Retraction

of Rizal
 Group 5

Group members
Fernandez ,
Jhon Sen Rose
D
Gonzaga ,
Group 6 Angelica I.
Kiamko , Alexis Gonzaga ,
Group 9 Jay A. Reyneth
Lapatis , Erika Javier , Gilbert
Rez M. Jr Q.
Sacuan ,
Arlegen Lariosa ,
Therese
Salvaña , Angelica A.
Nicky Y. Madura, Erika
Suello , Cindy M.
B.
What is retraction?
• is defined as formally taking back
something which was said or done.
• The act of taking back or
withdrawing (a statement, a plea, an
accusation, or a condition of a
contract); the withdrawing or taking
back of a renunciation.
Controversy behind the retraction of Rizal
• Dr. Jose Rizal died on December 30, 1896 by the
Spaniards. He has been recognized as the National
Hero of the Philippines because of his writings that
destroys the idea of colonialism and frees the minds
of the Filipinos. His books questioned the ideology
that blinds his fellow countrymen.

• It was revealed that hours before his death, he

allegedly signed a document that signifies his
retraction from his words and profess his faith as a
Catholic until he died.
Claims on his retraction
According to claims by the Catholic Church,
Dr. Jose Rizal wrote a retraction paper on
December 29, 1896, taking back all his words
and writings against the church and professing
his faith.

There have been claims that the document, as

compared to the original file which was
discovered by Fr. Manuel Garcia, an
archdiocesan archivist in 1935, was a forgery.
Claims on his retraction
These people include eleven eyewitnesses who were
present when Rizal wrote his retraction, signed a
Catholic prayer book, recited Catholic prayers, and
the multitude who saw him kiss the crucifix
before his execution. Fr. Marciano Guzman, a great
grand nephew of Rizal, cites that Rizal's 4
confessions were certified by 5 eyewitnesses, 10
qualified witnesses, 7 newspapers, and 12 historians
and writers including Aglipayan bishops, Masons
and anti-clericals
Original document of Rizal’s Retraction
I declare myself a catholic and in this
Religion in which I was born and educated I wish to
live and die.

I retract with all my heart whatever in my

words, writings, publications and conduct has been
contrary to my character as son of the Catholic
Church. I believe and I confess whatever she
teaches and I submit to whatever she demands. I
abominate Masonry, as the enemy which is of the
Church, and as a Society prohibited by the Church.
The Diocesan Prelate may, as the Superior
Ecclesiastical Authority, make public this
spontaneous manifestation of mine in order to
repair the scandal which my acts may have caused
and so that God and people may pardon me.

Manila 29 of December of 1896

Jose Rizal
 Possible reasons for his retraction
To save his
family and
town from
further
persecution. To give
Josephine
a legal
status as To secure
his wife. reforms
from the To help the
Spanish church cut
government away from
the disease
which
harmed
her.
 Points to consider about this controversy
The Retraction Document discovered in 1935 is
considered the chief witness to the reality of the
retraction
The testimony of the press at the time of the event,
of “eye-witnesses,” and other “qualified witnesses,”
i.e. those closely associated with the events such as
the head of the Jesuit order, the archbishop, etc.

The Retraction Document discovered in 1935 is

considered the chief witness to the reality of the
retraction

Acts of Piety performed by Rizal during his last

hours as testified to by “witnesses.”

His “Roman Catholic Marriage” to Josephine

Bracken as attested to by “witnesses.” There could
be no marriage without a retraction.
 The Jesuit Version
The Jesuits figured prominently during the last 24
hours of Rizal’s life because Manila Archbishop
Bernardino Nozaleda asked them to take care of
Rizal’s spiritual needs while the latter awaited the
hour of his death.

Fr. Pio Pi (the Superior of the Jesuits) declared

that he had accepted the task and the Jesuits he
sent to Rizal’s detention cell were Frs. Vicente
Balaguer, Jose Vilaclara, Estanislao March, Luis Visa,
Federico Faura, and Miguel Saderra.
 The Jesuit Version
Of all the Jesuits whom Fr. Pi
commissioned to deal with Rizal, it was Fr.
Vicente Balaguer who wrote extensively
about what happened in Rizal’s detention
cell the day before he was executed. His
version of the story is narrated in a letter
he sent to Fr. Pi in 1908 and in an adavit
he executed in Murcia, Spain, on August 8,
1917.
Testimony of Fr. Vicente Balaguer
• In his sworn affidavit he wrote:
“Of all that has been narrated, I am
positive by personal knowledge. I have
personally intervened and witnessed it
myself; and I subscribed and confirmed it
with an oath. And lest, perhaps, someone
may think that I could not remember it
with so many details, after twenty years.
I testify that on the very day of Rizal’s
death, I wrote a very detailed account of
everything. The original of this account I
have preserved, and from it I have taken
all the data of the present narration. ”
 . ’
• According to Fr. Balaguer, he and Fr. Vilaclara arrived in Rizal’s
prison cell around 10 o’clock in the morning. He mentioned in his
letter and adavit that their encounter with Rizal started with a
discussion of some articles of Catholic faith.
• Fr. Balaguer mentioned that Rizal softened a bit when he warned him
that his soul would go to hell if he did not return to the Catholic
fold.
• The two Jesuits left Rizal’s prison around lunchtime, with Rizal still
undecided over whether to sign the retraction letter or not.
• Frs. Balaguer and Vilaclara returned to Rizal around 3 o’clock in the
afternoon and tried until sunset to persuade him to recant. They were
still not able to convince him to sign the retraction document.
• Their third meeting with Rizal took place at 10 o’clock that night, and
it was during this meeting that they showed Rizal the two retraction
templates Fr. Pi had given them.
• After making other minor changes to the draft, Rizal signed his
retraction letter before midnight. Fr. Balaguer handed it over to Fr.
Pi, who in turn submitted it to Archbishop Bernardino Nozaleda.
Challenges to the Jesuit’s version

“
Friedrich

him that
Stahl

people
wrote

did
to

not
Ferdinand
Blumentritt in January 1897, informing
take the
retraction account seriously.

In the December 29, 1908 issue

“
of El Renacimiento, Manuel Artigas
y Cuerva considered the retraction
document as “apocryphal.”
 Challenges to the Jesuit’s version

“
Jose Alejandrino sent to Filipino
expatriates in Hong Kong dated March 6,
1897, He wrote, “the Spaniards want to
“
Trinidad, Rizal’s sister, also attested that
after her brother’s death the Jesuits
invited their family to attend a Mass
offered for the eternal repose of his soul.
persecute him even in the tomb, since
The Jesuits promised that after the Mass
they slander him by imputing to him
they would show them the original
confessions and retractions which he
retraction. Until they parted ways, the
himself could not have done”
promise did not materialize.
From 1908 onward, Filipino Masons conducted a
sustained campaign against the claim that Rizal
had retracted. Every time they celebrated Rizal
Day, they would come up with activities that
debunked and ridiculed the retraction story.
 Challenges to the Jesuit’s version
In the 1935 document cualidad is spelled with a “u,”
while in Fr. Balaguer’s version the spelling
is calidad (without the “u”). Second, Fr. Balaguer’s
version does not have the word Catolica after the
word Iglesia. In the 1935 and the newspaper versions,
the word Catolica is present. Third, in the Jesuits’
copy the third Iglesias is preceded by the
word misma. This word cannot be found in the 1935
document. Fourth, with regard to paragraphing, Fr.
Balaguer’s version does not begin the second
paragraph until the fifth sentence while the 1935
version starts the second paragraph immediately
after the second sentence. Finally, the text of the
1935 retraction has 4 commas, while the text of Fr.
Balaguer’s has 11.
 Challenges to the Jesuit’s version
Dr. Ricardo R.
Pascual, one of the
persons who was given
permission by the
Rafael Palma, former archbishop to examine
president of the the document, wrote:
University of the “it is better that such
Philippines and a document should not
prominent Mason, have been discovered
disputed the veracity at all” (Pascual 1959,
of the document 4). Pascual scrutinized
because it did not the document
reflect Rizal’s true thoroughly and came
character and up with a book that
beliefs. He regarded questioned its
the resurrected authenticity.
retraction story as a
“piousfraud” (Nidoy
2013).
 The Cuerpo de Vigilancia Version
• What is the Cuerpo de Vigilancia?
The Cuerpo de Vigilancia de Manila
(Security Corps of Manila) was the
intelligence service that the Spanish
colonial government created in 1895. It was
organized primarily to gather information
on the activities of Katipunan members and
supporters.
Testimony of Frederico Moreno

In the Cuerpo de Vigilancia

collection lies the document
writted by Frederico Moreno. It
was the report of the agent
assigned to guard the prison
cell of Rizal during the day of
his death.
Frederico Moreno’s report
At 7:50 yesterday morning, Rizal entered death
row accompanied by Sr. Andarde and Fr.
Vilaclara. Approximately at 9, he was asked by
Sr. Maure if he wanted anything and answered
he longed for a prayer book which was brought
by Fr. March.
Sr. Andrade left the cell and Rizal was left with
Fr. March and Vilaclara. They discussed about
the retraction and some religious matters. They
left at 12:30 and Rizal was left alone to write by
himself.
At 3 in the afternoon, Father March entered the chapel
and Rizal handed him what he had written.
Immediately the chief of the firing squad, Señor [Juan]
del Fresno and the Assistant of the Plaza, Señor Maure,
were informed. They entered death row and together
with Rizal signed the document that the accused had
written. It seems this was the retraction.
 Frederico Moreno’s report
From 3 to 5:30 in the afternoon, Rizal read his prayer book
several times, prayed kneeling before the altar and in the
company of Fathers Vilaclara and March, read the Acts of
Faith, Hope and Charity repeatedly as well as the Prayers for
the Departing Soul.
At 6 in the afternoon the following persons arrived and
entered the chapel; Teodora Alonzo, mother of Rizal, and his
sisters, Lucia, Maria, Olimpia, Josefa, Trinidad and Dolores.
At 5 this morning of the 30th, the lover of Rizal arrived at
the prison accompanied by his sister Pilar, both dressed in
mourning. Only the former entered the chapel, followed by a
military chaplain whose name I cannot ascertain. Donning his
formal clothes and aided by a soldier of the artillery, the
nuptials of Rizal and the woman who had been his lover were
performed at the point of death (in articulo mortis). After
embracing him she left, flooded with tears.
 Frederico Moreno’s report
Rizal heard mass and confessed to Father
March. Afterwards he heard another mass
where he received communion. At 7:30, a
European artilleryman handcuffed him and
he left for the place of execution
accompanied by various Jesuits, his
counsel and the Assistant of the Plaza.
Father March gave him a holy picture of
the Virgin that Rizal kissed repeatedly.
 Claims on Moreno’s statement
• Moreno’s report contains details that are not
consistent with Fr. Balaguer’s affidavit. The
most serious and obvious discrepancy is that
Moreno never mentioned Fr. Balaguer in his
report. He may have damaged the credibility
of Fr. Balanguer, but it did not refute the
claim that Rizal retracted.
• The latter part of Moreno’s report confirmed
a few other controversial events that
occurred before Rizal was executed.
Kopya ng 'De La Imitacion de Cristo' na may sulat ni Rizal

Courtesy Jeremy Barns

Ang paglalagay ng “krus” sa kanyang mga huling sulatin

Sa kanyang huling bilin sa pamilya na hindi na nila

natanggap hanggang noong 1953, ang sulat ay
nagging bahagi ng donasyon ng Spanish Foreign
Minister Alberto Martinez Artajo y Alvarez sa
pamahalaang Pilipinas. “Ilibing niyo ako sa lupa.
Lagyan ninyo ng panandang bato at Krus. Ang aking
pangalan, araw ng kapanganakan at ng kamatayan.
Wala nang iba. Kung pagkatapos ay nais
niyong bakuran ang aking puntod, maaari niyong
gawin.Wala nang anibersaryo. Mas mabuti kung sa
Paang Bundok. Kaawaan ninyo si Josephine”.
Ang paglalagay ng “krus” sa kanyang mga huling sulatin
Sa kanyang huling tula, binaggit din ni Rizal ang
panandang krus sa kanyang libingan ng dalawang
beses.

“…

”
• https://englishkyoto-seas.org/2019/12/vol-8-no-3-rene-escalante/
• https://www.scribd.com/doc/181351754/Rizal-Retraction-
Controversy-docx
• https://ustep.ustp.edu.ph/pluginfile.php/145708/mod_resource/cont
ent/1/Retraction%20of%20Rizal%20-Chua.pdf