Growing: Opportunities
Growing: Opportunities
OPPORTUNITIES
ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2018
INTRODUCTION
$52.1m
• Progress: Substantial progress in Strategic Report
transitioning to a pure SaaS-based Highlights 01
model, providing a solid platform for At a glance 02
Revenue from core app future growth. Chairman’s statement 04
distribution segment
219%
Market overview 06
Chief Executive Officer’s review 08
+8%
Growth in subscriptions Growth strategy 11
$10.4m
Our user acquisition model 12
• Growth: Launched CyberGhost 7.0
Strategy in action 14
app and developed add-ons for
Financial review 16
Chrome and Firefox browsers.
Adjusted EBITDA* Principal risks and uncertainties 20
$15.9m
Paying users Board of Directors 22
• Acquisition of Intego, a leading SaaS Corporate governance statement 24
cyber-security provider Mac and iOS Remuneration Committee report 28
Adjusted cash flow cybersecurity and malware Directors’ report 30
from operations excluding protection. Statement of Directors’ responsibilities 32
$40.4m
with a focus on the provision of virtual Consolidated statement of comprehensive
private network (“VPN”) solutions. income37
Consolidated statement of financial position38
Cash balance Consolidated statement of changes
and no debt in shareholders’ equity 39
Consolidated statement of cash flows 40
Underlying Adjusted EBITDA** ($ million) Notes to the consolidated
financial statements 41
12 Shareholder information and advisors 72
th
row
10 %G
271 10.4
8
($ million)
6
6.0
4
2 2.8
0
2016 2017 2018
* Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure and a company specific measure which excludes
other operating income and expenses which are considered to be one off and non-recurring
in nature.
** The Adjusted EBITDA attributable to the Web Apps and License division for 2017 was $2.2
million. This division was discontinued as of September 2017; as no such revenue was
recorded in 2018.
KAPE TECHNOLOGIES PLC
Annual Report and Accounts 2018
01
AT A GLANCE
Kape’s core
software products
Digital Privacy
• Consists of our two complementary digital
privacy solutions: CyberGhost and
recently acquired ZenMate
• Safeguards personal information when
browsing the internet through unsecured
networks
• Blocks malicious content and provides a
c. 400 9
fully encrypted internet
• CyberGhost is consistently rated a Top 3
VPN SaaS provider in Europe and the USA
OS Performance Optimisation
• Consists of Restoro & Reimage, our PC
and Mac repair product, and Driverfix, our
driver repair solution
• Restoro is a patented repair solution to fix
PCs and Macs remotely; removes malware
and repairs computer software
• Proprietary Driverfix solution scans
computers for outdated drivers across all
Windows operating systems on desktop
computers, tablets and mobile devices
830,000 160
• Developed subscription brands
Malware Protection
• Consists of Intego, our leading Mac and
iOS cybersecurity and malware protection
SaaS provider
• Focused on the provision of malware
protection, firewall, anti-spam, backup,
data protection
• Provide parental controls software for
Mac, a tool for keeping children safe
online
• NetBarrier provides a two-way firewall to
protect consumers from malicious apps
solutions are now well-positioned to Our ability to manage and implement highly
targeted customer acquisition methodologies
capitalise on this sizeable global enables our team to reach millions of customers
daily, effectively and has enabled management to
market opportunity both accelerate organic growth and enhance the
customer traction of the software solutions that
we have acquired.
Introduction
I am pleased to report 12 months of significant
Our product and R&D teams continue to work hard
further development for the Group, during which
to develop and improve our solutions, ensuring
Kape delivered another impressive operating profit
quality and ease of use as well as heightened
performance. Our senior management team has
customisation and performance.
worked tirelessly to both shape and grow the
business – successfully completing two
acquisitions, alongside product upgrades and
launches. This strong performance has only been
possible due to the commitment, hard work and
dedication of the entire ‘global’ Kape family and
has underpinned our transformation into a leading
74%
consumer security company.
Market overview
The shift that Kape has made into a leading privacy- Subscription
first consumer security company has been central to
retention rate
our commitment to create long-term shareholder
value, as the directors believe that the characteristics
of the global cybersecurity market support our
underlying growth aspirations for the business.
Alongside this, Kape prides itself on the strength Strategic Goals Progress Achieved
and talent of its people. We now operate from ten
locations in eight countries and are thriving as a
truly global business. We are also strong advocates Grow • 219% growth to
Kape’s user base across 830,000 subscriptions
of diversity within our workforce and closely monitor
existing products by • Grew our product portfolio
the gender ratio of employees within the Company,
leveraging proprietary expanding into the Malware
with the percentage of women growing from 25% to
technology and expertise. protection, consumer firewall
35% in 2018, which is an incredible achievement
as well as expanded on
given less than 20% of the global cybersecurity
privacy protection offering.
workforce are women. We firmly believe that part of
Kape’s long-term success is the global and diverse
nature of our workforce and we intend to continue
our efforts to promote this. We have accelerated Acquire • Acquisition of Intego
our training efforts across the Company and see Businesses that broaden provides Kape with a
personal development as an important strategic product offering and grow strong foothold in the
component of our future growth. user base. malware protection
market, grows user base
and expands R&D
capabilities.
Ongoing strategy • Acquisition of ZenMate, is
Given the successful execution of our organic
highly synergistic expands
and acquisitive growth strategy in the year,
Kape’s product range and
management remain fully committed to
grows our user base into
maintaining our current focus. We will therefore
new geographies.
continue to develop and grow our product base,
while evaluating selective acquisition targets,
which would further enhance our market presence.
Build-up • Increased SaaS-based
The board remains confident in delivering year-on- A fully SaaS-based revenues through our
year growth in 2019. business model, improving Privacy solutions, Malware
both visibility and quality protection and PC & Mac
of earnings. repair products.
DON ELGIE • Overall increased visibility
NON-EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN over revenues, with over
18 March 2019 $30 million expected to be
delivered from existing
user in future periods
The cybersecurity
• High internet penetration has increased
the number of cyber attacks, resulting in
heightened concerns around data privacy
market was worth
• VPN market is already worth $24 billion and
is expected to grow by 50% by 2022
$153 billion in 2018
• The Data Protection and Privacy subsector
was the fastest growing, in light of the
and is expected to
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
and countless large data breaches that
grow by 52%*
have occurred over the last few years
by 2022
• Frequ
Digital privacy enc
growing y of usage of
in tier 1
market
VPN
• Value
awareness is of p s
underp ersonal data
inning t is
trend o he grow
f c yb er ing
growing, supported targetin
• 75% o
g consu
crime
m e r s’ d
ata
f VPN u
by new regulations on a we
• VPN u
ekly ba
s e r s us
sis
e VPN
se is m
and a more niche te
widely
ch prod
used co
oving fr
om a
uct to a
Market drivers
219%
growth in
Adjusted operating cash flow ($’000) 5,721 8,141
subscriptions
Strong progress was made in the year against our also integrated Intego’s R&D, marketing and
core KPIs, with the increase in both paying users product teams into Kape, which further benefit
and subscriptions demonstrating the strength of from the economies of scale of the enlarged group.
our digital marketing expertise in driving user We also expect to release new malware protection
acquisition. Additionally, the increase in our products in the coming months.
retention rate to 74% is particularly pleasing, and
now compares favourably against the wider B2C In October 2018, Kape acquired ZenMate,
cybersecurity industry. Clearly, the most important a multi-platform security software business
improvement is in visibility of revenues, and we with a focus on the provision of privacy solutions,
expect to deliver $30 million revenue from existing for a total consideration of $5.6 million. ZenMate
users in future periods (Dec 2017: $8 million). This is a highly complementary solution to CyberGhost,
is a key metric for the Group, as it reflects our Kape’s existing VPN solution. This synergistic
customers’ satisfaction, in addition to providing infrastructure allows Kape to leverage the
quality, highly visible earnings for the Company products’ strengths and create an improved
moving forward. In 2018, the Company remained product for users worldwide coupled with
highly cash generative. As stated in our growth substantial cost savings. In addition, with
ambitions we enhanced the investment in growth, ZenMate’s highly regarded web firewall and its
primarily in user acquisition. Safesearch application, Kape is now able to
provide a broader software suite to protect our
Divestment of Media division customers’ digital lives. As part of its integration,
and re-brand Kape implemented an extensive restructuring of
During 2018, we completed our transition to solely ZenMate, which has been completed in less than
focus on the delivery of cybersecurity solutions two months, ahead of management’s expectations.
following the divestment of Kape’s Media division, As a result, in this short time we have been able
announced in July 2018, to Ecom Online Ltd. As to bring ZenMate to profitability. ZenMate is
consideration, Kape will receive a 50% share of anticipated to be EBITDA enhancing from Q1 2019.
EBITDA from the Media division for the next five
years following the sale. This divestment resulted Prior to being acquired, both businesses’
in an anticipated decrease in revenues for the year marketing activities were primarily organic,
and is aligned to the Company’s strategy to focus presenting a clear opportunity for the
on the development and growth of its owned implementation of Kape’s digital marketing
cybersecurity assets. In March 2018, we rebranded expertise to drive user acquisition and enhance
to Kape Technologies Group plc to better reflect profit margin. The benefits of this implementation
the ongoing activities of the business. are anticipated to begin to be realised in 2019.
3 Best VPN, January 2019; VPN Mentor 2019, Comparitech June 2018
4 Size of the virtual private network (VPN) market worldwide from 2016
to 2022 (in billion U.S. dollars), Statista 2019.
GROWTH STRATEGY
1 2 3
Target market Digital funnel optimisation Existing customers
Privacy
Malware Protection
Performance
1 3
Target Market Existing Customers
User acquisition Retention and Cross-Selling
Future growth
Business with the
acquired Kape Group
70
60
63k
50
Users (Thousands)
40
30 37k
20 24k
10
12k
10k
0 5k
Financial position
At 31 December 2018, the Company had cash of $40.4 million
(31 December 2017: $69.5 million), net assets of $73.0 million
$40.4m
(31 December 2017: $79.4 million) and was debt free. At
31 December 2018, trade receivables and contract assets
were $3.6 million (31 December 2017: $8.5 million) which
represented 13 days outstanding, (31 December 2017: 42 days). Cash at
The decrease in Trade receivables is mainly due to the sale of
the media division
31 December 2018
Right-of-Use Assets
Real estate
leases Vehicles Total
$’000 $’000 $’000
Lease liabilities
Real estate
leases Vehicles Total
$’000 $’000 $’000
MORAN LAUFER
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
18 March 2019
Large and established Large and established internet, Antivirus and • The Group actively monitors the
internet, Antivirus and technology companies such as Symantec developments of the large and
technology companies Corporation, Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”), AOL, established internet, Antivirus and
may be able to significantly Inc., Apple, eBay Inc., Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”), technology companies to identify any
impair the Group’s Google and Microsoft, may have the power to threats that may impair the Group’s
ability to operate. significantly change the very nature of the ability to operate.
app-distribution and internet display advertising
marketplace. These changes could materially
disadvantage the Group. For example, Amazon,
Apple, Facebook, Google and Microsoft have
substantial resources and control a significant
share of widely adopted industry platforms such as
web browsers, mobile operating systems and
advertising exchanges and networks. Changes to
their web browsers, mobile operating systems,
platforms, exchanges, networks or other products
or services could be significantly harmful to the
Group’s business. Such companies could also seek
to replicate all or parts of the Group’s business.
Failures in the Group’s IT In addition to the optimal performance of the • The Group outsources hosting
systems and infrastructure Kape Engine, the Group’s business relies on the services, holding minimal server
supporting its solution continued and uninterrupted performance of its infrastructure itself. This allows the
could significantly disrupt software and hardware infrastructures. Sustained Group to flex and grow its operations
its operations and cause or repeated system failures of its software and efficiently.
it to lose clients. hardware infrastructures, which interrupt its ability • Kape uses third party content
to deliver its software products and services or distribution network services in order
advertisements quickly and accurately, could to offload traffic served directly from
significantly reduce the attractiveness of its its own infrastructure and minimise
solution to advertiser clients and publishers, network latency.
reduce its revenue and affect its reputation.
The Group is a multinational As a multinational organisation, operating in • The Group uses advisers to review its
organisation faced with multiple jurisdictions such as the Isle of Man, tax position and ensure compliance
increasingly complex tax Cyprus, Israel, Romania, Germany, Untied States with local tax legislation.
issues in many jurisdictions, and the United Kingdom, the Group may be
and it could be obliged subject to taxation in several jurisdictions around
to pay additional taxes the world with increasingly complex tax laws, the
in various jurisdictions application of which can be uncertain. The amount
as a result of new taxes, of taxes it pays in these jurisdictions could increase
laws or interpretation, substantially as a result of changes in the
including sales taxes, applicable tax principles, including increased tax
which may negatively rates, new tax laws or revised interpretations of
affect its business.
existing tax laws and precedents, which could have
a material adverse effect on its liquidity and results
of operations.
A comprehensive budgeting process is completed once a 6. Ensure that between them the directors have
year and is reviewed and approved by the Board. Actual the necessary up-to-date experience, skills and
results are monitored on a weekly and monthly basis and
compared to the yearly budget. In addition, the Group
capabilities
The Board considers that all of the Non-Executive Directors
performs quarterly reforecasts for expected performance
are of sufficient competence and calibre to add strength and
over the remainder of the financial period. These cover
objectivity to its activities. The Directors’ biographies are set
profits, cash flows, capital expenditure and balance sheets.
out on pages 22 and 23. The Board considers that the
The Group maintains appropriate insurance cover in respect
combination of the complementary skills and experience of
of actions taken against the Directors because of their roles,
its Board members provides it with an appropriate balance of
as well as against material loss or claims against the Group.
sector, financial and public markets skills. The composition of
The insured amounts and type of cover are reviewed
the Board is reviewed regularly to ensure that it has the
periodically. The Board has ultimate responsibility for the
necessary breadth and depth of skills to support the ongoing
Group’s system of internal control and for reviewing its
development of the Group. The Chairman has a clear and
effectiveness. However, any such system of internal control
distinct responsibility for running the Board whilst the
can provide only reasonable, but not absolute, assurance
executive responsibility for running the Company’s business
against material misstatement or loss. The Board considers
was delegated to the Chief Executive Officer.
that the internal controls in place are appropriate for the size,
complexity and risk profile of the Group.
7. Evaluate board performance based on clear
5. Maintain the board as a well-functioning, and relevant objectives, seeking continuous
balanced team led by the chair improvement
The Board currently comprises three Non-Executive Board and Committee meetings are scheduled in advance for
Directors (one of whom also acts as Senior Independent each calendar year. Additional meetings are arranged as
Director) and two Executive Directors. The Directors’ necessary.
biographies are set out on pages 22 and 23. The Board is
satisfied that it has a suitable balance between The Chairman assesses the individual contributions of each
independence on the one hand, and knowledge of the member of the Board to ensure that:
Company on the other, to enable it to discharge its duties • their contribution is relevant and effective;
and responsibilities effectively. The Board considers, after • that they are committed;
careful review, the Non-Executive Directors to be • understand the business and its strategy;
independent of management and free of any relationship • where relevant, they have maintained their independence
which could materially interfere with the exercise of their
independent judgment. The Board is responsible for the 8. Promote a corporate culture that is based on
overall strategy and direction of the Group. It provides robust ethical values and behaviours
leadership of the Company within a framework of effective The Board seeks to maintain the highest standards of
controls which enables risk to be assessed and managed. integrity and probity in the conduct of the Group’s
The Board, in setting the Company’s aims, ensures that the operations. These values are enshrined in written policies
necessary financial and human resources are in place to and working practices adopted by all employees in the
meet its objectives. It regularly reviews management Group. We strive to create an agile, creative and openminded
performance on a yearly basis and upholds the Company’s culture to support our success in a constantly evolving
values and standards so that its obligations to shareholders market where time to market and outside of the box thinking
and others are understood and met. The Board is supplied is essential for success. We promote cross company
with information in a timely manner to enable it to discharge discussions as well as encourage involvement of employees
its duties. The Board also reviews arrangements under which in proposing new and innovative project initiatives we do that
employees can raise concerns in confidence about possible through cross company activities as well as regular subject
improprieties in matters of financial reporting or other areas. based meetings.
The Board meets at regular scheduled intervals ten times a
year and follows a formal agenda. It also meets as and when The board believes that diversity is a key to future success
required. During 2018, all the directors attended all the board of our business we have put an effort on monitoring and
meetings. No one individual has unfettered powers of improving the gender ratio in the company, and we are
decision. The Directors may take independent professional pleased to report that the percentage of women in the
advice at the Group’s expense. The Non-Executive Directors company has gone up from 25% to 35% in the last year, as we
normally do not have any day-to-day involvement in the firmly believe that part of the company success is the global
running of the business but are responsible for scrutinising and diverse nature of our workforce and we intend to
the performance of management in meeting agreed goals continue our effort to promote diversity.
and objectives and monitoring the reporting of performance.
All Board members are considered to be able to allocate
sufficient time to the Company to discharge their
9. Maintain governance structures and
responsibilities as Directors effectively with a minimum of processes that are fit for purpose and support
45 days a year dedicated to fulfil their roles. good decision-making by the board
Our corporate governance structures and processes are
summarised and discussed under the heading Corporate
Governance on pages 24 to 26.
Auditor independence
The Audit Committee monitors the independence of the
Group’s external auditor. During the year BDO LLP provided
the Group with the following non-audit services:
Nominations committee
The Nominations Committee is comprised of Don Elgie (Chair
of the Committee), Martin Blair and David Cotterell, all of
whom are independent Non-Executive Directors. The
Committee meets when appropriate and considers the
composition of the Board, retirements and appointments of
additional and replacement directors and makes appropriate
recommendations to the Board. The objective of the
Committee is to review the composition of the Board and to
plan for its progressive refreshing, with regard to balance
and structure. The Committee is responsible for:
The Remuneration Committee (for the purpose of the Remuneration Committee report “the Committee”) is comprised of
David Cotterell (Chair of the Committee), Don Elgie and Martin Blair all of whom are Non-Executive Directors.
The Directors (other than alternate Directors) shall be entitled to receive by way of fees for their services as Directors (in
addition to fees paid for employment or executive services) such sum as the Board may from time to time determine,
provided that such amount shall not exceed in aggregate £500,000 per annum or such greater sum as the Company in
general meeting shall from time to time determine by ordinary resolution. Any fees payable shall be distinct from any salary,
remuneration or other amounts payable to a Director.
Each Director is entitled to be repaid all reasonable travelling, hotel and other expenses properly incurred by him in or about
the performance of his duties as a Director, including any expenses incurred in attending meetings of the Board or any
committee of the Board or general meetings or separate meetings of the holders of any class of shares or of debentures of
the Company.
Directors emoluments
Directors’ emoluments for the 2018 financial year are set in Pounds Sterling. These are set out in the tables below along with
the US Dollar equivalent cost to the Company:
Base
Salary/Fees Benefits Pension Bonus Total
Name GBP£ GBP£ GBP£ GBP£ GBP£
The US Dollar equivalent cost to the Company has been calculated using an average USD/GBP rate of 1.33
Base Salary/
Fees Benefits Pension Bonus Total
Name $ $ $ $ $
The beneficial interests of the Directors who held office at 31 December 2018, together with that of persons connected with
the Directors, in the share capital of the Company were as follows:
(*) Vesting schedule: 25% one year from date of grant and then in 12 equal quarterly instalments thereafter.
(**) The Awards vest equally over the three year period from grant, subject to the achievement of certain performance metrics relating to the three
financial years of the Company commencing 1 January 2018, as set out below:
FY 2018 25% of total Company revenues $0.049 The adjusted G&A expenses 33.33%
FY 2019 40% of total Company revenues $0.065 as a proportion of the total 33.33%
revenue of the Company is
FY 2020 55% of total Company revenues $0.072 < 15% for each financial year 33.34%
Should the SaaS Revenue, Adjusted EPS or G&A expenses fail to meet these target levels in any of the financial years, the
proportion of the Award for that financial year will be lost and will not be capable of vesting for the Executives.
The Awards have been granted as Jointly Owned Equity Awards (“JOE Awards”). The Company will transfer 1,800,000 Ordinary
Shares out of treasury to Intertrust Employee Benefit Trustee Limited as trustee of the Kape Technologies plc Employee
Benefit Trust, to be held jointly with the Executives in order to satisfy the proposed JOE Awards. Under the terms of the
Awards, the Executives will benefit from the growth in value of their respective Award from the date of grant along with the
right to acquire the Trustee’s interest by way of a nil cost option in the event that the Awards vest.
Annual bonus
The bonuses for the Executive Directors for 2019 will be based on Adjusted EBIDTA and non-financial and strategic objectives.
The level of bonus payable by reference to the financial performance of the Company will be determined on a sliding scale
based on the Company’s budget for the forthcoming financial year.
Service contracts
Executive Directors
The service agreements of the Executive Directors are for an indefinite term and provide for formal notice of six months for
the Chief Executive Director and three months for the Chief Financial Officer to be served to terminate the agreement, either
by the Company or by the Director. In addition to their annual salaries, the Executive Directors are entitled to annual pension
contributions starting at 1 per cent. as well as other benefits commensurate with their positions including health related
benefits.
Non-executive Directors
Fees for Non-Executive Directors are set with reference to time commitment, the number of committees chaired and relevant
external market benchmarks.
The Non-Executive Directors each have specific letters of appointment, rather than service contracts. Non-Executive
directors are appointed for an initial term of three years and, under normal circumstances would be expected to serve for
additional three-year terms, up to a maximum of nine years, subject to satisfactory performance and re-election at the annual
general meeting as required.
DAVID COTTERELL
CHAIRMAN, REMUNERATION COMMITTEE
18 March 2019 KAPE TECHNOLOGIES PLC
Annual Report and Accounts 2018
29
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
The Directors present their annual report on the affairs Appointment of a Director
of the Group, together with the financial statements The Articles of Association require that any Director
and independent auditor’s report for the year ended appointed by the Board shall, unless appointed at such
31 December 2018. The Corporate Governance Statement meeting, hold office only until the dissolution of the Annual
set out on pages 14 to 16 forms part of this report. General Meeting of the Company next following such
appointment.
The Company’s full name is Kape Technologies plc, domiciled
in the Isle of Man with company number 011402V. Kape Directors’ responsibility statement
Technologies plc is a public listed company, listed on the AIM The statement of Directors’ responsibility is set out on
market of the London Stock Exchange (“AIM”). page 32.
Going concern
The Directors, having considered the Group’s resources
financially and the associated risks with doing business in the
current economic climate, believe the Group is capable of
successfully managing these risks. The Board has reviewed
the cash flow forecast and business plan as provided by
management which includes the rate of revenue growth,
margins and cost control. As such, the Directors are satisfied
that the Group has adequate resources to continue in
operational existence for the foreseeable future. Accordingly,
they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing
these financial statements.
DON ELGIE
NON-EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN
18 March 2019
Revenue recognition
The group has a number of revenue streams for which the We assessed whether the revenue recognition policies
accounting must be individually considered. Due to the adopted by the Group comply with relevant accounting
different nature of agreements entered into by the group, standards.
and the fact that revenue is recognised both at a point in
time and over a period of time, there is a key risk of We tested revenue through substantive procedures, including
material misstatement arising from both the recognition of confirmation of cash receipts through to bank statement over
revenue around the year end (cut-off) and the revenue all material revenue streams.
recognition policy itself, as detailed in note 2 to these
financial statements. We performed cut-off procedures including recalculations of
contract liabilities around the year-end in order to get comfort
In accordance with accounting standards, costs that are over subscription revenues, noting that both newly acquired
directly incremental to obtaining a contract are eligible to entities have subscription based revenue.
be recognised as an asset, provided the entity expects to
recover the costs. A material deferred contract cost asset We reviewed the capitalised customer acquisition costs
has been capitalised in respect of costs incurred to obtain against the accounting standard requirements to check the
and fulfil contracts. There is judgement surrounding costs costs met the criteria for recognition. The length of time over
meeting the capitalisation criteria and a risk that this which costs are amortised is based upon management’s
balance is overstated. estimate of average customer lifetime, which exceeds the
licence length. Discussions were held with management and
reviews of historic customer purchasing trends were
undertaken. A recalculation was also performed over the
amortisation charge recognised in the year.
Business combinations
See accounting policy in note 2, and the intangibles assets With input from our valuations team, we challenged the
note (note 9) and the business combinations note (note 20) assumptions underpinning the significant judgements and
on page 66 respectively. estimates used by management in the assessment of the fair
values of the assets and liabilities acquired and consideration
There are risks present as a result of management’s paid including; reviewing underlying cash flow projections and
requirement to make significant judgements in assessing comparing against post-year end, royalty rates, discount rates
the fair values of consideration and of the assets and applied and the long term growth rates.
liabilities acquired. Management have engaged external
valuations experts to undertake the purchase price Our testing focused on both material and more judgmental
allocation exercise required. fair value adjustments that were recorded. Particular
adjustments we tested were:
The two acquisitions resulted in the group holding, on
consolidation, goodwill and intangible assets of $19.96m Intangible assets – the directors obtained external valuations
and $7.43m respectively. for the acquired intangible assets. Utilising our own valuations
expertise, we evaluated the valuation methodologies used for
each type of asset and used these to check that the
methodology used by the directors was appropriate and
consistent with market practice. We also examined the
key assumptions used as inputs to the valuation models to
assess whether these were consistent with our understanding
of the businesses acquired, their historical performance and
the markets in which they operate. These assumptions
included revenue and profit forecasts, discount rates,
customer attrition rates, technology obsolescence rates and
royalty rates.
The new standard sets out the principles for the Our procedures included the following:
recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure
of leases. It requires lessees to bring all leases within the • Obtaining copies of lease agreements to assess the key
scope of IFRS 16 on balance sheet with an asset shown terms included and verify the inputs to the calculation.
for the right of use and a liability shown for the discounted
amount of future payments. • Checking that any practical expedients taken are in line with
those allowed by the standard.
There is a risk associated with the accounting in respect of
IFRS 16, as a result of the judgements and inputs required • Reviewing the financial statement disclosures against the
within the calculation including determining the incremental disclosure requirements of the standard.
borrowing rate, noting that the asset and corresponding
liability are material to the Group at year-end.
Our application of materiality This, together with the additional procedures performed at
We apply the concept of materiality both in planning and Group level over the acquisition accounting and consolidation
performing our audit, and in evaluating the effect of process gave us the evidence we needed for our opinion on
misstatements. We consider materiality to be the magnitude the financial statements as a whole.
by which misstatements, including omissions, could influence
the economic decisions of reasonable users that are taken on Classification of components
the basis of the financial statements. Importantly,
misstatements below these levels will not necessarily be Revenue
evaluated as immaterial as we also take into account of the
nature of identified misstatements, and the particular
circumstances of their occurrence, when evaluating their
effect on the financial statements as a whole.
The remaining components not subject to full scope audit Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are
have been reviewed for group reporting purposes, using considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they
analytic procedures to corroborate the conclusions reached could reasonably be expected to influence the economic
that there are no significant risks of material misstatement of decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial
the aggregated financial information of those components. statements.
2018 2017
Note $’000 $’000
2018 2017
Note $’000 $’000
Non-current assets
Intangible assets 9 36,265 12,350
Property, plant and equipment 10 713 815
Right-of-use assets 23 1,769 –
Non-current investments – 50
Contingent consideration 21 934 –
Deferred contract costs 3c 7,196 406
Deferred tax asset 8 728 97
47,605 13,718
Current assets
Software license inventory 52 65
Deferred contract costs 3c 5,216 1,386
Contingent consideration 21 323 –
Trade and other receivables 11 6,101 11,071
Cash and cash equivalents 12 40,405 69,502
52,097 82,024
Total assets 99,702 95,742
Equity
Share capital 15 15
Additional paid in capital 131,091 130,728
Foreign exchange differences on translation of foreign operations 859 852
Retained earnings (58,991) (53,200)
Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent 72,974 78,395
Non-controlling interests – 977
Total equity 72,974 79,372
Non-current liabilities
Contract liabilities 3b 2,165 892
Deferred tax liabilities 8 3,125 349
Long term lease liabilities 23 1,693 –
Deferred consideration 25 143 993
7,126 2,234
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables 13 11,131 10,094
Contract liabilities 3b 7,349 3,120
Short term lease liabilities 23 226 –
Deferred consideration 25 896 922
19,602 14,136
Total equity and liabilities 99,702 95,742
The financial statements were approved by the Board and authorised for issue on 18 March 2018.
Foreign
exchange Equity
differences attributable
Additional on translation to equity Non-
Share paid in of foreign Retained holders of controlling
capital capital operations earnings the parent interests Total
$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
2018 2017
Note $’000 $’000
NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2018
1 Basis of preparation
The financial information provided is for Kape Technologies Plc (“the Company”) and its subsidiary undertakings (together the
“Group”) in respect of the financial years ended 31 December 2018 and 2017. The company is incorporated in the Isle of Man.
The financial information has been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, International
Accounting Standards and interpretations (collectively IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
The preparation of financial statements in compliance with adopted IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting
estimates. It also requires Group management to exercise judgement in applying the Group’s accounting policies. The areas
where significant judgements and estimates have been made in preparing the financial statements and their effects are
disclosed in note 2.
Going concern
The Directors have, at the time of approving the financial statements, a reasonable expectation that the Company and the
Group have adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. They therefore continue to
adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the financial statements.
Details of the impact IFRS 16 have had is given in note 23. Other new and amended standards and Interpretations issued by
the IASB that will apply for the first time in the next annual financial statements are not expected to impact the Group as they
are either not relevant to the Group’s activities or require accounting which is consistent with the Group’s current accounting
policies.
The impairment provision on financial assets measured at amortised cost (such as trade and other receivables) has been
calculated in accordance with IFRS 9’s expected credit loss model, which differs from the incurred loss model previously
required by IAS 39. The Group has chosen not to restate comparatives on adoption of IFRS 9. The change to an expected
credit loss model as required under IFRS 9 has had an immaterial impact on the group.
As allowed by the transitional rules in IFRS 9, prior year financial statements have not been restated and, in any event, no
material changes in the numbers recognised were required. The adoption of IFRS 9 has though resulted in presentational
changes as described above.
On the date of initial application, 1 January 2018, the financial instruments of the group were as follows:
Measurement Category Carrying amount
Original (IAS 39) New (IFRS 9) Original New Difference
$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
Non-current liabilities
Deferred consideration FVTPL FVTPL 993 993 –
Current liabilities
Trade payables Amortised cost Amortised cost 2,469 2,469 –
Other payables and accrued expenses Amortised cost Amortised cost 5,939 5,939 –
Deferred consideration FVTPL FVTPL 922 922 –
The Group does not expect any other standards issued by the IASB, but not yet effective, to have a material impact on the
Group.
The financial statements of all the Group companies are prepared using uniform accounting policies. All transactions and
balances between Group companies have been eliminated on consolidation.
Contingent consideration that is classified as an asset or a liability is initially recognised at fair value and subsequently at fair
value thorough profit and loss in accordance with IFRS 9 as appropriate.
At the acquisition date, the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed are recognised at their fair value at the
acquisition date.
Goodwill is measured as the excess of the sum of the consideration transferred and the fair value of the acquirer’s previously
held equity interest in the acquiree (if any) over the net of the acquisition date amounts of the identifiable assets acquired and
the liabilities assumed.
Under merger accounting, the assets and liabilities of both entities are recorded at book value, not fair value (although
adjustments are made to achieve uniform accounting policies), intangible assets and contingent liabilities are recognised only
to the extent that they were recognised by the legal acquiree in accordance within applicable IFRS, no goodwill is recognised,
any expenses of the combination are written off immediately to the income statement and comparative amounts, if
applicable, are restated as if the combination had taken place at the beginning of the earliest accounting period presented.
The result is that the merged groups are treated as if they had been combined throughout the current and comparative
accounting periods.
Non-Controlling Interests
For business combinations, the Group initially recognises any non-controlling interest in the acquiree at the non-controlling
interest’s proportionate share of the acquiree’s net assets.
The total comprehensive income of non-wholly owned subsidiaries is attributed to owners of the parent and to the non-
controlling interests in proportion to their relative ownership interests.
Foreign currencies
(a) Presentational currency
Items included in the Group’s financial statements are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in
which each entity of the group operates (the “functional currency”). The financial statements are presented in United States
Dollars ($000).
(c) Consolidation
The functional currency of the Company, and the presentation currency for the consolidated financial statements is United
States Dollars. For the purpose of the consolidated financial statements, the assets and liabilities of the Group’s foreign
operations with a functional currency other than United States Dollars are translated into United States Dollars using
exchange rates prevailing on the reporting date. Income and expense items (including comparatives) are translated at the
exchange rates at the dates of the transactions. Exchange differences arising, if any, are recognised within other
comprehensive income.
Effective March 31, 2018, the functional currency of one of the Company’s subsidiaries, CyberGhost SRL, has changed to US
dollar (“USD” or “$”) from Romanian Lei (“Lei”). The change was following an assessment by company’s management that
found that the USD is the primary currency of the economic environment in which the subsidiary operates. The exchange rate
at that date was Lei 1= $0.2646.
Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign operation are treated as assets and liabilities of the
foreign operation and translated at the closing rate.
Associates
Where the Group has the power to participate in (but not control) the financial and operating policy decisions of another
entity, it is classified as an associate. Associates are initially recognised in the consolidated statement of financial position at
cost. Subsequently associates are accounted for using the equity method, where the Group’s share of post-acquisition profits
and losses and other comprehensive income is recognised in the consolidated statement of profit and loss and other
comprehensive income (except for losses in excess of the Group’s investment in the associate unless there is an obligation to
make good those losses).
Revenue recognition
Revenue is measured based on the consideration specified in a contract with customer and excludes amounts collected on
behalf of third parties. The company recognises revenue when it transfers control over a product or service to a customer.
• The CyberGhost, Zenmate, VirusBarrier and ContentBarriar products are SaaS products which contain one performance
obligation that is satisfied over time. Since the service is being provided evenly across the contract period, revenue is
recognised on a straight-line basis. All payments from customers are received upfront. Some of these contracts’ term are
greater than one year, mostly for 24 and 36 months. The Company determined that the upfront payments are for reasons
other than providing a financing benefit to the Company and thus there are no significant financing components in its
contracts. The following factors were considered in the analysis:
• The intent of the payment terms that require all payments in advance is to preserve the customers, and to make it
economically unlikely for them to stop using the Company’s services.
1. The company has no need for financing and it charges its customers with an upfront payment, since otherwise it would
incur high administration costs related to renewals and collection of payments.
2. An upfront payment of the entire consideration is in accordance with the typical payment terms in the industry.
• The Reimage PC and DriverAgent products contain three performance obligations: one-time repair, unlimited use of the
repair software for one year and technical support for one year. Revenue for performing the one-time repair obligation is
recognised at the time of the sale. For the unlimited use package, customers benefit from the use of the repair software
and technical support for one year, revenues are recognised in line with the pattern of usage of the products and technical
support, which is substantially within the first 30 days of the 12 months period.
• Revenue from the sale of Intego Mac Washing Machine, NetBarrier and Backup products is recognised at the time of the
sale as the customer is able to use the products independently without any additional resources of the company.
• The Company also offers its products for sale as a bundle. For software bundles, the company allocates revenue to each of
the performance obligations based on their relative standalone selling price. The stand- alone selling prices are determined
based on the prices charged to customers who acquire software packages individually.
In respect of the App distribution CGU, customers are provided with a 30-60 day refund period in which they can receive a full
refund. Historical experience and information post year end allows management to estimate the value of products that will be
returned which are not material to the group and a refund liability has therefore not been recognised.
The determination of whether revenue should be reported on a gross or net basis is based on an assessment of whether the
Company controls the specified services before the transfer to its customers. In determining this, the Company follows the
accounting guidance for principal-agent considerations. This determination involves judgment and is based on an evaluation
of the terms of each arrangement. The Company determined that it is the principal in these transactions and therefore
revenue is recognised on a gross basis since it is primarily responsible for fulfilling of the services. The Company also bears
inventory risk as it pays the majority of publishers according to cost per mille impressions (CPM( but charges the payment
from the customer according to cost per acquisition (CPA)/ cost per click (CPC)/DCPC/ or cost per install (CPI). Stated
differently, an impression can be purchased from a publisher with no corresponding sale to an advertiser if the final user does
not click on the advertisement delivered. Moreover, The Company has the discretion in establishing the prices.
In this case, the Company determined that it is acting as an agent and therefore revenue is recognised on a net basis. While
the Company is primarily responsible for the connectivity services, it does not bear inventory risk nor has discretion in
establishing the prices. The customer chooses the inventory to purchase on a real-time basis, the amount spent on the
campaign is determined by the customer through a real-time bidding process and the amount earned by the Company is
based on a fixed percentage.
In addition, the company recognised an asset for fulfilment costs that are considered directly attributable in fulfilling a
contract. The fulfilment costs comprised of processing fees paid to third party processing service providers. This asset is
amortised on a systematic basis over the contract period.
Assets recognised from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract are subject to impairment testing. An impairment loss should
be recognised in profit or loss to the extent that the carrying amount of an asset exceeds:
a. The remaining amount of consideration that the entity expects to receive in exchange for the goods or services to which
the asset relates, less
b. The costs that relate directly to providing those goods or services and that have not been recognised as expenses.
Intangible assets
Amortisation for all classes of intangible assets is included within amortisation and depreciation costs in the income
statement.
Where intangible assets are acquired as part of a business combination they are recorded initially at their fair value.
The useful economic life of IP, customer lists and trademarks is 3 to 11 years.
Internet domains are generally considered to have an indefinite useful economic life. They are purchased due to the
marketability of the related domain name, are not specific to a particular product, brand, market or service and therefore are
not expected to diminish in value or use as a function of time.
An intangible asset is derecognised on disposal, or when no future economic benefits are expected from use or disposal.
Gains or losses arising from derecognition of an intangible asset, measured as the difference between the net disposal
proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset, are recognised in profit or loss when the asset is derecognised.
Internally-generated intangible assets are amortised on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which is 2 to 3
years. Amortisation commences when the asset is available for use.
Where no internally-generated intangible asset can be recognised, development expenditure is charged to profit or loss in
the period in which it is incurred.
An intangible asset is derecognised on disposal, or when no future economic benefits are expected from use or disposal.
Gains or losses arising from derecognition of an intangible asset, measured as the difference between the net disposal
proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset are recognised in profit or loss when the asset is derecognised.
(c) Goodwill
Goodwill is initially recognised as an asset at cost and is subsequently measured at cost less any accumulated impairment
losses. The Group tests goodwill annually for impairment, or more frequently if there are indicators that goodwill might be
impaired.
Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line method so as to write off the cost of each asset to its residual value over its
estimated useful life. The annual depreciation rates used are as follows:
• Computer equipment: 2-3 years
• Furniture, fixtures and office equipment: 6 -15 years
• Leasehold improvements: 10 years or the term of the lease if shorter
• Cars: 4 years
The assets residual values and useful lives are reviewed and adjusted, if appropriate, at each reporting date.
Expenditure for repairs and maintenance of property, plant and equipment is charged to profit or loss in the year in which it is
incurred.
An item of property, plant and equipment is derecognised upon disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected
to arise from the continued use of the asset. Any gain or loss arising on the disposal or retirement of an item of property, plant
and equipment is determined as the difference between the sales proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and is
recognised in profit or loss.
Impairment of property, plant and equipment and internally generated intangible assets
Assets that have an indefinite useful life are not subject to depreciation or amortisation and are tested annually for
impairment. Assets that are subject to depreciation or amortisation are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognised for the amount
by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair
value less costs to sell and value in use. For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for
which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cash generating units).
The classification depends on the Group’s business model for managing the financial assets and the contractual terms of the
cash flows. For assets measured at fair value, gains and losses will either be recorded in profit or loss or OCI.
The Group’s financial assets are trade receivables, other receivables and cash and cash equivalents. These assets are held
within a business model whose objective is to collect contractual cash flows, and give rise on specified dates to cash flows
that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding. As such, they are classified as
measured at amortised cost.
(c) Measurement
At initial recognition, the Group measures a financial asset at its fair value plus, in the case of a financial asset not at fair value
through profit or loss (FVTPL), transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the financial asset.
Transaction costs of financial assets carried at FVTPL are expenses in profit or loss. Changes in the fair value of financial
assets at FVTPL are recognised in the statement of comprehensive.
Financially assets measured at amortised cost arise principally through the provision of services to customers (e.g. trade
receivables), but also incorporate other types of contractual monetary asset. They are initially recognised at fair value plus
transaction costs that are directly attributable to their acquisition or issue and are subsequently carried at amortised cost
using the effective interest rate method, less provision for impairment.
Trade receivables are amounts due from customers for goods sold or services performed in the ordinary course of business.
They are generally due for settlement within 365 days and therefore are all classified as current. Trade receivables are
recognised initially at the amount of consideration that is unconditional. The group holds the trade receivables with the
objective to collect the contractual cash flows and therefore measures them subsequently at amortised cost using the
effective interest method.
Due to the short-term nature of the current receivables, their carrying amount is considered to be the same as their fair value.
Other receivables consist of amounts generally arising from transactions outside the usual operating activities of the group.
Due to the short-term nature of the other current receivables, their carrying amount is considered to be the same as their fair
value.
(d) Impairment
The group applies the IFRS 9 simplified approach to measuring expected credit losses which uses a lifetime expected loss
allowance for all trade receivables.
Trade receivables are measured at initial recognition at fair value and are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the
effective interest rate method. Appropriate allowances for estimated irrecoverable amounts are recognised in profit or loss
when there is objective evidence that the asset is impaired. The allowance recognised is measured as the difference between
the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate
computed at initial recognition.
Financial liabilities
Trade payables and other short-term monetary liabilities are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently carried at
amortised cost using the effective interest method.
Current tax
Current tax liabilities and assets are measured at the amount expected to be paid to or recovered from the taxation
authorities, using the tax rates and laws that have been enacted, or substantively enacted, by the reporting date.
Deferred tax
Deferred tax is provided in full, using the liability method, on temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets
and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial statements.
Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which
the temporary differences can be utilised. Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period
when the liability is settled or the asset realised, based on tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the
period end date, and is not discounted.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against
current tax liabilities and when the deferred taxes relate to the same fiscal authority.
Operating leases
The implementation of IFRS 16 replaced the existing guidance in IAS 17 – “Leases” (hereafter – “IAS 17”). The standard sets
out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases, and has a material impact mainly
on the accounting treatment applied by the lessee in a lease transaction.
Until the 2018 financial year, leases were classified as either finance or operating leases. Payments made under operating
leases (net of any incentives received from the lessor) were charged to profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the period of
the lease.
IFRS 16 changes the existing guidance in IAS 17 and requires lessees to recognise a lease liability that reflects future lease
payments and a “right-of-use asset” in all lease contracts within scope, with no distinction between financing and capital
leases. IFRS 16 exempts lessees in short-term leases or the when underlying asset has a low value.
The Company has elected to apply the practical expedient not to recognise right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for leases
of low-value assets only. The lease payments associated with these leases is recognised as an expense on a straight-line
basis over the lease term.
IFRS 16 substantially carries forward the lessor accounting requirements in IAS 17. Accordingly, a lessor continues to classify
its leases as operating leases or finance leases, and to account for those two types of leases differently.
IFRS 16 also changes the definition of a “lease” and the manner of assessing whether a contract contains a lease. At inception
of a contract, the Company assesses whether a contract is, or contains, a lease based on whether the contract conveys the
right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.
The Company has elected to apply the practical expedient to account for each lease component and any non-lease
components as a single lease component.
The Company recognises a right-of-use asset and a lease liability at the lease commencement date.
The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of the following lease payments:
• Fixed payments
• Variable payments that are based on index or rate
• The exercise price of an extension or purchase option if reasonably certain to be exercised
• Payment of penalties for terminating the lease, if relevant
The lease payments are discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if that rate cannot be readily determined,
the Company’s incremental borrowing rate. The Company uses its incremental borrowing rate as the discount rate.
The right-of-use asset is initially measured based on the initial amount of the lease liability adjusted for any lease payments
made at or before the commencement date, plus any initial direct costs incurred and an estimate of costs to dismantle and
remove the underlying asset or to restore the underlying asset or the site on which it is located, less any lease incentives
received. The assets are depreciated to the earlier of the end of the useful life of the right-of-use asset or the lease term using
the straight-line method. The lease term includes periods covered by an option to extend if the Company is reasonably
certain to exercise that option. In addition, the right-of-use asset is periodically reduced by impairment losses, if any, and
adjusted for certain remeasurements of the lease liability.
The following policy was applied before the adoption of IFRS 16:
Leases where a significant portion of the risks and rewards of ownership are retained by the lessor are classified as operating
leases. Payments made under operating leases are charged to profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the period of the
lease.
Share-based payments
Kape operates equity-settled, share-based compensation plans, under which the entity receives services from employees as
consideration for Kape equity instruments (options). The fair value of the options and share awards is recognised as an
employee benefit expense. The total amount to be expensed over the vesting period is determined by reference to the fair
value of the options granted, excluding the impact of any non-market vesting conditions (for example, Recurring Revenue and
Earning Per Share targets). Non-market vesting conditions are included in assumptions about the number of options that are
expected to vest.
At each balance sheet date, the entity revises its estimates of the number of options that are expected to vest. It recognises
the impact of the revision of original estimates, if any, in the income statement, with a corresponding adjustment to equity.
The proceeds received net of any directly attributable transaction costs are credited to share capital (par value) and share
premium when the options are exercised.
Cancellation or settlement is accounted for as an acceleration of the vesting period, and therefore the amount that otherwise
would have been recognised for services received over the remainder of the vesting period is recognised immediately.
Repurchase of cancelled or settled share based compensation plan, is accounted for as a deduction from equity, except to
the extent that the payment exceeds the fair value of the equity instruments granted, measured at purchase date. Such
excess is accounted as expense.
Share capital
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. The difference between the fair value of the consideration received by the Group and
the nominal value of the share capital being issued is classified as additional paid in capital.
The following accounting policies cover areas that the Directors consider require estimates and assumptions which have a
significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amount of assets and liabilities within the next financial year:
The assessment is reviewed if a significant event or a significant change in circumstances occurs which affects this
assessment and that is within the control of the lessee.
The Group is monitoring changes which can affect the assessment during the period such as changes with the product,
renewals rate etc.
Revenues from sale of software tool and provision of virtual private network (“VPN”) solutions are generated from the App
distribution CGU, while revenues from advertising is generated mainly from the Web Apps and licenses CGU. The revenues
generated from the Media CGU are presented as discontinued operations.
3 Revenue continued
(b) Contract liabilities continued
Significant changes in relation to contract liabilities
The following table shows the significant changes in the current reporting period which relate to carried-forward contract
liabilities.
December December
31, 2018 31, 2017
(USD, in (USD, in
Significant changes in the contract liabilities balances during the period are as follows: thousands) thousands)
Management expects that 77.2% of the transaction price allocated to the unsatisfied contracts (which represent to contract
liabilities) as of 31 December 2018 will be recognised as revenue during the next annual reporting period ($7,349,000), 15.1%
and 4.5% ($1,432,000 and $433,000) and will be primarily recognised in the 2020 and 2021 financial years, respectively. The
remaining 3.2% ($300,000) will be primarily recognised on the following financial years.
In addition, the company recognised an asset for fulfilment costs that are considered directly attributable in fulfilling a
contract. The fulfilment costs comprised of processing fees paid to third party processing service providers. This asset is
amortised on a systematic basis over the initial contract period.
Significant changes in relation to assets recognised from costs to obtain and fulfil a contract
December December
31, 2018 31, 2017
(USD, in (USD, in
thousands) thousands)
Short term Asset recognised from marketing cost to obtain a contract 4,624 1,071
Long term Asset recognised from marketing cost to obtain a contract 7,066 315
Short term Asset recognised from fulfilment cost to fulfil a contract 592 315
Long term Asset recognised from fulfilment cost to fulfil a contract 130 91
4 Segmental information
Segments revenues and results
On 26 July 2018, the Group disposed the Media division which represented a separate reportable segment in the prior year
and this has been accounted for as a discontinued operation, as set-out in Note 21.
Based on the management reporting system, the group operates two reportable segments:
• App distribution – comprising the Group’s own software and SAAS products and distribution platform;
• Web Apps and License – comprising revenue generated from monetising web apps and licencing the associated
technology; and
Exceptional and non-recurring costs in 2018 comprised non-recurring staff costs of $0.5 million (2017: $0.3 million) mainly due
to payments made to option holders in parallel to the special dividend paid in June, $0.8 million (2017: $0.3 million) for
professional services for acquisitions and rebranding expenses and $0.1 of onerous cost related to lease contract (H1 2017:
Nil). The decrease in Employee share-based payment charge is due to the repurchase of the share-based option
consideration from the founder of CyberGhost, which completed on 20 November 2017.
App Web apps
distribution and license Total
2017 2017 2017
Year ended 31 December 2017 $’000 $’000 $’000
Exceptional and non-recurring costs in 2017 comprised $0.3 million of acquisition bonuses to employees, professional
services related to business combination of $0.3 million and a $0.2 million expense from repurchase of CyberGhost’s founder’s
share options on 20 November 2017.
(1) Adjusted EBITDA is a company specific measure which is calculated as operating loss before depreciation, amortisation, exceptional and non-recurring
costs, employee share-based payment charges and charge for repurchase of employees options which are considered to be one off and non-recurring in
nature as set out in note 5. The Directors believe that this provides a better understanding of the underlying trading performance of the business.
5 Operating profit
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA is calculated as follows:
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Auditor’s remuneration:
Audit 220 158
Taxation services 7 8
Amortisation of intangible assets 2,305 1,982
Depreciation 286 394
Amortisation of Right-to-use assets 1,209 –
Employee share-based payment charge (note 17) 1,490 3,479
Operating costs
Operating costs are further analysed as follows:
2018 2018 2017 2017
Adjusted Total Adjusted Total
$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
Adjusted operating costs exclude share based payment charges, exceptional and non-recurring costs, amortisation of
acquired intangible assets and impairment of intangible assets. See note 4.
6 Staff costs
Total staff costs comprise the following: 2018 2017
$’000 $’000
The remuneration of the key management personnel of the Group which comprises the Executive Directors and senior
management team, is set out below:
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Details of directors’ remuneration are set out in the Remuneration Committee report on pages 28 to 29.
Interest expense 93 –
Fair value movements on deferred consideration 219 411
Net foreign exchange and Other finance expenses 626 41
938 452
The interest expense relates to lease liabilities on real-estate and vehicles that were originally recognised at fair value.
8 Taxation
The parent company is domiciled, for tax purposes, in both the Isle of Man and the UK. The final tax charge shown below
arises partially from the difference in tax rates applied in the difference jurisdictions in which the subsidiaries’ jurisdictions.
The Group continues to recognise a deferred tax asset of $159,000 (2017: $97,000) in respect of tax losses accumulated in
previous years.
The total tax charge can be reconciled to the overall tax charge as follows:
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Profit from continuing operations before income tax expense 3,292 1,259
Loss from discontinuing operation before income tax expense (2,568) (4,153)
724 (2,894)
Tax at the applicable tax rate of 19% (2017: 19%) 137 (550)
Tax effect of
Differences in overseas rates 83 (421)
Expenses not deductible for tax purposes 835 1,253
Deferred tax not recognised on losses carried forward 81 122
Tax expense for previous years 94 63
Tax charge for the year 1,230 467
The group has maximum corporation tax losses carried forward at each period end as set out below:
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Details of the deferred tax asset recognised arising in respect of losses and timing differences is set out below:
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Details of the deferred tax liability recognised arising from timing differences is set out below:
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
In addition, the Group has an unrecognised deferred tax asset in respect of the following:
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Cost
At 1 January 2017 36,424 9,462 2,383 685 69 3,450 52,473
Additions – 90 – – 25 1,432 1,547
Acquisition through business combination 1,706 546 743 5,690 – 204 8,889
Foreign exchange differences 212 70 92 479 – 16 869
At 31 December 2017 38,342 10,168 3,218 6,854 94 5,102 63,778
Additions – 6 – – – 2,289 2,295
Acquisition through business combination 5,751 2,491 2,342 16,168 – – 26,752
Disposals (3,663) (2,035) (2,078) (2,524) – (768) (11,068)
Foreign exchange differences (81) 10 24 125 – (30) 48
At 31 December 2018 40,349 10,640 3,506 20,623 94 6,593 81,805
Accumulated amortisation
At 1 January 2017 (33,559) (7,968) (1,415) – – (2,418) (45,360)
Charge for the year (2,320) (1,595) (1,128) – – (1,003) (6,046)
Foreign exchange differences (12) (4) (5) – – (1) (22)
At 31 December 2017 (35,891) (9,567) (2,548) – – (3,422) (51,428)
Charge for the period (1,031) (241) (450) – – (895) (2,617)
Disposals 3,663 2,035 2,078 – – 719 8,495
Foreign exchange differences 15 (5) (4) – – 4 10
At 31 December 2018 (33,244) (7,778) (924) – – (3,594) (45,540)
On 16 October 2018, the Group acquired 100% of the share capital of ZenGuard GMBH trading as ZenMate (“ZenMate”), a
multi-platform security software business with a focus on the provision of virtual private network (“VPN”) solutions. ZenMate is
a digital privacy company, headquartered in Berlin, focused on encrypting and securing internet connections and protecting
individuals’ privacy and digital data, as set out in note 20.
On 24 July 2018, the Group acquired 100% of the share capital of Neutral Holdings Inc trading as Intego (“Intego”), a leading
Mac and IOS cybersecurity and malware protection SaaS business. Intego is focused on the provision of malware protection,
firewall, anti-spam, backup, data protection and parental controls software for Mac, as set out in note 20.
On 26 July 2018, the Group sold the media division to Ecom Online Ltd. This sale is in-line with the Company’s strategy to
develop and distribute its own cybersecurity products. The carrying value of the Intangible assets of the Media division on the
Group balance sheet as the date of the sale is $2.6 million of which the majority related to Goodwill, as set out in note 21.
On 14 March 2017, the Group acquired 100% of the share capital of CyberGhost S.A (“CyberGhost”), a leading cyber security
SaaS provider, with a focus on the provision of virtual private network (“VPN”) solutions. Prior to the acquisition date,
CyberGhost acquired Mobile Concepts GmbH, a software development company based in Germany, for an amount of €1.5
million.
Goodwill acquired in a business combination is allocated at acquisition to the cash generating units (CGUs), or group of units
that are expected to benefit from that business combination.
The Group tests goodwill annually for impairment, or more frequently if there are indications that goodwill might be impaired.
The recoverable amounts of the CGUs are determined from value in use calculations. Goodwill allocated to the App
Distribution CGU has a carry amount of $20,623,000 (2017: $4,330,000).
The key assumptions for the value in use calculations are those regarding the discount rates, growth rates and expected
changes to selling prices and direct costs during the period.
For the App Distribution CGU, the recoverable value has been determined from value in use calculations based on cash flow
projections for the next five years from the most recent budgets approved by management and extrapolated cash flows
beyond this period using an estimated growth rate of 1 per cent (2017: 1 per cent). This rate does not exceed the average
long-term growth rate for the relevant markets. The rate used to discount these forecast cash flows is 25 per cent (2017: 25
per cent).
The discount rate used in the valuation of the App Distribution CGU was 25 per cent. If the discount rate was increased by 1
percentage point the effect would have been nil. There is no reasonably possible change in assumption that would give rise to
an impairment.
Cost
At 1 January 2017 976 279 450 – 1,705
Additions 215 40 174 111 540
Disposals (67) (140) (350) – (557)
Acquisition through business combination 94 60 14 42 210
Foreign exchange differences 22 6 2 9 39
At 31 December 2017 1,240 245 290 162 1,937
Additions 99 43 37 – 179
Disposals (17) (57) (146) (17) (237)
Acquisition through business combination 35 47 – – 82
Foreign exchange differences (15) – 5 4 (6)
At 31 December 2018 1,342 278 186 149 1,955
Accumulated depreciation:
At 1 January 2016 (711) (88) (315) – (1,114)
Charge for the period (250) (29) (106) (14) (399)
Disposals 55 44 304 – 403
Foreign exchange differences (9) (1) – (2) (12)
At 31 December 2017 (915) (74) (117) (16) (1,122)
Charge for the period (196) (37) (10) (45) (288)
Disposals 12 22 126 15 175
Foreign exchange differences (5) (1) – (1) (7)
At 31 December 2018 (1,104) (90) (1) (47) (1,242)
Other receivables as of 31 December 2018 include VAT receivable balance of $736,000 (2017: $742,000).
The fair values of trade and other receivables due within one year approximate to their carrying amounts as presented above.
The exposure of the Group to credit risk and impairment losses in relation to trade and other receivables is set out in note 16
of the consolidated financial statements.
The carrying value of these assets represents a reasonable approximation to their fair value.
The Group’s management consider that the carrying value of trade and other payables approximates their fair value. The
Group has financial risk management policies in place to ensure that all payables are paid within the credit timeframe and no
interest has been charged by any suppliers as a result of late payment of invoices.
14 Shareholder’s equity
2018 2017
Number of Shares Number of Shares
During the year a total of 374,095 new ordinary shares of $0.0001 par value from treasury were sold for cash in relation to
share option schemes resulting in cash consideration of $363,000 (2017: $437,000).
During the year 1,800,000 shares were transferred out of treasury to an employee benefit trust as part of a jointly owned
equity shares award to members of the executive management.
During 2017 a total of 3,810,667 of share option of $0.0001 par value were repurchased by the Company for a total cash
consideration of $3,800,000.
As at 31 December 2018, the Company hold in the treasury total of 4,476,153 of ordinary shares of $0.0001 per value (2017:
6,650,248). During 2018, 374,095 of ordinary shares of $0.0001 par value were transferred out of treasury to satisfy the
exercise of options by the company employees (2017: 801,175).
Additional paid in capital Share premium (i.e. amount subscribed or share capital in
excess of nominal value)
Retained earnings Cumulative net gains and losses recognised in the
consolidated statement of comprehensive income
Foreign exchange Cumulative foreign exchange differences of translation of
foreign operations
In accordance with Isle of Man Company Law, all of the reserves with the exception of share capital are distributable.
15 Interests in associates
On 1 April 2017, the Company increased its holding in Clearvelvet Trading Limited (“Clearvelvet”) to 50.01% of the share capital
of Clearvelvet by acquiring an additional 33.34% of its issued share capital. In September 2015, the Group acquired 16.67% of
the share capital of Clearvelvet for a total consideration of $850,000, of which $350,000 paid in 2016 on completion of certain
milestones.
Although the Group held less than 20% of the equity shares of the voting power at shareholder meetings, until 1 April 2017,
the Group exercises significant influence by virtue of its contractual right to appoint one of four directors to the Board of
Directors of Clearvelvet and to veto certain significant trading and investment decisions.
On 26 July 2018, the company decreased its holding in Clearvelvet to 0% of the share capital of Clearvelvet as part of the sale
of the Media division, as set-out in note 21.
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Financial assets
The Group held the following financial assets:
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Financial liabilities
The Group held the following financial liabilities:
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Amortised cost
Trade payables 4,146 2,469
Other payables and accrued expenses 4,728 5,939
Lease liabilities (see note 23) 1,919 –
Deferred consideration (see note 25) 1,039 1,915
11,832 10,323
The Group’s Directors monitor and manage the financial risks relating to the operation of the Group. These risks include
market risk (including foreign currency risk and interest rate risk), credit risk and liquidity risk.
Market risk
(a) Foreign currency risk management
Currency risk is the risk that the value of financial instruments will fluctuate due to changes in foreign exchange rates.
Currency risk arises when future commercial transactions and recognised assets and liabilities are denominated in a currency
that is not the Group’s measurement currency. The Group is exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from various currency
exposures primarily with respect to the Israeli New Shekel, British Pound, Euro, Australian Dollar, Philippines peso and
Romanian Leu. The Group’s management monitors the exchange rate fluctuations on a continuous basis and acts accordingly
and also avoids engaging in a significant level of transactions in currencies which are considered volatile or exposed to risk of
significant fluctuations.
The carrying amounts of the Group’s foreign currency denominated monetary assets and monetary liabilities at the reporting
date are as follows:
Liabilities Assets
2018 2017 2018 2017
$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
At the reporting date the interest rate analysis of financial instruments was:
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Any increase/ (decrease) in interest rates will have no effect on results and equity of the Group, because, all financial
instruments are fixed rate.
Credit risk
Credit risk arises when a failure by counterparties to discharge their obligations could reduce the amount of future cash
inflows from financial assets on hand at the reporting date. The principle credit risk is considered to result from new
relationships with customers with which the Group does not have a long working relationship and for which reliable
information as to their credit ratings cannot be obtained. In such cases the Group limits the initial credit facility afforded to
these customers. Cash balances are held with high credit quality financial institutions and the Group has policies to limit the
amount of credit exposure to any financial institution or customer.
The carrying amount of financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure. The maximum exposure to credit risk at
the reporting date was:
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Credit risk arises when a failure by counterparties to discharge their obligations could reduce the amount of future cash
inflows from financial assets on hand at the balance sheet date.
Wherever possible and commercially practical the Group invests cash with major financial institutions that have a rating of at
least A- as defined by Standard & Poors. While the majority of money is held in line with the above policy, a small amount is
held at various institutions with no rating. The Group holds approximately 3.5% of its funds (2017: 2.9%) in financial institutions
below A- rate and 0.3% in payment methods with no rating (2017:4.4%).
Management expects that 39.5% of assets recognised to obtain a contract as of 31 December 2018 will be recognised as
expense during the next annual reporting period ($4,624,000), 33.1% and 22.8% ($3,867,000 and $2,663,000) and will be
primarily recognised in the 2020 and 2021 financial years, respectively. The remaining 4.6% ($536,000) will be primarily
recognised on the following financial years
Financial
Financial institutions
institutions below
with A- and A- rating and
Total above rating no rating
$’000 $’000 $’000
Before accepting a new customer, the Group assesses each potential customer’s credit quality and risk. Customer contracts
are drafted to reduce any potential credit risk to the Group. Where appropriate the customer’s recent financial statements are
reviewed.
The group applies the IFRS 9 simplified approach to measuring expected credit losses which uses a lifetime expected loss
allowance for all trade receivables. To measure the expected credit losses, trade receivables have been grouped based on
the days past due. The expected loss rates are based on the payment profiles of sales over a period of 90 days month before
31 December 2018 or 1 January 2018 respectively and the corresponding historical credit losses experienced within this period.
At 31 December the expected credit losses provision for trade receivables and contract assets is as follows:
Between 1 Between 31 More than
and 30 days and 30 days 60 days past
Current past due past due due
$’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
The ageing of trade receivables that are past due but not impaired is shown below:
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
The Group holds a specific loss provision of $17,000 at 31 December 2018 (2017: $239,000). The expected credit loss rate is
immaterial to the Group, given the nature of the Group’s activities operating within B2C markets. At 31 December 2018, the
Group had trade receivables of $112,000 (2017: $2,600,000) that were past due but not impaired.
Trade receivables are written off when there is no reasonable expectation of recovery. Indicators that there is no reasonable
expectation of recovery include, amongst others, the failure of a debtor to engage in a repayment plan with the group and any
change in the credit quality from the date the credit was initially granted up to the reporting date.
Impairment losses on trade receivables are presented as net impairment losses within operating profit. Subsequent
recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against the same line item.
In determining the recoverability of trade receivables, the Group considers any change in the credit quality of the trade
receivable from the date the credit was initially granted up to the reporting date. The Group does not hold any collateral as
security. Impairments of trade receivables are expensed as operating expenses.
The Group’s liquidity risk is monitored using regular cash flow reporting and projections to ensure that it is able to meet its
obligations as they fall due.
The following tables detail the Group’s remaining contractual maturity for its financial liabilities. The tables have been drawn
up based on the undiscounted cash flows of financial liabilities based on the earliest date on which the Group can be required
to pay. The table includes both interest and principal cash flows.
Carrying Contractual 3 months Between Between More than
amounts cash flows or less 3-12 months 1-5 years 5 years
2018 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000 $’000
Capital risk
The Group seeks to maintain a capital structure which enables it to continue as a going concern and which supports its
business strategy. The Group’s capital is provided by equity and manages its capital structure through cash flow from
operations. The Group invest available funds within short-term bank deposit which support the Group future available capital.
Vesting conditions
Groups 1-5 and 7-10 – 25% at the end of the first year following the grant date. 6.25% on a quarterly basis during 12 quarters
period thereafter.
Group 6 – 50% at the end of the second year following the grant date and the remainder at the end of the third year following
the grant.
Group 11 – 33.33% on a yearly basis during 3 years period following the grant date subject to certain performance conditions
The total number of shares exercisable as of 31 December 2018 was 5,864,311 (2017: 2,973,348).
The weighted average fair value of options granted in the year using the Cox, Ross and Rubinstein’s Binomial Model (the
“Binomial Model”) was $1.03. The inputs into the Binomial model are as follows:
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
We used the empirical observations for early exercise factor of public companies as an appropriate benchmark for the
expected early exercise factor.
Expected volatility was determined based on the historical volatility of comparable companies.
Forfeiture rate is assumed to be 0% for senior management and 28% for other employees.
The risk-free interest rate was estimated based on average yields of UK Government Bonds.
The Group recognised total share based payments relating to equity-settled share based payment transactions as follows:
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Movements in the number of share options outstanding and their related weighted average exercise prices are as follows:
2018 2017
Weighted average Weighted average
exercise price Number of options exercise price Number of options
The options outstanding at 31 December 2018 had a weighted average remaining contractual life of 7.9 years (2017: 8.2 years).
On 24 August 2018, the Company awarded 1,800,000 in respect of its ordinary shares of $0.0001 each have been granted
under the Company’s 2014 Global Equity Plan to members of its executive management. The Awards vest equally over the
three-year period from grant, subject to the achievement of certain performance metrics relating to the three financial years
of the Company commencing 1 January 2018. The Awards have been granted as Jointly Owned Equity Awards (“JOE Awards”).
Under the terms of the Awards, the Executives will benefit from the growth in value of their respective Award from the date of
grant along with the right to acquire the Trustee’s interest by way of a nil cost option in the event that the Awards vest.
Adjusted earnings per share is a non-GAAP measure and therefore the approach may differ between companies. Adjusted
earnings have been calculated as follows:
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
Number Number
Denominator – basic:
Weighted average number of equity shares for the purpose of earnings per share 142,008,376 141,547,496
Denominator – diluted
Weighted average number of equity shares for the purpose of diluted earnings
per share 147,955,573 145,260,658
The diluted denominator has not been used where this has anti-dilutive effect. Basic and diluted loss per share are therefore
the same for reporting purposes.
The difference between weighted average number of Ordinary shares used for basic earnings per share and the diluted
earnings per share is 5,947,198 (2017: 3,713,162) being the effect of all potentially dilutive Ordinary shares derived from the
number of share options granted to employees.
19 Subsidiaries
Name Country of incorporation Principal activities Holding %
BestAd Hi Tech Media Limited (**) Israel Development technical support and marketing 100
services
Crossrider Advanced Technologies Israel Development services and technical and marketing 100
Limited (**) support
Crossrider (Israel) Limited (**) Israel Provision of marketing services to related parties 100
Crossrider Technologies Limited Cyprus Licensing of IP software and agency services to 100
(formerly Market Connect (Cyprus) related parties
Limited)
Crossrider Sports Limited (**) United Kingdom Provision of consulting services 100
Reimage Limited Isle of Man Development and sale of the “Reimage” software tool. 100
Reimage Limited(**) Cyprus Consulting, market research and software 100
development services
R.S.F Remote Software Fixing Israel Provision of development, technical support and 100
Limited (**) marketing support services to its parent company
Crosspath Trading Limited British Virgin Islands Performance of commercial activity through the 100
licensing of technology from Crossrider technologies
Ltd
Blueroad Trading Limited Cyprus Provision of agency services to Crosspath Limited 100
Frontbase Trading Limited Cyprus Provision of agency services to Crosspath Limited 100
Crossrider ROM SRL(**) Romania Provision of marketing and development services 100
Definiti Media Ltd(**) Israel Providing digital advertising services for mobile 100
platforms
CyberGhost SRL(**) Romania leading cyber security SaaS provider, with a focus on 100
the provision of virtual private network (“VPN”)
solutions
Mobile Concept(**) Germany Provision of software development services to its 100
parent company
Neutral Holding Inc United Sates of Holding company of Intego inc, a leading cyber 100
America security SaaS provider, with a focus on the provision
of malware protection to Macintosh operating
systems.
Intego SA (**) France Development and technical support services. 100
Intego Inc (**) United Sates of A leading cyber security SaaS provider, with a focus 100
America on the provision of malware protection to Macintosh
operating systems
ZenGuard GMBH Germany A leading cyber security SaaS provider, with a focus 100
on the provision of malware protection to Macintosh
operating systems
Kape Technologies Employee Benefit Jersey Employee benefit trust 100
Trust
The Group has been formed from a series of common control transactions which have been accounted for using merger
accounting; and acquisitions from third parties which have been accounted for using the acquisition method.
The Acquisition is directly in-line with Kape’s core strategy to accelerate its growth in the cybersecurity market through select
acquisitions, and brings significant strategic benefits to the Company.
Details of the fair value of identifiable assets and liabilities acquired, purchase consideration and goodwill, are as follows:
Acquiree’s
carrying
amount
before
combination Fair value
$’000 $’000
Intego is being acquired for a total consideration of $16.0 million cash, from internal cash resources, to be satisfied on closing
of the Acquisition.
Since the acquisition date, Intego has contributed $2.9 million to group revenues, profit of $1.1 million to group loss. In
addition, since the acquisition date Intego contributed $2.6 million to segment results of the app distribution segment (as set
out in note 4). If the acquisition had occurred on 1 January 2018, group revenue would have been $55.5 million, group loss for
the period would have been $0.9 million and the app distribution segmental result would have been $28.2 million.
Acquisition costs of $0.6 million arose as a result of the transaction. These have been recognised as part of administrative
expenses in the statement of comprehensive income.
Details of the fair value of identifiable assets and liabilities acquired, purchase consideration and goodwill, are as follows:
Acquiree’s
carrying
amount
before
combination Fair value
$’000 $’000
ZenMate is being acquired from several venture capital funds and private investors, including the founders of the business, for
a total consideration of $5.6 million (€4.8 million) in cash, funded from Kape’s internal cash resources, to be satisfied on
closing of the Acquisition.
As part of the acquisition, Kape indicated a restructuring plan which was planned and designed by ZenMate former
management. The restructuring plan was intended to downsize ZenMate’s staff and reduce operational costs. The
restructuring plan cost was circa $0.3 million and was completed in January 2019.
Since the acquisition date, ZenMate has contributed $0.55 million to group revenues, profit of $0.1 million to group loss and
$0.4 million to segment results (as set out on note 4). If the acquisition had occurred on 1 January 2018, group revenue would
have been $54.2 million, group loss for the period would have been $1.7 million and the app distribution segmental result
would have been $26.7 million.
Acquisition costs of $0.1 million arose as a result of the transaction. These have been recognised as part of administrative
expenses in the statement of comprehensive income.
21 Discontinued operation
(a) Description
On 26 July 2018, the Group sold the Media division to Ecom Online Ltd. As for the sale date, the Media division included
Clearvelvet Trading Limited (“Clearvelvet”) and Intangible assets of the Media CGU. This sale is in-line with the Company’s
strategy to develop and distribute its own cybersecurity products.
As consideration, the Group will receive a 50% share of EBITDA from the Media division for the next five years following the
sale, which will be reinvested in the Group’s core App Distribution segment, where all Media division employees were be
transferred to.
In order to calculate contingent consideration, the recoverable value has been determined from value in use calculations
based on cash flow projections for the next five years agreed upon with the acquiree.
The discount rate used in the valuation was 25 per cent. If the discount rate was increased by 1 percentage point the effect
would have been $0.03 million. There is no reasonably possible change in assumption that would give rise to an impairment.
(d) Right-to-use assets and Lease liabilities to related parties (Note 23)
2018 2017
$’000 $’000
23 Operating leases
Effective January 1, 2018, the Company early adopted IFRS 16, which specifies how to recognize, measure, present and
disclose leases. The Company has not restated comparatives for the 2017 reporting period, as permitted under the specific
transitional provisions in the standard. The reclassifications and the adjustments arising from the new leasing rules are
therefore recognised in the opening balance sheet on 1 January 2018.
On initial application, the group recognised lease liabilities in relation to leases which had previously been classified as
‘operating leases’ under the principles of IAS 17 Leases. These liabilities were measured at the present value of the remaining
lease payments, discounted using the lessee’s incremental borrowing rate as of 1 January 2018. The weighted average
lessee’s incremental borrowing rate applied to the lease liabilities on 1 January 2018 was 4.49%. The Company has elected to
record right-of-use assets based on the corresponding lease liability.
In applying IFRS 16 for the first time, the group has used the following practical expedients permitted by the standard:
• The use of a single discount rate to a portfolio of leases with reasonably similar characteristics
• Reliance on previous assessments on whether leases are onerous
• The exclusion of initial direct costs for the measurement of the right-of-use asset at the date of initial application; and
• The use of hindsight in determining the lease term where the contract contains options to extend or terminate the lease.
The group has also elected not to reassess whether a contract is, or contains a lease at the date of initial application. Instead,
for contracts entered into before the transition date the group relied on its assessment made applying IAS 17 and IFRIC 4
Determining whether an Arrangement contains a Lease.
The Company’s operating lease liability at December 31, 2017, as previously disclosed in the Company’s consolidated financial
statements (2017: $578,000) differs from the lease liability recognised on initial application of IFRS 16 at January 1, 2018
$1,408,550. The differences attributed mainly to, management assumptions for periods of the leases contract, and the
Company decision to apply the practical expedient to account for each lease component and any non-lease components as a
single lease component.
Right-of-Use Assets
Real estate
leases Vehicles Total
$’000 $’000 $’000
The Group had sub-leased one of the Right-of-use asset on 2018, for total consideration of $0.1 million.
Lease liabilities
Real estate
leases Vehicles Total
$’000 $’000 $’000
The Company leases various offices and vehicles. Lease terms are negotiated on an individual basis and contain a wide range
of different terms and conditions. The lease agreements do not impose any covenants.
Extension and termination options are included in a number of property and equipment leases across the group. These terms
are used to maximize operational flexibility in terms of managing contracts.
24 Contingent liabilities
The Group had no contingent liabilities as at 31 December 2018.
25 Deferred consideration
(a) Acquisition of AjillionMax
The consideration for the acquisition of certain assets of AjilionMAX Limited in May 2014 included $654,000 deferred
consideration. Of this $104,000 was repaid during the year ending 31 December 2014, $156,000 was repaid during the year
ending 31 December 2015, $189,000 was repaid during the year ending 31 December 2016 and the remainder was repaid
during the year ending 31 December 2017.
In addition, $435,000, included as part of the acquisition arrangements, has been recognised directly in the income statement
during the year ending 31 December 2015, out of which $209,000 was paid in May 2017.
26 Subsequent events
There were no material events after the reporting period, which have a bearing on the understanding of the consolidated.
Shareholder information, including financial results, news and information on products and services, can be found
at www.kape.com.