Dalton's Atomic Theory
Dalton's Atomic Theory
In the fourth and final part of Dalton's atomic theory, he suggested that chemical reactions do
not destroy or create atoms. They merely rearranged the atoms. Using our salt example again,
when sodium combines with chlorine to make salt, both the sodium and chlorine atoms still
exist. They simply rearrange to form a new compound.
What have we learned since Dalton proposed his theory?
The short answer: For instance, we now know that atoms are not indivisible—as stated in part
one—because they are made up of protons, neutrons, and electrons. The modern picture of an
atom is very different from Dalton's "solid, massy" particle. In fact, experiments by Ernest
Rutherford, Hans Geiger, and Ernest Marsden showed that atoms are mostly made up of empty
space.
Part two of Dalton's theory had to be modified after mass spectrometry experiments
demonstrated that atoms of the same element can have different masses because the number
of neutrons can vary for different isotopes of the same element. For more on isotopes, you can
watch this video on atomic number, mass number, and isotopes.
Despite these caveats, Dalton's atomic theory is still mostly true, and it forms the framework of
modern chemistry. Scientists have even developed the technology to see the world on an
atomic level!
Summary
Dalton's atomic theory was the first complete attempt to describe all matter in terms of
atoms and their properties.
Dalton based his theory on the law of conservation of mass and the law of constant
composition.
The first part of his theory states that all matter is made of atoms, which are indivisible.
The second part of the theory says all atoms of a given element are identical in mass and
properties.
The third part says compounds are combinations of two or more different types of
atoms.
The fourth part of the theory states that a chemical reaction is a rearrangement of
atoms.
Parts of the theory had to be modified based on the existence of subatomic particles
and isotopes.
J.J Thomson’s
J.J. Thomson's experiments with cathode ray tubes showed that all atoms contain tiny
negatively charged subatomic particles or electrons.
Thomson's plum pudding model of the atom had negatively charged electrons embedded
within a positively charged "soup."
Rutherford's gold foil experiment showed that the atom is mostly empty space with a tiny,
dense, positively charged nucleus.
Thomson also placed two magnets on either side of the tube and observed that this magnetic field also
deflected the cathode ray. The results of these experiments helped Thomson determine the mass-to-
charge ratio of the cathode ray particles, which led to a fascinating discovery−−minus the mass of each
particle was much, much smaller than that of any known atom. Thomson repeated his experiments
using different metals as electrode materials and found that the properties of the cathode ray remained
constant no matter what cathode material they originated from. From this evidence, Thomson made the
following conclusions:
The particles must exist as part of the atom since the mass of each particle is only ∼1/2000 the
mass of a hydrogen atom.
While controversial at first, Thomson's discoveries were gradually accepted by scientists. Eventually,
his cathode ray particles were given a more familiar name: electrons. The discovery of the electron
disproved the part of Dalton's atomic theory that assumed atoms were indivisible. To account for
the existence of the electrons, an entirely new atomic model was needed.
Thomson knew that atoms had an overall neutral charge. Therefore, he reasoned that there must be a
source of positive charge within the atom to counterbalance the negative charge on the electrons. This
led Thomson to propose that atoms could be described as negative particles floating within a soup of
diffuse positive charge. This model is often called the plum pudding model of the atom, since its
description is very similar to plum pudding, a popular English dessert (see image below).
Given what we know now about the actual structure of atoms, this model might sound a little far-
fetched. Luckily, scientists continued to investigate the structure of the atom, including testing the
validity of Thomson's plum pudding model.
Concept check: Thomson proposed an atomic model with distinct negative charges floating within a
"sea" of positive charge. Can you think of another model of the atom that would explain Thomson's
experimental results?