Isolation, Identification and Characterization of Amylase Producing Microorganism From Soil
Isolation, Identification and Characterization of Amylase Producing Microorganism From Soil
Isolation, Identification and Characterization of Amylase Producing Microorganism From Soil
ISSN No:-2456-2165
Abstract:- The enzyme Amylase catalyses the hydrolysis economical bulk production capacity and the fact that
of starch into oligosaccharides and sugars. Bacteria microbes are easy to manipulate to obtain enzymes of
isolated from the soil are the most common sources of desired characteristics [[1.]]. Soil acts as a major source of
amylase. In this study, soil samples (n=30) collected amylolytic microorganisms. The above study was aimed at
from different sites of Changanacherry were taken for isolating extracellular amylase producing organisms from
screening amylase-producing bacteria. The samples soil that can be further employed for waste degradation as a
were serially diluted and representative bacterial flora monoculture or in a consortium.
was isolated by plating on the nutrient agar media. The
amylase production of these isolates was assessed using II. MATERIALS AND METHODS
starch agar. Thirteen isolates were selected for further
investigations. The growth conditions of these isolates A. Collection of samples
were optimized and they were analysed for antagonistic The samples were collected aseptically from
activity. Two strains were selected for assessing Changanacherry (9⁰26′47.4”N76⁰32′24.8”E). They were
antibacterial resistance patterns by the well diffusion carried to the lab in sterile polythene bags for further
method and to check the antibiotic sensitivity against 12 analysis and stored at 5ͦC.
antibiotics using the disk diffusion method. The
B. Screening and Isolation of Amylolytic Organisms
microbiological and biochemical characteristics of these
strains were also determined. They were tested for The samples were serially diluted upto the dilution of
10⁻6 and 0.1mL of last two dilutions were plated in nutrient
extracellular amylase activity at elevated temperatures
agar plates fortified with starch. These plates were
using the DNS assay method. The strain showing
incubated at 37⁰C for 24 hours. The plates were then
maximum amylase activity (2.395 units/ml) was
flooded with Lugol’sIodine . The colonies that have a clear
identified as Alcaligenes faecalis using 16S rDNA-based
zone around it against the dark background are selected.
method. The selected thermophilic strains can be
These colonies are then purified using quadrant streaking.
employed to degrade starchy waste materials in
The pure cultures were subcultured in Nutrient Agar slants;
monoculture or in a consortium, as well as for the
incubated at 28⁰C to achieve vigorous growth and then
industrial production of amylase. The study highlights
that there is an increased scope for identifying preserved in 20% glycerol vials at -20⁰C [[3.]].
industrially important bacteria from soil.
C. Determination of moisture content and pH of the soil
Keywords: Soil, Bacterial strain, Antagonism, The petri plates were weighed and their weights noted
Extracellular amylase, Isolates. down. 40g of soil was weighed and placed in the petri dish
and were reweighed. The soil was placed in the hot air
I. INTRODUCTION oven and dried overnight at 106℃. The samples were taken
out from the oven and allowed to cool. The plates were
With the increase in population during recent years, weighed again with the dry soil. The moisture content was
the problem of waste management has become an area of calculated using the following equation % moisture content
great concern. The eco-friendly management of the waste = weight of moist soil (M)-weight of dry soil (D) x 100
produced has become the major problem faced by Weight of dry soil (D)
environmentalists. Most of the waste produced is either
dumped in a landfill or subjected to incineration. The To test the pH of the soil samples. 5g of each soil
organic waste produced can be degraded using bacteria sample was taken into tube number 1 and transferred to
which help in the bioremediation of the organic waste. tube number 2. 2mL of pH reagent (pH-1) was added to it
Bioremediation is a process where biological organisms are and shaken for 5-10 minutes. One drop of decolouriser (D-
used to remove or neutralize an environmental pollutant by 1) was added and mixed well. The sample solution was
metabolic process. The process of bioremediation is filtered into bottle number 3 and 2 drops of pH reagent
catalysed by microbial enzymes. The microorganisms, (pH-2) were added and shaken for 1-2 minutes until the
using these enzymes, degrade the waste and use this energy colour developed. The colour was then compared with the
for their metabolic activities and growth. Amylase is a standard pH chart.
hydrolytic enzyme that degrades starch into simple sugars
and is mainly produced by bacteria that use starch as their
primary source of energy. Of the many uses of bacterial
amylase, it also can be used to degrade organic waste such
as kitchen and food waste. The major advantage of using
microorganisms for the production of amylases is the
Fig. 1: Growth of amylolytic bacteria on Starch Agar Media and presence of zone of clearance
The best isolate with highest amylase activity and Nitrogen was 151-200kg/acre, that of Phosphorus was
different colony morphology were selected (13 isolates >15kg/acre and Potassium had a concentration of 50-
viz.ST M₁, ST M₂, ST M₃, ST M₄, ST Ms, ST Ms₃, ST D₁, 80kg/acre. Soil pH and mineral Nitrogen availability appears
ST K₁, ST WRS₁, ST WRS₂, ST P, ST Vc & ST Mo). The to have a cooperative effect on bacterial abundance with soil
moisture content and pH of the soils from which the samples pH being the key influencing factor [[8.]].
where isolated was tested. The sample from which STM₃
was isolated had a moisture content of 9.001% and pH-6. A B. Antagonistic Activity of the Selected Strains
pH of 6 and moisture content of 9.46% was exhibited by the The first step in screening of isolates was testing for
soil from which STMS₃ was isolated. The other samples Antagonistic activity. Each isolate was tested (streaked on
have a varying pH from 4 to 9 and a moisture content of nutrient agar plates) with all of the other isolates to
4%.The physicochemical properties like the Nitrogen, determine antagonistic activity (Table 1). Out of the 13
Phosphorus, and Potassium content of the isolated soil isolates tested for the antagonistic activity ST M₄, ST WRS₁,
samples were analysed. The soil from which the isolate ST ST WRS₂ showed maximum antagonistic activity against the
M₃ was obtained, the concentration of Nitrogen was 151- various strains tested. These three isolates were separated
200kg/acre, that of Phosphorus was 8-10 kg/acre and and the remaining 10 isolates were subjected to further
Potassium had a concentration >150kg/acre. The soil from studies.
which the isolate ST MS₃ was obtained, the concentration of
S S S S S S S ST ST ST ST ST S
T T T T T T T K₁ W WR P Vc T
M M M M M M D RS₁ S₂ M
₁ ₂ ₃ ₄ s s₃ ₁ o
1 ST M₁ - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2 ST M₂ - - - - - - - - - - - - -
3 ST M₃ - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4 ST M₄ - - - - - - - + - - - - -
5 ST Ms - - - - - - - - - - - - -
6 ST Ms₃ - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7 ST D₁ - - - - - - - - - - - - -
8 ST K₁ - - - - - - - - - - - - -
9 ST WRS₁ - - - + - - - - - + - - -
10 ST WRS₂ - - - + - - - - + - - - -
11 ST P - - - - - - - - - - - - -
12 ST Vc - - - - - - - - - - - - -
13 ST Mo - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Table 1: The Antagonistic property of the isolated strains
ST M₃ ST Ms₃
The MAR Index of STM3 was found to be 0.41 and E. Antimicrobial Activity using Well Diffusion test
that of STMs3 was found to be 0.5. The MAR index is an The antimicrobial activity of the two isolates to various
effective, valid and cost-effective method that is used in pathogenic strains such as Pseudomonas, Klebsiella,
source tracking of antibiotic resistant organisms Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Vibrio cholera and
[[12.]].Bacteria having MAR index ≥ 0.2 originate from a Vibrio parahaemolyticus revealed the antimicrobial property
high-risk source of contamination where several antibiotics of sample ST M₃ towards Pseudomonas and ST M₃ & ST
are used.[[13.]][[13.]][[15.]]. Ms₃ towards S.aureus. The results are expressed as table in
Table: 3.
1. Pseudomonas - +
2. Klebsiella - -
3. Escherichia. coli - -
4. Staphylococcus aureus + +
5. Vibrio cholera - -
6. Vibrio parahaemolyticus - -
Table 3: Test for Antimicrobial Activity Against Pathogenic Organisms
2. ST Ms₃ Whitish Feathery, thin flared, irregular edges Gram negative Rod
Table 4: Colony morphology and staining property
The strain ST M₃ was tested positive for Methyl red, the absence of carbohydrate fermentation. The strain was
citrate and oxidase test. It was also noted that the organism also tested positive for Voges Prausker test, citrate test,
produced an acid slant and acid butt indicating that it had the catalase production and oxidase production. ria. The results
capacity to ferment glucose. On The other hand, the strain are summarised in Table: 5.
ST Ms₃ showed an alkaline slant and alkaline butt indicating
ST M₃ ST Ms₃
1. Carbohydrates Fermentation
a) Glucose - -
b) Fructose - -
c) Sucrose - -
2. Indole Production - -
3. MRVP Test
4. Citrate + +
5. Urease - -
6. Catalase - +
7. Oxidase + +
A/A : Acid slant Acid Butt K/K : Alkaline slant Alkaline Butt
ST M₃ 2.176
ST Ms₃ 2.395
Table 6: Enzyme activity of the isolates
ACCGCGTTAGCTGCGCTACTAAGGCCTAACGGACCCCAACAGCTAGTTGACATC
GTTTAGGGCGTGGACTACCAGGGTATCTAATCCTGTTTGCTCCCCACGCTTTCGTG
TCTGAGCGTCAGTATTATCCCAGGGGGCTGCCTTCGCCATCGGTATTCCTCCACA
TATCTACGCATTTCACTGCTACACGTGGAATTCTACCCCCCTCTGACATACTCTAG
CTCGGCAGTTAAAAATGCAGTTCCAAGGTTGAGCCCTGGGATTTCACATCTTTCT
TTCCGAACCGCCTACACACGCTTTACGCCCAGTAATTCCGATTAACGCTTGCACC
CTACGTATTACCGCGGCTGCTGGCACGTAGTTAGCCGGTGCTTATTCTGCAGATA
CCGTCACCAGTATCCCGTATTAGGGGATACCTTTTCTTCTCTGCCAAAAGTACTTT
ACAACCCGAAGGCCTTCATCATACACGCGGGATGGCTGGATCAGGGTTTCCCCCA
TTGTCCAAAATTCCCCACTGCTGCCTCCCGTAGGAGTCTGGGCCGTGTCTCAGTC
CCAGTGTGGCTGGTCGTCCTCTCAAACCAGCTACGGATCGTTGCCTTGGTGAGCC
TTTACCCCACCAACTAGCTAATCCGATATCGGCCGCTCCAATAGTGAGAGGTCTT
GCGATCCCCCCCTTTCCCCCGTAGGGCGTATGCGGTATTAGCCACTCTTTCGAGT
AGTTATCCCCCGCTACTGGGCACGTTCCGATATATTACTCACCCGTCCGCCACTCGCCGCCAAGAGAGCAAGCTCTC
TCGCGCTGCCGTTCGACTTGCATGTGTAAAGCA TCCCGCTAGCGTTCAATCTGAGCCAGGATCAAAC
IV. CONCLUSIONS