P2P QA Paper 2 v03 1
P2P QA Paper 2 v03 1
P2P QA Paper 2 v03 1
Instructions
1. You should attempt all 68 questions. Each question is worth one mark.
2. Mark all answers on the answer sheet provided. Use a pencil (NOT a pen).
4. This is an open book exam. You can use the Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2 (2017)
for guidance.
7. You will also need the “Additional Information” in the Scenario Booklet to answer some questions.
8. Each question is separate. Do not use information from one question to answer another question.
Q05: During the SU process, the PM facilitates a number of workshops with users and
subject matter experts as they wish to define a clear project product description.
Is this an appropriate application of the “focus on products” principle?
A. No, this is far too much detail required for the project brief.
B. No, as additional workshops should be facilitated in the initiation stage.
C. Yes, as this reduces the risk of user dissatisfaction and acceptance disputes.
D. Yes, as this helps to manage uncontrolled change (“scope creep”).
Q06: After the first PBS workshop, the project manager and the team managers start to
write the product descriptions with input from users.
Which principle is being applied, and why?
A. Continued business justification, as each product description will have a
documented business justification.
B. Continued business justification, as the costs to create all the products need to
be known for the project plan and business case.
C. Focus on products, as product descriptions provide clarity by defining each
product’s purpose, composition, format, etc.
D. Focus on products, as new requirements must be gathered up front before any
work is carried out by the management level.
Q07: At the end of the initiation stage, the project manager adds an extra page to the PID
document which details how PRINCE2 has been tailored to suit the project environment.
Is this an appropriate application of the “tailor to suit the project” principle, and why?
A. Yes, as the project board wishes to review this when making their first decision.
B. Yes, this should be documented in the PID during the initiation stage.
C. No, this should be documented in the project controls document.
D. No, tailoring has to be described and agreed upon in the SU process.
Q08: During the initiation stage, the project manager takes the necessary actions to ensure
that the project controls are appropriate to the project’s scale, complexity, and risk.
Is this an appropriate application of the “tailor to suit the project” principle, and why?
A. No, this is part of the progress theme and not a principle.
B. No, tailoring the project for controlling risk is done by the executive.
C. Yes, as this is a purpose of tailoring.
D. Yes, the project manager will document how the project was tailored to suit the
project as needs to be approved by the change authority.
Q12: This information documented by project manager: “Football Pitch for Community project
implementation will increase the football players in the town by up to 10% and the town will earn 11k
annually. Town Services Manager will check these after project closure.”
Is this an appropriate documentation in the benefits management approach, and why?
A. No, because this information should be documented in the Business Case.
B. No, because the CFO is responsible for realizing project benefits after project closure.
C. Yes, because the PM should document the benefits, timing of measurement, and related
roles in the benefits management approach.
D. Yes, because this is the PM’s responsibility to provide the information needed for the Benefits
Management Approach.
Q13: While reviewing the business case in a project board meeting, the executive asked why the
project manager included the post-project operational cost in the business justification calculation. He
requested an updated business case as operational costs are the portfolio responsibilities and
shouldn’t get included in the project business case calculation.
Is this an appropriate action, and why?
A. Yes, because the project manager should include just a summary of the project costs (taken
from the project plan) in the business case.
B. Yes, as the executive has the final word on business case and is ultimately responsible.
C. No, because all costs including project costs, operations, and maintenance costs should be
included in the business case.
D. No, because it depends on the organization policy, and they need to check if the operation
costs should be included in the business case or not.
Q17: The senior supplier is very busy due to the number of active projects. They decide to appoint the
procurement assistant as supplier assurance.
Is this appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, as all assurance work should be delegated by the project board.
B. Yes, the senior supplier can delegate this role to a person with the appropriate skills.
C. No, supplier assurance can only be performed by the senior supplier.
D. No, this is a conflict of interest as the procurement assistant reports to the senior supplier.
Q18: Due to the detailed planning and type of work, few changes are expected during the project.
However, the project board still decides to delegate the change authority role to the Tender Manager.
Is this appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, the project board can still decide to delegate change authority.
B. Yes, as the project board must always delegate change authority for large projects.
C. No, they should not be delegating this role if they have time to do this work themselves.
D. No, this is a conflict of interest for the Tender Manager to take on this role in this project.
Q22: While planning the first delivery stage, the quality assurance responsible advises the project
manager that they wish to be involved in the quality activities for the deliverables: level surface and
electricity wiring.
Is the quality assurance responsible correct to ask this?
A. Yes, as they are responsible for the overall quality of the project.
B. Yes, as these are the first deliverables and they can delegate future products.
C. No, as the quality reviewer has already been decided in the initiation stage.
D. No, as they will focus on the overall project process.
Q23: During the stage boundary process to plan the third stage, the senior user wishes to update the
project product description and prioritize the acceptance criteria as there are insufficient funds to
cover all requirements that they wish to do.
What advice should the project manager give to the senior user?
A. That prioritizing acceptance will only confuse the project as some deliverables of the project
will be seen as less valuable and therefore not to do this.
B. That the PRINCE2 principle focus on products insists that all products should be delivered.
C. That this can be a good idea and that acceptance criteria can be prioritized.
D. That it is too late as the first deliverable stage has already completed.
Q24: The fence, dugouts, and artificial grass are major A. Purpose
deliverables in the project B. Composition
Q25: The advertising board is prioritized as “could have” C. Customer’s quality expectations
D. Project-level quality tolerances
Q26:The football pitch will need to meet the national football
E. Acceptance method
association standards
F. Acceptance criteria
Q27: Toward the end of the initiation stage, the project manager is asked by the senior user to show
the scope of the project, and the project manager uses the product breakdown structure to do this.
Is this appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, as the product breakdown structure is the only way of showing the scope of the project.
B. Yes, as the product breakdown structure can be used to show the scope of the project.
C. No, the project product description is the only scope document that should be used.
D. No, as the product breakdown structure also shows the source products which are not part of
the final deliverable.
Q28: During the “authorize a project “activity, the project board refuses to approve the project plan as
the product flow diagram has not been included and this is a PRINCE2 requirement.
Is this appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, there are four parts to product based planning that need to done.
B. Yes, the product flow diagram should be created after the product breakdown structure.
C. No, the product flow diagram is optional and this is up to the project manager to decide.
D. No, the product flow diagram and product breakdown structure are optional.
Q29: The likelihood of risk is considered to be 20% and the A. Identify (context and risks)
estimated value is calculated to be €1,300 B. Assess estimate and evaluate
C. Plan
Q30: The PM documents the cause and event
D. Implement the response
Q31: The highlight report includes this risk E. Communicate about the risk
Q32: While dealing with the above mentioned risk, the project manager adds the risk to the risk
register and lists the same person under risk owner and risk actionee.
Is this appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, as it’s appropriate as long as the risk author was the same person.
B. Yes, as it’s appropriate to have the same person listed as both risk actionee and risk owner.
C. No, it is not appropriate to have the same person listed as both risk actionee and risk owner.
D. No, as the project manager is always listed as the risk owner unless escalated to the
executive.
Q33: During the initiation stage, the project manager ensures that risks associated with the business
case are identified, assessed, and controlled.
Is this appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, as the project manager needs to do this in the initiation stage.
B. Yes, as this is one of the minimum requirements of the risk theme.
C. No, as risks are considered business risks since a value can be placed on each risk.
D. No, this is a responsibility of the executive.
Q37: The Town Services Manager requires a minor change on seating area specification and expects
the project manager to do this without delays and additional costs. Project manager believes that this
change has no other impact on the project.
How should the project manager categorize this issue, and why?
A. This is not an issue and project manager has enough authority to handle it.
B. Categorize it as a request for change because this is a change to the project scope.
C. Categorize it as an off-specification because this is a change to the specifications.
D. Categorize it as a problem and it can be handled informally.
Q38: The security contractor has installed the lighting system and wishes to deliver the associated
work package to the project manager. The project manager finds out that there is a minor issue with
the lighting system but it meets 99% of the specifications. As the opening date of the football pitch is
approaching, the project manager approves this off-specification by granting a concession.
Is this action by the project manager appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, because delivering the project product on time is the top priority.
B. Yes, because the deviation is minor and the issue is categorized as off-specification. So the
project manager can grant a concession.
C. No, because this is an off-specification. The project manager should first check if this is within
their delegation limit, then take the appropriate action.
D. No, because this is a deviation from scope and the project manager should take the
appropriate action so the off-specification is resolved.
A. Highlight report
Q39: The project manager will provide the project board with
information needed to evaluate the project B. End stage report
Q40: This report is used to inform the project board of details of C. Exception report
progress for the whole project and/or management stage D. Issue report
Q41:It provides a snapshot of the status of products within the E. Product status account
project
F. End project report
Q42: During the second stage of the football pitch project, the project manager has reported an
exception that takes the complete project out of tolerance. The project board reviews the exception
report and asks for an exception plan.
Is this appropriate for the project board, and why?
A. Yes, the project board must always ask for an exception plan.
B. Yes, they can use the exception plan when discussing the issue with the portfolio manager.
C. No, they have all the information they need to discuss with the portfolio manager.
D. No, the portfolio manager does not need to review the exception plan for the stage.
Q43: During the third stage boundary process, the project manager invites another PRINCE2
practitioner project manager to do a peer review of the project and give feedback.
Is this appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, the project manager can ask for a peer review during a PRINCE2 project.
B. Yes, as this is mandatory and part of the “learn from experience” principle.
C. No, peer reviews are not part of a PRINCE2 project.
D. No, peer reviews are the responsibility of project assurance.
A. Executive
Q44: Prepares a role description for the project manager B. Senior user
Q45: Consults with individuals or teams with previous experience on C. Senior supplier
similar projects D. Project manager
Q46:Reviews the lessons log for lessons related to business justification E. Project support
F. Project assurance
Q47: At the end of the “starting up a project” process, the project manager submits the project brief
and the plan for the initiation stage. The executive also asks for a copy of the lessons log, but the
project manager thinks that this is micro management and refuses to hand it over.
Is this appropriate for the project manager to do, and why?
A. Yes, the project board should be focusing on making decisions.
B. Yes, the project board should be using micro management to manage the project.
C. No, as it is mandatory for the project manager to give the lessons log to the executive.
D. No, the executive just wants to see that the project manager is gathering lessons.
Q48: Provides the input to the benefits management approach document A. Executive
that is reviewed and approved in the “authorize the project” activity
B. Senior user
Q49: Reviews the end stage report for the project board and confirms that C. Senior supplier
contents of the end stage report are accurate
D. Project assurance
Q50: Advises the project manager of a change in corporate business E. Project manager
case standards that will affect how the business case is produced
Q51: During the “authorize a stage or exception plan” activity, the project board sets the tolerances for
the stage and the work packages for the next stage.
Is this appropriate for the project board to do this, and why?
A. Yes, as they only use tolerance to control the project (manage by exception).
B. Yes, and the project manager can adjust the work package tolerances if allowed.
C. No, as work package tolerances are set by the project manager.
D. No, as stage tolerances are only set in the “authorize a project “activity.
Q55: Toward the end of the initiation stage, the project manager collects the majority of management
documents from the initiation stage into one single document called the PID.
Is this appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, it is necessary to create and index one single PID.
B. Yes, but the PID can also be a collection of documents or other forms of information.
C. No, the PID contains all documents except for the five approach documents.
D. No, the PID contains all management documents created in the initiation stage.
Q56: Project manager regularly checks the quality register and A. Authorize a work package
reads the checkpoint reports B. Review work package status
Q57: Project support updates the configuration items records after C. Receive completed work
checking that each product in the work package has gained its packages
requisite approval D. Report highlights
Q58: The project manager implements actions that will resolve E. Escalate issues and risks
deviations from the plan F. Take corrective action
Q59: During the activity “receive completed work packages” in stage three, the project manager asks
the team manager to send an extra checkpoint report, as they need proof that the work was done on
the product’s artificial grass and the concrete supports for the fence poles.
Is this appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, as this is how the project manager knows for sure the work was done.
B. Yes, and the team manager will also include a signed copy of the team plan.
C. No, products can only be accepted if the reviewer and approver have signed off.
D. No, as the team manager can just send an email as this is an example of tailoring.
Q61: During stage two, while executing the drainage system, the geologist requests a change to the
work package. The drainage contractor is using their own project management methodology, which
requires any changes to be notified in writing. As a result, rather than following the project’s change
management approach, the project manager writes a letter asking the drainage contractor to
incorporate the required changes.
Is this appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, because it is in accordance with the supplier’s project management approach.
B. Yes, because any company has their own approach and project manager should follow the
supplier approach.
C. No, because the project manager should include any required approach in the work package.
D. No, because the contractor is not using PRINCE2, so they should raise an exception for this
change request.
Q62: During a meeting between the PRINCE2 project manager and the security contractor team
manager, the project manager advises the team manager that they must get approval for their team
plan.
Is this an appropriate application of PRINCE2 for this project?
A. Yes, because the security contractor should follow the project governance procedures.
B. Yes, because the stage plans should be approved by the project board, and the team plan
should be approved by the project manager.
C. No, because the team plan is optional, and it is not inappropriate for the project manager to
review and approve the team plan.
D. No, because the project assurance should approve the team plan.
Q64: During the stage boundary process after stage two, the project manager updates the project
plan by marking off what has been done and decides not to add any more information to the project
plan even though the project is expected to be two weeks late.
Is this appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, as the project manager needs to focus on what has been delivered.
B. Yes, as the project board is only interested in what has been completed.
C. No, the project manager needs to update the expected end date of the project.
D. No, the project manager must add the forecasts from the current stage plan.
Q65: As part of tailoring, the project manager decides to update the business case before updating
the project plan.
Is this appropriate, and why?
A. Yes, as the project manager can choose the order of stage boundary activities.
B. Yes, as it makes no difference which one of these activities is done first.
C. No, as all PRINCE2 process activities have to be done in the order listed in the manual.
D. No, as the business case depends on information from the project plan.
Q67: During the last process, the project manager confirms that the project has delivered what is
defined in the football pitch project product description and that the acceptance criteria have been
met.
Is this appropriate for the project manager, and why?
A. Yes, and this is done as part of the “prepare planned closure” activity.
B. Yes, and this is done as part of the “hand over products” activity.
C. No, as they do not have to review the acceptance criteria with the customer.
D. No, as it is the executive who reviews the acceptance criteria with the customer.
Q68: In another town project to build an outdoor skateboard park, the project board instructed the
project manager to shut down the project when only 15% of the project products had been delivered.
The project manager decided to create an additional work estimates document to list all the work to
shut down the project and make the area safe.
Is this appropriate for the project manager, and why?
A. Yes, as the project needs a “closing a project” plan which is approved by the project board.
B. Yes, as additional work may be needed to make products safe or useful to other projects.
C. No, as the project manager should shut down the project as expected.
D. No, as it is the responsibility of another project to salvage what it can from the project.