The painting depicts a young man holding a miniature portrait of himself as an older man. It uses symbolic objects like candles, flowers, skulls, and hourglasses to represent the brevity and instability of life. Vanitas paintings from the 16th-17th century were meant to remind viewers of death and the transient nature of worldly goods like wealth, health, and life itself. While the young man is how the artist looked years before, the miniature portrait shows what he looked like at the time of painting. The contrast highlights how life changes and decays over time in an inevitable process.
The painting depicts a young man holding a miniature portrait of himself as an older man. It uses symbolic objects like candles, flowers, skulls, and hourglasses to represent the brevity and instability of life. Vanitas paintings from the 16th-17th century were meant to remind viewers of death and the transient nature of worldly goods like wealth, health, and life itself. While the young man is how the artist looked years before, the miniature portrait shows what he looked like at the time of painting. The contrast highlights how life changes and decays over time in an inevitable process.
The painting depicts a young man holding a miniature portrait of himself as an older man. It uses symbolic objects like candles, flowers, skulls, and hourglasses to represent the brevity and instability of life. Vanitas paintings from the 16th-17th century were meant to remind viewers of death and the transient nature of worldly goods like wealth, health, and life itself. While the young man is how the artist looked years before, the miniature portrait shows what he looked like at the time of painting. The contrast highlights how life changes and decays over time in an inevitable process.
The painting depicts a young man holding a miniature portrait of himself as an older man. It uses symbolic objects like candles, flowers, skulls, and hourglasses to represent the brevity and instability of life. Vanitas paintings from the 16th-17th century were meant to remind viewers of death and the transient nature of worldly goods like wealth, health, and life itself. While the young man is how the artist looked years before, the miniature portrait shows what he looked like at the time of painting. The contrast highlights how life changes and decays over time in an inevitable process.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
ART APPRECIATION
A. Moral Message of a Painting
1. WHAT is the moral message of the story behind this painting? (10 points) Vanitas is an explicit genre of art in which the artist uses gloomy and moody symbolic objects in order that the viewer becomes very aware of the brevity of life and the inevibility of death. The origins of the term vanitas can be traced back to the Latin biblical adage from the Book of Ecclesiastes (1:2): As much space is given to the objects as the subject of the painting, which is, ostensibly, the young man sitting beside the table. The interesting thing to note is that the young man (the painter himself) is not the only person in this ‘self-portrait’; he is holding a miniature painting in his hand with the depiction of a much older person in it. So, can this really be called a self-portrait? It would be implausible to consider that the objects in the painting exist in isolation. These symbols of ‘vanitas’ have been selected to illustrate a uniform theme of the “swift passage of time and the terrible instability of life” (Duffy, 2012) in the painting. A style of painting popular in the 16th and 17th century, vanitas paintings were also known by another name of ‘memento mori' (remember death). All the symbols in the painting are objects in a transient state of life, all of them together acting as a metaphor for life itself which is always in a state of motion bound towards a certain end. Lighted up candles eventually lose their flame; flowers wilt, soap bubbles can be broken even by a speck of dust. The skull, the pearls, and coins represent the changing nature of life and wealth and prestige respectively. These can be lost due to a number of circumstances and within the blink of an eye. Nothing is permanent, especially the movement of time which is aptly embodied here by the hourglass. This idea about the temporary state of bringing us back to the subject of the painting. The young man is the artist himself but a cursory check lets the viewer know that that this, not the artist as he was at the time the painting was made. Bailly painted the portrait when he was 67 years old, indicating that while the young man is how the artist used to be some years prior, the ‘real’ portrait is the miniature the man is holding (Kosara, 2007). That painting within the painting shows Bailly in the state he was at the time. The contrast between young and old is striking and this contrast not only magnifies the theme intended for the painting but adds another layer of meaning and possible interpretation to the whole setting. The young man looks contemplative; possibly, the painting in his hand was made to portray his own vision about his future self. His older self is decaying, without the energy and drive of youth and this natural, inevitable process of change is not something that any man looks forward to with pleasure. Surrounded by symbols of vanitas, his imagination would be further encouraged to think in terms of the transiency of life and all things associated with it. the self-portrait composition of a collage is very personal and being such, the author made the process of making it very personal by allowing his self as much as creative license by being spontaneous in creating the collage.... the self-portrait composition of a collage is very personal and being such, I made the process of making it very personal by allowing myself as much as creative license by being spontaneous in creating the collage.... I would like to enjoy the process by expressing myself in creating myself through the self-portrait.