Syllabus

Foundations of
Canadian Law

(Revised for 2022)

Candidates are advised that the syllabus may be updated from

time-to-time without prior notice.

Candidates are responsible for obtaining the

most current syllabus available.

World Exchange Plaza 1810 - 45 O'Connor Street Ottawa Ontario K1P 1A4
Tel: (613) 236-1700 Fax: (613) 236-7233 www.flsc.ca
 Foundations of Canadian Law

OBJECTIVES OF THE COURSE

➢ To provide NCA applicants with an introduction to and an overview of Canada’s legal system
and the role of law in Canadian society;
➢ To review various legal theories as they apply to Canadian law;
➢ To introduce the overarching legal framework within which the particular areas of law studied
in other courses operate;
➢ To acquaint applicants with the various sources of Canadian law;
➢ To compare the different branches of Canadian government and to analyze the relationships
between and among them;
➢ To provide applicants with an understanding of the Canadian treaty-making process and the
implementation of international law into domestic law;
➢ To provide applicants with an understanding of the special relationship Aboriginal Peoples
have with the Canadian State, and to enable applicants to critically assess the impact of the
Canadian legal system upon Aboriginal and other minority communities;
➢ To provide applicants with an understanding of the nature and function of judicial review and
of the basic approaches to statutory interpretation

EVALUATION:

Evaluation for this course is based on a 100% open book examination.

The exam will consist of short answer questions, and/or essay questions, and/or problem
questions, and/or multiple-choice questions.

Short answer questions and multiple-choice questions test candidates’ ability to

succinctly evaluate statements about material covered in the syllabus.

Essay questions test whether candidates have critically engaged with the material listed
in the syllabus and have started to form their own opinions about the strengths and
weaknesses of the arguments, principles, and doctrines discussed in those materials.

Problem questions test candidates’ ability to identify legal issues, accurately state the
applicable legal rules, apply those rules to novel situations, and draw conclusions
supported by analysis. In other words, problem questions require the exercise of
independent judgment grounded in the application of general rules to specific fact
situations
CORE MATERIALS

1. Forcese, Dodek et al, Public Law: Cases, Commentary, and Analysis, Fourth
Edition(Toronto: Emond Montgomery, 2020). [Referred to below as “Forcese”.]
www.emond.ca/public-law-cases-commentary-and-analysis-4th-edition.html

2. Prescribed cases that are not included in the Forcese text are available free of charge
from CanLII: www.canlii.ca/

3. Prescribed articles that are not included in the Forcese text are available online free of
charge (website address is specified).

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS

For those interested in reading further on these topics, you may wish to consult the following list
of sources, available at most Canadian law libraries:

Gerald Heckman. “International Human Rights Norms and the Substantive Review of
Administrative Decision-Making” (Chapter 14 of Flood and Daly, eds., Administrative Law
in Context, 4th Edition, Emond Montgomery 2021)
Eisenberg, M., The Nature of the Common Law, (Cambridge, Mass: HUP, 1991)
Fairlie, John & Philip Sworden, Introduction to Law in Canada, 2nd ed. (Toronto: Emond
Montgomery 2019)
Forcese, Craig & Aaron Freeman. The Laws of Government: The Legal Foundations of
Canadian Democracy, 2nd Edition (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2011).
Forsey, Eugene A. How Canadians Govern Themselves, 10th ed. (Ottawa: Library of
Parliament, 2020): https://lop.parl.ca/about/parliament/senatoreugeneforsey/book/preface-
e.html
Sasha Baglay, Introduction to the Canadian Legal System, (Toronto: Pearson, 2015)
Hogg, Peter W. Constitutional Law of Canada, 2019 Student Edition (Toronto: Carswell,
2019).
Justice Canada, “Canada’s System of Justice”: www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/
Schauer, F., Thinking Like a Lawyer: A New Introduction to Legal Reasoning, (Cambridge,
Mass: HUP, 2012)
Waddams, S.M., Introduction to the Study of Law, 8th Edition, (Toronto: Carswell, 2016)
COMPONENTS:

1. Basic Theories of Law; Racism & the Law

Positivism and Natural Law

Feminist Perspectives on Law
Critical Legal Studies
Law and Economics

Required Readings:
• Forcese, Chapter 2
• R. v. Morris, 2021 ONCA 680
• 8573123 Canada Inc. v. Keele Sheppard Plaza Inc. 2021 ONCA 371
• R. v. Gladue [1999] 1 S.C.R.

2. Indigenous Peoples and the Law

Aboriginal Rights and Title

Indigenous Self-Government Aspirations
The Modern Treaty-Making Process

A. Required Readings:
• Forcese, Chapter 3
• Section 91(24) of The Constitution Act, 1867 (U.K.), 30 & 31 Victoria, c. 3
• Section 35 of The Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982
(U.K.), 1982, c. 11
• John Borrows, “Seven Gifts: Revitalizing Living Laws through Indigenous
Legal Practice”, (2016-2017) 2:1 Lakehead Law Journal:
https://llj.lakeheadu.ca/article/view/1490/825
• Don Couturier, “Judicial Reasoning Across Legal Orders: Lessons from Nunavut”
(2020) 45:2 Queen's Law Journal 319
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3687860

Page 4
 • “Introduction” in Summary of the Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation
Commission of Canada, Honouring the Truth, Reconciling for the Future, pp. 1-21:
http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2015/trc/IR4-7-2015-eng.pdf
• First Nations Child and Family Caring Society of Canada v. Attorney General of
Canada 2018 CHRT 4, paras 1-2, 114-195 and 451-53
• United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples:
https://undocs.org/A/RES/61/295
• An Act respecting the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous
Peoples https://parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/43-2/bill/C-15/royal-assent

B. Required Readings - Re: Aboriginal Rights:

• Chippewas of the Thames First Nation v. Enbridge Pipelines, [2017] 1 SCR
1099
• Clyde River (Hamlet) v. Petroleum Geo‑Services Inc., 2017 SCC 40
• Mikisew Cree First Nation v. Canada (Governor General in Council), 2018
SCC
• Pastion v. Dene Tha’ First Nation, 2018 FC 648
• R. v. Desautel, 2021 SCC 17
• Scott Carrière, “Whose Sovereignty is it Anyway? The Borders of Aboriginal
Rights along the Sovereign Borders of Canada” (January 20, 2020):
https://ablawg.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Blog_SC_Desautel.pdf

C. Required Readings Re: Aboriginal Title:

• Kent McNeil, “The Factual Basis for Indigenous Land Rights” Monash
University Law Review, forthcoming:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3822713
• Newfoundland and Labrador (Attorney General) v. Uashaunnuat (Innu of Uashat
and of Mani Utenam), 2020 SCC 4
• Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia, 2014 SCC 44
• Daniels v. Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development), 2016 SCC 12
• Brown v. Canada (Attorney General) 2017 ONSC 251
 D. Required Readings - Re: Aboriginal Treaties:
• Restoule v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 ONCA 779, paras. 1-333, 360, 581-
628
• Darcy Lindberg, “Historical Lawsuit Affirms Indigenous Laws on Par with Canada’s”,
The Conversation (16 January 2019): https://theconversation.com/historical-lawsuit-
affirms-indigenous-laws-on-par-with-canadas-109711

3. Sources of Canadian Law

The Common Law and Civil Law Traditions

i. Reception of European Law
ii. Bijuralism
iii. Common Law Method: Precedent and Equity
Statutory Law
International Law

Required Readings:
• Forcese, Chapter 4
• Grimard v. Canada [2009] FCA 47
• Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto, [1995] 2 SCR 1130
• Debra Parkes, “Precedent Revisited: Carter v Canada (AG) and the Contemporary
Practice of Precedent” (2016) 10 McGill Journal of Law and Health 123:
https://mjlhmcgill.files.wordpress.com/2017/07/mjlh_10_1_parkes1.pdf
• Cass R. Sunstein, “Analogical Reasoning” (October 7, 2021):
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3938546
• Tan v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FCA 186
• Henry E Smith, “Equity as Meta-Law” (2021) 130:5 Yale LJ 1050:
https://www.yalelawjournal.org/pdf/Smith_i8qnzgea.pdf
• Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 817
(read headnote for factual context, read paras. 69-71, 78-81)
• R. v. Hape 2007 SCC 26, [2007] 2 SCR 292, (read paras. 1-56)
• Nevsun Resources Ltd. v. Araya, 2020 SCC 5, (read paras. 1-26; and 60-133)
• Gib Van Ert, “Canada” in Sloss and Jinks (eds.), The Role of Domestic Courts in
Treaty Enforcement: A Comparative Study (Cambridge University Press, 2009)
www.litigationchambers.com/pdf/vanErt-domestic-courts.pdf
 • Reference re Supreme Court Act, ss. 5 and 6, 2014 SCC 21, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 433,
paras. 1-12 and 72-107

4. Fundamental Principles of the Canadian Legal System:

The Constitution of Canada

Principles Underpinning
Public Law
i. Rule of Law
ii. Constitutional Supremacy
iii. Parliamentary Sovereignty
iv. Federalism
v. Separation of Powers
vi. Judicial Independence (Overview)

Constitutional Amendment

Required Readings:
• Forcese, Chapter 5
• Singh v. Canada (Attorney General), 2000 CanLII 17100 (F.C.A.), paras. 13-44
• Leonid Sirota, “A Citizen's Guide to the Rule of Law” in Peter L Biro (ed), Constitutional
Democracy under Stress: A Time for Heroic Citizenship (Mosaic Press, 2020) 104
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3656775
• Alyn James Johnson, “The Judges Reference and the Secession Reference at Twenty:
Reassessing the Supreme Court of Canada's Unfinished Unwritten Constitutional
Principles Project”, 2019 56-4 Alberta Law Review 1077: www.canlii.org/t/skqd

5. Parliament and its Components

The Monarch and Governor General

Senate
House of Commons

Required Readings:
• Forcese, Chapter 6
• Andre Barnes et al., “Reforming the Senate of Canada: Frequently Asked Questions”,
Background Paper, Library of Parliament (2011): www.deslibris.ca/ID/230487
6. Functions of Parliament

Summoning
Prorogation
Dissolution
Key Actors
Parliamentary Procedure and Law-Making

Required Readings:
• Forcese, Chapter 7
• Duffy v. Senate of Canada, 2020 ONCA 536
• Chagnon v. Syndicat de la fonction publique et parapublique du Québec, 2018 SCC 39
• Singh v. Attorney General of Quebec, 2018 QCCA 257

7. The Executive and its Functions

The Functions of the Executive

Sources of Executive Power
Executive Institutions and the Political Executive

Required Readings:
• Forcese, Chapter 8
• Lorne Sossin, “The Puzzle of Independence and Parliamentary Democracy in the
Common Law World” in Susan Rose-Ackerman et al, Comparative Administrative Law,
2nd ed., (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017)
https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/area/conference/compadmin/compadmin16_sossi
n_puzzle.pdf
• Tesla Motors Canada v. Ontario (Ministry of Transportation), 2018 ONSC 5062 (CanLII)
• Toronto (City) v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2021 SCC 34 (CanLII)

8. The Courts and the Judiciary

Structure of the Canadian Court System

Judicial Appointments
Judicial Independence
 Required Readings:
• Forcese, Chapter 9
• Smith v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 629

9. Statutory Interpretation

Approaches to Interpretation
The Modern Approach to Interpretation

Required Readings:
• Forcese, Chapter 10, pp. 408-516
• Ruth Sullivan, “Some Problems with the Shared Meaning Rule as Formulated in
R v Daoust and The Law of Bilingual Interpretation” (2010) 42:1 Ottawa Law
Review 71 www.canlii.org/t/28dw
• Mark Mancini, “The Purpose Error in the Modern Approach to Statutory Interpretation”
Alberta Law Review, forthcoming
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3947396

10. Constraints on Legislative and Administrative Action

Judicial Review in a Democratic Society

Judicial Review of Administrative Action

Required Readings:
• Forcese, Chapter 11
• Brown v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2020 FCA 130 (read paras. 1-23; and
136-149)
• Shuttleworth v. Ontario (Safety, Licensing Appeals and Standards Tribunals),
2019 ONCA 518
• Highwood Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses (Judicial Committee) v. Wall,
2018 SCC 26
• Glover Berger, Kate. "The Missing Constitutionalism of Canada v Vavilov."
Journal of Law and Social Policy 34. (2021): 68-93.
https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/jlsp/vol34/iss1/4/
• Lorne Sossin, The Impact of Vavilov: Reasonableness and Vulnerability"
Supreme Court Law Review, 2nd Series, Volume 100 (2021) pp. 265-277
https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1421&cont
ext=sclr

• Paul Daly, “Vavilov and the Culture of Justification in Contemporary Administrative

Law” (June 3, 2020): https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3618743
 Canadian Publishers

Carswell (Thomson Reuters) Tel: 416.609.3800 or 1.800.387.5164

Corporate Plaza Email: [email protected]
2075 Kennedy Road URL: http://www.carswell.com/
Scarborough, ON M1T 3V4
Irwin Law Inc. Tel: (Canada & U.S.) 416.862.7690 or 1.888.314.9014
14 Duncan St. Fax: 416.862.9236
Toronto, ON M5H 3G8 Email: [email protected]
URL: http://www.irwinlaw.com/

Emond Montgomery Tel: 416.975.3925

60 Shaftesbury Ave. Fax: 416.975.3924
Toronto, ON M4T 1A3 Email: [email protected]
URL: http://www.emp.ca/

Lexis Nexis Canada Inc. Contact: Customer Service

(For printed material only and Tel: 905.415.5823 or 1.800.668.6481
not for access to Quicklaw) Fax: 905.479.4082 or 1.800.461.3275
Email: [email protected]
URL:http://www.lexisnexis.ca/en-ca/home.page

Canada Law Books Tel: (Canada & U.S.) 416.609.3800 or 1.800.387.5164

240 Edward St. Email: [email protected]
Toronto, ON L4G 3S9 URL: http://www.carswell.com/

Online Resources

The majority of case law and legislative resources needed by NCA students are available on CanLII, the
free legal information resource funded by the Federation of Law Societies of Canada (www.canlii.org).
That includes all decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada, and all federal, provincial, territorial and
appellate courts.

Your registration fee also includes free access to the Quicklaw resources of Lexis Nexis. Your ID and
password will be arranged and emailed to your email address on file a few weeks after the end of the
registration session.

Sign in to Quicklaw via http://www.lexisnexis.com/ca/legal. The first time you sign in to Quicklaw you
will be asked to change or personalize your password. Remember your User ID and password are
personal, and should not be shared with anyone.

If you forget or lose your password to Quicklaw you may retrieve it by clicking on the “Forget Password?”
link on the Quicklaw sign-in page. Any other issues please Email [email protected].

Please review and abide by all Terms of Use when you receive your Quicklaw credentials, otherwise your
Quicklaw account will be closed without any prior notice.

Lexis Nexis Quicklaw customer support is available via [email protected], or calling

1.800.387.0899.

Page 11