MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: ALBERT JOHN B. FORNOLES Name of Rater: CATHERINE P. BERMAL

Position: SHS TEACHER III Position: MASTER TEACHER I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DepED SDO CAMARINES SUR Date of Review: FEBRUARY 07, 2023
Rating Period: SY 2022-2023

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied Classroom observation tool Quality
Education Knowledge knowledge of (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-
Services and content within and observer agreement form/s done
Pedagogy across curriculum through onsite/face to face/in
teaching areas. person classroom observation.

If onsite/face to face/in person

classes are not implemented,

 through observation of
synchronous/asynchron
ous teaching in other Efficiency
modalities; or
 through observation of
demonstration teaching
via LAC session
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 2. Used a range Classroom observation tool Quality
Education of teaching (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-
Services strategies that observer agreement form/s done
enhance learner through onsite/face to face/in
achievement in person classroom observation.
literacy and
numeracy skills. If onsite/face to face/in person
classes are not implemented,

 through observation of
synchronous/asynchron
ous teaching in other
modalities; or
 through observation of Efficiency
demonstration teaching
via LAC session

Basic 3. Applied a range Classroom observation tool Quality

Education of teaching (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-
Services strategies to observer agreement form/s done
develop critical through onsite/face to face/in
and creative person classroom observation.
thinking, as well
as other higher- If onsite/face to face/in person
order thinking classes are not implemented,
skills.
 through observation of Efficiency
synchronous/asynchron
ous teaching in other
modalities; or
 through observation of
demonstration teaching
via LAC session
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed Classroom observation tool Quality
Education Environment classroom (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-
Services and Diversity structure to observer agreement form/s done
of Learners engage learners, through onsite/face to face/in
individually or in person classroom observation.
groups, in
meaningful If onsite/face to face/in person
exploration, classes are not implemented, Efficiency
discovery and
hands-on  through observation of
activities within a synchronous/asynchron
range of physical ous teaching in other
learning modalities; or
environments.  through observation of
demonstration teaching
via LAC session

Basic 5. Managed Classroom observation tool Quality

Education learner behavior (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-
Services constructively by observer agreement form/s done
applying positive through onsite/face to face/in
and non-violent person classroom observation.
discipline to
ensure learning- If onsite/face to face/in person
focused classes are not implemented,
environments. Efficiency
 through observation of
synchronous/asynchron
ous teaching in other
modalities; or
 through observation of
demonstration teaching
via LAC session
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 6. Used Classroom observation tool Quality
Education differentiated, (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-
Services developmentally observer agreement form/s done
appropriate through onsite/face to face/in
learning person classroom observation.
experiences to
address learners’ If onsite/face to face/in person
gender, needs, classes are not implemented,
strengths,
interests and  through observation of
experiences. synchronous/asynchron Efficiency
ous teaching in other
modalities; or
 through observation of
demonstration teaching
via LAC session

Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, Classroom observation tool Quality

Education and Planning managed and (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-
Services implemented observer agreement form/s done
developmentally through onsite/face to face/in
sequenced person classroom observation.
teaching and
learning If onsite/face to face/in person
processes to classes are not implemented,
meet curriculum
requirements and  through observation of
varied teaching synchronous/asynchron
contexts. ous teaching in other Efficiency
modalities; or
 through observation of
demonstration teaching
via LAC session
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

8. Participated in 1. Proof/s of attendance in LAC Quality

collegial sessions/FGDs/meetings/other
discussions that collegial discussions.
use teacher and
learner feedback 2. Minutes of LAC sessions/ Timeliness
to enrich teaching FGDs/meetings/other collegial
practice. discussions on use of teacher
and learner feedback to enrich
teaching practice.

3. Reflection notes of teachers

on their demonstration teaching
practices following participation
from LAC sessions/
FGDs/meetings/other collegial
discussions that use teacher
and learner feedback to enrich
teaching practice with proof of
attendance.

4. Any equivalent of ALS

form/document that highlights
the objective.

Basic 9. Selected, Classroom observation tool Quality

Education developed, (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-
Services organized and observer agreement form/s done
used appropriate through onsite/face to face/in
teaching and person classroom observation.
learning
resources,
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
including ICT, to If onsite/face to face/in person Efficiency
address learning classes are not implemented,
goals.
 through observation of
synchronous/asynchron
ous teaching in other
modalities; or
 through observation of
demonstration teaching
via LAC session

Basic 4. 10. Designed, Classroom observation tool Quality

Education Assessment selected, (COT) rating sheet and/or inter-
Services and organized and observer agreement form/s done
Reporting used diagnostic, through onsite/face to face/in
formative and person classroom observation.
summative
assessment If onsite/face to face/in person
strategies classes are not implemented,
consistent with
curriculum  through observation of Efficiency
requirements. synchronous/asynchron
ous teaching in other
modalities; or
 through observation of
demonstration teaching
via LAC session

Basic 11. Monitored and Any one (1) of the following Quality
Education evaluated learner
Services progress and  Individual Learning
achievement Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
using learner  Peer Assessment data Timeliness
attainment data.  Sample of learner’s
output with self-
reflection/self-
assessment
 Progress
charts/anecdotal
records
 Class/e-class
records/grading sheets
 Lesson plans showing
index of mastery.
 Frequency of errors with
identified least/most
mastered skills.
 Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective
(e.g. Individual Learning
Agreement (ILA), ALS
Assessment Form 2)
 Others (Please specify
and provide
annotations).

Basic 12. Any one (1) of the following Quality

Education Communicated
Services promptly and  A sample of corrected
clearly the test paper of a learner in
learners’ needs, a learning area with
progress and parent’s or guardian’s
achievement to signature and date of
key stakeholders,
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
including receipt.
parents/guardians  Minutes of meetings
. with key stakeholders
(e.. PTA, SGC, SPT<
CPC) with proof of
attendance.
 Report cards with
parent’s or guardian’s
signature in all quarters
supported by minutes of
Timeliness
meeting.
 Communication with
parents/guardians using
various modalities.
 Anecdotal record
showing entries per
quarter.
 Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective.
 Others (Please specify
and provide annotation)

Basic 13. Applied A reflection/journal entry that Quality

Education personal highlights the application of a
Services philosophy of learner-centered teaching
teaching that is philosophy in the lesson plan or
learner-centered. community work.
Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 14.Set 10% 1. Certification from ICT Quality
Education professional Coordinator/School Head/Focal
Services development Person in charge of e- SAT
goals based on
Philippine 2. IPCRF – DP
Professional for
Teachers 3. Midyear Review Form

4. Updated IPCRF – DP from Efficiency

Phase II.
Timeliness

Plus 15. Performed Any one (1) of the following Quality

Factor various related
works/activities  Committee involvement
that contribute to  Involve as
teaching and module/learning
learning process material writer/validator.
 Involvement as
person/speaker/learning
facilitator in the
RO/SDO/school
Efficiency
initiative-based
instruction.
 Book or journal
authorship/co-
authorship/contributor
ship;
 Advisership/coordinator
ship/chairpersonship
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
 Participation in Timeliness
demonstration teaching
 Participation as
research presenter in
forum conference
 Mentoring pre-service/in
service
 Conducted research
within the rating period.
 Others (Please specify)

With annotation on how it

contributed to the teaching-
learning process.

Rater Ratee Approving Authority