09th NCT MoM
09th NCT MoM
6 Supply and Installation of OPGW on existing main lines which are to be LILOed under
various transmission schemes. ............................................................................................. 37
Summary of the deliberations of the 09th NCT meeting held on 28.09.2022. ........................ 39
Minutes of the 9th meeting of National Committee on Transmission (NCT) held
on 28.09.2022
1.1 Member Secretary, NCT, stated that the minutes of the 8th meeting of NCT held
on 25.03.2022 was issued vide CEA letter no CEA-PS-11-15(11)/1/20-PSPA-I
dated 05.05.2022. Further, corrigendum to the minutes was issued vide CEA
letter no.CEA-PS-11-15(11)/1/2020-PSPA-I Division/258 dated 13.06.2022.
1.2 The minutes of 8th meeting of NCT along with the corrigendum dated
13.06.2022 were confirmed.
2.1 Transmission scheme for Solar Energy Zone in Gadag (1500 MW),
Karnataka: Part A Phase-II
2.1.1 Member Secretary, NCT, stated that in the revised scope of works for
“Transmission scheme for Solar Energy Zone in Gadag (1500MW),
Karnataka: Part A Phase-II” (approved in the 8th meeting of NCT held on
25.03.2022), provision for bus sectionalizer at 220 kV level was not included
in the scope of works. However, during the preparation of RfP document for
the scheme, it was observed that provision for total 12 no of bays at 220 kV
level (present as well as future) had been approved at Gadag Pooling station
(Phase I & Phase II). As per CEA Manual on Transmission Planning Criteria,
there can be a maximum of eight (8) feeders in one section at 220 kV level.
Keeping in view that 4 no of 220 kV bays are already under implementation
under Gadag Phase-I scheme, it was necessary to incorporate the provision
of bus sectionaliser at 220 kV level in the RfP document of Gadag Phase-II
scheme
2.1.2 In line with the same, CTU vide letter no. C/CTU/S/03/NCT dated 15.06.2022
had requested for inclusion of 220 kV bus sectionalizer bay along with
associated Bus Coupler (BC) & Transfer Bus Coupler (TBC) bays at Gadag
PS in the scope of works for Transmission scheme for Solar Energy Zone in
Gadag (1500MW), Karnataka: Part A Phase-II.
2.1.3 As the scheme was already under bidding, following revised scope of works
was communicated to the BPC:
Sl. Scope of the Transmission Capacity / line length km
No. Scheme
1. 400/220 kV, 3x500 MVA ICT 400/220 kV, 500 MVA ICT – 3
Augmentation at Gadag 400 kV ICT bays – 3
Pooling Station 220 kV ICT bays – 3
220 kV line bays – 4
220kV sectionalization bay: 1 set
220kV Bus Coupler (BC) bay: 1
220kV Transfer Bus Coupler (TBC) bay - 1
2. Gadag PS-Koppal PS 400 kV Length – 60
(high capacity equivalent to
quad moose) D/c line
3. 400 kV line bays at Gadag PS Line bays – 4 (2 each at Gadag PS &
and Koppal PS for Gadag PS- Koppal PS)
Koppal PS 400 kV D/c line
2.1.4 Members noted the above revised scope of Transmission scheme for Solar
Energy Zone in Gadag (1500MW), Karnataka: Part A Phase-II. Chairperson,
CEA, opined that the transmission schemes must be formulated with utmost
care and modifications at later stage must be avoided.
2.2.2 CTU informed that in the survey report shared by BPC, with the identified
Bhadla-III PS location, there is significant increase in the length of Fatehgarh-
III PS - Bhadla-III PS 400 kV D/c line and Fatehgarh-II PS - Bhadla-III PS 400
kV D/c line from the tentative length approved in the 5th NCT meeting (i.e.
200 km to around 274 km and 243 km respectively). Therefore, the line
reactive compensation agreed with the earlier line lengths also need to
be revised. Further, as part of Rajasthan Phase-III schemes, establishment of
Ramgarh S/s was approved under Phase-III Part C1 package in the 5th NCT.
However, future space provision for STATCOM (± 2x300 MVAr, 4x125 MVAr
MSC, 2x125 MVAr MSR) at Ramgarh S/s was inadvertently missed in the
above package. Since the Package Phase-III Part C1 is under bidding, the
same can be included in the future provision under Scope of works of
Ramgarh S/s.
2.2.3 Dr. R. Saha, Expert Member NCT, raised the apprehension regarding very
less improvement in voltage profile with upgradation of capacity of Switchable
Line Reactors (SLR) from 50MVAr to 63MVAr. He stated that for substantial
improvement in voltage profile, upgrading the capacity of SLR to 125 MVAr
may be considered.
2.2.4 Representative of CTUIL stated that 63 MVAr is the optimum capacity chosen
for upgradation as any rating above 80 MVAr would result in
overcompensation of the transmission line. He further stated that
modifications/additional provisions proposed in the above table have been
intimated to BPCs for incorporation in the RfP document of the respective
transmission schemes.
2.2.5 Chairperson, CEA, and Chairman, NCT, stated that any change in the scope
of already notified schemes must be ratified by NCT.
2.2.6 NCT noted the modifications in the scope of works of Transmission system for
evacuation of power from REZ in Rajasthan (20 GW) Phase –III.
3.1 Member Secretary, NCT, presented the status of the transmission schemes
noted/approved/recommended in the 8 th meeting of NCT. The Updated status
is given below:
Sr. Name of the Noted/ Survey MoP BPC Status
No Transmission Recommended/ Agency approval
Scheme Approved
1. Inter-regional ER-WR Approved for RECPDCL Not RECPDCL RFP initiated on
Interconnection implementation required 21.09.2022.
through TBCB Bid deadline
23.11.2022.
2. Western Region Approved for Not Not CTUIL
Expansion Scheme- implementation applicable required
XXV (WRES-XXV) through RTM
3.2 Regarding transmission system for evacuation of power from Kaza Solar Power
Project (880 MW), Director, MoP, stated that SJVN had informed them about
land identification issues and involvement of forest land for which relaxation is
being sought.
CTUIL stated that NRPC has agreed for phasing of approved transmission
system for Kaza solar project.
After discussions, NCT decided that the Transmission system for evacuation of
power from Kaza Solar Power Project (880 MW) would be taken up once firm
commitment about timeline of commissioning of Kaza solar park is received
from SJVNL.
3.3 Chairperson, CEA, enquired about the reasons for delay in the issuance of RfP
documents by the BPC. It was informed that after issuance of minutes of NCT,
CTUIL (for schemes involving augmentation of exiting ISTS substation) obtains
requisite information/inputs like sub-station layout, upstream/downstream
elements etc. from the existing sub-station owner. CTUIL then prepares the
project specific Technical Requirements for substations, transmission lines and
communication system etc. to be incorporated in the RfP document of the
scheme. After CEA vets the inputs furnished by CTUIL, BPC issues the RfP. In
case intra-state sub-stations are involved, requisite information is obtained by
BPC. Sometimes delay in issuance of RfP is due to delay in information
provided by the existing substation owner.
3.4 Chairperson, CEA, directed Member Secretary, NCT, to take up the
standardization of the procedure, formats and timelines for preparation of
project specific technical inputs for RfP in consultation with BPCs and CTUIL in
order to minimize the duration between approval of schemes by NCT and
issuance of RfP by BPC.
3.5 CTUIL stated that the issue pertaining to the implementation timelines of the
TBCB projects also needs deliberation as time and again requests are received
from Industry Associations for increasing the implementation timeframe. While
the preliminary information regarding any wild life/protected area along the
planned transmission line route is provided by CTUIL in the agenda of NCT,
however, possibility of some uncertainties like avoiding prioritized zone of the
GIB potential area for Rajasthan Phase-III schemes, land acquisition and RoW
issues, difficult terrain etc. in case of RE linked schemes results in change in
scope and increase in estimated timelines and cost of the transmission
scheme. Keeping in view short gestation period of RE generation projects,
implementation timeframe for RE linked transmission schemes had been
agreed to be kept as 18 months. However, considering the recent cases of time
overrun, a holistic view with respect to the implementation timeframe needs to
be taken.
3.6 Member Secretary, NCT, suggested the deployment of features offered in PM-
GatiShakti portal for tentative routing of planned transmission lines through
forest, GIB areas, railway crossings etc. to work out the tentative route and
length of the transmission line. This will in turn help to work out the project
completion schedule and estimated cost. He further stated that as per MoP OM
dated 01st July, 2022, assuming the role of CTUIL as BPC, under Pre-bidding
activities of TBCB projects, CTUIL required to comply with the following:
CTU shall diligently carry out the route survey of approved ISTS schemes,
so that the routes are realistic and can be used by successful bidders
without much deviation.
The cost assessment for the approved ISTS shall be done accurately, so
that the estimated cost closely represents the cost of developing the ISTS.
For this, the cost data to be continuously compiled for various completed or
awarded projects.
CTU will initiate land acquisition for the proposed substation and initiate
process for other clearances including Railway/highway crossings etc.
4.1.2 Further, the scheme also comprises of provision of 220 kV line bays at the
following S/s:
(i) 4 nos. of 220kV line bays at Bahadurgarh (PG) for interconnection to 220
kV Kharkhoda pocket B (HVPN) and 220 kV METL (HVPN) S/s.
(ii) 2 nos. of 220 kV line bays at Sonepat (PG) for interconnection to 220kV
Kharkhoda pocket A (HVPN) S/s.
4.1.3 The estimated cost of scheme is about Rs. 117 Crs. As the estimated cost of
the scheme lies between Rs 100 to 500 Crore and works are of the nature of
technical upgradation (clause 7.1(7) of Tariff Policy, 2016), NCT approved the
scheme for implementation through RTM mode.
Sl. Name of the scheme/est. Decision of NCT Purpose /Justification
No. cost
1. Augmentation of ISTS for Approved for To provide ‘N-1’
interconnection of HVPNL implementation compliant system as well
transmission schemes through RTM as 220kV line bays for
mode - to be interconnection with
Est. Cost: Rs. 117.05 Crs. given to HVPNL transmission
POWERGRID schemes at various
Implementation timeframe: (as these ISTS substations.
Given in detailed scope. substations are
owned by
POWERGRID)
4.1.4 Detailed scope of the scheme alongwith implementation timeline is given
below:
Augmentation of ISTS for interconnection of HVPNL transmission schemes
i. Augmentation by 1x500 MVA, 400/220 kV ICT (3rd) at 400/220 kV Bahadurgarh
(PG) S/s -July, 24
400/220 kV, 500 MVA ICT – 1 no.
400 kV ICT bay – 1 no.
220 kV ICT bay – 1 no.
ii. 2 nos of 220 kV line bays at 400/220 kV Bahadurgarh (PG) S/s (for 220 kV
Kharkhoda pocket B- Bahadurgarh (PG) D/c line) – July, 24
220 kV line bays – 2 nos.
iii. 2 nos of 220 kV line bays at 400/220 kV Bahadurgarh (PG) S/s (for 220 kV
METL – Bahadurgarh (PG) D/c line) – March, 24
220 kV line bays – 2 nos.
iv. Augmentation by 1x500 MVA, 400/220 kV ICT (3rd) at 400/220 kV Jind (PG) S/s
– February, 24
400/220 kV, 500 MVA ICT – 1 no.
400 kV ICT bay – 1 no.
220 kV ICT bay – 1 no.
v. 2 nos of 220 kV line bays at 400/220 kV Sonepat (PG) S/s (for 220 kV D/c line
from Kharkhoda pocket A) - July, 24
220 kV line bays – 2 nos.
4.2 Scheme to relieve high loading of WR-NR Inter Regional Corridor (400 kV
Bhinmal-Zerda line):
CTUIL stated that initially the reconductoring was proposed with capacity of
2100MVA/ckt, however, POWERGRID informed them that the recent
experience of re-conductoring of various old lines based on HTLS conductor
design principles for 400KV Lines designed with ACSR Moose conductor for
85 Deg C, ampacity of around 1400A may be possible with GAP & Composite
Core type HTLS Conductor. For higher ampacity corresponding to 2100MVA
capacity, GAP type HTLS Conductor may not be suitable and Composite
Core type HTLS conductor may be the only option. It was also mentioned that
the Composite Core type HTLS conductors is very costly (around 3 times to
that of equivalent ACSR), whereas, GAP is economical (around 1.5 times to
that of equivalent ACSR). With ampacity requirement of 1400A, possibility of
GAP & Composite core type HTLS conductor may facilitate larger vendor
base leading to better competition & fair price discovery. In case of higher
ampacity, limited vendors of Composite core conductor may lead to reduced
competition. With 1400 Ampacity, 400kV line can be designed for about 1940
MVA.
CTU also mentioned that in the studies, line loading at 400 kV Jodhpur
(Surpura) (RVPN) – Kankroli S/c (twin moose) line was about 1250 MW in
Feb solar max scenario under worst case contingency. As the envisaged
power flow is less than 1940MVA, the reconductoring is proposed with HTLS
Conductor (Gap/Composite core) with 1400 Amps(~1940MVA).
4.2.2 Further, CTUIL proposed that on 400 kV Jodhpur (Surpura) – Kankroli line,
existing earth wire to be replaced with OPGW and associated FOTE need to
be replaced alongwith the reconductoring work of 400kV Jodhpur (Surpura) -
Kankroli line (tentative cost Rs. 9.4 Cr).
4.2.3 Further, it was opined that the scheme is an integral part of transmission
scheme for evacuation of power for various upcoming RE developers in
Western Rajasthan and required urgently. In view of that Bypassing of 400 kV
Kankroli - Bhinmal-Zerda lines at Bhinmal may be implemented in shorter time
i.e. 12 months and implementation time of reconductoring of 400kV Jodhpur
(Surpura) – Kankroli line may be kept as 18 months, however, best effort can
be made for reconductoring by 15 months due to urgent requirement.
Members agreed on the same.
4.2.4 As the estimated cost of the scheme lies between Rs 100 to 500 Crore and
works are of the nature of technical upgradation, NCT approved the scheme
for implementation through RTM mode.
S.No. Name of the scheme/est. Decision of NCT Purpose /Justification
cost
1. Scheme to relieve high Approved for To relieve overloading of
loading of WR-NR Inter implementation Bhinmal-Zerda line
Regional Corridor (400 kV through RTM under various operating
Bhinmal-Zerda line) mode- to be conditions.
given to
Est. Cost: Rs. 288.9 Crs POWERGRID
(includes Rs 9.4 Crs for (as the
OPGW and associated transmission
FOTE) lines/bays are
owned by
Implementation timeframe: POWERGRID)
12 months for bypassing at
Bhinmal and 18 months for
reconductoring works* from
date of allocation.
*Best effort to be made for
reconductoring in 15
months.
4.3.1 CTUIL stated that as per inputs from Odisha, large number of industries are
expected in and around Joda area with cumulative demand of about 480 MW
which cannot be catered with the existing 220 kV network in the area.
Accordingly, OPTCL will be implementing 400/220 kV Joda new substation
under intra-state scheme through LILO of existing Rourkela (POWERGRID) –
Talcher (NTPC) 400kV D/c ISTS line at Joda New S/s. With the integration of
Joda New 400/220 kV substation with ISTS, most of the power flows to Joda
New through Jharsuguda – Rourkela – Joda New 400 kV corridor. Further,
Rourkela substation also acts as a source of power to Jharkhand through
Rourkela – Chaibasa and Rourkela – Ranchi 400kV D/c lines. Accordingly, it
has been agreed in the 7th CMETS-ER meeting held on 31.05.2022 to
reconductor Jharsuguda – Rourkela 400 kV 2xD/c lines with HTLS conductor
in similar timeframe of establishment of Joda New 400/220kV substation i.e.
in 36 months.
Further, Circuit I & III of Rourkela-Jharsuguda 400kV D/c line are designed for
75°C max. conductor temperature and Circuit II & IV are designed for 85°C
max. conductor temperature with ampacity of 1228 Amperes & 1400 Amperes
(per conductor) respectively. However, to have equitable rating for all circuits,
it was proposed in the meeting that all four circuits of Rourkela-Jharsuguda
may be reconductored with HTLS conductor of 1228 A rating
4.3.2 Dr. R. Saha, Expert Member, stated that different ampacity values at the
same voltage level have been mentioned in the agenda items pertaining to
reconductoring, which needs to be standardized. He also suggested that the
details about the ambient temperature in case of reconductoring works needs
to be clearly mentioned in the agenda item.
4.3.3 CTUIL clarified that in this particular instance, ampacity of 1228A with ambient
temperature of 75°C have been considered as these lines have to be
reconductored on the existing towers. In the new towers, ampacity of 1400A
with ambient temperature of 85°C can be achieved. However, to avoid
differential loading of the circuits, 1228A ampacity with ambient temperature
of 75°C had been considered.
4.3.4 As the estimated cost of the scheme lies between Rs 100 to 500 Crore, and
works are of the nature of technical upgradation (clause 7.1(7) of Tariff Policy,
2016), accordingly NCT approved the scheme for implementation through
RTM mode.
S.No. Name of the scheme/est. Decision of NCT Purpose /Justification
cost
1. Eastern Region Expansion Approved for To provide power supply
Scheme-XXIX (ERES-XXIX) implementation to Joda and improve
through RTM power supply in
Est. Cost: Rs. 422.23 Crs mode- to be given adjoining areas of
to POWERGRID Odisha and Jharkhand.
Implementation timeframe: (as these
36 months from date of substations and
allocation. transmission lines
are owned by
POWERGRID)
4.4.3 CMD, POSOCO, stated that even after augmentation of ICTs at Kallam by
2x500 MVA, 400/22kV ICTs, Kallam substation will not fulfill ‘N-1’ criteria.
4.4.4 CTUIL stated that there is provision of space for only 02 nos. additional ICTs.
As such, additional augmentation is not proposed. He further stated that at
present Stage-II connectivity applications totaling around 1782.6 MW have
been received.
4.4.5 It was deliberated that as there is only wind generation, taking a peak factor of
0.75, generation of around 1340MW needs to be evacuated and hence the
system would remain ‘N-1’ compliant with 4x500 MVA ICTs. Nevertheless,
CTU may also take up with the TSP of Kallam PS for exploring space for 5 th
400/220 kV ICT at Kallam PS.
4.4.6 As the estimated cost of the scheme lies between Rs 100 to 500 Crore, and
works are of the nature of technical upgradation (clause 7.1(7) of Tariff Policy,
2016), NCT approved the scheme for implementation through RTM mode.
S.No. Name of the scheme/est. Decision of NCT Purpose /Justification
cost
1. Augmentation of Approved for Stage-II connectivity at
transformation capacity at implementation Kallam PS has already
Kallam PS by 2x500MVA, through RTM crossed 1 GW (~1782.6
400/220 kV ICTs (3rd & 4th) mode- to be MW). Hence, scheme for
along with 220 kV bays for given to augmentation of Kallam
RE interconnection consortium of PS was agreed to be
IndiGrid 1 Ltd. taken up considering the
Est. Cost: Rs. 156.89 Crs (Lead Member) 1 GW additional
and IndiGrid 2 potential under 181.5
Implementation timeframe: Ltd. (as the GW as well as rapid
18 months from date of substation is pace of Stage-II
allocation. owned by the connectivity applications
above being received by CTU.
consortium)
4.5 Transmission system for evacuation of power from Rajasthan REZ Ph-IV
(Part-1) (Bikaner Complex)
4.5.1 CTU stated that out of additional RE capacity of 181.5 GW planned by the
year 2030, 75 GW REZs lie in the state of Rajasthan comprising of 15 GW
Wind and 60 GW Solar potential. Accordingly, a comprehensive transmission
scheme was evolved for evacuation of 75 GW RE from Rajasthan, which
includes transmission scheme for about 8GW (Solar) in Bikaner complex
(14GW along with 6GW BESS), Bikaner-II: 4 GW (7GW Solar+ 3 GW BESS)
and Bikaner-III:4 GW (7GW Solar+ 3 GW BESS). Bikaner complex being out
of GIB area, more RE developers are interested in this complex.
CTU also stated that at Bikaner-II PS, St-II Connectivity for 5.575 GW RE has
already been granted against the potential of 1.9 GW (revised from 2.9 GW)
identified under Ph-II), therefore, evacuation for additional 3.7 GW capacity is
required from Bikaner-II PS. For additional solar potential of 7GW with 3GW
BESS at Bikaner-III, evacuation system (4 GW) shall also be required.
Therefore, total evacuation system requirement for 7.7GW (3.7 GW+4 GW)
shall be required from Bikaner Complex (Bikaner-II & III).
4.5.3 CEA stated that as per the Manual on Transmission Planning Criteria,
maximum transformation capacity at a substation at 765 kV level can be
9000MVA and 6x1500 MVA ICTs have been proposed, therefore, there is no
need to keep space for one number of additional 765/400 kV ICT.
4.5.4 Since the estimated cost of the scheme is very high (Rs. 13,460 Cr.), to make
the scheme competitive for bidders and considering ICT augmentation at later
stage, various packages were proposed. During deliberations, NCT opined
that the complete scope of the substation including the augmentation may be
clubbed as a single package. Accordingly, some packages proposed in the
agenda of NCT were combined. Package wise details are given below:
PART-A: (Rs. 4,741 Cr.)
Sl. No. Scope of Transmission Scheme Capacity /km
1 Establishment of 6x1500 MVA (along 765/400 kV 1500 MVA ICTs: 6
with one spare unit of 500 MVA), nos (19x500 MVA including one
765/400 kV & 5x500 MVA 400/220 kV spare unit)
Bikaner-III Pooling Station along with 765 kV ICT bays – 6 nos.
2x330 MVAr (765 kV) Bus Reactor 765 kV line bays- 2 nos.
(along with one spare unit of 110 MVAr) 330 MVAr Bus Reactor-2 nos.
& 2x125 MVAr (420 kV) Bus Reactor at (7x110 MVAr, including one
a suitable location near Bikaner spare unit)
765kV reactor bays- 2 nos.
Future provisions: Space for 400/220 kV, 500 MVA ICTs – 5
765 kV line bays along with nos
switchable line reactors – 6 nos. 400 kV ICT bays – 11 nos.
765kV Bus Reactor along with bay: 420 kV reactor bays - 2 nos.
1 no. 125 MVAr, 420 kV bus reactor -
400 kV line bays along with 2 nos.
switchable line reactor –4 nos. 400 kV line bays - 6 nos. (4 nos.
400 kV line bays–4 nos. for LILO of Bikaner-Bikaner-II
400/220kV ICT along with bays -5 D/c line & 2 nos. for Bikaner-II
nos. D/c line)
400 kV Bus Reactor along with bay: 220 kV ICT bays - 5 nos.
1 no. 220 kV line bays – 6 nos (for RE
400kV Sectionalization bay: 2 sets connectivity)
220 kV line bays for connectivity of 220 kV BC (2 no.) and 220 kV
RE Applications -8 nos. TBC (2 no.)
220kV Sectionalization bay: 2 sets 220 kV Sectionalisation bay: 1
STATCOM (2x±300MVAr) along set
with MSC (4x125 MVAr) & MSR
(2x125 MVAr)
2 LILO of both ckts of 400 kV Bikaner Length: 20 km
(PG)-Bikaner-II D/c line (Quad) at
Bikaner-III PS
3 Bikaner-II PS – Bikaner-III PS 400 kV Length: 30 km
D/c line (Quad)
4 2 no. of 400 kV line bays at Bikaner-II 400 kV line bays - 2 nos.
Sl. No. Scope of Transmission Scheme Capacity /km
5 Bikaner-III - Neemrana-II 765 kV D/c Length: 350 km
line along with 330 MVAr switchable
line reactor for each circuit at each end 765 kV, 330 MVAr switchable
line reactors at Bikaner-III PS –
2 nos.
765 kV, 330 MVAr Switchable
line reactors at Neemrana-II S/s
– 2 nos.
Switching equipment for 765kV
330 MVAr switchable line
reactors at Bikaner-III PS – 2
nos.
Switching equipment for 765kV
330 MVAr switchable line
reactors at Neemrana-II S/s – 2
nos.
6 2 no. of 765 kV line bays at Neemrana- 765kV line bays at Neemrana-II
II S/s S/s- 2 nos.
Note:
1) The line lengths mentioned above are approximate as the exact length shall
be obtained after the detailed survey
2) POWERGRID to provide space for 2 nos. of 400 kV line bays at Bikaner-II PS
3) Developer of Neemrana-II S/s to provide space for 2 nos. of 765 kV line bays
at Neemrana-II S/s for termination of Bikaner-III - Neemrana-II 765 kV D/c line
4) Provision of suitable sectionalization shall be kept at Bikaner-III PS at 400kV
& 220kV level to limit short circuit level
3 2 no. of 400 kV line bays at Kotputli 400 kV line bays at Kotputli - 2 nos.
4 LILO of both ckts of 400 kV Length: 85 km
Gurgaon (PG) - Sohna Road
(GPTL) D/c line (Quad) at
Neemrana-II S/s
Note:
1) The line lengths mentioned above are approximate as the exact length shall be
obtained after the detailed survey
2) Provision of suitable sectionalization shall be kept at Neemrana-II S/s at 400kV level
to limit short circuit level
3) POWERGRID to provide space for 2 nos. of 400 kV line bays at Kotputli S/s
4) The implementation of package shall be taken up matching with Package A
Note:
1. The line lengths mentioned above are approximate as the exact length shall be
obtained after the detailed survey
2. Developer of Bikaner-III PS & Neemrana-II S/s to provide space for 2 nos. of 765 kV
line bays alongwith space for Switchable line reactor each at Bikaner-III PS &
Neemrana-II S/s for termination of Bikaner-III - Neemrana-II 765 kV D/c line (2nd)
PART-D: (Rs. 3,271 Cr.)
Sl. No. Scope of Transmission Scheme Capacity /km
1 Neemrana-II- Bareilly (PG) 765 kV Length: 350 km
D/c line along with 330 MVAr
switchable line reactor for each 765 kV, 330 MVAr switchable line reactors
circuit at each end at Neermana-II S/s– 2 nos.
765 kV, 330 MVAr Switchable line
reactors at Bareilly (PG) – 2 nos.
Switching equipment for 765 kV 330 MVAr
switchable line reactors at Neermana-II
S/s – 2 nos.
Switching equipment for 765 kV 330 MVAr
switchable line reactors at Bareilly (PG)
S/s – 2 nos.
2 2 no. of 765 kV line bays each at 765 kV line bays - 4 nos (2 nos. each at
Neemrana-II & Bareilly (PG) S/s Neemrana-II & Bareilly (PG) S/s)
Note:
4.5.5 On the implementation time line of the projects, it was pointed out that due to
shutdown requirements of existing lines and considering the long lengths of
the 765 kV lines, the implementation timeframe to be kept as 24 months from
the date of SPV transfer.
4.5.6 After deliberations, NCT approved Part-E for implementation under RTM to
POWERGRID and recommended Part-A to Part-D for implementation under
TBCB.
S.No. Package Implementation time Mode of
implementation
1 Part-A TBCB
2 Part-B TBCB
24 months
3 Part-C TBCB
4 Part-D TBCB
5 Part-E Augmentation by 765/400 kV, RTM to
1x1500MVA ICT (4th) at Bikaner POWERGRID
(PG) - 18 months from date of
allocation.
5.1 Transmission system for evacuation of power from REZ in Rajasthan (20
GW) under Phase-III Part I
5.1.1 Member Secretary, NCT, stated that the scheme was discussed in 5 th NCT
meeting held on 25.08.2021 and 02.09.2021. In the meeting, the scheme was
deferred and NCT recommended the scheme to be reviewed in next NCT
meeting.
5.1.2 CTU stated that the Stage-II Connectivity and LTA for 2600MW has already
been granted at Ramgarh PS. Further, Adani Renewable Energy Park
Rajasthan Ltd. (AREPRL) are in process of developing 2GW Solar Park
proposed to be connected at Ramgarh PS and they have requested to
enhance the transmission system capacity of Ramgarh PS by minimum 5
GW. Implementation of HVDC shall help in evacuation of additional power
from Ramgarh PS.
5.1.3 CTUIL further stated that for Bhadla-II – Sikar-II 765 kV D/c line (Phase-II
Part- C) has been ratified by the GIB committee nominated by Hon’ble
Supreme Court, based on which CERC has accorded grant of transmission
license both for Part-C and its onward interconnector i.e. Sikar-II – Aligarh
765kV D/c line (Phase-II Part-D) which is out of GIB area. Since
implementation time frame of HVDC is more than gestation period of RE, it
was requested that the implementation of above HVDC scheme may be
approved.
5.1.4 Representative of CTU stated that the HVDC will be implemented with
overhead Dedicated Metallic Return (DMR) technology. He also stated that by
default, HVDC terminals can be operated for 50% of its capacity in reverse
mode (3000 MW in this case). For 100% reversal of power, i.e., from Fatehpur
to Bhadla, there may be some incremental cost. Further Bus sectionalizer
may be provided at 400 kV Bus between 2x1500 MW sections each at Bhadla
& Fatehpur to ensure reliability of 3000 MW power during contingencies at
HVDC terminals. For drawing Auxiliary supply for HVDC station at Bhadla
(HVDC), 400/33 kV transformers may be provided whereas at Fatehpur,
auxiliary supply may be drawn from 765/400/33 kV transformers. Members
agreed for above including provision for full reversal capability.
5.1.6 Expert Member, Shri R. Saha stated that presently, due to technological
enhancement in HVDC, upto 7500 MW can be transmitted through ± 800 kV
system. He suggested that this high capacity system may be considered
wherever required. In this regard, it was opined that for planning the future
transmission corridors, the suggested option would be considered depending
upon the quantum of power to be evacuated.
5.1.7 After deliberations, the scheme mentioned at para 5.1.5 was recommended to
MoP for implementation under TBCB route with following considerations:
(a) The implementation time will be 42 months from date of SPV transfer.
(b) The estimated cost of the scheme is Rs. 12,700 Cr (as per 5 th NCT
estimate).
(c) HVDC terminals will be implemented with 100% power reversal capability.
5.2.1 Member Secretary, NCT, stated that transmission system for evacuation of
power from additional 20 GW REZs envisaged in Rajasthan (Phase-III), was
discussed and agreed in 5th NCT meeting held on 25.08.2021 and
02.09.2021. As part of above scheme, Transmission system for evacuation of
power from REZ in Rajasthan (20 GW) under Phase-III Part I i.e. 6000MW
HVDC corridor towards Fatehpur for further dispersal of RE power from
Ramgarh PS/Bhadla-3 PS was also discussed. Augmentation of 1x1500MVA
ICT at 765/400 kV Kanpur (GIS) substation was also linked with HVDC
system (LILO of Varanasi-Kanpur at Fatehpur). The scope of the scheme is
as follows:
Augmentation by 1x1500 MVA ICT at 765/400kV Kanpur (GIS) substation
765/400kV 1500 MVA ICT: 1 no
765kV ICT bay – 1 no.
400 kV ICT bay – 1 no.
5.2.2 The above scheme would be required with the Transmission system for
evacuation of power from REZ in Rajasthan (20GW) under Phase-III Part I,
recommended at para 5.1 above, with implementation timeframe of 42 months
from date of SPV transfer. However, the augmentation of ICT work at Kanpur
(GIS) S/s will take about 18 months.
5.2.3 After deliberations, it was agreed that the scheme may be put on hold for time
being and would be reviewed by NCT after award of Bhadla III-Fatehpur
HVDC system or in case prior requirement arises as part of grid strengthening
5.3.1 Member Secretary, NCT, stated that this scheme comprising of establishment
of a new 400 kV substation at Gogamukh has been proposed by CTU for
feeding power to upper Assam above Brahamputra River. The proposed
substation is also planned to be utilised for providing additional feed and
strength to the under construction 132 kV Pasighat to Khupi corridor in
Arunachal Pradesh under comprehensive scheme through Gogamukh (ISTS)
– Gerukamukh (Arunachal Pradesh) 132kV D/c line.
5.3.2 He informed that the scheme was discussed in 8th Meeting of NCT, wherein
the proposal was deferred. Thereafter, the proposal was discussed in NERPC
forum on 11.07.2022 and agreed in special meeting held among CEA,
NERPC and CTU.
5.3.3 The scope of the scheme with estimated cost of Rs. 289 Cr is as follows:
i. Establishment of New Gogamukh 400/220/132kV substation
400/220 kV, 2x500 MVA ICTs alongwith associated ICT bays at both
levels
220/132 kV, 2x200 MVA ICTs alongwith associated ICT bays at both
levels
400 kV line bays
4 no. for termination of LILO of one D/c line (ckt-1 & ckt-2 of line-1) of
Lower Subansiri –Biswanath Chariali 400kV (Twin Lapwing) 2xD/c
lines
420 kV, 2x125 MVAr bus reactor along with associated bays
220 kV line bays
2 no. for termination of Bihpuria – Gogamukh 220kV D/c line (line to be
implemented by AEGCL)
132 kV line bays
2 no. for termination of LILO of one circuit of North Lakhimpur –
Dhemaji 132 kV new D/c line (LILO to be implemented by AEGCL)
2 no. for termination of Gogamukh (ISTS) – Gerukamukh (Arunachal
Pradesh) 132 kV D/c line
ii. Extension works at Gerukamukh (Arunachal Pradesh) 132kV S/s
2 no. of 132 kV line bays for termination of Gogamukh (ISTS) –
Gerukamukh (Arunachal Pradesh) 132kV D/c line
iii. Gogamukh (ISTS) – Gerukamukh (Arunachal Pradesh) 132kV D/c
(Zebra) line
iv. LILO of one D/c (ckt-1 & ckt-2 of line-1) of Lower Subansiri – Biswanath
Chariali 400kV (Twin Lapwing) 2xD/c lines at Gogamukh S/s
5.3.4 As the estimated cost of the scheme lies between Rs 100 to 500 Crore, NCT
approved the North Eastern Region Expansion Scheme-XVI (NERES-XVI)
scheme for implementation through TBCB mode with implementation time
frame as 30 months from transfer of SPV.
5.4.1 Representative of CTU stated that the Western Region Expansion Scheme-
XXV (WRES-XXV) involved augmentation of transformation capacity at
Raigarh (Kotra) by 1x1500MVA, 765/400kV ICT at Section-A (3rd ICT on
Section A) and by 2x1500MVA, 765/400kV ICTs at Section-B (3rd & 4th ICTs
on Section B) along with associated ICT bays as elaborated below:
Raigarh(Kotra) Section-A
765/400kV ICT: 1x1500MVA
765kV ICT bay: 1 no.
400kV ICT bay: 1 no.
Raigarh(Kotra) Section-B
765/400kV ICT: 2x1500MVA
765kV ICT bay: 2 nos.
400kV ICT bay: 2 nos.
5.4.2 He also stated that the above scheme was agreed in the 8 th NCT meeting
held on 25.03.2022 to facilitate ‘N-1’ compliancy of the 765/400 kV ICTs at
Raigarh (Kotra) S/s under following 2 conditions (after bus split arrangement):
5.4.4 It was further informed that subsequently, POWERGRID vide letter dated
19.05.2022 has intimated that as per site conditions, space for installation of
2nd 765/400kV ICT on Section-B is not feasible. Further, modification of bay
orientation may be required for installation of ICT on Section-A. The matter
was discussed with POWERGRID and it was decided that a committee
comprising of members from CTUIL & POWERGRID shall visit the site and
explore options to implement the scheme. The committee visited the site on
31.05.2022 & 01.06.2022 and submitted its site visit report and made the
following recommendations:
1st ICT in Section B: ICT to be installed in Space available for Future ICT.
For connection on 765 kV side, Future Bay No. 726 to be constructed in
existing Half Dia. For connection in 400kV side, 400kV DB Power 2 Line
(along with Line side equipment) to be shifted from existing 400kV Bay No.
433 to Future Bay 444 using additional BPIs. The vacated 400kV Bay no.
433 shall be used to terminate this ICT in AIS. This arrangement requires
sufficient outage of DB POWER 2 Line for shifting in new Dia.
1st ICT in Section A: ICT to be installed in Space available for Future ICT.
For connection on 765 kV side, the Dia consisting of Bays 710,711 & 712
to be constructed in AIS (Presently this space has been used to Terminate
the Champa-I Line in Bay 715).
765kV Champa-1 Line shall be shifted from Bay 715 to Bay 710. For
connection of ICT on 765kV side, Bay No. 712 shall be used. For
connection of ICT in 400kV side, Future Bay 421 shall be constructed in
existing Half Dia.
2nd ICT in Section B: ICT to be installed in Space available in the area
earmarked for Future ICT in Section A. For connection on 765kV side, 1
no. 765kV GIS Bay (consisting of 2 nos. CBs) shall be constructed
(Double Bus Double Breaker Scheme) in Bus Section-B in the space
available near 765 kV Bus Sectionalizer Area and using GIB (Gas
Insulated Bus Duct). The ICT shall be physically located in the area of
Section A and connected to Bus in Section B.
Likewise, for connection on 400kV side also, 1 no 400kV GIS Bay
(consisting of 2 nos. CBs) shall be constructed (Double Bus Double
Breaker Scheme) in the space available near 400 kV Bus Sectionaliser
Area and using GIB (Gas Insulated Bus Duct). The ICT shall be physically
located in the area of Section A and connected to Bus in Section B.
5.4.5 To deliberate on DB Power line 2 shifting from existing 400kV Bay No. 433 to
Future Bay 444 using additional BPIs (proposed above), a meeting was held
amongst CEA, CTUIL, POSOCO, POWERGRID and DB Power on 20.07.22,
wherein DB power expressed their apprehensions in shifting of their bay and
subsequently DB Power vide e-mail dated 26.07.2022 informed that the
above shifting is not acceptable to them.
ICT-II (4th):
Due to space constraints / non- Sec-B: 4th ICT
availability of required clearances 400 kV ICT bay (GIS): 1
in Section-B, 1 no. 400 kV GIS no. consisting of 2
bay (consisting of 2 breakers) to breakers [with Double bus
be constructed (Double bus double breaker scheme
double breaker scheme) in space and the ICT (4th)
near 400kV bus sectionalizer (physically located in the
area and the ICT (physically space available near
located in the space available section-A) to be
near section-A) to be connected connected with the above
with the above bay through GIB bay through GIB Duct]
Duct
5.4.7 Regarding present status and cost implications, representative of CTU stated
that although the scheme was to be implemented by POWERGRID as per
CTU OM dated 11.05.2022 in time-frame of 15 months (i.e. Aug’23), the same
is undergoing changes as per the site visit held on 31.05.2022 & 01.06.2022
leading to time and cost escalation. Hence, POWERGRID has requested
approval for revised scheme with revised time-line of implementation.
Further, with above changes in the scope of work, the revised cost of the
scheme has been worked out as Rs. 381 Cr. (i.e. increment by Rs. 107 Cr.).
5.4.8 NCT approved the revised scope of work given in table above under WRES-
XXV scheme with implementation timeline as 12 months on best effort basis
from date of allocation of the scheme so that the modifications are completed
before the start of next winter season.
5.5.1 Transmission system for establishment of KPS2 & KPS3 was deliberated in
the 5th NCT meeting held on 25.08.2021 and 02.09.2021. Ministry of Power
vide Gazette notification 5032(E) published on 06.12.2021 has appointed
RECPDCL as BPC for implementation of the subject transmission schemes
through TBCB route.
5.5.2 While preparation of Bidding Documents for the Khavda Phase-II Schemes (8
no.) for evacuation of 5 GW from Khavda RE park, the need was felt to
prepare the layout of the pooling stations & outgoing lines from Khavda RE
park based on the holistic Transmission System planned for evacuation of
total 27.7 GW RE capacity from Khavda. This was mainly on account of
limited availability of land and line corridors (RoW) due to restrictions (No-go
zones) imposed by Local Military Authority (LMA).
5.5.3 While preparing the layout of the pooling stations KPS2 & KPS 3, keeping in
view the present as well as future requirements, the following changes in the
space requirement (for future expansion) at KPS2 was felt necessary:
a) 765 kV line bays (future): 10 nos. instead of 8 nos envisaged earlier.
b) 400 kV line bays (future): 12 nos. instead of 10 nos envisaged earlier.
c) Space for proposed 8000 MW HVDC System as well as BESS
5.5.4 Accordingly, in view of the above changes in space for future provisions at
KPS2, the changes in scope of KPS2 are given as under:
Establishment of Khavda Pooling Station-2 (KPS2) in Khavda RE Park:
S.No Scope of the Transmission Scope of the Transmission
Scheme (Original) Scheme (Revised)
1. Establishment of 765/400 kV, Establishment of 765/400 kV,
4x1500MVA, KPS2 (GIS) with 4x1500MVA, KPS2 (GIS) with
2x330 MVAR 765 kV bus reactor 2x330 MVAR 765 kV bus reactor
and 2x125 MVAR 400 kV bus and 2x125 MVAR 400 kV bus
reactor. reactor.
S.No Scope of the Transmission Scope of the Transmission
Scheme (Original) Scheme (Revised)
Adequate space for future Adequate space for future
expansion of 5x1500 MVA 765/400 expansion of 5x1500 MVA 765/400
kV ICT’s kV ICT’s
5.5.5 Chairperson, CEA, enquired about the present status of the original scheme
and the need to incorporate the space for future HVDC Converter station in
the scope of works of the present scheme.
5.5.6 CEA & CTU stated that on account of limited land availability for Khavda
Pooling Station 2, the layout of the KPS-2 S/s depicting the orientation of the
HVDC, 765 kV & 400 kV switchyards have to be furnished alongwith the
bidding documents. To avoid any space constraints in future, the tentative
alignment of the incoming 400 kV lines of the developers and outgoing 765
KV ISTS lines from KPS-2 has also to be clearly marked in the layout. For
optimum development of Khavda Pooling Station -2 (KPS-2) keeping in view
present as well as future requirements, it is necessary to incorporate the
space for future HVDC converter station in the scope of the scheme under
bidding.
5.5.7 Chairperson, CEA, stated that as the Transmission scheme for Establishment
of Khavda PS-2 has already been notified by MoP and any change in the
scope of works would require amendment in the Gazette Notification done by
MoP. Accordingly, the scope of works needs to be finalised in a prudent
manner, so as to avoid such cases in future.
5.5.8 After detailed deliberations, NCT approved the changes in the future provision
to be kept at Khavda Pooling Station-2, on account of urgency to complete the
bidding process for the “Transmission Scheme for Establishment of KPS-2”.
5.6.1 In view of the direction of MoP, for more space provisions in new ISTS
substations (for evacuation of power from potential RE Zones / for meeting
drawl requirements of STUs, etc), space provision at Chhatarpur PS, being
established under “Transmission system for evacuation of power from
Chhatarpur SEZ (1500MW)” (currently under bidding), was reviewed and
revised space provision is given below:
2. LILO of Satna – Bina 400kV (1st) LILO of Satna – Bina 400kV (1st)
D/c line at Chhatarpur PS D/c line at Chhatarpur PS
5.6.2 As it is not possible for NTPC to construct dedicated transmission line upto
the planned Chhatarpur PS on account of the transmission line passing
through Panna Tiger Reserve, it was informed that two separate pooling
stations are being planned for pooling of RE power of RUMS and NTPC.
Hence, additional future provisions at Chhatarpur PS may not be required.
5.6.3 CTUIL was directed to examine the requirement of future provisions in view of
the above and it was decided that the matter shall be deliberated again in the
next meeting.
5.13.2 Ministry of Power, vide Gazette notification dated 24.01.2020 had appointed
REC as the Bid Process Coordinator (BPC) for selection of Bidder as
Transmission Service Provider (TSP) to establish the subject transmission
scheme through Tariff Based Competitive Bidding (TBCB) process.
Subsequently, MoP vide gazette notification dated 19.07.2021 had modified
the scope of the subject transmission scheme after examining the
recommendations of the 4th NCT meeting and renotified the scope to be taken
up under Phase-I i.e. “Transmission system for evacuation of power from RE
projects in Rajgarh (1500 MW) SEZ in Madhya Pradesh under Phase-I.”
5.13.4 SECI vide letter dated 23.06.2022 had requested to initiate the development
of several Pooling Stations including Rajgarh Phase-II (1000 MW),
irrespective of the receipt of connectivity applications. Rajgarh Phase II
Scheme as per 4th NCT meeting is given below:
Sl. No. Scope of the Transmission Scheme Capacity/km.
1. Augmentation of 400/220 kV, 2x500 400/220 kV, 500 MVA ICT – 2
MVA ICT (4th & 5th) at Pachora PS 400 kV ICT bays – 2
(Rajgarh) 220 kV ICT bays – 2
400 kV line bays – 2
220 kV line bays – 4
(to be taken up as per
Connectivity/LTA
applications received)
2. Pachora – Shujalpur 400kV D/c line Length – 80 km
(Quad/HTLS) (with minimum capacity
of 2100MVA/ckt at nominal voltage)
3. 2 no. of 400 kV line bays at Shujalpur 400kV line bays – 2
for Pachora – Shujalpur 400kV D/c line
(Quad/HTLS) (with minimum capacity
of 2100MVA/ckt at nominal voltage)
Note:
(i) Powergrid to provide space for 2 no. of 400 kV line bays at Shujalpur for
termination of Rajgarh SEZ PP – Shujalpur 400 kV D/c line.
(ii) Phase-II scheme to be taken up only after grant of Connectivity/LTA
applications beyond 1500 MW at Pachora P.S.
(ii) The schedule of implementation of Phase-II of the scheme would be
matching with schedule of RE developers or 18 months from the date of
transfer of SPV whichever is later.
5.13.5 Earlier, the Phase-II of the scheme had been agreed to be taken up only after
grant of Connectivity beyond 1500 MW at Pachora PS. However, based on
request of SECI to expedite the Phase-II of the scheme irrespective of
connectivity applications, the matter needs to be deliberated.
5.13.7 It was informed that MPPTCL has requested to review the above scheme in
view of overloading of Shujalpur 400/220kV ICTs and downstream system.
5.13.8 After deliberations, it was decided that the scheme would be reviewed in the
next NCT meeting based on visibility of RE generation as well as outcome of
studies to be carried out in coordination with MPPTCL.
5.14.1 SECI vide the letter dated 23.06.2022 had requested to initiate the
development of Pooling Stations simultaneously at different locations
including Anantapur and Bidar for integration of RE. The transmission system
at Ananthpur and Bidar was to be implemented through TBCB route for which
bidding had been initiated but were subsequently put on hold because of
uncertainty in development of RE generation projects.
5.14.2 A meeting was held in CEA on 01.08.2022 in which it was agreed that 1000
MVA capacity each at Bidar and Ananthpur could be taken up in first phase
and further capacity would be taken up based on the visibility of RE
generators. In the meeting, CTUIL had informed that they have not received
any connectivity applications at Anantapur and Bidar.
5.14.3 In view of above, the following needed to be deliberated:
Taking up the transmission schemes without any connectivity applications
Phasing of the schemes i.e. (i) whether bidding for Phase I & phase II of
each scheme would be done simultaneously with time gap in CoD of the
phases or (ii) taking up bidding of Phase I & phase II of each scheme in
different time frames needs to be deliberated.
5.14.4 After deliberations, it was decided that the scheme would be reviewed in the
next NCT meeting based on visibility of RE generators.
6.1 CTU stated that some existing transmission lines have been agreed to be
LILOed under various transmission schemes. The OPGW on the LILO portion
is being implemented by the TSP implementing the LILO portion. However, the
main existing lines do not have OPGW and hence the communication of the
LILO stations to the respective RLDC cannot be established. Respective RPCs
have given their consent for the installation of OPWG.
6.2 The transmission lines which are to be provided with OPGW alongwith
necessary accessories and FOTE are mentioned as under.
Western Region
400kV Bachau (PG) – EPGL line (221 km) [to be LILOed at Kallam]
400kV Satna – Bina (1st) D/c line (276 km) [to be LILOed at Chatarpur]
400kV Kakrapar - Vapi D/c line (116 km) [to be LILOed at Vapi-II]
Northern Region
765kV S/c Jaipur (Phagi) (RVPNL) – Gwalior line (312 km) (Ckt-1 is
proposed) (to be LILOed at Dausa)
400kV D/c Agra – Jaipur (South) (PG) line (254 km) (to be LILOed at
Dausa)
6.3 After detailed deliberations, NCT approved the installation of OPGW (alonwith
necessary accessories and FOTE) on the above lines which are to be LILOed
under various transmission schemes, under RTM mode to owner of the lines
viz. POWERGRID, matching with the timeframe of the respective LILOs.
2.2 The transmission schemes approved by NCT under TBCB is given below:
Sl. No. Name of Transmission Impleme Implement Allocated Estimated Survey
Scheme ntation ation to Cost Agency
Mode timeframe (Rs. Crs)
1. North Eastern Region TBCB 30 months RECPDC 289 CTUIL
Expansion Scheme-XVI L
(NERES-XVI)
3. The broad scope of above ISTS scheme, approved by NCT for implementation
through TBCB route to be notified in Gazette of India is as given below:
Sl. Name of Scheme & Broad Scope Bid
No. Implementation Process
timeframe Coordinator
1. North Eastern Region i. Establishment of New Gogamukh RECPDCL
Expansion Scheme-XVI 400/220/132 kV substation
(NERES-XVI) ii. Extension works at Gerukamukh
Implementation (Arunachal Pradesh) 132 kV S/s
Timeframe: 30 iii. Gogamukh (ISTS) – Gerukamukh
months from transfer (Arunachal Pradesh) 132 kV D/c
of SPV (Zebra) line
iv. LILO of one D/c (ckt-1 & ckt-2 of
line-1) of Lower Subansiri –
Biswanath Chariali 400kV (Twin
Lapwing) 2xD/c lines at
Gogamukh S/s
v. Associated bays and reactors
(Detailed scope as approved by
9th NCT and subsequent
amendments thereof)
Raigarh(Kotra) Section-B
Original Scope Revised Scope
765/400kV ICT: 2x1500MVA 765/400kV ICTs (Sec-B: 3rd & 4th): 2x1500MVA
765kV ICT bay: 2 no. Sec-B: 3rd ICT
765kV ICT bay (AIS): 1 no.
Sec-B: 4th ICT
765kV ICT bay (GIS): 1 no. consisting of 2
breakers [with Double bus double breaker
scheme and the ICT (4th) (physically located in
the space available near section-A) to be
connected with the above bay through GIB Duct]
400kV ICT bay: 2 no. Sec-B: 3rd ICT
400kV ICT bay (AIS): 1 no. (ICT shall be
terminated into above bay using partly 400kV
GIB duct and balance by BPI arrangement)
6.2 ‘Transmission system for evacuation of power from REZ in Rajasthan (20 GW)
Phase –III’ were approved in the 5th NCT meeting. The same was notified by
MoP for implementation vide Gazette notification dated 06.12.2021. The
transmission schemes are presently under bidding. In regard to the following
schemes, some modifications are necessary on account of increase in actual
line length (after detailed survey) and incorporation of future provisions as
detailed below:
Sl. No. Scheme Scope As approved in Modification/
5th NCT Additional
provision
1. Transmission Fatehgarh-III PS -
400 kV, 50 MVAr 400 kV, 63 MVAr
system for Bhadla-III PS 400kV D/c
evacuation of line (Quad) Switchable line Switchable line
power from reactor – 4 nos. reactor – 4 nos.
REZ in
Switching Switching
Rajasthan
(20GW) under equipment for 400 equipment for 400
Phase-III Part kV 50 MVAR kV 63 MVAR
A3 switchable line switchable line
reactor – 4 nos. reactor – 4 nos.
2. Transmission Fatehgarh-II PS –
400 kV, 50 MVAr 400 kV, 63 MVAr
system for Bhadla-III PS 400kV D/c
evacuation of line (Quad) Switchable line Switchable line
power from reactor – 4 nos. reactor – 4 nos.
REZ in
Switching Switching
Rajasthan
(20GW) equipment for 400 equipment for 400
under Phase-III kV 50 MVAR kV 63 MVAR
Part B1 switchable line switchable line
reactor – 4 nos. reactor – 4 nos.
3. Transmission Establishment of -- Future provision to
system for 2x1500 MVA765/400kV be included:
evacuation of & 2x500 MVA 400/220 Space provision for
power from kV STATCOM (±
REZ in pooling station at 2x300MVAr, 4x125
Rajasthan Ramgarh along MVAr MSC, 2x125
(20GW) with2x240 MVAr MVAr MSR) at
under Phase-III (765kV) Bus Reactor & Ramgarh S/s
Part C1 2x125 MVAr (420kV)
Bus reactor
Annex-I
th
List of participants of the 9 meeting of NCT
CEA:
1. Sh. Ghanshyam Prasad, Chairperson, CEA & Chairman, NCT
2. Sh. Ajay Talegaonkar, Member (E&C)
3. Sh. Ravinder Gupta, Chief Engineer (PSPA-II)
4. Sh. Ishan Sharan, Chief Engineer (PSPA-I)
5. Sh. B.S. Bairwa, Director (PSPA-II)
6. Smt. Manjari Chaturvedi, Director (PSPA-I)
7. Sh. Subhro Paul, Director (F&CA)
8. Sh. J. Ganeswara Rao, Deputy Director (PSPA-I)
9. Ms. Priyam Shrivastava, Deputy Director (PSPA-I)
10. Sh. Suyash Ayush Verma, Deputy Director (PSPA-II)
11. Sh. Deepanshu Rastogi, Deputy Director (PSPA-II)
12. Sh. Manish Maurya, Assistant Director (PSPA-II)
MoP:
1. Sh. Goutam Ghosh, Director (Trans.)
MNRE:
1. Sh. Dilip Nigam, Adviser
NITI Aayog:
1. Sh. Manoj Kumar Upadhyay, Deputy Adviser
CTUIL:
1. Sh. Ashok Pal, Deputy COO
2. Sh. Jasbir Singh, CGM
3. Sh. P.S. Das, Sr.GM
4. Sh. Kashish Bhambhani, GM
5. Sh. Anil Kumar Meena, Sr. DGM
6. Sh. Sandeep Kumawat, CM
POSOCO:
1. Sh. S.R. Narasimhan, CMD
2. Sh. Surajit Banerjee, CGM
3. Sh. Vivek Pandey, GM
4. Sh. Priyam Jain, Manager
5. Sh. Prabhankar Porwal, Dy Manager
Expert Member:
1. Dr. R. Saha
***