0% found this document useful (0 votes)
113 views6 pages

Math 103 HW 9 Solutions To Selected Problems

1) The document provides solutions to selected math problems from homework 9. 2) Problem 4 shows that the groups U(8) and U(10) are not isomorphic by examining their elements and cyclic properties. 3) Problem 12 proves that the mapping α(g) = g-1 for all g in a group G is an automorphism if and only if G is Abelian.

Uploaded by

kevin lulu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
113 views6 pages

Math 103 HW 9 Solutions To Selected Problems

1) The document provides solutions to selected math problems from homework 9. 2) Problem 4 shows that the groups U(8) and U(10) are not isomorphic by examining their elements and cyclic properties. 3) Problem 12 proves that the mapping α(g) = g-1 for all g in a group G is an automorphism if and only if G is Abelian.

Uploaded by

kevin lulu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Math 103 HW 9 Solutions to Selected Problems

4. Show that U (8) is not isomorphic to U (10).

Solution: Unfortunately, the two groups have the same order: the elements are U (n)
are just the coprime elements of Zn , so U (8) = {1, 3, 5, 7} while U (10) = {1.3.7.9}.
Thus, we must examine the elements further. We claim that U (10) is cyclic. This is
easy to calculate:

32 ≡ 9
33 = 27
≡7
4
3 ≡3·7
≡ 1 (mod 10)

which means 3 generates U (10).

Now if U (10) and U (8) were isomorphic, we have seen that this would mean U (8) was
cyclic as well. In particular, it would have a generator of order 4. However, we can see
that

32 = 9
≡1
2
5 = 25
≡1
2
7 = 49
≡ 1 (mod 8)

so every element of U (8) has order dividing 2. Therefore, U (8) is not cyclic, hence is not
isomorphic to U (10).

12. Let G be a group. Prove that the mapping α(g) = g −1 for all g in G is an
automorphism if and only if G is Abelian.

1
Solution: α is clearly its own inverse, so it is always a bijective map. The only question
is whether it is a morphism of groups, so it is enough to show this is true if and only if
G is Abelian. If G is Abelian, then certainly

α(gh) = (gh)−1
= h−1 g −1
= g −1 h−1
= α(g)α(h)

since we can commute elements, so α is a morphism. On the other hand, by definition


α being a morphism is equivalent to (gh)−1 = g −1 h−1 for every g, h ∈ G. By problem
25 from Homework 4, this implies that G is Abelian. Putting the two together, we have
our result.

17. If G is a group, prove that Aut(G) and Inn(G) are groups.

Solution: We first show that each has an identity. The operation is function composi-
tion, so the identity here is just the identity function idG on G. This is certainly bijective,
and it is a morphism simply because G is a group. This shows idG ∈ Aut(G). Function
composition is also associative (see Theorem 0.8.1), we know that the composition of
bijective functions is bijective, and it easy to check that the composition of morphisms is
again a morphism 1 . Thus, Aut(G) is closed under multiplication. It remains to show it
is closed under inversion. We know at least that the function α−1 exists for α ∈ Aut(G)
(since bijective is equivalent to invertible). If we let g, h be in G, then

α−1 (gh) = α−1 (α(α−1 (g))α(α−1 (h))


= α−1 (α(α−1 (g)α−1 (h))) (since α is a morphism)
= α−1 (g)α−1 (h)

meaning α−1 is actually in Aut(G). This shows that Aut(G) is a group.

Inn(G) is defined as a subset of Aut(G), so we need not show associativity again. For
any g ∈ G, ege = g, so idG = φe , which is certainly an element of Inn(G). Furthermore,

φg φh (x) = φg (hxh−1 )
= ghxh−1 g −1
= φgh (x)

for each x ∈ G, so φg φh = φgh is in Inn(G). In particular, this show thats φg φg−1 =


φg−1 φg = φe , the identity, so (φg )−1 = φg−1 . Thus Inn(G) is closed under multiplication
and taking inverses, and contains the identity, so it is indeed a subgroup of Aut(G).

1
that is, if α and β are two morphisms from G to G, α(β(gh)) = α(β(gh)) = α(β(g)β(h)) =
α(β(g))α(β(h))

Page 2
24. Let φ be an automorphism of a group G. Prove that H = {x ∈ G|φ(x) = x} is
a subgroup of G.

Solution: For any morphism G → G, φ(e) = e, meaning e ∈ H. Since φ is a morphism,


if x, y ∈ H, φ(xy) = φ(x)φ(y) = xy, so xy ∈ H as well. We also know that φ(g)−1 =
φ(g −1 ) for all g ∈ G, so x ∈ H implies φ(x−1 ) = φ(x)−1 = x−1 ; ie, x−1 ∈ H. Thus, H is
a subgroup.

26. Suppose that φ : Z20 → Z20 is an automorphism and φ(5) = 5. What are the
possiblities for φ(x)?

Solution: Note that since Z20 is cyclic, generated by 1, φ is completely determined by


φ(1): φ(x) = φ(x · 1) = x · φ(1) since φ is a morphism. This shows that the morphisms
from Z20 to itself are precisely given by φm (x) = mx for m ∈ Z20 (this is a morphism
because φ(x + y) = m(x + y) = mx + my). To be an automorphism, it is enough for
φm (1) = m to generate Z20 , since for finite sets, surjective implies bijective. This means
that m must be coprime to 20. Let our φ be one of these φm . The only other constraint
we have is that φ(5) = 5 in Z20 ; that is, 5m ≡ 5 (mod 20). But we know this is true if
and only if 20 divides 5m − 5 = 5(m − 1), or in other words 4 divides m − 1. Checking
×
all the members of Z20 , we see that the only m satisfying this condition are m = 1, 9, 13
and 17, so these are the only possibilities for φ(x) = mx.
  
1 a
30. The group a ∈ Z is isomorphic to what familiar group? What if Z
0 1
is replaced by R?

Solution: Let G be this group (implicit here is that the operation is matrix multiplica-
tion). We claim that G is isomorphic
 to Z. To this end, we try to use the easiest map
1 a
φ : G → Z possible, given by φ( ) = a. This is a morphism because
0 1
     
1 a 1 b 1 a+b
φ( ) ) = φ( )
0 1 0 1 0 1
=a+b
   
1 a 1 b
= φ( ) + φ( )
0 1 0 1
 
1 a
On the other hand, we can see that φ is invertible: if we let ψ : Z → G, a 7→ ,
    0 1
1 a 1 a
then certainly ψ ◦ φ( )= and φ ◦ ψ(a) = a for all a ∈ Z, so ψ = φ−1 .
0 1 0 1
Thus, φ is an isomorphism. Nothing about our proof relied on any properties of Z,
besides that it had an additive structure, so, , replacing Z with R everywhere, it would
work for R as well.

Page 3
38. Let √
G = {a + b 2| a, b are rational}
and   
a 2b
H= a, b are rational .
b a
Show that G and H are isomorphic under addition. Prove that G and H are
closed under multiplication. Does your isomorphism preserve multiplication
as well as addition?


 
a 2b
Solution: Define φ : H → G by φ( ) = a + b 2 (which is in G since a, b ∈
b a
Q). This is definitely surjective, so we must show it is an injective morphism. Given
a, b, c, d ∈ Q,
     
a 2b c 2d a + c 2(b + d)
φ( + ) = φ(
b a d c b+d a+c

= (a + c) + (b + d) 2
√ √
=a+b 2+c+d 2
   
a 2b c 2d
= φ( ) + φ( )
b a d c

as desired, hence φ is a morphism. As we  provedin section 2 , φ being injective is equiv-


0 0
alent to saying that φ(h) = 0 implies h = (the identity in H) for any h ∈ H. In
0 0


a 2b
other words, we must show that (letting h = ) if a, b ∈ Q, a + b 2 = 0 implies
b a
√ √
a = b = 0. Suppose√ not; then a = −b 2,
√ so b must not be 0 or else a = 0 2 = 0.
a
But then − b = 2, meaning we can write 2 as the quotient of two rational numbers.

This forces 2 itself to be rational, as Q is a field (so closed under division by nonzero√
elements). However, it is well known (for example, often proved in Math 109) that 2
is irrational, so we must have a = b = 0 after all.

G is closed under multiplication, as


√ √ √
(a + b 2)(c + d 2) = ac + 2bd + (ad + bc) 2

which is in G since the rationals are closed under multiplication and addition. What’s
more,     
a 2b c 2d ac + 2bd 2(bc + ad)
=
b a d c (bc + ad) ac + 2bd
which is in H for the same reasons. This shows that H is closed under multiplication,
and also that φ preserves multiplication.
2
and is useful to prove yourself if you didn’t go to section

Page 4
44. Suppose that G is a finite Abelian group and G has no element of order 2.
Show that the mapping g 7→ g 2 is an automorphism of G. Show, by example,
that there is an infinite Abelian group for which the mapping g 7→ g 2 is
one-to-one and operation preserving but not an automorphism.

Solution: Call this map α. Since G is Abelian, α(gh) = ghgh = g 2 h2 ∀g, h ∈ G, hence
α is a morphism. Suppose α(g) = e. Then either g = e or g has order 2, so by assump-
tion we must have g = e. By the fact mentioned in the previous problem, this is enough
to show α is injective. As G is finite, injective implies bijective, so α is an automorphism.

Now consider the infinite Abelian group Z. In additive notation, α : Z → Z is de-


fined by α(x) = 2x. We know that every element of Z has infinite order except the
identity, so the proof above still works to show that α is an injective morphism (or we
can just divide the equation 2x = 2y by 2). However, injective does not imply bijective
in this case: the image of α is the even integers, which definitely isn’t all of Z. Therefore,
α is not surjective, and hence cannot be an automorphism.

55. Let φ be an automorphism of C∗ , the group of nonzero complex numbers


under multiplication. Determine φ(−1). Determine the possibilities for φ(i).

Solution: We have seen that isomorphisms preserve orders, and so (−1)2 = 1 implies
that φ(−1) has order 2. What are the elements of order 2 in C∗ ? Such an element—call
it x—must be a solution to x2 − 1 = 0, which factorizes as (x − 1)(x + 1) = 0. We cannot
have x = 1 since 1 has order 1, so we can divide by (the nonzero) x − 1 to get x + 1 = 0;
ie, x = −1. Thus, the only option is φ(−1) = −1.

Similarly, i2 = −1, i3 = −i, and i4 = 1, so φ(i) must have the same order, 4, as i.
The elements of order 4 are solutions in C∗ to x4 − 1 = 0, which we can factorize as

0 = x4 − 1
= (x2 − 1)(x2 + 1)
= (x − 1)(x + 1)(x − i)(x + i)

By the same reasoning as above, this means that the elements of order 4 must be ±1 or
±i. The former do not have order 4, and −i has order 4 too (for example, because it’s
i−1 ), so φ(i) must be ±i.

64. Prove that Q, the group of rational numbers under addition, is not isomorphic
to a proper subgroup of itself.

Solution: Let φ : Q → H be an isomorphism with a subgroup H of Q. We want to


show that H = Q. However, if x, y are ∈ Z, φ(x) = x · φ(1), while φ( xy ) (if y 6= 0)
is equal to xφ( y1 ), which—since φ(1) = φ(y · y1 ) = yφ( y1 )—must be xy φ(1). This shows
that φ is completely determined by φ(1), and in fact that φ is just multiplication by φ(1).

Page 5
φ is an isomorphism, so in particular it must be injective, with φ(1) 6= 0. But then
g
for any g ∈ Q, φ( φ(1) ) = g, so the image of φ is Q. Since im(φ) is contained in H almost
by definition, this forces H = Q, so H cannot be a proper subgroup.

Page 6

You might also like