Design of Compression Members
Design of Compression Members
Compression
Members
Design of Compression Members Design of Steel Structures to EC3
There are basically four different cross-section classes and they are defined
as:
1- Class 1 cross-sections: are those which can form a plastic hinge with the rotation
capacity required from plastic analysis without reduction of the resistance.
2- Class 2 cross-sections: are those which can develop their plastic moment
resistance, but have limited rotation capacity because of local buckling.
3- Class3 cross-sections: are those in which the stress in the extreme compression
fiber of the steel member assuming an elastic distribution of stresses can reach the
yield strength, but local buckling is liable to prevent development of the plastic
moment resistance.
4- Class 4 cross-sections: are those in which local buckling will occur before the
attainment of yield stress in one or more parts of the cross section.
Note:
The design values of the compression force 𝑁𝐸𝑑 at each cross-section shall satisfy:
𝑁𝐸𝑑
≤ 1.0
𝑁𝑐,𝑅𝑑
The design resistance of the cross-section for uniform compression 𝑁𝑐,𝑅𝑑 should be
determined as follows:
2- Buckling Resistance:
𝑁𝐸𝑑
≤ 1.0
𝑁𝑏,𝑅𝑑
𝐿 1
𝜆̅ = √𝐴 𝑓𝑦 ⁄𝑁𝑐𝑟 = 𝑐𝑟 for class 1,2 or 3 cross-sections
𝑖 𝜆 1
𝐴 𝑓𝑦 𝐿𝑐𝑟 √𝐴𝑒𝑓𝑓 /𝐴
𝜆̅ = √ 𝑒𝑓𝑓 = for class 4 cross-sections
𝑁𝑐𝑟 𝑖 𝜆 1
α is an imperfection factor.
𝑁𝑐𝑟 is the elastic critical force for the relevant buckling mode based on the gross
cross-sectional properties.
Values of the reduction factor χ for the appropriate non-dimensional slenderness 𝜆̅ may be
obtained from Figure 6.4.
𝑁𝐸𝑑
For slenderness 𝜆̅ ≤ 0.2 or for 𝑁𝑐𝑟
≤ 0.04 the buckling effects may be ignored and only cross
sectional checks apply.
Solution:
Preliminary design – Assuming class 1, 2 or 3 cross sections, yields:
Use 𝑪𝑯𝑺 𝟐𝟔. 𝟗 × 𝟑. 𝟐 section with A=2.38 cm2, d/t=8.41, I = 1.7 cm4, i= 0.846 cm.
Buckling lengths – According to the support conditions, the buckling lengths are equal
in both planes, given by:
Buckling in the plane of the structure - 𝐿𝐸 = 2 × 3 = 6 𝑚
210×109
𝜆1 = 𝜋√275×106 = 86.81
𝐿 6×102
𝜆=𝑖= = 709.21
0.846
𝜆 709.21
𝜆̅ = 𝜆 = = 8.16 > 1 → 𝐿𝑜𝑛𝑔 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛
1 86.81
Calculation of the reduction factor 𝒙
𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑣𝑒 𝑎 → 𝛼 = 0.21
1
𝑥= , 𝑏𝑢𝑡 𝑥 ≤ 1.0
∅ + √∅2 − 𝜆2̅
∅ = 0.5[1 + 𝛼(𝜆̅ − 0.2) + 𝜆̅2 ]
∅ = 0.5[1 + 0.21 × (8.16 − 0.2) + 8.162 ] =34.62
1
𝑥= = 0.0146
34.62 + √34.622 − 8.162
-Safety verification
𝑁𝑏,𝑅𝑑 = 𝑥𝐴𝑓𝑦 ⁄𝛾𝑀1 = 0.0146 × 1.09 × 10−4 × 275 × 103 ⁄1.0 = 0.4376 𝐾𝑁
Try heavier section such 𝑪𝑯𝑺 𝟐𝟏𝟗. 𝟏 × 𝟏𝟐. 𝟓 section with A=81.1 cm2, d/t=17.5,
I = 4350 cm4, i= 7.32 cm.
Buckling lengths – According to the support conditions, the buckling lengths are equal
in both planes, given by:
Buckling in the plane of the structure - 𝐿𝐸 = 2 × 3 = 6 𝑚
210×109
𝜆1 = 𝜋√275×106 = 86.81
𝐿 6×102
𝜆=𝑖= = 81.96
7.32
𝜆 81.96
𝜆̅ = 𝜆 = 86.81 = 0.944 < 1 → 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑡 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛
1
Calculation of the reduction factor 𝒙
𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑣𝑒 𝑎 → 𝛼 = 0.21
∅ = 0.5[1 + 0.21 × (0.944 − 0.2) + 0.9442 ] =1.02
1
𝑥= = 0.711
1.02 + √1.022 − 0.9442
-Safety verification
𝑁𝑏,𝑅𝑑 = 𝑥𝐴𝑓𝑦 ⁄𝛾𝑀1 = 0.711 × 81.1 × 10−4 × 275 × 103 ⁄1.0 = 1585.70 𝐾𝑁
Problem (2)
Check a column subjected to an axial compression force 6000 KN, using a UC 254 ×
254 × 167 (universal column) cross section in S 355 steel, according to EC3-1-1. The
column is supported as shown in the figure. With length of 5 m.
Solution:
Section with A=213 cm2, (c/t) flange=3.48, (c/t) web=10.4, Iy-y = 30000 cm4, Iz-z = 9870
cm4, iy-y = 11.9 cm, iz-z = 6.81 cm
235 𝑐
Flange: (c/t) =3.48, 𝜀 = √355 = 0.81 → 𝑡 < 9𝜀 → 3.48 < 9 ∗ 0.81 →
3.48 < 7.29 →→ 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 1
235 𝑐
Web: (c/t) =10.4, 𝜀 = √355 = 0.81 → 𝑡 < 33𝜀 → 10.4 < 33 ∗ 0.81 →
10.4 < 26.73 →→ 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 1
∴ 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 1
−4
103
𝑁𝑐,𝑅𝑑 = 𝐴𝑓𝑦 ⁄𝛾𝑀0 = 213 × 10 × 355 × = 7561.5 > 6000 → 𝑆𝑎𝑓𝑒
1.0
Buckling lengths – According to the support conditions, the buckling lengths are equal
in both planes, given by:
Buckling in the plane of the structure (plane x-z) - 𝐿𝐸 𝑦 = 1.0 × 5.0 = 5.0 𝑚
Buckling in the plane of the structure (plane x-y) - 𝐿𝐸 𝑧 = 1.0 × 3.0 = 3.0 𝑚
210×109
𝜆1 = 𝜋√355×106 = 76.4
𝐿𝐸 𝑦 5×102 𝜆𝑦 42.01
𝜆𝑦 = = = 42.01, ̅̅̅
𝜆𝑦 = = = 0.55 < 1 → 𝑆ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑡 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛
𝑖𝑦 11.9 𝜆1 76.4
𝐿𝐸 𝑧 3×102 𝜆 44.05
𝜆𝑧 = = ̅̅̅𝑧 = 𝑧 =
= 44.05, 𝜆 = 0.57 < 1 → 𝑆ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑡 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛
𝑖𝑧 6.81 𝜆1 76.4
Problem (3)
Check a column subjected to an axial compression force 2500 KN, using a UB 533 ×
210 × 82 (universal beam) cross section in S 275 steel, according to EC3-1-1. The
column is supported as shown in the figure. With length of 6 m.
Solution:
Section with A=105 cm2, (c/t) flange=6.58, (c/t) web=49.6, Iy-y = 47500 cm4, Iz-z = 2010
cm4, iy-y = 21.3 cm, iz-z = 4.38 cm
235 𝑐
Flange: (c/t) =6.58, 𝜀 = √275 = 0.92 → 𝑡 < 9𝜀 → 6.58 < 9 ∗ 0.92 →
6.58 < 8.28 →→ 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 1
235 𝑐
Web: (c/t) =49.6, 𝜀 = √275 = 0.92 → 𝑡 < 42𝜀 → 49.6 < 42 ∗ 0.92 →
49.6 < 38.64 →→ 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠 4
From bluebook 𝐴𝑒𝑓𝑓 = 96.4 𝑐𝑚2
103
𝑁𝑐,𝑅𝑑 = 𝐴𝑒𝑓𝑓 𝑓𝑦 ⁄𝛾𝑀0 = 96.4 × 10−4 × 275 × = 2651 > 2500 → 𝑆𝑎𝑓𝑒
1.0
Buckling lengths – According to the support conditions, the buckling lengths are equal
in both planes, given by:
Buckling in the plane of the structure (plane x-z) - 𝐿𝐸 𝑦 = 1.0 × 6.0 = 6.0 𝑚
Buckling in the plane of the structure (plane x-y) - 𝐿𝐸 𝑧 = 1.0 × 2.0 = 2.0 𝑚
210×109
𝜆1 = 𝜋√275×106 = 86.81
𝐿 √𝐴𝑒𝑓𝑓 /𝐴 6×100×√96.4/105
̅̅̅
𝜆𝑦 = 𝑖𝑐𝑟 𝜆 = 21.3×86.81 = 0.31 < 1 → 𝑆ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑡 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛
𝑦 1
Problem (4)
The following truss design the upper cord members compressed members, considering
the same type of cross section, that is: Square hollow sections (SHS), with welded
connections between the members of the structure.
Solution:
Based on the axial force diagrams represented in Figure 3.53, the most
compressed chord member is under an axial force of 742.6 kN and it is
simultaneously one of the longest members, with L = 3.00 m; For the definition of the
buckling lengths of the members, it is assumed that all the nodes of the truss are braced
in the direction perpendicular to the plane of the structure.
Upper cord:
→ 𝐴 ≥ 27 × 10−4 𝑚2 = 27 𝑐𝑚2
Use 𝑺𝑯𝑺 𝟏𝟐𝟎 × 𝟏𝟐𝟎 × 𝟖 for upper cord with A=35.5 cm2, I=738cm4, i=4.56cm
210×109
𝜆1 = 𝜋√275×106 = 86.81 , LE=3.0 m
𝐿𝐸 3×102 𝜆 65.78
𝜆= = = 65.78 𝜆̅ = 𝜆 = 86.81 = 0.757 < 1 → 𝑆ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑡 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛
𝑖 4.56 1
Calculation of the reduction factor 𝒙
𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑣𝑒 𝑎 → 𝛼 = 0.21