura: Bull. Jpn. Appl. Phys., 52, 575 (1983); K. Uchino, S. Nomura, L. E. Cross, R.
E. Newnham and S. J. Jang: Electrostrictive effect in perovskites and its transducer applications, J. Mater.
Sci., 16, 569 (1981).
4. K. Uchino: Electrostrictive actuators: materials and applications, Bull. Am. Ceram. Soc., 65(4), 647
(1986).
5. Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, http://www.intel.com/technology/mooreslaw/
General View of Ferroelectrics
Kittel: C. Introduction to Solid State Physics, 6th edn., Chap. 13, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1986).
Kinase, W. Uemura Y. . and Kikuchi: M. J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 30, 441 (1969).
Uchino K. and Nomura: S. Bull. Jpn. Appl. Phys., 52, 575 (1983);
Uchino: K. Electrostrictive actuators: materials and applications, Bull. Am. Ceram. Soc., 65(4), 647 (1986).
Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA , http://www.intel.com/technology/mooreslaw/
High-Permittivity Dielectrics
Murata Catalog: Miracle Stones .
K. Utsumi: Private communication at 4th US-Japan Seminar on Dielectrics & Piezoelectric Ceramics (1989).
H. Kishi: Mater. Integr., 19(3), 47–51 (2006).
K. Utsumi , Y. Shimada , T. Ikeda , and H. Takamizawa: Ferroelectrics, 68, 157 (1986).
T. Suzuki , K. Morito , and Y. Iwazaki: ISIF 2005 Proceedings (2006).
K. Uchino , L. E. Cross , R. E. Newnham , and S. Nomura: J. Phase Transit., 1, 333 (1980).
W. Känzig : Helv. Phys. Acta, 24, 175 (1951).
B. N. Rolov: Fiz.Tverdogo Tela, 6, 2128 (1963).
K. Uchino , J. Kuwata , S. Nomura , L. E. Cross , and R. E. Newnham: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 20(Suppl. 20–4),
171 (1981).
H. B. Krause , J. M. Cowley , and J. Wheatley: Acta Cryst. A, 35, 1015 (1979).
G. A. Smolensky , V. A. Isupov , A. I. Agranovskaya , and S. N. Popov: Sov. Phys. Solid State, 2, 2584 (1961).
G. I. Skanavi , I. M. Ksendzov , V. A. Trigubenko , and V. G. Prokhvatilov: Sov. Phys. JETP 6, 250 (1958).
M. L. Mulvihill , L. E. Cross , and K. Uchino: Proc. 8th European Mtg. Ferroelectricity , Nijmegen (1995).
Pyroelectric Devices
A. Rogalski: Sensor. Mater, 12(5), 233 (2000).
J. M. Herbert: Ferroelectric Transducers and Sensors, p. 267, Gordon & Breach, New York (1982).
S. G. Porter: Pyroelectricity and Its Use in Infrared Detectors, Plessey Optoelectronics and Microwave Ltd.,
Towcester, U.K. (1980).
M. E. Lines and A. M. Glass: Principles and Applications of Ferroelectrics and Related Materials, Clarendon
Press, Oxford (1977).
A. S. Bhalla , R. E. Newnham , L. E. Cross , W. A. Schulze , J. P. Dougherty , and W. A. Smith: Ferroelectrics,
33 139 (1981).
B. M. Kulwicki , A. Amin , H. R. Beratan , and C. M. Hanson: Proc. Int’l Symp. Appl. Ferroelectr., Greenville,
SC, IEEE, p. 1 (1992).
K. Shibata , K. Takeuchi , T. Tanaka , S. Yokoo , S. Nakano , and Y. Kuwano: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.,
24(Suppl.24–3), 181 (1985).
R. G. F. Taylor and H. A. H. Boot: Contemp. Phys., 14, 55 (1973).
D. J. Warner , D. J. Pedder , I. S. Moody , and J. Burrage: Ferroelectrics, 33, 249 (1981).
S. Priya and K. Uchino: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 42 5158–55164 (2003).
A. S. Mischenko , Q. Zhang , J. F. Scott , R. W. Whatmore , and N. D. Mathur: Science 311 1270 (2006).
Science 8 August (2008).
Piezoelectric Devices
B. Jaffe , W. Cook , and H. Jaffe : Piezoelectric Ceramics, Academic Press, London (1971).
W. G. Cady : Piezoelectricity, McGraw-Hill, New York, revised edition by Dover Publications (1964).
M. E. Lines and A. M. Glass : Principles and Applications of Ferroelectric Materials, Clarendon Press, Oxford
(1977).
K. Uchino : Piezoelectric Actuators and Ultrasonic Motors, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA (1996).
K. Uchino : Piezoelectric/Electrostrictive Actuators, Morikita Publishing, Tokyo (1986).
T. Ikeda : Fundamentals of Piezoelectric Materials Science, Ohm Publishing Co., Tokyo (1984).
Y. Ito and K. Uchino : Piezoelectricity, in Wiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Vol. 16,
p. 479, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1999).
W. A. Smith : Proc. SPIE—The Int’l Soc. Opt. Eng., 1733 (1992).
H. Takeuchi , S. Jyomura , E. Yamamoto , and Y. Ito : J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 74, 1114 (1982).
Y. Yamashita , K. Yokoyama , H. Honda , and T. Takahashi : Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 20(Suppl. 20–4), 183 (1981).
Y. Ito , H. Takeuchi , S. Jyomura , K. Nagatsuma , and S. Ashida : Appl. Phys. Lett., 35, 595 (1979).
H. Takeuchi , H. Masuzawa , C. Nakaya , and Y. Ito : Proc. IEEE 1990 Ultrasonics Symp., 697 (1990).
J. Kuwata , K. Uchino , and S. Nomura : Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 21, 1298 (1982).
T. R. Shrout , Z. P. Chang , N. Kim , and S. Markgraf : Ferroelect. Lett., 12, 63 (1990).
R. E. Newnham , D. P. Skinner , and L. E. Cross : Mater. Res. Bull., 13, 525 (1978).
W. A. Smith : Proc. 1989 IEEE Ultrasonic Symp., 755 (1989).
Kistler , Stress Sensor, Production Catalog, Switzerland.
Tokin , Gyroscope, Production Catalog, Japan.
K. Uchino , S. Nomura , L. E. Cross , S. J. Jang , and R. E. Newham : Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 20, L367 (1981);
Y. Watabe : Bull. Ceramic Soc. Japan, 42(5), 396 (2007).
B. A. Auld : Acoustic Fields and Waves in Solids, 2nd ed., Robert E. Krieger, Melbourne (1990).
G. S. Kino : Acoustic Waves: Device Imaging and Analog Signal Processing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs,
NJ (1987).
C. S. Desilets , J. D. Fraser , and G. S. Kino : IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason., SU-25, 115 (1978).
S. Saitoh , T. Takeuchi , T. Kobayashi , K. Harada , S. Shimanuki , and Y. Yamashita : Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.,
38(5B), 3380–3384 (1999).
http://www.shumurie.co.jp
Popular mechanics, 180(3), 20 (2003).
C. Campbell : Surface Acoustic Wave Devices and Their Signal Processing Applications, Academic Press, San
Diego, CA (1989).
H. Matthews : Surface Wave Filters, Wiley Interscience, New York (1977).
A. Yamamoto and T. Higuchi : Japan. Patent disclosure, P2004-190537A (2004).
Z.-Y. Cheng : Private communication, Auburn University, Auburn, AL (2003).
http://www.thinksrs.com/products/QCM200.htm
C. A. Rosen : Proc. Electronic Compon. Symp., p. 205 (1957).
S. Kawashima , O. Ohnishi , H. Hakamata , S. Tagami , A. Fukuoka , T. Inoue , and S. Hirose : Proc. IEEE Int’l
Ustrasonic Symp. ‘94, France (Nov. 1994).
K. Uchino : Proc. Actuator 2006, p. 48, Bremen Messe, Bremen, Germany (June 14–16, 2006).
K. Uchino : Bull. Am. Ceram. Soc., 65(4), 647 (1986).
K. Uchino : MRS Bull., 18(4), 42 (1993).
Handbook on New Actuators for Precision Position Control, Edit. in Chief K. Uchino ., Fuji Technosystem,
Tokyo (1994).
K. Uchino : Recent developments in ceramic actuators, in Proc. Workshop Microsys. Technol. USA Can.,
Germany, mst news, special issue, VDI/VDE, 28–36 (1996).
K. Furuta and K. Uchino : Adv. Ceram. Mater., 1, 61 (1986).
J. von Cieminski and H. Beige : J. Phys. D, 24, 1182 (1991).
L. E. Cross , S. J. Jang , R. E. Newnham , S. Nomura , and K. Uchino : Ferroelectrics, 23(3), 187 (1980).
K. Uchino : Ceramic actuators, in Ceramic Data Book ‘88, Inst. Industrial Manufacturing Tech., Tokyo (1988).
K. Uchino and S. Nomura : Ferroelectrics, 50(1), 191 (1983).
A. Furuta , K. Y. Oh , and K. Uchino : Sensors Mater., 3(4), 205 (1992).
S. Takahashi , A. Ochi , M. Yonezawa , T. Yano , T. Hamatsuki , and I. Fujui : Ferroelectrics, 50, 181 (1993).
A. Bauer and F. Moller : Proc. 4th Int’l Conf. New Actuators, Germany, p. 128 (1994).
Active Control Experts, Inc. Catalogue “PZT Quick Pack” (1996).
Y. Sugawara , K. Onitsuka , S. Yoshikawa , Q. C. Xu , R. E. Newnham , and K. Uchino : J. Am. Ceram. Soc.,
75(4), 996 (1992).
H. Goto , K. Imanaka , and K. Uchino : Ultrasonic Technol, 5, 48 (1992).
K. Uchino and S. Hirose : IEEE UFFC Trans, 48, 307–321 (2001).
N. Kanbe , M. Aoyagi , S. Hirose , and Y. Tomikawa : J. Acoust. Soc. Jpn. (E), 14(4), 235 (1993).
S. Sugiyama and K. Uchino : Proc. Int’l. Symp. Appl. Ferroelectr. ‘86 , IEEE, p. 637 (1986).
C. Kusakabe , Y. Tomikawa , and T. Takano : IEEE Trans. UFFC, 37(6), 551 (1990).
T. Ota , T. Uchikawa , and T. Mizutani : Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 24(Suppl. 24–3), 193 (1985).
J. T. Dorsey , T. R. Sutter , and K. C. Wu : Proc. 3rd Int’l Conf. Adaptive Struct., p. 352 (1992).
B. Wada : JPL Document D-10659, p. 23 (1993).
F. K. Straub : Smart Mater. Struct., 5, 1 (1996).
P. C. Chen and I. Chopra : Smart Mater. Struct., 5, 35 (1996).
A. Ohgoshi and S. Nishigaki : Ceramic Data Book ‘81, p. 35, Inst. Industrial Manufacturing Technology, Tokyo
(1981).
Okamoto et al.: Broadcast. Technol. (7), 144 (1982).
M. Kobayashi , M. Tomita , K. Yamada , and M. Matsumoto : Natl. Tech. Rep. 28, 419 (1982).
K. Yamada et al.: Abstract Television Soc. Jpn., 8–2 (1982).
T. Yano , E. Sato , I. Fukui , and S. Hori : Proc. Int’l Symp. Soc. Inf. Display, p. 180 (1989).
N. Kurashima : Proc. Machine Tech. Inst. Seminar, MITI, Tsukuba, Japan (1999).
Y. Yokoya : Electron. Ceram., 22(111), 55 (1991).
A. Fujii : Proc. JTTAS Meeting on Dec. 2, Tokyo (2005).
M. P. Koster : Proc. 4th Int’l Conf. New Actuators, Germany, p. 144 (1994).
H. V. Barth : IBM Techn. Discl. Bull., 16, 2263 (1973).
V. V. Lavrinenko , S. S. Vishnevski , and I. K. Kartashev : Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii,
Radioelektronica, 13, 57 (1976).
P. E. Vasiliev et al.: UK Patent Application GB 2020857 A (1979).
T. Sashida : Oyo Butsuri 51, 713 (1982).
A. Kumada : Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 24(Suppl. 24–2), 739 (1985).
B. Koc , S. Cagatay , and K. Uchino : IEEE Ultrason. Ferroelect. Freq. Control Trans., 49(4), 495–500 (2002).
S. Cagatay , B. Koc , and K. Uchino : IEEE Trans. UFFC, 50(7), 782–786 (2003).
K. Uchino : Proc. New Actuator 2004 (Bremen, June14–16), p. 127 (2004).
Y. Fuda and T. Yoshida : Ferroelectrics, 160, 323 (1994).
K. Nakamura , M. Kurosawa , and S. Ueha : Proc. Jpn. Acoustic Soc., No. 1-1-18, p. 917 (Oct., 1993).
K. Uchino , K. Kato , and M. Tohda : Ferroelectrics, 87, 331 (1988).
S. Ueha and Y. Tomikawa : Ultrasonic motors, in Monographs in Electr. Electron. Eng., vol. 29, Oxford Science
Publ., Oxford (1993).
Nikkei Mechanical , Feb. 28 issue, p. 44 (1983).
M. Kurosawa , S. Ueha , and E. Mori : J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 77, 1431 (1985).
T. Sashida : Mech. Automat Jpn., 15(2), 31 (1983).
K. Ise : J. Acoust. Soc. Jpn., 43, 184 (1987).
M. Kasuga , T. Satoh , N. Tsukada , T. Yamazaki , F. Ogawa , M. Suzuki , I. Horikoshi , and T. Itoh : J. Soc.
Precision Eng., 57, 63 (1991).
J. Cummings and D. Stutts : Design for manufacturability of ceramic components, Am. Ceram. Soc. Trans., 147
(1994).
A. Kumada : Ultrason. Technol. 1(2), 51 (1989).
Y. Tomikawa and T. Takano : Nikkei Mech., (Suppl.), 194 (1990).
Y. Okamoto , R. Yoshida , and H. Sueyoshi : Konica Minolta Tech. Rep., 1, p. 23 (2004).
K. Uchino and T. Ishii : J. Ceram. Soc. Japan, 96, 863 (1988).
K. Uchino : Proceedings of 5th Int’l Workshop on Piezoelectric Mater. Appl., State College, PA (Oct. 6–10,
2008).
H. W. Kim , S. Priya , K. Uchino , and R. E. Newnham : J. Electroceram., 15, 27–34 (2005).
H. W. Kim , S. Priya , and K. Uchino : Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 45(7), 5836–5840 (2006).
H. W. Kim , S. Priya , H. Stephanau , and K. Uchino : IEEE Trans. UFFC, 54(9), 1851–1859 (2007).
K. Uchino and A. Vazquez Carazo : Proc. 11th Int’l Conf. New Actuators, Bremen, Germany, June 9–11, 2008,
A3.7, pp. 137–140 (2008).
http://www.lightningswitch.com/
Electro-Optic Devices
K. Tokiwa and K. Uchino : Ferroelectrics, 94, 87 (1989).
K. Uchino and T. Takasu : Inspection, 10, 29 (1986).
K. Uchino : Ceram. Int., 21, 309 (1995).
F. Kojima , J. Kuwata , and S. Nomura : Proc. 1st. Mtg. Ferroelectr. Mater. Appl. (Kyoto), p. 155 (1977).
J. Kuwata , K. Uchino , and S. Nomura : Ferroelectrics, 22, 863 (1979).
R. Ujiie and K. Uchino : Proc. IEEE Ultrasonic Symp . (Hawaii), p. 725 (1990).
L. M. Levinson ed.: Electronic Ceramics, Marcel Dekker, New York, Chap. 7, p. 371 (1988).
J. T. Cutchen : Proc. 49th Annu. Sci. Mtg. Aerosp. Med. Assoc., New Orleans, LA, May (1978).
A. Kumada , K. Kitta , K. Kato , and T. Komata : Proc. Ferroelectr. Mater. Appl., 2, 205 (1977).
K. Murano : Ceram. Trans. Electro-Opt. Nonlinear Opt. Mater., 14, 283 (1990).
K. Uchino , K. Tokiwa , J. Giniewicz , Y. Murai , and K. Ohmura : Ceram. Trans. Electro-Opt. Nonlinear Opt.
Mater., 14, 297 (1990).
K. Fujiura : Bull. Ceram. Soc. Jpn., 41(9), 678–682 (2006).
D. A. Scrymgeour , B. Koc , L. Tian , M. W. Gentzel , K. Uchino , and V. Gopalan : J. Lightw. Technol., 23(9),
2772–2777 (2005).
M. E. Lines and A. M. Glass : Principles and Applications of Ferroelectrics and Related Materials, p. 604,
Clarendon Press, Oxford (1977).
I. P. Kaminov : Trans. IEEE, M. T. T., 23, 57 (1975).
K. Nashimoto : J. Ceram. Jpn., 37, 538 (2002).
PTC Materials
W. Heywang: J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 47 , 484 (1964).
E. Andrich: Electr. Appl, 26 , 123 (1965-1966).
R. E. Newnham: J. Mater. Educ., 6 (5), 806 (1984).
K. Nomura S. and Doi: Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 9 , 716 (1970).
H. Niimi: Mater. Integr, 19 (3), 72-76 (2006).
Murata Mfg. Comp. Catalog: Mysterious Stones.
Composite Materials
R. E. Newnham et al.: Mater. Res. Bull., 13, 525 (1978).
K. Uchino : Solid State Phys., 21, 27 (1986).
T. Kitayama and S. Sugawara : Study Comm. Electron. Circuit Compon. Mater., Ref. no. CPM72-17 (1972).
K. Uchino , S. Nomura , and R. E. Newnham : Sensor Technol., 2, 81 (1982).
K. A. Klicker , J. V. Biggers , and R. E. Newnham : J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 64, 5 (1981).
http://www.matsysinc.com/, U.S. Patent 5,340,510.
W. A. Smith : Proc. IEEE Ultrasonic Symp. 89 , p. 755 (1989).
L. A. Pauer : IEEE Int’l Convention Record, 1–5 (1973).
H. Banno : Proc. 6th Int’l Meeting on Ferroelectricity (IMF-6, Kobe, 1985); Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 24(Suppl. 24–2),
445 (1985).
H. Banno and T. Tsunooka : Ceramic Data Book ‘87, Industrial Product Technology Soc., Tokyo, p. 328 (1987).
D. P. Skinner , R. E. Newnham , and L. E. Cross : Mater. Res. Bull., 13, 599 (1978).
T. R. Shrout , W. A. Schulze , and J. V. Biggers : Mater. Res. Bull., 14, 1553 (1979).
M. Miyashita et al.: Ferroelectrics, 27, 397 (1980).
A. Safari , R. E. Newnham , L. E. Cross , and W. A. Schulze : Ferroelectrics, 41, 197 (1982).
K. Uchino and T. Ishii : J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn., 96, 863 (1988).
ACX Company catalogue: Passive Damping Ski .
Y. Suzuki , K. Uchino , H. Gouda , M. Sumita , R. E. Newnham , and A. R. Ramachandran : J. Ceram. Soc.
Jpn., Int’l Edition 99, 1096 (1991).
E. Hausler , L. Stein , and G. Harbauer : Ferroelectrics, 60, 277 (1984).
J. Kymissis , C. Kendall , J. Paradiso , and N. Gershenfield : Digest of Papers, Second IEEE International
Symposium on Wearable Computers, Pittsburgh, PA, p. 132 (1998).
L. J. Nelson : Mater. Sci. Technol., 18, 1245 (2002).
H. A. Sodano , G. Park , D. J. Leo , and D. J. Inman : Smart structure and materials: Smart sensor technology
and measurement systems, Proc. of SPIE , 5050, 101 (2003).
K. Uchino : Proc. 9th Jpn. Int’l SAMPE Symp., pp. 11–14, Nov. 18–21, Tokyo (2005).
J. Ryu , A. Vazquez Carazo , K. Uchino , and H. E. Kim : Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 40, 4948–4951 (2001).
T. Tanimoto , K. Horiuchi , and K. Uchino : Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 36 Part I (No. 9B), 6110 (1997).