Universe
Universe
Diameter Unknown.[3]
Observable universe:
8.8 × 1026 m (28.5 Gpc
or 93 Gly)[4]
Mass (ordinary At least 1053 kg[5]
matter)
Average density (with 9.9 × 10−27 kg/m3[6]
energy)
Definition
0:50
Hubble Space Telescope – Ultra deep field galaxies to Legacy field zoom out
Etymology
The word universe derives from the Old
French word univers, which in turn derives
from the Latin word universum.[32] The
Latin word was used by Cicero and later
Latin authors in many of the same senses
as the modern English word is used.[33]
Synonyms
A term for universe among the ancient
Greek philosophers from Pythagoras
onwards was τὸ πᾶν (tò pân) 'the all',
defined as all matter and all space, and τὸ
ὅλον (tò hólon) 'all things', which did not
necessarily include the void.[34][35] Another
synonym was ὁ κόσμος (ho kósmos)
meaning 'the world, the cosmos'.[36]
Synonyms are also found in Latin authors
(totum, mundus, natura)[37] and survive in
modern languages, e.g., the German words
Das All, Weltall, and Natur for universe. The
same synonyms are found in English, such
as everything (as in the theory of
everything), the cosmos (as in cosmology),
the world (as in the many-worlds
interpretation), and nature (as in natural
laws or natural philosophy).[38]
In this schematic diagram, time passes from left to right, with the universe represented by a disk-shaped "slice" at any
given time. Time and size are not to scale. To make the early stages visible, the time to the afterglow stage (really the first
0.003%) is stretched and the subsequent expansion (really by 1,100 times to the present) is largely suppressed.
The initial hot, dense state is called the
Planck epoch, a brief period extending
from time zero to one Planck time unit of
approximately 10−43 seconds. During the
Planck epoch, all types of matter and all
types of energy were concentrated into a
dense state, and gravity—currently the
weakest by far of the four known forces—
is believed to have been as strong as the
other fundamental forces, and all the
forces may have been unified. The physics
controlling this very early period (including
quantum gravity in the Planck epoch) is
not understood, so we cannot say what, if
anything, happened before time zero. Since
the Planck epoch, space has been
expanding to its present scale, with a very
short but intense period of cosmic inflation
speculated to have occurred within the
first 10−32 seconds.[41] This was a kind of
expansion different from those we can see
around us today. Objects in space did not
physically move; instead the metric that
defines space itself changed. Although
objects in spacetime cannot move faster
than the speed of light, this limitation does
not apply to the metric governing
spacetime itself. This initial period of
inflation would explain why space appears
to be very flat, and much larger than light
could travel since the start of the universe.
Within the first fraction of a second of the
universe's existence, the four fundamental
forces had separated. As the universe
continued to cool down from its
inconceivably hot state, various types of
subatomic particles were able to form in
short periods of time known as the quark
epoch, the hadron epoch, and the lepton
epoch. Together, these epochs
encompassed less than 10 seconds of
time following the Big Bang. These
elementary particles associated stably
into ever larger combinations, including
stable protons and neutrons, which then
formed more complex atomic nuclei
through nuclear fusion. This process,
known as Big Bang nucleosynthesis, only
lasted for about 17 minutes and ended
about 20 minutes after the Big Bang, so
only the fastest and simplest reactions
occurred. About 25% of the protons and all
the neutrons in the universe, by mass, were
converted to helium, with small amounts
of deuterium (a form of hydrogen) and
traces of lithium. Any other element was
only formed in very tiny quantities. The
other 75% of the protons remained
unaffected, as hydrogen nuclei.[42][43]: 27–42
Physical properties
Of the four fundamental interactions,
gravitation is the dominant at astronomical
length scales. Gravity's effects are
cumulative; by contrast, the effects of
positive and negative charges tend to
cancel one another, making
electromagnetism relatively insignificant
on astronomical length scales. The
remaining two interactions, the weak and
strong nuclear forces, decline very rapidly
with distance; their effects are confined
mainly to sub-atomic length scales.[47]: 1470
Television signals broadcast from Earth will never reach the edges of this image.
megaparsecs, as implied by a
suggested resolution of the No-Boundary
Proposal.[62][b]
Age and expansion
Astronomers have discovered stars in the Milky Way galaxy that are almost 13.6 billion years old.
Over time, the universe and its contents
have evolved; for example, the relative
population of quasars and galaxies has
changed[63] and space itself has
expanded. Due to this expansion,
scientists on Earth can observe the light
from a galaxy 30 billion light-years away
even though that light has traveled for only
13 billion years; the very space between
them has expanded. This expansion is
consistent with the observation that the
light from distant galaxies has been
redshifted; the photons emitted have been
stretched to longer wavelengths and lower
frequency during their journey. Analyses of
Type Ia supernovae indicate that the
spatial expansion is accelerating.[64][65]
Spacetime
Shape
The three possible options for the shape of the universe
Support of life
Composition
The universe is composed almost
completely of dark energy, dark matter,
and ordinary matter. Other contents are
electromagnetic radiation (estimated to
constitute from 0.005% to close to 0.01%
of the total mass-energy of the universe)
and antimatter.[91][92][93]
Comparison of the contents of the universe today to 380,000 years after the Big Bang as measured with 5 year WMAP data
(from 2008).[110] (Due to rounding errors, the sum of these numbers is not 100%). This reflects the 2008 limits of WMAP's
ability to define dark matter and dark energy.
The observable universe is isotropic on
scales significantly larger than
superclusters, meaning that the statistical
properties of the universe are the same in
all directions as observed from Earth. The
universe is bathed in highly isotropic
microwave radiation that corresponds to a
thermal equilibrium blackbody spectrum of
roughly 2.72548 kelvins.[7] The hypothesis
that the large-scale universe is
homogeneous and isotropic is known as
the cosmological principle.[111] A universe
that is both homogeneous and isotropic
looks the same from all vantage points[112]
and has no center.[113]
Dark energy
Ordinary matter
Particles
Standard model of elementary particles: the 12 fundamental fermions and 4 fundamental bosons. Brown loops indicate
which bosons (red) couple to which fermions (purple and green). Columns are three generations of matter (fermions) and
one of forces (bosons). In the first three columns, two rows contain quarks and two leptons. The top two rows' columns
contain up (u) and down (d) quarks, charm (c) and strange (s) quarks, top (t) and bottom (b) quarks, and photon (γ) and
gluon (g), respectively. The bottom two rows' columns contain electron neutrino (νe) and electron (e), muon neutrino (νμ)
and muon (μ), tau neutrino (ντ) and tau (τ), and the Z 0 and W± carriers of the weak force. Mass, charge, and spin are listed
for each particle.
Hadrons
Leptons
A lepton is an elementary, half-integer spin
particle that does not undergo strong
interactions but is subject to the Pauli
exclusion principle; no two leptons of the
same species can be in exactly the same
state at the same time.[137] Two main
classes of leptons exist: charged leptons
(also known as the electron-like leptons),
and neutral leptons (better known as
neutrinos). Electrons are stable and the
most common charged lepton in the
universe, whereas muons and taus are
unstable particles that quickly decay after
being produced in high energy collisions,
such as those involving cosmic rays or
carried out in particle accelerators.[138][139]
Charged leptons can combine with other
particles to form various composite
particles such as atoms and positronium.
The electron governs nearly all of
chemistry, as it is found in atoms and is
directly tied to all chemical properties.
Neutrinos rarely interact with anything, and
are consequently rarely observed.
Neutrinos stream throughout the universe
but rarely interact with normal matter.[140]
Cosmological models
Multiverse hypotheses
Historical conceptions
Historically, there have been many ideas of
the cosmos (cosmologies) and its origin
(cosmogonies). Theories of an impersonal
universe governed by physical laws were
first proposed by the Greeks and
Indians.[13] Ancient Chinese philosophy
encompassed the notion of the universe
including both all of space and all of
time.[168] Over the centuries, improvements
in astronomical observations and theories
of motion and gravitation led to ever more
accurate descriptions of the universe. The
modern era of cosmology began with
Albert Einstein's 1915 general theory of
relativity, which made it possible to
quantitatively predict the origin, evolution,
and conclusion of the universe as a whole.
Most modern, accepted theories of
cosmology are based on general relativity
and, more specifically, the predicted Big
Bang.[169]
Mythologies
Philosophical models
Astronomical concepts
3rd century BCE calculations by Aristarchus on the relative sizes of, from left to right, the Sun, Earth, and Moon, from a 10th-
century AD Greek copy
The earliest written records of identifiable
predecessors to modern astronomy come
from Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia
from around 3000 to 1200 BCE.[182][183]
Babylonian astronomers of the 7th century
BCE viewed the world as a flat disk
surrounded by the ocean,[184][185] and this
forms the premise for early Greek maps
like those of Anaximander and Hecataeus
of Miletus.
Model of the Copernican Universe by Thomas Digges in 1576, with the amendment that the stars are no longer confined to
a sphere, but spread uniformly throughout the space surrounding the planets
— Nicolaus Copernicus, in
Chapter 10, Book 1 of De
Revolutionibus Orbium
Coelestrum (1543)
As noted by Copernicus himself, the notion
that the Earth rotates is very old, dating at
least to Philolaus (c. 450 BC), Heraclides
Ponticus (c. 350 BC) and Ecphantus the
Pythagorean. Roughly a century before
Copernicus, the Christian scholar Nicholas
of Cusa also proposed that the Earth
rotates on its axis in his book, On Learned
Ignorance (1440).[202] Al-Sijzi[203] also
proposed that the Earth rotates on its axis.
Empirical evidence for the Earth's rotation
on its axis, using the phenomenon of
comets, was given by Tusi (1201–1274)
and Ali Qushji (1403–1474).[204]
This cosmology was accepted by Isaac
Newton, Christiaan Huygens and later
scientists.[205] Newton demonstrated that
the same laws of motion and gravity apply
to earthly and to celestial matter, making
Aristotle's division between the two
obsolete. Edmund Halley (1720)[206] and
Jean-Philippe de Chéseaux (1744)[207]
noted independently that the assumption
of an infinite space filled uniformly with
stars would lead to the prediction that the
nighttime sky would be as bright as the
Sun itself; this became known as Olbers'
paradox in the 19th century.[208] Newton
believed that an infinite space uniformly
filled with matter would cause infinite
forces and instabilities causing the matter
to be crushed inwards under its own
gravity.[205] This instability was clarified in
1902 by the Jeans instability criterion.[209]
One solution to these paradoxes is the
Charlier Universe, in which the matter is
arranged hierarchically (systems of
orbiting bodies that are themselves
orbiting in a larger system, ad infinitum) in
a fractal way such that the universe has a
negligibly small overall density; such a
cosmological model had also been
proposed earlier in 1761 by Johann
Heinrich Lambert.[54][210]
During the 18th century, Immanuel Kant
speculated that nebulae could be entire
galaxies separate from the Milky Way,[206]
and in 1850, Alexander von Humboldt
called these separate galaxies Weltinseln,
or "world islands", a term that later
developed into "island universes".[211][212]
In 1919, when the Hooker Telescope was
completed, the prevailing view still was
that the universe consisted entirely of the
Milky Way Galaxy. Using the Hooker
Telescope, Edwin Hubble identified
Cepheid variables in several spiral nebulae
and in 1922–1923 proved conclusively that
Andromeda Nebula and Triangulum
among others, were entire galaxies outside
our own, thus proving that universe
consists of a multitude of galaxies.[213]
See also
Cosmic Calendar (scaled down timeline)
Cosmic latte
Detailed logarithmic timeline
Earth's location in the universe
False vacuum
Future of an expanding universe
Galaxy And Mass Assembly survey
Heat death of the universe
History of the center of the Universe
Illustris project
Non-standard cosmology
Nucleocosmochronology
Parallel universe (fiction)
Rare Earth hypothesis
Space and survival
Terasecond and longer
Timeline of the early universe
Timeline of the far future
Timeline of the near future
Zero-energy universe
References
Footnotes
a. According to modern physics, particularly
the theory of relativity, space and time are
intrinsically linked as spacetime.
b. Although listed in megaparsecs by the
cited source, this number is so vast that its
digits would remain virtually unchanged for
all intents and purposes regardless of
which conventional units it is listed in,
whether it to be nanometres or
gigaparsecs, as the differences would
disappear into the error.
Citations
Bibliography
Bartel, Leendert van der Waerden
(1987). "The Heliocentric System in
Greek, Persian and Hindu Astronomy".
Annals of the New York Academy of
Sciences. 500 (1): 525–45.
Bibcode:1987NYASA.500..525V (https://
ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987NYASA.
500..525V) . doi:10.1111/j.1749-
6632.1987.tb37224.x (https://doi.org/1
0.1111%2Fj.1749-6632.1987.tb37224.
x) . S2CID 222087224 (https://api.sema
nticscholar.org/CorpusID:222087224) .
Landau L, Lifshitz E (1975). The Classical
Theory of Fields (Course of Theoretical
Physics). Vol. 2 (revised 4th English ed.).
New York: Pergamon Press. pp. 358–97.
ISBN 978-0-08-018176-9.
Liddell, H. G. & Scott, R. (1968). A Greek-
English Lexicon. Oxford University Press.
ISBN 978-0-19-864214-5.
Misner; C.W.; Thorne; Kip; Wheeler; J.A.
(1973). Gravitation. San Francisco: W. H.
Freeman. pp. 703–816. ISBN 978-0-
7167-0344-0.
Raine, D. J.; Thomas, E. G. (2001). An
Introduction to the Science of
Cosmology. Institute of Physics
Publishing.
Rindler, W. (1977). Essential Relativity:
Special, General, and Cosmological. New
York: Springer Verlag. pp. 193–244.
ISBN 978-0-387-10090-6.
Rees, Martin, ed. (2012). Smithsonian
Universe (2nd ed.). London: Dorling
Kindersley. ISBN 978-0-7566-9841-6.
External links
Universe
at Wikipedia's sister projects
Definitions
from
Wiktionary
Media from
Commons
Quotations
from
Wikiquote
NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database
(NED) (http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/) /
(NED-Distances (http://ned.ipac.caltech.
edu/Library/Distances/) ).
There are about 1082 atoms in the
observable universe (https://www.livesci
ence.com/how-many-atoms-in-univers
e.html) – LiveScience, July 2021.
This is why we will never know everything
about our universe (https://www.forbes.c
om/sites/startswithabang/2019/05/21/
this-is-why-we-will-never-know-everythin
g-about-our-universe/) – Forbes, May
2019.
Retrieved from
"https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?
title=Universe&oldid=1146283599"