0% found this document useful (0 votes)
59 views11 pages

06-Zeros of An Analytic Function.

The document discusses zeros of analytic functions. It defines zeros of multiplicity for analytic functions and entire functions which are defined and analytic over the whole complex plane. It proves that entire functions have a power series representation with an infinite radius of convergence. It also discusses that non-constant entire functions are never bounded using Liouville's Theorem and that non-constant polynomials have at least one zero by the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra.

Uploaded by

Vrinda
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
59 views11 pages

06-Zeros of An Analytic Function.

The document discusses zeros of analytic functions. It defines zeros of multiplicity for analytic functions and entire functions which are defined and analytic over the whole complex plane. It proves that entire functions have a power series representation with an infinite radius of convergence. It also discusses that non-constant entire functions are never bounded using Liouville's Theorem and that non-constant polynomials have at least one zero by the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra.

Uploaded by

Vrinda
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

ZEROS of an ANALYTIC

FUNCTION.
MMATH18-102

Zeros of an Analytic Function 1


𝑫𝒆𝒇𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 ∶ 𝐼𝑓 𝑓: 𝐺 → 𝐶 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑎 𝑖𝑛 𝐺 𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑓𝑖𝑒𝑠 𝑓 𝑎 = 0 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑎 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝒛𝒆𝒓𝒐 𝒐𝒇 𝒇 𝒐𝒇 𝒎𝒖𝒍𝒕𝒊𝒑𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒊𝒕𝒚
𝑚 ≥ 1 𝑖𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑔: 𝐺 → 𝐶 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑓 𝑧 = 𝑧 − 𝑎 𝑚 𝑔 𝑧 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑔(𝑎) ≠ 0.

𝑫𝒆𝒇𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 ∶ 𝐴𝑛 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑒 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑤ℎ𝑖𝑐ℎ 𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑑 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑤ℎ𝑜𝑙𝑒
𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑥 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑒 𝐶. 𝐸𝑥𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑒 ∶ 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙, 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑒 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛, 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑦𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑠.

𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏

∶ 𝐼𝑓 𝑓 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑒 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑓 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝑓 𝑧 = ෍ 𝑎𝑛 𝑧 𝑛 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑢𝑠 𝑜𝑐𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒.
𝑛=0
𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒐𝒇: 𝑆𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑓 𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑡 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑖𝑛 𝐵 0; 𝑅 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑛𝑦 𝑅 > 0. ∴ 𝑓 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛

𝑓 𝑧 = ෍ 𝑎𝑛 𝑧 𝑛 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑧 = 0 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑢𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 ≥ 𝑅.


𝑛=0
𝐿𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑅 → ∞ 𝑤𝑒 𝑔𝑒𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡.

𝑵𝒐𝒕𝒆 ∶ 𝐸𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑒 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑐𝑎𝑛 𝑏𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑦𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑠 𝑜𝑓 ′𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑒 ′ .


𝐴 𝑛𝑜𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑦𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑑.
𝐼𝑓 𝑝 𝑧 = 𝑧 𝑛 + 𝑎𝑛−1 𝑧 𝑛−1 + . . +𝑎1 𝑧 + 𝑎0 𝑏𝑒 𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑛 − 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑦𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑎𝑙, 𝑛 ≥ 1.
𝑎𝑛−1 𝑎0
𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑛 lim 𝑝(𝑧) = lim 𝑧 𝑛 1 + . . . + 𝑛 = ∞.
𝑧→∞ 𝑧→∞ 𝑧 𝑧

𝐼𝑛 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡 𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑛 − 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑒 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑑.

Zeros of an Analytic Function 2


𝑳𝒊𝒐𝒖𝒗𝒊𝒍𝒍𝒆′ 𝒔 𝑻𝒉𝒆𝒐𝒓𝒆𝒎: 𝐼𝑓 𝑓 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑑 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑒 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑓 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡.

𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒐𝒇 ∶ 𝑆𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑒 𝑓 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑑 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑒 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛. 𝐿𝑒𝑡 𝑓 𝑧 ≤ 𝑀 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑧 𝑖𝑛 𝐶.


𝐿𝑒𝑡 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑎𝑠 𝑓 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑖𝑛 𝐵 𝑧; 𝑅 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑛𝑦 𝑅 > 0 𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐶𝑎𝑢𝑐ℎ𝑦 ′ 𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑤𝑒 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒;
1! 𝑀
𝑓′ 𝑧 ≤ . 𝑇ℎ𝑖𝑠 ℎ𝑜𝑙𝑑𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑅 > 0 ∴ 𝑙𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑅 → ∞ 𝑤𝑒 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑓 ′ 𝑧 = 0.
𝑅
𝑊𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑓 ′ 𝑧 = 0 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑧 𝑖𝑛 𝐶 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐶 𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 ⟹ 𝑓 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡.

𝑭𝒖𝒏𝒅𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝑻𝒉𝒆𝒐𝒓𝒆𝒎 𝒐𝒇 𝑨𝒍𝒈𝒆𝒃𝒓𝒂: 𝐼𝑓 𝑝 𝑧 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑛 − 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑦𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑥


𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑝 𝑎 = 0.
𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒐𝒇: 𝐿𝑒𝑡 𝑝 𝑧 𝑏𝑒 𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑛 − 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑦𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑎𝑙.
1
𝑆𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑒 𝑝 𝑧 ≠ 0 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑧 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑓 𝑧 = 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑒 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛.
𝑝 𝑧
𝑆𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑝 𝑧 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑛 − 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑦𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑎𝑙 ∴ lim 𝑝 𝑧 = ∞ ⟹ lim 𝑓 𝑧 = 0
𝑧→∞ 𝑧→∞
𝑊ℎ𝑖𝑐ℎ 𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛𝑠 𝑔𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑛 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 1 > 0 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑅 > 0 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑓 𝑧 < 1 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑧 > 𝑅.
𝐴𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑛 𝑓 𝑏𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑖𝑡 𝑖𝑠 𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑑 𝑖𝑛 𝐵ത 0; 𝑅 , ∴ 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑀 > 0 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑓 𝑧 ≤ 𝑀 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 |𝑧| ≤ 𝑅.
𝐻𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑓 𝑧 ≤ max 1, 𝑀 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑧, 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑤𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑓 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑑 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑒 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛.
𝑇ℎ𝑢𝑠 𝑏𝑦 𝐿𝑖𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑒 ′ 𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑓 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 ⟹ 𝑝 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑙𝑠𝑜 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡, 𝑤ℎ𝑖𝑐ℎ 𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑒.
𝐻𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑥 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑝 𝑎 = 0.

sin 𝑧, cos 𝑧 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑒 𝑧 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑑. 𝐴 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑦𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑎𝑙 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑦 𝑧𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑡𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑒.

Zeros of an Analytic Function 3


𝑪𝒐𝒓𝒐𝒍𝒍𝒂𝒓𝒚 ∶ 𝐼𝑓 𝑝 𝑧 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑦𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑎1 , . . . , 𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑡𝑠 𝑧𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑎𝑗 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑘𝑗 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛
𝑝 𝑧 = 𝑐 𝑧 − 𝑎1 𝑘1 . . . 𝑧 − 𝑎𝑚 𝑘𝑚 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑐 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑘1 + . . . +𝑘𝑚 𝑖𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑝.

𝑘1
𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒐𝒇: 𝑆𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑎1 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑧𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑜𝑓 𝑝 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑘1 𝑤𝑒 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑝 𝑧 = 𝑧 − 𝑎1 𝑔1 𝑧
𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑔1 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐, 𝑖𝑛 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑦𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑔1 (𝑎1 ) ≠ 0.
𝑘2
𝐴𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑛 𝑎2 𝑖𝑠 𝑧𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑜𝑓 𝑝 𝑧 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑘2 , 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑔1 , ℎ𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑔1 𝑧 = 𝑧 − 𝑎2 𝑔2 𝑧 , 𝑡ℎ𝑢𝑠;
𝑝 𝑧 = 𝑧 − 𝑎1 𝑘1 𝑧 − 𝑎2 𝑘2 𝑔2 𝑧 , 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑔2 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑔2 𝑎1 ≠ 0 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑔2 𝑎2 ≠ 0.
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝑎𝑓𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑚 𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑝 𝑤𝑒 𝑔𝑒𝑡 𝑝 𝑧 = 𝑔𝑚 𝑧 𝑧 − 𝑎1 𝑘1 . . . 𝑧 − 𝑎𝑚 𝑘𝑚 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑔𝑚 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ;
𝑔𝑚 𝑎1 ≠ 0, . . . 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑔𝑚 𝑎𝑚 ≠ 0 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑎1 , . . . , 𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑧𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑝 𝑧 ∴ 𝑔𝑚 𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡.
𝑝 𝑧 = 𝑐 𝑧 − 𝑎1 𝑘1 . . . 𝑧 − 𝑎𝑚 𝑘𝑚 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑐.
𝑆𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑦𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑎𝑙 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑦 𝑧𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑡𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑤𝑒 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑘1 + . . . +𝑘𝑚 𝑖𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑝. ∎

𝐿𝑒𝑡 𝑝 𝑧 𝑏𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑦𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑓 𝑑𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑛.


𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑛𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑥 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑐, 𝑝 𝑧 − 𝑐 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑦𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑓 𝑑𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑛, ℎ𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑖𝑡 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑛 𝑧𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑠.
𝑇ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑝 𝑧 = 𝑐 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑛 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠.
𝑻𝒉𝒖𝒔 𝒂 𝒑𝒐𝒍𝒚𝒏𝒐𝒎𝒊𝒂𝒍 𝒐𝒇 𝒅𝒆𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒆 𝒏 𝒂𝒔𝒔𝒖𝒎𝒆𝒔 𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒚 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒑𝒍𝒆𝒙 𝒏𝒖𝒎𝒃𝒆𝒓 𝒏 − 𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒆𝒔.

𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑣𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑏𝑒 𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛, for example 𝑒 𝑧 𝑑𝑜𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒 0.

Zeros of an Analytic Function 4


𝑵𝒆𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒃𝒐𝒖𝒓𝒉𝒐𝒐𝒅 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑳𝒊𝒎𝒊𝒕 𝒑𝒐𝒊𝒏𝒕 ∶

𝑰. 𝐴 𝑛𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑟ℎ𝑜𝑜𝑑 𝑛𝑏𝑑 𝑜𝑓 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑎 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑒𝑡 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎. 𝐼𝑛 𝐶, 𝐵 𝑎; 𝑟 , 𝑟 > 0 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑛𝑏𝑑 𝑜𝑓 𝑎.

𝐴 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛 𝑎 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑡 𝐴 𝑖𝑓 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦 𝑛𝑏𝑑 𝑜𝑓 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑠 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝐴 𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛 𝑎.

𝐼𝑛 𝐶 𝑖𝑓 𝑎 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝐴 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦 𝑟 > 0 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑎; 𝑟 ∩ 𝐴 ∖ 𝑎 .

𝑇ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 0 < 𝑏 − 𝑎 < 𝑟.

𝑰𝑰. 𝐼𝑓 𝑎 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝐴 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝐴 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡𝑜 𝑎.


(𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑣𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑡 𝑎𝑠 𝑤𝑒𝑙𝑙. )

𝑰𝑰𝑰. 𝐼𝑓 𝑓 𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑜𝑢𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑓 𝑎 ≠ 0 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑛𝑏𝑑 𝑜𝑓 𝑎 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑓 𝑑𝑜𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑠ℎ.
𝑇ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑟 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑓 𝑧 ≠ 0 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑧 𝑖𝑛 𝐵(𝑎; 𝑟)

𝑰𝑽. 𝐼𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑠𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝐴 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑠 𝑡𝑜 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑖𝑛 𝐴 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝐴 𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑑.

Zeros of an Analytic Function 5


𝑰𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝑻𝒉𝒆𝒐𝒓𝒆𝒎:

𝐿𝑒𝑡 𝐺 𝑏𝑒 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑛 𝑠𝑒𝑡 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑙𝑒𝑡 𝑓: 𝐺 → 𝐶 𝑏𝑒 𝑎𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛.


𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑤𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠:
𝑎 𝑓 ≡ 0 𝑓 𝑧 = 0 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑧 𝑖𝑛 𝐺 ;
𝑏 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑎 𝑖𝑛 𝐺 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑓 𝑛 𝑎 = 0 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑎𝑐ℎ 𝑛 ≥ 0 ;
𝑐 𝑧 ∈ 𝐺 ∶ 𝑓 𝑧 = 0 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑖𝑛 𝐺.

𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 ∶
1
𝐼𝑓 𝑓: 𝐷 → 𝐶 𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑓𝑖𝑒𝑠 𝑓 = 5 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑛 = 2, 3, 4, … . 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑓 𝑧 = 5 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑧 𝑖𝑛 𝐷.
𝑛
𝐼𝑓 𝑓 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑔 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑒 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑓 𝑧 = 𝑔 𝑧 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑧 ∈ 2,4 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑓 ≡ 𝑔.

1+𝑧 𝑛𝜋 − 2
𝐼𝑓 𝑓 𝑧 = 𝑐𝑜𝑠 , 𝑧 < 1. 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑧𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑓 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑠 ∶ 𝑛 𝑖𝑠 𝑜𝑑𝑑
1−𝑧 𝑛𝜋 + 2
𝐹 𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑜 𝑧𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑖𝑛 𝐷 𝑏𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑧𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑓 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑧 = 1 ∉ 𝐷.

Zeros of an Analytic Function 6


𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒐𝒇 ∶ 𝑎 ⇒ 𝑏 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑎 ⇒ 𝑐 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑏𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑢𝑠.
𝐼𝑓 𝑓 ≡ 0 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑓 𝑛 𝑧 = 0 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑧 𝑖𝑛 𝐺, 𝑤ℎ𝑖𝑐ℎ 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑠 (𝑏).
𝐴𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑛 𝑖𝑓 𝑓 ≡ 0 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑧 ∈ 𝐺 ∶ 𝑓 𝑧 = 0 = 𝐺 𝑤𝑖𝑐ℎ 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑙𝑦 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡, 𝑤ℎ𝑖𝑐ℎ 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑠 𝑐 .
𝑐 ⇒ 𝑏 . 𝐿𝑒𝑡 𝑎 ∈ 𝐺 𝑏𝑒 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑍 = 𝑧 ∈ 𝐺 ∶ 𝑓 𝑧 = 0 , 𝑤𝑒 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑤𝑓 𝑛 𝑎 = 0 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑛.
𝐿𝑒𝑡 𝑅 > 0 𝑏𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝐵 𝑎; 𝑅 ⊂ 𝐺 𝐺 𝑖𝑠 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑛 .
𝑆𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑎 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑍 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑎𝑛 𝑖𝑛 𝑍 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡𝑜 𝑎.
𝑆𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑓 𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑜𝑢𝑠 𝑓 𝑎 = 𝑓 lim 𝑎𝑛 = lim 𝑓(𝑎𝑛 ) = lim 0 = 0.
𝑆𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑒𝑟 𝑛 ≥ 1 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑓 𝑎 = 𝑓 ′ 𝑎 = . . . = 𝑓 𝑛−1
𝑎 = 0 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑓 𝑛
𝑎 ≠ 0.

𝐸𝑥𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑓 𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠 𝑓 𝑧 = ෍ 𝑎𝑘 (𝑧 − 𝑎)𝑘 = 𝑎𝑛 (𝑧 − 𝑎)𝑛 +𝑎𝑛+1 𝑧 − 𝑎 𝑛+1


+. . . 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑧 − 𝑎 < 𝑅.
∞ 𝑘=𝑛

𝐿𝑒𝑡 𝑔 𝑧 = ෍ 𝑎𝑘 (𝑧 − 𝑎)𝑘−𝑛 = 𝑎𝑛 + 𝑎𝑛+1 𝑧 − 𝑎 + 𝑎𝑛+2 (𝑧 − 𝑎)2 +. . . . , 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑔 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑖𝑛 𝐵 𝑎; 𝑅


𝑘=𝑛
𝐴𝑙𝑠𝑜 𝑓 𝑧 = 𝑧 − 𝑎 𝑛 𝑔 𝑧 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑔 𝑎 = 𝑎𝑛 ≠ 0.
𝑆𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑔 𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑜𝑢𝑠 𝑖𝑛 𝐵 𝑎; 𝑅 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑔 𝑎 ≠ 0 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑟; 0 < 𝑟 < 𝑅 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑔 𝑧 ≠ 0 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑎; 𝑟
𝑇ℎ𝑢𝑠 𝑓 𝑧 = 𝑧 − 𝑎 𝑛 𝑔 𝑧 ≠ 0 𝑓𝑜𝑟 0 < 𝑧 − 𝑎 < 𝑟. . . (i)
𝑁𝑜𝑤 𝑎 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑍 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐵 𝑎; 𝑟 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑛𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑟ℎ𝑜𝑜𝑑 𝑜𝑓 𝑎, 𝑓 𝑏 = 0 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑜𝑚𝑒 0 < 𝑏 − 𝑎 < 𝑟.
𝑇ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑠 𝑖 .
𝐻𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑓 𝑛 𝑎 = 0 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑛 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 (𝑏).

Zeros of an Analytic Function 7


𝑏 ⇒ 𝑎 𝐺𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑛 ∶ 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑎 𝑖𝑛 𝐺 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑓 𝑛 𝑎 = 0 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑎𝑐ℎ 𝑛 ≥ 0. 𝑇𝑜 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑤: 𝑓 ≡ 0

𝐿𝑒𝑡 𝐴 = 𝑧 ∈ 𝐺 ∶ 𝑓 𝑛 𝑧 = 0 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑎𝑐ℎ 𝑛 ≥ 0 . 𝐵𝑦 ℎ𝑦𝑝𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑠 𝐴 ≠ ∅.


𝑊𝑒 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑤 𝐴 𝑖𝑠 𝑏𝑜𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑐𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝑖𝑛 𝐺.
𝐿𝑒𝑡 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴ҧ 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑙𝑒𝑡 𝑧𝑛 𝑏𝑒 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝐴 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡𝑜 𝑧.
𝑆𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑒𝑎𝑐ℎ 𝑓 (𝑘) 𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑜𝑢𝑠 𝑤𝑒 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 ;
𝑓 𝑘 𝑧 = 𝑓 𝑘 lim 𝑧𝑛 = lim 𝑓 𝑘 𝑧𝑛 = lim 0 = 0 ∀ 𝑘 𝑎𝑠 𝑧𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑓 𝑘
𝑧𝑛 = 0 ∀𝑘 𝑎𝑛𝑑 ∀𝑛
𝑊ℎ𝑖𝑐ℎ 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑤𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝒔𝒉𝒐𝒘𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝑨 𝒊𝒔 𝒄𝒍𝒐𝒔𝒆𝒅.

𝐿𝑒𝑡 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑅 > 0 𝑏𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝐵 𝑎; 𝑅 ⊂ 𝐺 𝐺 𝑖𝑠 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑛 .


𝐵𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑖𝑛 𝐵 𝑎; 𝑅 𝑓 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛;

𝑛
𝑓 𝑛 (𝑎)
𝑓 𝑧 = ෍ 𝑎𝑛 (𝑧 − 𝑎) 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑧 − 𝑎 < 𝑅, 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑛 = = 0 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑛 ≥ 0.
𝑛!
𝑛=0
𝐻𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑓 𝑧 = 0 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑧 𝑖𝑛 𝐵 𝑎; 𝑅 ⇒ 𝑓 𝑛 𝑧 = 0 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑧 𝑖𝑛 𝐵 𝑎; 𝑅 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑛 ≥ 0.
𝑇ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝐵 𝑎; 𝑅 ⊂ 𝐴 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒗𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝑨 𝒊𝒔 𝒐𝒑𝒆𝒏.

𝐻𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝐴 𝑖𝑠 𝑏𝑜𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑐𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝑖𝑛 𝐺. 𝐺 𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐴 ≠ ∅ 𝑎𝑛𝑑 ℎ𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝐴 = 𝐺.


𝑇ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑓 𝑧 = 0 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑧 𝑖𝑛 𝐺 ⇒ 𝑓 ≡ 0.∎

Zeros of an Analytic Function 8


𝑪𝒐𝒓𝒐𝒍𝒍𝒂𝒓𝒚 𝟏: 𝐼𝑓 𝑓 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑔 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑜𝑛 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐺 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛
𝑓 ≡ 𝑔 𝑖𝑓𝑓 𝑧 ∈ 𝐺 ∶ 𝑓 𝑧 = 𝑔 𝑧 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡.
𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒐𝒇: 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ℎ 𝑧 = 𝑓 𝑧 − 𝑔 𝑧 𝑜𝑛 𝐺.
𝑊𝑒 𝑘𝑛𝑜𝑤 ℎ ≡ 0 𝑖𝑓𝑓 𝑧 ∈ 𝐺 ∶ ℎ 𝑧 = 0 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝐺. ∎

𝑪𝒐𝒓𝒐𝒍𝒍𝒂𝒓𝒚 𝟐 ∶ 𝐼𝑓 𝑓 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑛 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑒𝑡 𝐺 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑓 𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑧𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑎𝑐ℎ 𝑎 𝑖𝑛 𝐺
𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑓 𝑎 = 0 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑒𝑟 𝑛 ≥ 1 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑎𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑔: 𝐺 → 𝐶 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑔 𝑎 ≠ 0
𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑓 𝑧 = (𝑧 − 𝑎)𝑛 𝑔 𝑧 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑧 𝑖𝑛 𝐺.
𝑇ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑖𝑠 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒛𝒆𝒓𝒐𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒂𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒚𝒕𝒊𝒄 𝒇𝒖𝒏𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒇𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒆 𝒎𝒖𝒍𝒕𝒊𝒑𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒊𝒕𝒚.
𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒐𝒇 ∶ 𝑊𝑒 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑓 𝑎 = 0. 𝐿𝑒𝑡 𝑛 𝑏𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑠𝑡 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑒𝑟 ≥ 1 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑓 𝑛−1 𝑎 = 0.
𝐶𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑦 𝑓 𝑎 = 𝑓 ′ 𝑎 = . . . = 𝑓 𝑛−1
𝑎 = 0 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑓 𝑛
𝑎 ≠ 0.

𝑧 − 𝑎 −𝑛 𝑓 𝑧 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑧 ≠ 𝑎;
𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑒 𝑔 𝑧 = ൞ 1
𝑓 𝑛 𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑧 = 𝑎.
𝑛!
𝐶𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑦 𝑔 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑜𝑛 𝐺 ∖ 𝑎 .

𝐼𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑛𝑏𝑑 𝐵 𝑎; 𝑅 ⊂ 𝐺 𝑜𝑓 𝑧 = 𝑎 𝑤𝑒 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑓 𝑧 = ෍ 𝑎𝑘 (𝑧 − 𝑎)𝑘 = 𝑎𝑛 (𝑧 − 𝑎)𝑛 +𝑎𝑛+1 𝑧 − 𝑎 𝑛+1


+. . .
𝑘=𝑛
−𝑛
𝑇ℎ𝑢𝑠 𝑔 𝑧 = 𝑧 − 𝑎 𝑓 𝑧 = 𝑎𝑛 + 𝑎𝑛+1 𝑧 − 𝑎 + 𝑎𝑛+2 (𝑧 − 𝑎)2 +. . . 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑎; 𝑅 ∖ 𝑎 , 𝑤ℎ𝑖𝑐ℎ 𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑦 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐.
1
𝐴𝑙𝑠𝑜 lim 𝑔(𝑧) = 𝑎𝑛 = 𝑓 𝑛 𝑎 = 𝑔 𝑎 ⟹ 𝑔 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑖𝑛 𝑎 𝑛𝑏𝑑 𝑜𝑓 𝑎.
𝑧→𝑎 𝑛!
𝐻𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑔 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑖𝑛 𝐺 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑦 𝑓 𝑧 = (𝑧 − 𝑎)𝑛 𝑔 𝑧 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑧 𝑖𝑛 𝐺 𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑. ∎

Zeros of an Analytic Function 9


𝑪𝒐𝒓𝒐𝒍𝒍𝒂𝒓𝒚 𝟑: 𝐿𝑒𝑡 𝑓: 𝐺 → 𝐶 𝑏𝑒 𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑛 − 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛, 𝑎 ∈ 𝐺 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑓 𝑎 = 0 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑅 > 0
𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝐵 𝑎; 𝑅 ⊂ 𝐺 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑓 𝑧 ≠ 0 𝑓𝑜𝑟 0 < 𝑧 − 𝑎 < 𝑅.
(𝒛𝒆𝒓𝒐𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒂𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒚𝒕𝒊𝒄 𝒇𝒖𝒏𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝒂𝒓𝒆 𝒊𝒔𝒐𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒅)
𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒐𝒇 ∶ 𝑆𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑓 𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑛 − 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑍 = 𝑧 ∈ 𝐺 ∶ 𝑓 𝑧 = 0 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑖𝑛 𝐺, 𝑖, 𝑒 𝑎 𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑍.
𝑇ℎ𝑢𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑛𝑏𝑑 𝑜𝑓 𝑎 𝑤ℎ𝑖𝑐ℎ 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑍 𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛 𝑎.
𝑇ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑖𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑅 > 0 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝐵 𝑎; 𝑅 ⊂ 𝐺 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑧 ∉ 𝑍 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 𝑎; 𝑅 ∖ 𝑎 .
𝑊ℎ𝑖𝑐ℎ 𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛𝑠 𝑓 𝑧 ≠ 0 𝑓𝑜𝑟 0 < 𝑧 − 𝑎 < 𝑅. ∎

𝑴𝒂𝒙𝒊𝒎𝒖𝒎 𝑴𝒐𝒅𝒖𝒍𝒖𝒔 𝑻𝒉𝒆𝒐𝒓𝒆𝒎: 𝐼𝑓 𝐺 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑓: 𝐺 → 𝐶 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑎 𝑖𝑛 𝐺 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ
𝑓 𝑎 ≥ 𝑓 𝑧 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑧 𝑖𝑛 𝐺, 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑓 𝑖𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡.
𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒐𝒇 ∶ 𝐿𝑒𝑡 𝐵ത 𝑎; 𝑟 ⊂ 𝐺, 𝛾 𝑡 = 𝑎 + 𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑡 𝑓𝑜𝑟 0 ≤ 𝑡 ≤ 2𝜋 ; 𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐶𝑎𝑢𝑐ℎ𝑦 ′ 𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑘
2𝜋 2𝜋
1 𝑓(𝑤) 1 𝑓(𝑎 + 𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑡 ) 𝑖𝑡
1
𝑓 𝑎 = න 𝑑𝑤 = න 𝑖𝑡
𝑖𝑟𝑒 𝑑t = න 𝑓(𝑎 + 𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑡 ) 𝑑𝑡.
2𝜋𝑖 𝛾 𝑤 − 𝑎 2𝜋𝑖 0 𝑟𝑒 2𝜋 0
2𝜋 2𝜋
1 1
𝑊ℎ𝑖𝑐ℎ 𝑔𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑠 𝑓 𝑎 ≤ න |𝑓(𝑎 + 𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑡 ) |𝑑𝑡 ≤ න |𝑓(𝑎 |𝑑𝑡 = 𝑓 𝑎 𝑤ℎ𝑖𝑐ℎ 𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛𝑠 𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒.
2𝜋 0 2𝜋 0
1 2𝜋
𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑚𝑖𝑑𝑑𝑙𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑠 0 =
2𝜋
‫׬‬0 {|𝑓(𝑎)| − |𝑓(𝑎 + 𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑡 ) |}𝑑𝑡 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑛 − 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒.
𝑇ℎ𝑢𝑠 𝑓 𝑎 + 𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑡 = 𝑓 𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑟 > 0 𝑎𝑛𝑑 0 ≤ 𝑡 ≤ 2𝜋 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝐵ത 𝑎; 𝑟 ⊂ 𝐺.
𝑇ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛𝑠 𝑓 𝑚𝑎𝑝𝑠 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑘 𝐵 𝑎; 𝑟 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑖𝑟𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑖𝑟𝑐𝑙𝑒 𝑤 = 𝜌 = |𝑓(𝑎)|.
𝑇ℎ𝑢𝑠, 𝑓 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑖𝑛 𝐵 𝑎; 𝑟 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑎𝑠 𝑓 𝑧 = 𝑓 𝑎 = 𝛼 𝑖𝑛 𝐵 𝑎; 𝑟 𝐵 𝑎; 𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑙𝑦 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 .
𝐵𝑦 𝐼𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑓 𝑧 = 𝛼 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑧 𝑖𝑛 𝐺.∎

Zeros of an Analytic Function 10


𝑬𝒙 𝟔. 𝐿𝑒𝑡 𝐺 𝑏𝑒 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑓: 𝐺 → 𝐶 𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑎 𝑖𝑛 𝐺 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ
𝑓 𝑎 ≤ 𝑓 𝑧 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑧 𝑖𝑛 𝐺, 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑤 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑒𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑓 𝑎 = 0 𝑜𝑟 𝑓 𝑖𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑀𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑙𝑢𝑠 𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑚 .

𝑯𝒊𝒏𝒕: 𝐼𝑓 𝑓 𝑎 = 0, 𝑑𝑜𝑛𝑒. 𝑆𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑒 𝑓 𝑎 ≠ 0 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 0 < 𝑓 𝑎 < 𝑓 𝑧 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑧 𝑖𝑛 𝐺. 𝑇ℎ𝑢𝑠 𝑓 𝑑𝑜𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑠ℎ 𝑜𝑛 𝐺.
1 1 1 1 1
𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑜𝑛 𝐺 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑓𝑖𝑒𝑠 (𝑎) = ≥ = 𝑧 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑧 𝑖𝑛 𝐺.
𝑓 𝑓 |𝑓(𝑎)| 𝑓 𝑧 𝑓
1
𝐴𝑝𝑝𝑙𝑦 𝑀𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑀𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑙𝑢𝑠 𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑜 .
𝑓

𝑬𝒙 𝟖. 𝐿𝑒𝑡 𝐺 𝑏𝑒 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑙𝑒𝑡 𝑓 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑔 𝑏𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑜𝑛 𝐺 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑓 𝑧 𝑔 𝑧 = 0 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑧 𝑖𝑛 𝐺.
𝑆ℎ𝑜𝑤 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑒𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑓 ≡ 0 𝑜𝑟 𝑔 ≡ 0.
𝑯𝒊𝒏𝒕 ∶ 𝐼𝑓 𝑓 ≡ 0 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑑𝑜𝑛𝑒. 𝑆𝑢𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑒 𝑓 ≢ 0 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑖𝑛 𝐺 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑓 𝑎 ≠ 0.
𝐵𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑛𝑏𝑑 𝐵 𝑎; 𝑟 ⊂ 𝐺 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡
𝑓 𝑧 ≠ 0 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑧 𝑖𝑛 𝐵 𝑎; 𝑟 ⟹ 𝑔 𝑧 = 0 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑧 𝑖𝑛 𝐵 𝑎; 𝑟 .
𝑆𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝐵 𝑎; 𝑟 ℎ𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑔 ≡ 0 𝑜𝑛 𝐺.

(𝑆𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑒 𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 ′𝑧𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑜𝑓 𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑦𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑖𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 ′ . )

Zeros of an Analytic Function 11

You might also like