Senior Project Final Essay
Senior Project Final Essay
Senior Project Final Essay
Juliana Dangond
Senior Project
Most people in Catholic, misogynistic societies have been taught to never question the
status quo, especially when it comes to gender roles. And, although we live in a world where
women are fighting for the rights, equality, and recognition they deserve, most people in these
societies don’t openly discuss why women are at a disadvantage. When they do ask questions
like “why sex is seen as shameful for women but triumphant for men?”, “why are gender
stereotypes are so sharply defined?”, or “how did men establish superiority over women?”, the
Church tends to dismiss these inquiries with an explanation along the lines of “because God
wanted it that way” or “because the Bible said so''. However, the Church knows that the real
answers to these questions mostly lie in its brutal and dark past, which is probably why most
schools (not necessarily just Catholic schools) that have Catholic religion classes only focus
lessons on the history of the bible and its teachings, the moral truths behind religion, and
memorization of Catholic rites and prayers. The Church’s deceitful and violent history is vaguely
mentioned or skipped entirely. However, the Church’s dark era is an essential part of history that
shouldn’t be overlooked and has major implications for the world today. So, should modern
schools that have Catholic curriculums include the Church’s deceitful and violent history in their
lessons? Would such an educational shift be constructive in today's society or would it create
confusion and chaos? To determine if this change is appropriate in current Catholic misogynistic
Dangond, 2
societies, it is imperative to first go back in time and examine how the Catholic Church gained its
tremendous influence and created the Catholic misogynistic societal structure we know today.
Before the Church became the dominating religion known today, paganism was the
primary belief system in western Europe. Although its meaning has been changed throughout
community observing a polytheistic religion, as the ancient Romans and Greeks”. In pagan
societies, women played an indispensable role in social and religious life. For instance, as
Stephen L. Dyson describes in Rome: A Living Portrait of an Ancient City, the cult of Isis and of
the Magna Mater offered women in early ancient Rome leadership roles, like the Magna Mater’s
title of “sacerdos maxima”, within religious life. Later on, came the formation of the Vestals
(priestesses of Vesta, Roman goddess of the sacred hearth and flame), an exclusive female
clerical group that “possessed unique religious distinction, public status and privileges, and could
exercise considerable political influence” (Staples). Additionally, ancient Rome’s highest divine
powers were composed of six, male-female pairs where goddesses would play essential roles in
religious life. Ancient Rome had this established religious structure for centuries, so when the
ascendancy of monotheistic Christianity threatened to dismantle this order in the 4th century AD,
pagan Rome took extreme measures to ensure the survival of their religious empire.
That’s when the persecutions began. Early on, these were sporadic, targeted towards
Christians, and mostly caused by “local conditions and dependent on the attitude of the
governor” according to britannica.com article Relations between Christianity and the Roman
government and the Hellenistic culture. This source also claims that a key cause of these
persecutions was “the Christians’ conscientious rejection of the gods whose favor was believed
to have brought success to the empire”. However, these persecutions became more organized and
Dangond, 3
wide-ranging as the Roman Empire faced a time of crisis during the third century.
Britannica.com states it best: during this time, “economic collapse, political chaos, military
revolt, and barbarian invasion nearly destroyed the empire. Christians were blamed for the
desperate situation because they denied the gods who were thought to protect Rome, thereby
bringing down their wrath. To regain divine protection, the emperors introduced the systematic
persecution of Christians throughout the empire” (Relations between Christianity and the Roman
Government). The worst of these persecutions happened between 303 AD and 311 AD, when,
according to Greek church historian Eusebius, under the reign of co-emperors Diocletian and
Galerius “an imperial decree was published everywhere, ordering the churches to be razed to the
ground and the Scriptures destroyed by fire, and giving notice that those in places of honor
would lose their places, and domestic staff, if they continued to profess Christianity, would be
deprived of their liberty” (Eusebius, History of the Church (VIII.2)). Shortly after, everything
changed with Constantine’s rise to power. This man changed the fate of Christianity and the
future of humanity by stopping Christian persecutions during his reign, but he unknowingly
Flavius Valerius Constantinus, also known as Constantine the Great, was pronounced
emperor after his father’s death in 306 A.D. (Rattini, National Geographic). It’s safe to say that
although Constantine brought changes upon his empire to pacify divisions between pagans and
Christians, he was evidently biased towards Christianity, his personal chosen religion. In an
academic paper titled “Constantine’s Constantinople: A Christian Emperor, A Pagan City”, Mary
Balzer summarizes the social, civic, and religious changes Constantine brought upon his people
when unifying his empire. According to this paper, Constantine was Christian but extremely
mindful that he “could not suddenly change the religious foundation of the state at the same time
Dangond, 4
that he was trying to recapture the traditional role of the emperor and revive the power of the
empire” (Balzer). As the academic paper points out, Constantine took it one step at a time as he
“could not afford to change the state religion of the empire to Christianity when the vast majority
of his citizens were pagans” (Balzer). So, according to the article, Constantine incorporated
pagan allusions in the restructure of his empire through different subtle methods, from displaying
pagan symbolism in Catholic churches to the re-appropriation of pagan statues for Christian
purposes. Constantine also used other unification and conversion tactics as mentioned by
agnostic History.com writer Bart D. Ehrman. For instance, Ehrman claims that in the time during
Constantine’s rule, the idea of an eternal Christian heaven/hell and tales of a single almighty God
were propagated to lower class families to create a steady and effective “grassroot movement”.
This all fed the Catholic Church's slow yet steady growth, and its popularity increased even more
In the year 313 A.D, seven years after Constantine’s rise to power and about one year
after he began the Roman Empire’s Christianization, Constantine and Galerius signed a letter
titled Edict of Milan that proclaimed “Religious Toleration” for all in the Roman Empire. The
Edict of Milan does not directly outlaw paganism. It permits other religions to exist so long as
their followers don’t interfere with the Catholic community. However, the edict’s harsh tone
when describing pagan beliefs implies Constantine’s disapproval of the pagan views he suggests
are false, outmoded illusions. This seemed apparent in a translated version of the edict by the
University of Pennsylvania Department of History, but there could be inconsistencies with the
original speech. Some elements of the letter may have been lost in translation, but various
translations and sources communicate the same message: Constantine, although he did not
Dangond, 5
explicitly condemn pagans, communicated his disapproval of pagan beliefs to his followers who
Ever since Constantine made such insinuations in the Edict of Milan and unleashed a
mass cultural and religious shift in Europe where Christianity was growing, spreading, and
dominating rapidly, treatment towards pagans got progressively worse. According to several
historians, but more specifically Peter Brown, the Church would sporadically close down pagan
temples, prohibit pagan public sacrifices, and passive-aggressively encourage Christian followers
to persecute pagans just as the pagans had done to them a century before. Although there was
very little pressure on individual pagans, the pagan religious community certainly saw the effects
of the passive-aggressive treatment they were receiving. Through the Edict of Milan and the
unification of his empire, Constantine set the foundations, beliefs, and attitudes that eventually
led to these and other violent expressions towards pagans, and at this time, the effects of
After some time, during the Middle Ages, the Catholic Church successfully changed
people’s perceptions of what pagans were. As a World History Encyclopedia article illustrates,
‘Christians’ were then people of the “new religion” (Christianity) and those whose
“long-established pagan beliefs and practices entwined with those of the new religion”.
Basically, Christians were those who were originally Christian and pagans who merged into
Christianity with Constantine’s subtle conversion tactics. The term “pagans” then became, as the
article mentioned, “a Christian designation from the French meaning a 'rustic,' one who came
from the rural countryside”. These “pagans” were considered evil, non-progressing people from
the countryside who had not yet adopted Christianity. Since these people were part of a heresy,
the Church manipulated the true meaning of different pagan elements so that Christian followers
Dangond, 6
would see these countrymen as evil devil worshipers. The wise pagan crones with their pointed
hats became ugly evil witches, characterized by their mystical connection to the natural world
(Inman, Ancient Pagan and Modern Christian Symbolism). Because of these manipulations and
the Church’s vast influence, charms, spells, incantations, and other medieval countryside
traditions associated with country women (or witches) were considered sinful, immoral, and
wicked.
Manipulating remaining pagan symbols and associating them with the ungodly and
devilish was not the only tactic the Church employed to ensure their followers wouldn’t disobey
or return to ancient pagan ideals. An informative article by Joshua J. Mark describes the Church's
power and control in the Middle Ages. As stated in the article, from guilt tripping, exploiting,
and ripping off followers to executing pagan women, the Church employed several harsh control
methods to ensure its followers were in line. In particular, as stated in a World History
Encyclopedia article, the Church would use their teachings on the purgatory to sell “writs known
as indulgences, promising a shorter stay in purgatory for a price” (Mark). The article also
indicated that the Church sold “fake splinters of Christ's cross, a saint's finger or toe, a vial of
water from the Holy Land, or any number of objects, which would allegedly bring luck or ward
off misfortune” (Mark). Another example of these control methods was that when women were
accused of committing witchcraft, they were usually “tied in a sack with their cat… and thrown
into a body of water… [Even] if they managed to escape and come to the surface, they were
found guilty and then executed”. Lastly, the article mentioned that “archbishop[s] could, and
frequently did, threaten a noble, a town, or even a monastery with excommunication”, using this
as bait to manipulate and control whenever they pleased. This all gave the Church an extensive
Dangond, 7
amount of economic resources and a firm grasp on their followers, which translated into the
Now, it's understandable why the Church’s deceitful and violent history was vaguely
mentioned in Catholic religion classes and usually skipped: this information could possibly raise
doubts amongst devoted followers and disrupt the order and control the Church has held for
centuries. The Church surely doesn’t want their followers to know that Constantine and the
Church took inspiration from other religions to enhance, unify, and merge their religion with
others. It would certainly be an outrage if followers were to find out that the iconic picture of
Virgin Mary nursing baby Jesus in her arms was actually not an original, but a concept taken
from the portraits of Devaki nursing Crishna and Horus being nursed by Isis, who also became
miraculously impregnated with Horus. Just as wise crones became evil witches, Poseidon’s triton
transformed into the devil’s pitchfork, and Egyptian sun disks turned into Catholic saints’ halos.
What would followers think of the Church if they knew how the Church persecuted pagans,
charged followers for the absolution of sins, or sold fake Jesus merchandise? Some might argue
that the response mostly wouldn’t be positive, or at least it wouldn’t be in the Church’s favor.
However, the Church’s dark era is an essential part of history that, when analyzed and
understood in its current context, could bring many constructive changes that today’s Catholic
The Church has mostly been the same for centuries. However, it still has potential for
growth and development. If the Church were to embrace its dark past and teach it in a
misogynistic societies could see an increase in tolerance and decrease in stereotyping in future
generations. In the recent past, studies like Pew Research Center’s have shown that out of the
Dangond, 8
people who have left Catholicism, 3% of these have left because they “stopped believing/lost
faith/became skeptical”. This significantly small percentage reflects that the main reason for
leaving Catholicism is not due to a decline of faith or lack thereof, but other reasons like the
“(48%)...dissatisfaction with church teachings about birth control”. If the Church were to claim
that the release of information on their dark past would cause their followers to stop
believing/lose faith/become skeptical, there is little tangible evidence available to support that. In
fact, the release of the Church’s violent history could have rather positive effects on the Catholic
community.
The truth is that most of this information’s educational value does not lie in the literal
historical records on the Church’s dark past, but in the Church’s future transparency, openness,
and willingness to grow, not hide, from mistakes once they release and embrace their past. This
analysis could teach younger generations the importance of fully questioning and investigating
the cultures, beliefs, and backgrounds that surround them. This way, younger generations could
learn to not just accept what they’ve been told since birth was right or wrong, but to ask
questions, develop curiosity, and discover the truth around them. If people were to ask more
questions and seek out the answers themselves, they’d have a more comprehensive
understanding of the world around them. By asking questions like “why sex is seen as shameful
for women but triumphant for men?”, “why are gender stereotypes are so sharply defined?”, or
“how did men establish superiority over women?” (and not settling for answers like “because
God wanted it that way” or “because the Bible said so''), they’d understand that the answers
come from a long and complex history with power struggles and political agendas. If novice
Catholic followers were to see that women are at a disadvantage in their societies not because
Dangond, 9
they are the inferior sex, but because as history unfolded, their image was damaged and the
perception of them altered, there would be more tolerance towards women. Maybe even more
equality, as this realization might spark the initiative in more people to advocate for women’s
equality. Most things around us aren’t the way they are “just because”. Women aren’t at a
disadvantage “just because”. We don’t see indigenous people who believe in various gods as
outdated or inferior “just because”. There is a history and a reason behind the structures and
stereotypes in place today. Hopefully, the Church can see the importance of recognizing the
truths behind who we are, as bright or dark as these may be. Because only then can we
understand and appreciate entirely who we are and the systems we are a part of, and strive to
Bibliography
Pagan City,
https://ecommons.cornell.edu/bitstream/handle/1813/47945/3.6%20Constantine%27s.pdf
?sequence=3.
Brown, Peter (2013). The Rise of Western Christendom: Triumph and Diversity, A.D. 200-1000
Ehrman, Bart D. “Inside the Conversion Tactics of the Early Christian Church.” History.com,
https://www.history.com/news/inside-the-conversion-tactics-of-the-early-christian-church
Eusebius. and Lake, Kirsopp. and Oulton, John Ernest Leonard. and Lawlor, Hugh Jackson. The
“Galerius and Constantine: Edicts of Toleration 311/313.” Internet History Sourcebooks Project,
https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/source/edict-milan.asp.
Inman, Thomas. “Ancient Pagan and Modern Christian Symbolism.” Ancient Pagan and Modern
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/38485/38485-h/38485-h.htm.
“Leaving Catholicism.” Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project, Pew
https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2009/04/27/faith-in-flux3/.
Dangond, 11
https://books.google.com.co/books?id=1zGZQnqWH2MC&pg=PA141&dq=%22gods%2
Bwere%2Bdifferentiated%2Baccording%2Bto%2Bsex%22&hl=en&ei=yWOjTYL0LeO
x0QHpxJWBBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22go
ds%20were%20differentiated%20according%20to%20sex%22&f=false.
https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1411/religion-in-the-middle-ages/.
https://www.worldhistory.org/Medieval_Church/.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/pagan.
Phyllis Culham, "Women in the Roman Republic," in The Cambridge Companion to the Roman
May 2021,
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/constantine#:~:text=Constantine%20
assumed%20sole%20control%20over%20the%20empire%20in%20A.D.%20324.
“Relations between Christianity and the Roman Government and the Hellenistic Culture.”
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Christianity/Relations-between-Christianity-and-the-Ro
man-government-and-the-Hellenistic-culture.
Dangond, 12
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Roman-religion.
Stephen L. Dyson, Rome: A Living Portrait of an Ancient City (Johns Hopkins University Press,
2010), p. 283.
Dangond, 13
Works Cited
Pagan City,
https://ecommons.cornell.edu/bitstream/handle/1813/47945/3.6%20Constantine%27s.pdf
?sequence=3.
Brown, Peter (2013). The Rise of Western Christendom: Triumph and Diversity, A.D. 200-1000
https://penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana/hispania/diocletian.html.
Ehrman, Bart D. “Inside the Conversion Tactics of the Early Christian Church.” History.com,
https://www.history.com/news/inside-the-conversion-tactics-of-the-early-christian-church
Eusebius. and Lake, Kirsopp. and Oulton, John Ernest Leonard. and Lawlor, Hugh Jackson. The
“Galerius and Constantine: Edicts of Toleration 311/313.” Internet History Sourcebooks Project,
https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/source/edict-milan.asp.
Inman, Thomas. “Ancient Pagan and Modern Christian Symbolism.” Ancient Pagan and Modern
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/38485/38485-h/38485-h.htm.
Dangond, 14
https://www.britannica.com/topic/inquisition.
“Leaving Catholicism.” Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project, Pew
https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2009/04/27/faith-in-flux3/.
https://books.google.com.co/books?id=1zGZQnqWH2MC&pg=PA141&dq=%22gods%2
Bwere%2Bdifferentiated%2Baccording%2Bto%2Bsex%22&hl=en&ei=yWOjTYL0LeO
x0QHpxJWBBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22go
ds%20were%20differentiated%20according%20to%20sex%22&f=false.
https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1411/religion-in-the-middle-ages/.
https://www.worldhistory.org/Medieval_Church/.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/pagan.
Phyllis Culham, "Women in the Roman Republic," in The Cambridge Companion to the Roman
May 2021,
Dangond, 15
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/constantine#:~:text=Constantine%20
assumed%20sole%20control%20over%20the%20empire%20in%20A.D.%20324.
“Relations between Christianity and the Roman Government and the Hellenistic Culture.”
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Christianity/Relations-between-Christianity-and-the-Ro
man-government-and-the-Hellenistic-culture.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Roman-religion.
Stephen L. Dyson, Rome: A Living Portrait of an Ancient City (Johns Hopkins University Press,
2010), p. 283.
“The Galileo Project: Christianity: The Inquisition.” The Galileo Project | Christianity | The
Inquisition, http://galileo.rice.edu/chr/inquisition.html.
https://www.servicesforeducation.co.uk/blog/schools/why-is-re-important-in-schools/.