04 Boris-FARNUNG Floating-PV

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 14

IEA PVPS Task 13

Reliability and Performance of PV Systems

Performance and Reliability of Floating PV Technology


Boris Farnung, VDE Renewables, Alzenau, Germany
Intersolar Conference, Munich, Germany, 06 October, 2021
Outline
1. Introduction
2. Performance of Floating PV Systems
3. Standardization, Bankability and Insurability
4. Conclusions
5. Future Work of F-PV in Task 13
PVPS

2
1. Integration of PV
“PV going everywhere”
Desert PV Vehicle integrated PV Agri PV

© Sono Motors © SolarPower Europe


© IEA PVPS Task 13

Building integrated PV PV in transport infrastructure Floating PV


PVPS

© Ertex Solar © AIT © Baywa r.e.


3
1. Introduction
• FPV offers a unique possibility to deploy • Other potential benefits for FPV:
PV without interfering with urban - Reducing water evaporation
development. - Decreased algal growth
• Typically, the local climate around lakes - Hybridization with hydropower
provide slightly lower ambient • Huge potential offshore, half of the
temperatures and higher wind speeds worlds population lives within 100 km
than dry land. from sea shore
PVPS

© Baywa r.e.
4
2. Performance of Floating PV Systems
PVPS

Aerial photograph and details of the Singapore Tengeh Reservoir test-bed


with different Floating PV technologies [Reindl, 2018] 5
2. Performance of Floating PV Systems
Performance Ratio Comparison

PR 10-15% higher than typical rooftop PV systems in


PVPS

Singapore (with PR of 75 ~ 80%) [Reindl, 2018] 6


2. Performance of Floating PV Systems
• Module temperatures about 3°C to 15°C
lower than land based systems [1], [2], [3]
• Published yield gain:
3% larger than land based PV in
Netherlands, 6% larger than rooftop in
Singapore [3]
Additional potential benefits for on-shore FPV
• Reducing water evaporation
Source: [1] • Decreased algal growth
[1] T. Reindl, “At the heart of floating solar: Singapore,” PV Tech
Power, vol. 14, pp. 18–23, 2018. • Avoiding land-use conflict
[2] H. Liu, et al., “Field experience and performance analysis of
floating PV technologies in the tropics,” Prog. Photovoltaics Res.
Appl., vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 957–967, 2018. → KPIs for double use benefits have to be
PVPS

[3] M. Dörenkämper, et al., “The cooling effect of floating PV in


two different climate zones: A comparison of field test data from
developed; Verification and further R&D
7
the Netherlands and Singapore,” Solar Energy 214 (2021) 239– necessary
247, 2020.
3. Standardization, Bankability and Insurability
High uncertainties in the implementation and evaluation of floating PV concepts:
• Suitability of components
• Possible risk in case of multiple use of water bodies
• Handling in the event of faults, risk due to electrical potentials
• Earthing, lightning and overvoltage protection

No specific standards for floating PV systems exist


Many questions depending on individual concept rather than FPV application.
PVPS

8
3. Standardization, Bankability and Insurability
Process for developing new standards to ensure quality and electrical safety
1. Analysis of the current situation
2. Formation of standardization committees with market participants
3. Definition of scope of application
4. Research and delimitation to similar/overlapping subject areas to avoid double
standardization
5. Definition of requirements - Transfer of the current state of knowledge and
new criteria into a new set of regulations
Typically, this process takes at least 3 to 5 years.
PVPS

9
3. Standardization, Bankability and Insurability

The VDE Pyramid of Quality – to keep up with the dynamics of the market
PVPS

© VDE Renewables GmbH


10
3. Standardization, Bankability and Insurability
VDE Renewables has developed
procedure to certify floating PV power
plants.
The program takes into account
existing standards from a wide variety
industries.
Remaining gaps are closed with own
criteria based on the expertise from
standardization and input by the
international network.
The program supports industry to
PVPS

achieve bankability and insurability of


the projects. 11
3. Conclusions

• Floating PV is not a new technology


• FPV is a promising application to support energy transition
• Potential of higher performance than ground mounted or other intergrated
systems exist
• No international floating PV standard exists – but defined programs and
corproate standards can support bankability and insurability
PVPS

12
4. Future Work of Floating PV in Task 13
Lead: Josefine Selj, IFE; Wilfried van Sark, Utrecht University
Contributors: OFI (AUT), PCCL (AUT), Tractebel (BEL), ISE (DEU), VDE (DEU), Sicon
(DNK), CEA-INES (FRA), AIST (Japan), SERIS, KMUTT (THA), CWRU (USA),
SANDIA (USA), EDF (FRA), TNO (NLD)
• Report: Performance and
Activity focus: reliability of FPV systems
(M30)
• Performance of FPV systems (collection of existing data) • Workshop: Performance and
reliability of commercial
• Global Survey of FPV Technologies for different (large pilot phase) FPV
conditions (lakes, sheltered ocean, nearshore, offshore) technologies (M20)

• Loss mechanisms which differ from ground-based PV towards model for floating PV
• Meta study of documented degradation modes
• O&M of FPV (New challenges, increased importance of autonomy, Soiling mitigation)
PVPS

Work towards common guidelines for modeling and selection of input parameters
13
for floating PV, onshore and offshore
www.iea-pvps.org

Thank You for Your Attention!

Boris Farnung, VDE Renewables


[email protected]

You might also like